25.04.2013 Views

responsiveness summary to public comments - US Environmental ...

responsiveness summary to public comments - US Environmental ...

responsiveness summary to public comments - US Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 2 of 40<br />

responses <strong>to</strong> those <strong>comments</strong>. Because similar <strong>comments</strong> were made by multiple individuals, the<br />

<strong>responsiveness</strong> <strong>summary</strong> groups those <strong>comments</strong> accordingly and provides <strong>summary</strong> responses.<br />

A few letters of comment referenced <strong>comments</strong> that had previously been submitted <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) during the its <strong>public</strong> notice(s) on its<br />

proposed 2002 Section 303(d) list. As alluded <strong>to</strong> earlier, EPA had already examined Missouri’s<br />

<strong>public</strong> comment record during its review of the State’s 2002 Section 303(d) list submission<br />

package <strong>to</strong> determine if the State adequately responded <strong>to</strong> comment, and whether or not the State<br />

demonstrated good cause for not including on the list either waterbodies or pollutants causing<br />

impairment. Section II.G. in Enclosure 1 <strong>to</strong> EPA’s April 29, 2003 decision letter <strong>to</strong> Missouri<br />

regarding the State’s 303(d) list, addresses EPA’s determinations with regard <strong>to</strong> the State’s<br />

<strong>public</strong> comment record.<br />

Appendix A <strong>to</strong> this Responsiveness Summary contains a list of acronyms which are<br />

replete throughout this document; Appendix B identifies those waters and/or pollutants of<br />

concern that EPA had added and/or res<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> the list but are not being added <strong>to</strong> the final list<br />

based on information provided by MDNR and/or the <strong>public</strong> during EPA’s <strong>public</strong> comment<br />

period; and, Appendix C is the complete Section 303(d) list which includes final revisions <strong>to</strong><br />

Enclosure 5 <strong>to</strong> EPA’s April 29, 2003 decision letter <strong>to</strong> Missouri (i.e., U.S. EPA’s Consolidated<br />

2002 Missouri 303(d) List).<br />

Comments were received from the following individuals and entities:<br />

1. Robert J. Brundage - Assistant General Counsel, Premium Standard Farms, Inc.<br />

2. Deborah Neff - At<strong>to</strong>rney General’s Office, Missouri Clean Water Commission<br />

3. Dorris L. Bender - <strong>Environmental</strong> Compliance Managaer, Water Pollution Control<br />

Department, City of Independence<br />

3. Brian Wm Marshall - Vice-President, Marshall Engineering & Surveying, Inc.<br />

4. Albert Price<br />

5. David A. Shorr - Lathrop & Gage Law Offices<br />

6. Charles M. Scott - U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service<br />

7. Suzan Franck<br />

8. Steven W. Pagan<br />

9. Brian D. Nieves - 98 th District State Representative<br />

10. Ralph C. Schlemper - President, Friends of Fox Creek<br />

11. Richard Schlemper - Century Farm<br />

12. Kevin R. Schlemper - Friends of Fox Creek<br />

13. Mr. & Mrs. Punch Rascher<br />

14. Terry & Darla Pabst<br />

15. Leonard C. Duerbeck<br />

16. Shirley Poertner<br />

17. Steve Schwartz<br />

18. Susan Schlemper<br />

19. Walter Schlemper

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!