Letter Report of Site Specific Sampling and Analysis Program ...

Letter Report of Site Specific
Sampling and Analysis
Program Results
Augusi 1992
SEC Donohue, Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado 8 1506
Prepared for
U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials,Agency
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5401
Under Contract No. DAAA15-90-D-0007

Contents .
........................................
1 . 0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 purpose ............................................ 1
1.2 Scope of Work ....................................... 1
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............. 1
2.1 Location ........................................... 1
2.2 Site History .......................................... 3
2.3 Previous Investigations .................................. 3
2.4 Environmental Setting ................................... 4
2.4.1 Physiography .................................... 4
2.4.2 Climate ....................................... 5
2.4.3 Gdogy ........................................ :5
2.4.4 Hydrology ..................................... 5
2.4.5 Land Use/Demography ............................... 6
2.5 Nature and Extent of the Problem ............................. '6
2.5.1 Stream Water and Stream Sediment ...................... 6
2.5.2 Gate 19 Landfill .................................. 8
2.5.3 DU Impact Area .................................. 8
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS ................................... 8
3.1 Workscope ........................................ 8
3.1.1 Streams ....................................... 8
3.1.2 Gate 19 Landfill .................................. 9
3.1.3 DU Impact Area .................................. 9
3.2 Methods ........................................... 13
3.2.1 Stream-Water Sampling ............................. 13
3.2.2 Stream-Sediment Sampling ........................... 14
3.2.3 Groundwater Sampling .............................. 14
3.3 Results ............................................ 15
3.3.1 Entrance Streams ................................. 15
3.3.2 Exit Streams .............................. ..... : 15
3.3.3 Gate 19 Landfill Monitoring Wells ...................... 15
3.3.4 Depleted Uranium Impact Area Monitoring Wells .............. .. 21
4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS .................................. 2'1
4.1 Methods .......................................... i21
.....................................
4.2 Results : ..... 'i . 21
4.2.1 Explanation of Analytical Data ..................... : .. j 21
4.2.2 Entrance Streams .................................. 24
4.2.3 Exit Streams ...................................... 24
4.2.4 Gate 19 Landfill Groundwater ......................... 32
4.2.5 DU Impact Area .................................. 35
ii
, . - ... , .
.-. .. .. _
. .

Contents (continued)
5 . 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................... 36
5.1 Entrance and Exit Streams ................................ 36
5.2 Gate 19 Landfill Groundwater Monitoring ....................... 37
5.3 DU Impact Area ...................................... 37
6.0 REFERENCES .......................................... 38
Appendices
Appendix A Jefferson Proving Ground Site-Specific Technical Plan .......... A-1
B Field Sampling Log Books ........................... B-1
C Analytical Results ................................ C.1 .
Figures
Figure 1 . Map of Jefferson Proving Ground ........................ 2
2 . Sample Locations of Major Streams Entering
Jefferson Proving Ground ............................. 7
3 . Locations of Monitoring Wells at Gate 19 Landfill ............. 15
4 . Groundwater Contour Map of Depleted Uranium Area ........... 22
Tables
Table 1 . Summary of Analytes for Water and Sediment Samples Collected from
Streams at Points of Entrance to JPG ...................... 9
2 . Summary of Analytes for Water and Sediment Samples Collected from
Streams at Points of Exit from JPG ....................... PO
3 . Summary of Analytes for Monitoring Well Samples Collected from Gate
19 Landfill Area .................................. 11
4 . Summary of Analytes for Monitoring Well Samples Collected from DU
ImpactArea .....................................
5 . Field Observations From Entrance and Exit Stream Sampling Points ... 16
6 . Gate 19 Landfill Well Filed Measurements .................. 19
7 . Jefferson Proving Grounds Monitor Well Data ................ 20
8 . Depleted Uranium Area Well Field Measurements .............. 23
. ..................
9 Quality Control Sample Analytical Results 25
10 . Laboratory Quality Control Analytical Results ................ 25
11 . Entrance Stream Surface-Water Sample Results ............... 26
12 . Entrance Stream Sediment Sample Results ................... 26
...
111
. . . -_ ...
13

Contents (continued)
m
Table 13. Exit Stream Surface-Water Sample Results .................. 27
14. Exit Stream Sediment Sample Results ..................... 28
15. Results of Groundwater Sampling at Gate 19 Landfill ............ 33
16. Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling, Depleted
Uranium Impact Area ............................... 36

1.1 PURPOSE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to present the results of the field sampling and laboratory
analyses conducted as part of the Jefferson Proving Ground Site Specific Sampling and
Analysis (SSSA) program. Jefferson Proving Ground (JPG) is a U.S. Army facility located
near Madison, Indiana. The SSSA at JPG was conducted in support of the U.S. Army Toxic
and Hazardous Materials Agency (USATHAMA) under contract No. DAAA15-90-0007,
Task Order 0002.
The general objective of the work conducted at JPG for Task Order 0002 was to aid ongoing
efforts to protect human health and environmental quality. Field work directed at meeting
this objective included the collection of water and sediment samples from three specific
areas. These samples were then analyzed to determine if past activities at JPG had caused
contamination in the groundwater, stream water, or stream sediments of JPG.
The sampling results were evaluated to determine if contaminants originating at JPG have (1)
entered the groundwater beneath the Gate 19 Landfill or the Depleted Uranium (DU) Impact
area, (2) entered surface waters and sediments that exit the site via streams, or (3) entered
JPG via surface waters and sediments in streams flowing onto the facility.
This report presents the results and the evaluation.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for the SSSA at JPG was limited to:
0 one round of sampling, analysis, and water-level measurements of groundwater in 15
monitoring wells at the Gate 19 Landfill,
0
0
one round of sampling, analysis, and water-level measurements of groundwater in 9
monitoring wells at the DU Impact Area, and
one round of sampling and analysis of water and sediment at 9 stream-entrance points
and 18 stream-exit points on the JPG facility boundary.
2.1 LOCATION
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND ENVIR0"TAL SETTING
JPG occupies 55,265 acres of land along U.S. Highway 421 north of Madison, Indiana, as
shown in Figure 1. The facility is located in portions of three counties (Ripley, Jennings,
and Jefferson). The installation is approximately 18 miles long (north-south) and 5 miles
wide (east-west). The major portion of JPG is vegetated by hardwood forests. Industrial
1

KEY MAP
0 5 10
JENNlNGS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY

uildings and workshops as well as administrative buildings and personnel housing are
located in the southern portion of the facility. A line of 268 gun positions runs east-west
across the southern portion of JPG. Weapons are fued at targets located to the north of
these gun positions. This line of gun positions is referred to as the "firing line." The Gate
19 Landfill and the DU Impact Area are located north of the firing line. Stream-sampling
locations were both north and south of the firing line.
2.2 SITE HISTORY
JPG has been used as a testing-proving ground since May 1941. A wide assortment of
conventional munitions and weapons have been tested at the facility. These include
propellants, projectiles, cartridges, mortars, grenades, fuses, primers, boosters, rockets, tank
ammunition, mines, and weapon components. The mission of JPG has been to plan and
conduct production acceptance tests, reconditioning tests, surveillance tests, and other studies
of ammunition and weapons systems.
Past and present activities at JPG have resulted in the detonation, burning, and disposal of
many types of propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnic substances resulting in potential
physical and chemical hazards. Physical hazards resulting from these activities involve
unexploded ordnance (VXO). Chemical hazardous wastes include various explosive
compounds, waste propellants, lead, chlorinated solvents, wood preservatives, sulfur, silver,
photographic development wastes, sanitary wastes, and petroleum products. Some of these
wastes are known to have been released into the soil. As a result, the groundwater and
surface water pathways may have also been contaminated. Previous environmental
investigations have been limited in scope and have not entirely characterized the nature and
extent of contamination at JPG.
Impact arcis at JPG include high impact targets, asphalt and sediment-bottom ponds for
testing proximity fuses, a gunnery range, mine fields, and a depleted uranium impact area.
Surrounding the impact areas are safety fans where wide, long, or short rounds may fall.
These areas are all considered to be contaminated with explosive ordnance. The impact
areas are kept clear of vegetation by application of herbicides.
The Defense Secretary's Commission on Base Realignment and Closure recommended JPG,
among other bases, for closure andlor realignment in December 1988. In April 1989, the
Congress mandated that JPG be closed and its mission realigned with Yuma Proving Ground.
As a result, USATHAMA was given the responsibility for managing and conducting
environmental investigations at JPG in association with the Base Closure Program. Under
the plans for base closure, testing activities are expected to stop in 1994 and land disposition
is expected to be accomplished by 1995 (Ebasco, 1990b).
2.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
Several reports regarding various environmental investigations at JPG have been completed
over the years. Many were site-specific while others were facility-wide investigations. The
facility-wide investigations included an Environmental Impact Assessment of JPG (O'Neill,
3

1978), an Installation Assessment of JPG (USATHAMA, 1980), an Update of the Initial
Assessment (Environmental Science and Engineering, 1988), a Report to the Governor
(Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 1989), and an Environmental Audit of
JPG (EPA, 1990). Another significant report dealing with environmental practices at JPG
was a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part B Permit Application for Open
Burning/Open Detonation (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1988).
In January 1989, Environmental Science and Engineering (ESE 1989) completed a limited
remedial investigation of the Gate 19 Landfill and Buildings 279, 602, and 617. It was
during this investigation that 12 of the 18 monitoring wells at the Gate 19 Landfill were
installed. The other six wells were installed in 1981 (81-1, 81-2, and 81-3) and in 1983
(83-1, 83-2, and 83-3).
In October 1989, Ebasco Environmental (Ebasco, 199Oa) began an enhanced Preliminary
Assessment (PA) through Argonne National Laboratory to support the Base Realignment and
Closure Program. This PA was based on a review of the above described existing
information, which included JPG records, reports, and aerial photographs. The enhanced
PA, through review and analysis of previous data, identified and characterized areas
requiring environmental evaluation (AREEs), defined potential pathways for contaminant
migration, identified potential receptors of contamination, and provided recommendations for
further study.
The follow-up report to the enhanced PA was prepared by Ebasco (1990b) in November
1990. This report, entitled Master Environmental Plan (MEP), was designed to support the
Base Closure process, support the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) activities, provide
information to be used to prioritize site actions, and assist in the development of cost-
effective response actions. The MEP described the existing conditions at 46 solid waste
management units (SWMUs) and AREEs, the additional data needs at these sites, and the
activities proposed to collect the additional data.
Another limited investigation was performed at the DU Impact area in order to fulfill the
requirements of the radioactive materials license requested from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. This included the reported installation of 11 monitoring wells. These wells
have reportedly been sampled and the samples have been analyzed for uranium on a regular
basis. No evidence of anomalous uranium concentrations were observed in the groundwater
beneath the DU Impact area. During the sampling performed in January 1992 by SEC
Donohue, only 9 of the 11 DU area wells were sampled, as the locations of DU wells MW-4
and MW-8 were unknown.
2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.4.1 Physiography
JPG is located in the Till Plains section of the Central Lowlands Physiographic Province,
which is characterized by Pleistocene-age till plains with no pronounced moraine features.
The topography of JPG is flat to rolling, with most relief due to stream incision. Seven
streams and their tributaries drain the JPG area.
4

2.4.2 Climate
The climate at JPG is mid-continental with frequent changes in temperature and humidity.
During the summer, the temperature averages from the mid 70s to the mid 80s (T). On the
average, the temperature exceeds 90°F for 39 days a year. Winter temperatures generally
range from 22 to 35 OF. The total annual precipitation is approximately 42 to 44 inches with
nearly 50 percent of the precipitation occumng during the growing season. On the average,
28 days of the year have precipitation greater than or equal to 0.5 inches. The region is
subject to tornadoes and severe thunderstorms. In 1974, tornadoes reportedly caused nine
deaths and many injuries in the communities of Madison and Hanover. No damage was
reported at JPG from these storms.
2.4.3 Geology
Jefferson Proving Ground lies on the western limb of a plunging anticline known as the
Cincinnati Arch. The geology is characterized by glacial tills that overlie Ordovician and
Silurian limestones and dolomites interbedded with shales.
Surficial deposits consist of glacially derived soils over glacial till of Illinois and Wisconsin
Ages. They consist of silts and clays with only minor amounts of gravel and rock fragments.
The two major soil associations present at JPG are the Cincinnati-Rossymoyne-Hickory and
the Avonburg-Clermont. The Cincinnati-Rossymoyne-Hickory soils are generally deep and
moderately well to well drained; whereas, the Clermont-Avonburg soils are poorly drained.
The Cincinnati-Rossymoyne-Hickory soils are composed of silty, clayey loam, loess, and
underlying glacial till. This association is found mainly along stream drainages at JPG. The
Clermont-Avonburg soils are also composed of silty, clayey loam and are found mainly on
broad ridges. Both associations contain fragipan layers (low permeability-firm-brittle soils),
which restrict the downward movement of water. The underlying unconsolidated glacial tills
are typically 25 to 30 feet thick. The unconsolidated tills are generally absent in the stream
valleys at JPG.
Bedrock at JPG consists of thick sequences of interbedded limestones, dolomites, and shales
of Ordovician and Silurian ages. Outcrops of thin-bedded limestones and shales of the
Dillsboro Formation are in stream drainages at JPG. The Dillsboro Formation is composed
of gray calcareous shale with thin-limestone interbeds (up to 50 percent limestone). The
rocks are jointed and fractured.
2.4.4 Hydrology
Depths to groundwater at JPG are relatively shallow, generally less than 20 feet. The water
table varies seasonally. There are several flat areas where water remains at the surface for
extended periods. The apparent direction of groundwater flow is to the west-southwest,
which coincides with the direction of surface drainage and regional dip of the bedrock.
Although little hydrologic information is available for JPG, outcrops of the limestone
bedrock show vertical joints and fractures in addition to abundant bedding planes. These
features may contribute to some downward migration of water from the shallow unconfined
aquifer.
5

Surface water at JPG consists of several major drainages, which generally flow in a
northeast-to-southwest direction toward the Ohio River (see Figure 2). There. are also at
least 10 ponds on the facility. Most of the ponds are stocked with fish and are used for
recreational purposes.
The southern portion of JPG is drained by Harberts Creek, which leaves the installation at
the southwest comer. Middle Fork Creek and its tributaries drain the south-central portion
of JPG.
Big Creek traverses JPG north of Middle Fork Creek and has tributaries originating both on
and off of the installation. To the north and west of Big Creek is Marble Creek, which
originates on JPG.
Little Graham Creek originates off the installation and traverses the north-central portion of
the installation along with its major tributaries, Horse and Poplar Branch. Big Graham
Creek also originates off the installation, traversing JPG nearly parallel to and north of Little
Graham Creek. The two major tributaries of Big Graham Creek are Grapevine Branch and
Rush Branch, which originate on the installation.
Little Otter Creek, Otter Creek and its tributaries, Falling Timber Branch, and Vernon Fork
join in the northwestem comer of JPG before exiting the installation at the western
boundary.
2.4.5 Land UselDemography
There are several small rural towns in the vicinity of JPG including New Marian, Holton,
Nebraska, Rexville, Grantsburg, Belleview, Middlefork, San Jacinto, and Wirt. The area
immediately adjacent to the installation is farmland; crops include sorghum, tobacco, corn,
and wheat.
Most of JPG is wooded with the exception of impact areas and clear areas surrounding
building complexes. As a result, the installation has an active forest and wildlife
management program. Limited hunting and limited timber sales are a part of this
management program.
Employment at JPG ranged from 1,774 people in 1953 to 386 people in 19%.
2.5 NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE PROBLEM
2.5.1 Stream Water and Stream Sediment
Contamination of streams was considered possible from runoff and leachate migration from
impact areas, waste disposal areas, and hazardous-materials-use areas on JPG. Thus,
sampling and analysis of stream water and stream sediments were conducted during the
SSSA. The sampling and analysis were recommended in the 1990 environmental audit
6

GATE 19
0 A3
Miles
LEGEND -
Headquarters
Streom Sampling
Local ion
EN-Entrance
Ex=Ex i t
Figure 2. Sample Locations of Major Streams Entering Jefferson Proving Ground
1681WOl .DGN

(EPA, 1990). Samples were collected from entrance and exit points of streams that drain
JPG. The objective was to determine if JPG is contributing contaminants to the surface
streams or sediments.
2.5.2 Gate 19 Landfii
Groundwater sampling and analysis at the Gate 19 Landfill was initiated in 1988 during the
JPG Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (Environmental Science and Engineering,
1989). Analysis of groundwater samples has included a range of volatile and semi-volatile
organics and metals. No significant contamination has yet been detected. However, because
infiltration of precipitation presents ongoing potential for leachate generation and contaminant
migration to the groundwater system, additional sampling of Gate 19 monitoring wells was
conducted during the SSSA.
2.5.3 DU Impact Area
A groundwater monitoring program was implemented as part of a permit application
prepared by JPG. The permit was required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
license for the testing of DU ammunition at the DU Impact Area. Groundwater samples
have been collected from nine wells inside of the DU Impact Area and two background wells
outside of the DU Impact Area. Past analyses of these samples indicate that no uranium
contamination has reached the groundwater at the locations monitored by the existing wells
(Ebasco, 199Oa and 199Ob).
Additional groundwater sampling and analysis were conducted at the DU Impact Area during
the SSSA. The purpose of the sampling was to determine if chemicals associated with
explosive compounds had entered the groundwater system. Samples were collected from
each of the nine wells located in the DU Impact Area. These samples were analyzed for a
variety of explosive compounds. The two background wells outside of the area could not be
located and, therefore, were not sampled.
3.1 WORKSCOPE
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
The overall objective of the SSSA was to protect public health and environmental quality by
determining if past or current practices at JPG had contributed contaminants to groundwater
at the Gate 19 Landfill, the DU Impact Area, or to surface water and sediments in creeks
that drain the JPG site. Quantification of contaminant concentrations for specific lists of
compounds was designed to support recommendations for subsequent activities necessary to
maintain protection of public health and the environment. The SSSA plan is included in this
report as Appendix A.
3.1.1 Streams
The plan called for collection of one sample at each of the locations where major streams and
their tributaries entered and exited JPG. The major streams exiting JPG include Otter Creek,
8

Graham Creek, Little Graham Creek, Big Creek, Middle Fork Creek, and Harbert Creek.
The major streams entering JPG include Otter Creek, Little Otter Creek, Graham Creek,
Little Graham Creek and Big Creek. Figure 2 shows the sampling locations. Samples
collected from the entrance locations were analyzed for the chemicals listed on Table 1.
Samples collected from the exit locations were analyzed for the chemicals listed on Table 2.
Quality assurancdquality control (QAIQC) samples were also collected from the entrance and
exit locations and analyzed for the herbicides, explosive compounds, metals, total uranium,
and cyanide listed in Tables 1 and 2. USATHAMA certified methods were used where
applicable.
3.1.2 Gate 19 Landfill
Samples were collected from each of the 14 groundwater monitoring wells that produced
water at the Gate 19 Landfill (well 81-1 was dry at the time of sampling). The samples
were analyzed for the chemicals listed in Table 3.
3.1.3 DU Impact Area
Samples were collected from each of the nine groundwater monitoring wells at the DU
Impact Area. The samples were analyzed for the chemicals listed in Table 4. (Note:
Although the wells include numbers ranging from 1 to 11, well numbers 4 and 8 are located
outside of the impact area and were not sampled.)
Table I. Analyzes From Surface Warer and Sediment Samples Collected from Streams ai
Points of Entrance to Jefferson Proving Ground
Analvte
Herbicides
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)
5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil (bromacil)
lithium salt of bromacil, ethylene glycol, ethanol and methanol (hyvar X-L)
2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isoproplyamino-5-triazine
pentachlorophenol
Metals
uranium
9

Analvte
Table 2. Analytes from Sugace Water and Sediment Samples Co1lectedfi.om
Stream at Points of Exit from Jefferson Proving Grounds
Herbicides
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)
5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil (bromacil)
lithium salt of bromacil, ethylene glycol, ethanc- md methanol (hyvar X-L)
2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isoproplyamino-5-triazine
pentachlorophenol
Explosive Compounds
octahydro-l,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX)
hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triazine @DX)
2,4,6-trinitrotoluene 0
2,4,6-trinitrophenyl methylnitramine (Tetryl)
lead azide
lead styphnate
lead mononitroresorcinate
mercury fulminate
tetracene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,ddinitrotoluene
2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
1,3-dinitrobenzene
1,3,5-trinitrobenzene
nitrates
antimony sulfide
nitroglycerin
nitroguanidine
Metals
ICP metals - antimony, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, thalium, and zinc.
GFAA metals - lead, selenium, arsenic, silver, and mercury.
Total Uranium
Cyanide
10

Table 3. Summary of Analytes for Monitoring Well Samples Collected from Gate 19 Lan@ll
Area
Analvte
VOCs - Target Compound List (TCL)
acetone
benzene
bromodichloromethane
bromoform
bromomethane
2-butanone
carbon disulfide
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
chloromethane
dibromochloromethane
1,l-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
1,l-dichloroethene
1,2-dichloroethene (total)
1,2-dichloropropane
cis-l,3-dichloropropene
trans- 1,3-dichloropropene
ethylbenzene
2-hexanone
methylene chloride
4-methyl-2-pentanone
styrene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethae
tetrachloroethene
toluene
1 , 1 , 1 -trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
trichlorwthene (TCE)
vinyl acetate
vinyl chloride
xylenes (total)
Semi-VOCs
acenaphthene
acenaphth ylene
anthracene
benzo(a)anthracene
benzo@) fluoranthene
benzo(k) fluoranthene
benzoic acid
benzo(g, h,i)perylene
benzyl alcohol
bromophenyl phenylether
4-chloroaniline
bis(2-chloroethy1)ether
bis(2-ch1oroethoxy)methane
bis(2-chloroisopropy1)ether
butylbenzylphthalate
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
2-chloronaphthalene
2-chlorophenol
4-chlorophen ylphenylether
chrysene
dibenz(a, h)anthracene
dibenzofuran
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
2,4-dichlorophenol
diethylphthalate
2,4-dimethylphenol
dimethyl phthalate
di-n-butyl phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
2.4-dinitrophenol
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,ddinitrotoluene
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phthalate
fluoranthene
fluorene
11

Table 3. Summary of Analytes for Monitoring Well Samples Collected from Gate 19 Lan&ll
Area (continued)
Semi-VOCs (continued)
hexachlorobenzene
hexachlorobutadiene
hexachloroc yclopentadiene
hexachloroethane
indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
isophorone
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
4-methylphenol
naphthalene
2-nitroanaline
3-nitroanaline
4-nitroanaline
nitrobenzene
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
N-nitroso-di-n-diprop ylamine
N-nitrosodiphen ylamine
pentachlorophenol
phenanthrene
phenol
pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-trichlorophenol
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-
isopropl yamino-5-triazine
pentachlorophenol
Metals
antimony
beryllium
cadmium
chromium
copper
nickel
thallium
zinc
GFAA Metals
lead
selenium
arsenic
silver
mercury
Herbicides
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)
5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil (Bromacil)
lithium salt of bromacil, ethylene glycol,
ethanol and methanol (hyvar X-L)
Explosives
octahydro-l,3,5,7-tetrazo~ine (HMX)
hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX)
2,4,6Trinitrotoluene (TNT)
2,4,6-Trinitrophenyl methylnitramine (Tetryl)
lead azide
lead styphnate
lead mononitroresorcinate
mercury fulminate
tetracene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
1,3dinitrobenzene
1,3,5-trinitrobenzene
nitrates
antimony sulfide
nitroglycerin
nitroguanidine
12

Table 4. Smmq of Analyes for Monitoring Well Samples Collected from DU Impact Area
Analvte
Explosives
octahydro-l,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX)
hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triazine (RDX)
2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT)
2,4,6-trinitrophenyl methylnitramine (Tetryl)
lead azide
lead styphnate
lead mononitroresorcinate
mercury fulminate
tetracene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
1,3-dinitrobenzene
1,3,5-trinitrobenzene
nitrates
antimony sulfide
nitroglycerin
nitroeuanidine
3.2 METHODS
This section provides a summary of the procedures used to collect samples and data in the field.
Any variation in the procedures was recorded in the log books. Copies of field log books are
provided in Appendix B.
3.2.1 Stream-Water Sampling
Stream-water sampling was conducted using the bottle-immersion technique. Water depths
permitting, the sample bottle was simply pointed in an upstream direction and immersed until
the lip of the bottle was just below the water surface. The bottle was held at an angle, allowing
the water to enter gently without bubbling or cascading. Prior to collecting the sample at each
location, the sample bottle was triple rinsed with stream water from that location. After filling
the bottle, it was capped, dried, labeled, and cooled to 4 "C. The cooler containing the samples
was sealed with custody seals. If preservatives were required for a particular set of analytes,
the proper amount of preservative was added to the appropriate sample bottles prior to capping.
Proper preservation was ensured by checking the pH prior to capping the sample bottle.
13

If stream depths were too shallow to permit immersion of the sample bottles, filling was
accomplished by using a stainless-steel sample ladle or peristaltic pump. Samples were
collected by dipping the ladle in the stream and then gently pouring the water into the sample
bottle, while holding the bottle at an angle. This allowed the water to run down the side of the
bottle without bubbling or cascading. If a peristaltic pump was used, the bottle was filled by
inserting the pump-discharge tubing into the mouth of the bottle and allowing the water to run
down the side until the bottle was filled. Preservation and storage procedures were the same as
those described above.
3.2.2 Stream-Sediment Sampling
Sediment samples were collected from the stream bottoms using two stainless steel spoons or
scoops. First, a sample was scooped from the bottom of the stream. Then, using the second
scoop to hold the sample in the first scoop, the sampler drained water from the sample and
placed the sample in the sample container. Sample bottles were filled completely prior to
capping. Gravel-size or larger sediments were excluded from the samples as much as possible.
After each sample bottle was filled, it was capped, dried, labeled, and then cooled to 4 "C. The
sample cooler was sealed using custody seals.
3.2.3 Groundwater Sampling
Groundwater samples were collected using a positive-displacement bladder pump constructed of
stainless steel and Teflon"". Wells were purged prior to collecting samples. A minimum of
three bore volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling, or alternately the well was
purged until dry three times. Most of the wells were very slow to recharge, and purging
actually consisted of pumping the well dry three times. Some wells required a full day to
recharge. In the case of extremely slow recharge, the important aspect of collecting a sample
was to ensure that parameters such as conductivity, temperature, and pH remained relatively
stable. The work plans state as an alternate purging requirement that purging is considered
complete when indicator parameters have stabilized during removal of one-half bore volume.
This guidance was adhered to during sampling.
Bore-volume calculations made during sampling included the volume of water contained in the
filter pack and annular space. During purging, the discharge water was monitored for
temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), and pH. The probes were installed in a flow-through
cell connected to the purge-water discharge line. These parameters were recorded in the field
log book.
Preservatives were added to the sample bottles as necessary prior to collecting the samples.
Samples for dissolved-metals analysis were filtered through an inline 0.45-micron cellulose-
acetate-filter cartridge connected to the discharge line. Samples for total metals were not
filtered. Samples for organic analysis were filled by holding the sample bottle at an angle and
placing the discharge line at the lip of the bottle opening. The discharge water was allowed to
flow gently down the side of the bottle without bubbling or cascading, which limited induced
volatilization of organics. After filling a sample bottle for volatile organic analysis, the bottle
was capped and checked for air bubbles. If bubbles were present, the cap was removed, and
additional sample water was added to the bottle until all air bubbles were eliminated.
14

3.3 RESULTS
3.3.1 Entrance Streams
All nine entrance streams were sampled for herbicides and uranium (see Figure 2 on page 7).
The temperature, conductivity, pH, and characteristics of the sampling point were recorded.
This information is listed in Table 5.
3.3.2 Exit Streams
Water was sampled from 17 of the 18 exit streams as shown in Figure 2. EX4 did not have
water in the stream; thus, only the sediment was sampled at this location. Results for the
temperature, conductivity, pH, and other observations are listed in Table 5.
3.3.3 Gate 19 Landfii Monitoring Wells
Fourteen of the 18 existing wells at the Gate 19 Landfill area were sampled as shown in Figure
3. Monitoring wells 81-2, 81-4, and 83-3 had apparently been filled with grout and were not
available for sampling. Well 81-1 was dry, so sampling was not possible. Alternately, Mw3,
which was not listed as a well to be sampled, was sampled in place of 81-1, the dry well. The
location of an additional well, MW-8, is not known, so it could not be sampled. All
measurements of field parameters taken for each well are listed in Table 6.
An evaluation of the available well logs for the Gate 19 Landfill wells was performed. The
logs were lacking in many aspects, thus a comprehensive evaluation of the data obtained from
the wells was not possible. For instance, most of the well logs did not specify the depth of the
first saturated zone, and those that did were not screened at the first water producing interval. It
is generally deemed of utmost importance for groundwater-site investigations to obtain
groundwater samples from the water-producing zone most likely to be contaminated, which is
almost always the top one. Thus, an evaluation of the appropriateness of the screen placement
is not possible based on the available information. The well-construction diagrams and written
descriptions of well construction were often contradictory, making it difficult to tell if the wells
were constructed properly or would yield water samples from the zone of interest. Table 7 lists
a summary of the information derived from the well logs for the Gate 19 Landfill wells.
The information shown in Table 6 was used to draw potentiometric contours on the site map as
shown in Figure 3. The inferred westerly groundwater-flow direction agrees with the
interpretation presented in the ESE 1988 report; however, without knowing if the wells were
screened in the appropriate intervals, the interpretation is questionable. The potentiometric
surface is generally less than 15 feet below the ground surface and most of the bedrock wells
appear to have some artesian head. This artesian condition indicates that bedrock groundwater
will most likely discharge into local surface streams along fractures and bedding planes.
15

Table 5. Field Observations from Entrance and Exit Stream Sampling Points
Site Temp. Cond. PH
EN 8
EX 1
EX 2
EN 1
EN 2
EN 3
EN 4
EN 9
EX 17
EN 5
EX 14
EN 6
EX 10
EN 7
1.5 "C
3.4 "C
1.9 "C
1.0 "C
1.1 "C
1.4 "C
4.7 "C
1.7 "C
3.3 "C
0.8 "C
0.9 "C
0.9 "C
2.2 "C
1.5 "C
365 6.54
253 6.53
199 6.97
480 7.98
422 7.44
505 7.25
567 7.04
309 7.99
459 7.87
562
643
512
7.54
8.51
1.41
449 7.97
48 1 7.26
16
Flow Sediment
No flow
Moderate
LOW
Moderate
LOW
LOW
Slow
LOW
Slow
Not
Observed
Rapid
Not
Observed
Moderate
Not
Observed
Medium to coarse
grained sand
Fine to medium
grained sand
Light brown clay silt
with minor sand
Medium to coarse
grained sand
Sandy silt
Frozen
Sand and silty or
clay like sand
Medium to coarse
sand with minor silt
and clay
Coarse limestone
gravel with minor
amounts of gravel
Coarse sand and
gravel among cobbles
and boulders of
limestone
Medium to coarse
grained sand with
minor silt
Clay, sand and
gravel
Silty sand

Table 5. Field Observations from Entrance and Bit Stream Sampling Points (continued)
Site Temp. Cond. PH Flow Sediment
EX 6 1.8 "C
EX 16 3.3 "C
EX 15 4.3 "C
EX 13 1.2 "C
EX 12 1.9 "C
EX 11 2.1 "C
EX 9 2.2 "C
EX 8 3.5 "C
EX 7 2.1 "C
EX 5 1.8 "C
EX 4 No Water
397
243
342
341
220
365
204
413
173
3 19
7.99
7.00
6.96
7.13
7.41
7.34
7.60
7.64
7.60
8.03
Moderate,
open
Not
Observed
Not
Observed
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
Moderate
LOW
Medium to coarse
sand
Not
Observed
EX 3 2.2 "C 375 8.08 Moderate Silty clay
EX 18 2.4 "C 355 7.74 Moderate Siltv . sand
Coarse sand in gravel
Silty sand and pebble
gravel
Medium to coarse
grain sand with clay
Sand and gravel with
minor silt/clay
Gray/Brown silty
sand medium grained
Gray/Brown silty
sand minor clay
Pebble gravel with
medium grained sand
Brown, very gravelly
medium grained sand
with trace of fines
Sandy and clay like
silt

I t
-815- POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR
__ azo-- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
75 0 75 150 FEE1
- _.
25 0 25 50 METERS
SOURCES: JPG. 1981; ESE.1989.
-. _-
Figure 3. Locations of Monitoring Wells al Gale 19 Landfill
18

Table 6. Gate 19 Landfill Well Field Measurements
Well Casing Temperature Conductivity pH Depth Total Groundwater
Number Elevation ("C) bmhodcm) to Water Depth Elevation
(ft.)** (ft.)
G19-MW-1 822.7 10.5 808 7.35 11.02 60.48 811.7
G19-MW-2 827.1 11.0 745 7.93 14.10 57.3 813.0
G19-MW-3 829.3 12.8 835 7.30 14.68 57.0 814.6
G19-MW-4 831.2 12.8 1688 10.01 13.32 56.62 817.9
G19-MW-5 826.0 12.0 667 7.97 12.46 36.0 813.5
G19-MW-7 827.8 NA* NA 7.78 16.49 37.72 811.3
G19-MW-9 831.0 13.6 927 7.42 15.10 35.90 815.9
G19-MW-10 827.9 11.7 527 8.02 12.49 37.25 815.4
G19-MW-11 823.8 12.5 642 7.63 12.18 37.14 811.6
G19-MW-12 828.8 13.0 748 7.45 11.55 36.75 817.3
G19-MW-13 828.5 12.7 813 7.16 12.90 36.79 815.6
G19-MW-14 865.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA
G19-MW-15 865.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA
G19-MW-16 864.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA
G19-MW-17 826.0 12.6 875 6.81 6.58 37.25 819.4
G19-MW81-1 830.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA
G19-MW81-2 820.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA
G19-MW81-3 828.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA
G19-MW83-1 826.9 11.5 875 7.10 11.41 44.81 815.5
G19-MW83-2 825.9 13.5 477 7.41 10.73 40.76 815.2
G19-MW83-3 827.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA
*Dab not available (NA).
**The measurement pints for depth to waler were at the top of the casing for all wells.
3..l$lt I ,
, ' .,,. , . I- , . 2', 4
19
d

QU
ma,
o m
I-
9
2 m w
I I
c?
m
u?
m
+ c
0 0
c C
20
r:
w
,
0
N
OOOOO~o~ooooooaa

3.3.4 Depleted Uranium Impact Area Monitoring Wells
Nine monitoring wells at the DU Impact Area were sampled for explosives as shown in Figure
4. All field measurements taken are listed in Table 8. Although the wells include numbers
ranging from 1 to 11, well numbers 4 and 8 were not located and not sampled. An evaluation
of the available well logs for the DU Area wells was performed. The logs were lacking in
many aspects, thus a comprehensive evaluation of the data obtained from the wells was not
possible. For instance, most of the well logs did not specify the depth of the first saturated
zone, and those that did were not screened at the first water-producing interval. Two of the
wells, DU-1 and DU-4, were screened at two separate intervals in the bedrock so that
determination of which interval was actually sampled is not possible. It is generally deemed of
utmost importance for site investigations to obtain groundwater samples from the water
producing zone most likely to be contaminated, which is almost always the top one. The well
construction diagrams and written descriptions of well construction were often contradictory,
making it difficult to tell if the wells were constructed properly or if the appropriate water
producing zone was sampled. Table 7 lists a summary of the information derived from the well
logs of the DU area wells.
The information shown in Table 8 was used to draw potentiometric contours on the site map as
shown in Figure 4. The wells are too widely spaced across the area to interpret the
potentiometric surface or identify the preferred flow paths. It appears, however, that in the
vicinity of incised surface drainages, the potentiometric surface slopes toward the streams at
roughly the same gradient as the surface topography. This implies that, at least on a local
scale, the bedrock groundwater has a tendency to discharge into the surface streams.
4.1 METHODS
4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS AND DATA INTERPRETATION
The A.D. Little analytical laboratory performed all analyses in accordance with the
USATHAMA Quality Assurance Program. The analyses methods and sample containers used
for JPG are presented in the SSSA (Appendix A).
4.2 RESULTS
4.2.1 Explanation of Analytical Data
A complete listing of analytical data is presented in Appendix C. All data have been verified to
USATHAMA Level 3. The lists contain analytical information for all samples collected. The
Qta are arranged by sample matrix into a list of surface-water results, sediment results,
groundwater results, and quality-control sample results. Most of the headings on the lists in
Appendix C are self explanatory; however, many of the method codes and test name
abbreviations require the use of the IRDMIS dictionary to identify the associated parameters.
"Meas. Bool.", as shown in the column of Appendix C, is the abbreviation for measurement
boolean; it is used as an indicator when the measured quantity is not within a certified range or
when the test used does not yield quantitative results. An entry of ND in this column indicates
that the analyte was not detected, and an entry of LT indicates that the analyte was less than the
Certified Reporting Limit (CRL). When the column entry is blank, it indicates that the
21

Figure 4. Groundwater Contour Map of Depleted Uranium Area
22

Table 8. Depleted-Uranium Area Well Field Measurements
Well Casing Temperature Conductivity pH Depth Total Groundwater
Number Elevation ("C) (pmhodcm) to Water Depth Elevation
(ft.)** (ft.)
UO-MW-1 872.80 12. I 857 1.35 Y.91 33.78 862.89
DU-MW-2 850.62 15.6 77 1 7.24 10.44 25.75 840.18
DU-MW-3 854.71 11.3 85 1 7.03 11.44 44.80 843.27
DU-MW-4 902.97 NA* NA NA NA NA NA
DU-MW-5 802.12 13.0 9430 7.43 18.45 35.22 783.67
DU-MW-6 858.84 8.3 633 6.91 8.62 41.10 850.22
DU-MW-7 850.71 NA NA NA 14.60 53.50 NA
DU-MW-8 846.11 NA NA NA NA NA NA
DU-MW-9 821.66 12.9 85 1 7.83 22.58 38.32 799.08
DU-MW-10 867.68 11.7 99 8.01 3.40 41.80 864.28
DU-MW-11 811.49 10.6 NA 7.66 7.40 42.25 804.09
*Data not available (NA)
**The measurement pints for depth to water were at the top of the casmg for all wells.
23
~

analytical result is within the certified range. It is possible to have a blank entry, indicating a
positively identified chemical that is less than the CRL but greater than half of the criteria of
detection. These results are flagged with a P in the data base; however, this column does not
appear in the Appendix C listings. Data with special flags are discussed when the individual
results are presented in the text. The data tables included in the body of the report are
compilations of the positively identified chemicals detected for all samples. Data for the
quality-control field samples such as field blanks, trip blanks, and rinseate blanks are presented
in Table 9 and are discussed as they relate to results for specific sampling points. Table 10
shows the results for samples with detectable methylene chloride in matrix-blank samples, which
were not spiked with methylene chloride prior to analysis. Detectable concentrations of this
compound were present after analysis. This suggests the presence of methylene chloride in the
groundwater samples collected from the Gate 19 Landfill is possibly the result of a lab
contaminant, the evidence being that the detected concentrations in the groundwater samples are
similar to the concentrations detected in the matrix-blank samples.
4.2.2 Entrance Streams
The chemical analysis program for nine entrance streams at JPG consisted of the analysis of
water and sediment samples. These samples were analyzed for six herbicides and total uranium
(see Table 1). Complete analytical results are listed in Appendix C. Atrazine, a common
herbicide, was detected in the surface water at three entrance stream-sampling points-EN3,
EN4, and EN6 as shown in Table 11. Metals were not initially tested for$htrance stream-
sediment samples; however, due to the detection of arsenic in all exit stream sediment samples,
the entrance stream-sediment samples were reanalyzed for arsenic (Table 12). See the
discussion of arsenic in Section 4.2.3, Exit Streams, for more information on the Occurrence of
arsenic.
The atrazine detected in the surface water at entrance stream-sampling points is most likely
related to its use on corn crops upstream from the base. Atrazine is a common herbicide used
for weed control in corn, and approximately 76 million pounds per year were used in the United
States in 1982 (van der Leeden 1990). Atrazine is considered poisonous via the intraperitoneal
route, moderately toxic via ingestion, and mildly toxic via inhalation and skin contact. It is
reported to inhibit photosynthesis of algae in streams. The acute oral toxicity to rats is
reportedly very low. There is no Indiana State criteria for atrazine in surface water; however,
the EPA limits for atrazine in surface water have been set at 3.0 pg/L. None of the samples
exceeded the MCL, and the detection of atrazine is no concern.
4.2.3 Exit Streams
The d y s k program for exit streams at JPG consisted of,water&&w and sediment
samples. These samples were analyzed for herbicides, explosive compounds, Target Compound
List (TCL) metals (water sample analysis included both dissolved and total metals analyses),
total uranium, and cyanide (see Table 2). A complete list of analytical results is included in
Appendix C. Table 13 lists the site-specific results for surface water and Table 14 lists the
sediment-sample results.
24
/

TB-02
TB 1/19/92 1/22/92 CH2Cl, 3.63
TB 1/19/92 1/22/92 Acetone 8.20
TB 1/19/92 1/22/92 CH2C12 3.73
.Only locations wth ddected chemicals of concern are included in this table. Complete analytical data are mc
Sample Sample Date Date Concentration
Number Type Sampled Analyzed Analyte WL)
MW3D mb 1/11/92 1/22/92 CH2C1,' 4.10
Mw-7 MB 1/15/92 1/22/92 CH2C12 4.30
TB-02 MB 1/19/92 1/23/92 CHZClz 7.60
AU data an repotted as Level III. Only locations with detected chemicals of concern are included in this table.
25

Location
EN3
EN4
EN6
Date Concentration
Sampled Analyte Olm
I/ 18/92 Atrazine 0.505
1/18/92 Atrazine 0.490
1/19/92 Atrazine 0.702
analytical data are included in Appendix C
Table 12. Entrance Stream Sediment Sample Results'
11 Location
11 EN1
11 EN4
EN6
EN7
EN8
EN9
Sampled Analyte
1/ 16/92 Arsenic
Concentration
1 I1 8/92 Arsenic 10.20
I I
1/18/92 I Arsenic 7.51
1/18/92 I Arsenic 8.82
11 EN5 I 1/19/92 1 Arsenic I 19.10 11
1/19/92 Arsenic 4.90
1/19/92 Arsenic 5.92
1/16/92 Arsenic 31.80
1/19/92 Arsenic 4.49
26

Table 13. Exit Stream Surface-Water Sample Results
detected chemica
of concern are included in this table. Complete listings of analytical data are
included in Appendix C.
bFitered sample (other samples were unfdtered).
27

EX17
EX18
1/19/92 Arsenic 7.10
1/22/92 Arsenic 17.00
28

Two metals, silver and mercury, were found in the exit stream-water samples and sediment
samples. Silver was found at EX1 (exit point for Harberts Creek) at concentrations of 1.38 pgll
in the water and 1.46 pglg in the sediment. Naturally occumng silver in the earths crust ranges
from 0.12 to 0.27 pglg (Hem 1989). Thus, the concentration of silver detected in the sediment
sample appears slightly elevated. Harberts Creek receives discharge from the on-site
photographic laboratory via the sewage-treatment plant. Prior to 1980, photographic processing
chemicals used at the lab contained silver. Thus, the detected silver is likely the result of
discharge from the treatment plant or from runoff associated with sewage-sludge-disposal areas.
The EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) for silver in water is 0.05 mgll (50 pgll). The
pemissible concentration for silver in water for the protection of aquatic life is 2.30 pglL. The
proposed secondary MCL is 90.0 pgll. Indiana State criteria for protection of human health is
50.0 pglL, and the detected silver concentration in the water of Harberts Creek does not exceed
this level.
Silver’s potential routes of entry into the human body include inhalation of fumes or dust,
ingestion of solutions or dust, and contact with eyes or skin. Of these routes, only ingestion of
solutions appears to be a potential concern for human health at JPG. All forms of silver are
extremely cumulative once they enter body tissues. Generalized argyria develops when silver
oxide or silver salts are ingested. The condition produces no constitutional symptoms, but may
lead to permanent pigmentation of the skin and eyes. Kidney lesions affecting renal function
may result from prolonged exposure. Water-soluble silver compounds may cause death if
ingested. A more detailed study of downstream-water-use patterns, stream-flow parameters,
and human and biological demographics is needed in order to assess the potential threat from
the silver detected in surface water at EX1. There are no regulatory criteria available for silver
in soil. However, because there may be other areas along Harberts Creek contaminated by
silver, additional surface water and sediment sampling will be performed by the Army
Environmental Hygiene Agency (AEHA). Since Harberts Creek originates on JPG, there is no
potential for other upstream (off-site) sources of silver.
Mercury was found in surface water from 4 of the 18 exit stream points and in 2 of the
sediment samples (see Appendix C and Tables 13 and 14). However, mercury was also
detected in the field blank (0.948 pgll) and one rinseate blank (0.871 pg/l), which makes the
detection of mercury in the samples questionable (Table 10). The presence of mercury in the
samples may indicate that mercury fulminate is present in the related streams. Mercury
fulminate (Hg(CN0)d is used in explosive caps and detonators for military ordnance. Ordnance
containing mercury fulminate may have landed in or near the streams during ordnance testing
resulting in elevated mercury concentrations. Mercury concentrations found in filtered and
unfiltered water samples, respectively, are 2.60 pgll and 2.73 pgll for EX1, undetected (in
filtered water samples) and 1.62 pgll for EX 12, 1.44 pgll and 150 pgll for EX15, and
undetected and 2.5 pg/l for EX17. Mercury concentrations at EX1 (in Harberts Creek), EX15
(in the Rush Branch of Graham Creek), and EX17 (in Otter Creek) exceeded the EPA MCL
value of 0.002 mg/l(2 pgll) and the Indiana State Human Health criterion of 2.40 pgll. These
concentrations of mercury are a potential concern.
29

Adverse health effects caused by overexposure to mercury compounds are well recognized. The
most likely pathway for mercury poisoning involves bacterial conversion of mercury. Certain
aquatic microorganisms are capable of converting mercury compounds, regardless of their
chemical specificity, into compounds from which the mercury becomes methylated. For
instance, methanogenic bacteria in stream sediments can convert mercuric chloride into dimethyl
mercury. Methylated mercury compounds are readily absorbed into animal tissues. Mercury is
a central-nervous-system toxin, and the brain is the principal target tissue for methyl-mercury
compounds. The permissible concentrations in water to protect freshwater aquatic life are 0.016
pg/l as a twenty-four-hour average not to exceed 8.80 pg/l. The permissible limit for
protection of human health is 0.20 pgll. Routes of entry into the body include inhalation of
dust, ingestion, and contact with eyes or skin. Thus, ingestion of surface water from EX1,
EX15, and EX17 may represent a possible hazard to human health. In order to assess the
potential hazards of mercury in the exit streams, it is necessary to know the downstream-water-
use patterns, quantity of water flowing in the exit streams, and the characteristics of the
downstream biological community. It is recommended that these data be collected to support
risk assessment for planned remedial investigationlfesibility study (RI/FS) activities. Because of
the presence of mercury in QC samples, additional sampling of these exit streams is
recommended to verify the presence of mercury. Also, any related entrance streams should be
sampled for mercury to determine if the source is on the facility or is off-site.
Mercury concentrations in sediments were detected at 0.50 pg/g and 0.347 pglg at EX1 and
EX3, respectively. There are no established regulatory criteria for acceptable levels of mercury
in sediments; however, the average crustal abundance of naturally occurring mercury ranges
from 0.046 pglg to 0.33 pg/g (Hem 1989); thus, mercury in sediments is not considered
significant at the concentrations detected at EX1 and EX3. However, AEHA plans to resample
sediments at EX1, EX15, and EX17 and have them analyzed for metals in order to confirm the
presence of Hg.
Arsenic was found in every exit stream-sediment sample; however, it was not detected in the
surface water. Because of the detection of arsenic in all exit-streams sediments, the entrance-
stream sediment samples were reanalyzed to test for arsenic. The results of the entrance-stream
sediment samples were similar to the results reported for the exit-stream samples (see Tables 12
and 14). The concentrations for both entrance and exit streams ranged from 1.20 to 34.0 pg/g.
Naturally occurring arsenic in rocks of the earth’s crust averages between 1.80 and 9.0 pglg.
Several of the samples contained arsenic values exceeding 9.0 pg/g; however, they came from
both entrance- and exit-stream-sampling points, indicating that there is probably no discreet
source for arsenic contamination on the facility. The pervasiveness and relatively low
concentrations of arsenic in the stream sediments indicate that the arsenic is most likely due to
background levels of arsenic in the rocks. Furthermore, there is no other obvious source of
arsenic, because arsenic is not a component of explosives. The lack of detectable arsenic in
surface water is an artifact of the analytical method detection limits. Arsenic in aquatic systems
has an unusually complex chemistry with oxidation-reduction, ligand exchange, precipitation,
absorption, and biologically mediated reactions all taking place. Some arsenic will be found in
all environmental samples, provided the techniques of analysis are sufficiently sensitive.
Arsenic is always present in the environment and is available for mobilization and subsequent
precipitation if the appropriate environmental conditions prevail (Korte, et al 1991). In
addition, arsenic is typically associated with clay soils and relatively high concentrations of
30

dissolved iron or manganese. Thus, even though arsenic is a toxic element, the lack of
detectable arsenic in the surface water indicates that there is little potential for ingestion of
arsenic, and no additional sampling is recommended for arsenic in surface streams.
Cyanide (CN-) was found in the surface water at EX5 (unnamed tributary to Middle Fork
Creek). The concentration of cyanide was 7.56 pgll. One possible source of cyanide is
recognized as the dissolution of mercury fulminate (Hg(CN0X) (Sittig 1985). Also, the
detonation of mercury fulminate releases toxic gases of Hg, CN-, and NOx. Cyanide is also
often related to increased nitrogen contamination associated with water that has been affected by
waste disposal (Hem, 1989). It is possible that sludge from the wastewater treatment plant on
JPG was disposed of in or near this stream. Cyanide was used in the Pako Unit (for film
processing) at the Photographic laboratory. JPG switched film processes in 1980 to eliminate
the use of cyanide; however, prior to 1980, film-processing sludge was applied to the land at
numerous locations. Cyanide from the sludge may have leached into the water of this stream.
The proposed EPA MCL value for cyanide is 0.20 mgll (200 pgll). This is not an enforceable
standard, but is useful as a basis for evaluation. The criterion for protection of aquatic life is
3.50 pgll as a twenty-four-hour average, not to exceed 52.0 pgll. Criterion for protection of
human health is 200.0 pgll. The allowable daily human intake is 8.40 pglday. The Indiana
State acute aquatic criterion is 22.0 pgll and the human health criterion is 200.0 pgll.
Possible routes of entry include inhalation, skin absorption, ingestion, and eye or skin contact.
The harmful effects are weakness, headache, confusion, nausea, eye and skin imtation, and
slow-gasping respiration. The affected areas include liver, kidneys, skin, cardiovascular
system, and the central nervous system. The potential for human ingestion of cyanide from
surface water downstream of EX5 cannot be assessed with current information; however, at the
level detected, cyanide may represent a threat to aquatic life, and further investigation is
recommended. Additional sampling of the stream should be considered in order to determine
the source of cyanide and to determine if higher concentrations are present upstream from the
exit point. Also, in order to assess the potential hazards from cyanide in the exit streams, it is
necessary to know the downstream water use patterns, quantity of water flowing in the exit
streams, and the characteristics of the downstream biological community. It is recommended
that these data be collected to support risk assessment for planned RVFS activities.
Nitrate was found in sediment samples taken from 5 of the 18 exit streams. Nitrate may have
come from unexploded or partially exploded ordnance, which landed in or near the streams. It
may also be related to leaching of wastewater treatment-plant sludge or runoff of fertilizers
from agricultural fields upstream of JPG. The concentrations detected in stream sediments were
5.80 pglg for EX3, 7.04 pglg for EX4, 4.99 pglg and 5.16 pglg for EX10, 7.02 pglg for
EX11, and 5.79 pglg for EX18. There is no regulatory-limit value available for nitrate in soils,
and because elevated concentrations of nitrate were not detected in the surface water, no
additional nitrate sampling is recommended.
Atrazine was detected in surface water at the exit stream-sampling point for Otter Creek, EX17.
The concentration was similar to that reported for the three entrance stream samples, two of
which are in the Otter Creek drainage. The concentration of atrazine is below the MCL and is
most likely related to regional agricultural use of the herbicide and not to Army activities.
Thus, no further sampling is recommended.
31

4.2.4 Gate 19 Landfii Groundwater
Analysis of the G19 Landfill groundwater samples included analyses of groundwater samples for
target compound list volatiles, semi-volatiles, and target compound list metals. Table 3
summarizes the analytes tested for in the groundwater. Complete analytical results are included
in Appendix C. Table 15 lists the chemicals detected in the Gate 19 Landfill samples.
Two volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Methylene Chloride (CH,CId and acetone (C&O)
were detected in the monitoring wells at Gate 19 Landfill. Methylene Chloride was detected in
all of the G19 water samples. It was also detected in five of the associated Quality Control
samples (Table 9). Possible sources for methylene chloride include; methylene
chloride/polyurethane residues reportedly disposed of in the landfill (Environmental Science and
Engineering, Inc., 1989), and analytical laboratory Contamination. Concentrations of CH,Cl,
found in samples ranged from 3.43 pgll to 4.90 pgll. Specific concentrations for each well
sample are listed in Table 15 and Appendix C. None of the detected concentrations exceed the
EPA proposed MCL of 0.005 mgll (5.0 pgll). This standard is not enforceable, but is used as
a basis for comparison. There is no Indiana State criterion for methylene chloride. Evidence
from quality-control blanks suggests that methylene chloride detected in the groundwater
samples was actually a laboratory contaminant. The quality-control blank concentrations ranged
from 3.43 pg/l to 7.60 pgll pables 9 and IO), which is a similar range to that found in the well
samples. This relation supports a conclusion that the CH,CI, detected in the samples does not
reflect actual CH,C12 in the wells.
The other detected volatile organic compound, acetone, was present in 8 of the 14 wells.
Possible acetone sources include solvents and paints. Acetone is also a common laboratory
solvent and may represent laboratory contamination as indicated by the presence of acetone in
two rinseate samples (5.30 pg/l and 7.90 pgll) and two trip blanks (8.20 pgll and 8.20 pgll) as
shown in Table 9. Concentrations found in samples from Gate 19 wells include 6.0 pgll for
Mw2, 7.0 pgll for MW3, 6.0 pgll for MW17, 5.20 pgll for MW9, 6.20 pgll for MW10, 6.60
pgll for MW11, 6.10 pgll for MW 13, and 8.30 pgll for MW17 as shown in Table 15.
Acetone found in the samples may be the result of field contamination of sampling equipment or
samples. While on-site at JPG, field equipment used for groundwater sampling was stored in
Building 106, a storage area provided by the facility. The building contained other non-
sampling related equipment and supplies; thus, the sampling equipment and supplies may have
been exposed to paint vapors containing acetone. Additionally, due to extreme cold weather
during the sampling activities, samples were labeled and packaged for shipping inside of the
same building. This represents another possible exposure time. Quality-control field blanks
contained concentrations of acetone ranging from 5.30 pg/l to 8.20 pgll, which in some
instances exceeded the concentrations found in the groundwater samples. This suggests that the
contamination is from a source other than the groundwater and does not indicate acetone
contamination in the monitoring wells. There are no Indiana State or EPA criteria for acetone,
so there are no standards for comparison. Acetone and methylene chloride are common
laboratory contaminants, and at the low levels detected they do not represent significant
contamination even if the compounds are actually present in the Landfill wells. Furthermore,
the same contaminants were detected in trip blanks and rinseate blanks, which casts doubt on
the authenticity of the results. It is anticipated, however, that upcoming work at the Landfill,
32

Table
CIaT-
15. Res1
-
Mw2
Mw3
MW4
MW5
Mw7
Mw9
MWlO
MW11
Mw12
Mw13
MW17
MW83-1
MW83-2
s of Groundwater Sampling at Gate 19 LandfllP
Date I I Concentration
1/18/92 I CH2CL, 4.51
112 1/92 Arsenic I 3.50
1/16/92
1/16/92
Acetone
1/16/92 Mercury
1\22/92 Acetone 7.00
1/22/92
1120/92 I
1120192 I
CHXL
CH,Ch - -
Mercury
I
4.90
3.73
2.12
I/ 16/92 Acetone 6.00
111 6/92 CHD-2 4.02
1/16/92 Arsenic 3.44
1/16/92 Mercury 1.25
1/15/92
1/15/92
1/15/92
1120/92
1120192
I /20/92
1/17/92
1/ 17/92
11 17/92
1120192
1/20/92
1120192
1120192
1/20/92
1/20192
1120192
CHZCL, 4.31
Phthlalate 5.00
Mercurv 3.16
1120192 I Acetone 1 5.20
1120192 CHXh 3.73
Acetone 6.20
CHZCL, 3.53
Mercury 0.878
Acetone 6.60
CH2Cb 4.31
Arsenic 4.49
CHZCJ-2 3.92
Acetone 6.10
CH2% 4.02
Acetone 8.30
CH2Cb 3.43
CH2Cb 3.92
Mercury 1.34
1120192 WCL, 3.92
Alldata2
analysis. Only locations with detected chemicals of ' concern are ~ included in this table.
33

planned as part of the South JPG WFS, will include the installation of additional wells at the
site and resampling of some existing wells. This effort will provide information to either
confirm or refute the presence of VOCs in the groundwater.
The only semi-volatile organic compound detected in groundwater samples collected from the
landfill was a phthalate in MW7. The A.D. Little analytical laboratory was unable to determine
the exact phthalate detected. Phthalates are often associated with plasticizers and are commonly
detected in environmental samples. Only the groundwater sample from MW7 contained a
concentration of phthalate at 5.0 pgll, which exceeds the EPA proposed MCL of 0.004 mgll
(4.0 pgll). This proposed MCL is not an enforceable standard but is useful for comparison
purposes. At the level detected, the phthalate in the MW7 groundwater sample is not
considered cause for concern.
Two metals, arsenic and mercury, were detected in some monitoring-well groundwater samples.
Arsenic was found in three monitoring wells (Table 15). Considering the arsenic detected in the
stream-sediment samples, the arsenic may be naturally occurring. Arsenic was detected in
MW1 (3.50 pgll), MW5 (3.44 pgll), and MW11 (4.49 pg11) as shown in Table 15. These
concentrations do not exceed the EPA MCL of 0.05 mgll (50.0 pgll) and are not a concern.
(See the discussion on arsenic in Section 4.1 for information on environmental characteristics
and health hazards for arsenic.) The arsenic in the groundwater is most likely due to the
reduction of femc oxides that had previously scavenged dissolved arsenic during sediment
deposition. These iron oxides are commonly formed during deposition of alluvium. Iron
oxides have been demonstrated to absorb dissolved arsenic. As the alluvium was buried and
subjected to slow groundwater movement, redox conditions became more reducing, resulting in
the reduction of the iron oxides and the remobilization of some of the arsenic (Korte 1991).
Mercury was detected by the laboratory in 6 of the 14 monitoring wells (see Table 15).
However, mercury was also detected in the field blank (0.948 pgll) and one rinseate blank
(0.871 pgll) which makes the detection of mercury in the wells questionable (see Table 9).
Mercury was selected as an analyte to determine if mercury fulminate was present in the
landfill. Mercury fulminate is used for the manufacture of caps and detonators for production
of explosives in military ordnance. Explosives may have been disposed of in the landfill, thus,
representing a source of mercury fulminate. The RI Report produced by Environmental Science
and Engineering in 1988 did not mention mercury as an analyte. The only statement in the
report regarding metals is that lead was not detected; however, there is no indication in the
results appendix that metals were analyzed for in the samples. Thus, there is no evidence that
mercury was analyzed for or detected during previous investigations. Mercury concentrations
found in groundwater samples were 2.41 pgll for MW2, 2.12 pgll for MW4, 1.25 pgll for
MW 5, 3.16 pgll for MW7, 0.878 pgll for W10, and 1.34 pgll for MW83-1 as shown in
Table 15. The concentrations in MW2, MW4, and MW7 exceed the MCL of 0.002 mgll (2
pgll). The Indiana State acute aquatic surface-water criterion for mercury is 2.4 pglL; thus,
only MW2 and MW7 exceed this value. These acute aquatic surface-water criteria may not
apply because the samples were taken from groundwater, and more detailed groundwater data,
which establish& the groundwater-to-surface-water pathway, needs to be collected. )/
Furthermore, mercury was detected in two of the blank samples making the detection of it in
the wells questionable. (See the discussion on mercury in Section 4.1 for information on toxic
levels and health hazards.) Additional information on the groundwater flow system at the Gate
34

19 Landfill is needed in order to assess the potential hazards to human health and the
environment. It is recommended that these monitoring wells be resampled to confirm the
presence of mercury and that additional studies be conducted to define the groundwater-flow
system.
4.2.5 DU Impact Area
The chemical analysis program for the DU Impact area at JPG consisted of analysis for
explosives (see Table 4). Complete analytical results are included in Appendix C. Table 16
lists the analytes detected in the DU Impact area wells.
Two explosives-Octahydro-, 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-l,3,5,7-tetrazocine (I-IIMX) and Hexahydro-
1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX)-were reported for the sample from MW2. The
concentrations shown by the laboratory analysis are below the USATHAMA reporting levels;
however, they exceed the criteria of detection and are reportable. The source for these
explosives is most likely from unexploded or partially exploded ordnance. The explosives have
apparently leached into the groundwater in the vicinity of Mw2. The concentrations of the
explosives are 0.779 pgll for HMX, and 0.452 pgll for RDX. Federal drinking-water standards
have not been determined for HMX and RDX. HMX and RDX (cyclonite) are both classified
as forbidden explosives. There are no federal criteria for permissible limits in water. The
permissible limits in air as set by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH) are 1.5 mg/m3 as a time weighted average and a short-term exposure limit
(Sm) of 3.0 mg/m3. Available toxicity data for HMX lists the oral LD50 for mice as 1500
mglkg and the intravenous LDL as 40 mglkg for dogs. Routes of exposure include inhalation,
ingestion, and skin or eye contact. Harmful effects include imtation of eyes and respiratory
tract, ulceration of mucous membranes, dermatitis, headaches, imtability, salivation, anorexia,
asthenia, insomnia, unconsciousness, and convulsions.
Because the HMX and RDX detected at the DU Impact area well (h4W2) SLin the groundwater,
there is little likelihood of exposure by inhalation. Furthermore, because the groundwater is not
utilized as drinking water, there is little likelihood of exposure by ingestion or contact. The
only potentially viable exposure route is the transport of contaminants in groundwater to a
surface water discharge point in a stream or lake. Additional assessment of the groundwater
system during the WFS is needed in order to assess the potential hazard presented by this
route. The purpose of the sampling effort at the DU impact area was to determine if explosives
contamination exists in the range-area groundwater and to determine the need for future
monitoring for explosives contamination (Site Specific Technical Plan (SSTP), January 1992).
The intention was to use the DU area as an area representative of other impact areas north of
the firing line. The rationale was that, if sampling indicated that groundwatercontamination had
resulted from testing at the DU area, it could be assumed that similar conditions existed at other
impact areas; conversely, if no groundwater contamination was noted at the DU area, then it
might be assumed that groundwater at the other impact areas was similarly unaffected. The DU
impact area was selected as the representative area because wells were already present there. In
a broad sense, using the DU area as an example of an impact area seems to be a reasonable
approach. The minor contamination detected in one well out of nine is of little concern; if the
area is representative of the other impact areas, then there appears to be little need for
additional investigation of impact areas north of the firing line.
35
J

Table 16. Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling, Depleted Uranium Impact Area'
Complete listings of a dyhl data am included in Appendix C.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 ENTRANCE AND EXIT STREAMS
Analytical data acquired from the entrance streams did not include all of the analytes tested for
in the exit streams. Available entrance-stream results indicate that no detectable contamination
other than atrazine, which is an herbicide, has been released into the water or sediment
upstream of the facility. It is recommended, however, that the entrance streams (Le., EN1,
EN2, EN3, EN4, and EN9) related to exit streams EX1, EX15, and EX17, which contained
mercury contamination above the MCL, should be sampled for metals to determine if mercury
is entering the streams from a source upstream of JPG. Confirmation sampling at the points of
detection is also recommended and will be performed by AEHA. Both sediment and water
samples will be collected.
The other chemical of concern that exceeded the federal criteria in an exit stream was silver,
found at EX1. It is recommended that additional water and sediment samples be taken from
Harberts Creek upstream from EX1 to above the sewage-treatment-plant-discharge point to
locate the potential sources of the silver contamination. Sampling planned by AEHA will
address this recommendation.
The detected cyanide contamination at EX5 does not exceed the proposed MCL; however,
additional sampling of the stream water should be considered to determine the source of cyanide
and to determine if higher concentrations are present upstream of the exit point.
The detected arsenic in sediment samples of both exit and entrance streams is most likely due to
background levels of arsenic in the rocks; thus, additional sediment sampling for arsenic is not
recommended.
In order to assess the potential hazards from contaminants in the exit streams, it is necessary to
know the downstream-water use patterns, quantity of water flowing in the exit streams, and the
characteristics of the downstream biological community. It is recommended that these data be
collected to support risk assessment for planned RIlFS activities.

5.2 GATE 19 LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Mercury at the Gate 19 Landfill exceeded federal criteria in wells MW2, Mw4, and Mw7. It
is recommended that these wells be resampled to confirm the presence of mercury in the
groundwater. Resampling of wells with VOCs should be considered to determine the validity of
the acetone and methylene chloride data. Evaluation of the groundwater-flow system for
contaminant transport potential is recommended as part of the continuing FWFS.
5.3 DU IMPACT AREA
HMX and RDX explosives were detected in MW2 at the DU Impact area. However,
considering the low concentrations detected and the lack of exposure potential to target
populations, no further investigation is recommended.
37

6.0 REFERENCES
Ebasco Environmental, 1990a. Enhanced Preliminarv Assessment Remrt: Jefferson Proving
Ground. Madison. Indiana; prepared for U.S. Army toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, March 1990.
Ebasco Environmental, 1990b. Master Environmental Plan: Jefferson ProvinP Grou nd,
Madison. Indian& prepared for U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency, Aberdeen
Proving Ground, Maryland, November 1990.
Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc., 1988. Update o f the Initial Installation
Assessment, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, Jefferson Proving Ground, Indiana.
Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc., 1989. Remedial Invesh ‘eation at Jefferson
Proving Ground. Draft Technical Report A01 1; prepared for U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous
Materials Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
Hem, J.D., 1989. Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characte ristics of Natural Water,
U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254, US. Govt. Printing Office, Washington
D.C.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 1989. Rewrt to t he Governor on Jefferson
Proving Ground. Madison. Indiana, Indiana Department of Conservation, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Korte, N.E., 1991. A Review of Arsenic
Environmental Control, vol. 21(1) page 1-39.
in Groundwater, Critical Reviews in
O’Neill, J.E., 1978. Environmental ImDact Assessment of Jefferson Proving Ground,
Department of the Army, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, Jefferson Proving
Ground, Indiana.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1988. RCRA Part B Permit ADD1iCatiOn for ODen
BurninelODen Detonation; Nashville, Tennessee.
, 1991. Closure of Jefferson ProvinP Grou nd. Indiana and Realignment to Yuma
Provine Ground. Arizona: Environmental Impact Statement Nol. 1 and 2); prepared by the
Louisville District.
Sittig, M., 1985. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinoeens, Noyes
Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey.
U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency, 1980. Installation Assessment of Jefferson
Proving Ground. Report No. 176, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. Environment Audit. Jefferson Provine Ground,
Indiana, National Enforcement Investigations Center, Denver, Colorado.
Van der Leedon, Fritz, 1990. The Water Encyclopedia, 2nd Edition, Lewis Publishers, Inc.,
Chelsea, Michigan.
38

APPENDIX A
JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND
SITESPECIFIC TECHNICAL PLAN

J
-1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
USATHAMA
US. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency
JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND
SITE-SPECIFIC SAMPLING DESIGN PLAN
Prepared For:
U. S. ARMY TOXIC AND
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AGENCY (USATHAMA)
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
\ CONTRACT NO. DAAA-90-Q-0265
b
Prepared By:
CHEM-NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
NOVEMBER 1991

TABLE OF CONTENTS
................................................
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
.1.1 Sampling Design Plan Organization ............................... 1
1.2 Scope of Work .............................................. 2
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................. 3
2.1 Location .................................................. 3
2.2 SiteHistory ................................................ 3
2.3 Previous Investigations ........................................ 5
2.4 Environmental Setting ......................................... 5
2.4.1 Physiography ......................................... 5
2.4.2 Climate ............................................. 6
2.4.3 Geology ............................................. 6
2.4.4 Hydrology ........................................... 6
2.5 Land Use/Demography ........................................ 9
3.0 SAMPLING OBJECTIVES .......................................... 11
3.1 Introduction ................................................ 11
3.2 Data Quality Objectives ........................................ 11
3.3 Sampling Rationale and Design .................................. 12
3.3.1 Stream Water and Stream Sediment
Sampling and Analysis ................................... 12
3.3.2 Groundwater Sampling at Gate 19 LandfiU ..................... 12
3.3.3 Groundwater Sampling at DU Impact Area ..................... 24
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD PROCEDURES .............................. 27
4.1 Introduction ................................................ 27
4.2 Stream Water Sampling ........................................ 27
4.3 Stream Sediment Sampling ..................................... 21
4.4 Groundwater Sampling ........................................ 33
4.5 Groundwater-Elevation Measurements .............................. 33
4.6 Decontamination Procedures .................................... 33
5.0 SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOLS .................. 35
5.1 Sampling Requirements ........................................ 35
5.2 Sample Handling and Shipping ................................... 35
6.0 QUALJTYCONTROL ............................................. 36
6.1 Introduction ................................................ 36
i
. ... . _,________ -

TABLE OF CONTENTS. continued
6.2 Sampling Procedures .......................................... 36
6.3 SampleControl .............................................. 36
6.3.1 SampleIdentity ........................................ 36
6.3.2 SampleCustody ....................................... 36
6.4 Document Control ............................................ 36
6.4.1 Introduction .......................................... 38
6.4.2 FieldLogbooks ........................................ 38
6.4.3 Instrument Calibration Log ................................ 38
6.4.4 Groundwater Sample Collection Forms .......................
6.4.5 Chain-Of-Custody FOW ................................. 38
6.4.6 Project Evidentiary File .................................. 41
6.5 Quality Control Samples ....................................... 41
6.5.1 Field QC Samples ......................................... 41
6.5.2 Laboratory QC Samples ................................... 41
7.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY ........................................... 42
8.0 REFERENCES .................................................. 43
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Detailed Procedures for Field Sampling and Data
Collection Activities .................................... A-1
B US ATHAMA-Approved Sample Containers. Preservation
Requirements. Storage Methods. and Holding Times
C
For Environmental Samples ............................... B-1
Reporting Limits for Laboratory Analysis of JPG
Environmental Samples (To Be Provided) ......................
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 Map Showing Location of Jefferson Proving Ground .............. 4
2
3
4
5
6
Schemetric Illusmtion of Surface Water Drainage
SystematJPG ........................................ 10
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points ...............
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points ...............
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of TPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points ...............
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points ...............
ii
38
C-1
13
14
15
16

FIGURE 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
TABLE 1
2
3
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS. continued
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excerpt from USGS Topopphic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excerpt from USGS Topographic Map of JPG Area
Showing Locations of Stream Exit Sampling Points . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
Locations of Monitoring Wells to be Included
in Groundwater Sampling Program at the Gate
19 Landfill ...........................................
Example of Chain of Sample Custody Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Groundwater Sample Collection Form (Front Side) . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
Groundwater Sample Collection Form (Back Side) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIST OF TABLES
General Soil Characterizations of JPG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary of Analytes for Water and Sediment
Samples Collected from Streams at Points of
Entrance to and Exit From JPG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary of Sampling Activities at JPG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Definition of Analytical Parameters and Analytical
Methods .............................................
iii
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
26
37
39
40
7
25
28
29

1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to outline field sampling and laboratory analyses that are to
be conducted as part of the Jefferson Proving Ground Site-Specific Sampling and Analysis
(SSSA) program. Jefferson Proving Ground (JPG) is a U.S. Army facility located in
Madison, Indiana. The SSSA at JFG is being conducted in support of the U.S. Army
Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency (USATHAMA) under contract No. DAAA15-90-
0007, Task Order 0002.
The general objective of this work is to aid ongoing efforts to maintain and protect human
health and environmental quality. The work described in this Sampling Design Plan will
accomplish this objective through the collection of water and sediment samples from three
specific "areas." These samples will then be analyzed to determine if past activities at
Jefferson Proving Ground (JPG) have caused contaminants to enter the groundwater,
stream water or stream sediments of JPG. Although JPG is not on the National priorities
List and is therefore not strictly required to adhere to requirements of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), work conducted
during the SSSA will be performed according to standard CERCLA protocols. All work
conducted during the SSSA will also conform to all appropriate USATHAMA
requirements.
The results of this work will be used to determine if contaminants originating on the JPG
installation have: (1) entered the groundwater beneath the Gate 19 Landfill or the Depleted
Uranium (DU) Impact Field, (2) entered surface waters that exit the site via surface streams
and creeks, or (3) entered sediments in the beds of streams that drain the site.
This Sampling Design Plan is the second volume in a four-part series of documents that
govern the work to be performed during the SSSA. The other documents include:
SSSA Technical Plan (Volume I)
* RIjFS Quality Control Plan (Volume m)
* RIfFS Health and Safety Plan (Volume N)
Because the field and laboratory work to conducted during the SSSA is virtually identical in
nature to that which will be done during the RVFS, the Quality Control and Health and
Safety Plans prepared for the RIPS will serve as Volumes I and IV of the SSSA planning
documents.
1.1 Samulinr! Desim Plan Oreanization
This plan, entitled Volume Ik Draft Sampling Design Plan, describes in detail the field
sampling, data collection, and laboratory analysis activities that are to be conducted during
the SSSA. Overall project background and objectives, quality control issues and health and
safety concerns are addressed in the accompanying documents (Volumes I, ID, and IV,
respectively). This sampling Design Plan is organized as follows:
1

1.2 Scorn of Work
Section 1. Inaoduction
Section 2. Site Background and Environmental Setting
Section 3. Sampling Objectives
Section 4. Description of Field Procedures
Section 5. Sample Handling Procedures and Protocols
Section 6. Quality Control
Section 7. Health and Safety
Section 8. References
The scope of work for the SSSA at JPG is limited to: (1) sampling, analysis, and water-
level measurement of groundwater in 15 monitoring wells at the Gate 19 Landfill; (2)
sampling, analysis, and water-level measurement of groundwater in 9 monitoring wells in
the DU Impact Area; and (3) sampling and analysis of water and sediment at eight stream-
entrance points and 19 stream-exit points on the JPG facility boundary. JPG is not a
designated Superfund site and the SSSA is not formally included in the planned Remedial
Investigation/ Feasibility Study (RVFS). As noted previously, however, all sampling and
analysis conducted during the SSSA will be done in accordance with standard
Superfund/CERCLA and USATHAMA protocols.
.

2.1 Location
2. SITE BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTLNG
Jefferson Proving Ground (M) occupies 55,265 acres of land along U.S. Highway 421
north of Madison, Indiana (see Figure 1). The facility is located in portions of three
counties Wpley, Jennings, and Jefferson Counties). The installation is approximately 18
miles long (north-south) and 5 miles wide (east-west). The major pomon of JPG is
wooded. Indusmd buildings and workshops as well as adminismtive buildings and
personnel housing are located in the southern portion of the facility. A line of 268 gun
positions runs east-west across the southern portion of IPG. Weapons are fired at targets
located to the north of these gun positions. This line of gun positions is referred to as the
Firing Line. The Gate 19 Landfi~ and the DU Impact Area ~IE located north of the firing
line. Smam sampling locations are both north and south of the firing line.
2.2 Site History
JFG has been used as a testingproving ground since May 1941. A wide assortment of
conventional munitions and weapons have been tested at the facility. These include
propellants, projectiles, camidges, mortars, grenades, fuses, primers, boosters, rockets,
tank ammunition, mines and weapon components. The mission of JPG has been to plan
and conduct production acceptance tests, reconditioning tests, sweillance tests, and other
studies of ammunition and weapons systems.
Past and present activities at JPG have resulted in the detonation, burning and disposal of
many types of waste propellants, explosives and pyrotechnic substances at the site. These
activities have resulted in several physically and chemically hazardous wastes throughout
the facility. Physical hazards mainly involve unexploded ordnance (UXO). Chemically
hazardous wastes include various explosive compounds, waste propellants, lead,
chlorinated solvents, wood preservatives, sulfur, silver, photographic development wastes,
sanitary wastes, and petroleum products. Some of these wastes are known to have been
released into the soil. As a result, the groundwater and surface water pathways may have
also been contaminated. Previous environmental investigations have been limited in scope
and have not adequately characterized the nature and extent of contamination at JPG.
Impact areas at JPG include high impact targets, asphalt and sediment bottom ponds for
testing proximity fuses, a gunnery range, mine fields, and a depleted uranium impact area.
Surrounding the impact areas are safety fans where wide, long, or short rounds may fall.
These areas are all considered to be contaminated with explosive ordnance. The impact
areas are kept clear of vegetation by herbicides application.
The Defense Secretary’s Commission on Base Realignment and Closure recommended
JPG among other bases for closure and/or realignment in December 1988. The Congress
mandated JFG be closed and its mission be realigned with Yuma Proving Ground in April
1989. As a result, USATHAMA was given the responsibility for managing and
conducting environmental investigations at JPG in association with the Base Closure
Program. Under the base closure plan, testing activities are expected to stop in 1994 and
land disposition accomplished by 1995 (Ebasco, 1990).
3

SCALE IN MILES
0 5 10
KEY MAP
\JEFFERSON PROVING CROLMO
Figure 1. Map showing location of Jefferson Proving Ground.
Ir

2.3 Previous Investieations
Section 8.0 of this plan provides a list of References to previous investigations conducted
at JPG. Several reports regarding various environmental aspects of JF'G have been written
over the years. Many were site-specific while others were facility-wide investigations.
The facility-wide investigations included an Environmental Impact Assessment of JPG
(ONeill, 1978), an Installation Assessment of JPG (USATHAMA, 1980), an Update of
the Initial Assessment (Environmental Science and Engineering, (1988), a Report to the
Governor (Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 1989) and an
Environmental Audit of JPG (EPA, 1990). Another significant report dealing with
environmental practices at JPG was a RCRA Part B Permit Application for Opn
BurningQen Detonation (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1988).
In January, 1989, Environmental Science and Engineering (1989) completed a limited
remedial investigation of the Gate 19 Landfill and Buildings 279,602, and 617. It was
during this investigation that 12 of the 15 monitoring wells at the Gate 19 Landfill were
installed.
In October, 1989, Ebasco Environmental (Ebasco, 1990a) began an enhanced Preliminary
Assessment (PA) through Argonne National Laboratory to support the Base Realignment
and Closure Program. This PA was based on a review of the above described existing
information which included JFG records, reports, and aerial photographs. The enhanced
PA, through review and analysis of previous data, identified and characterized areas
requiring further environmental evaluation (AREEs), defined potential pathways for
contaminant migration, identified potential receptors of contamination, and provided
recommendations for further study.
A follow-up report to the enhanced PA was prepared by Ebasco (199Ob) in November,
1990. This report, Master Environmental Plan (MEP), was designed to support the Base
Closure process by providing additional information required to characterize areas of
concern at JFG, supporting the Installation Restoration Program (lRP) activities, providing
information to be. used to prioritize site actions, and assisting in the development of costeffective
response actions. The h4EP described, in detail, the existing conditions at 46
S W s and AREEs at JPG, additional data required, and proposed activities to provide
the required data.
Monitoring wells were installed at the DU Impact Area as part of the requirements of the
radioactive materials license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (insert
reference to hXC permit application and license upon receipt from Richard Hemng, JPG)
2.4 Environmental Setti ng
2.4.1 Physiography
JPG is located in the Till Plains section of the Cenaal Lowlands Physiographic Province
which is characterized by young till plains with no pronounced moraine features.
Topography of IPG is flat to rolling, with most relief due to smam incision. Seven

streams and their tributaries drain the JPG area
2.4.2 Climate
The climate at JPG is midcontinental with frequent changes in temperature and humidity.
During the summer, the temperature averages from the mid 70s and mid 80s (“F) and on an
average, the temperature exceeds 90°F for 39 days a year. Winter temperatures generally
range from 22-35°F. The total annual precipitation is approximately 42-44 inches with
nearly 50 percent of the precipitation occurring during the growing season. On the
average, 28 days of the year have precipitation greater than or equal to 0.5 inch. The
region of JPG is subject to tornadoes and severe thunderstorms. Tornadoes in 1974
reportedly caused nine deaths and many injuries in the communities of Madison and
Hanover. No damage has been reported for JF‘G from these storms.
2.4.3 Geology
Jefferson Proving Ground lies on the western limb of a plunging anticline known as the
Cincinnati Arch. The geology is characterized by glacial tills that overlie Ordovician and
Silurian limestones and dolomites interbedded with shales.
Surficial deposits consist of glacially-derived soils over glacial till of Illinoisan and
Wisconsinan Age and is characterized by silts and clays with only minor amounts of gravel
and rock fragments. The two major soil associations present at JPG are the Cincinnati-
Rossmoyne-Hickory and the Avonburg-Clermont. The Cincinnati-Rossymoyne-Hickory
soils are generally deep, moderately well to well drained whereas the Clemont-Avonburg
soils are somewhat poorly drained. The Cincinnati-Rossmoyne-Hickory soils have a silt
loam surface layer and silty clay loam and clay loam subsoil. This association is found
mainly on ridgetops, breaks, and hillsides at JPG. The Clermont-Avonburg soils contain a
silt loam surface layer and silty clay loam and clay loam subsoil. These soils are gently
sloping soils located on broad ridges. Both associations contain fragipan layers (low
permeability, fim~ and brittle) which restrict the downward movement of water. The soil
types at JF’G are summarized in Table 1. The underlying unconsolidated glacial tills are
typically 25 to 30 feet thick but are generally absent in the stream valleys at JPG.
Bedrock at JPG consists of thick sequences of interbedded limestones, dolomites, and
shales or Ordovician and Silurian ages. Outcrops of thinly bedded limestones and shales
see in stream drainages at JPG are from the Dillsboro Formation. The Dillsboro Formation
is composed of gray calcareous shale with thin limestone interbeds (up to 50%). The
sequence contains joints and fractures.
2.4.4 Hydrology
Water table depths within JPG are relatively shallow, generally less than 20 feet. The
water table varies according to the season. There are several flat areas where the water is at
the surface and remains for extended periods. The apparent direction of groundwater flow
is to the west-southwest which coincides with the direction of surface drainage and regional
dip of the bedrock.
-. - . ... ~
6

c vl
7
YI

I I
8

Although little hydrologic information is available for IPG, outcrops of the limestone
bedrock show vertical joints and fractures in addition to abundant bedding planes. These
features may contribute to some downward migration of water from the shallow
unconfmed aquifer.
Surface water at IPG consists of several major drainages which generally flow in a
northeast to southwest direction across JPG toward the Ohio River (Figure 2) and also
consists of at least 10 pondsflakes (most of which are stocked with fish and used for
recreational purposes.
The southem poreion of JPG is drained by Harberts Creek which leaves the installation at
the southwest comer. Middle Fork Creek and its tributaries drain the south central portion
of JPG.
Big Creek traverses JPG north of Middle Fork Creek and has tributaries originating both
on and off the installation. To the north and west of Big Creek is Marble Creek, which
originates on JPG.
Little Graham Creek originates off the installation and traverses the north central portion of
the installation along with its major tributaries, Horse and Poplar Branch. Big Graham
Creek also originates off the installation, traversing JPG nearly parallel to and north of
Little Graham Creek The two major tributaries of Big Graham Creek are Grapevine
Branch and Rush Branch which originate on the installation.
Little Otter Creek, Otter Creek and its tributaries, Falling Timber Branch and Vernon Fork,
join in the northwestern comer of JPG before exiting the installation at the western
boundary.
2.5 Land UselDemo- h
JPG is surrounded by seved small rural towns including New Marian, Holton, Nebraska,
RexviUe, Grantsburg, Belleview, Middlefork, San Jacinto and Wirt. The area immediately
adjacent to the installation is farm land consisting primarily of crops of sorghum, tobacco,
corn, and wheat.
Most of JPG is wooded with the exception of impact areas and clear areas surrounding
building complexes. As a result, the installation has an active forest and wildlife
management program. Limited hunting and limited timber sales are apart of this
management program.
Employment at JPG ranged from 1,774 in 1953 to the present employment which in 1990
was reported at 386.
9

Figure 2. Schematic illusuation of surface water drainage system at JPG.
10
H
0 mi. 1 mi.

3.1 Introduction
3. SAMPLING OBECTNES
The overall objective of the SSSA is to protect public health and environmental quality by
determining if past or current practices at JPG have contributed contaminants to
groundwater at the Gate 19 Landfill or the DU Impact Area or to surface wakr and
sediments in creeks that drain the JPG site. Quantification of contaminant concentrations
for specific lists of compounds will allow recommendations to be made for subsequent
activities necessary to maintain protection of public health and the environment
3.2 Data Oualitv Obiectives
Because the work to performed during the SSSA will be done according to CERCLA as
well as USATHAMA protocols, data quality objectives OQOs) and levels will be specified
for each of the data collection activities. DQos provide a mechanism of categorizing data
according to the level of analytical support needed to satisfy planned data use objectives
(EPA, 1987). A brief summary the five data quality levels is provided here:
- Level I-field screening or analysis using portable instruments. Results are often not
compound-specific and not quantitative. This is the most inexpensive analytical option
and is capable of providing "real-time" data (i.e. no turn-around time).
* Level II-field analyses using mom sophisticated portable analytical instruments: in
some cases, the inshuments may be set up in a mobile laboratory on site. There is a
wide range in the quality of the data that can be generated. It depends on the use of
suitable calibration standards, reference materials, and sample preparation equipment
Results become available within minutes to several hours.
Level III-all analyses performed in an off-site analytical laboratory. Level III analyses
may or may not use CLP procedures. Validation and documentation procedures
required for CLP Level IV analysis are not commonly required for Level III analysis.
The analytical laboratory may or may not be a certified CLP laboratory.
Level IV-CLP routine analytical services. All analyses are performed in an off-site
CLP analytical laboratory following UP protocols. Level IV is characterized by
rigorous QNQC protocols and documentation.
Level V-analysis by non-standard methods. All analyses are performed in an off-site
laboratory which may or may not be a CLP laboratory. Method development or
method modification may be required for specific constituents or detection limits.
For all chemical analysis of water and sediment samples, the data quality objective will be
contaminant detection and concentration quantification. For the SSSA, aIl laboratory
analysis to determine concentrations of "exotic" explosive compounds will be classified as
Data Quality Level V, since the analytical methods to be used are those required and
approved by USATHAMA. Laboratory analysis for more conventional compounds, such
as Target Analyte List (TAL) metals, will carry a data quality level of III and will be based
11

on CJ,P-approved and USATHAMA-approved analytical procedures. The data quality
objective for groundwater-elevation measurements will be to establish approximate
groundwater flow direcdons and velocities. The data quality level will be Level 11.
3.3 SamDling Rationale and Desim
This section describes the rationale for each of the thxtx data collection activities to be
conducted during the SSSA. A detailed description of the data to be collected (e.g. analyte
lists) is also provided.
3.3.1 Stream Water and Stream Sediment Sampling and Analysis
It is possible that contaminants from impact areas, waste disposal areas, and hazardous-
materials-use areas on JPG could be transported (via overland flow and groundwater
discharge) to surface streams and sediments. Because the surface streams that drain JPG
would provide a mechanism by which potential contaminants could rapidly migrate off the
facility, and these streams have never been tested for contamination in the past, sampling
and analysis of stream water and smam sediment will be conducted during the SSSA.
This sampling and analysis was recommended in the 1990 EPA environmental audit @PA,
1990). Samples will be collected from entrance and exit points of streams that drain JPG.
The objective of the sampling and analysis is to determine if JPG is contributing
contaminants to the surface streams or sediments.
Four major streams and their tributaries enter JPG at eight different locations. These
streams include Otter Creek, Graham Creek, Little Graham Creek, and Big Creek. At 19
different locations, a total of seven streams and their tributaries exit the JFG boundary.
These streams include Otter Cree@ Graham Creek, Little Graham b k , Marble creek,
Big Creek, Middle Fork Creek, and Harbert Creek. Drainage is generally from the
northeast to the southwest. Water and sediment samples will be collected from the eight
main entrance points and the 19 main exit points. At both entrance and exit points, samples
will be collected from just inside the JPG property boundary so as to prevent property
access problems involving private landowners. The locations of entrance and exit sample
points are shown in Figures 3-13.
Samples from ennance points will be analyzed for six herbicides and total uranium.
Samples from exit points will be analyzed for herbicides, explosive compounds and Target
Analyte List (TAL) metals (water sample analysis will include both dissolved and total
metals analyses). Analysis of samples from the five exit locations that receive drainage
from the DU Impact area (exit points 3,5,6,7, and 8) will include total uranium. All
QNQC stream samples will be analyzed for the complete set of herbicides, explosive
compounds, metals and total uranium. Table 2 summarizes the analytes for water and
sdment samples from stream entrance and exit points.
3.3.2 Groundwater Sampling at Gate 19 Landfill
Groundwater sampling and analysis at the Gate 19 Landfill was initiated in 1988 during the
JPG RI/FS (Environmental Science and Engineering, 1989). Analysis of groundwater
samples has included a range of volatile and semi-volatile organics and metals. No
significant contamination has yet been detected. However, because infilrration of
12

Figure 3. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of IPG area showing locations of smm
entrance and stream exit sampling points.
I3

- . . - - -. . . - . - - .
Figure 6. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of
entrance and stream exit sampling points.
16
area showing locations of stream

Figure 8. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of
entrance and srream exit sampling points.
18
area showing locations of stream

Figure 9. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of JPG area showing locations of stream
entrance and stream exit sampling points.
19

Figure 10. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of JPG area showing locations of stream
entrance and stream exit sampling 7 0 points.

Figure 11. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of JPG area showing locations of stream
entrance and smam exit sampling points.
21

Figure 12. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of JPG area showing locanons of stream
entrance and stream exit sampling points.
22

THIS PAGE TO BE DELETED
Figure 13. Excerpt from USGS topographic map of JF'G area showing locations of stream
entrance and stream exit sampling points.
23

precipitation presentsan ongoing potential for leachate generation and contaminant
migration to the groundwater system, additional sampling of Gate 19 monitoring wells will
be conducted during the SSSA.
Groundwater samples will be collected from the 15 existing wells at the Gate 19 Landfill.
The locations of the 15 wells to be sampled are shown in Figure 14.
Samples from the wells will be analyzed for Target Compound List PCL) volatile and
semi-volatile organics and total and dissolved Target Analyte List (TAL) metals.
Groundwater-elevation measurements will also be made to allow calculation of hydraulic
gradients and groundwater velocity estimates. Repeat water-level measurements will be
conducted during any additional field work activities that take place after the initial SSSA
groundwater sampling.
During a preliminary site tour conducted by CNES personnel in October 1991, several of
the Gate 19 Landfill wells were found to be marked with identical well labels (for example,
three wells were found to be labeled M I). To eliminate the confusion created by this
situation, new well identifiers will be assigned to each of the wells. Using an "engine-
block" stamp, these new identifiers will be stamped into the protective steel casings that
cover each of the well risers. A map will then be prepared showing the lccation and
identifier for each of the 15 wells. To the extent possible, a table will also be prepared
which cross-refennces new well identifkrs with previous well labels.
3.3.3 Groundwater Sampling at DU Impact Area
As part of a permit application prepared by JPG to obtain a Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) license for the testing of DU ammunition, a groundwater monitoring
program was implemented for the DU Impact Area. Groundwater samples have been
collected from nine wells in the DU Impact Area and two background wells outside the DU
Impact Area Past analyses of these samples indicates that no uranium contamination has
reached the groundwater at the locations monitored by the existing wells (Fibasco, 1990a
and 1990b).
To adhere to requirements of the DU permit application and NRC license, additional
groundwater sampling and analysis will be conducted at the DU Impact Area during the
SSSA. Samples will be collected from each of the nine wells located in the DU Impact
Area. These samples will be analyzed for explosive compounds (Table 2) and total
uranium. Groundwater-level measmments will also be made immediately prior to the
sampling of each of the nine wells. Repeat water level measurements will be conducted
during any additional field work that takes place after the initial round of DU Impact Area
well sampling. These water-level elevation data wil be used to assess hydraulic gradients
(directions and magnitudes) across the DU Impact Area.
24

Table 2. Summary of analytes for water and sediment samples collected from streams at
points of enhance to and exit from JPG. Explosive compounds and uranium
also to be included in analyte list for groundwater samples from DU Impact
Area.
-.
ANALYE
SAMPLE TYPEa
Herbicides
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacehc acid (2,4,5-T)
5-Brom~3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil (Bromacil)
EN, EX, QA
EN, EX, QA
EN, EX, QA
Lithium salt of Brumacil, ethylene glycol,
ethanol and methanol (Hyvar X-L) EN, EX, QA
2-Chloro-4ethylamino-6-isopruplyamino
-5-niazine EN, EX, QA
Pentachlorophenol EN, EX, QA
Explosive Compounds
Octahydrc-l,3,5,7-teaazocine (HMX)
Hexahydro- 1,3,5-&itro- 1,3,5-ma7ine (WX)
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT)
2,4,6-TMitrophenyl methylnitramine (Teayl)
Lead azide
Lead styphnate
Lead mononimresorcinate
Mercury fulminate
Tetracene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Diniaotoluene
2-Amino-4,6dinitrotoluene
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
1,3,5-Trinimbenzene
Nitrates EX,QA
Antimony sulfide
Nitroglycerin
Nitroguanidine
Metals
Dissolved TAL metals
Total TAL metals
Total Uraniumb
EX, QA
EX, QA
EX, QA
aEN = enmce-point sample, EX = exit-point sample, QA =quality control sample.
bUranium to be included in the analysis of samples from exit points 3,5,6,7, and 8
25

Figure 14. Locations of monitoring wells to be included h groundwater sampling
program at the Gate 19 Landfill.
26

4.1 Intr- n
4. DESCRIPTION OF FIELD PROCEDURES
This section provides a summary of the procedures that will be used to collect samples and
data in the field. It is intended to serve as a guide to field crews and does not, therefore,
provide compIete step by step instructions for every sampling or data collection method.
Detailed step-by-step procedures are provided in Appendix A.
Sampling tasks, locations and related information are summarized in Table 4-1. Any
departure from the planned approach outlined in Table 4-1 will be documented in field
logbooks and on Variance reporting forms. Analytical methods to be used for the
laboratory analysis of the samples collected at JF'G are listed in Table 4-2. Information
associated with sample container types and sizes, sample preservation methods and sample
holding times is presented in Appendix B
4.2 Stream Water Sampling
When adequate water depths are available, stream-water sampling will be conducted using
the bottle-immersion technique. The sample bottle is simply immersed until the lip on the
opening of the bottle is just below the water surface. The bottle is held at an angle,
allowing the water to enter through the opening and drain gently into the bottle without
bubbling or cascading. The bottle will be capped and checked for air bubbles. If bubbIes
arc present, the bottle will be reopened to add more water and eliminate any air from the
sample. The bottle will then be capped, dried, sealed with a wax film, and then cooled to
4" C. If preservation is required for a particular set of analytes (see Appendix B), the
proper amount of preservative will be added to the appropriate sample bottles just prior to
capping.
If stream depths are too shallow to permit immersion of the sample bottles, filling will be
accomplished by using a stainless steel sample ladle or peristaltic pump. Samples will be
collected by dipping the ladle in the stream and then gently pouring the water into the
sample bottle, while holding the bottle at an angle. This will allow the water to run down
the side of the bottle without bubbling or cascading. Samples collected from exit stream
locations for dissolved metals analysis wil initially be collected in a large Teflon reservoir,
using either a stainless steel sample ladle or a peristaltic pump. Individual samples will
then be prepared by transferring the sample water from the reservoir to the sample bottles
using a peristaltic pump with an idine 0.45 micron cellulose-acetate cartridge filter.
4.3 Stream Sediment Sampling
Sediment samples will be collected from the stream bottoms using a stainless steel spoon or
scoop. Using a second scoop to hold the sample in the first, water will be drained from the
sample, and the sampIe will then be placed in the sample container. Sample bottles wil be
completely fdled prior to capping. During sampling, every effort will be made to avoid
inclusion of any material that is gravel-size or larger. After each sample bottle is filled, it
will be capped, dried, sealed with a wax film, and then cooled to 4' C.
27

Table 4 . Definition of Analytical Parameters and Analytical Methods
__
Acronym Laboratory Parameters Analytical Method
in text
VOCS
Target Co mpound List ITC L)
1) Volatile Organic Compounds
acetone
benzene
bromodichloromethane
bromoform
bromomethane
2-butanone
carbon disulfide
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
chloromethane
di bromochloromethane
1,l-dichloroethane
1,2dichloroethane
1, Idichlorcethene
1,2-dichloroethene (total)
1,2-dichloropropane
cis- 1,3-dichloropropene
trans- 1,3-dichloropropene
ethylbenzene
2-hexanone
methylene chloride
4-methyl-2-pentanone
styrene
1.1.2.2-tetrachloroethane
tetrachloroethene
toluene
l,l,l-Qichloroethane
l11,2-trichloroethane
mchloroethene (TCE)
vinyl acetate
vinyl chloride
xylenes (total)
USATHAMA UM17
Semi-VOCs
2) Semi-volatile Organic Compounds USATHAMA UM16
acenaphthene
acenaphthylene
anthracene
benzo(a)anthracene
benzo@)fluomthene
benzo(k)fluomthene
29

Table 4 (cont). Definition of Analytical Parameters and Analytical Methods
Acronym Laboratory Parameters Analytical Method
in text
Semi-VOCs (cont) 2) Semi-volatile Organic Compounds USATHAMA UM16
benzoic acid
benzo(g,h,i,)perylene
benzo(a)p yrene
benzyl alcohol
bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-chlOroaniline
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
butyl benzyl phthalate
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
2-chloronaphthalene
2-chlorophenol
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
chrysene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
&benzofuran
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-&chlorobenzidine
2,4-dichlorophenol
diethylphthalate
2,4-dimethylphenol
dimethyl phthalate
di-n-butyl phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
2,4-dinitrophenol
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phthdate
fluoranthene
fluorene
hexachlorobenzene
hexachloro butadiene
hexachlorccyclopentene
hexachloroethane
indeno( 1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
isop horone
2-methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
4-methylphenol
naphthalene
2-nitroandine
30

Table 4 (cont.). Definition of Analytical Parameters and Analytical Methods
~
Acronym Labomtory Parameters Analytical Method
in text
Semi-VOCs (cont) 2) Semi-volatile Organic Compounds USATHAMA UM16
3-nitromaline
4-nitromaline
nitrobenzene
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
n-nitroso-di-n-dipropylamine
n-nitrosodiphenylamhe
pentachlorophenol
phenanthrene
phenol
PPne
1,2,4-ITichlorobenzene
2,4,5-ITichlorophenol
2,4,6-mchlorophenol
Metals
Tareet Analvte List Metals
1) ICP Metals
antimony
beryllium
cadmium
chromium
copper
nickel
thallium
zinc
2) GFAA Metals
lead
selenium
arsenic
silver
mercury
31
USATHAMA SS16(water)
USATHAMA JSlS(sed.)
US ATHAMA SD24(water)
USATHAMA JC03, ID13
(sed.)
USATHAMA SB03(water)
USATHAMA JB03 (sed.)

Table 4 (concluded.). Definition of Analytical Parameters and Analytical Methods
Acronym Laboratory Parameters Analytical Method
in text Water/Sedimen t
Herbicides
Herbicides
2,4-Dichlomphenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)
UW3 1LW29
2-CNor~4ethylamino-6-iso~ply~ino-5-m~ne
Explosives
Pentachlorphenol UJO4/LJO4
Lithium salt of Bromacil, in ethylene glycol, NA/NAa
ethanol and methanol (Hyvar X-L)
5-Bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil (Bmmacil)
Explosive Compounds
Octahydro-1,3,5,7-teamine (HMX) UW26/LW26
Hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro- 1.3.5-triazine (NIX)
2,4,6-TrinitrotoIuene 0
2,4,&TMimphenyl methylnitramine (Tenyl)
Leadazide
Lead styphnate
Lead mononiuoresorcinate
Mercury fulminate
2,4-Dinimtoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
Nitrates
Antimony sulfide
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
Temcene
Niuogly cerine
Nitroguanidine
NA/NAa
"NA indicates analytical method is still in development and not yet certified by USATHAMA
32

4.4 Groundwater Samulinz
Groundwater samples wil be collected using positive displacement bladder pumps
constructed of stainless steel and Teflon. hior to collecting a sample from a well, the well
will be purged to remove stagnant water and provide for a sample that is representative of
rhe true chemistry of the flowing groundwater. A minimum of five bore volumes will be
purged from each well prior to sampling.
While each well is being purged the discharge water will be monitored for tempera-,
elecmcal conductivity (EC), and pH. Temperature, EC, and pH probes will be installed in
a flow-through cell that is connected to the purge-water discharge line. Purging will be
considered complete when the indicator parameters have stabilized for one-half of a bore
volume.
For samples requiring preservation (Appendix B), the proper amount of preservative will
be added to the sample bottle prior to filling. Samples for dissolved-metals analysis will be
collected by installing an inline 0.45 micron cellulose-acetate filter camidge in the discharge
line. Sample bottles wil be filled by holding the sample bottle at and angle and placing the
discharge line at the lip of the bottle opening. The discharge water will be allowed to flow
gently down the side of the bottle without bubbling or cascading. This wil prevent
induced volatilization of organics. After filling a sample bottle, the bottle will be capped
and checked for air bubbles. If bubbles are present, the cap wil be removed and additional
sample water wil be added to the bottle so as to eliminate all bubbles. After bottles have
been capped and verified to be free of air bubbles, they wil be sealed with wax fdm and
cmled to 4 O c.
4.5 Groundwater-Elevation Measurements
Water-level elevation measwements will be made at each monitoring well prior to collecting
samples. This information, together with total well depths, will allow the sampling team to
calculate the minimum volume of water to be removed from the well during purging.
Water-level measurements will also be used in conjunction with surveyed well-casing
elevations to determine actual groundwater elevations relative to a common datum, such as
the National Geodetic 1928 Mean Sea Level Datum (1928 MSLD). Contour maps will then
be prepared from rhe groundwater elevation data. These maps will allow interpretation of
local groundwater flow directions at the Gate 19 Landfill and the DU Impact Area.
4.6 Decontamination Procedure5
All equipment used for the collection of water, sediment, or QNQC samples will be
decontaminated prior to first use at JPG and between use at each sample location at JPG.
For all durable parts, decontamination will include steam cleaning, a potable water rinse,
and a deionized @I) water rinse. Samples from the potable water and DI water sources
wiU be collected and analyzed for all project analytes prior to use for any decontamination
procedures. Upon USATHAMA approval of the results of these analyses, the tested water
supplies can be used for decontamination procedures.
33

Fragile parts, such as the Teflon bladders and seals used in submersible bladder pumps,
will not be steam cleaned during decontamination procedures. These components of the
sampling equipment will be decontaminated by a potable water wash followed by a DI
water rinse, only.
34

6.1 Introduction
6. QLJALITYCONTROL
This section provide a brief innoduction to the QNQC measures that will be adhered to
during the field work conducted during the SSSA. The objective of these measures is to
provide systematic control of all phases of the investigation including sample collection.
documentation, analysis and reporting. A detailed description of the QNQC procedures
that will govern the entire. SSSA project is provided in Volume El, RUFS Quality Control
Plan (QCP). The W S QCP has been adopted for this work because the field and
analytical work conducted during the SSSA is virtually identical to that conducted during
the RI/FS.
6.2 b p line Procedu res
Brief descriptions of the sampling procedixes are described in Section 4 of this document.
Detailed descriptions of these procedures are provided in Appendix A. Any deviations
from the procedures presented in this document will be noted in the field logbooks.
Explanations will include assessments of potential impacts to data quality.
6.3 Samule Control
6.3.1 Sample Identity
To maintain evidence of authenticity, the samples collected must be properly identified and
easily differentiated from other similar samples. Samples collected for JFG will be
identified by means of a label attached to the sample container. This label will include the
sample identification number, date collected, time collected, desired analyses, and the
samplers name. In addition, a tag will be attached to the sample container with the same
information as that recorded on the sample label. This sample tag will be kept in the project
evidentiary files.
6.3.2 Sample Custody
To maintain the integrity of the samples, it is necessary to demonstrate that the samples
were kept under custody from the time they were collected until the the they were
analyzd Chain of Sample Custody records (Figure 15) will be used to list all nansfers of
sample possession. This document will demonstrate that samples were in constant custody
between collection and analysis.
While the samples are being shipped, the shipping container will have custody seals placed
over the container opening to allow one to determine if the samples were tampered with
during shipment. the receiving laboratory will examine the seals upon anival and will
record the condition of the seals (intact, or compromised). Upon opening the container, the
condition of the sample containers will also be noted and recorded (i.e., broken or leaking
bottles, broken seals on lids, etc.).
36

I i
I

6.4 Document Control
6.4.1 Introduction
To maintain QA/QC standards, all field activities will be documented using a combination
of field logbooks, and data collection forms. Sampling teams wil maintain smct control of
these documents at all times to prevent tampering. The specific documents that will be
maintained during the SSSA are described in this section.
6.4.2 Field Logbooks
Bound logbooks with consecutively numbered pages will be used by field personnel for all
sampling activities. The logbooks wil be used to record the daily activities of each field
team, record any field measurements taken, sketch sample location maps, and note
observations relevant to the quality of the data or sample. Each page will be signed and
dated by the person making the entries on that page and will also be signed and dated by a
second person who has reviewed the entries for clarity and accuracy.
Each logbook that is issued will be signed out by the individual responsible for completion
of the logbook this record will be part of the overall Document Conwl Log. When the
logbooks are returned, the receiver will sign and date the rehun.
6.4.3 Instrument Calibration Log
An instrument calibration log will be kept for instruments requiring daily calibration or
operational checks. This log will ensure that the data obtained are within established
QNQC limits. Included in the logbook wil be the date of the calibration, the type of
calibration performed, standards used, and the QA limits established for each inshvment
Instruments that fail calibration or operational checks wil be tagged "DO NOT USE."
6.4.4 Groundwater Sample Collection Forms
A groundwater sample collection form will be completed for each sampling location
(Figure 16). This form is a comprehensive form that documents water quality field
measurements taken during the purging and sampling of individual wells. Information
recorded includes water-quality indicator parameters, pump type, purge volumes and rates,
and types of sample bottles preservatives and filters used.
6.4.5 Chain-of-Custody Forms
A copy of each chain-of-custody form (Figure 15) will be rctained in a project field-fde in
order to provide traceability in the event of sample loss or delay during shipment. This fie
wlll be maintained in the field uti1 completion of the fieldwork, and then will become part
of the permanent project files after completion of the project. Copies received by the
laboratory will also be maintained in a project file until completion of the analytical work,
after which they will be transferred to the permanent project files.
38

,Y ...... -
I T H TO WATER: Ft. I CASING DIA.:-
I Volume Removed
Time
. -- 4-+ I
IC-
Gals 11 Csng VolS
I I I I
Figure 16. Groundwater sample collection form (front side).
SCREENED INTERVAL:

WATER QUAL. A (CONTINUED) PAGE
Figurc 16 (cont.). Groundwater sample collection form (back side).
40

6.4.6 Project Evidentiary File
The project manager, or designee, wil maintain a project file that will include all pertinent
information gathered during field and laboratory work. This will include access permits,
project correspondence, completed data forms and logbooks, raining records accident
reports and other records and files required to maintain a complete record of all project
activities.
6.5 -3 li ml
6.5. 1 Field QC Samples
Field QC samples wiIl include field duplicates, equipment blanks, and trip blanks. Field
duplicates are defined as duplicate samples of the media being sampled. Equipment blanks
are samples prepared using the cleaned sampling equipment to collect and bottle a sample OF
the media of interest known to contain no contaminants. The typical approach to collecting
equipment blanks for water sampling equipment is to use deionized water that is passed
through pumps and filters used during normal sampling. Equipment blanks for soil or
sediment sampling are prepared using deionized water as a rinsate over the sampling
equipment Trip blanks are clean samples that are prepared prior to departure to the field.
These samples are carried throughout the field work phase and are submitted to the
laboratory either during or after completion of the field work. Trip blanks provide checks
on the potential for sample botde contamination or laboratory contamination of samples
after receipt Field QC samples (excluding trip blanks) wil be prepared at the rate of 1 set
per 20 samples or one set per batch, which ever is greater. A batch is defrned as a group of
like samples collected on the same day, from the same media (e.g., surface water), and
scheduled for the same set of analyses.
6.5.2 Laboratory QC Samples
Laboratory QC sample requirements are a function of the classification of the analytical
method (USA-, 1990). ALI USATHAMA laboratory QC requirements specified in
Section 11 of USATHAMA (1990) wil be adhered to. These Laboratory QC requirements
are described in greater detail in Volume IU, W S Quality Control Plan.
41

7. HEALTH AND SAFETY
Health and safety protocols that will be adhered to during SSSA field work at JPG are
presented in Voolwne W, RIIFS Health and Safety Plan. This plan has been adopted for
coverage of health and safety issues during the SSSA because the field work tasks
conducted during this investigation virtually identical to those that will be conducted during
the planned W S. The RIIFS Health and Safety Plan is a comprehensive plan that
describes the health and safety responsibilities of CNES personnel, protective equipment
requirements, potential contaminants and their exposure limits, emergency response plans,
and spill abatement and cleanup procedures.
To ensure that field personnel understand the health and safety requirements and are aware
of the potential health and safety hazards posed by the SSSA activities, the Field Manager
will conduct daily health and safety briefings. These briefings will address the most
significant health and safety concerns posed by the sampling activities planned for the given
day.
All personnel wil have received the 4o-hour Hazardous Waste Site Safety Training course
from a certified instructor.
42
,

8. REFERENCES
Ebasco Environmental, 1990a. Enhanced Preliminan Assessment Report: Jefferson
ProvinE Ground. Madison, Indiana; prepared for U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous
Materials Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, March, 1990.
Ebasco Environmental, 1990b. Maste r Environmental Plan: Jeffcrson Provi np Grou n d
mison. Ind iana; prepared for U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, November, 1990.
Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc., 1989. Remedial Investitation at Jefferson
Provine Ground. Draft Technical Report A01 1; prepared for U.S. Army Toxic and
Hazardous Materials Agency, Aberdeen Roving Ground, Maryland, January, 1989.
Hartke, E. J., 1989. Geologv of Jefferson Provine Ground Indiana Department of
Natural Resources.
Nuclear Regulatory License and permit Application for DU Impact Area (to be provided).
ONeill, J. E., 1978. Environmental Impact Assessment of Jefferson Proving Ground,
Department of the Army, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, Jefferson
Proving Ground, Inbana.
U.S. A my Corps of Engineers, 1988. RCRA Part B Permit Application for ODen
BwnindChx n Der0 nation; Nashville Tennessee.
-1 1991. Closure of Jefferson Provin~ Ground. Indiana and Realienment to Yuma
Provinr Ground, Arizona: Environmental Imuact Statement mol. 1 and 2L p~pared
by the Louisville District
USAEHA, 1988. Interim Final Report. G roundwater Contamination Survev No. 38-26-
aO6-89. Evaluation of Solid Waste Management Units. Jefferson Provine Ground
Madison, Indiana.
USATHAMA, 1990. U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agencv. Ouality
Assurance Promm; USATHAMA, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, January,
1990.
US. Department of Agriculture and Soil Conservation Service, 1985a. Soil Survev of
Jennines Countv. Indiana.
-7 198Sb. Soil Survev of RiDlev Counm and Part of Jenninns Countv. Indiana.
-_-, 198Sc. Soil Survev of Jefferson Countv. Indiana,
U.S. Department of Interior, 1985. An Archeolopical Overview and Manaeement Plan for
Jefferson Proving Ground. Jefferson. JenninEs and Ridev Counties. Indiana;
National Park Service, Contract No. CX-5OOO-3-0771.
43

U.S. Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC), 1986. Installation
bsment Relcmk Promam Workine Document. Jefferson Provine Ground.
Madison. Indiana; Warrenton, Virginia, TS-PIC-85X.
US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1986. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste. SW-846, Third Edition, November, 1986.
-9 1988. Draft Guidance fo r Conducting Remedial Invesh ‘eations and Feasibility
Studies Under CERCLA; OSWER Directive 9335.3-01.
-1 1989a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Sumrfund. Vol I: Human Health Evaluation
Manual Part Al; EPA 540/1-89/001.
-. 1989b. Risk Assessment Guidance -d
for
Evaluation Manual; EPA 540/1-89/002.
. n nm
--. 1990. Environmental Audit: Jefferson hovine Ground. Madison. Indianr.
prepared by the National Enforcement Investigations Center, Denver, Colorado, EPA-
330/2-90-019.
44

DETAILED PROCEDURES FOR FLELD SAMPLIh'G AND
DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITlES

INTRODUCTION
SURFACE SOIL SAMPLLVG
For samples to be collected from a depth of 0-6 inches, a stainless steel scoop or trowel will
be used for sample collection. For samples over 6 inches in depth, a hand-operated stainless
steel barrel auger will be used. The barrel auger maintains a consistent sample volume and
allows better depth control. Sediment sampling at P G wiU also employ this procedure since
the stream drainages at PG are shallow and often dry.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Samples will be obtained for the determination of the presence or absence of chemical
contamination in the near-surface soil environment. The sampling equipment used and the
procedures are designed to minimize the potential for crossantamination between samples
and to obtain samples of a relatively uniform depth and volume.
APPARATUS
Surface soil sampling will utilize a stainless steel spoon, scoop, or trowel to excavate a hole
over a small area (< 1 foot) to a depth of 6 inches. The barrel auger consists of a stainless
stml, 3-inchdiameter auger tube with cutting tips hardened and sharpened to penetrate the
soil. Attached to the upper end of the auger barrel is a threaded stainless steel extension rod
to which a T-handle is attached. The auger assembly is rotated by hand in a clockwise
..
direction.
PROCEDURE
1. Clear immediate sampling area of debris or litter.
2. For the spoon or scoop method, first collect samples for VOC analysis by placing the
sample material directly into the sample container with minimal head space to
minimize VOC loss. Place remaining material in a precleaned stainless steel pan and
thoroughly mix the material with a stainless steel spoon. Place the mixed sample into
1%
the appropriate sample containers.
3. For the barrel auger sampling method, auger to the desired sampling depth. When
the desired depth is reached, remove the auger. If a Sample for voc 2JldySiS is
required, remove the matend immediately using a stainless steel spoon and place in
the appropriate container with no headspace to prevent volatile loss. Place the
remainder of the sample material in a precleaned stainless steel pan and mix
thoroughly with the spoon. Transfer the sample mated from the pan to the
appropriate containers with the spoon.
A-1

10.
4. With a clean paper towel, clean the outside threads of the bottle prior to placing the
lid on the bottle, since dirty threads often result in a poor seal. A tight seal is
essential to prevent escape of the sample or specific chemical contaminants within the
sample.
5. Wrap a seaI of parafilm tape around the bottle and lid to secure the lid.
6. Measure the actual sampring depth using a steel measuring tape and record on the soil
sample log sheet.
7. Note any unusual characteristics observed such as color, texture, or odor on the log
sheet.
8. Record the sampling time, date, sampler’s name, sample ID number, and requested
analytical parameters on the sample bottles and sample log sheet. Once the sample
tag is completed for each container, cover the tag with clear tap to protect it from
moisture.
9. Prepare and store the samples as specified in Section 5.4.3 of the Samphg Design
Plan.
Decontaminate all sampling equipment that came into Contact with potentidy
contaminated materials as specified in the decontamination procedures described in
Section 5.7 of the Sampling Design Plan.
A-2

MEASUREMENT OF WATER LEVELS
n\J GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
Water-level measurements will be taken prior to any sampling or well purging. These
measurements are needed to determine the casing volume of water in the well; the data is
used when interpreting the monitoring results. High water levels could indicate recent
recharge to the system, resulting in dilution of the sample. Low water levels may reflect the
influence of nearby production wells. Documentation of the non-pumping water levels will
also provide historical information on the hydraulic conditions at the site.
SCOPE
The water-level measurements will be made from the top of the well casing and, for
consistency, will always be made from the same spot on the well casing (typically on the
north side of the casing).
Two methods are provided for water-level measurements. The fust utilizes an electric
sounder with a conductivity cell.. When the cell contacts water, it completes an electrical
circuit and sounds a buzzer or lights a lamp. The second method uses an interface probe.
This instrument has an optical liquid sensor and a conductiviq cell and can distinguish
between the presence of a nonconductive layer (Le., oils and fuels) and a conductive layer.
With this instrument, the sampler can measure the thickness of a light-phase immiscible
(floater) or dense-phase immiscible (sinker) layer.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Accurate measurements of water depth are necessary to calculate well-bore volumes;
measurements are typically made to the nearest 0.01 foot.
.4PPARATUS
Electric Sounder or Interface Probe (many commercial brands are available)
PROCEDURE
1 Ensure that the sounder or interface probe is clean by rinsing with distilled water and
wiping clean with a lint-free disposable tissue.
2. Perform a battery check.
A-3
3 %

3
4.
5.
6.
-
Slowly lower the probe into the well until the indicator sounds or lights. In the case
of the interface probe, a continuous audible alarm indicates an immiscible non-
conductive liquid and an oscillating a lm indicates water.
Raise the probe slightly until the indicator stops sounding or the light goes off.
Lower the probe again until the indicator sounds and read the depth to the nearest
0.01 foot. Repeat this step until a repeatable measurement is achieved (to the nearest
0.01 foot).
If a dense-phase immiscible layer is suspected, it can be measured by slowly lowering
the interface probe to the bottom of the well. If the layer is present, it can be
measured by recording the point at which the continuous alarm begins and the point
that the probe reaches the bottom of the well.
Slowly withdraw the probe from the well while wiping the tape with a clean lint-free
tissue moistened with distilled water.
/. Clean the probe by rinsing with distilled water and wiping dry with a lint-free tissue.
A-4

__ INTRODUCTION
PURGING OF MONJTOlUl?G WELIS
To obtain a representative groundwater sample, the stagnant water in the well casing must be
removed. The recommended amount of purging depends on many factors such as the
hydrogeological nature of the aquifer, the characteristics of the well, the type of m phg
equipment to be used, and the parameter to be sampled. USATHAMA requirements call for
the purging of five bore-volumes. In addition to the established number of bore volumes,
water quality parameters of pH, conductivity, and temperature will be measured to indicate
when the stagnant water has been sufficiently removed (the measurementS stabilize).
SCOPE
The four methods described here are representative of those generally used to purge
monitoring wells. Each method has advantages and disadvantages that must be considered.
Proper selection will be based on such variables as the total volume of material to be
removed, depth of water to be removed, and chemical contaminants present.
STGMF7CANCE AND USE
Water may become stagnant in a well and wil not reflect the local resident water’s chemical
and physical properties. The purging of a well can reduce this bias. Care shall be taken to
allow screened intervals to come to equilibrium before sampling is performed.
CAT,CTJLATION OF VOLUME OF STANDING WATER W THE WELL
Calculations are performed for the amount of water in the well with the following formula:
? x 7 x (h1 - h2) x 7.48 = gallons per casing volume
where
r = radius of well casing (feet)
hl = depth of well (feet) from the top of the well casing
h2 = depth to water (feet) measured from the top of the well casing
A -5
1 *

WELL PURGING PROCEDURES
Peristaltic Pump
Apparatus:
PeristaItic-type pump
Silicone or neoprene tubing for pump head
Silicone, Teflon, polyethylene, or vinyl tubing for placing in the well
Generator or other source of electricity
Procedure:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Place the suction line in the well so it is just below the liquid surface.
Connect the suction line to the pump.
Connect the pump outlet to the in-line flow c d or phce the pump outlet hose. into an
open container to be used to make the field measurements of pH, conductivity, and
temperature.
Place calibrated pH, conductivity, and temperature electrodes into the in-line flow cell
or the open container.
Initiate pumping and follow the water level down the well bore if the recovery rate of
the well is below the pumping rate. Discharge hose should be placed in the tank or
barrel for containment.
Routinely monitor and record the volumes purged and the readings for the pH,
conductivity, and temperature.
When the calculated volume of water in five bore-volumes has been purged from the
well, discontinue pumping. Sampling can now begin.
Remove the suction line from the well if sampling is not to be accomplished with the
pump (i.e., sampling with a bailer).
Decontaminate the equipment according to the procedure described in Section 5.7 of
the Sampling Design Plan.
NOTE: Purging with a peristaltic pump is normally limited to situations where the water
levels are less than about 25 feet. Also degassing occurs using this method when there is a
head difference between the pump and the water level.
A-6

Bladder-type Pump
Apparatus:
Bladder-type pump
Air compressor
Teflon, polyethylene, or vinyl tubing for the air and sample line
Procedure:
1. Lower the pump gently to a position just above the screened interval.
2. Connect the air line to the pump conh-oller.
3. Connect the pump outlet to an in-line flow cell or place the pump outlet hose in an
open container used to make field measurements.
4. Place calibra& pH, conductivity, and temperature electrodes in the flow cell or the
open container.
5.
Initiate pumping and routinely monitor and record the volume purged and the pH,
conductivity, and temperature measurements.
6. During pumping, discharge the water to a containment tank or %-gallon barrels.
7. When five bore-volumes have been purged from the well, discontinue pumping.
8. Remove the pump from the well and decontaminate all purging equipment according
to decontamination procedures described in Section 5.7 of the Sampling Design Plan.
NOTE Pumping rates for this type of pump are typically slow, there is a high rate of air
consumption, and decontamination of the equipment is more difficult than with other
methods.
a r
Apparatus:
Teflon or Stainless Steel Bailer
Teflon or Stainless Steel Cable or Line
Bailer Reel
A-7
'.

Procedure:
1. Attach the bailer to the cable or line which is contained on a handled reel.
2. Lower the bailer until it contacts the liquid.
3. Allow the bailer to sink until it is totally submerged.
4. Slowly raise the bailer to the surface.
5. Tip the bailer or use a bottomemptying device and fill a container in which calibrated
pH, conductivity, and temperature probes have been placed.
6.
Continue bailing and emptying until five bore volumes have been bailed. As the
container is Ned, the purge water will be transferred to a larger container (i.e., tank
or 55-gallon drum) for containment and storage. Measurements of pH, conductivity,
and temperature will be made periodically in the smaller container (typically a 5-
gallon bucket):
7. Clean and decontaminate the bailer as required. If the well has a dedicated bailer, the
bailer will not have to be decontaminated.
NOTE: Use of a bailer for deep or large diameter wells is labor intensive and time
consuming. Degassing, aeration, and turbulance will occur with this method. Also, it is
difficult to determine the depth to which the bailer has been submerged.
Submersible Pump
Apparatus:
Submersible-type Pump
Discharge tubing of vinyI, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, or Teflon
Power source of generator or batteries
Procedure:
1. Set up the pump according to the manufacturer’s operating manual.
2. Gently lower the pump down the well so that the pump head is submerged sufficiently
and will not run dry.
3. Connect the pump outlet to an in-line flow cell or place the pump outlet in
container used for field measurements.
A-8
i t ..
open

4. Place calibrated pH, conductivity, and temperature electrodes in the flow Ceu or the
open container.
5.
Initiate pumping and continue pumping until five bore volumes have been purged.
Discharge will be placed in taxk or 55-gallqn drums for containment and storage.
During pumping, continue to monitor pH, conductivity, and temperature.
6. Remove the pump from the well and decontaminate the equipment according to
decontamination procedures described in Section 5.7 of the Sampkg Design Plan.
NOTE: The high pumping rate and the mechanical action of this type of pump causes
turbulence, aeration, and degassing of the water. Also these pumps are d y damaged by
dry pumping. The equipment may be difficult to clean and decontaminate.
The following infomiation must be recorded prior to or during the p d g of a well:
0
e
e
e
0
0
e
e
e
0
Depth to water
Depth of well
Well diameter or radius
Calculated water volume
Type of equipment used to evacuate the well
Date
Well ID
Name of person@ performing the purghg
Total volume purged
pH, conductivity, and temperature measurements and time or volume when taken
A-9

CALIBRATION
In each case, samplers will follow the manufacturer’s instructions for the pH meter and
electrode used. Electrodes shall be kept wet when not in use. Recommended solutions for
storage are the pH 4.00 or pH 7.00 buffer.
Before use, remove electrode from the storage solution, rinse with distilled water, and blot
dry with a lint-free tissue.
Adjust buffer solution and electrode to +/- 10°C of the sample temperature. This can be
done by storing the buffer solutions and electrode in an ice chest or by letting sample water
run over the buffer bottles and electrode until the temperatures have equilibrated.
Place the electrode in the pH 7.00 buffer, adjust the temperature compensation control to the
temperature of the buffer, and adjust the calibration control to read the pH of the buffer.
The pH of the buffer is equal to 7.00 only at 25°C; therefore, it is necessary to use the
temperature-correction cume supplied by the manufacturer of the buffer.
Remove the electrode from the 7.00 buffer, rinse with distilled water, and blot dry. Place
the electrode in either the pH 4.00 or the pH 10.00 buffer, bracketing the expected pH of the
sample. Allow the reading to stabilize before making adjustments. Adjust the slope control
to read the correct pH, again consulting the temperaturearrection curve suppried by the
manufacturer.
Rinse electrode with distilled water and blot dry. Rxheck the value of the pH 7.00 buffer.
The value must be within fl- 0.02 pH of the correct value. If not, repeat the calibration.
MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
1. Consult the instrument-specific operating manual for equipment setup and operational
checks. Perform any pre-measurement checks and calibrations according to
manufacturer’s operating procedures.
2.
Rinse the calibrated electrode with distilled water, blot dry, and immerse the electrode
i.
in the solution to be measured.
3. Use of a flow cell is recommended for making pH measurements; this reduces the
interferences due to atmospheric contamination. If possible, in-situ measurements are
best.
4. Allow the measurement to stabilize and record the reading.
5. Remove the electrode from the solution, rinse with distilled water, blot dry, and store
in pH 4.00 or pH 7.00 buffer solution.
A-11

DOCUMENTATION
0
0
Log the time of the last two-buffer calibration. This calibration should be performed
a minimum of once each hour.
Record the buffer temperature at time of calibration.
Record sample temperature at time of measurement
Measurement type (in-situ, open container, air-exclusion container)
Source and expiration date of buffers used
Instrument manufacturer and model number
Name of person performing the measurement, date, and time
A-12
i;

INTRODUCTION
MEASUREMENT OF SPECILlC CONDUCTANCE
Specific conductance is a widely used indicator of water quality. It measures the ability of
water to carry an electrid current under specific conditions. This ability depends on the
presence of ions, their total concentration mobility, and temperature. Specific conductance is
a simple indicator of change within a system and is used as an aid in evaluating whether a
sample is representative of the water in the system.
SCOPE
This procedure describes the field measurement of the specific conductance of an aqueous
sample. The specific conductance is measured using a conductance meter and a pIatinum or
stainless steel electrode.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
The specific conductance or conductivity of a sample is defined as the conductance of the
sample between opposite sides of a cube, 1 centimeter (cm) in each direction. Because it is
impractical to build electrodes with these characteristics, electrodes are manufactured in
various forms. A cell constant is determined by measuring a solution of known conductivity.
Solutions of known conductivity are purchased or can be made from reagent-grade KCL.
Samplers will consult operating instructions for the specific instrument used for the
determination of the cell constant. This conductivity is expressed in micromhos per
centimeter Gmhoslcm).
WTERFERENCES
Temperature, ionic strength, and the determination of the cell constant are features that affect
the measurement of conductivity.
The conductivity of a solution increases with temperature at approximately 2 percent per
degree C. Significant errors can result from inaccurate temperature measurements. If the
conductivity meter does not have automatic temperature correction, the sampler can use the
foilowing formula to correct the conductivity reading for temperature.
where
K = EM
1 + 0.0191(t-25)
K = corrected conductivity in fimhos/cm,
EM = measured conductivity in pmhos/cm, and
t = temperature in "C
A-13

The conductivity of a solution is a function of the concentration and charge of the ions in
solution and of the rate the ions move under the influence of an electrical potential. AS the
ionic strength increases, the rate the individual ions move decreases. Conductivity vark
Linearly with ionic strength for values below 1,OOO pmhoslcm. As conductivity increases
above 5,000 pmhoslcm, the line C U N ~ significantly; beyond 50,000 pmhodcm, the
conductivity is an unsatisfactory index of ionic concentration.
The cell constant will be checked and verified on a regular basis. A significant change in the
cell constant indicates that the electrode needs cleaning or changing. Consult the instrument
operating manual for procedures to check the cell constant.
APPARATUS
0
0
Specific conductance meter - capable of measuring conductivity in the range of 0 to
100,000 pmhoslcm and temperatures in the range of -5°C to 50°C
Conductivity check solutions (0.001N, O.OlN, and 0.1N KCL)
Distilled or deionized water in a squeeze bottle *.
Disposable beakers, test tubes, or centrifuge tubes
Lint-free tissue
PROCDURE
1. Rinse the conductivity cell and temperature probe with several volumes of sample
water.
2. Immerse the probe and cell in the sample.
3. Allow the readings to stabilize and record the temperam and conductivity readings
on the field log form.
4.
Remove the probes from the solution, rinse with distiued water, blot dry, and store
according to the manufacturer’s procedures.
DOCUMENTATION
14.
Record the source and expiration date of standards used
List instrument manufacturer and model number
Record date and time of calibration check
0 Record temperature and conductivity of standards used to check calibration
Record sample temperature and conductivity readings
List the name of the person performing the measurement(s)
A-14

INTRODUCTION
FIELD MEASUREMENT OF TEMPERATURE
Temperature readings are important for numerous applications. They are used in the
measurement of Eh, pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen; and in saturation and stability
studies. It is important to know the temperature of surface waters and groundwaters for the
accurate geochemical evaluation of equilibrium thermodynamics. Temperature readings of
+I- 1°C are necessary for the above applications.
SCOPE
This procedure gives general guidance and recommendations that will be considered when
taking a temperature measurement. There are numerous instruments on the market that can
provide adequate temperature measurements. Each instrument operating manual should be
consulted for detailed procedures.
- SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Temperature is a basic physical property that is measured by the response of matter to heat.
There are many devices that, once calibrated, are acceptable for taking temperature
measurements. These devices include liquid in glass (mercury in glass), thermocouples,
bimetallic, and electrical-resistance thermometers. At a minimum, the device should
measure temperature to +/- 0.1"C readability.
APPARATUS
Temperature measuring device
0 Distilled or deionized water in a squeeze wash bottle
0 Lint-free tissue
PROCEDURE
1. The temperature measuring device should be calibrated according to the instrument
operating manual supplied by the manufacturer of the device. 1 '
2. Rinse the thermometer with distilled or deionized water and blot dry.
5 Immerse the thermometer in the sample.
4. Allow the reading to stabilize and record the temperature.
A-15

DOCUMENTATION
0
0
0
Record the manufacturer and model of the instrument used.
Record the temperature measurement of the sample.
List the name of the person performing the measurement, time, and date.
A-16

INTRODUCTION
STANDARD PRACTICE FOR THE SAMTLING OF LIQUIDS
The type of sampling equipment used for sampling liquids at IFG will depend on the sample to
be collected, which analytes the sample is being collected for, and the site-specific requirements
such as depth to water, depth of well, etc. Because each sampling situation is unique, the
equipment used and its application may have to be modified to ensure that a representative
sample is collected and it physical and chemicaI integrity is maintained.
$COPE
The procedures listed here are used to collect liquid samples. There are several methods that
can be used to collect liquid samples. Some sampling situations use a combination of these
methods. For example, a peristaltic pump could be used to collect the inorganic samples and
a bailer used to collect the organic samples. The methods likely to used at PG are:
0 sampling with a Peristaltic Pump
0 Sampling with a Bladder Pump
0 sampling with a Bailer
0 sampling with a Submersible Pump
0 sampling by Container Immersion
-E AND USE
The usefulness and limi&tions for each of the first four sampling methods are described as
follows:
Peristaltic Pump:
Advantage Dlsadvantage
Flow rates are easily adjustable.
Devics has no amtact with the sample.
Device can ba used in wells of any diameter.
High flow rates are obtainable for well purging.
Only the tubing requires cleaning
(peristaf6c pumps only).
A-17
Use is limited to situations dere the liquid level is less
than 25 feet blow the SUlfaCa.
Drop in pressure of sudion-liftmechanisms causes
degasing of the sample and loss of volatiles.
Choice of construction material is limited.
Centrifugal pumps need to be primed. resulting in
pssible sample contamination.
Severe aeration and tudxhmce oaxlr with
cenbifugal pump.

Bladder Pump:
Advantage Disadvantage
Pump Is construded of inert materials: most pumps are Oeep sampling requires large volumes of gas and
designed speakally to sample for low levels of longer cydes. thus increasing operating time and
mntaminants. e,yxnse and reduang portability.
Driving gas does not contact the sample, thus
Chedtvakes in some dels are subjacf to failure
minimizing sample aeration and gas stripping.
in water with high solids content
Pump Is portable. Wugh accessory equipmerrt may be Mmta~'Mle mcdelsare expensive.
cumbersome.
Minimum rate of sample discharge of some
RelaLi'eiy high pumping rate allows well evacuation
models may be higher than ideal for sampling of
and cdleaion of large sample volumes.
volatile compounds.
Sample delivery rate can be controlled easily on
some models.
Most modeis are capable of pumping lifts in excess
of 200 feet
Pump diameters are variable. depending on
lhe application.
Pump Is easily disassembled for deaning.
Hailer:
Advantage Disadvantage
Virtually MY mate& on be used for consfruction.
Sampling is laborintensive and tirnewnsurning.
D& Is inexpensive. Aeration, degasing. andturbulence oocur .
No exiemal power source is required.
Mechanism can be conmed m any size and shape.
during sampling.
Sampler Is susceptible to exposure to any contaminants
Dew is easy to us and easily dean& requires liie
training for operation and liie maintenance.
hth8 Sall@e.
Device does not pmvide a continuous supply of sample.
Submersible PornD:
~- ~
..
..
.._
Advantage Dlsadvantage
~
High pumping rates are possible for well purging.
Pump can be used at depths of mare than 200 feet
Sampler has We control of Row ratesinot possible
to adjust fmm a high rate for purging to a low rate
for sampling.
Severe aeration and degasing of sample OC~ZITS. thus
vdatiling organics and other sensitive compounds.
Pump has limited portabilii and requires a power
souw for operation.
Pump is no1 easily disassembled for deaning.
'

METHOD 1 - SAMPLING WITH PERISTALTIC PUMP
Auuaratus
0
0
0
Procedure
Peristaltic-type pump
Silicone, C-Flex, or Norprene tubing for the pump head
Silicone, Teflon, polyethylene, or vinyl tubing for the suction line (placed in sample
liquid)
Generator or other source of electricity
1. Place the suction Line in the liquid to be sampled. If sampling a monitoring well,
place the tubing just above the screened interval.
2.
3.
4.
Connect the suction line to the pump.
Turn on the pump and adjust the flow late so sample turbulence is at a minimum.
Allow several liters to flow and recheck stability parameters (i.e., pH, conductivity,
temperature).
Fill the necessary sample bottles by allowing the pump discharge to flow gently down
the side of the bottle with minimal turbulence.
5. Label, preserve, and document the sample as required.
6. Remove the tubing from the liquid and clean and decontaminate equipment as
required.
NOTE: Sampling organics using a peristaltic pump is not recommended. The suction lift
action will strip volatiles and degas the sample. Also the tubing tends to absorb some
organics and slowly releases them, contaminating subsequent samples.
METHOD 2 - BLADDER PUMP
Luuaratus
Bladder-type pump
Air compressor
Teflon, polyethylene, or vinyl tubing for the air and sample line
A-I9
.

Procedure
1.
2.
3.
4.
Lower the pump gently to a position just above the screened interval.
Connect the air line to the pump controller.
Initiate pumping and allow several liters of water to be pumped prior to sample
collection (recheck stability parameters of pH, conductiviq, and temperature).
Fill the necessary sample bottles by allowing the pump discharge to flow gently down
the side of the bottle with minimal disturbance.
5. Label, preserve, and document the sample as required.
6. Remove the pump from the well and clean and decontaminate as required.
METHOD 3 - SAMPLWG WITH A BAKER
Apaaratus
0 Teflon or stainless steel bailer
Teflon or stainless steel cable or line
0 Bailer reel and tripod
Procedure
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Attach a properly pre-cleaned bailer to the cable or line.
Lower the bailer slowly until it contacts the liquid.
Allow the bailer to sink until it reaches the screened interval of the well or the desired
sampling depth.
Slowly raise the bailer to the surface.
Tip the bailer or use a bottom-emptying device and fill a container to recheck the
stability parameters @H, conductivity, and temperature).
Repeat the bailing procedure as many times as necessary to fill the required sample
bottles.
Clea and decontaminate the bailer as required.
NOTE: A bottom-emptying device is recommended for the collection of volatile organic
compounds using a bailer.
A-20
.I

METHOD 4 - SAMPLING WITH A SUBMERSJBLE PUMP
Apparatus
0 Submersible-type pump
Discharge tubing of vinyl, polyethylene, or Teflon
Power source of generator or batteries
Procedure
1. Set up the pump according to the operating manual.
2. Gently lower the pump to a position just above the screened interval.
3. Initiate pumping and allow several tubing volumes of liquid to be pumped pnor to
sample collection. Recheck stability parameters (pH, conductivity, and temperahire).
4. Fill the necesk sample bottles by allowing the pump discharge to flow gently down
the side of the bottle with minimal turbulence.
5. Label, preserve, and document the samples as required.
6. Remove the pump, dean and decontaminate as required.
NOTE: Considerable agitation results when using a submersible pump. Submersible pumps
are not recommended for the collection of dissolved gases, organics, or oxidatiodreduction
sensitive samples. They also have a higher potential of sample contamination because of the
construction material.
METROD 5 - SAMPLJNG BY CONTAINER IMMERSION
Auuaratus
Procedure
Sample Containers
Disposable gloves ( type(s) as specified in the Health and Safety Plan)?
Distilled water in a squeeze bottle
Lint-free tissues
1. After putting on the appropriate gloves, rinse the sample container three times with
the liquid to be sampled.
2.
Submerge the sample bottle below the liquid surface. If the liquid is flowing, point
the bottle upstream.
A-21

3. Allow the container to fill to the desired volume.
4. Remove the container, cap, and rinse the container's outside surface with distilled
water and dry with a clean tissue.
5. Label and preserve the sample as required.
NOTE: For sampIes collected for VOC analysis, fill the bottle with zero air space. After
capping, turn the bottle over and check for bubbles. If present, the procedure must be
repeated.
A-22

COLLECTION, FILTRATION AND PRESERVATION OF LIQUID SAMPLES
INTRODUCTION
Many factors should be considered during the sample-collection phase. These factors include
bottle type, bottle size, preservative, whether the sample should be filtered, in what order the
samples -should be collected, etc. The procedures listed here are presented to cover the
sampling requirements anticipated for JF'G.
SCOPE
This procedure covers the collection, fiItration, and preservation of Liquid samples. Provided
are general collection procedures, specific colIection procedures for the collection of
organics, prdures for sample filtration, and procedures for sample preservation.
SIGNIFZCANCE AND USE
Table 1 (from Table'H-1 of the USATHAMA QAP) lists many of the standard methods for
sample preservation and bottles that may be required for sample collection. Improper
bottling, filtration, or preservation may compromise the integrity of the Sample.
APPARATUS
Sample bottles
Sample labels
Preservative solutions (see Table 1)
Dispensers for preservative solutions
Coolers and ice for storing collected samples at 4°C
In-line filter holders and filters of 0.45 micrometer pore size
GENERAL SAMPLE COLLKTION PROCEDURES
1.
2.
3.
4.
All samples will be collected as close to the source as possible.
Choose the appropriate bottles for the analytes needed (Table 1). Vi?dy inspect the
bottle for cleanliness, breaks, or missing parts prior to sampling.
Label the bottles as required under the Sampling Design Plan.
Collect the samples by allowing the liquid to flow gently down the side of the bottle
with minimal turbulence. Unfiltered samples will be collected prior to filtered
samples.
A-23

5. Unfiltered samples should be collected in the following order:
0 Volatile organics and total organic halides
Dissolved gases and total organic &n
0 Large-volume samples for organic compounds
0 Sensitive inorganics (Le., NO2-, NH,+, F a )
Totalmetals
6. Filtered samples should be collected in the following order:
Alkali&
Sensitive inorganics
0 Tracemetals
0 Major catiodanions
7. Add preservatives as required.
8. Cap the bottle'securely. Rinse the outside surface with distill2 water and wipe dry
with a clean lint-free tissue.
9. Store as required. Most samples require storage at 4°C immediately after wllection.
A cooler with ice will be used for field storage and transport.
Samplinp Non-Volatile Organics
..
1 I Samples
for non-volatile organics are collected directly into the sampler container.
The container will be cleaned to EPA standards or purchased from a supplier that has
them pre-cleaned to EPA standards (Le., I-CHEM). Do not Nter samples for
organics.
2. Choose the appropriate bottle for the analyte(s) requested.
3. Label the bottle as required by the Sampling Design Plan.
4. Add preservative to the bottle, if required.
5. Slowly fill the bottle by allowing the liquid to flow gently down the side of the bottle
with minimal turbulence.
6. Cap the bottle securely.
7. Store as required at 4°C.
A-24
I!

Sampling for Volatile Organics
1. When sampling for volatile organics, special care will be taken during collection of
the sample to reduce the possibility of significant loss of volatile constituents.
Volatile organics should be the first samples collected. They are collected in a 40-
milliliter (mL) vial that has a Teflon-lined, siliconeseptum lid.
2. Properly label the bottle.
3. Slowly fill the bottle to overflowing.
4. Hold the container level and place the septum Teflon-side down on the convex water
meniscus and seal with the screw cap.
5. Test the seal by inverting the vial and lightly tapping. There are to be no bubbles
entrapped in the sample. If bubbles are present, uncap the container. add additional
sample, and reseal as stated above.
..
SAMPLE FILTRATION PROCEDURE
Samples requiring filtration wiIJ be collected after unfiltered samples. To maintain closed-
system conditions, an in-line membrane filter is connected directly to the pump outlet. This
allows the sample to be filtered prior to atmospheric contact, which could alter the sample.
A fitter pore size of 0.45 pm is used for sample filtration.
1.
2.
Connect the in-line filter directly to the pump outlet.
Start the pump and discard the first 100 mL. of sample. This flushes the Nter of any
excess distilled water used for prior cleaning of the filter assembly.
3. Place the sample bottles directly under the filter outlet and fdl to the desired volume.
4. Preserve the sample as required.
5. Stop the pump, disconnect and disassemble the filter.
6. Discard the used filter and clean all surfaces of the filter holder with distilled water
and wipe dry with a clean lint-free tissue.
7.
Place a new fdter in the holder and reassemble.
SAMPLE PRESERVATION PROCEDURE
Samples are preserved by a variety of means to stabilize specific parameter so that the
samples can be shipped to a laboratoly for analysis. Preservatives are designed to retard
A-25
!4

iological effects, retard hydrolysis, reduce sorption effects, and reduce volatility of
constituents. Preservation methods are generally limited to pH control, chemid addition,
refrigeration, and protection from light. The following guidelines will be considered during
sample preservation.
Preservation of samples requires the use of a variety of strong acids and bases. Care should
be taken in their storage and use. Review of the MSDS sheet should be made before use and
the appropriate eye and skin protection should be in place prior to use. (Le., goggles and
gloves).
1. Preserve sample as soon after collection as possible.
2. For acidified samples, check the pH of the sample prior to capping. If needed, add
more acid until the proper pH is attained (Le., < 2).
3. Samples requiring cooling should be placed in an ice chest with wet ice immediately
after collection.
4. Record any preservatives used on &he sample label and the resulting pH, if applicable.
A-26

US ATHAMA-APPROVED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION
REQUIREMENTS, STORAGE METHODS, AND HOLDING TlMES FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES

Parameter
INORGANIC TESTS
Acidity
Alkalinity
limnon i a
Asbestos
Bicarbonate
Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (Boil)
and Carbonaceous 800
Bromide
Carbonate
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COO)
Chloride
Chlorine. Total Residual
Color
Cyanide, Total and
Pmenable to
Chlorinat ion
Dissolved Oxygen
Probe
Winkler
Fluoride
Hardness
Hydra2 ine
Iodide
Jodine
Kjeldahl and Organic
Nitrogen
Table B-I. Containers. Preservation. Storage. and Holding Timesa
Cant a 1 ner b Preservat ivecSd Maximum Holding Time
hater Soil Water Soil for all Matricese
--
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
G
t iottle
a nd Top
G
E lottle
dl nd Top
P
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
NIA
N/A
G
NIA
N/A
G
P NIA
P G
P G
P G
P G
Cool, 4%
Cool. 4OC
Cool, 4%
H2S04 to pH

Parameter
i
Metals
Chromium V I
Hercury
Others
Nitrate
Nitrate plus Nitrite
Nitrite
Oil and Grease
Orthophosphate
PH
Pheno 1 s
Phosphorous, Elemental
Phosphorous, Total
Silica. Dissolved or Total
Residue
Filterable
Settleable
Nonfilterable (TSS)
Total
Yo 1 a t i le
Specific Conductance
Sulfate
Sulfide
SUI f i te
8UrfdC tdntS
Temperature
Turbidity P
ORGANIC TESTSJ .
Acrolein and Acrylonitrile S
Table B-1. (cont'd.)
Con t a lner b preservative c.d Maximum Holding Time
Water Soil Water Soi 1 for al I Matrlcese
--
P
P
P
P
P
P
G
P
P
G
G
P.G
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
G
G
G
G
G
G
N/A
Cool. 4%
HN03 to pH .2
HN03 to pH

1
Benzidines
Parameter
1
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
1
Haloethers
Nitroaromati s and
5
lsophorone
Ni trosaminesl"
PCBS
1
Pesticides
1
Phenols
1
Phthalate Esters
Polynuclear Arpmatic
Hydrocarbons
Purgeable Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Purgeable Halocarbons
TCDO~
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Halogen
Table B-1. (Cont'd.)
Container b Preservat ivecSd Maximum Holding Time
Water Sol I Water Soi I for all flatrjcese
--
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
5
5
G
G
G
5
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
t
G
S
G
G
G
Cool, 4OP
0.008% Na2S203g
pH 2-7
Cool. 4%
Cool, 4%
0.008% Na2S2039
cool. 4oc
Store in Oark
Cool. 4OC
Store in Dark
0.008% Na2S203g
Cool. 4oc
Cool. 4OC
pH^ 5-gP
cool. 4OC
0.008% Na2S20j9
Cool. 4OC
Cool. 4%
0.008% Na 5 03g
Store in 6a$k
Cool. 4%
O.OOe% Na2S20jg
HC1 to pH
Cool. 4OC
0.008% Na2S20jg
Cool. 4OC
0.008% Na2S039
Cool, 4e
HC1 or H2S04
to pH < Z
Cool. 4OC
1 ml of 0.1 H
sodium sulfite
Cool, 4OC 7 days until extraction"
Cool. 4%
Cool. 4OC
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
Cool, 4OC 7 days until extraction
Store in Oark 40 days after extraction
Cool, 4OC 7 days until extraction
Store in Oark 40 days after extraction
Cool. 4OC
Cool, 4%
Cool, 4OC
Cool, 4OC
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
Cool, 4% 7 days until extraction
Store in Dark 40 days after extraction
Cool, 4% 14 daysq
Cool. 4% 14 days
Cool, 4%
Cool, 4oc 28 days
Cool, 4OC 7 days
Analytes not listed should be preserved at 4OC and held not longer than 7 days.
7 days until extraction
40 days after extraction
'Preservatlves and holdinq times are from Federal Reqlster. Vol. 49. No. 209, Friday, October 26. 1984.
Page 43260 and Characteriiation of Hazardous Haste Sites: A Methods Manual -- Volume 11. Sampling Methods,
Second Edition. EPA-60m -84-076. Container requirements are consistent with these references.
bP = Polyethylene
G - Amber Glass with Teflon-lined cap
8 = Glass Vlal with Teflon-lined septum cap

Table B-I. (concluded)
CSample preservation should be performed. imnediately upon sample collection. For COmPOSite samples. each
aliquot should be preserved at the time of collection. Uhen use Of an aUtCmatiC Sampler makes it
impossible to preserve each aliquot. samples may be preserved by maintaining at 4% untii campositing and
sample splitting is completed.
dUhen any sample is to be shipped by comnon carrier or sent through the U.S. Mall. it must comply with the
Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR Part 172). The person offering such
material for transportation is responsible for ensuring such compliance. For the preservation requirements
in this table, the Office of Hazardous Materials. Materials Transportation Bureau. Department of
Transportat ion. has determined that the Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apply '0 the following
materials: Hydrochloric acid (HCI) in water solutions at .concentrations of 0.04X by weight or less (pH
about 1.96 or greater); Nitric dCid (HNO ) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.15% by weight or less
(pH about 1.62 or greater); Sulfuric acii (H SO4) in water solutions at concentrations Of 0.35% by weight
or less (PH about 1.15 or greater); and So&um hydroxide (NaDH) in water solutions at concentrations of
0.08OZ by weight or less (pH about 12.3 or less).
eSamples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the maximum tfmes
that samples may be held before analysis and still be considered valid.
Some samples may not be stable for the maximum time period given in the table.
A laboratory is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if knowledge exists to show this fs
necessary to maintain sample integrity.
fTf samples cannot be filtered within 48 hours. add 1 ml of a 2.71% solution of mercuric chloride to
inhibit bacterial growth.
gshould only be used in the presence of residual 'chlorine.
hMaximum holding time is 24 hours when sulfide is present. Optionally, all samples may be tested with lead
acetate paper before pH adjustment in order to determine if sulfide iS present. If sulfide Is present, it
can be removed by addition of cadmium nitrate ponder until a negative Spot test 1s obtained. The sample IS
filtered and then NdOH is added to pH 12.
'For dissolved metals, filter Imnediately on slte before adding preservative.
'Giiidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC. LC. or GC/HS for specffic compounds.
kThe pH adjustment Is not required if acrolein will not be measured.
adjustment must be analyzed within three days of sampling.
'When the extractable analytes of concern fall within a single chemical category, the specified
Preservative and maximum holding times must be observed for optimum safeguard of sample integrity. When
the analytes of concern fall within two or more chemical categories. the sample may be preserved by cooling
to doc. reducing residual chlorine with 0.008% sodium thiosulfate. storing in the dark, and adjusting pH to
6-9: samples preserved in this manner may be held for 7 days before extraction and 40 days after
extraction. Exceptions to this optimal preservation and holding time procedure hre noted in footnotes g.
m, and n.
m
I f 1.2-diphenylhydrazine is likely to be present. adjust the pH of the sample to 4.0 c 0.2 to prevent
rearrangement to benzidine.
n
Extracts may be stored up to 7 days before analysis if storage is conducted under an fnert (oxidant-free)
atmosphere.
Samples for acrolein receiving no pH
'For the analysis of diphenylnitrosamine. add 0.008% Na2S203 and adjust pH to 7-10 with HaOll within 24
hours of sampling.
'The pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the samples are
extracted nithin 72 hours of collection. For the analysis of aldrin, add 0.008% NaZS20,.
'Sample receiving no pH adjustment must he analyzed nithin 7 days of sampllng.

REPORTING LIMITS FOR LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF JPG
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES (to be provided)

APPENDIX B
FIELD SAMPLING LOG BOOKS

JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND
FELD SAMPLING NOTEBOOK

Table of Contents

.
Table of Contents
j Page
--

Read and Understood By

Read and Understood BY I
Signed
Dale
__

Read arid Understood By

Read and Understood Ry

Read anu Understood By

Read apd Understood By

Read and Understood BY

.
- ~
Cont,nucd From Page---.
, . . . . I ,
, I
Arthur D. Little, Inc. Collecrorr gTjL13 C
Acorn Park bO\D-k\‘~~ Date
Cambndge. MA 02140
(6 17)864-5770 Time
///+7/qL
) 300
C
f
C
C
Rend and Understood R!

-. . l’/
Read and Understood By

3JECT -A
. ,
-1564-5770
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
Read and Underslood By
Continued From Page

I I I I I I I I I I I I . / I 1 ' 1
Collectors u/ 45
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
AcornPark vitro I r t r k l ~~t~ V/AQ
Cambridge, MA 02 $7 4
(617)864-5770 a-A-4 b - bd 'I' Time /O 55
/
Sample # CJF~;-GQ-G/~-MW~ &qcc
0
co
0
1 5 ~ 0
I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ' I
Read 2nd Understood By
I

Read and Underslood By
I

Read and Understood BY

JL IVOIeOOOK NO.
PROJECT Continued From Page
Read and Understood By
Signed Del8

JECT
otebook No.
L, Continued From Page-

APPENDIX C
ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The data in this appendix are arranged by sample matrix into a list of surface-water results,
sediment results, groundwater results, and quality-control sample results. Most of the headings
on the lists in Appendix C are self explanatory; although, many of the method codes and test-
name abbreviations require the use of the IRDMIS dictionary to identify the associated
parameters. The column in the lists identified as "Meas. Bool.", is short for measurement
boolean. It is used as an indicator that the measured quantity is not within a certified range, or
that the test used does not yield quantitative results. An entry of ND in this column indicates
that the analyte was not detected, and an entry of "LT" indicates that the analyte was less than
the Certified Reporting Limit (CRL). When the column entry is blank, it indicates that the
analytical result is within the certified range. It is possible to have a blank entry indicating a
positively identified chemical that is less than the CRL but greater than half of the criteria of
detection. These results are flagged with a P in the data base; however, this column does not
appear in the Appendix C listings. Data with special flags are discussed when the individual
results are presented in the text. The data tables included in the body of the report are
compilations of the positively identified chemicals detected for all samples.

SURFACE WATER
SAMPLE RESULTS

May 22, 1992
sice Type
. .
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
File m e:. 3 sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-mav-92
* Non-detecKed Compounds Included *
Method
MeaS
SiCe ID Code Test Name Sample Date Boo1
~ ~ .... _ .~...~_.. ~ ......._... ~ ~ .
SW-001-EN1 99
UNO5
SW-002-EN2 99
UNO5
SW-003-EN3 99
UNO5
SW-004-EN4 99
UNO 5
SW-005-EN5 99
UNO5
SW-006-EN6 99
UNO5
SW-007-EN7 99
UNO5
SW-008-EN8 99
SW-009-EN9 99
UNO5
UNO5
SW-010-EX1 99
99
99 ..
99
SB03
SB03
SD24
SD24
SO24
SD24
SO24
BRMCIL
AT2
BRMCIL
AT2
BRMC I L
ATZ
BRMCIL
ATZ
BRMCIL
AT2
BRMCIL
AT2
BRMCIL
ATZ
BRMCIL
ATZ
BRMCIL
AT2
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
TETR
HG
HC
AG
AC
AS
PB
SE
18 - Jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Value
4.87ei00
7.80e-01
4.87er00
7.80e-01
4.43er00
5.05e-01
4.87e+00
4.90e-01
4.13e+00
7.13e-01
4.87e+00
7.20e-01
4.87e+00
7.80e-01
4.87e+00
7.80e-01
4.87er00
7.80e-01
1.82ei00
4.43er00
5.09e-01
7,19e+00
2.60ei00
2.73et00
I .38e+00
3.16e-01
3.09er00
4.74er00
4 .lOe+00
Page 1
unit
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L

May 22. 1992
sice rype
. ~ ....
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Type: csw sampling ~ j t e Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
MeChod
Site ID Code Test
.~.~~.. .._~
SW-010-EX1 SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5.716
5516
SS16
SSI6
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
TYl2
UNO5
SW-OI1-EX2 99
99
99
99
5803
SD24
SO24
5024
SD24
SSI6
SS16
SSl6
SS16
SS16
AL
AL
6A
EA
HE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
cu
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
m
MN
NA
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
ATZ
Name sample Date
.._. ...........
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-;an-;99i
16- jan- 1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 ~ jan- 1992
16-jan-1992
16 - j an- 19 92
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16 -j an- 1992
16 ~ jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - j an- 1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - jan- 1992
2A46DT
HRMCIL
NG
TETR
17- jan- 1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
HC 17-jan-1992
AG 17-jan-1992
AS 17-jan-1992
PH 17-jan-1992
SE 17-jan-1992
AL 17-jan-1992
AL 17-ian-1992
BA 17-jan-1992
BA 17-jan-1992
BE 17-jan-1992
Meas.
6001,
..__.
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Value
4.75e+02
8,15e+01
3.81e+01
6.40et01
3.41e-01
3 .ZOe+04
3.60e+04
2.67e+00
2 .SOe+Ol
4.47e100
I. 12e+01
4.29ei00
4.88e+01
4.78e+02
1.35e+03
2.46e+03
9.30erO3
1.10e+04
4.00etoi
4.56e+01
1.60e+04
1,50e+04
8.76e+00
5.12e+01
1.14e+02
4.00e+00
1.94et01
5.00e+00
7.13e-01
1 .82e+o0
4.87e+00
5.09e-01
7.19er00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4 .74e+OO
4.10e+00
2.91et02
B.I5e+01
3.88erOl
4.00er01
3.41e-01
Page 2
Unit
Meas
....
UG L
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
Site Type
STRM
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Type: CSW Sampling Date ~ange: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . . . . . . ....
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
TY12
UNO5
SW-018-EX7 5803
SD24
SD24
5024
sn24
SW-020-EX9 99
99
99
99
99
SB03
TYl2
Test Name Sample D ate
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
cu
cu
FE
FE
K
X
MG
MG
MN
MN
NA
NA
NI
SB
TL
v
ZN
CYN
AT2
HC
AC
AS
PB
SE
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
NQ
TETR
HC
AG
AS
PB
SE
CYN
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17 -j an- 1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 1992
17- jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 19 92
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
23-jan-1992
23 - jan-1992
23-jan-1992
23-ian-1992
23-;an-1992
21-jan-1992
71-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
2,00e+04
2.10er04
2.67e+00
2.50ei01
4.69e+00
4.47e+00
7.29ei00
4.29e+00
3.47er01
1.88ei02
4.73er02
5.74e+02
4,10e+03
4.70e+03
3.04ei01
3.84e+01
3.15ei03
3.32e+03
8.76e+00
5,12e+01
1.10er03
4.00e+00
1.94ei01
5.00e+00
7.8Oe-01
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
I .82e+OO
4.43er00
5.09e-01
I. 87ei0
7.19e+00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74er00
4. lOerOO
5.00e+00
Page 3
U"iC
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
Site Type
...
STRM
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallacion: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File Type: CSW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-map92
Method
SiLe ID Code
. . ....
SW-020-EX9 UNO5
UW26
W26
UW26
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
UWZ 6
UWZ 6
SW-021-EX8 99
99
99
99
99
SBO3
SD24
SD24
5024
SD24
w12
UNO5
UW2 6
W26
UWZ 6
UW26
UW2 6
UW2 6
W2 6
UW26
UW2 6
SW-022-EX7 99
99
99
99
5803
SO24
5024
5024
Test Name
. . . . . . . -.
AT2
135TNB
13DNB
246TWT
24DNT
26DNT
)IMx
NB
RDX
TETRYL
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
CYN
AT2
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
2 4 DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
ZA46DT
NC
NQ
TETR
HG
AG
AS
PB
Meas
Sample Date Boo1
.__-..._... ....
21-jan-1992
2 1 -jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21- jan-1992
21-ian-1992
2 1 - j an- 19 92
21- jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21- jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21- jan-1992
2 1 - jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jam-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jaw1992
21-jan-1992
21- jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1 - jan-I992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
UniL
ValUe MeaS
._._. ...~
7.13e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1,16e+00
l.lle+Oo
8.69e-01
1.54e+00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
1.82e+00
4.87er00
5.09e-01
1.87ei01
7.19ei00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09er00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
5.00er00
l.80e-01
3.88e-01
2.7Oe-01
7.6le-01
1.16e+00
I. 11e.00
8.69e-Ul
1.54e*oo
6.17r-01
1.91e-01
1.82e+00
5.09e-01
1.87et01
7.19e+00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09er00
4.74er00
Page 4
UCL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

Mav 22. 1992 Page 5
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File Wpe: CSW sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method Meas.
Slte Type Size ID Code Te5t Name Sample Dace BOO1 . ValUe
............... .... .................... ..... ...
STRM SW-022-EX7 SD24 SE 21-Ian-1992 LT 4. IOe+00
TY12 CYN 2 1 - jan-1992 LT 5.00ei00
UW2 6
UW2 6
vW2 6
UW2 6
vW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
UW2 6
STRM SW-023-EX6 99
99
99
99
99
5803
135TNB
i 1 DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
RDX
TETRYL
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
NQ
TETR
2 1 - jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
1.11e+00
8.69e-01
1.54et00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
1.82ei00
4 .43e+00
5.09e-01
1. e7er01
7.19e+00
Unit
MeaS
....
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
HG 21-jan-1992 LT 5.66e-01 UGL
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
5024 AG 21-jan-1992 LT 3.16e-01
SO24 AS 21-jan-1992 LT 3.09e+00
SD24 PB 21-ian-1992 LT 4.74e+00
sn24 SE 21-jan-1992 LT 4.1De+00
TYl2 CYN 21-jan-1992 LT 5.00e+00
UNO5 AT2 2I-jan-i992 LT 7.13e-01
UW2 6
WZ 6
UWS 6
UW26
UW2 6
UW2 ~ ~~ 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW26
135TNB
1lDNB
246TNT
2 4 DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
STRM 2A46DT 21-jan-1992
BRMCIL 21-ian-1992
NG
21-jan-1992
NQ
21-jan-1992
TETR 21-jan-1992
SB03
SD24
HG
AG
21-jan-1992
21 - jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1 -i an- 1992
21-jan-1992
2 i - jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
I .eer-oi
2.70e-01
7.bie~ni
1. I6r+OU
l.lle+00
8.69e-01
1.54et00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
1.02e+00
4.87et00
5.09e-01
1.87e+01
7,19e+00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Type: Csw sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 Ca 22-may-92
Method Meas.
Site Wipe Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date BOO1 . Value
STRM SW-024-EX5 SO24 AS 21-jan-1992 LT 3.09e+00
SD24 PB 21-jan-1992 LT 4.74er00
SO24 SE 21- jan-1992 LT 4.10e+00
Page 6
TY12 CYN 21-jan-1992 7.56er00 UG L
UNO 5 AT2 2 1 - j an- 1992 LT 7.80e-01 UGL
W 2 6
UW2 6
W26
W26
UW2 6
W26
UWZ 6
W26
UW2 6
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21- jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1 - j an- 1992
2 1- jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16et00
l.lle+Oo
R.69e-01
~~~ ~~
1.54er00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
STRM SW-025-EX3 99
99
99
99
99
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
NQ
TETR
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-Ian-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.82e+00
4.87e+00
5.09e-01
1.87e+01
7,19e+00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
SB03 HG
22-jan-1992 LT 5.66e-01 UGL
SO24
SD24
SD24
SD24
AG
AS
PB
SE
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.16e-01
3.09eiOO
4.74e+00
4. lOeiOO
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
TY12 CYN 22-jan-1992 LT 5 . OOei 00 112L.
UNO5 AT2 22- jan-1992 LT 7,8O*-U 1 UCL
UW26
UW2 b
UW2 6
W2 6
W26
UW2 6
W26
UW2 6
W2 6
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
2 6DNT
rn
NB
RDX
TETRYL
STRM SW-12-EX17 99 2A46DT
99 BRMCIL
99 NG
99 NQ
22-jan-1992
22-Ian-1992
22 - jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-ian-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3 .Bt(e-Ol
2.70e-01
1.16er00
l.ller00
8.69e-01
1.54et00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
1.82ei00
4.87e+00
5.09e-01
1.87e+Oi
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL

May 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Wpe: CSW sampling ~ a Range: ~ e 01-jan-92
Method
Meas.
Site Type Slte ID Code Test Name sample Dace 0001. Value
........~ .~..-.. __.. _..__.... ....--...._ .__.. ...-.
STRM
STRM
SW-12-EX17 99 TETR
SW-13-EX16 99
99
SB03
SB03
SD24
SD2 4
SD24
SD2 4
SD2 4
SO24
SO2 4
SD24
SS16
HG
HG
AG
AG
AS
AS
PB
~~
PB
SE
SE
19- jan- 1992
19-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
22-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
19 - j an- 19 92
22-jan-1992
19 - j an- 19 92
22-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT 7.19er00
2.50e+00
LT 5.66e-01
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.16e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4,74e+00
4, lOeiOO
4.10e+00
LT 8.15e+01
Page 7
unit
Meas
-...
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SSt6
5.516
5516
SS16
SS16
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19 - j an- 19 92
19-jan-1992
19 - jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
5.30e+01
3.41e-01
7.40e+04
2.67et00
2.50e+01
7.59e+00
9.19e+00
2.32e102
4.90e+03
l.lOei04
5.44er01
1.50ei04
a .76e+00
5.12eiOl
l.lOe+04
4.00et00
1.94r+OI
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UCI.
TY12 CYN 20-jan-1992 LT S.Ooe+OO UGI.
UNO5 AT2 19-jan-1992
6.10e-01 UGL
UW26
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
&I2 6
UW2 6
UW26
UW2 6
~ 135TNB
~~~~
13DNB
246TNT
2 4 DNT
26DNT
NB
RDX
TETRYL
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19 - j an- 1992
19-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16er00
l.llei00
1.54et00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
2A46DT
BRMCIL
LT 1.82e+00
LT 4.43e+00
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1912
Site Type
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallacion: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFJ
File Wpe: CSW Sampling Dace Range: 01-Jan-92 LO 22-map92
Method
site ID Code
._..
SB03
5024
SD24
SD24
SD24
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
5.516
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
5.516
TYl2
UNO5
SW-14-EX15 99
99
99
99
MeaS.
Test Name Sample Dace BOOl.
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
aG
AS
PB
SE
AL
AL
BA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
cu
cu
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MC
MN
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
TL
V
ZN
ZN
CYN
ATZ
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
NQ
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an-1 9 92 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20- Jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an-1 992
20-jan-1992 LT
20- j an-1992
2 0 - j an-1 9 92
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992 ND
20-jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an- 19 92 LT
20- jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an-1 9 92 LT
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an-1 9 92 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
Value
.....
5.09e-01
1.87e+Ol
7.19e+00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09ei00
4.74e+00
4,10e+00
2.34e+02
8.15e+01
6.60ei01
7.00e+01
3.41e-01
2.40e104
3.00et04
2.67e+00
2.50e+01
7.30e+00
4.47er00
5.53ei00
1.5 le+O 1
2.18e+OZ
5.54ei02
8.56e+OZ
9.06e+02
5.90e+03
6.70et03
4.23e+01
8.78ei01
1.50e+04
8.76e+00
S.lZe+Ol
1.10er03
1.10et04
4.00e+00
2.2ae+o1
1.94e+01
5.00e+00
7.13e-01
1.82t?+00
4.43er00
5.09e-01
1,87e+01
Page 8
Unit
Mea5
.___
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
uc L
UGL
UGL.
VC L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L

May 22, 1992
sice m e
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Sefferson Pmvlng Ground IJF)
~lle vpe: csw sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 co 22-may-92
Method
Site I D Code
_~..... ....
SW-14-EX15 99
SB03
SB03
5024
SD24
SD24
SD24
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5.516
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
TYl2
UNO5
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
Mea3
Test Name sample Date Boo1
...._...... __.. . value
Unit
MeaS
_.___ ___.
TETR
HG
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
cu
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
hN
m
NA
NI
SB
TL
v
ZN
CYN
ATZ
135WB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
20-jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-ian-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992 LT
7n-ian-1992 ..
20-;&1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992 NO
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20- jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
2 0 - j an- 19 92 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-ian-1992 LT
7.19e+00
1.44et00
1.50e+02
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
8.15e+Ol
3.67ei01
5.00erOl
3.41e-01
3.10er04
3.50e+04
2.67ei00
2.50e+01
4.47e+00
1.l8erOl
4.29e+00
2.64er01
1.24erO2
7.40e+02
7.69e+02
7.90er03
1.30e+04
2.9 le+ 01
3.76er01
1.50e+04
8.76e+00
5.12e+01
1.10e+04
4.00e+00
1.94e+01
5.00e+00
7.13e-01
5.00e-01
3.50e-01
l.oOer00
1.50e+00
1.40e+OO
1.10e+00
2.00er00
8.00e-01
2.50e-01
Page 9
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1992
Site m e
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson P roving Ground
file Type: CSW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code
..._
SW-16-EX13 SO24
SO24
SD24
SD24
SD2 4
SO24
SO24
SO24
5516
5516
SSl6
SS16
SS16
5516
SSl6
SSl6
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
TY12
UNO5
SW-17-EX12 99
99
99
99
99
SB03
S803
SO24
SO24
SD24
SO24
TYl2
UNO5
rest Name Sample Date
.... ..
AG
AG
AS
AS
PB
PB
SE
SE
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
AT2
2A46DT
BMCIL
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
CYN
AT2
2 0 - j an- 1992
22-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-I992
io -;an-1995
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21- jan-1992
2 1- j an- 19 92
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-I992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
IJF)
to 22-may-92
Meas.
Boo1 . Value
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Nc
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
rr
LT
3.16e-01
3.16e-01
3.09ei00
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.74e+00
4,10e+00
4.10ei00
1.46er02
3.19er01
3.4le-01
3.IOei04
2.61e+00
2.50e+01
5.4 Oe+OO
5.47er00
2.21e+02
6.39ei02
1,60e+04
1. e2er01
1.50e+04
8.76ei00
5.12e+01
1.14e+02
4.00ei00
1.94ei01
5.00et00
7,lle-01
1.82e+00
4.43e+00
5.09e-01
1.87e+01
7.19e+00
1.62et00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
1.09ero0
4.74er00
4. IOetOO
s . oov~oo
7.13e-01
Page 11
Unit
MeaS
_...
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UOI.
lII:l,
UGI.

May 22. 1992 Paae - 12
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Type: CSW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site Tfpe Site ID Code
....... ....
STRN SW-17-EX12 UW26
UW2 6
W26
W26
UWZ 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
UWZ 6
UW2 6
STRM SW-18-EXlI 99
99
99
99
99
smo3
SD24
SD24
SO24
SD24
TYl2
W05
UW2 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
UW26
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW26
UW2 6
STRM SW-19-EX10 99
99
99
99
99
5803
SO24
5024
SO24
SD24
Meas. unit
Test Name Sample Date mod. value MeaS
.......__ ......._... ..._. _..__
135TNB
13DNB
246WT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
2A46DT
BRMCIL
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
CYN
AT2
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
2R46DT
mmciL
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- j an-1992
21 - jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21- jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
1.11e+00
8.6%-01
1.54e+00
6.17e-01
1.9le-01
1.82er00
4 .43e+00
5.09e-01
1.87e+OI
7.19er00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
5.00ei00
7.13e-01
____
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
uc L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
2 1- jan-1992 LT 3.88e-01 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 2.70e-01 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 7.67e-01 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 1.16ec00 UGL
2 1- jan-1992 LT l.lle+OO UGL
2 1- jan-1992 LT 8.69e-01 UGL
21-ian-1992 LT 1.54e+00 UGL
21-Tan-1992 LT 6.17e-01 UGL
2 1- jan-1992 LT 1.91e-01 UGL
21-ian-1992 LT 1.02e+00 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 4.43ei00 UGL
2 1- jan-1992 LT 5.09e-01 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 1.87e+01 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 7.19ei00 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 5.66e-01 UGL
21-jan-1992 LT 3,ioe-ut UGL
2 1 - jan- 1992 LT 3. 09e4 u0 UGI.
21-jan-1992 LT 4.74e.OU UCl.
21-jan-1992 LT 4.10a+00 UCL

May 22, 1992 Page 13
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (Jf)
File WPe: CSW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method Meas.
site Type site ID Code Test Name sample Date 6001. Value
STRM SW-19-EX10 TYl2 CYN 2 1 - j an-1 992 LT 5.00e+00
UNO5 AT2 2 1- j an- 19 92 LT 7.13e-01
UW2 6 135TNB 21-Jan-1992 LT 3.88e-01
UW2 6 13 DNE 21-ian-1992 LT 2.70e-01
UW2 6 246mT 21-jan-1992 LT 7.67e-01
UW2 6 24UNT 2 1 - j an- 1992 LT 1.16et00
UW2 6 26DNT 21-jan-1992 LT l.ller00
UWZ 6 HMX 21-ian-1992 LT 8.69e-01
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
STRM SW-22-EX11 99
UNO5
STRM SW-26-EX18 99
99
99
99
99
SB03
SO24
SO24
SD24
5024
TY12
UNO5
NB ii-jan-issz
RDX 21-jan-1992
TETRYL 21-jan-1992
BRMCIL 23-jan-1992
AT2 23-jan-1992
2A46DT 22-jan-1992
BRMCIL 22-jan-1992
NG 22-jan-1992
NQ 22-jan-1992
TETR 22 - jan-1992
HG 22-jan-1992
AG 22-jan-1992
AS 22-jan-1992
PB 22-ian-1992
SE 22-jan-1992
CYN 22-jan-1992
AT2 22-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.54er00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
4.87.2+00
7.80e-01
1.82e+00
4.87e+OO
5.09e-01
1.87e+01
7.19ei00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
5.00ei00
7.80e-01
UW2 6 135TNB 22-Jan-1992 LT 3.88e-01
UW2 6 13 DNB 22- jan-1992 LT 2.70e-01
UW2 6 246TNT 22-jan-1992 LT 7.67e-01
UW2 6 24UNT 22-jan-1992 LT 1.16er00
UW26 26DNT 22-jan-1992 LT 1.lle.00
UW2 6 HMX 22-jan-1992 LT 8.69e-01
UW2 6 NB 22-ian-1992 LT 1.54e+00
UW2 6 RDX 22-;an-1992 LT 6.17e-01
UW2 6 TETRYL 22-jan-1992 LT 1.91a-01
Report completed normally.
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL

SEDIMENT
SAMPLE RESULTS

May 22, 1992
site m e
. . . . . . . . .
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRM
STRH
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File m e : Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
* Non-detected Compounds Included *
Method
Site ID Code
. . . . . . . ...
SE-001-EN1 99
99
LJ04
SE-002-EN2 99
99
LJ04
SE-003-EN3 99
99
LJ04
SE-004-EN4 99
99
LJO4
SE-005-EN5 99
99
LJ04
SE-006-EN6 99
99
LJ04
SE-007-EN7 99
99
LJ04
SE-008-EN8 99
99
LJ04
SE-009-EN9 99
99
LJ04
Meas.
Test Name Sample Date BOOl.
_.__..... ....._..___
Value
BRMCIL 18-jan-1992
LI 18-jan-1992
PCP 18-jan-1992
BRMCIL 18-jan-1992
LI 18-jan-1992
PCP 18-jan-1992
BRMCIL 18-jan-1992
LI 18-jan-1992
PC P 18-jan-1992
BRMCIL 18-jan-1992
LI 18-jan-1992
PCP 18-jan-1992
BRMCIL 19 - j an- 1992
LI 19-jan-1992
PCP 19-jan-1992
BRMCIL 19-jan-1992
LI 19 - j an- 19 92
PCP 19-jan-1992
BRMCIL 19-jan-1992
LI 19-;an-1992
PCP 19-jan-1992
BRMCIL 16-jan-1992
LI 16-jan-1992
PCP 16-jan-1992
BRMCIL 19-jan-1992
LI 19-jan-1992
PCP 19-jan-1992
SE-010-EX1 99 2A46DT 16-ian-1992 LT 4.88e-01 UGG
99 AG 16-jan-1992 1.46e+00 UGG
99 BRMCIL 16-jan-1992 LT 6.25e-02 UCG
99 LI 16-jan-1992 LT 1.00e+02 UCG
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
6.2%-02
1.00e+02
1.36e+00
6.25e-02
1.00et02
1.36e+00
6.25e-02
1.00et02
1.36e+00
6.25e-02
1 .ooe+o2
1.36er 00
6.25e-02
1 .ooe+02
1.36e+00
6.25e-02
1.0oei02
1.3 6e+00
6.25e-02
1.00e+02
1.36e+00
6.25e-02
1.00ei02
1.36ec00
6.25e-02
1.0oer02
1.36e+00
Page 1
Unit
MeaS
....
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG

Mav 22. 1992 Page 2
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File W e : CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Meas.
Unit
Site Type Site ID Code Test Name sample Date 0001. Value Meas
......... ....... .... _......._ ...-...___- _____ ...__ ____
STRM SE-010-EX1 99 NG 16-jan-1992
99 NQ 16-Jan-1992
99 TETR 16-Jan-1992
JBOJ HG 16-jan-1992
5013 AS 16-Jan-1992
JS15 AL 16-jan-1992
5515 BA 16-jan-1992
JS15 BE 16-Jan-1992
JS15 CA 16-,an-1992
JS15 CD 16-jan-1992
JS15 co 16-jan-1992
JS15 CR 16-ian-1992
JS15 cu 16-ian-1992
JS15 FE 16-jan-1992
JSl5 K 16-jan-1992
JS15 MG 16-jan-1992
JS15 m 16-jan-1992
JS15 NA 16-jan-1992
JS15 NI 16-jan-1992
JS15 SB 16- jan-1992
JSl5 TL 16-jan-1992
JS15 V 16-ian-1992
JS15 ZN 16-jan-1992
LT 5.01e-01
LT 4.34e-01
LT 3.26e-01
GT 5.00e-01
4. lOetOO
2.60e+03
3.90e+01
1.80e-01
9,00e+03
LT 4.24e-01
LT 1.42et00
7.65e+00
LT 1.95er00
1.00e+04
1.61e+02
3.70e+03
4.00e+02
ND 4,lOetOl
LT 2.46et00
LT 3.42ei00
LT 1,66e+01
1.70e+01
2.88et01
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
~~~
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
KY07 CYN 16-jan-1992 LT 5.00er00 UGG
LJ04 PCP 16-jan-1992 LT 1.36e+00 UGG
STRM SE-Oll-EXl JBO3 HG 17-jan-1992 LT 2.59e-02 UGG
STRM SE-011-EX2 99 2A46DT 17-ian-1992 LT 4.88e-01 UGG
99 AG 17-jan-1992 LT 8.58e-02 UGG
99 BRMCIL 17-jan-1992 LT 6.25e-02 UGG
99 .. 1.1 _. 17-ian-1992 LT 1.00e+02 UGG
~~~~ ~~~~
99 NG i7-jan-1992 LT 5.01e-01 UGG
99 NQ 17-jan-1992 LT 4.34e-01 UGG
99 TETR 17-jan-1992 LT 3.26e-01 UGG
JD13 AS 17-jai-1992 3.60e+00 UGG
JS15 AL 17-jan-1992 2.40e+04 UGG
JS15 BA 17-jan-1992 1.40e+02 UGG
.I< .__.
1 5 RF ._ 17-ian-1992 LT ~~
- 1.8Oe-02 UGG
~~~~~~~~
JS15 CA 17-jan-1992 1.90e+03 UGG
JS15 CD 17-jan-1992 LT 4.24e-01 UGG
JS15 co 17-jan-1992 LT 1.40er01 UGG

May 22. 1992
Site m e
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File ‘Type: CSE sarnpllng Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Page 3
Method
Meas. unit
SlCe ID Code Test Name sample i ate BOOl. Value Meas
......~ .._. . . _.
SE-011-EX2 JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
KY07
LJ04
99
99
99
J803
5013
JS15
JSlS
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
KT04
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
m
NA
NI
SB
TL
v
ZN
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AG
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
HC
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
CU
FE
K
MG
m
NA
NI
SB
TL
v
ZN
NO2
17-Jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 19 92
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
21 - jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1-ian-1992
21-?an-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-;an-1992
2 1 -j an- 19 92
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
2.10e+03
7.90e+02
1.14ei02
LT 2.46e+00
LT 3.40e+01
LT 1.70e+02
3.40e+Ol
LT 8.00ei01
LT 5.00er00
LT 1.36er00
LT 4.88e-01
LT 8.58e-02
LT 6.25e-02
LT 1.00et02
LT 5 .Ole-01
LT 4.34e-01
LT 3.26e-01
LT 2.59e-02
5.50e+00
1.92e-01
1.30ei04
LT
LT
4.24e-01
1.42e+00
1.19e.01
7.21e+00
1.40e+04
8.50et02
5.10e+03
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan- 1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
4.40e+O2
1.37et02
2.46er00
3.42e+00
I .70e+02
2.51e+01
8.00er01
21-jan-1992 LT 3,16e+00
____
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UCG
UCG
UCG

May 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
File W e : CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method Meas.
Site rype site ID Code Test Name sample Date BOOl. Value
STFLM SE-020-EX9 KT04 NO3 21-jan-1992 LT 3,36e+00
STRM SE-021-EX8 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
KY07 CYN 21-jan-1992 LT 5.00e+00
LJ04 PCP 21 - jan-1992 LT 1.36e+00
5803
JDl3
2A46DT
AC
BRMCIL
LI
NC
NQ
TETR
HG
AS
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan-1992
21 - jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jaw1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
4.88e-01
8.58e-02
6.25e-02
1.00e+02
5 . Ole-Ol
4.34e-01
3.26e-01
2.59e-02
4.60er00
JS15 AL 21-jan-1992 2.10et04
JS15 BA 2 1- jan-1992 6.90er01
JS15 BE 21-jan-1992 LT 7.80e-02
JSl5 CA 21-jan-1992 7.30e+03
JS15 CD 21-jan-1992 LT 4.24e-01
JS15 co 21-jan-1992 LT 1.40e+Ol
JS15 CR 21-jan-1992 1.62et01
JS15 cu 21-jan-1992 LT 1.95e+00
JSlS FE 21-jan-1992 2.40e+04
JS15 K 21-jan-1992 1.00et03
JSl5 MC 21-jan-1992 3.70e+03
JS15 MN 21-jan-1992 5,lOe+O2
JS15 NA 21- jan-1992 1.61e+02
JS15 NI 21-jan-I992 LT 2.46e+00
JS15 SB 21-jan-1992 LT 3 .40e+01
JS15 TL 21-jan-1992 LT 1.70e+02
JS15 V 21-jan-1992 3.28e+01
JS15 ZN 21-jan-1992 7.00e+01
KT04 NO2 21-jan-1992 LT 3.16e+OO
XT04 NO3 21-jan-1992 9.30e+00
KY01 CYN 21-jan-1992 LT 5.00ei00
LJ04 PCP 21-jan-1992 LT 1.36et00
STRM SE-022-EX7 99 2A4 6DT 2 1 - j an- I992 LT 4 .8nr-oi
99 AC 21-jan-1992 LT 8.58e-02
99 BRMCIL 21-jan-1992 LT 6.25e-02
99 LI 21-jan-1992 LT I .00e+02
99 NC 21-jan-1992 LT 5.01e-01
Page 4
Unit
Meas
.__-
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCC
UGC
ucc
UGC
UCC
UGG
UGG
UGC
UCG
UCC
UCG
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UCG
UGG
UGG
UCG
~~~
UGG
UCC
UCG
UGG
UGC
UCG
UGC
UGG
UCG
UGC:
UGC
UCC

May 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File W e : CSE Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Page 5
Method
Meas.
Unit
Site m e site ID Code Test Name sample Date BOOl. Value Meas
~.....~~. ....... _... ...._.... ._____...__ -..__
STRM SE-022-EX7 99
99
JB03
JDl3
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
KT04
KT04
KYC7
LJ04
NQ 21-jan-1992
TETR 21-Jan-1992
HG 2 1 - jan-1992
AS 21-jan-1992
AL 21-jan-1992
BA 21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
BE 21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
CA 21-jan-1992
CD 2 I - jan- 1992
co 21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
CR 21-jan-1992
2i-;an-1992
CU 21-jan-1992
FE 21-jan-1992
K 21-jan-1992
MG 21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
m 21-jan-1992
21-;an-1992
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- j an-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
NO2
NO3
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
CYN 21-jan-1992
PCP 2i-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
4.34e-01
3.26e-01
2.59e-02
5.80e+00
____
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
4.50et03 UGG
2.60er01 ucc
7.80e-01 UGG
1.40e+03 UGC
4.20e+00 UGG
i.40e+01 UGC
3.90e+01 UGG
2.00e+01 UGG
5.60e+04 UGG
2.1se+02 UGG
6.lOer02 UGG
3.70er02 UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
~~~
1.30ei02
8.0oe+01
3.16e+00
3.36et00
S.OOe+OO
1.36e+OO
STRM SE-023-EX6 99 2A46DT 21-jan-1992 LT 4.88e-01
99 AG 21-jan-1992 LT 8.58e-02
99 ERMCIL 21-jan-1992 LT 6.25e-02
99 LI 21-jan-i992 LT 1.0oe+02
99 NG 21-jan-1992 LT 5.cie-01
99 NQ 21-jan-1992 LT 4.34e-01
99 TETR 21-jan-1992 LT 3.26e-01
5803 HC 21-jam-1992 LT 2 .iYe-OZ
5013 AS 21 -jan-l992 3.jueruu
JS15 AL 21-ian-1992 1.10e+03
JS15 EA 21-jan-1992
JS15 BE 21-jan-1992
JS15 CA 21-jan-1992
7.32e+00
1.9Oe-01
2.70er03
uu;
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UGC
UGG
UGG

May 22. 1992 Page 6
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File m e : CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site Type Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date
_..._.... ....... ._.. __....... __......___
STRM SE-023-EX6 5515
JS15
JS15
JS15
5515
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
KTO 4
KT04
KY07
LJ04
STRM SE-024-EX5 59
99
95
99
99
99
99
5803
JD13
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSlS
5.915
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
CD
co
CR
CU
FE
K
MC
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
NO2
NO3
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AG
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
HC
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MC
MN
NA
NI
SB
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-;an-1992
21-;an-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1 - i an - 1952
21-jan-1992
LT 4.24e-01 UGG
LT 1.42e+00 UGG
1.17e+01 UGG
LT 1.95e+00 UGG
1.00e+04 UGC
1.07et02 UCC
9.90r+02 UCC
l.IOr+O2 UCG
l.i8e+O2 UGG
21-Jan-1992 LT 2.46ei00 UGG
21-Jan-1992 LT 3.42et00 UCG
21-jan-1992 LT 1.66e+01 ucc
21-ian-1992 1.86e+01 UGG
21-jan-1992 LT 7.96ei00 UGG
2 1- j an- 1942
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1 - j an- 19 92
2 1 - j an-I9 92
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 I - jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
2 I - jan- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
2 i-?an- 1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan-1992
21- jan-1992
LT 3.16e+00 UGG
LT 3.36e+00 UGG
LT 5.00e+00 UGG
LT 1.36e+00 UGG
LT 4.88e-01 UGG
LT 8.58e-02 UGC
LT 6.25e-02 UGG
LT 1.00e+02 UGG
LT 5.01e-01 UCG
LT 4.34e-01 UGG
LT 3.26e-01 UGC
LT 2.59e-02 UGG
3.30e.01 UGG
1.10e+04 UGG
1.30ei02 UGG
5.55e-01 UCG
8.80e.03 UCC
LT 4.24e-01 ucc
LT 1.42eb00 UCI;
l.BBe*Ol UCC
2.00e+03 UGG
9.94er01 UGG
LT 2.46et00 UGG
LT 3.42ei00 UGG

May 22. 1992
Site lype
.~ .......
STRM
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installaclan: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
~lle me: CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Sire ID Code
. -. . ....
SE-024-EX5 JSlS
JSl5
JSlS
KT04
KT04
KY07
LJ04
SE-025-EX3 99
99
99
99
99
551s
JSlS
JSlS
JS15
JSIS
JSIS
JSIS
JS15
JS15
JSIS
JS15
JS15
JSlS
JS15
JS15
JSIS
JSlS
JSl5
KT04
KT04
KY07
LJ04
jE-027-EX4 99
Test Name
TL
v
ZN
NG2
NO3
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AG
BPMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
CG
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
m
NA
NI
58
TL
v
ZN
NO2
NO3
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
Page 7
Meas.
Unit
sample Date Bool. Value Meas
...._...... .__.. ...._ .._.
2 1- jan-1992 LT
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992 LT
21-jan-1992 LT
2 1-jan- 1992 LT
21-jan-1992 LT
22-ian-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
2 2 - j an- 19 92
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
22 - jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992 LT
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
LT
22-jan-1992 LT
22-jan-1992 LT
22-jan-1992 LT
1.70e+02 UGG
4,97e+01 UGG
6.6Oe+01 UGG
3,16e+OO UGG
3.36e+00 UGG
5.00er00 UGG
1.36e+00 UGG
4.88e-01 UGG
8.S8e-02 UGG
6.25e-02 UGG
1.00e+02 UGG
5.01e-01 UGG
4.34e-01 UGG
3.26e-01 UGG
3.47e-01 UGG
8.80eiOD UGG
1.40ei04
l.lOeiO2
4.75e-01
UGG
UGG
UGG
5.00ei04
4.24e-01
UGG
UGG
1.40ei01 UGG
3.86e+01 UGG
1.40et01
2.80et04
UGG
UGC
1.10ei03 UGG
2.00ei04
9.00e+02
5.20et01
UGG
UGG
UGG
2.46erOO
3 ~. 47e+00
1.70e+O2
UGG
UCG
~~
UGG
4.96e+01 UGC
8.00ei01 uci:
3.lbrtOO utic
s.8ur+Uu U X
5.00e+00 UGG
1.36ei00 UGG
4.88e-01 UGG

Xay 22. 1992
STRY
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File Type: CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . . ....
SE-027-EX4 99
99
99
99
99
99
5803
5013
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
3S15
JS15
5515
KT04
KT04
KY07
LJ04
SE-12-EX17 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
5803
3D13
JS15
Meas.
Test Name sample Date Bool. value
...__..__ .___.._._._
AG 22-jan-1992
BRMCJL 22-jan-1992
LI 22-jan-1992
NG 22-jan-1992
NQ 22 - jan-1992
TETR 22-jan-1992
HG 22-jan-1992
AS 22-jan-1992
NO2 22 - jan-1992
NO3 22-Jan-1992
CYN 22-jan-1992
PCP 22-jan-1992
2A46DT 19-jan-1992
AC 19-jan-1992
BRMCIL 19-jan-1992
LI 19-ian-1992
NG ig-jan-1992
NQ 19-jan-1992
TETR 19-jan-1992
HG 19-Jan-1992
AS 19- jan-1992
AL 19- jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
8.58e-02
6.25e-02
1.00e+02
5.01~-01
4.34e-oi
3.26e-01
2.59e-02
4.40e+00
1.60er04
1.10e+02
3.28e-01
5 .ZOe+04
4.24e-01
1.40er01
1.65e+01
6.26e+00
1.50et04
1.20ei03
2.20e+04
1.30e+03
1.10e+03
2.4 6e+00
3.40e+01
4 .88e-01
8.58a-02
6.25e-02
1.00e*02
5.01e-01
4 .34e-Ol
3.26e-01
2.59e-02
7.10e+00
1.30e+04
Page 8
Unit
Mea5
_._.
UGG
UGG
UCC
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGC
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UCG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UCC
UGG
UGG
UCG

May 22. 1992
Site m e
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installacion: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFJ
File m e : CSE sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code Test Name
. -. .._.
Sample Date
SE-12-EX17 JS15
5515
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
5515
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
KY07
LJ04
SE-13-EX16 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
JB03
JD11
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
m
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AG
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
19- jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-ian-1992
Meas.
mol. value
__..-
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
I. 80e+02
7.80e-01
2.40e+04
4.20erOO
1.40e+01
7.20er01
2.00e+01
6.40e+04
9.00e+02
1.50er03
3.70er03
1.00er03
2.50e+01
3,40e+01
1.70e+02
9.7Oe+01
8.00e+01
19-Jan-1992 LT 5.00e+00
19-Jan-1992 LT 1.16e+00
20-Jan-1992 LT 4.88e-01
20-jan-1992 LT 8.58e-02
20-jan-1992 LT 6.25e-02
20-Jan-1992 LT 1.00e+02
20-Jan-1992 LT 5.01e-01
20-Jan-1992 LT 4.14e-01
20-jan-1992 LT 3.26e-01
20-Jan-1992 LT 2.59e-02
20-jan-1992 6.20ei00
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
2.90e+03
3.70e+01
2.9Oe-01
7.20et02
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jao-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
LT
LT
LT
4 .24e-Ol
1.42e+00
5.67e+00
I .95e+00
1.60e+04
2.15et02
I. lhO2 7. OOetOZ
1.29e+02
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
LT
LT
2.46e.00
3.42et00
Paoe 9
Unit
MeaS
..__
UGG
UGG
UGG
ucc
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UGC
UGC
UGG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG

May 22, 1992
Site Type
..-~ .....
STRM
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Provlng Ground (JFI
File Type: CSE Sampling ate Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
. .._.
SE-13-EX16 JS15
5515
JS15
KY07
LJ04
SE-14-EX15 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
JB03
JD13
JS15
5515
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
KY07
LJ04
SE-15-EX14 99
99
99
99
99
99
Test Name
TL
V
ZN
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AG
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
sa
TL
V
ZN
CYN
PCP
ZA46DT
AG
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
Meas.
Sample Date Bool.
......_.... .._..
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-ian-1992 LT
20-ian-1992 LT
20-j an-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20- j an-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992 LT
50 -jan- ;992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-ian-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-jan-1992 LT
20-ian-1992 LT
Value
.....
1.70er02
1.65e10 1
2.53er01
5.00e+00
1.36e+00
4.8Be-01
8.58e-02
6.25e-02
1.00ei02
5.01e-01
4.34e-01
3.26e-01
2.5%-02
4.60ei00
4.20et03
1.97e+01
3.69e-01
1.50et04
4.24e-01
1.42e+00
1.70er01
3.77e+00
1,90e+04
6.10e+OZ
6.60er03
2.90erO2
1.34e-02
2.46e-00
3.42e*00
I .70e+02
3.92e+01
2.50e+01
5.00e+00
1.36erOO
4.88e-01
8.5Be-02
6.25e-02
1.00e+02
5.01e-01
4.34e-01
Page 10
Unit
Meas
__..
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UGC
UCC
UGC
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UCG
UCG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG

May 22, 1992
Sire Type
~.~ ......
STRM
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFi
File Type: CSE Sampling ~ a ~ange: ~ e 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JSl5
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
KY07
LJ04
iE-16-EX13 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
5803
JD13
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
Tesc N ~ W Sample Date
TETR
HG
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
CU
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AC
BRNCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
2 0 - j an- 1992
20- jan- 1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an-1 992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
2o-jan-is92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
BOOl.
...._
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
va1LIe
3.26e-01
2.59e-02
6.40et00
3.40er03
1,94e+Ol
2.74e-01
4.80er04
4.24e-01
1.42e+00
1.76e+01
i. 95e+oC
1.50e+04
3.18et02
7.20ei03
3.10e+02
7.50et02
2.46e+00
3.42e+00
1.70e+02
2.61e+Oi
i.7ae+oi
5.00ei00
I .36e+00
4.8ar-oi
8.58e-02
6.25-02
l.OOe+02
5.01e-01
4 .34e-01
3.26e-01
2.59e-02
3.40e+01
4.20e+00
1,40e+01
6.40et01
2.00e+oi
Page 11
unit
Mea5
....
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UCG
UGC:
UGG
ucc
UGC
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG

May 22, 1992
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallacian: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
file Vpe: CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Meas,
Site ID Code Test Name sample Date Bool. Value
_...~.. ~... ....... ~. __._....___ ..._. _..._
KY07
LJ04
SE-17-EX12 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
JB03
JD13
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JSlS
JSlS
JS15
JSlS
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JSlS
JS15
KT04
KTO 4
KY07
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
v
ZN
CYN
PCP
2A46DT
AG
BRMCIL
tI
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AS
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
cu
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
v
ZN
NO2
NO3
CYN
20-Jan-1992
20- j an-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1942
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-lS92
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-?an-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
~~ ~
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
GT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
5.00e+04
1.40er03
1.8Oe+03
i.ioe+03
1.20e+03
2.50e+01
3.40er01
1.70e+O2
1.40eiO2
8.00er01
5.00er00
1.36erO0
4. Bee-01
8.58e-02
6.25e-02
1.00e+02
5.01e-01
4.34e-01
9.70er03
6.20rr01
7 .BOe-OL
9. Boer03
4 .20e+00
1.4 OeiO I
3.90er01
2, ooe+01
6,10e+04
8.70er02
3.80er03
1.20e+03
1,10e+03
2.50er01
3.40er01
1.7Oer02
1.10e+02
B.OOer01
3.16er00
3.36er00
5.00er00
rage 12
Unit
MeaS
~...
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGC
UCG
UGC
UGG
UGC
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG

May 22, 1992
Site Type Site ID
................
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Type: CSE sampling ace ~ ange: 01-jan-92 KO 22-may-92
Page 13
Method Meas.
Unit
Code TesK Name Sample DaKe Boo1 . value MeaS
.~.. .................... ..... .____ ....
_ .......
STRM SE-17-EX12 LJ04 PCP 2 1- jan-1992 LT
1.36er00
STRM SE-18-EX11 99 2A4 6DT 21-Ian-1992 LT 1.44e-01
_L __I I..I_ _ -.~ ....... ~~
99 AG 21- jan-1992 LT 8.58e-02
99 BRMCIL 21- Jan-1992 LT 6.25e-02
99 LI 21-Jan-1992 LT 1 1 .ooe+02 .ooe+02
oa NT- 21-izn-1992 71-izn-1992 LT 5.Ole-01
~~
I, -- *--- ----
99 NQ 21-jan-1992 LT 4.34e-01
99 TETR 21-jan-1992 LT 3.26e-01
STRM SE-19-EX10 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
5803 HG 21-jan-1992 LT 2.5%-02
JD13 AS 21-jan-1992 5.50ei00
JS15 AL 21-jan-1992
JS15 BR
JSl5 BE
JS15 CR
JS15 CD
JS15 CO
JS15 CR
JS15 cu
JS15 FE
JS15 K
JS15 MG
JS15 m
JSl5 NA
JS15 NI
JS15 SB
JSl5 TL
5.515 V
JSl5 ZN
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-?an-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.10ei04
8.30ei01
5.57e-01
5.80ei03
4.24e-01
1.40et01
2.66e+01
1.21eio1
4.10et04
1.30ei03
3.80ei03
9.70ei02
1.62ei02
2.46er00
3.42ei00
1.10~+02
6.06er01
I .5ar+o2
KTO 4 NO2 21-jan-1992 LT 3.16er00
KT04 NO3 21-jan-1992 7.02er00
KY07 CYN 21-jan-1992 LT 5.00er00
LJ04 PCP 21-jan-1992 LT 1.3 6er00
2A46DT
AG
BRMCIL
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
21-ian-1992 LT
21-;an-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-ian-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
4.88e-01
8.58e-02
6.25e-02
6.25er02
1.00ero2
5 .Ole-01
4.34e-01
3.26e-01
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGC
UGG
UCG
UCG
UCG
UCG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
LT UGG
5803 HG 21-jan-1992 LT 2.59e-02
UGG

Nay 22. 1992
STRM
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
File Type: CSE Sampling Dace Range: 01-jam-92 co 22-may-92
MeChod
Site ID Code Test Name
.~~._.. .._.
SE-19-EX10 JD13
JG13
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
5515
JSl5
JSl5
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JSl5
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JS15
JSl5
JSlS
JS15
JS15
KT04
KT04
KT04
KY07
LJ04
SE-26-EX18 99
99
99
99
99
99
99
AS
AS
AL
AL
BA
EA
BE
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
cu
cu
FE
FC
K
K
MG
MG
m
NA
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
V
ZN
NO2
NO3
NO3
CYN
PCP
2A46GT
AG
BRMCIL
LI
NG
NQ
TETR
Page 14
Meas,
Unic
Sample Date BOOl. Value Meas
__.._...... ..._. .__.. .._.
21 -jan-1992 1.20er01
21-jan-1992 1.80er01
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan-1992
2 1 - j an- 19 92
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-Jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1- jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
2 1 - j an- 1992
2 I - j an- 1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
LT
LT
NU
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.10er04
1.40e+04
5.80e+01
7.10e+Ol
3.44e-01
9.01e-01
3.80er04
4.50e+04
4.24e-01
1.40e+01
2.70e+01
4.17etOl
4.49ei00
7.83ei00
1.80ei04
4.10et04
9.50ero2
1.20er03
3.40e+03
9.10e+03
5.70er02
6.80e-02
1.05e+01
5.2OerOl
2.46er00
3.42e+00
I .70e+02
3.24e*01
8.60er01
8.00e+01
21- jan-1992 LT 3.16er00
21-jan-1992 4.99er00
21-jan-1992 5.16er00
21-jan-1992 LT 5.00er00
21-jan-1992 LT 1.36er00
22-jan-1992 LT 4.88e-01
22-jan-1992 LT 8.58e-02
22-jan-1992 LT 6 .25e-02
22-jan-1992 LT 1.00e-ro2
22-jan-1992 LT 5.01e-01
22-jan-1992 LT 4.34e-01
22-jan-1992 LT 3.26e-01
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UGC
UGG
UCC
UCC
UGG
UGC
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG

May 22. 1992 Page 15
CHEMICAL REPORT
Insfallacion: Jefferson Proving Ground lJF1
File Type: CSE Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method Meas.
SiCe m e Sife ID Code Test Name Sample D a~e Bool. Value
................ .... .................... ..... _____
STRM SE-26-EXl8 5803 HG 22-jan-1992 LT 2.59e-02
JD13 AS 22-jan-1992 1.70e+Ol
JS15 AL 22 - j an- 1992 1.10e+04
JS15 BA 22-Jan-1992 5.30e+01
JSl5 BE 22-jan-1992 3.45e-01
JS15 CA 22-jan-1992 4.80e+03
JS15 CD 22-jan-1992 LT 4.24e-01
JS15 co 22 - j an-1 9 92 LT 1.42e+00
JS15 CR 22-jan-1992 1.54er01
JS15 CU 22-jan-1992 5,16e+OO
JS15 FE 2 2 - j an- 19 92 2.10e+04
JS15 K 22-jan-1992 8.40et02
5515 MG 22 - j an- 19 92 2.70e+03
JS15 mi 22-jan-1992 6.50e+02
JS15 NA 22 - jan-1992 1.21ei02
JS15 NI 22 - j an- 19 92 LT 2.46e+00
JS15 SB 22-jan-1992 LT 3.42e+00
JS15 TL 22-jan-1992 LT 1.70er02
JS15 V 22-?an-1992 ....... 3 R7P+01
JS15 ZN 22-jan-iggZ LT 8.00ei01
KT04 NO2
KT04 NO3
22 -jan- 1992 LT 3.16e+00
22-jan-1992 5.79e+00
KY07 CYN 22-jan-1992 LT 5.00e+00
LJ04 PCP 22-jan-1992 LT 1.36erOO
RepGrf CGmplefed normally
Unif
Meas
.
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UGG
UCG
UCG
UGG

GROUNDWATER
SAMPLE RESULTS

May 22. 1992
Site m e
. . -. -. . WELL
WELL
WELL
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
FII~ ? y p e : e sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
* Non-detected compounds Included *
Method
Site ID Code
. -. . . ....
DU-MW1 UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
&2 6
W2 6
DU-MW10 UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW26
W26
DU-MW11 UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
DU-MWZ UW2 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
DU-MW3 UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW26
&2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW26
Test Name
. - -. . 135lNB
13 DNB
246m
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
l35lNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
135lNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
135TNB
13DNB
24611.lT
2 4 DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
w
NB
RDX
TETRYL
Meas.
sample Date BOOl.
..__....__.
ValUe
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-ian-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-Ian-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19->an-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19 - j an- 19 92
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19 - j an- 19 92
19-jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-ian-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16et00
l.llet00
8.69e-01
1.54er00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
1.11e+00
e.69e-01
1.54e+00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
l.Ile+OO
8.69e-01
1.54ei00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
l.lle+Oo
7.79e-01
1.54e+00
4.52e-01
1.91e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+O0
l.llet00
8.69e-01
1.54er00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
Page 1
Unit
Meas
..__
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1992
SiCe nipe
WELL
WELL
WELL
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 LO 22-may-92
Met hod
slce ID Code
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
DU-MW6 UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
DU-MW7 UW2 6
UW2 6.
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UW2 6
UWZ 6
G19-MW1 99
99
99
99
5803
SB03
SO24
rest Name
135TNB
13DNB
246T"T
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
135TNB
13DNB
246WT
24DNT
26DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
24DNT
2 6DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
2A46DT
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
HG
AG
Meas.
Sample Date Bool.
.___..-.___ __.._
18-Jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18 - j an-1 992
18 - j an-1 992
19-jan-1992
19 - j an- 1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-Jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-ian-1992
i9-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18- Jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
78-;an-1992
18-jan-1992
19-ian-1992
;9-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19- jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
19-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
la-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
1. iii+oo
8.69e-01
1.54e+00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16e+00
l.lle+OO
8.69e-01
1.54ei00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1,16e+00
l.llei00
8.69e-01
1.54ei00
6.17e-01
1.9le-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
7.67e-01
1.16ei00
l.llei00
8.69e-01
1.54e+00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
1.80e+00
5,10e+00
1.87er01
7.19e+00
5.66e-01
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
?age 2
Unlr
Meas
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L

May 22, 1992
Site Type
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File Vpe: CGW Sampling Date ~ange: 01-jan-92 to 2a-may-92
Method
Meas.
Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date BOOl. Value
. . - ._.. -........ _...._...__ __... ...._
G19-MWl SD24
SD24
5024
SD24
SO24
SD24
SD24
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
TYl2
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Un16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
AG
AS
AS
PB
PB
SE
SE
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
MG
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
13DCLB
14DCLB
24STCP
246TCP
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
24DNT
2 6DNT
2CLP
ZCNRP
ZMNAP
2MP
2NANIL
ZNP
33DCBD
3NANIL
21-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
2 1 - j an- 1992
18-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
21-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18 -;an-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
1R-inn-1992
~~ ~-..
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-;an-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan -1 992
18-jan-1992
1R-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-jai-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-I992
18 - j an- 19 92
18-Jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-I992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-,an-1992
18-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
ND
NE
LT
LT
ND
LT
NE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.16e-01
3.09ei00
3.50e+00
8.15et01
2.60et02
3.41e-01
4.70e+04
2.67et00
2.50er01
4.95ei00
8.85erOO
4.14er01
4 . iOe+03
5.20er04
1.4 le+02
1.50ei05
8.76er00
1.00ei01
1.00e+01
5.00et01 ~
5.50ei00
1.00er01
s.00e+01
1.00e+01
6.OOe-00
5.00e.01
Page 3
unit
Meas
_.._
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UG L

May 22, 1992
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inlcallation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File 'Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
MI6
UM16
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UMi6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
mi6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
WM16
WMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Test Name sample Date
4CLPPE
llMD
....
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
B2EHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMSO2
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEF
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
ESFSO4
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan- 1992
18 - jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan- 1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan- 1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan- 1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan- 1992
18-ian-1992
~~
18-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
IB-jan-iY92
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-I992
18-jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18- jan- 1992
MeaS
BOO1 Value
_._.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NE
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
m
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
NE
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
NE
LT
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
NO
LT
LT
ND
ND
1.00e+01
l.oOe+ol
5.00er01
5 00e+01
6.aoe+oO
3.20e+01
1.40ei01
I.OOe+Ol
2.30ei01
4.90e+00
2.ioe+oi
1.00e+01
1.50et01
8.30e+00
1.00er01
5,10e+00
3.00et01
5.90e+00
6.80ei00
1.00e*01
I . ooet 01
7.70rt00
I . 1Ur+Ol
1.UOt.*Ol
1.00e+01
1.50e+01
6,60e+00
6.00et00
6 .ooe+ao
Page 4
Unit
Meas
___.
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL.
UCL.
VGI.
116 L
UtiL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL

May 22, 1992
Site wipe
. . . . - . . .
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File V.pe: CGW sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
... ... ....
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
W16
UM16
UM16
UM16
W16
m16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
m3 3
UM33
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM33
m 3 3
UM33
UM3 3
m33
uM33
m33
m33
UM3 3
m33
UM33
UM33
m33
UM33
UM33
m 3 3
m 3 3
uM3 3
m33
uM33
Test Name
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
llDCLE
12DCE
l2DCLB
12DCLE
l2DCLP
12DMB
I3DCLB
13DCP
13DMB
14DCL8
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
C2RVE
CZH3CL
C2H5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
Sample Date
..._......_
18- jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18- jan-1992
le-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
le-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
le-jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18 - j an- 19 92
18-jan-1992
le-jan-1992
le-jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
18-Jan-1992
Meas.
Boo1 .
~....
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
m
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
NO
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
m
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
Value
....-
2 .ooe+01
I. OOetOl
1. 8OeiOl
6.20ei00
7.20e+00
7.20er00
1.00e+01
5.80e+00
3.00e+01
7.30e+00
1.70ei01
1.00e+01
4.50e+00
1.00ei01
9.10e+00
5.0Oe+01
2.20e+O1
1.00e+01
9.70e+00
9.30e+00
7.30e+00
4.70e+00
1.70e+01
4.10e+00
6.30e-01
1.42e+00
1.10e+00
1.10e+00
9.70e+00
7.60erOO
2.8oe+00
5.00r+00
9.20et00
3.eoe+oo
5,00e+00
8.lOe+00
8.20e+0 I
1. OOetOl
7.90et00
5. OOetOO
1.00et01
5.00e-01
2.12et00
2.40e+00
3.70e+00
4.51e+00
S.OOe+OO
1.60ei00
Page 5
Unic
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
uc L
UGL
IIGI.
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, :.)92
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Vpe: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-)an-92
Method
SiLe m e Site ID Code Tesc Name sample Da~e ..~ ...-.
~ ~.~...~ .... ..~...... ...._..._..
WELL G19-MW1 uM33
uM3 3
m3 3
uM3 3
m3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEX
MIBK
MNBK
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
18-jan-1992
18-ian-1992
18-;an-1992
18-jan-1992
18 - j an- 19 92
18-ian-1992
18-;an-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
18-jan-1992
Mea*.
BOOl. Value
._... .....
Page 6
Unit
Mea5
...~
LT
LT
LT
8.20erOO
8.30e-01
1.40er00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
LT
ND
ND
8.70e+O0
1.00er01
1.00et01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
ND
ND
1.00e+01
5.ooe+00
UGL
UGL
NO
LT
LT
LT
5.00e+00
4.70et00
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
MELI c 19 -m 10 99
99
2A46DT
NG
LT 1.82e+00
J9e-01
UGL
UG L
NQ
TETR
UGL
UG L
SB03
5803
HG
HG
8.78e-01
LT 5.66e-01
UGL
UGL
SD24 AG 20-ian-1992 LT 3.16e-01 UGL
SO24
SD24
5024
AS
PB
SE
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT 3.09ei00
LT 4.14e+00
LT 4. IOeiOO
UCL
UGL
UGL
SS16 AL 20-jan-1992 LT 8.15e+01 UiL
SS16 BA
20-jan-1992
UCI,
SS16 BA
20-jam-1992
uc L.
SS16 BE
2 0 - j an ~ 19 9 2
UGI.
SS16 CA
20-ian-I992
UGL
5516 CA 20-;an-1992 GT 1 .OOe+05 UGL
SS16 CD
20-jan-1992 LT 2.67ei00 UGL
SS16 co
20-jan-1992 LT 2.50er01 UGL
SS16 CR
20-ian-1992
6.37et00 UGL
5516 CR 20-;an-1992
UGL
5516 CU
20-jan-1992
UGL
SS16 cu
20-jan-1992
UGL
SS16 FE
20-jan-1992
UG L
SS16 FE
20-ian-1992
UGL
SS16 K 20-;an-1992 8.60e+03 UGL
SS16 K 20-jan-1992
9.60e+03 UGL
SS16 MG 2 0- jan-1992
3.10ei04 UGL
SS16 MG 20-jan-1992 GT 5.00e+04 UGL
SS16 MN 20-ian-1992 9.63e+01 UGL
SS16 UT4 20-;an-1992 1.19e+02 UGL

22. 1992
Site Wpe
CHEMlCAL REPORT
Insrallatlon: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Type: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . ~~~~
Test Name Sample Date
.......~~ ~.........~
WELL Gl9-MWIO SS16
5516
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
NA
NA
NI
SB
TL
TL
V
ZN
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
12 -map92
Value
Page 7
unit
Meas
_._.
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
TY12 CYN 20-jan-1992 LT 5.00e+00 UGL
UM16
UM16
UM16
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
UM16 13DCLB 20- jan-1992
UM16
UM16
uM16
14DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
UM16
UM16
24DCLP
24DMPN
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
~~~~
UMi6 24DNP 20-ian-1992
UM16 2 4 DNT 20-jan-1992
UM16 26DNT 20-jan-I992
W16 2CLP 20-jan-1992
UM16 2CNAP 20-ian-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
NO
ND
NE
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
UM16 2MNAP 20-;an-;992 ND
UMlb 2MP 20-jan-1992
UM16 2NANIL 20-jan-1992
UM16 2NP 20-jan-1992
UM16 33DCBD 20-ian-1992
UM16 ABHC 20-;an-1992
UM16 ACLDAN 20-jan-1992
UM16 AENSLF 20-jah-1992
UM16 ALDRN 20-jan-1992
UM16 ANAPNE 20-jan-1992
UM16 ANAPYL 20-jan-1992
UM16 ANTRC 2 0- jan-1992
UM16 B2CEXM 20-jan-1992
uM16 B2CIPE 20-jan-1992
UM16 82CLEE 20-jan-1992
ND
ND
ND
ND
No
ND
ND
ND
1.14et02
l.l0e+04
4.00et00
1.94eiOl
3.60e+Q0 UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
1.00ri01
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
ND i.ooe+oi UGL
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0oe+01
1.00ei01
5.00e+01
5.00et01
LT 6.80ei00
ND
ND
LT
3.00ei01
3.00er01
1.20er01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
LT 1.40er01 UGL
LT
LT
No
NO
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
LT 8.1oe+oO UGL

Md Y 22, 1992
File “fp
Site Type Site ID
...... ~~.
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
le: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
WELL G19-MWlO UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
B2EHP
Method
Code Tes c Name Sample Date
LM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI 6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMi6
UM16
UM16
Meas.
Bool. Value
Page 8
Unit
Meas
....
LT 1.20e+01 UGL
BBZP
BENSLF
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
NE
1.40e+01
1.00et01
2.30ei01
4.90er00
1.00e+01
6.00ei00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
BENZCA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
NE
LT
5.00et01
7,10e+00
Z.loe+Ol
1.00e+01
1.50erOl
8.10e+00
1.00e+01
5.10e+00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UCL
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSC
CPMSC2
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNCP
ENDRN
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
ND
LT
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
3.00ei01
5.90e+00
6.80e+00
3.80e+Ol
7.50e+00
6.40e+00
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
7.70ei00
1.10e+01
UCL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
ENDRNK
ESFSC4
NE
NE 6.00e+00
UGL
UGL
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
LT
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
NO
LT
LT
ND
2.00ei01
1.00e+01
1.80e+01
6.20et00
7.20ei00
7.20e+00
l.OOe+Ol
5. BOe+OO
1.00e+01
7.30e+00
1.70ei01
i.ooe+oi
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
LT
ND
LT
4.50er00
1. ooe.01
9. lOetOO
PC P
ND 5.00e+01
PHANTR
PHENOL
LT
NO
2.20e+01
1. ooe+o1
UCL
uc L
uc L
uc L
uc L
uc L

May 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Provlng Ground (JF)
File m e : CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
~...... ....
G19-MWIO uM16
UM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
m3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
m33
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
m33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
W 2 6
W 2 6
Test Name
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
11 lTCE
ll2TCE
IlDCE
llDCLE
l2DCE
l2DCLB
12DCLE
12DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13 DMB
14DCLB
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
CI3DCP
CZAVE
C2H3CL
C2H5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
CS2
DBRCLM
ETCbH5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNBK
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
135TNB
13DNB
Meas.
Unit
sample Date Bool. Value MeaS
..._...._.. ...__ __.._ ..._
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-I992
20-;an-1992
20 ~ jan- 1992
20 - jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-199i
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0- j an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
9.70et00
9.30e+00
7.30e+00
4 .70e+00
1.70ei01
4.10e+00
6.30e-01
1.42e+00
1.10er00
1.10e+00
9.70e+00
7.60ei00
2.00e+00
2.00e+00
9.2oet00
3.80e+00
5.00ei00
8.10e+00
8.20ei01
6.20er00
7.90ei00
5.00e+00
1.00ei01
5.00e-01
2.12eioo
2.40e+00
3.70ei00
3.53et00
1.00e+01
1.60e+00
8.20e+00
8.30e-01
1.40e+00
5,00e+00
6.50e+00
9.30er00
8.70e+00
1.00ei01
1.00e+01
1.00e+oi
5.00et00
5. OOeiO0
4.7nerao
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
3.88e-01
2.70e-01
Page 9
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UC L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
SlCe me
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
InscallaLion: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File Vpe: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site In
. . ..
Code
....
GIY-MWlO W26
uW2 6
uW2 6
uW2 6
W~ 2 ~~ 6
uW2 6
W 2 6
219-MW11 99
99
99
SEOI
SD24
so24
SD24
sm4
SO24
SS16
SSl6
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
TY12
Ut416
Test Name Sample D ate
......... ...........
246TNT
2 4 DNT
26nm
HMX
NE
Rnx
TETRYL
2A46DT
NG
TETR
HG
AG
AS
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
CU
FE
FE
X
K
MC
MG
MN
MN
NA
NA
NI
SE
TL
V
ZN
ZN
CYN
123TCB
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-:an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-I992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 19 92
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-:an-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jah-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-igqZ
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
Meas.
BOO1 . value
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
7.67e-01
1.16etOO
l.lle+Oo
8.69e-01
1.54ei00
6.17e-01
1.91e-01
1.82e+00
5.09e-01
7,19e+O0
5.66e-01
I. 16e-01
I .96e+00
4.49et00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
.1Se+01
.60e+02
.41e-01
.90e+04
.10e+04
.67e+00
.50e+01
.9ee+00
.86e+OO
.29e+00
. i6e+O2
.90e+02
.16et03
.21e+03
60ei04
80er04
71e.01
46e+02
70e+04
10e+04
76ei00
12er01
10er04
OOerOO
90e+01
94et01
5.00e+OO
3.60ei00
Page 10
Unit
Mea*
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL

May 22, 1992
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Ty0,e: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
.~..... ....
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMlb
UMI 6
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UM16
UMlb
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UMI 6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Test Name Sample Date
33DCBD
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
BZCEXM
BZCIPE
B2CLEE
BZEHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
17-Jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-Ian-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17- jan- 1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - jan- 1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
MeaS
BOO1
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
NE
NE
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
ND
NE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
MI
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
Value
2 .BOe+OO
l.OOe+Ol
8.50er00
4.40e+00
5.00e+01
1.00e+01
l.OOe+Ol
1.00e+01
5 .OOe+01
5.50e+00
6.60e+00
1.00e+01
9.60ei00
1.0Oe+01
1.00et01
5.00er01
1.00ei01
6.00e+00
5.00e+01
5.00erOl
1.00ei01
I. oor+o 1
1.00e+01
I .00e+01
1.00e+01
5.00ei01
5.00e+01
6.80e+00
3.00e+01
3.00ei01
l.ZOe+Ol
1.40e+01
1.9Oer01
2. OOeiOl
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
B.10e+00
3.20e+01
1.40ei01
1.00er01
2.30e+01
4.90ei00
1.00e+01
6.00erOO
5.00e+01
7.lOe+00
2. loerol
1.00e+01
1.50e+01
Page II
Unit
Mea5
._._
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UC L
uc L
UGL
uc L
UCL
UCL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L

May 22, 1992
site m e
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
InstallaClon: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . .._.
G19-MW11 UM16
UMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM3 3
UM13
UM3 3
UM33
UM3 3
UMl3
Test Name Samole D ate
...
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMSO2
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
ESFSO4
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHbNTR
PHENOL
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
1lITCE
ll2TCE
IIDCE
1 IDCLE
IZDCE
l2DCLB
17-Jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-Jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-I992
17-jan-1992
17 - jan - 1992
17- jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17 - j an- 19 92
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-Ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-I992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
IJFJ
to 22-may-92
Meas.
Baol. Value
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
M)
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.00e+01
7.20e+OO
7.20er00
l.O0e+01
5.80et00
3.00e+01
7.30e+00
1.70ei01
1.00e+01
4 .5Oe+OO
1.OOer0 1
9.lOe+00
5.00er01
2.20et01
l.Ooe+oi
9.70er00
9.30er00
7.30e+00
4.ioi+oo
1.70er01
4.10e+00
6.30e-01
1.42er00
I. IOe+00
1. ioe+00
3.7Ue-UO
Page 12
Unit
Meas
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L
llGL
UG L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UOL
UOL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
uc L
UGL
UG L
UCL

i 22. 1992
site Type
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallatian: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Tyw: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92
Method
Slte ID Code Test Name Sample Date
G19-MW11
G19-MW12
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
m3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
m3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
12DCLE
12DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13DMB
14DCL5
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
CZAVE
C2H3CL
C2H5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH35R
CHJCL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
cs2
17- Jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-Ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17- jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-Ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-3 an- 1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
IJFi
to i 12 -may - 9 2
Meas.
BOOi.
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
m
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
~ LT
LT
LT
Value
5 .OOerOO
8.10e+00
8.20ei01
6.60e+00
7.90e400
5.00er00
1.00e+Ol
5.00e-01
2.12e+00
2.40e+00
3.70ei00
4.31e+00
5.00ei00
Page 13
unit
Me.%?
_...
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
uM3 3
u~33
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
m33
uM3 3
DBRCLM
ETChH5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNBK
S'TYR
T13DCP
TCl.E.4
~ ~~
TCLEE
TRCLE
17-ian-1992
17-;an-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-;an-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-ian-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
17-jan-1992
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
LT
ND
Ne
NE
Ne
NE
1.T
~~
LT
LT
1.60ei00
8.20e+00
8.30e-01
1.40et00
5.00e+00
6.50ei00
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
99
99
99
2R460T
NG
NQ
TETR
20 -1 an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.82e+00
5.09e-01
1.87e.01
7.19e+00
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
SBO3 HG
20-jan-1992 LT 5.66e-01 UCL
SO24 AC 2 0 ~ j an - I9 92
5024 AS 20-jan-1992
SD24 PB 20-jan-1992
SD24 SE 20-jan-1992
SS16 AL 20-jan-1992
SS16 AL 20-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.16e-01
3.04e+00
4.74e.00 . ~~ ~.
4.10e+oo
4.3 1e+02
8.15eiO1
uc L
UCL
uc L
UG L
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1492
Site m e
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installacion: Jefferson P roving Ground IJF)
File Wpe: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-mav-92
Method
Site ID Code
....
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
W16
UMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
0516
UM16
UMl6
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
TeSt Name Sample Dafe
13DCBD
3NANIL
46DNZC
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AFNSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
BZCEXM
82CIPE
BZCLEE
B2EHP
BARNTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMS02
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DE?
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
20-jan-1992
20-$an-1992
20- jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20- j an-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-lg92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-l992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-19’32
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
0001. Value
ND
NE
ND~
No
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
LT
ND
m
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
NO
LT
LT
NO
LT
LT
NO
LT
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
5.00ei01
5. ooe+oi
6.80e+00
3.00erOl
3 .OOe+01
1.20ei01
1.4 Oer 01
i.gne+ol
z.noe+oi
1.00er01
1. nOe+oi
8. lOerOO
1.20e+oi
1.40er01
i.ooe+oi
2.10e+01
4 .goe+on
i.ooe+ni
6.00et00
5.00er01
7.10e+00
2.10e+01
1.00e+01
l.SOe+Ol
8.30etOO
1.00e+01
5.10er00
3.00er01
5.90e+00
6.80e+00
3.80ei01
7.50e+00
6.40ei00
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
7.70er00
1.10e+0 1
1.ooe+01
1.00e+01
1.50er01
6.60e+00
Page 15
Unit
MC?.3S
___.
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL

y 22, 1992
Site m e
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: ~efferson Proving Ground
File ‘Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92
IJF)
to 2 !2-may-92
Method
Meas.
Site ID Code TesC Name Sample Date Bool.
. -. . .... .__...... ._....._... _....
G19 -Mw12 UM16 ENORNK 20-jan-1992 Nc
UM16 ESFS04 20-jan-1992 ND
UM16 FANT 20-jan-1992 LT
UM16 FLREXE 20-Jan-1992 ND
UM16 HCBD 20-jan-1992 LT
LW16 HPCL 20-jan-1992 LT
UMi6 HPCLE 20- jan-1992 LT
UM16 ICDPYR 20-jan-1992 LT
L1.116 ISOPHR 20- jan- 1992 ND
UM16 LIN 20-jan-1992 LT
UM16 MEXCLR 20-jan-1992 ND
UM16 MLTHN 20-ian-1992 LT
UM16 NAP 20-jan-i992 LT
UM16 NR 20-Jan-1992 Nc
UM16 NDNPA 20-,an-1992 LT
UM16 “DPA 20-jan-1992 ND
UM16 OXAT 20- jan- 1992 LT
uM16 PCP 20-jan-1992 ”2
UM16 PHbNTR 20- jan- 1992 LT
UM16 PHENOL 20-jan-1992 NO
UM16 PPDDD 20-ian-1992 LT
UM16 PPDDE 20-jan-1992 LT
UM16 PPDDT 20-jan-1992 LT
UM16 PRTHN 20-jan-1992 LT
UM16 PYR 20-jan-1992 LT
UM33 lllTCE 20-jan-1992
UM3 3 112TCE 20-jan-1992
UM3 3 1 lDCE 2 0 - j an- 19 92
uM33 llDCLE 20-ian-1992
UM3 3 12DCLB 20-;an-1992
UM3 3 l2DCLE 20-jan-1992
UM3 3 l2DCLP 2 0 - j an- 19 92
UM3 3 l2DMB 20-ian-1992
uM3 3 13DCLB 20-jan-1992
UM3 3 UOCP 20-jan-1992
UM3 3 13DMB 20- Jan-1992
UM33 14DCLR 20-jan-1992
UM33 2CLEVE 20-jan-1992
UM3 3 ACET 20-,an-1992
UM3 3 BRDCLM 20-jan-1992
LM13 C13DCP 20-ian-1992
UM33 CZAVE 20 -,an- 1992
CZH3CL 20-$an-1992
ISCL 20-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
Value
.....
6.00er00
6,00e+OO
2.00et01
Page 16
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
7.20e+00 UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
I .ioe+oi
1.00ei01
4.5Oe+00
1 .ooe+01
9.10e+00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
4.10ei00 UGL
6.30e-01 UGL
1.42eiOO UGL
1.10e+00 UGL
1.10e+00 UGL
9.70e+00 UGL
7.60e+00 UGL
2 .BOe+OO UGL
2.00et00 UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
8.20e+01 UG L
1.00e*01 UG L
7.90r+00 uz L
5 . OOr + 110 UCL.
1 .ooe. 1) I UGL
5.00e-01 UCL
uc;1.
UGL
UCL
UG L

May 22. 1992 Page 17
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallacion: Jefferson P roving Ground (JF)
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method Meas. Unit
Site m e Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date 6001. Value MeaS
..~~-.... ......_ .... ......... .___...._.. ..... ..... ....
WELL
WELL
G19-MW12
G19-Mwl3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
.uM3 3
uM3 3
99
99
99
99
5803
5803
CH3BR 20-jan-1992 ND 1.00e+01 UGL
CH3CL 20- jan-1992 LT 1.60ei00 UG L
CHBR3 20-jan-1992 LT B .20e+00 UGL
CHCL3 20-jan-1992 LT 8.30e-01 UGL
CLC6H5 20-jan-1992 LT 1.40e+00 UGL
cs2 20-jan-1992 ND 5.00er00 UGL
DBRCLM 20 - jan-I992 LT 6.50e+00 UGL
ETC6H5 20-jan-1992 LT 9.30ei00 UGL
MEC6H5 20 - jan-1992 LT 8.70er00 UGL
MEK 20-jan-1992 ND I. 00e+01 UGL
MIBK 20-jan-1992 Nc 1.0oei01 UGL
MNBK 20 - jan-1992 Nc 1,00e+01 UGI
STYR 20-jan-1992 ND 5.00ei00 UGL
T13DCP 2 0- jan-1992 ND 5.0Oe+00 UGL
TCLEA 20-jan-1992 LT 4.70e+00 UGL
TCLEE 20-jan-1992 LT 5.00e-01 UGL
TRCLE 20-jan-1992 LT 5.00e-01 UGL
2A46DT 20-ian-1992 LT
NG
NQ
TETR
HC
HG
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
1.82et00
5.09e-01
1.87et01
7.19ei00
1.09ei00
5.66e-01
SD24 AG
20-jan-1992 LT 3.16e-01
SD24 AS
20-jan-1992 LT 3.09e+00
SD24 PB
20- jan-1992 LT 4.74e+00
SD24 SE
20-jan-1992 LT 4.10etoo
LT
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
SS16 AL
20-jan-1992
1.1eer02 UGL
SS16 AL
20-jan-1992 LT 8.lSeiOl UG L
5516 BA
20-jan-1992
3.50er02 UGL
5516 BE
20-jan-1992 LT 3.4le-01 UGL
SS16 CA
20-jan-1992
9.20e+04 UGL
SS16 CA
20-ian-1992
9.90e+04 UGL
5516 CD
20-jan-1992 LT 2.67ei00 uc L
SSl6 CO
20-jan-1992 LT 2,50e+01
SSi6 CR
20-jan-1992
6.78e+OO
SS16 CR
20-jan-1992
8.57etOO
SSl6 CU
20-jan-I992
6.44e+Oo
SSl6 CU
20-jan-1992 LT 4.79e.ou UGL
SS16 FE
20-jan-1992
4.90etOZ UtiL
SS16 FE
20-jan-1992 LT 2.46e+0 I UCL
SS16 K
20-ian-1992
l.lle+03 UCL
SS16 K
20-jan-1992
1.36ei03 UCL
SS16 MG
20-jan-1992
3.80e+04 UG L
SS16 MG
20-jan-1992
3.90et04 UGL

Hay 22.
sice
WE1
1992
m e
CHEMiCAL REPORT
Inscallaelon: ~effersan proving round
File Wpe: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92
Method
SiCe ID Code Test Name Sample Date
~~..... .... ......... .........._
G19-MW13 SS16
5516
MN
m
20-Ian-1992
20-jan-1992
SS16 NA 20-jan-1992
SS16
5516
SS16
NA
NI
SB
2 0 - j an-19 92
20 - jan-1992
20-ian-1992
SS16 TL 20-jan-1992
SS16 TL 20-jan-1992
SS16 V 20-jan-1992
SS16 ZN 20-jan-1992
TY12 CYN 20-jan-1992
UM16 123TCB 20-jan-1992
UM16 124TCB 20-ian-1992
UM16 IZDCLB
UM16 13DCLB
UM16
UM16
14DCLB
24STCP
UM16 246TCP 20-jan-1992
UM16 24DCLP 20-ian-1992
UM16 24DMPN 20-jan-1992
UM16 24DNP 20-jan-1992
UM16 2 4 DNT 20-jan-1992
UM16 26DNT 20-jan-1992
UM16 2CLP 20-jan-1992
UM16 2CNAP 20-jan-I992
UM16 2MNAP 20-jan-1992
UM16
UM16
2MP
2NANIL
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
UM16 ZNP
20-jan-1992
UM16 33DCBD 20-jan-I992
UM16
UMI 6
3NANIL
46DN2C
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
UM16 4BRPPE 20-jan-1992
UM16 4CANIL 20-jan-1992
UM16
UM16
UM16
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
UM16 4NRNIL 20-jan-1992
UM16 4NP
20-jan-1992
UM16
UM16
ABHC
ACLDAN
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
UM16
UM16
ANTRC
BZCEXM
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
IJFI
to 22-may-92
Meas.
Uni c
Bool. Vallle MeaS
..._. __._. ._..
1.52e+02
3.40e+02
2.40e+04
2.50e+04
LT 8.76e+00
LT 5. l2erOl
LT 1.14et02
LT l.l0e+04
LT 4.00er00
LT 1.94e+Ol
LT 5.00ei00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
LT
LT
LT
LT
3.60et00
2.80ei00
1.00e+01
8.Soet00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
LT 4.40ei00 UGL
ND
m
ND
5,00e+01
1.00e+01
I .ooe+01
UGL
UGL
UGL
ND
NE
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
1.00er01
5.00et01
5.5Oe+OO
6.60ri00
1.00er01
9.60er00
I. ooeio 1
UCL
UCI.
UGL
IJGL.
UG L
UGL
UGL
ND
NE
m
1.00e*01
5.00e+01
1.00et01
UG L
UGL
UGL
NE 6.00e+00 UGL
ND
m
NE
s.00et01
5.00e+Ol
1.0oet01
UGL
UGL
UG L
NE 1.00ei01 UGL
NE 1.00e+01 UGL
NE 1.00e+01 UGL
NE 1.00e+01 UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
ND 3.00e+01 UGL
LT 1.20eio1 UGL
LT 1.40e+01 UGL
LT
LT
m
1.90e+01
2.0oe+01
1.00er01
UGL
UG L
UGL

sire m e
. . . . . . . . .
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
InSCallatlOn: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
File 'Pipe: CCW Sampling ate Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
site ID Code
....
G19-MW13 UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI 6
UMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UMl6
UM16
MI6
UM16
UX16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Teat Name Sample Date
. .
B2CIPE
B2CLEE
B2EHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMS02
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
ESFS04
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
20 - jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-ian-1992
2O-jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
~ ~~
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-ian-1992
2O-jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
Baal.
.....
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
ND
6.ao~+oo
1.00e+01
7.70er00
1.10et01
1.00ei01
1.00e+01
2. O OerOl
1. ooer01
i.aoe+oi
6.2oe+no
7.20e+00
7.20e+00
1.00ei01
5.8ne+no
3.ooe+ni
1.00ei01
9. iOe+00
5 .OOe+nl
Page 19
Unlt
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
uc L
UG L
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992 Page 20
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Type: CGW Sampllng Date Range: 01-Jan-92 co 22-may-92
Method Meas. Unit
Site m e siLe ID Code Test Name Sample Date BOOl. Value MeaS
......~~ ......~ .... ......... ......_____ ..... ..... ....
WELL G19-MWl3 UM16 PHANTR 20-Jan-1992 LT 2.2Oe+Ol UGL
uM16 PHENOL 20-jan-1992 No 1.00e+01 UGL
uM16 PPDDD 20-Jan-1992 LT 9.70e+00 UGL
uM16 PPDDE 2 0 - j an- 19 92 LT 9.30ei00 UGL
UMi6 PPDDT 20 - jan-1992 LT 7.30e+00 UGL
uM16 PRTHN 20-jan-1992 LT 4.70e+00 UGL
uM16 PYR 20-jan-1992 LT 1.70et01 UCL
WELL G19-MW17 99
uM33 lllTCE 20- Jan-1992 LT 4. lOerOO UGL
uM3 3 ll2TCE 20-jan-1992 LT 6.30e-01 UG L
uM3 3 1 lDCE 2 0- jan-1992 LT 1.42e+O0 UGL.
uM3 3 llDCLE 20-jan-1992 LT 1.10e+00
uM33 12DCE 20-jan-1992 LT 1.lOeiOO UGL
uM3 3 12DcLB 20-jan-1992 LT 9.70eiOO UGL
uM3 3 12DCLE 20-jan-1992 LT 7.60e-00 UG L
uM33 l2DCLP 20-jan-1992 LT 2. noe+oo UGL
uM3 3 l2DMB 2 0 - jan- 1992 ND 2.00e*00 UGL
uM33 I3DCLB 20-jan-1992 LT 9.20e+00 UGL
UM3 3 13DCP 20-jan-1992 LT 3.80ei00 UGL
uM3 3 13DMB 20-jan-1992 ND 2.0oe+00 UGL
UM33 14DCLB 20-jan-1992 LT 8.10e+00 UGL
UM3 3 2CLEVE 20-jan-1992 LT 8.20e+01 UGL
uM3 3 ACET 20-jan-1992
6.10ei00 UGL
uM3 3 BRDCLM 20-jan-1992 LT 7.90e+00 UGL
UM33 C13DCP 20-jan-1992 ND 5.00et00 UGL
uM3 3 C2AVE 20-jan-1992 ND 1.00e+01 UGL
UM3 3 C2H3CL 20-Jan-1992 LT 5.00e-01 UGL
uM3 3 C2H5CL 20-jan-1992 LT 2.12ei00 UGL
C6H6 20-jan-1992 LT 2.40e+00 UGL
CCL4 20-jan-1992 LT 3.70et00 UG L
CH2CL2 20-jan-1992
4.02eiOO UGL
CH3BR 20-jan-1992 NE 1.00e+01 UGL
uM3 3 CH3CL 20-jan-1992 LT 1.60et00 UGL
uM3 3 CHBR3 20-jan-1992 LT n.20ei00 UGL
uM33 CHCL3 20-jan-1992 LT 8.30e-01 UGL
uM3 3 CLC6H5 20-jan-1992 LT 1.40er00 UGL
uM33 cs2 20-jan-1992 ND 5.00ei00 UGL
UM31 DBRCLM 20-jan-1992 LT 6.50e+00 UGL
uM3 3 ETC6H5 20-jan-1992 LT 9.30er00 UGL
uM3 3 MEC6H5 20-jan-1992 LT 8.70e+00 UGL
uM3 3 MEK 20-jan-I992 ND 1.00er01 UGL
uM3 3 MIBK 20-jan-1992 ND 1.00e+oi UG L
uMl3 MNBK 20-jan-1992 NO 1.00eiOi UGL
uM33 STYR 20-jan-1992 ND 5.00et00 UGL
uM3 3 T13DCP 20-jan-1992 NO 5.00ei00 UC L
uM13 TCLEA 20-jan-1992 LT 4 .70e+00 UGL
uM33 TCLEE 20-ian-1992 LT 5.00e-01 UGL
UM33 TRCLE 20-;an-1992 LT 5.00e-01 uc L
ZA46DT 20-jan-1992 LT 1.82er00 UGL

Mav 22. 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFJ
File Vpe: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 Co 22-may-92
SD24
SO24
SD24
SD24
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SSl6
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
5.716
SS16
SS16
SS16
5.916
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
TY12
LM16
LM16
W16
UM16
UM16
UM16
W16
LM16
Test Name Sample Date
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
cu
cu
FE
FE
K
K
MC
MG
m
MN
NA
NA
NI
SB
TL
TL
v
ZN
CY"
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
13DCLB
I4DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
24DCLP
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 ~ jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
2 0- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Ian-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - I an - I992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
MeaS
BOO1
....
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
Value
5.09e-01
1.87e+01
7.19et00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09et00
4.74e+00
4.10er00
8.15ei01
1.50e+02
3.41e-01
9.50er04
1.00ei05
2.67e+00
2.50ei01
7.17et00
7.58ei00
8.47e+00
4.29e+00
7.04ei01
2.46e+01
2.00ei02
5.00er02
2.80e+04
2.90e+04
8.76e+00
5.12e+01
1.10er03
1.10et04
4 .00e+00
1.94ei01
5.00et00
3.60er00
2.80et00
1.00er01
8.50ei00
4.40ei00
5.0Oe+01
1. OOerOl
1.00er01
Page 21
Unlt
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
uc L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UG L
UCL
UCL
UG L
UG L
UCL.
UG L
UG I_
uc L
UG L
UG L
uc L
uc L
UGL
UG L
UG L

y 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallacion: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Wipe: CGW sampling ate ~ange: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date
~~~.... ...~ ......... ...........
(JFJ
to 22 -map92
value
Page 22
Unit
Meas
....
WELL G19-MWl7 UM16
UM16
24DMPN
24DNP
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
ND
No
UGL
UGL
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
2 4 DNT
26DNT
ZCLP
2CNAP
20-ian-1992
2 0 - j an - 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
LT
LT
ND
LT
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
ND
UGL
UM16
UM16
UM16
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
20-;an-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
ND
NE
ND
UGL
UGL
UGL
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
33DCBD
3NANIL
4 6DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
2 0 - j an - 1992
20-jan-1992
20-Ian-1992
20-ian-1992
zo-jai-i99i
20-jan-1992
2 0- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-ian-1992
io -; an- is 92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
~~
ND
ND
ND
ND
LT
m
NE
LT
LT
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG ~~ L
UGL
ANAPYL
TC
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
LT
UGL
UG L
ND
UGL
ND
UG L
LrN16 B2CLEE 20-jan-1992
LT
UGL
UM16 BZEHP 20-jan-1992
LT
UGL
UM16
UM16
BAANTR
BAPYR
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
LT
LT
UGL
UGL
UM16
UM16
BBFANT
BBHC
20-;an-1992
20-jam-1992
LT
LT
UGL
UCL
UM16
UM16
UM16
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
NO
ND
NO
UGL
uc L
UG L
UM16
UMi6
BGHIPY
BKFANT
20-ian-1992
LT
UGL
UGL
UM16
LrNl6
UM16
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
NO
LT
LT 8.30e+00
UG L
UGL
UGL
UM16 CL6CP 20-jan-1992
ND
UCL
UM16
UM16
UM16
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
ND
LT
UGL
UGL
UGL
UM16
UM16 CPMSO2
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
LT
6.eoe+oo
3 .eoe+oi
UG L
UGL

May 22, L992
Site Type
.~... ..
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
InsCallaLlan: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
F11e Type: CCW sampling Dace ~ange: 01-jan-92 LO 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code Test Name Samole Dace
.. .... .~~~ ~...... ..
G19-MWi7 UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Un16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
mi6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM3 3
UM33
uM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM33
m33
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM33
UM3 3
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
m R N
ENDRNK
ESFS04
F W
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISCPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHANTR
PHENOL
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
lllTCE
ll2TCE
llDCE
llDCLE
l2DCE
l2DCLB
l2DCLE
l2DCLP
l2DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13 DMB
14DCLB
20-jan-1992
7.0-jan-1992
2 0-ian-1992
i 0 -3 an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20 -5an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
io-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-3.3"-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-l992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-,an-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
BOOl.
.....
LT
LT
No
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
NO
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
Value
.....
7.50e+00
6.40er00
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
7.70er00
1.10e+01
1.00e+01
1,00e+01
1.50e+01
6.60e+00
6.00e+00
6.00et00
2.00ec01
1.00e+01
1.80e+01
6.20er00
7.20e+00
7.2Oe+00
1.00e+01
5.8OeiOO
3.00e+01
7.30er00
1.70e+01
1.00er01
4 .50e+00
1.00e*01
9.100+00
5.00e+Ol
2.20e+01
1.00e+01
9.70e+00
9.30e+00
7.30e+00
4.70et00
1.70e+01
4.lOetOO
6.3Oe-01
1.42er00
1.10e+o0
1.lOerOO
9.70e+00
7.60et00
2.80e+00
2 .ooe+oo
9.20e+00
3. BOetOO
5.00e+00
8.10e+00
Page 23
Unit
Meas
____
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UC L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UCL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL

Site m e
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installacion: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
File Type: CGW sampling ~ a Range: ~ e 01-jan-92 LO 22-may-92
Method
Site ID
. . . .
Code
....
G19-MW17 uM33
uM33
m33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
LlM3 3
uM3 3
m3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
m33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
Gi9-\IW2 99
99
99
5803
SB01
SO24
SO24
SO24
SD24
5.516
SS16
SS16
5.916
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
Test Name Sample Date ValUe
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
C2AVE
C2H3CL
C2H5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNB K
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
2A46DT
NG
TETR
HG
HG
RG
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20- Jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20- j an-1992
2 0-ian-1912
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-?an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
2 0- jan-1592
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0- Jan-I992
20-Jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-

say 22, 1992
Site nipe Site ID
WELL G19-MW2
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFJ
File Type: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Code Test Name Sample Date
._~~ ..
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
TY12
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
MI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
CR
CU
CU
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
MN
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
13DCLB
14DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
24DNT
26DNT
2CLP
2CNAP
2MNAP
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
33DCBD
3NANIL
46DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-Jan-1992
16-ian-1992
i6-;an-i992
16 - j an-19 92
16 - jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan-I992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan- 1992
16 - jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
MeaS
BOO1
....
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
No
ND
MD
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
ND
No
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MD
ND
ND
LT
value
.....
7.45etOO
6.05erOO
4.29e+00
3.32e+01
2.54e+02
1.06e+03
1.30et03
3.40e+04
3.50e+04
7.71et01
1.05e+02
l.SOer05
8.76e+00
5.12e+01
1,14e+02
4.00e+00
1.94e.01
5,00e+00
3.60e+OO
2.80*+00
I. 00e+01
B.50e+O0
4.40e+00
5.00et01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
5.00er01
5.50e+00
6.60e+00
1.00ei01
9.60e-00
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
5.00e+01
1.00et01
6 .OOe+00
5.0Oei01
5.00e+01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
1.00er01
1.00ei01
1,00e+01
5.00er01
5.00e+01
6.80e+00
Page 25
Unit
MeaS
_.._
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UCL.
1lGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
I nscallacion: Jefferson Proving Ground
File ‘T~K ,e: CGW Sampling Da~e Range: 01-jan-92
Site ID
Method
Code Test Name Sample Dace
..~~ ..~.~.... ...........
(JF)
CO 22 -map92
Meas.
BOOl.
value
G19-M.12 UM16 RCLDAN 16-Jan-1992 No 3.00e+01
UM16 AENSLF 16-jan-1992 ND 3.00ei01
UM16 RLDRN 16-ian-1992 LT 1.20e+01
UM16 ANAPNE 16-;an-1992 LT 1.40ei01
UM16 ANAPYL 16 - j an-1 9 92 LT
UM16 ANTRC 16-Jan-1992 LT
UM16 B2CEXM 16-jan-1992 ND
UM16 BZCIPE 16- jan-1992 hm i.ooe+oi
UMl6 B2CLEE 16-jan-1992 LT 8.lOeiOO
UM16 BZEHP 16- jan- 1992 LT 3.20et01
UM16 BAANTR 16-ian-1992 LT 1.40e+01
LT 1.00e+01
UM16 BBFANT 16-jan-1992 LT 2.30e+01
UM16 BBHC 16-jan-1992 LT 4.90e+00
UM16 BBZP 16-Jan-1992 ND 1 .OOe+Ol
UM16 BENSLF 16-ian-1992 ND 6.00etOO
uM1.116 BENZOA 16-

May 22, 1992
Site nipe
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation; Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Type: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
s1ce ID Code
S19-MW2 uM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
uM16
UM16
uM16
uM16
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
m3 3
uM33
uM3 3
m33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 1
uM3 3
m3 3
uM33
uM33
m33
Test Name Sample Date
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHANTR
PHENOL
Pmnn
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
IllTCE
ll2TCE
llDCE
l2DCE
I~DCLB
12DCLE
12DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13DMB
ZCLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
C2AVE
C2H3CL
C2H5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
16-Ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-Jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-Ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - jan-1992
16- j an-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - j an- 19 92
16 - jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
Meas.
Bool. ValUe
LT
LT
ND
LT
NL?
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
NO
LT
LT
LT
NO
ND
7.30e+00
1.70e+01
1.00eiOl
4.50e+00
1.00et01
9. lOetOO
5.00e+01
2.20ei01
1 .ooe+01
9.70e+OO
9,30e+00
7.30ei00
4.70e.00
1.70ei01
4.10ei00
6.30e-01
1.42ei00
1.10e+00
1.10e+00
9.70ei00
7.60e+00
2.80e+00
5.00ei00
9.20e+00
3.80et00
5.noe+oo
8.10er00
8.20e+01
6,00e+00
7.90e+00
5.00et00
1. DOeiOl
5.0Oe-01
2.12e+00
2.40e+00
3.7neroo
4.90e+00
5.00er00
1.60e+00
8.2oe+00
8.30e-01
I .40e+00
5.00e+00
6.50e+00
9,30e+00
8.70er00
I .00e+01
i.noe+oi
Page 21
unit
Meas
__..
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UCL
UCL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UCL
UCL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
Method
Site Type Site ID Code
.... ~... . ..
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 tO 22-may-92
UM33
m3 1
SB03
SO24
SO24
SD24
SD24
TYlZ
UM33
UM33
UM33
uM3 3
UM33
m3 3
UM33
uM3 3
UM33
m33
UM33
m3 3
uM3 3
UM13
uM33
uM33
UM13
UM3 3
uM3 3
m33
UM33
UM33
UM33
UM3 3
uM3 3
m33
UM3 1
uM33
Test Name Sample Date
MNBK
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
2A46DT
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
CYM
IllTCE
IIZTCE
llDCE
llDCLE
12DCE
12DCLB
l2DCLE
12DCLP
l2DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
UDMB
13DMB
14DCLB
ZCLEVE
ACET
ACET
BRDCLM
Cl3DCP
CZAVE
C2 H3 Cl.
CZH5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CHZCLZ
CH3BR
CHICL
16-jan-1992
16- jan- 1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-?an-1992
16- jan- 1992
22-jan-1992
22 - jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22 - jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22- jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-ian-1992
22-?an-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jaw1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-ian-1992
22-;an-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
Meas
BOOl.
__...
ND
ND
NU
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
ND
NO
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
Value
...._
1.00ei01
5.00e+OO
5,OOetOO
4.70e+00
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
1.82et00
5.09e-01
1.87et01
7.19e+00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4,74e+00
4 .lOe+00
5.00e+00
4.10e+00
6.30e-01
1.42e+00
1.10e+00
1.10e+00
9.70et00
7.60et00
2.80e+00
2.00e+oo
9.20e+00
3, 80ei00
2. 00eioo
5.00er00
8,1Oe+O0
8.20er01
6.30ei00
7.00e+00
7.90e+00
5. OOerOO
1.00ei01
5.00e-01
2.12e+00
2.40er00
3.70e+00
4 .80e+00
4.90e+00
1.00ei01
1.60e+00
Page 28
Uni c
MeaS
._..
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL

ay 22. 1992
site Type
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallatian: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFI
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 co 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
GI9 -M!!3 uM3 3
m3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
W 2 6
W 2 6
UWZ 6
UW2 6
W2 6
UW2 6
W 2 6
W 2 6
W 2 6
G19-MW4 99
99
99
99
SB03
5803
SD24
SD24
so24
so24
SS16
SSl6
SSl6
5516
SS16
SS16
5.916
SS16
SS16
SS16
Test Name Sample Date
CHBRI
CHCL3
CLC6H5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNBK
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
135TNB
13DNB
246TNT
2 4 DNT
2 6 DNT
HMX
NB
RDX
TETRYL
2A46DT
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
CO
CR
CR
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22 - jan- 1992
22-ian-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22-jan-1992
22 - jan-1992
22-jan-1'392
22-jan-1992
22-ian-1992
22-;an-1992
22-jan-1992
22-ian-1992
22-;an-1992
22-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-?an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas
BOO1
._..
LT
LT
LT
No
LT
LT
LT
m
NE
No
ND
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
' LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Value
.2oe+00
.30e-01
.40e+00
.00e+00
.50e+00
.30e+00
.70e+00
.OOe+01
.oae+oi
.00e+01
.aoe+oo
.00e+00
.70e+00
.00e-01
.00e-01
.88e-01
.70e-01
.67e-01
.16e+00
,11e+00
69e-01
54eiOO
17e-01
91e-01
1.82e+00
5.09e-01
1.87ei01
7,19e+OO
2.lZerOO
5.66r-01
3.16e-01
3.09ei00
4.74er00
4,10e+00
8.15eiOl
3.30er02
3.50e+02
3.41e-01
5.70e+04
6.40e+04
2.67ei00
2.50e+01
4.99ei00
6.42e+O0
Page 29
Unic
MeaS
.-..
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
uc L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL

May 22. 1992
Site Type
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installaclon: Jefferson P roving Ground iJFl
File lVpe: CCW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
.~..... ..
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
TY12
UM16
UM16
W16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMIO
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMlb
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
MI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UX16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Test Name sample Date
. . - -. . CU
CU
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
MN
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
123TCB
124TCB
l2DCLB
13DCLB
14DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
2 4 DNT
26DNT
2CLP
ZCNAP
2MNAP
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
33DCBD
3NANIL
46DNZC
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
- - -.
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20 - jan-1992
20 - jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20 ~ jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
0001.
._...
LT
LT
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
MD
ND
LT
ND
Value
.....
1.07et01
4.29er00
1,95e+02
2.46e+01
5.00et03
6.10ei03
2.60e+04
3.30e+04
7.70ei01
8.68e+01
1.50e+05
8.76e+00
5.12ei01
1.14e+02
4.00er00
1.94ei01
5.00eiOO
3.60e+00
2.80et00
1.00ei01
8.50e+00
4.40er00
5.00ei01
1.00e+01
1.00e*ol
I. oor+o 1
5. OOeiOl
s.s0e*00
~~
n.60e.UV
1.00et01
9.60e+00
1. OOerOl
1.00e+01
s.00et01
1.00e+01
6.00ei00
5.OOerOl
1.00ei01
1.00ei01
1.00et01
1.00e+01
I .00e+01
5.00ei01
5. OOeiOl
6,80e+00
3.00et01
Page 30
Unit
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UCI.
UGL
UCL
UGI.
UG L
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L

*lay 22, 1992
Slte Type
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson P roving Ground IJF)
File Type: CCW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
site I D Code
UM16
UN16
UMl 6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
m i 6
UM16
UM16
UM16
M16
UM16
UM16
m16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMi6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Test Name Sample Date
~.
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
B2CExM
BZCIPE
B2CLEE
B2EHP
BWTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMS02
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
ESFS04
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- j an-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an-19 92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
MeaS
BOO1
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
NE
NE
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
NO
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
NE
ND
LT
LT
m
NO
LT
m
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
value
3.00e+Ol
1.20e+01
1.4 Oe+ 01
1.90e+01
2.00e+01
1,00e+01
1. ooei 01
t?.lOe+OO
3.20e+Ol
1.40ei01
1.00e+01
2.30e+01
4.90e+00
1.00e+01
6.00e+00
5.00er01
7. l OeiOO
2.10er01
1.00e+01
I .iOe*OI
8.10e400
I .00e*oi
5.10r+00
3.00etOl
5.90e+00
6.BOeiOO
3.80e+01
7.50et00
6.4 Oei 00
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
7.70e+00
1.10e+01
1.00e+01
1.00ei01
1.50ei01
6.60e+00
6.00e+00
6.00e+00
2.00et01
1.00e+01
1.80ei01
6.20er00
7.20e+00
7.20et00
1.00e+01
5.80ei00
3.00e+01
7.30e+00
Page 31
Unit
MeaS
~...
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UtiL.
UKL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22,
sice
1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Wpe: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92
Method
SlCe ID Code Test Name Sample Date
. . .... ...~~.... .~......._.
WE1 G19-MW4 uM16 NAP 20 ~ jan-1992 LT
UM16 NB 20-jan-1992 NO
UM16 NDNPA 20-jan-1992
LT
UM16
UM16
"DPA
OXAT
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
ND
LT
UM16
UM16
PCP
PHANTR
20-jan-1992
2 0 -1 an- 19 92
ND
LT
UM16 PHENOL 20-;an-1992
ND
UM16
UM16
UM16
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Ian-1992
LT
LT
LT
m16 PRTHN 20-;an-1992
LT
UM16 PYR 20-jan-1992
LT
m33 lllTCE 20-ian-1992
UM33
uM3 3
UM33
m1 3
m33
uM33
UM3 3
UM33
UMI 3
uM3 3
uM33
UM3 3
uM3 3
UM33
uM33
UM33
UM3 3
UM3 3
uM3 3
UM33
uM33
m33
UM3 3
uM33
lJM33
LrM3 3
uM33
uM33
UM3 3
UM3 3
uM3 3
UM3 3
m33
m33
112TCE
1 IDCE
1 lDCLE
l2DCE
I2DCLB
12DCLE
l2DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13DM6
14DCL6
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
C2AVE
C2H3CL
C2H5CL
C6H6
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6115
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-?an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
(JFJ
to 22 -may-92
Page 32
Unit
va1lle MeaS
_____ ....
1.70et01 UGL
1.00e+01
4.50e+00
UGL
UGL
1.00e+01 UGL
9.10e+O0
5.00e+01
UGL
UGL
LT 4.10e+00 UGL
LT
LT
LT
LT
6.30e-01 UGL
1.42ei00 UGL
1.lOetOO UGL
1.10e+00 UCL
LT 9.70e+00 UCL
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
Nc
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
l.bOe+OO UGL
2.80et00 UCL
2.00e+00 UCL
9.20er00 UGL
CS2
ND
DBRCLM
LT
ETC6H5
LT
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNBK
20 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
No
ND
ND
1.00er01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
UGL
UGL
UCL

Mdi 22, 1992 Page 33
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installaclon: Jefferson Proving Ground IJF)
le Type: CGW sampling D ate Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Sire Type Site ID Code
WELL G19-MW4 uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
WELL G19-MW5 99
99
99
5803
SB03
SDZ 4
SO24
SD24
5024
SD24
5516
SS16
SSl6
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
5.516
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SSl6
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
5516
5516
TYl2
Test Name sample Date
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
2A46DT
NG
TETR
HG
HG
AG
AS
AS
PB
SE
AL
AL
BA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
cu
CU
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
MN
MN
NA
NA
NI
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
20-ian-1992
20 - jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
16 - j an- 19 92
16- jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-I992
16-jan-I992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - jan- I992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
Meas. Unit
QOOl. Value Meas
..._. ...__ ....
ND 5.00ec00 UGL
ND
LT
5.00e+00
4.70e+00
UGL
UGL
LT 5.00e-01 UGL
LT 5.00e-01 UGL
LT
LT
l.BZe+OO
5.09e-01
UGL
UGL
LT 7.19et00 UGL
1.25e+OO UGL
LT 5.66e-01 UGL
LT 3.16e-01 UGL
3.44er00 UCL
LT 3.09e+00 UGL
LT 4.74e+00 UGL
LT 4.lOr+OO UGL
1.15e+03 UGL
LT 8.15e+Ol UCL
3.40e+02 UCL
4.90eiOZ UGL
LT 5.00e+OU UCL

May 22, 1992
SiLe ?Lpe
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Vpe: CGW Sampling ~ a ~ange: ~ e 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
G19-MWS UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
UMI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Te5 t Name
. . 123TCB
124TCR
12DCLB
13DCLB
14DCLR
245TCP
246TCP
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
24DNT
26DNT
ZCLP
2CNAP
2MNAP
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
33DCBD
3NANIL
‘46DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
B2CEXM
B2CIPE
B2CLEE
B2EHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
RRFAN’T
BBHC
BRZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
RGHI PY
RKFANT
BZALC
Sample Date
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-;an-l992
16- jan- 1992
16 - jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-;an-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan- 1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-2an-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
Meas.
BOOl.
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
ND
NE
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
NE
ND
ND
ND
NE
ND
NE
ND
ND
ND
ND
NE
ND
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
NO
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
NO
ND
ND
LT
LT
NO
3.60er00
2.00ei00
1.00e+01
8.50e+00
4.40e+00
5, ooei01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
5.00e+01
5.50e+00
6,60e+00
1.00ei01
9.60e+00
1.00et01
6.00ei00
1 .ooe+01
1.40e+Ol
1. ooeto1
0.1oe+00
3.2OeiOl
1.40ei01
1.00e+01
2.3Oe+Ol
4.90e+00
1. ooe+o 1
6.00er00
5.00e+01
7.lOerOO
2.10e+01
1.00e+oi
Page 34
Unit
Meas
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UCL
UCL
UGL

May 22. 1992 Page 35
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Type: CGW sampling ~ a ~ange: ~ e 01-jan-92
(JFI
Lo 22-may-92
WELL
Method
Site ID Code
....~.. ....
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
mi6
UMI 6
UMl6
UM16
UM16
uM16
uMl6
uM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM3 3
UM33
UM33
Test Name
. . . . . . . . .
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMSO2
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFm
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
ESFS04
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHANTR
PHENOL
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
UNK611
UNK626
ll1TCE
112TCE
l1DCE
Meas.
Sample Dace Bool.
.......~__. .....
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-I992
16- jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16 - j an-19 92
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16- jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-;an-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-I992
!6-jan-l992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-I992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
16-jan-1992
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
NO
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Unit
Value Meas
_.... ....
1.50er01 UGL
8.30er00 UGL
1.00e+01 UGL
5.10ei00 UGL
3.00er01 UGL
5.90e+00 UGL
6.80ei00 UGL
3.80ei01 UGL
7.50e+00 UGL
6.40e+00 UGL
1.00e+Ol UGL
l.OOe+Ol UGL
?.70e+00 UGL
1.10ei01 UGL
1.00ei01 UGL
1.00e+01 UGL
l.5Oe+01 UGL
6.60et00 UGL
6.00ei00 UGL
6.00e+00 UGL
2.00e+01 UGL
1.00er01 UGL
1.80e+01 UGL
6.20e+00 UGL
7.20erOO UGL
7.20e+OO UGL
1.00ei01 UGL
i.BOe+OO UGL
3.00e+01 UGL
1.30e+00 UGL
1.70e+01 UGL
1.00e+01 UGL
4.50e+00 UGL
1.00erOl UGL
6.lOe+OO UGL
5.00er01 UGL
2.20ei01 UGL
1.00e+01 UGL
9.70et00 UGL
9.30e+00 UGL
7.30ei00 UGL
4.70er00 UGL
1.70er01 UGL
2.OOe+Ol UGL
9.00ei00 UGL
4.10e+00 UGL
6.30e-01 UGL
1.42e+00 UGL

Ma: , 2 2. 1992
Site ?ype
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: ~efferson Proving Ground
File Type: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code T~SC Name Sample Date
~~..... .... .......~~ ...........
G19-MW5 uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
C19-MW7
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM33
m33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM33
m33
m3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
llDCLE 16-jan-1992
12DCE 16-jan-1992
l2DCLB 16-ian-1992
IZDCLE 16-jan-1992
12DCLP
??"MU
16-Jan-1992
16-ian-1992
(JFi
LO 22 -map92
Meas,
0001.
Value
LT 1.10e+00
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
13DCLB ;6-;an-1992 LT
13DCP 16-;an-1992
13DMB 16-jan-1992
14DCLB 16-jan-1992
2CLEVE 16-jan-1992
ACET 16-Ian-1992
BRDCLM 16-:an-1992
C13DCP 16-jan-1992
C2AVE
C2H3CL
CZHSCL C2H5CL
C6H6 16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16 - j an- 19 92
16 - -jan-1992 jan-1992
16-;an-1992
16 - jan-1992
CCL4 16-jan-1992
CH2CLZ CH3BR 16-jan-1992
16-ian-1992
16-jan-1992
CH3CL 16-jan-1992
CHBR3 16-jan-1992
CHCL3 16-3.3"-1992
16-jan-1992
CLC6H5 16-jan-1992
cs2 16-jan-1992
DBRCLM 16-jan-1992
ETC6H5 16-jan-1992
MEC6H5 16-jan-1992
MEK 16-ian-1992
MIBK 16-:an-1992
MNBK 16-jan-1992
STYR 16-jan-1992
T13DCP 16-jan-1992
TCLEA 16-jan-1992
TCLEE 16-jan-1992
TRCLE 16-jan-1992
99 2A46DT 15-jan-1992
99
NG 15-jan-1992
99 TETR 15-jan-1992
5803 HC 15-jan-1992
SB03 HC 15-jan-1992
SD24 AG 15-jan-1992
SD24 AS 15-jan-1992
SD24 PB 15-jan-1992
SD24 SE 15-jan-1992
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
NE
NE
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
1,10e+00
9.70ei00
7.60er00
2.80e+00
5.00er00
9.20e+00
3.80e+00
5.0Oe+00
8.10ei00
8.20ei01
6.00etOO
7.90ei00
5.00ei00
1.00ei01
5.00e-01
2.12e+00
2.40e+00
3.70e+00
4.02er00
5. OOeiOO
1.60ei00
8.20ei00
8.30~-01
1.40er00
5.00er00
6.50er00
9.30er00
8.70e+00
1.00et01
1.00e+01
1. ooei01
5.00ei00
5.00ei00
4.70e+00
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
1.82e+00
5.09e-01
7.19et00
3.16et00
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.10ei00
P 'age 36
unic
Meas
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UCL
UCL
UCL
UCL
UGL
uc L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL

Ha" 22. 1992 Page 37
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installacion: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Wpe: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
MeChod
Site Type Site ID Code
.~~~~~~~~ ....... ....
WELL G19-MW7
Meas.
Test Name Sample Date 8001. Val"'?
....~.... ~.~....~.~.
SS16 AL 15-jan-1992 LT 8.15et01 UGL
SS16 BA 15- Jan-1992
2,10e+02 UGL
5516 BA 15-jan-1992
2.20e+02 UGL
5516 BE 15-jan-1992 LT 3.41e-01 UGL
5516 CA 15-jan-1992
8.60e+04 UGL
SS16 CA 15- jan-1992
9.20e+04 UGL
SS16 CD 15- Jan-1992 LT 2.67ei00 UG L
SS16 co 15-jan-1992 LT 2.50ei01 UGL
SS16 CR 15-Jan-1992
9.40e+00 UGL
SS16 CR 15-jan-1992
9.99er00 UGL
SS16 CU 15 - j an-1 9 92
7.01e+00 UGL
SS16 CU 15-,an-1992
7.19eiOO UGL
SS16 FE 15 - jan-1992
9.90ei01 UGL
SS16 FE 15-jan-1992
4.26e+02 UGL
SS16 K 15 - j an-1 992
1.08er03 UGL
5516 K 15 - j an- 19 92
1.19ei03 UG L
SS16 MG 15-jan-1992
3.20et04 UGL
SS16 MG 15-jan-1992
3.40e+04 UGL
SS16 MN 15-ian-1992
5.59ei01 UGL
SS16 m 15-?an-1992 2.OBei02 UGL
5516 NA 15-jan-1992 2.30e+04 UGL
SS16 NA 15-jan-1992 2.40e-04 UCL
$516 NT 15-ian-1992 LT 8.76e+00 UGL
SS16 TL 15-jan-1992 LT 1.14ei02 UGI.
SS16 V 15-jan-I992 LT 4.00e+o0 UGL
5516 ZN 15-jan-1992 LT 1.94e+01 UGL
TY12 CYN 15- jan- 1992 LT 5.00ei00 UGL
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
13DCLB
I4DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-Ian-1992
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
3.60er00
2.80e+00
1.0oe+01
8.50e+OO
4.40e+00
5.00et01
1.00ei01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
2 4 DNT
26DNT
ZCLP
2CNAP
2MNAP
ZMP
ZNANIL
2NP
33DCBD
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-ian-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
ND
m
ND
1.00ei01
1.00er01
5.00e+01
5.50ei00
6.60e+00
1.00e+01
9.60et00
1.00et01
1. OOetOl 5.00er01
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
site m e
. . . . . . . . .
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground [JFI
File lyype: CGW sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . . . . . . ._..
319-MW7 UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UT16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Test Name
. . . 3NANIL
46DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDRN
AWSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
BZCEXM
B2CIPE
B2CLEE
BZEHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMS02
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
sample D ate
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-Jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-Ian-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-ian-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-ian-1992
i5-;an-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-ian-1992
;5-jan-i992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-;an-1992
Meas.
mol.
.....
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NE
No
ND
ND
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
rr
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
NE
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
NE
LT
LT
NE
NE
LT
LT
NO
value
5.00e+01
5.00et01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
1, ooe+01
1.00et01
5.00e+01
5.0Oe+01
6.80e+00
3 .ooe+01
3,00e+01
1.20e+01
1.40ei01
1.90ei01
2.00e+01
1.00er01
1.00er01
8.lOelOO
3.20e+01
1.40et01
1.00ei01
2.30e+01
4.90et00
1.00e+01
6.00ei00
5.00e+01
7,10e+00
2.lOei01
1.00ei01
1.50e+01
8.30er00
1.00et01
5. lOeiOO
3,00e+01
5,90e+00
6.80et00
3 .8Oe+Ol
7.50e+00
6.40ei00
1.00e+01
1.00ei01
7.70e+00
1.10er01
1.00e+oi
1.00ei01
1.50e+01
6.60e+00
6.00e+00
Page 38
Unit
Meas
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UG L

May 22 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File Vpe: CGW Sampllng Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . . . . . . ....
G19-MW7 UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM3 3
UM13
UM33
UM3 3
un33
UM33
UM33
UM33
uM3 3
UM3 3
u ~ 3 3
m3 3
UM3 3
UM, 3
UM33
UM3 3
un33
UM3 3
UM3 3
F 3 3
W33
UM3 3
Test Name
. .
ESFS04
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NRP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHAtiTR
PHENOL
PHTHL
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
UNK547
lllTCE
112TCE
llDCE
llDCLE
12DCE
l2DCLB
l2DCLE
12DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13DMB
14DCLB
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
C2RVE
C2H3CL
C2HSCL
C6H6
CCL4
Sample Date
_..........
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-Jan-1992
15-Ian-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-Jan-1992
15-Jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15 - jan- 1992
15-jan-1992
15-;an-1992
15-ian-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-;an-1992
15-;an-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-;an-1992
15-jan-1992
15-ian-1992
15-;an-1992
15-;an-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15- jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-;an-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
neas.
Bool.
.....
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
No
LT
LT
No
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
No
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ValUe _____
6.00e+OO
2.00e+01
1.00ei01
1.80e+01
6.20er00
7.20e+00
7.20e+00
1.00e+01
5.80e+00
3.00ei01
7.30e+00
1.70e+01
1.00et01
4 .50e+00
1.0oe+01
9.10et00
5.00e+01
2,20e+0 I
I .ooe+01
5.00e+00
9.70eiOO
9.30ei00
7.30e+00
4.70e+00
1.70e+01
1.00e+01
4,10e+00
6.30e-01
1.42e+00
1. lOetOO
1. lOerO0
9.70er00
7.60e+00
2.80er00
5.00e+00
9.20e+00
3.80er00
5.00e+00
8,10e+00
8.2oeiOl
1, OOeiOl
7.90e+O0
5.oOer00
1.00er01
5.00e-01
2,lZeiOO
2.40et 00
3.70er00
Page 39
unit
Meas
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
llGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
Site m e
~-~ .....
WELL
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installacion: Jefferson Proving Ground (JF)
File wpe: CGW sampling ate Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
. . . . . . . ....
uM3 3
G19-MW83-I 99
99
99
99
SB03
5803
SD24
SD24
SO24
SD24
SSI6
5516
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
SSi6
SS16
5.916
SS16
5516
Test Name Sample Date
...~... . . . -. . CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
CSZ
DBRCW
EW6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
rnBX
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
2A46DT
NG
NQ
TETR
HG
HG
AG
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BE
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
cu
FE
FU
K
K
MG
MN
MN
NA
15-jan-1992
15-Jan-1992
15-Ian-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15 - jan-1992
15-ian-1992
15-;an-1992
15-%an-1992
15 - jan-1992
15-ian-1992
15-;an-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-I992
15-jan-1992
15-jan-1992
2 0- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-ian-1992
20-:an-1995
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-Ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
BOOl.
.....
M)
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
LT
m
ND
ND
ND
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
Page 40
Unit
Value MeaS
...._ ....
4.31e+00 UGL
5.00ei00 UGL
1.6OeiOO UGL
8.20e+00 UGL
8.3Oe-01 UGL
1.40e+00 UGL
5.00ei00 UGL
6.50et00 UGL
9.30e+00 UGL
8.70e+00 UGL
1.oOerOl UCL
1.00er01 UGL
1.0oeio1 UGL
5.00et00 UGL
5.00et00 UCL
4.70e+00 UGL
5.ooe-01 UGL
5.00e-01 UGL
1.82et00 UGL
5.09e-01 UGL
1.87e+Ol UGL
?.19e+00 UGL
1.34er00 UGL
5.66e-01 UGL
3.16e-01 UGL
3.09e+00 UGL
G.74et00 UGL
4.10ei00 UGL
8.15e+01 UGL
2.10er02 UGL
3.41e-01 UGL
1.00e+05 UGL
2.67ei00 UGL
2.50e+01 UGL
6.02er00 UGL
7.56er00 UGL
4.29ei00 UGL
9.84eiOl UGL
4.48er02 UGL
3.94er02 UGL
5.16e+02 UGL
3.70e+04 UGL
1.84erOl UCL
2.54er01 UGL
2.90er04 UGL

May 22. 1992
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
~ile wpe: CGW sampling Date Range: 01-Jan-92
Method
Site ID Code
.. ....
SS16
SS16
TY12
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UN16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UN16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UN16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI 6
UM16
UMI6
UM16
Test Name Sample Date
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
13DCLB
14DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
24DNT
2 6DNT
2CLP
2CNAP
2MNAP
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
33DCBD
3NANIL
46DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
RNTRC
B2CEXM
BZCIPE
B2CLEE
B2EHP
BAANTR
2 0 - j an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
2 0 -j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20 - jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-I992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
IJFI
to 22-may-92
Meas.
0001.
.....
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
Value
.....
3.00ei04
8.76er00
5.12e+Ol
1.10er03
4.00et00
1.94e+01
5.00e+00
3.60erOO
2 .80e+00
1.00e+01
8.50e+00
4.40er00
5.00e+01
1.00et01
1.00e+01
1.0oe+01
5.00er01
5.50e+00
6.60e+00
1.0oe+ol
9.60ei00
1.00e+01
1.00er01
5.00e+01
1.00e+01
6.00e+00
5.00et01
5.00er01
1.00e+01
1.00et01
1.00e+01
1. OOeiOl
1.00erol
5.00e+Ol
5 .OOe+01
6.80ei00
3.00e+Ol
3.00e+01
1.20e+oi
1,40e+0 1
1.90ei01
2.00e+01
1.00et01
1.00e+01
8.10er00
3.20ei01
1.40e+01
Page 41
Unic
MeaS
..__
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
uc L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
uc L
UG L
UGL
UGL

J 22. 1992
Site Type
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code Test Name Sample Dace
. . . .... ......... ....._.....
WELl G19-MW83-I UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZRLC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMSOZ
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an-1 992
20-Jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
2 0 - jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
(JFl
to 22 -rnay-92
MeaS.
Bool.
..._.
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
ND
Value
1.00er01
2.30ei01
4 .90e+00
i.ioi+oo
2.10e+01
1.00e+01
1.50et01
8.30e+00
1.00er01
Page 42
Unit
MeaS
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
LT 5.10e+00 UGL
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRNK
ESFS04
FAINT .
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
"YAT
PCP
PHANTR
PHENOL
PPDDD
PPDDE
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
NO
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
MD
LT
ND
LT
No
LT
ND
LT
LT
3.00e+01
5.90e+00
6.80e+00
3. BOe+Ol
7.50e+00
6.40ei00
1.ooer01
1. OOerOl
7.70e+00
1.10et01
1.00erOl
1.00e+oi
1.50ei01
6.60er00
6.00e+00
6.00e+00
7.20e+00
1.00e+01
5.80ei00
3.00e+01
i .3oe+oo
1.70e+01
1.00e+01
4.50e+00
1 .ooe+01
9,10e+00
5.00e+01
2.20e+01
1.00e+01
9.70er00
9.30er00
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1992 Paae 43
CHEMICAL REPORT
installation: Jefferson Proving Ground iJFl
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 KO 22-may-92
Method Meas, Unit
SlLe rrpe Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date Bool. Value Meas
...... .~~~~.. .... ......... ......_.__. ._... ..... ....
WELL G19-MW83-1 uM16 PPDDT 20-jan-1992 LT 7.30e+00 UGL
UM16 PRTHN 20-jan-1992 LT 4.70e+00 UGL
UM16 PYR 20-jan-1992 LT 1.70e+01 UGL
UM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
m33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
m33
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM33
UM33
uM3 3
m3 3
m33
uM33
uM33
m3 3
uM33
lllTCE
ll2TCE
llDCE
llDCLE
12DCE
12DCLB
l2DCLE
12DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13DMB
14DCLB
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
C13OCP
C2AVE
C2H3CL
C2HSCL
ChHh
CCL4
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLChH5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNBK
STIR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
tic
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
NLl
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
No
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
NLl
ND
LT
LT
4.10e+00
6.30e-01
1.42e+00
1.10e+o0
1.10ei00
9.70e+00
7.60e+00
2. eoe+00
2.00e+00
9.20er00
3.80e+00
5.00e+00
8. lortoo
8.20e+ol
1.00e+01
7.90e+00
5.00e+00
1.00e+01
5.OOe-01
2.12eioo
2.40e+00
3.70e+00
3.92ei00
1.00e+01
1.60e+00
t3.20e+00
8.30e-01
1.40e+00
5.00ei00
6.50ei00
9.3Oe+00
8.70et00
1.00ei01
1.00ei01
1.00ei01
5.00e+00
5.00e+00
4,70e+00
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
WELL ci9-~we3-2 99 2A46DT 2 0- jan-1992 LT 1.82t?+00 UGL
99 NG 20-jan-1992 LT 5.09e-01 UCL
99 NQ 20-jan-1992 LT 1.87e+01 UGL
99 TETR 20-jan-1992 LT 7.19ei00 UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL

May 22, 1992
Site Type
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
File Type: CCW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92
Method
Site ID Code
WELL G19-W83-2 SBU3
SD24
SO24
SD24
SD2 4
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SSi6
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
5516
TY12
lM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
LW16
UM16
UM16
UM16
mi6
uMl6
Test Name Sample Date
~.....~ ..
HG
AC
AS
PB
SE
AL
EA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
co
CR
CR
CU
cu
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
MN
rn
NA
NA
NI
SB
TL
TL
V
ZN
CYN
123TCB
124TCB
IZDCLB
13DCLB
14DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
Z~OCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
24DNT
2 U - jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 ~ jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2U-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-ian-1992
2 0-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LJFi
to 22-may-92
Meas.
0001. Value
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
LT
5.66e-01
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74e+00
4.10e+00
8,15e+01
5.30e+01
9.60ei01
3.41e-01
5.20e+04
7.10er04
2.67er00
2.50e+01
6.92e+00
4.47e+00
5.40e+00
4 .29et00
1.48er02
2.4 6e+0 1
3.00ei02
3.94e+02
1.30e+04
1.80e+04
1.01e+01
1.05etOl
1.60er04
2.10ei04
8.76e+OO
5.12ei01
1.10er03
1.10e+04
4.00er00
1.94e+Oi
5.00ei00
3.60e+OO
2 .eoe+00
1.00e+01
8.50ei00
4.40ei00
5.00e+01
I.OOe+Ol
1.00e+Oi
I .liOetOl
5.00e+01
5.50et00
Page 44
Unit
MeaS
.~..
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
VGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
uc L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UC L
UGL
UGL
IIG L
UGI.
u(: L

May 22, 1992
Site Type
WELL
CHEMICRL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File Type: CGW Sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
site ID Code
....
G19-MWK3-2 W16
UM16
UMll
UMll
UM16
UM16
WMl6
W16
WM16
UM16
WM16
W16
UM16
UM16
UM16
WM16
UMl6
W16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
M16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
M16
UMI6
W16
UM16
MI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMI6
UM16
UM16
WM16
UM16
UMl6
UM16
UM16
UM16
uMI6
UM16
UM16~
Test Name Sample Date
~..~...~.
2 6DNT
2CLP
2CNAP
ZMNAP
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
33DCBD
3NANIL
46DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AENSLF
ALDRN
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
B2CEXN
B2CIPE
B2CLEE
B2EHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL68Z
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMS02
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-?an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 ~ 3 an ~ 19 9 2
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
8001.
.....
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NE
ND
ND
NE
ND
ND
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
NE
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
m
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
NO
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
Value
.....
6.60ei00
1. ooe+01
9.60e+00
1.00rt01
1.00ei01
5.0Oei01
1. OOeiOl
6.00e+00
5.00e+Ol
5.00et01
1.00e+01
1 .ooe+01
1.00ei01
1.00ei01
1.00e+01
5.00e+01
5.00ei01
6. BOerOO
3 .OOe+01
3.00er01
1.20ei01
1.40e+01
1.90e+01
2.00e+01
1.00er01
1.00et01
8.10et00
3.20e+01
1.40e+01
1.00e+01
2.30ei01
4.90e+00
1.00e+o1
6.00e+00
5.00e+01
7.10e+00
2,lOetOl
I .00etoi
l.S0'2*0l
K.30r*UO
I. ooe+u 1
5. IOetOO
3.00e*01
5.90ei00
6,80e+00
3.80e+01
7.50e+00
6.40eiOO
1.00ei01
Page 45
Unit
Meas
....
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UCL
UG L
uc L
UtiL
UCL
UGL
Ut;L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L

May 22, 1992
Mechod
Site Type sice ID Code
...~ ~... ~~~.... ....
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
lnseallatlon: Jefferson Proving Ground lJFl
File rype: CGW sampling ate Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
MI6
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
UM16
uM16
uM16
uM3 3
uM33
UM33
UM33
UM33
UM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
UM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
Test Name
. - . DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDm
EMlRNK
ESFS04
FANT
FLRWE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHANTR
PHENOL
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
IllTCE
ll2TCE
llDCE
1 lDCLE
l2DCE
12DCLB
l2DCLE
12DCLP
12DMB
13DCLB
13DCP
13DMB
14DCLB
2CLEVE
ACET
BRDCLM
sample Date
20- jan-1992
20-Ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-?an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- j an-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
50-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
2 0- jan- 1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
50-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
0001.
.....
ND
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
NE
NE
LT
NE
LT
LT
LT
LT
No
LT
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
ND
LT
No
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
ND
LT
Value
1.00e+o1
7.70e+00
1.10et01
1.00e+01
1.00er01
1.50e+01
6.60e+00
6.00e+00
6.00ei00
2.00e+01
1.00et01
1. eOe+01
6.20e+00
7.20e+00
7.20e+00
1.00e+01
S.~O~+OO
3.00e+01
7.30e+00
1.70ei01
1. OOeiOl 4.50ei00
1.00e+01
9. lOerOO
5.00e+01
2.20e+01
1.00e+01
9.70e+00
9.30e+00
7.10e+00
4.70ei00
1.70ei01
4.lOecOO
6.30e-01
1.42e+00
1,10e+00
1.10e+00
9.70e+00
7.60ei00
2.80et00
2.00e+00
9.20e+00
3.80e+00
5.00e+00
8. lOerOO
e.20e+01
1.00e+01
7.90er00
Page 46
Unit
Meas
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGI.
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL

May 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Instal lac ion: Jeff erSm Proving Ground IJF)
~ l l e vpe: ccw sampling nace ~ange: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method Meas.
Site Type Site ID Code Test Name Sample Date BOOl. Value
WELL
MIELL
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 7
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
u ~ 3 i
uM33
619-MW9 99
99
99
99
5803
SO24
SO24
SD24
5024
5516
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
SS16
SS16
SS16
C13DCP
C2 AVE
C2H3CL
C2HSCL
C6H6
CCL4
CHZCL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCL3
CLC6H5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MNBK
STYR
T13DCP
TCLEA
TCLEE
TRCLE
2A46DT
NG
NQ
TETR
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
10-ian-1992
20-;an- 1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jen-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
ND
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
Nc
ND
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
1.T
5.00e+00
1.00e+01
5.00e-01
2.12e+00
2.40e+00
3.70e+00
3.92e+00
1.00e+01
1.60ec00
8.20e+00
8.3Oe-01
1.40e+00
5.00e+00
6.50e+00
9.30e+00
8.7Oei00
1.0oei01
1.00ei01
1.00e+01
5.00er00
5.00ei00
4.70e+00
5.00e-01
5.00e-01
1.82er00
5.09e-01
1.87e+01
7.19e*00
HG LT 5.66e-01
AG
AS
PB
SE
AL
BA
BA
BE
CA
CA
CD
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
co
SS16 CR
CR
CU
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
SS16
SSl6
SS16
LT
LT
LT
3.16e-01
3.09e+00
4.74ei00
Page 47
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UCL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
LT 4.1oe+oo UGL
LT 8.15e+01
1,90e+02
2.50e+02
UGL
UGL
UGL
LT 3.41e-01 UGL
LT
LT
cu LT
9.70ei04
l.ZOe+OS
2.67ei00
2.50e+01
8,17e+00
8.79e+00
8.76ei00
4.29eiOO
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL

May 22, 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground
~ile Type: CGW Sampling ate ~ange: 01-jan-92
Method
sice Type Site ID Code
WELL C19-MW9 5516
SS16
SS16
5516
5516
5516
SS16
5516
5516
5516
SS16
5516
SS16
5516
TY12
UM16
uM16
uM16
W16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
UM16
W16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
rest Name sample Date
..
FE
FE
K
K
MG
MG
hN
MN
NA
NI
SB
TL
V
ZN
CYN
123TCB
124TCB
12DCLB
I3DCLB
14DCLB
245TCP
246TCP
24DCLP
24DMPN
24DNP
2 4 DNT
26DNT
ZCLP
2CNAP
ZMNAP
2MP
2NANIL
2NP
33DCBD
3NANIL
46DN2C
4BRPPE
4CANIL
4CL3C
4CLPPE
4MP
4NANIL
4NP
ABHC
ACLDAN
AENSLF
ALDRN
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an-19 92
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
2 0 ~ j an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an- 19 92
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
(JFi
to 22-may-92
Meas
BOO1
.... .
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
ND
NE
NE
ND
ND
ND
NE
ND
NE
ND
NE
NE
ND
LT
NE
ND
LT
8.38e+01
3.22er02
6.17e+02
7.98e+02
3.40e+04
3.50e+04
6.92e+01
2.09e+02
2.90e+04
8.76e+00
5.12ec01
1.10ei03
4.00e+00
1.94e+01
5.00er00
3.60e+00
2.80e+OO
1.00e+oi
8.50e+00
4.40ei00
5.00e+01
I, ooe+ 0 1
1.00e+01
I. ooe+o 1
5.00ei01
5.5OeiOO
6.60e+00
1.00e+01
9.60e+00
1.00ei01
1. OOeiOl
5.00e+01
1.00et01
6.00e+00
5.00ei01
5.00ei01
1.00ei01
1.00e+Ol
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
1.00e+01
5,00e+Ol
5.00e+01
6.80e+00
3.00ei01
3.0Oe+01
1.20er01
Page 48
Unit
MeaS
_.__
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
uc L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL

May 22, 1992
site rVpe
.~~ -.....
WELL
CHEMICAL REPORT
Installation: Jefferson Proving Ground (JFI
File wpe: CGW sampling Date Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Method
Site ID Code
~._.... ....
c19-Mw9 UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UMl6
UMl6
UM16
uM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
UM16
Test Name
ANAPNE
ANAPYL
ANTRC
B2CEXM
B2CIPE
B2CLEE
BZEHP
BAANTR
BAPYR
BBFANT
BBHC
BBZP
BENSLF
BENZOA
BGHIPY
BKFANT
BZALC
CHRY
CL6BZ
CL6CP
CL6ET
CLDAN
CPMS
CPMSO
CPMSOZ
DBAHA
DBHC
DBZFUR
DEP
DITH
DLDRN
DMP
DNBP
DNOP
ENDRN
ENDRNK
ESFSO4
FANT
FLRENE
HCBD
HPCL
HPCLE
ICDPYR
ISOPHR
LIN
MEXCLR
MLTHN
NAP
NB
Meas.
unit
Sample Date BOO1 . Value MeaS
...______.. __.__ --__. ..__
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20 - jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20- jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
~“ ~
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-ja”-l992
20-jan-1992
20-ian-1992
20-;an-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
No
ND
LT
LT
NO
LT
LT
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
ND
LT
LT
ND
NE
LT
LT
Nc
ND
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
NO
LT
LT
ND
1,40e+01
1,90e+01
2.00et01
1.00er01
1 .OOP+Ol
8.10e+00
3.20er01
1,40e+01
1.0Oer01
2.30er01
4.90e+00
1.00e+01
6.00e+00
5.00e+01
7.10e+00
2.10e+01
l.OOer01
1.50er01
8.30er00
1.00ei01
5. IOeiOO
3.00ei01
5.90ei00
6.80ei00
3.80et01
7.50e+00
6.40e+00
1.00er01
1. ooer01
7.70e+00
1.10e+01
1.00e+01
1.ooe+01
1.50e+01
6.60e+00
6.00e+00
6.00e+00
2.00e+01
1.00er01
1,80e+01
6.20e+00
7.20e+OO
7.20e+00
1.00e+01
5.8Oe+00
3.0Oe+01
7.30et00
I .70e+01
1.00e+O1
Page 49
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL

May 22. 1992
CHEMICAL REPORT
Inscallaclan: Jefferson Proving Ground IJFJ
File Vpe: CGW Sampling Dace Range: 01-jan-92 to 22-may-92
Site ID
WELL Gl9-MW9
Method
Code
____
UM16
UM16
uM16
uN16
uM16
uN16
UM16
UM16
UM16
uM16
uMl6
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM33
uM31
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
UM3 3
uM3 3
uM3 3
UM3 3
uM3 3
m3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
m33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
UM3 3
uM3 3
uM33
uM33
uM3 3
uM3 3
Test Name Sample Date
NDNPA
NNDPA
OXAT
PCP
PHANTR
PHENOL
PPDDD
PPDDE
PPDDT
PRTHN
PYR
11 lTCE
ll2TCE
IlDCE
I lDCLE
IZDCE
12DCLB
IZDCLE
12DCLP
IZDMB
13DCLB
1JDCP
13DMB
14DCLB
ZCLEVE
ACET
ACET
BRDCLM
C13DCP
C2AVE
C2H3CL
CZHSCL
C6H6
CCL4
CHZCLZ
CH2CL2
CH3BR
CH3CL
CHBR3
CHCLJ
CLC6H5
cs2
DBRCLM
ETC6H5
MEC6H5
MEK
MIBK
MNBK
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-Jan-1992
20-jan-1992
20-jan-1992
2 0 - j an-1 992
2 0- j an-1 9 92
20-ian-1992
20 -jan-1992
20-jan-1992
Meas.
BOOl. value
LT
ND
LT
NE
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
NE
LT
LT
ND
LT
Nc
No
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
LT
ND
LT
LT
LT
NO
NO
ND
4.50e+00
1.00e+01
9.10e+00
5.00e+01
2.20e+01
1.00e+01
9.70ei00
9.30e+00
7.30et00
4.70e+00
1,70e+0 1
4.10ei00
6. Joe-01
1.42e+00
1.10e+00
1. lOetOO
9.70e+00
7.60et00
2.80et00
2.00e+00
9.20er00
3.80ei00
5.00ei00
8.10e+00
8.20er01
5.2Oe+00
1.00er01
7.90er00
5.00ei00
1.00ei01
5.0Oe-01
2.12e+n0
2.40eiOO
3.70e+00
3.63ei00
3.73ei00
1.00e+01
1.60ei00
8.20e+00
8.30e-01
1.40eiOO
5.ooe+no
6.50e+00
9.3oe+no
8.70e+00
I .00e*01
i.noe*01
I. OOe+O I
Page 50
unit
MeaS
..__
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UG L
UCL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UGL
UG L
UGL
uc.: L.
UCL
UGL

u
!? IDOOO~*DU) l~ooorllol~l~l~l~
bawmw mwoOorloo~OoOoOOOOOOOmOooooo
w IDNQOW~IO U)~~O~PU)\OU)IDUI N O U ) ~ m ~ o o ~ ~ o o ~ ~ o o ~ w o o r l m o o U
2 m 4
m 3 mmor(mmm ....... ........ . m ~ m m m m m m ~ yq;; m m........................... m r n o ~ m ~ w ~ n m - - r n m ~ ~ m r l m m m ~ m
," 2> am o ~ m m o o o ONNNOOOOOO 0000 o o rlrl ~ m orlrl o ~ mm m ~ ~ mm w m ~ mm ~ m m~ u ~ r m l m
<
4:
n
4
>
0000000 0000000000 0000 oLnooooooooooooooooooooooooo
5
W 0000000 0000000000 OOmm OWOOO~OOOmOOO~OOOOOOOQOOOQO
iL L1 5 ooooy~y .... ooooyyyyyo ....
o-mm ~ m m m o m m m o ~ m m o r l ~ ~ ~ ~ m m o m m
. .... ............................
c v a 1 O N ~ ~ O O O N ~ ~ O O O O O0000 O o o drl m m o4-4 o m m mm o r l muu m o ~ uu m m ~ w~ u r l - m + o ~ ~
3
u1
0
z
a
E
U 0
u w
r( 22
0"
000
0 nbb
clcl
r l . + ~ ~ m m
00001 I
I I I I&@
E2E wmmmmWW w w w w w

a)
C m
n:
m
n
0)
mA m 7
27 ~m
orlwoomdoo o ~ - o o o - + m o o w mmooorlooeooooooooooomooooooo~ooodmoomoeoo
~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ o o d m ~ o m o o o ~ r l o o ~ m o o m
OmNmqr(Ne.LD ......... m........... m N P - N , m e. P ~ N.. q ~ l .. ~ q ...... ~ m ~ o m q. m......... - ~ m p o ~ ~ o ~
u o r mm l m m 4-1 o o ~ o~ orlrl m m.+rt o o mm ~ w mu ~ ~ om ~ m QU ~ ~ mm m ~ u-f ~ ~ ~ 4.1 u o ~ ~ ~ ~
m
D'
5
0
0
z
a

i
0
0
m
m
u
m
0
m
0000000000000000000000
wowowwwwwwwwoowwwo~oo~
m 0000000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0
0000000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0
s 0000000000000000000000
.A ...................... 99999999 99999999 9Y9999999 9
a oooooooooooooooooooooo oy~vllnoooo 0mmm0000 0~000000 0
m
3rl rlrl CIm
01
cl
Lr
a
e:
cl
a
2
m
rl
a
a

0
c-
t: rn
a o m m o o o o ooc1moooooo o mdd m y l o o o o o o ommmoooooo rld o~oooooooo
m m
3
A
a
d d d
X
cl
h
2

0
W
& L4
m
0 mrloo w r l ~ w om00 ooooo m m r - ~ orloo moo00 nPmw ooooo moo
C m -+warn mPmm wrlmw ~ O O O P wrlrlw mmom duoom wmrlm mmoom -NO
107 m ~ m m OONN mmrlm ~ ~ m r l m
a .... .... .... .... .. . . . . . . . . . . .
m m oorlrl 0000 doow Q O ~ ~ 0000 Q rlomw orlm-10 rim 0000 Q ~ QQ O N Q orlw rl
2 Z>
rlwm
m
0
C
.*
C vl
0
lo
i
rn
o n
E
01
s
U
A d
2
0
W
q1r';r'; may? P~Q:P qqm.7 Q Q ~ V ) U P N ~
.i m r l a a a a a a U
cl
0
W
cl
a

I"
m : &
2 "
8888
iu
,> Om OdOO 00000000 000000000000 00000000 00000 QQOO 0
I: w orl WTNV w ~ o o m m o o w~oo~moooooo W N O O W ~ O O m ~ o o m CIP~P m
tL '* m > d me . . m. m . . ~ . r l rl~rrlmmmm . . . . . . . . ; ~ ........... m ~ ~ m r l ~ o orld~o;m?y o.. r l . . rlwmmrl . . . . . Q . . ~ . V ? rl
w m w o domw mwr-mmwmm PP rlrl m ~ m a m ~ mrlrlrlrlw~ - r ~ o r l mmerlnmamm w mm rlrl t-wmrl~ rlm oomm P
4rl
: r > rl
md
0
- -4
>
J
64
~i
-
2
v1
00 OdOO 00000000 000000000000 00000000 00000 0-00 0
00 OO(1d OdOOOPOO OQOOOPOOOOOO OQOOOPOO .... ........ ............ .. 00000 .... OmWO 0
o ~ d d o o m m o o ~ o ~ o m m o o ~ ~ moo~~eyyy m ~ ~ omww? ommm .... 0 .
mm 44
m a rlrl

,
~,
..
W
u1
d
m
z
rldrldcl dclrlclrlrl4 w w w w w w w w w clclclclclcl o w w w w w w w rlrl~rlrlclrl~rl
o w w o w u w w w w w w w w w w w u w w w u w w w w w u w w w w w w w w o w w o w w w "
33333 3333333 3233 33233 222323 3333 3333 333333333
cn 00000 0000000 m u 0 0 woooo 000000 wmoo WPOO 000000000

u ggg
&
U
10
Y
m o m
m ONO
m 7 mmm
m d . . .
m m orlo
E 2
000
m 000
2 000
.A . . . a 000
10
.
P
m r l
e l <
h
el
c
rl
000000
oooooo
hhhhhh
drlelrlelel
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mooorlmoo oooooooooorlmoooOOoooooo
mmt-rlorlPP o o o o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d m ~ ~ w o
w.?~yqqf? ~ o o o o m ~ m m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~
............. .........
o r l ~ m o o p . r~ l m ~ ~ o r l ~ m m o o o m m w w ~ d m o
h H
el 6.2
mwmoP drlm rnr-PNrl *
h
el
-p.mm (19.-
rl
h h
4 rl
h c
el
el
. . . . . . . .......................
00000000000000 orloooooo 00000000000000000000000
omooodmlnoooooo OPNdOPrlO 00000000000000000000000
O?OyONQdy?~?Oy ~ T OOOOOOOOOOOCmmOOOOOOOOO
~ ? ~
o m w w
4-
o ~ m ~ o o o o ooo o m m o r ( ~ oooooommmooomm~oooooomo
~ woo0 rl-m CCPP P
rimma om-
xx
zz
rld
rlrl~mmm
0 0 0 0 1 I
I I I I&&
m m m m a a
w w w w w w
d
d

0 m 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
............................................
Cr .4 a 0000000~~~00~ffl~00000000000000"0000000000000000000
3 -4m
0
z
L
Y o
1 o w
Y tlz
uu rlwu 4" mmm -4 rlmmo N ~ D W
4 rld
"

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
w o w u u w w o o w ~ o w ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w " " " " w
n
0 I : :
"0 a a a a a a a aww a a m w b. a00 a a a a a a
C H
m
W
C ISI 0000000000~~0000000000000000000000000000000000~~0
a12 m ~ oooooooooo~~oo~~oom~oooooooommoowwooooooooo
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ m o ~
a i ....................................... ............
w m m ~ m ~ m m ~ ~ m ~ o o o o ~ ~ m ~ m m o m ~ ~ o o ~ o mo mw m w o oCIO m m ~
m ~ ~ r ( u m m m m m 00 ~ ~ NN N N ~ N ~ O O
2
m
4-
00
L1 dm OP
c
NPlOO 00 -4
,id
rl IOW
".id mu)
PlPl NN

OOOOOOOOQOOOOOQOQ
: owoouooo owwoo u Qsssssssss
a
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooood~ooooooooooo
m ~ o o ~ ~ m m o o o o o o m m o o w a o o o o o oo o o o o o ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ m o
m 2 ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ w a ~ ~ ~ o m o mo ooo mo a ~ m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ a o ~ ow o o o
........................... .......................
m m ~ ~ m ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o a a w o o ~ m ~ m o ~ md o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ mmooed ~ m o o m m
X > NN ~ ~ m m m r l mm mm-0 4- mmmdm -AN
drmw d AmmP
.
u o
o w
r l z
n
m r l
c l 4
44
4dNN "LO -4 rl

.. z
m
0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2 mU m 4 I ~ oooooo~mooommooooooooooooooomo~ooooowoooooooooooooo
~ ............... ~ ~ o o o ~ ~ m r . n . . ~ . . ~ . . . ~ . . ma w ~ w. o. o....... o o o o o ~ m. o . . ~ . m . . ~ . o
2
0
c
am ~ m w m ~ ~ ~ r n
z> UNU.IDPN q u m
4 3 m
~ u u ~
u e m
m m e u u m ~ r n o ~ o o m m e m w ~ m o o o o o m
~ m ~ m m u m ~ m ~ rl-rwmomm m -
--~mommm--~mo +
r?mrldON NN m u rlrlmmmID rld" -4 d-rmrn-Nmm
w
?
4
3 > m 0000000000000000000000000000000000000~0000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
...................................................
:L u x .I 000000000000000000000000000000000000000~00000000000
c v)
a u ooooooorn~moom~moooooooooooooomooooooooooooooooooooa
mmmw *urn

0000000000~~0000000000000000000000000000000000~~0
m oooooooo~~~~oo~~oo~~mmoooooommoowwooooooo
blzl Q O Q N O O ~ ~ P ~ ~ 0 0 0 I D W 0 0 O P N N ~ ~ O O O O ~ ~ O O P P N N O
m r l ....................................... ...........
m m ~ ~ m m w w ~ ~ ~ ( 1 0 0 m 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ o o o o w w w o o m
E> lnw*Q.yloomm mm NN ~ ~ m m r l r l ~ l m mmd- rldmm PP
4- Clcl r l r l r l - 4 YIYI 3- N(1
drl
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
m 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
-5 99999999999999999?9999???9????9????~99~99~999999999
a QQ00000000000000000000000~0000000000000000000000000
VI W W QWID
3-

,:_
.A
ol
€4- w
0 NN
0
z
a
E
*, m
:
uuuuu u

..
0)
I
cp
3
m
I
m
4 0
o u
. l a
N
k -
m
,u aaaauuaaaaaaaa aa as aaa a u a aa- a
a,
CI 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
.. ......
c 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
rng o o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~
m 4
m m d d o o ~ o d o o o o o o o w ~ o ~ ~ m o o o m ~ ~ o m ~ 0 o wm o ~ rl-m ~ o ~ 43 m ~ ~
z> rlrlmrl vILor(rl~rld-(y1y1 C)C).-ir(rlNrlrl Orlr(N rl Lo Nr(4
I
0
r
I
0
z
""NNNN NNNNNNN NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~~
mmmmmmmm mmmmmmm mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm mmmmmmm mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
rl4rlirldrlrl rlrlrlrlrlrlrl *drlddAd ~rl*-*-*-rl--rl---~rl---rlrl
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lllllll I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1
CccCcCec C C c C C c C ccccccc E C C c c C C C C C e C C c C c C c C C C c
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
-n-n.n-n.n.n-".r )-n-n-n-n-n.n-r I -n nn .n n -n-r 5 -n -n -n-n -n ." .n.nT. -r'.n.n -n -n -n-n .nT- .n TI .n r
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
00000000 0000000 0000000 0000000000000000000000
m m c1 m "I m m m mmmmmmm mmmmmmn mmmm"Immmmmmmmmmom~omm~

0
z

I:
i
> 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0 m 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
u .Y 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000~000~~
a -A ............................................. ...
c
0
m
v
ci
1
000000000000000000000000000000000~0000000~00000~000
P c

al
5 m 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0 00000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooo
a m64 2 o. . . . . o. . . o ~ ~ ~ 0 m ~ ~ ..... 0
m m o o m w r r ~ t n ~ r ~ o o ~ o m o ~ ~ m m ~ u ~ m ~ o w a u o o o o o ~ w o m o o o o
$ E> N-4- d 0 *du) rl W N r l 4 rlp. tnr(rl.iLn rl rlr(Ln4 InLnrldrlrld
d
'I
NNNNNNNNNNN
mmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmm
3-3Ad.+rl*d-I*
1 l I I I I I l I I I
E C C C C C C C C C C
m m m m m m d m m d m
.n -n .n Tvn .n .r
I I I I I I I I I I I
00000000000
mmmmm0mmmmm
I."._ ." -n
NNNNNNNNNNNNN
mmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmm
*dd4~*ddd*3-'4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
C C C C C C C C C C C C C
d d m d m a m m m m m m m
5 -n .n .n.n-n .n .n.n -n .n-n.n -n
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0000000000000
mnmmmmmmmmmnn
m
a mmmmmmmmmmmmammmmmmmmmmmammmmmmmmmmmmmmammmmmmmmmmmmm
2 auauaauaauuazuuaaaauuuauaua~aauauuuuuuuaauuuuauau~a
uvuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuvuuuuuuu
" awwwaaaaawaww~
W
a
wwwwwwwwwmwowwwmwwwwwwwwwawaawww~waw~

N
m
I
IT
2
a
3 cr, 00000000000000000000QOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooo
0 o~~uooowoowowwoowwoo woowoo wwwowow~oowoowoo~oooWoo
+ l e ,
a
IT 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
c 8 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2 103 o o m o o o o o o o o ~ o o o o m o q o o o ~ o o o m o ~ o m m o ~ u o o - ~ o o o o o w o o
m r l .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m m o o w o o ~ u m o o o m ~ u o m u o w o ~ ~ o ~ m o ~ o ~ w m ~ w o o o ~ ~ o o
2> u7u7 llPl333Nrlrl W 3 3 N 3 YI N-4 p1 r) ddc) 3rlrldDo N3.m
0
m
m
NNNNNNNNNNNN
mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmm
r4.-3.-7i33.-.-3~.-
1 1 l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
C C C C C C C C C C C C
m m m m d m m m m m m m
,-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n.
1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
000000000000
mmmmnnmmmnmn

a
H
lil
2
v1
n
v1
2

N
0
m
m
u NNNNNNNN
mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm
uI rlrlrlrlrldrld
%3%%3%%3
.A IIIIIIII
,x wwwwwwuIw
1 1 1 I I l I l
00000000
4 "NN""
n
NNNNNNN
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
rlrlrlrlrlrlrl
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
nnnnnnn
Q Q Q ~ Q Q P I
WWWWvIvIW
IIIIIII
0000000
NNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNN
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmm
rl----rlrlrl--rl-rl-rl--~rlrlrl- rlrlrlrlrlrlri
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnpapan~ .Q.QPPRPR
m m ~ o m o o Q m o m Q m Q m m w ~ m Q Q~ Qm Q~ Q Q Q
vIw~wwwwwwwwww4ww4vIw4w4 w44u(www
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIII
0000000000000000000000 0000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNN

N
0000000000000000000000
~ooooouooouuwvwoowuouu
IJI v aa a a a a a a a aaaaa a aaaaaaa
c
v)
' H
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
PI 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5 .
..................
a 00000000000000000~00000000000000~000000000000000000
t-
.
v1 P P

m
c oi
111 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0~0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
a mma 4
ooooooomooooooqo~oqo~m~~orlo~o~o~om~o~~oo~r-
.................. ........................
$ z>
m
0
m m rlrlr(rlr(y)~n o o o ~ ~ mmrlrlrl~rl- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ - 4 m ~ orl om o ~4-i m ~ rl u ~ m ~ ~ o w o r - ~ o ~ m o m
m rlrlm rl-rlrl-s rl
...................................................
0 > " ffl 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
a, G 4 oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~ooooo~oooo
r- I-
c v )
0
u1
k .
w
W
N

C'
.i
a
0
m

m
"

m qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq~9o~o~~9~~9oo~ooooooooooo9
000000000000000000000000000~00000000000000000000000
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I(
.A
m
.
. . .. ...........
a oooooooooo~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I-

9
m
I
m
i : 0000000000000000000Q000000~000000000000000000000000
0 LI ~ u w ~ o o u u w ~ o w o w ~ owwwow ~ o w w ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ v o o o o ~ o o o o o o w w o
N e .
N
0 2 ddd d d a xa xa x aa a a d a a a a
k u
m
-
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2 m 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
L. x 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
a -4 .....................................................
a oooooooooooooooooowoooooIooooooooooooooooo~oooooooooo
P- P
i: LI) P
0
"1
li
0'
0
z
a NN~NNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNNN~~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
E 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
_I m I l l I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I l l IIIII I I 1 I 1 IIIIII I I I 1 I Ill I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
;r v1 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ar..
41
"
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ~ w w w ~ w w w w w w w w w w ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w w ~

.. z
W
in 000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
5 Lu 000000000 OONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOO
ma ~mmmmmoorl ~ o r l r l o ~ m ~ ~ m m m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ o o
m
~ ~ m o ~ ~ ~ m
rl
rl
rl rlrld
; z> rlmrlmrlmrlmrl Pi
rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrl
mrl rl rl
rl
m
n

0000 OOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOO
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q s Q Q s Q s Q s s s Q ~ s Q s ~ w w ~ Q ~ w w wououwL?ooo w w ~ w
a a ulaa
.............................
14s a
!Xaaaa
..................
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
OOOOOOOO~NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOO~OOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
~ ~ ~ o o o o ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ m o ~ o ~ m
~ o o o m 0 ~ ~ u ~ - m ~ m ~ m m ~ ~ ~ m 0 ~ 0 ~ rl-4 m ~ ~ ~
0000
-4rl.- rl
- 4

0
z

P P
P
P
P
oooooppopoppppoopooooooopoooooooooooooooooooooooooo
N N
N
N
N
..... . . ...................................
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
nssws s s,d s s m s s
000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000
000000000000000000000~0000000000000000000
F.
<
H
r
W
u
r
o
0
li:
VI
:
a
z
0
e
m
m
rt
74
W
2
0
0
Y
Y
a
m .
VI
a
P'
x
m

..
U
v)
I
01
ma
ld4
am
x>
-.
0
0
m
W
u
m
n
m
-i
m
x
4
m
C
a:
n
0
.cm
U-0
m o
xu
W
1
-4
a
Lo
.
a
x
c
ti
0
m
2
z
CI
m
W
H
0
z
................................
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000~~000000000
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ o o o o
~ o oomomomomomooom~oomomoo~oomrlooOoOomoo o ~ m ~ o ~ o ~ o m o ~ o w o ~ o m m w m m ~ ~ o m m ~ rl 0 m m m ~ O m o
r( rl 4 4 rl 44- drld rl rldrldrl rldrldrlrlrl drl
a
. . . . . . . .

N
4'
0
z
0 . b
m
U
u m
ti O H
0 A >

a a a a a a
.. 2
'3
0 0000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000
5 0 O N 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OmN00000000000000000N0000
m 7 a ~
m 4 ......................... ~ - a ~ o ~ o w ~ m ~ ~ m ~ m r l .........................
~ w w~ r ol ~ or l o~ wo m o ~ ~ m o m r l o o m o o m ~ -
aim ~ ~ ~ m m m ~ ~ m ~ ~ m w m m m m- oa o o o ~ m ~ ~ o o~ o m ~ ~ ~ m m ~ m
: 2 > m r l
rl 0 4.i-
-a
m-
m
- 4
rl
r(

0
0
..
H
(0
6
m
z
111
mzi
6A
u m
&>
A
0
0
m
'3
u
d
D
u1 _..
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNN
0000000000000000000000000000000
mmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmm
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1

.. I;
a
0, 000000000000000000000 000000 0000000 0000 0000 0000
orlooOoO OQOO 0000 0000
m 000000000000000000000 0~0000
Y".??? 9199499 4 1Y1 9999 9999
am ~ ) m o ~ m o o o m m ~ o o ~ ~ lnmmrllnm - m n ~ ~ mmm~mlnm n ~ mmW0 0000 0000
2 2> rl rl 4rlrl
Pln
Qm
~ - m
rlrl
NOrlNNNrlrl rlrlrlrlrl.irlrl rlrl
rlrl
m
rlm-r~ dmmm
mI-t- mI-In
t'l
C
.i
Y
0
z
rlrl
rl
ON
a NNNNNNNNNNNNN nnnn gg
o o o ~ o o o o o o o o o m m m m m ~ m m O W
5 I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I &&
k v1 mmmmmmmmmmmmm
0
a a
Ql
rlww rlrl
00 rl
r l ~ m
00 I
ALL%
www
U
H
V Y
O H
O m N t: N
0 rl>
N
,-
m
O D
.A
E z d
m
s
U
d
bb
5
5
N
omrlm O N U ) ~
000
emm ~ m m
3
m
N
a a a U rl