responsiveness summary to public comments - US Environmental ...
responsiveness summary to public comments - US Environmental ...
responsiveness summary to public comments - US Environmental ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 2 of 40<br />
responses <strong>to</strong> those <strong>comments</strong>. Because similar <strong>comments</strong> were made by multiple individuals, the<br />
<strong>responsiveness</strong> <strong>summary</strong> groups those <strong>comments</strong> accordingly and provides <strong>summary</strong> responses.<br />
A few letters of comment referenced <strong>comments</strong> that had previously been submitted <strong>to</strong> the<br />
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) during the its <strong>public</strong> notice(s) on its<br />
proposed 2002 Section 303(d) list. As alluded <strong>to</strong> earlier, EPA had already examined Missouri’s<br />
<strong>public</strong> comment record during its review of the State’s 2002 Section 303(d) list submission<br />
package <strong>to</strong> determine if the State adequately responded <strong>to</strong> comment, and whether or not the State<br />
demonstrated good cause for not including on the list either waterbodies or pollutants causing<br />
impairment. Section II.G. in Enclosure 1 <strong>to</strong> EPA’s April 29, 2003 decision letter <strong>to</strong> Missouri<br />
regarding the State’s 303(d) list, addresses EPA’s determinations with regard <strong>to</strong> the State’s<br />
<strong>public</strong> comment record.<br />
Appendix A <strong>to</strong> this Responsiveness Summary contains a list of acronyms which are<br />
replete throughout this document; Appendix B identifies those waters and/or pollutants of<br />
concern that EPA had added and/or res<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> the list but are not being added <strong>to</strong> the final list<br />
based on information provided by MDNR and/or the <strong>public</strong> during EPA’s <strong>public</strong> comment<br />
period; and, Appendix C is the complete Section 303(d) list which includes final revisions <strong>to</strong><br />
Enclosure 5 <strong>to</strong> EPA’s April 29, 2003 decision letter <strong>to</strong> Missouri (i.e., U.S. EPA’s Consolidated<br />
2002 Missouri 303(d) List).<br />
Comments were received from the following individuals and entities:<br />
1. Robert J. Brundage - Assistant General Counsel, Premium Standard Farms, Inc.<br />
2. Deborah Neff - At<strong>to</strong>rney General’s Office, Missouri Clean Water Commission<br />
3. Dorris L. Bender - <strong>Environmental</strong> Compliance Managaer, Water Pollution Control<br />
Department, City of Independence<br />
3. Brian Wm Marshall - Vice-President, Marshall Engineering & Surveying, Inc.<br />
4. Albert Price<br />
5. David A. Shorr - Lathrop & Gage Law Offices<br />
6. Charles M. Scott - U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service<br />
7. Suzan Franck<br />
8. Steven W. Pagan<br />
9. Brian D. Nieves - 98 th District State Representative<br />
10. Ralph C. Schlemper - President, Friends of Fox Creek<br />
11. Richard Schlemper - Century Farm<br />
12. Kevin R. Schlemper - Friends of Fox Creek<br />
13. Mr. & Mrs. Punch Rascher<br />
14. Terry & Darla Pabst<br />
15. Leonard C. Duerbeck<br />
16. Shirley Poertner<br />
17. Steve Schwartz<br />
18. Susan Schlemper<br />
19. Walter Schlemper