Sprinkler News - Bafsa
Sprinkler News - Bafsa
Sprinkler News - Bafsa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Protecting Property, Life and the Environment <strong>News</strong>letter No 17 Page 8<br />
Technical Matters<br />
Clarification of LPC Rules —Help is at hand !<br />
Industry stakeholders who need clarification of LPC <strong>Sprinkler</strong><br />
Rules should contact : -<br />
Dr James Glockling of the FPA<br />
E-mail: jglockling@thefpa.co.uk<br />
The Review of DD251<br />
Extracts from a presentation by David Warman of RMD and<br />
BASA council member given at the recent Stamford seminar<br />
Hopefully by later this year we should be at the final draft<br />
stage DD251 (2004) which at that stage will still not be a British<br />
Standard.<br />
The technical differences between domestic and residential<br />
systems and their incorporation into the standard have caused<br />
some problems in the review and perhaps we would have<br />
been better served by 2 separate standards for Domestic &<br />
Residential, Domestic being single family dwellings.<br />
BASA/LPCB would like to see DD251 incorporated into the<br />
LPS1048 installer scheme.<br />
Concerns have been expressed by many experienced industry<br />
stakeholders relating to DD251’s design criteria’s possible<br />
inadequacy for certain residential premises containing large<br />
rooms or openly communicating areas. Queries have also<br />
been raised relating to the non protection of loft space or allowing<br />
only partial protection.<br />
All these points and others need careful consideration and<br />
should not be overlooked in the haste to get the standard reviewed<br />
which would also be highly irresponsible.<br />
Some people are promoting the stance “Anything is better<br />
than nothing’. However, this is considered irresponsible where<br />
lives are concerned.<br />
Implementation of the new 4 Level LPS1048 (Installer<br />
scheme) should be up and running in 2005<br />
The current status of installer’s position/level in the new<br />
scheme and details of the future programme/implementation<br />
are available on the BRE web-page.<br />
Changes to BS EN 12845:2003<br />
CEN have proposed to amend the text of EN12845 in response<br />
to a complaint from Germany.<br />
The text will revert to the original Voting Draft which is already<br />
on the BASA site. The proposed new text and a full explanation<br />
can be found at:-http://www.basa.org.uk/snews<br />
The document is 200 pages in length.<br />
Stewart Kidd is contacting the FPA to determine how they propose<br />
to handle this matter by suggesting that they issue free<br />
amendment sheets to all those who have bought copies.<br />
EN12845 will run in tandem with BS5306 to August 2006,<br />
then the BS is discontinued.<br />
BASA training courses are to be run, not only for LPS1048 competency<br />
tests, but also for the new EN12845. See page 21.<br />
Review of LPS1254 (Tank Standard)<br />
BRE have invited comments on the review of LPS 1254 and<br />
below, abbreviated, are some of the comments put forward by<br />
BASA /BASA members.<br />
Peter Armstrong, David Robinson and John Carr will be attending<br />
the review meetings and if you have any further comments<br />
please let any of the above know asap. as the first<br />
meeting is on 15th June.<br />
Tank Type<br />
Why not just have one tank Type A/D and simplify the matter.<br />
15 year life-- “suitable for sprinkler service without emptying,<br />
cleaning, maintenance or repair for a period not less than 15<br />
years”.<br />
These words need to be deleted in full.<br />
If these words are not removed then the tank suppliers/BRE<br />
must take full responsibility and provide some kind of insurance<br />
backed scheme to kick in, in the event the tank supplier<br />
is no longer in existence. eg. Malgar<br />
In any event what do these words mean in practice ie. no<br />
maintenance or repair? What about the ball valve ?<br />
♦ Do we need immersion heaters?<br />
♦ What about external corrosion protection ?<br />
♦ Low level access panel for maintenance ?<br />
Galvanising /Equivalent Protection Measures /Bitumen<br />
Coating --Future tank specification<br />
By BRE's own admission there was very little evidence/<br />
scientific analysis/ tests/calculations carried out by BRE , or<br />
the like, for the existing specification requirements (ie. 610 g/<br />
m) being suitable for 15 years, even though BRE amazingly<br />
confirmed " fitness for purpose " at this 15 year level .<br />
It is therefore vital to learn from the previous shortcomings<br />
and ensure that whatever specification is arrived at, particularly<br />
for the butyl liners, is adequate.<br />
Installers and customers have relied exclusively on BRE's endorsement<br />
of the tanks.<br />
The installers will leave it to the experts to decide on an adequate<br />
specification in future but will hold them liable for their<br />
actions.<br />
Other Issues<br />
BRE Assessment/Ongoing Audit Regime<br />
In view of the acknowledged failings in BRE’s procedures<br />
(ie.Galglass saga), BRE to fully detail their assessment<br />
and ongoing audit procedures of tank suppliers,<br />
so another "Galglass" can never be allowed to<br />
occur again .<br />
Tank Inspection Procedures<br />
These are to be fully detailed ie. frequency, service<br />
engineers checklist / reports, etc.<br />
ie what is expected at any inspection and how does<br />
this fit in with the "maintenance free" statement and<br />
who is qualified to carry it out.<br />
Resolution to the on going Galglass saga ,<br />
to the satisfaction of the installers, and as detailed in<br />
the BASA correspondence on this issue.