20.04.2013 Views

Sprinkler News - Bafsa

Sprinkler News - Bafsa

Sprinkler News - Bafsa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Protecting Property, Life and the Environment <strong>News</strong>letter No 17 Page 8<br />

Technical Matters<br />

Clarification of LPC Rules —Help is at hand !<br />

Industry stakeholders who need clarification of LPC <strong>Sprinkler</strong><br />

Rules should contact : -<br />

Dr James Glockling of the FPA<br />

E-mail: jglockling@thefpa.co.uk<br />

The Review of DD251<br />

Extracts from a presentation by David Warman of RMD and<br />

BASA council member given at the recent Stamford seminar<br />

Hopefully by later this year we should be at the final draft<br />

stage DD251 (2004) which at that stage will still not be a British<br />

Standard.<br />

The technical differences between domestic and residential<br />

systems and their incorporation into the standard have caused<br />

some problems in the review and perhaps we would have<br />

been better served by 2 separate standards for Domestic &<br />

Residential, Domestic being single family dwellings.<br />

BASA/LPCB would like to see DD251 incorporated into the<br />

LPS1048 installer scheme.<br />

Concerns have been expressed by many experienced industry<br />

stakeholders relating to DD251’s design criteria’s possible<br />

inadequacy for certain residential premises containing large<br />

rooms or openly communicating areas. Queries have also<br />

been raised relating to the non protection of loft space or allowing<br />

only partial protection.<br />

All these points and others need careful consideration and<br />

should not be overlooked in the haste to get the standard reviewed<br />

which would also be highly irresponsible.<br />

Some people are promoting the stance “Anything is better<br />

than nothing’. However, this is considered irresponsible where<br />

lives are concerned.<br />

Implementation of the new 4 Level LPS1048 (Installer<br />

scheme) should be up and running in 2005<br />

The current status of installer’s position/level in the new<br />

scheme and details of the future programme/implementation<br />

are available on the BRE web-page.<br />

Changes to BS EN 12845:2003<br />

CEN have proposed to amend the text of EN12845 in response<br />

to a complaint from Germany.<br />

The text will revert to the original Voting Draft which is already<br />

on the BASA site. The proposed new text and a full explanation<br />

can be found at:-http://www.basa.org.uk/snews<br />

The document is 200 pages in length.<br />

Stewart Kidd is contacting the FPA to determine how they propose<br />

to handle this matter by suggesting that they issue free<br />

amendment sheets to all those who have bought copies.<br />

EN12845 will run in tandem with BS5306 to August 2006,<br />

then the BS is discontinued.<br />

BASA training courses are to be run, not only for LPS1048 competency<br />

tests, but also for the new EN12845. See page 21.<br />

Review of LPS1254 (Tank Standard)<br />

BRE have invited comments on the review of LPS 1254 and<br />

below, abbreviated, are some of the comments put forward by<br />

BASA /BASA members.<br />

Peter Armstrong, David Robinson and John Carr will be attending<br />

the review meetings and if you have any further comments<br />

please let any of the above know asap. as the first<br />

meeting is on 15th June.<br />

Tank Type<br />

Why not just have one tank Type A/D and simplify the matter.<br />

15 year life-- “suitable for sprinkler service without emptying,<br />

cleaning, maintenance or repair for a period not less than 15<br />

years”.<br />

These words need to be deleted in full.<br />

If these words are not removed then the tank suppliers/BRE<br />

must take full responsibility and provide some kind of insurance<br />

backed scheme to kick in, in the event the tank supplier<br />

is no longer in existence. eg. Malgar<br />

In any event what do these words mean in practice ie. no<br />

maintenance or repair? What about the ball valve ?<br />

♦ Do we need immersion heaters?<br />

♦ What about external corrosion protection ?<br />

♦ Low level access panel for maintenance ?<br />

Galvanising /Equivalent Protection Measures /Bitumen<br />

Coating --Future tank specification<br />

By BRE's own admission there was very little evidence/<br />

scientific analysis/ tests/calculations carried out by BRE , or<br />

the like, for the existing specification requirements (ie. 610 g/<br />

m) being suitable for 15 years, even though BRE amazingly<br />

confirmed " fitness for purpose " at this 15 year level .<br />

It is therefore vital to learn from the previous shortcomings<br />

and ensure that whatever specification is arrived at, particularly<br />

for the butyl liners, is adequate.<br />

Installers and customers have relied exclusively on BRE's endorsement<br />

of the tanks.<br />

The installers will leave it to the experts to decide on an adequate<br />

specification in future but will hold them liable for their<br />

actions.<br />

Other Issues<br />

BRE Assessment/Ongoing Audit Regime<br />

In view of the acknowledged failings in BRE’s procedures<br />

(ie.Galglass saga), BRE to fully detail their assessment<br />

and ongoing audit procedures of tank suppliers,<br />

so another "Galglass" can never be allowed to<br />

occur again .<br />

Tank Inspection Procedures<br />

These are to be fully detailed ie. frequency, service<br />

engineers checklist / reports, etc.<br />

ie what is expected at any inspection and how does<br />

this fit in with the "maintenance free" statement and<br />

who is qualified to carry it out.<br />

Resolution to the on going Galglass saga ,<br />

to the satisfaction of the installers, and as detailed in<br />

the BASA correspondence on this issue.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!