22.04.2013 Views

Chapter 2 Elements of Abstract Group Theory

Chapter 2 Elements of Abstract Group Theory

Chapter 2 Elements of Abstract Group Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Elements</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> 15<br />

The terms “multiplication,” “product,” and “unit” used in this definition<br />

are not meant to imply that the composition law corresponds to<br />

ordinary multiplication. The multiplication <strong>of</strong> two elements is only an<br />

abstract rule for combining an ordered pair <strong>of</strong> two group elements to<br />

obtain a third group element. The difference from ordinary multiplication<br />

becomes even more apparent from the fact that the composition<br />

law need not be commutative, i.e., the product ab need not equal ba for<br />

distinct group elements a and b. If a group does have a commutative<br />

composition law, it is said to be commutative or Abelian.<br />

Despite the somewhat abstract tone <strong>of</strong> these comments, a moment’s<br />

reflection leads to the realization that the structure <strong>of</strong> groups is ideally<br />

suited to the description <strong>of</strong> symmetry in physical systems. The group<br />

elements <strong>of</strong>ten correspond to coordinate transformations <strong>of</strong> either geometrical<br />

objects or <strong>of</strong> equations <strong>of</strong> motion, with the composition law<br />

corresponding to matrix multiplication or the usual composition law<br />

<strong>of</strong> functions, 3 so the associativity property is guaranteed. 4 If two operations<br />

each correspond to symmetry operations, then their product<br />

clearly must as well. The identity corresponds to performing no transformation<br />

at all and the inverse <strong>of</strong> each transformation corresponds<br />

to performing the transformation in reverse, which must exist for the<br />

transformation to be well-defined (cf. Example 2.4).<br />

Example 2.1. Consider the set <strong>of</strong> integers,<br />

...,−3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3,...<br />

with the composition rule being ordinary addition. The sum <strong>of</strong> any two<br />

integers is an integer, thus ensuring closure, addition is an associative<br />

operation, 0 is the identity, and the inverse <strong>of</strong> n is −n, which is clearly<br />

an integer. Thus, the integers form a group under addition. This group<br />

is denoted by Z (derived from the German word Zahlen for integers).<br />

3 For two functions f(x) and g(x), the application <strong>of</strong> f, followed by the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> g is g[f(x)], and the application <strong>of</strong> g followed by the application <strong>of</strong> f is f[g(x)].<br />

4 The associativity <strong>of</strong> linear operations in general, and matrices in particular,<br />

is discussed by Wigner in <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> (Academic, New York, 1959), along with<br />

other group properties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!