25.04.2013 Views

The Bristol-Mendip foreland thrust belt - Department of Earth Sciences

The Bristol-Mendip foreland thrust belt - Department of Earth Sciences

The Bristol-Mendip foreland thrust belt - Department of Earth Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society, London, Vol. 143, 1986, pp. 63-73, 9 figs. Printed in Northern Ireland<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> <strong>foreland</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> <strong>belt</strong><br />

G. D . WILLIAMS & T. J . C H A P M A N ’<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Geology, University College, PO Box 78, Cardiff CF1 ZXL, U.K.<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Geological <strong>Sciences</strong>, Plymouth Polytechnic, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, U. K.<br />

Abstract: <strong>The</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>s and associated fold structures <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area are interpreted in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> a thin skinned, piggy-back <strong>foreland</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> <strong>belt</strong> <strong>of</strong> Variscan age with dominant northward<br />

transport. Strike-normal balanced sections and compatible strike-parallel sections have been constructed<br />

to illustrate the 3-D geometry <strong>of</strong> the linked <strong>thrust</strong> system. North-south shortening <strong>of</strong> c.<br />

20 km (40%) is calculated from deformed and restored strike-normal sections. A thick and extensive<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> wedge <strong>of</strong> pre-Old Red Sandstone basement in the west <strong>of</strong> the area is responsible for<br />

culminations expressed at the surface as the <strong>Mendip</strong> periclines. Uplifted culminations permit erosion<br />

to lower stratigraphic levels in the west and south <strong>of</strong> the area. Strike-parallel sections and a hanging<br />

wall cut-<strong>of</strong>f map indicate that the majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>s in the area are mainly oblique ramps rather than<br />

simple frontal and lateral ramps, or flats. <strong>The</strong> en-echelon pattern <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong> periclines may be<br />

related to the oblique NE climb <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> these <strong>thrust</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> angle <strong>of</strong> frontal ramp climb through the<br />

Dinantian stratigraphy is generally low, and this explains the presence <strong>of</strong> numerous klippen <strong>of</strong> Lower<br />

on Upper Carboniferous rocks, whilst suggesting that certain <strong>thrust</strong> sheets were much more extensive<br />

than present outcrops indicate. Early, pre-<strong>thrust</strong>ing movement on basement lineaments in the<br />

Variscan <strong>foreland</strong> created uplifts, angular unconformities and a predominance<br />

the north <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

<strong>of</strong> N-S structures in<br />

<strong>The</strong> area studied here (Fig. 1) includes the <strong>Bristol</strong> and<br />

Somerset coalfields and the <strong>Mendip</strong> Hills and it extends<br />

from Wells in the south to Tortworth in the north in the<br />

counties <strong>of</strong> Avon and Somerset. This area is covered by the<br />

BGS special 1 : 63,360 scale map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong> district, the<br />

Sheets 280, Wells and 281, Frome at 1 : 63,360 scale, and the<br />

1 : 50,000 Weston-Super-Mare sheet. <strong>The</strong> rocks <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

include Cambrian and Silurian sediments at Tortworth;<br />

?Silurian andesites and tuffs in the Beacon Hill area;<br />

Devonian <strong>of</strong> Old Red Sandstone (ORS) facies; and Lower<br />

and Upper Carboniferous rocks: all <strong>of</strong> which are involved in<br />

Variscan deformation. Permo-Triassic and younger rocks lie<br />

unconformably above this Variscan ‘basement’.<br />

A remarkably perceptive account <strong>of</strong> the stratigraphy and<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s was given by De la Beche (1846) in<br />

Geological a Survey map and memoir. <strong>The</strong> general<br />

resemblance between Permo-Carboniferous structures in the<br />

<strong>Bristol</strong>/Somerset coalfield and those <strong>of</strong> N France and<br />

western England was noted in the mid 19th century<br />

(Godwin-Austen 1856) and the possibility <strong>of</strong> intervening,<br />

concealed coalfields was proposed. Other notable, early<br />

contributions to the geology <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s were made by<br />

Bristow & Woodward (1871) on the coal prospects south <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Mendip</strong>s, and Woodward (1876) in a memoir on the<br />

East Somerset and <strong>Bristol</strong> coalfields. Vaughan (1905)<br />

introduced a scheme, using some <strong>Mendip</strong> localities, for the<br />

subdivision <strong>of</strong> the Lower Carboniferous on palaeontological<br />

grounds and both Sibly (1907) and Reynolds & Vaughan<br />

(1911) applied this scheme to the rocks <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> structural complexities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s began to be<br />

understood as early as 1824 when Buckland & Conybeare<br />

described overfolded and greatly contorted Coal Measures<br />

in the east <strong>Mendip</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> faulted ‘inliers’ <strong>of</strong> Carboniferous<br />

Limestone in the east <strong>Mendip</strong>s were the source <strong>of</strong> much<br />

debate (Woodward 1876; McMurtrie 1881; Winwood 1891;<br />

Ussher 1889). <strong>The</strong>se ‘inliers’ were considered to be either<br />

autochthonous, block-faulted fragments or allochthonous,<br />

63<br />

-l<br />

BATH<br />

Fig. 1. Map showing the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area and the location <strong>of</strong><br />

the structural map (Fig. 2). AV, Avonmouth; CH, Cheddar; CL,<br />

Clevedon; PH, Portishead; RS, Radstock; SH, Shepton Mallet;<br />

TW, Tortworth; WL, Wells; WM, Weston-super-Mare.<br />

over<strong>thrust</strong> pieces <strong>of</strong> Lower Carboniferous rocks, completely<br />

surrounded by Upper Carboniferous rocks. Sibly (1912)<br />

successfully interpreted the Vobster ‘inlier’ (see Fig. 2) as a<br />

klippe due large to<br />

scale over<strong>thrust</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Lower<br />

Carboniferous above Upper Carboniferous rocks. Reynolds<br />

& Greenly (1924) and Welch (1928, 1932) adopted the<br />

over<strong>thrust</strong>ing suggestion in interpreting the structures <strong>of</strong><br />

other parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s.


Fig. 2. Structural/lithostratigraphical map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area showing section lines A, B, C and D; major <strong>thrust</strong>s T1 to<br />

T3; and <strong>thrust</strong> zones T4 to T6. Klippen <strong>of</strong> Lower on Upper Carboniferous are labelled CK, Churchill; GK, Gordano; HK,<br />

Harptree; VK, Vobster and Upper Vobster. <strong>Mendip</strong> periclines are labelled BHP, Beacon Hill; BDP, Black Down; NHP, North<br />

Hill; PHP, Pen Hill. <strong>The</strong> ornament used for the various lithostratigraphic units is the same as on the cross-sections (Figs 6 , 7 and<br />

8).


More recent work has culminated in the publication <strong>of</strong><br />

BGS maps and associated memoirs (Green & Welch 1965;<br />

Whittaker & Green 1983). <strong>The</strong> crustal structure to the east<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s, based on deep seismic reflection pr<strong>of</strong>iles,<br />

has been elucidated by Chadwick et al. (1983) and<br />

re-evaluated by Williams & Brooks (1985). General<br />

accounts <strong>of</strong> the geology <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area have<br />

been published by Kellaway & Welch (1948), Cave<br />

and Kellaway & Hancock (1983).<br />

(1963)<br />

In this paper, we use as a basis the abundance <strong>of</strong><br />

published structural information in the form <strong>of</strong> maps,<br />

cross-sections and mine and borehole data from the <strong>Mendip</strong><br />

area. <strong>The</strong>se, coupled with our own field observations, have<br />

enabled us to carry out detailed studies <strong>of</strong> individual <strong>thrust</strong><br />

faults and to elucidate the geometry <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong> <strong>thrust</strong><br />

system using balanced cross-sections. We present here a<br />

thin-skinned interpretation for the <strong>Mendip</strong> <strong>foreland</strong> <strong>thrust</strong><br />

<strong>belt</strong> and we discuss the evidence for such a geometry.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> stratigraphy<br />

<strong>The</strong> oldest exposed rocks in the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area are the<br />

Tremadocian shales <strong>of</strong> the Tortworth inlier (Curtis 1955)<br />

(Fig. 1). Also Tortworth, at mudstones, calcareous<br />

sandstones and limestones <strong>of</strong> Llandoverian and Wenlockian<br />

age are present. Presumed Silurian volcanic rocks occur in<br />

the core <strong>of</strong> the Beacon Hill pericline in the south <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Mendip</strong>s (Fig. 2 ) . <strong>The</strong> marine Silurian is overlain by a<br />

E<br />

0<br />

v)<br />

4 UPPER<br />

1<br />

d' I<br />

BELT BRISTOL-MENDIP<br />

THRUST FORELAND<br />

65<br />

COAL SERIES<br />

PENNANT SERIES<br />

QUARTZITIC SANDSTONE GROUP<br />

HOTWELLS LIMESTONE<br />

CLIFTON DOWN LIMESTONE<br />

BURRINGTON OOLITE<br />

I BLACK<br />

---I<br />

1<br />

7<br />

ROCK LIMESTONE<br />

LOWER LIMESTONE SHALE<br />

600 m-thick conformable sequence <strong>of</strong> Lower Devonian, Old<br />

Red Sandstone continental facies which is unconformably<br />

overlain by an Upper Devonian, Old Red Sandstone<br />

sequence varying in thickness from 500 m in the south to<br />

150 m in the north (Kellaway & Hancock 1983).<br />

Several significant non-sequences are present in the<br />

Dinantian succession <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s (Ramsbottom &<br />

Mitchell 1980), but the lithostratigraphy, based particularly<br />

on oolitic marker beds, can be correlated successfully from<br />

the <strong>Mendip</strong>s in the south to the Avon Gorge in the north<br />

(Whittaker & Green 1983). <strong>The</strong> total Dinantian sequence is<br />

approximately 800 m thick in the <strong>Bristol</strong> Coalfield (Kellaway<br />

& Hancock 1983). We have adopted the lithostratigraphic<br />

scheme <strong>of</strong> nomenclature involving Carboniferous units d' to<br />

d6 (Fig. 3) as portrayed on the <strong>Bristol</strong> District special sheet<br />

(1:63,360). This scheme, although outdated, proved to be<br />

more workable when cross referring fault cut-<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>of</strong><br />

stratigraphy, from maps to cross section, than either the<br />

biostratigraphy <strong>of</strong> Ramsbottom & Mitchell (1980) or the<br />

detailed lithostratigraphy <strong>of</strong> Whittaker & Green (1983). <strong>The</strong><br />

Dinantian is represented by various facies <strong>of</strong> Carboniferous<br />

Limestone deposited as platform or shelf type limestones (d'<br />

to d3 <strong>of</strong> the present scheme). In the northern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

district, deposition was not continuous throughout the<br />

Carboniferous and it is probable that uplift and significant<br />

erosion took place along the NE-SW trending Lower<br />

Severn Axis in mid-Carboniferous times, prior to the<br />

deposition <strong>of</strong> the Upper Coal Measures (Kellaway & Welch<br />

1948; Whittaker & Green 1983). Evidence <strong>of</strong> this is the<br />

UPPER COAL MEASURES<br />

L. a M. COAL MEASURES<br />

MILLSTONE GRIT<br />

CARBONIFEROUS LIMESTONE DINANTIAN<br />

OLD SANDSTONE RED DEVONIAN<br />

WESTPHALIAN<br />

NAMURIAN-<br />

Fig. 3. Lithostratigraphic summary and nomenclature <strong>of</strong> rock units involved in the Variscan<br />

deformation.


66 G . D . W I L L I A M S & T. J . CHAPMAN<br />

major overstep <strong>of</strong> Upper Coal Measures (d6) on to Old Red<br />

Sandstone and Dinantian strata (Nat. Grid ref. 483734).<br />

Namurian and Westphalian (d4, d5 and d‘) rocks <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Bristol</strong> Coalfield attain a maximum thickness <strong>of</strong> 1900 m.<br />

Major Variscan deformation occurred towards the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the Carboniferous giving rise to northerly-verging, asymmetric<br />

folds and <strong>thrust</strong> faults. As Permo-Triassic and<br />

younger sediments serve only to blanket the Variscan<br />

terrane, they have not been studied nor are they shown on<br />

our maps and cross-sections.<br />

Structural synthesis<br />

<strong>The</strong> geology <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>-<strong>Bristol</strong> area is dominated by the<br />

Variscan fold and <strong>thrust</strong> structures exposed through the<br />

Permian-Mesozoic cover (Fig. 2). Old Red Sandstone and<br />

older rocks are exposed in the extreme north <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

(including Silurian rocks <strong>of</strong> the Tortworth inlier), and at<br />

Portishead mainly in the core <strong>of</strong> an ENE-WSW trending<br />

anticline. the south, In notable outcrops <strong>of</strong> pre-<br />

Carboniferous rocks occur in the en-echelon, E-W trending<br />

<strong>Mendip</strong> periclines named from NW to SE the Blackdown,<br />

North Hill, Pen Hill and Beacon Hill periclines. Although<br />

periclinal in general form, these folds are asymmetric and<br />

northerly verging in N-S pr<strong>of</strong>ile with steep, southerlydipping<br />

axial surfaces. <strong>The</strong> E-W trend <strong>of</strong> structures in the<br />

south <strong>of</strong> the area changes to a NE-SW or N-S trend in the<br />

north.<br />

Thrust faults have been recognized for many years in the<br />

area and have been assigned a plethora <strong>of</strong> local names. We<br />

propose that many <strong>of</strong> these separately named <strong>thrust</strong>s are<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> single, laterally persistent structures. <strong>The</strong> isolated<br />

klippen <strong>of</strong> Carboniferous Limestone indicate large <strong>thrust</strong><br />

displacements and this supports our interpretation <strong>of</strong> large<br />

strike lengths for individual <strong>thrust</strong>s (Elliott 1976). We have<br />

assigned the symbols T, to T, to major <strong>thrust</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the area:<br />

the subscripts increase in the order <strong>of</strong> piggy-back <strong>thrust</strong><br />

development from hinterland to <strong>foreland</strong>. Thrusts T1, T,<br />

and probably T, are single laterally persistent structures,<br />

whereas T, to Ts are zones comprising several <strong>thrust</strong>s, which<br />

may join or branch, or may be separate with overlapping<br />

tips (see western part <strong>of</strong> T, on Fig. 2).<br />

Thrust T, (see Fig. 2) is a large E-W <strong>thrust</strong> passing close<br />

to Wells and Shepton Mallet. <strong>The</strong> klippen <strong>of</strong> Vobster,<br />

Upper Vobster and Luckington are underlain by <strong>thrust</strong> T,.<br />

Thrust T, stretches from Weston-Super-Mare in the west to<br />

the Radstock Coalfield in the east and it underlies the<br />

Churchill and Harptree klippen (local names: Bleadon<br />

Thrust, South-Western Over<strong>thrust</strong>, Emborough Thrust and<br />

Southern Over<strong>thrust</strong>). Thrust T3 corresponds the to<br />

Farmborough fault <strong>belt</strong> (Green & Welch 1965). Farther<br />

north (Fig. 2) a zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>s, T,, extends from Clevedon<br />

on the coast to NE <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bristol</strong>. Local names include<br />

Clevedon, Naish House and Tickenham faults and this<br />

structure continues into the Kingswood Anticline east <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Bristol</strong>. Kellaway & Hancock (1983) termed this zone the<br />

Avon Thrust. <strong>The</strong> Gordano klippe is underlain by <strong>thrust</strong> T,.<br />

Thrust T, is a concealed NNE-SSW splay from T, and<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> T, is the NE-SW trending Ridgeway Thrust. Because<br />

<strong>of</strong> their orientation, it is likely that <strong>thrust</strong>s T5 and T, have<br />

undergone significant oblique-slip movement during Variscan<br />

shortening.<br />

<strong>The</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> various klippen related to three <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major <strong>thrust</strong>s helps to elucidate the 3-D geometry and<br />

tectonic history <strong>of</strong> the area. A strike-normal section across<br />

the Harptree klippe and North Hill Pericline (Fig. 3) shows<br />

steeply dipping to inverted Carboniferous Limestone (d’)<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> above Coal Measures (d’) on <strong>thrust</strong> T,. In a<br />

piggy-back <strong>thrust</strong>ing interpretation, this <strong>thrust</strong> has been<br />

folded above the North Hill Pericline, now eroded, but is<br />

preserved to the north in the core <strong>of</strong> a syncline. <strong>The</strong><br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> this structure (Fig. 4) involves movement on an<br />

early <strong>thrust</strong> (TJ which puts Dinantian on Westphalian<br />

strata. A subsequent, lower <strong>thrust</strong> creates the North Hill<br />

pericline as a tip line fold (Williams & Chapman 1983;<br />

Hossack 1983) responsible for folding <strong>of</strong> the overlying strata<br />

and the overlying <strong>thrust</strong> T,. It is clearly seen on both the<br />

<strong>Bristol</strong> and Wells 1:63,360 sheets that <strong>thrust</strong> T2, labelled<br />

‘South-Western Over<strong>thrust</strong>’ and ‘Emborough Thrust’ on<br />

those maps, is folded around the North Hill Pericline (Fig.<br />

2). This relationship, and those <strong>of</strong> other klippen,<br />

demonstrates the piggy-back nature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>thrust</strong> evolution.<br />

Lower and more northerly <strong>thrust</strong>s<br />

later than the folded upper <strong>thrust</strong>s.<br />

are clezrly developed<br />

Blind <strong>thrust</strong>s with frontal tips beneath the erosion level<br />

(Thompson 1981) are proposed for the generation <strong>of</strong> some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the periclines (e.g. North Hill Pericline, see Fig. 4).<br />

Lateral <strong>thrust</strong> tips may be seen elsewhere in the <strong>Mendip</strong>s<br />

indicating that not all <strong>thrust</strong>s are laterally persistent<br />

structures. On the north side <strong>of</strong> the North Hill Pericline<br />

(543526) the Miners Arms Thrust (Green<br />

emplaces Old Red Sandstone Carboniferous<br />

to on<br />

& Welch 1965)<br />

Limestone, omitting Lower Limestone Shales (d’”). To the<br />

west <strong>of</strong> the Stock Hill Fault (see the <strong>Bristol</strong> or Wells sheets)<br />

this <strong>thrust</strong> is not exposed and the Lower Limestone Shales<br />

are once more present, indicating a frontal tip (see Fig. 4).<br />

A similar structure exists (490525) in a small fault that splays<br />

from the South Western Over<strong>thrust</strong> (TJ. In a south-easterly<br />

direction along this <strong>thrust</strong> the stratigraphic separation<br />

decreases until at the tip there is no stratigraphic separation;<br />

the <strong>thrust</strong> terminates and a tip line fold is present (495523).<br />

A third example <strong>of</strong> a lateral <strong>thrust</strong> tip occurs on <strong>thrust</strong> T,,<br />

the Tickenham Fault (485728). Stratigraphic separation<br />

decreases in a north-easterly direction until it reaches zero<br />

at a tip line fold.<br />

Thrust faults across the whole <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area can<br />

be observed in map view to cross-cut lithostratigraphy in<br />

both footwall and hangingwall along the exposed <strong>thrust</strong><br />

lengths, indicating the presence <strong>of</strong> lateral or oblique ramps<br />

rather than simple frontal ramps or<br />

reality, irregular <strong>thrust</strong> surfaces cross-cut sub-planar<br />

flats (Butler 1982). In<br />

lithostratigraphic interfaces to give a complex pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

hangingwall and footwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f lines. Using hangingwall<br />

stratigraphic cut <strong>of</strong>f points along <strong>thrust</strong> T,, the Dinantian<br />

stratigraphy preserved in the T, klippen, and the balanced<br />

cross-sections (Figs 6 & 7), we have constructed a<br />

hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f line map (Fig. 5). In plan, cut-<strong>of</strong>f lines to<br />

the north <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> T, are now eroded and those to the south<br />

<strong>of</strong> this <strong>thrust</strong> are buried. Assuming initially sub-planar<br />

stratigraphic interfaces, the observed irregularities in the<br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>f lines reflect the presence <strong>of</strong> a large-scale oblique<br />

ramp which becomes gradually frontal in the west <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area. On this structure is superimposed a smaller scale<br />

culmination above the North Hill Pericline, defined by<br />

frontal and oblique ramps. <strong>The</strong> hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f map<br />

(Fig. 5) has been used to estimate the angle <strong>of</strong> ramp climb<br />

through the Dinantian stratigraphy.


B R I S T O L - M E N D I P F O R E L A N D T H R U S T B E L T 67<br />

ORS<br />

---_<br />

NORTH 1<br />

NlVER EAKER HILL PEN HILL<br />

_ c<br />

5 km<br />

Fig. 4. Evolutionary diagram to explain the piggy-back nature <strong>of</strong> the North Hill Pericline<br />

(NHP) and the East Harptree klippe (EHK). V = H scale.<br />

Fig. 5. Stratigraphic cut-<strong>of</strong>f map for the hangingwall <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> T2. Buried cut-<strong>of</strong>fs occur to the south and eroded<br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>fs to the north <strong>of</strong> the main outcrop <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> T2. Dark stipple, Old Red Sandstone; clear, Carboniferous<br />

Limestone (including Millstone Grit); light stipple, Coal Measures. BDP, Black Down Pericline; NHP, North Hill<br />

Pericline, PHP, Pen Hill Pericline.<br />

I


68 G . D . WILLIAMS & T. J. C H A P M A N<br />

Strike-normal cross-sections<br />

1.1 km. A comparison <strong>of</strong> the two sections A and B (Figs 6 &<br />

Two approximately north-south balanced cross-sections, A<br />

and B, have been constructed (section lines on Fig. 2) with<br />

the relevant displacement-distance diagrams (Chapman &<br />

Williams 1984) (Figs 6 & 7). <strong>The</strong> hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f map<br />

(Fig. 5) indicates that <strong>thrust</strong> T, cuts up section northwards<br />

through the stratigraphy at a maximum angle <strong>of</strong> 22" in the<br />

east <strong>of</strong> the area and a minimum <strong>of</strong> 6" in the west. <strong>The</strong> angle<br />

measurtd is that between stratigraphic interfaces in the<br />

hangingwall and <strong>thrust</strong> surface T, on the strike-normal<br />

sections. This implies a thin skinned geometry for the <strong>thrust</strong><br />

system. <strong>The</strong> amplitude <strong>of</strong> major asymmetric folds and the<br />

sheet dip or fold envelope dip can be estimated from surface<br />

dip data. <strong>The</strong> sheet dip defines the angle <strong>of</strong> dip <strong>of</strong> the basal<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> fault, and the amplitude <strong>of</strong> major folds dictates the<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> sub Old Red Sandstone rocks involved in the<br />

linked-<strong>thrust</strong> system on area balance arguments. Using these<br />

criteria, the minimum depth to the basal <strong>thrust</strong> is estimated<br />

to vary from 3 to 5 km and is displayed on Figs 6 and 7.<br />

<strong>The</strong> western section, A (Fig. 6) shows that <strong>thrust</strong> T, cuts<br />

7) shows a thicker basement in the <strong>thrust</strong> sheets in the west.<br />

In the east, the Coal Measures <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong> and Somerset<br />

Coalfields are exposed above a dkcollement involving only a<br />

thin basement wedge. <strong>The</strong> depth to dCcollement across the<br />

south <strong>of</strong> the area is consistent at 4.9 km and in the north it is<br />

at a depth <strong>of</strong> 3.1 km representing a basal <strong>thrust</strong> presently<br />

dipping south at 3". Section B (Fig. 7) has undergone a total<br />

shortening <strong>of</strong> 27 km (38%) using the hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong><br />

base ORS by T, as a datum.<br />

In both footwall and hangingwall, <strong>thrust</strong>s T, and T, are<br />

at a higher stratigraphic level in the east (Fig. 6) than the<br />

west (Fig. 7). This observation is supported by the T2<br />

hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f diagram (Fig. 5) which illustrates<br />

oblique ramp climb in a north-easterly direction. In reality<br />

both T, and T3 are oblique hangingwall and footwall ramps,<br />

climbing stratigraphy towards the NE and it is possible that<br />

the en-echelon nature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong> periclines may be, in<br />

part, related to these <strong>thrust</strong>s.<br />

up stratigraphy in the transport direction at a very shallow<br />

angle. It is folded by the Blackdown Pericline and an<br />

Strike-parallel cross-sections<br />

associated syncline at Blackdown has subsequently been<br />

eroded. This syncline plunges westwards and preserves d3<br />

Two strike-parallel cross sections C & D (Fig. 8) have been<br />

constructed, as viewed southwards against the <strong>thrust</strong><br />

limestone in the Churchill klippe to the west <strong>of</strong> section line movement direction. Major <strong>thrust</strong>s T1 to T4 are labelled,<br />

A. <strong>The</strong> shallow angle <strong>of</strong> T, ramp climb means that <strong>thrust</strong> and it may be noted that older rocks are consistently<br />

sheet T, once extended significantly farther north than displaced above younger rocks.<br />

suggested by the present outcrop map. Thrust T3 is Section C (Fig. 8) illustrates a greater thickness <strong>of</strong> Lower<br />

responsible for the generation <strong>of</strong> the Blackdown Pericline Palaeozoic basement in the west and the corresponding<br />

and it possibly joins T, which forms a ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Avon preservation <strong>of</strong> higher Carboniferous stratigraphy in the<br />

Thrust, T4, and those to the north represent only minor east. Thrusts T, and T, exhibit numerous footwall and<br />

displacements. <strong>The</strong> structural complexity at Portishead is hangingwall stratigraphic cut-<strong>of</strong>fs and this corroborates their<br />

due to pre-Pennant Measures (d6) folding and erosion. <strong>The</strong> interpretation as lateral or oblique ramps. A sequential<br />

unconformable relationship <strong>of</strong> d6 to folded lower units may diagram (Fig. 9) illustrates how different hangingwall and<br />

be seen on the restored section. Using the amplitude <strong>of</strong> footwall stratigraphies were juxtaposed along <strong>thrust</strong> T,. In a<br />

major folds such as the Blackdown Pericline, it appears that layer-cake stratigraphy, the <strong>thrust</strong> trajectory will be<br />

the thickness <strong>of</strong> pre-ORS basement above the basal <strong>thrust</strong> irregular if the <strong>thrust</strong> cuts up and down stratigraphy laterally<br />

varies from 1.2 km in the north to 2.2 km in the south. <strong>The</strong> (Fig. sa). <strong>The</strong> irregularly truncated hangingwall stratigraphy<br />

hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> base ORS by <strong>thrust</strong> T2 may be used as will be transported in a <strong>foreland</strong> direction and may be<br />

a datum point to calculate a total shortening <strong>of</strong> 19 km (38%) emplaced on an irregular footwall (Fig. 9b). Internal<br />

for this section. Displacement-distance diagrams (Chapman hangingwall strain will take the form <strong>of</strong> culminations and<br />

& Williams 1984) shown in Figs 6 & 7 record shortening depressions. Because a <strong>thrust</strong> will cut up stratigraphy in a<br />

only to the north, and in the footwall, <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> T,. This <strong>foreland</strong> direction, older rocks will be placed on younger<br />

accounts for only approximately 20% shortening in both rocks (Fig. 9c). Further folding <strong>of</strong> both hangingwall and<br />

cross-sections A and B (Figs 6 & 7), and this serves to footwall, plus the intervening <strong>thrust</strong> fault T2 has been caused<br />

illustrate the magnitude <strong>of</strong> displacement on <strong>thrust</strong> T,. by movement on a lower <strong>thrust</strong> T, and a splay from T3, the<br />

Back<strong>thrust</strong>s south <strong>of</strong> Nailsea propagate from <strong>thrust</strong> T4 and Miners Arms Thrust (Fig. 9d). Thrust T3 cuts down section<br />

are responsible for small displacements which back rotate laterally, incorporating lower stratigraphy into the <strong>thrust</strong><br />

and steepen <strong>thrust</strong> T,. Cross sections on the 1 : 63,360 <strong>Bristol</strong> sheet in a westerly direction. This has generated a major<br />

sheet show these faults as steep S-dipping normal faults. <strong>The</strong> N-S trending culmination which serves to fold the overlying<br />

outcrop pattern <strong>of</strong> the Brockley Fault (470680) indicates a <strong>thrust</strong> T,. This culmination is the North Hill Pericline. <strong>The</strong><br />

northerly dip and supports its interpretation as a back<strong>thrust</strong>. general oblique NE climb <strong>of</strong> T, in its hangingwall is<br />

<strong>The</strong> eastern section, B (Fig. 7) shows that <strong>thrust</strong> T2 cuts responsible for the en-echelon pattern <strong>of</strong> the Black Down<br />

up section rapidly in the movement direction. It is folded and North Hill periclines.<br />

above the Beacon Hill Pericline, and the small syncline to Section D (Fig. 8) shows thick a wedge <strong>of</strong> Lower<br />

the north <strong>of</strong> Beacon Hill when projected eastwards is Palaeozoic rocks above the basal <strong>thrust</strong> in the west, and the<br />

responsible for the preservation <strong>of</strong> the Luckington, Vobster basal detachment within ORS to the east. In the east <strong>of</strong> this<br />

and Upper Vobster klippen. This section differs from A in section the N-S trending Coalpit Heath basin is seen to be<br />

that there is only a thin wedge <strong>of</strong> pre-ORS basement above underlain by the proposed extension <strong>of</strong> the Malvern fault<br />

the basal detachment and this wedge thins to zero beneath line. To the east <strong>of</strong> this, the ORS thins dramatically, and is<br />

the Radstock Coalfield (points R and R' on deformed and<br />

restored sections). To the north <strong>of</strong> point R, the basal <strong>thrust</strong><br />

underlain by Lower Palaeozoic basement. As with Section<br />

C, the existence <strong>of</strong> Lower Palaeozoic rocks above a planar<br />

fault is within the Old Red Sandstone sequence. <strong>The</strong><br />

basal <strong>thrust</strong> controls the present erosion level <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong><br />

maximum thickness <strong>of</strong> basement in the south <strong>of</strong> section B is culminations and depressions.


I<br />

c<br />

5<br />

0<br />

I<br />

c<br />

K<br />

0<br />

z a<br />

r<br />

n<br />

r----<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

-f<br />

n<br />

r<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

l<br />

I<br />

.f<br />

f<br />

I<br />

I<br />

f<br />

t-<br />

f<br />

t<br />

-


70<br />

G . D . WILLIAMS & T . J. C H A P M A N<br />

. I F-----<br />

I’ I


EAST<br />

BRISTOL-MENDIP FORELAND THRUST BELT 71<br />

5 ~~ km<br />

l 1<br />

C SECT. B SECT.A Cl<br />

I<br />

-<br />

SECT. C<br />

Fig. 8. Strike-parallel cross sections (C & D) across the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area. See Fig. 2 for the location <strong>of</strong> sections<br />

Vertical = horizontal scale.<br />

EAST WEST<br />

-<br />

Hangingwall<br />

- -- -_<br />

Discussion<br />

T 2<br />

We propose that the <strong>Mendip</strong>-<strong>Bristol</strong> area represents a thin<br />

-33<br />

d2<br />

ORS'' d l 7!.!.!.1.!.! ..:. ................... I ! .--<br />

.... : ...... . :, . ~ .............................................<br />

. . .........,.....,............<br />

. . . . . , . . . . m<br />

. ~ . . . . .<br />

skinned <strong>foreland</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> <strong>belt</strong> <strong>of</strong> Variscan age. <strong>The</strong> dominant<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> movement was south to north. Our<br />

interpretation is based on surface lithostratigraphic and<br />

T--_-- 2<br />

structural observations, plus mine and borehole information<br />

-_ Footwall . (see <strong>Bristol</strong> sheet) from which the balanced cross sections<br />

'. - -<br />

(Figs 6 & 7) were constructed. Evidence for the thin skinned<br />

/--<br />

...............................<br />

I I I I I I I I I I I I I ...-. I I I. . I . I . ) . . ~ . ~ . . I . I. . I . I . . ~ . I...... . I ~ I I I ~ ~ , ~ ~ I<br />

. . ;*.: . . . . . S . . . . . . . . .... . . . ............... . . .,.: :. .......... ,a,: . . . .:.. ::.I: ',: .. :. ..... :: 1 ................ nature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>belt</strong> is provided by the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

. . . . . . .<br />

far-travelled klippen (e.g. Upper Vobster, Churchill). A<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f points and the preserved<br />

stratigraphy in certain klippen have enabled the construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a hangingwall cut-<strong>of</strong>f map (Fig. 5 ) for <strong>thrust</strong> T2. By<br />

combining stratigraphic information with the position <strong>of</strong><br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>f lines, calculated angles <strong>of</strong> frontal ramp climb<br />

between 6" and 22" support the thin skinned interpretation.<br />

Further support for this suggestion is obtained from the<br />

sheet dip <strong>of</strong> the Lower Carboniferous rocks. We have<br />

assumed that the basal <strong>thrust</strong> is subparallel to this sheet dip<br />

in strike-normal sections. In similar forland <strong>thrust</strong> <strong>belt</strong>s such<br />

as the Appalachians (Gwinn 1964; Rodgers 1970) and the<br />

Rockies (Price 1981) both <strong>of</strong> which are well constrained by<br />

seismic data, the relationship between sheet dip and basal<br />

detachment is confirmed. Our interpretation <strong>of</strong> the Variscan<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the area differs markedly however from that<br />

Fig. 9. Hangingwall sequence diagram for <strong>thrust</strong> T2 and the<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> the culmination beneath it, as viewed southwards<br />

parallel to <strong>thrust</strong> movement direction. (a) preserved hangingwall<br />

stratigraphy, (b) footwall stratigraphy, (c) juxtaposition <strong>of</strong> two<br />

stratigraphies, and (d) generation <strong>of</strong> the culmination and folding <strong>of</strong><br />

given by Kellaway & Hancock (1983) who proposed a<br />

folded dkcollement in Silurian sandstone and ?hale beneath<br />

the Somerset and <strong>Bristol</strong> coalfields. Also, rather than<br />

piggy-back <strong>thrust</strong>ing with folded upper <strong>thrust</strong>s, Kellaway &<br />

Hancock (1983) proposed lag faults for the numerous<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> K?.<br />

klippep in the <strong>Mendip</strong>s.<br />

WEST


72 G . D . WILLIAMS & T. J . CHAPMAN<br />

the Somerset and <strong>Bristol</strong> coalfields. Also, rather than<br />

piggy-back <strong>thrust</strong>ing with folded upper <strong>thrust</strong>s, Kellaway &<br />

Hancock (1983) proposed lag faults for the numerous<br />

klippen in the <strong>Mendip</strong>s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> Lower Palaeozoic basement wedges<br />

into <strong>thrust</strong> sheets satisfies area balancing constraints. <strong>The</strong><br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> Lower Palaeozoic basement in the <strong>thrust</strong> sheets<br />

calculated from observations <strong>of</strong> major fold amplitudes in<br />

strike-normal sections reduces from south to north in<br />

strike-normal sections and from west to east in strikeparallel<br />

sections. <strong>The</strong> eastward decrease in basement<br />

thickness explains why Lower Carboniferous and ORS<br />

strata are exposed in the west and Upper Carboniferous in<br />

the east. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Mendip</strong> periclines are asymmetric and verge<br />

northwards, and their periclinal nature is due to <strong>thrust</strong><br />

culminations involving basement at depth. <strong>The</strong>ir overall<br />

en-echelon pattern may be related to the oblique climb <strong>of</strong><br />

two major <strong>thrust</strong>s (T2 and T3) towards the NE, and climb <strong>of</strong><br />

the basal detachment eastwards. <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> exposed<br />

<strong>thrust</strong>s are oblique hangingwall and footwall ramps.<br />

Deformation which took place earlier than the Variscan<br />

<strong>thrust</strong>ing, is observed in the north <strong>of</strong> the area where Upper<br />

Carboniferous Pennant Measures unconformably overlie<br />

previously folded Lower Carboniferous and ORS rocks,<br />

notably along the Lower Severn Axis. Such structures may<br />

be related to major lineaments such as the Malvern Fault<br />

Zone (Kellaway & Hancock 1983) or lesser faults such as<br />

the ‘disturbances’ observed on the north crop <strong>of</strong> the South<br />

Wales Coalfield (Owen 1971, 1983). <strong>The</strong> north-south<br />

trending Coalpit Heath basin and Tortworth inlier are<br />

almost certainly related to major pre-Variscan basement<br />

lineaments. In terms <strong>of</strong> Variscan evolution it is possible that<br />

whilst deformation was beginning in southern Cornwall and<br />

Devon, in late Devonian to early Carboniferous times<br />

(Dearman 1971), basement lineaments crossing the Variscan<br />

<strong>foreland</strong> were activated as sinistral strike-slip faults giving<br />

localized <strong>belt</strong>s <strong>of</strong> deformation, and localized uplift and<br />

subsidence. Piggy-back <strong>thrust</strong>ing migrated northwards<br />

(Shackleton et al. 1982; Coward & Smallwood 1984) and by<br />

latest Carboniferous times the locus <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>ing was in the<br />

<strong>Mendip</strong> area. <strong>The</strong> later, thin skinned <strong>thrust</strong>s cut across and<br />

detached the early basement faults incorporating them into<br />

the <strong>thrust</strong> sheets. <strong>The</strong> strike <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>s T, and T, in the north<br />

<strong>of</strong> the area may well be controlled by earlier, deeper faults<br />

and they have probably undergone both strike-slip and<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> displacements. <strong>The</strong> Variscan ‘front’ is a diffuse zone<br />

in which <strong>thrust</strong>-type deformation dies out. It is likely to be<br />

represented by a blind <strong>thrust</strong> that exists significantly farther<br />

north than the previously suggested position <strong>of</strong> the Variscan<br />

front (Hancock et al. 1983; Chadwick et al. 1984; Shackleton<br />

1984). <strong>The</strong> possibility exists that early basement-controlled<br />

structures such as the Usk and Tortworth inliers, and the<br />

Forest <strong>of</strong> Dean syncline are all underlain by the northward<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> the basal <strong>thrust</strong> represented on<br />

C and D (Figs 6, 7 & 8).<br />

sections A , B,<br />

We would like to thank Paul Hancock for valuable discussion and<br />

our colleagues at Cardiff and Plymouth for the same. Thanks are<br />

also due to G. A. Kellaway for comments on the detailed geology<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong>-<strong>Mendip</strong> area and to Mark Cooper and Ge<strong>of</strong>f Tanner<br />

for critical reviews <strong>of</strong> the manuscript. This paper is dedicated to the<br />

innumerable undergraduates who have ‘done’ the <strong>Bristol</strong> sheet.<br />

References<br />

BRISTOW, H. W. & WOODWARD, H. B. 1871. Remarks on the prospects <strong>of</strong><br />

coal to the south <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mendip</strong>s. Geological Magazine, 8, 500-5.<br />

BUCKLAND, W. & CONYBEARE, W. D. 1924. Observations on the<br />

South-Western coal district <strong>of</strong> England. Tramactions <strong>of</strong> the Geological<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> London, Series 2, 1, 210.<br />

BUTLER, R. W .H. 1982. <strong>The</strong> terminology <strong>of</strong> structures in <strong>thrust</strong> <strong>belt</strong>s. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Structural Geology, 4, 239-46.<br />

CAVE, R. 1963. <strong>Bristol</strong> and South Wales District. Summary Programme <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Geological Survey, United Kingdom, 38-9.<br />

CHADWICK, R. A., KENOLTY, N. & WHITTAKER, A. 1983. Crustal structure<br />

beneath southern England from deep seismic reflection pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Geological Society, London, 140, 893-911.<br />

CHAPMAN, T. 5. & WILLIAMS, G. D. 1984. Displacement-distance methods in<br />

the analysis <strong>of</strong> fold-<strong>thrust</strong> structures and linked fault systems. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

the Geological Society, London, 141, 121-8.<br />

COWARD, M. P. & SMALLWOOD, S. 1984. An interpretation <strong>of</strong> Variscan<br />

tectonics <strong>of</strong> SW England. Special Publication <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society,<br />

London, 14, 89-102.<br />

CURTIS, M. L. K. 1955. Geology: Lower Palaeozoic: In: MACINNES, C. M. &<br />

WHITTARD, W. S. (eds) <strong>Bristol</strong> and its Adjoining Counties. British<br />

Association for the Advancement <strong>of</strong> Science, <strong>Bristol</strong>, 3-9.<br />

DEARMAN, W. R. 1971. A general view <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> Cornubia.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Ussher Society, 2, 221-36.<br />

DE LA BECHE, H. T. 1846. On the formations <strong>of</strong> rocks <strong>of</strong> S. Wales and S.W.<br />

England. Memoirs <strong>of</strong> the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Great Britain.<br />

ELLIOIT, D. 1976. <strong>The</strong> energy balance and deformation mechanisms <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong><br />

sheets. Philosophical Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> London,<br />

A.283,289-312.<br />

- & JOHNSON, M. R. W. 1980. Structural evolution in the northern part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Moine Thrust Zone. Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong>, 71, 69-96.<br />

GODWIN-AUSTEN, R. A. C. 1856. On the possible extension <strong>of</strong> the Coal<br />

Measures beneath the southern part <strong>of</strong> England. Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London, U, 38-46.<br />

GREEN, G. W. & WELCH, F. B. A. 1965. Geology <strong>of</strong> the country around<br />

Wells and Cheddar. Memoirs <strong>of</strong> the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

Kingdom.<br />

GWINN, U. E. 1964. Thin-skinned tectonics in the Plateau and northwestern<br />

Valley and Ridge provinces <strong>of</strong> the Central Appalachians. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Geological Society <strong>of</strong> America, 75, 863-900.<br />

HANCOCK, P. L., DUUNE, W. M. & TINGHAM, M. E. 1983. Variscan<br />

deformation in Southwest Wales. In: HANCOCK, P. L. (ed.) <strong>The</strong> Variscan<br />

Fold Belt in the British Isles. Adam Hilger Ltd., <strong>Bristol</strong> 47-73.<br />

HOSSACK, J. R. 1983. A cross-section through the Scandinavian Caledonides<br />

constructed with the aid <strong>of</strong> branch line maps. Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural<br />

Geology, 5, 103-11.<br />

KELLAWAY, G. A. & WELCH, F. B. A. 1948. <strong>Bristol</strong> and Gloucester district.<br />

British Regional Geology HMSO, London.<br />

- & HANCOCK, P. L. 1983. Structure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong> district, the Forest <strong>of</strong><br />

Dean and the Malvern fault zone. In: HANCOCK, P. L. (ed.) <strong>The</strong> Variscan<br />

Fold Belt in the British Isles. Adam Hilger Ltd., <strong>Bristol</strong>. 88-107.<br />

MCMURTIE, J. 1881. <strong>The</strong> Somersetshire coalfield and method <strong>of</strong> working thin<br />

seams in the Radstock district. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the South Wales Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineers, 12.<br />

OWN, T. R. 1971. <strong>The</strong> structural evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong> Channel.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society, London, 1664, 289-93.<br />

- & WEAVER, J. D. 1983. <strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> the main South Wales coalfield<br />

and its margins. In: HANCOCK, L. P. (ed.) <strong>The</strong> Variscan Fold Belt in the<br />

British Isles. Adam Hilger Ltd., <strong>Bristol</strong>. 74-87.<br />

PRICE, R. A. 1980. <strong>The</strong> Cordilleran <strong>foreland</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> <strong>belt</strong> in the southern<br />

Canadian Rocky Mountains. In: MCCLAY, K. R. & PRICE, N. J. (eds)<br />

Thrust and Nappe Tectonics. Special Publication <strong>of</strong> the Geological<br />

Society, London, 9, 418-27.<br />

RAMSBOTTOM, W. H. L. & MITCHELL, M. 1980. <strong>The</strong> recognition and division<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Tournaisian Series in Britain. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society,<br />

London, W7, 61-3.<br />

REYNOLDS, S. H. & GREENLY, E. 1924. <strong>The</strong> geological structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Clevedon-Portishead ridge. Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Sociery<br />

<strong>of</strong> London, 80, 447-67.<br />

- & VAUGHAN, A. 1911. Fauna1 and lithological sequences in the<br />

Carboniferous Limestone Series <strong>of</strong> Burrington Combe, Somerset.<br />

Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London, 67, 342-92.<br />

RODGERS, J . 1970. <strong>The</strong> Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the Appalachians. Wiley-Interscience,<br />

New York.<br />

SHACKLETON, R. M. 1984. Thin skinned tectonics, basement control and the<br />

Variscan front. In: HUTTON, D. H. W. & SANDERSON, D. J. (eds)<br />

Variscan Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the North Atlantic Region. Special Publication <strong>of</strong>


the Geological Society, London, 14, 125-9.<br />

~ & RIES, A. C. & COWARD, M. P. 1982. An interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Variscan structures in S.W. England. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society,<br />

London, 139, 533-4.<br />

SIBLY, T. F. 1907. On the Carboniferous limestone <strong>of</strong> Burrington Combe.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the British Nature Society, 1, 14-41,<br />

- 1912. <strong>The</strong> faulted inlier <strong>of</strong> Carboniferous limestone at Upper Vobster,<br />

(Somerset). Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London, 68,<br />

58-74.<br />

THOMPSON, R. I . 1980. <strong>The</strong> nature and significance <strong>of</strong> large blind <strong>thrust</strong>s<br />

within the northern Rocky Mountains <strong>of</strong> Canada. In: MACCLAY, K. R. &<br />

PRICE, N. J. (eds) Thrwt and Nappe Tectonics. Special Publication <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Geological Society, London, 9, 449-62.<br />

USHER, W. A. E. 1889. Some points <strong>of</strong> interest in the geology <strong>of</strong> Somerset.<br />

Reprint <strong>of</strong> the Brit&-h Association (Bath), 659.<br />

VAUGHAN, A. 1905. <strong>The</strong> palaeontological sequence in the Carboniferous<br />

Limestone <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bristol</strong> area. Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society<br />

<strong>of</strong> London, 61, 181-307.<br />

BRISTOL-MENDIP<br />

THRUST FORELAND<br />

BELT 73<br />

Received 28 May 1985<br />

WELCH, F. B. A. 1928. <strong>The</strong> geological structure <strong>of</strong> the central <strong>Mendip</strong>s.<br />

Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London, 85, 45-76.<br />

- 1932. <strong>The</strong> geological structure <strong>of</strong> the eastern <strong>Mendip</strong>s. Quarterly Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London, 89, 14-49.<br />

WHITTAKER, A. & GREEN, G. W. 1983. Geology <strong>of</strong> the country around<br />

Weston-Super-Mare. Memoirs <strong>of</strong> the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

Kingdom.<br />

WILLIAMS, G. D. & BROOKS, M. 1985. A reinterpretation <strong>of</strong> the concealed<br />

Variscan structure beneath Southern England by section balancing.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the Geological Society, London, 142, 689-95.<br />

- & CHAPMAN, T. J. 1983. Strains in the hangingwalls <strong>of</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>s due to<br />

their slip/propagation rate: a dislocation model. Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural<br />

Geology, 5, 563-71.<br />

WINWOOD, H. H. 1891. A Rhaetic section at Luckington and additional notes<br />

on the Vobster Quarry. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Bath Natural History Society,<br />

7, 45-9.<br />

WOODWARD, H. B. 1876. <strong>The</strong> east Somerset and <strong>Bristol</strong> Coalfields. Memoirs<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> the United Kingdom.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!