25.04.2013 Views

history of england - OUDL Home

history of england - OUDL Home

history of england - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAP,<br />

I.<br />

10 THE RESTORA TION IN ENGLAND. 1660<br />

large measure <strong>of</strong> ejection and restoration. But the convention<br />

contained many men who had pr<strong>of</strong>ited by the transfers <strong>of</strong><br />

property, and there was an obvious reluctance to inquire too<br />

closely into the titles <strong>of</strong> existing holders. Both in the act <strong>of</strong><br />

indemnity and in a subsequent "act for the confirmation <strong>of</strong><br />

judicial proceedings " an exception was made in favour <strong>of</strong> lands<br />

previously belonging to the king or queen, to the Church, or to<br />

royalists who had suffered actual confiscation. These recovered<br />

their estates, and though it was understood that present occupants<br />

were to receive favourable treatment from the restored<br />

owners, no legal security was given them, and on Church lands<br />

especially they had in many cases to make way for the highest<br />

bidder. But the royalist who had parted with his lands by his<br />

own act, though under practical compulsion, had no remedy<br />

unless he could prove in a law-court some illegality on the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> those concerned in the transaction. And from this he was<br />

in most cases barred by the act <strong>of</strong> indemnity. Such a man<br />

was left with a galling sense <strong>of</strong> wrong, and he was apt to look<br />

upon Clarendon rather than upon parliament as the author <strong>of</strong><br />

the injustice.<br />

There was one expedient <strong>of</strong> the rebels which commended<br />

itself both to king and parliament. Monthly assessments<br />

were necessary to pay the army and navy until their eventual<br />

fate could be determined. The excise upon beer and spirits<br />

was required to furnish the king with an adequate revenue.<br />

The annual sum which the convention was willing to grant<br />

to Charles II. was £1,200,000. This was ,£300,000 more<br />

than the late king was computed to have received from all<br />

sources, and for its payment one half <strong>of</strong> the proceeds <strong>of</strong> the<br />

excise was granted to the king for his life. The other half<br />

was to go to the crown for ever as a commutation <strong>of</strong> the old<br />

feudal incidents. Down to the great rebellion the heir <strong>of</strong> a<br />

tenaht-in-chief had continued to pay a relief as in the days <strong>of</strong><br />

the Normans*and Plantagenets. If the heir were a minor he<br />

was a royal ward, and during his minority the revenue <strong>of</strong><br />

his estates was administered by the court <strong>of</strong> wards for the<br />

crown. The hand <strong>of</strong> an heiress could be disposed <strong>of</strong> at the<br />

will <strong>of</strong> the suzerain. When the king knighted his eldest son<br />

or gave his eldest daughter in marriage, he was entitled to demand<br />

an aid from all tenants by knight-service. These customs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!