!I :5 THE COURT: LADIES MADAM FORELADY, AND GENTLEMEN ...

i
L-
OJ
::;;
a:
0
l.L
;,:
()
0
f-
(/)
a:
w(/)
:5
a,..
a
"~ ,;,
L!)
C\J
6
a
CO?
11.
::J
0
a:
CJ
>- OJ
a:
0()
W
I
f-
19
20
21
22
23
24
PAGE 894
1 MR. BALL: I DO HAVE A SUGGESTION,
2 YOUR HONOR, IF I COULD?
3 THE COURT: SURE.
4 MR. BALL: YOU HAVE EXCUSED MR.
5 AUDET, THE JUROR. I ASK THAT WE PUT HIM ON
6 THE STAND AND ASK HIM IF HE RECALLS WHAT THAT
7 PERSON WAS WEARING YESTERDAY OR THE DAY
8 BEFORE. IN WHICH CASE, WE WOULD KNOW WHETHER
9 OR NOT THAT IS A PERJURED -- WE HAVE A
10 PERJURER NOW ON THE STAND OR WE HAVE AN HONEST
11
12
13
I
14 I
!
151
I
MISTAKE MADE BY ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR AT
LEAST A BETTER IDEA.
THE COURT: WELL, LET ME THROW THIS
OUT TO YOU, GENTLEMEN. IF WE DO NOTHING AND
RELY UPON THE JURY'S RESPONSE ALREADY, AND
16 THEY OF COURSE HAVEN'T HEARD MR. BERGMAN'S
17 TESTIMONY, JURY'S.
18 RESPOND THAT THEY CAN CAST THE
EPISODE OUT OF THEIR MIND AND NOT BE
INFLUENCED BY THE, SINCE WE HAVE NOW
SEGREGRATED THE ONE JUROR WHOM WE FELT COULD
NOT DO THAT, NAMELY MR. AUDET, IF WE CONTINUE
WE'LL DO SO WITH A WITNESS WHO MAY BE
IMPEACHABLE ON CROSS-EXAMINATION BY QUESTIONS
l
I,
I,
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
,I