27.04.2013 Views

Mass Properties of Sedimentary Rocks and Gravimetric Effects of ...

Mass Properties of Sedimentary Rocks and Gravimetric Effects of ...

Mass Properties of Sedimentary Rocks and Gravimetric Effects of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GRAVIMETRIC EFFECTS OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL-GAS RESERVOIRS A25<br />

· The subsurface gravimetric effects produced in the<br />

regions below a low-density mass are rather like inverse,<br />

or mirror, images across a level surface through<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> those in the regions above it.<br />

At a point immediately beneath the base <strong>of</strong> the lowdensity<br />

mass, the absence <strong>of</strong> that component <strong>of</strong> the upwardly<br />

directed gravitational attraction <strong>of</strong> an equal<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> denser rock (for example, water-saturated<br />

rather than petroleum-bearing s<strong>and</strong>stones) is sensed<br />

by the borehole gravimeter, <strong>and</strong> the measured value<br />

<strong>of</strong> gravity is excessive in proportion to the thickness,<br />

volume, <strong>and</strong> negative density contrast <strong>of</strong> the mass<br />

above. In other words, if a gravity anomaly can be<br />

perceived by surface <strong>and</strong> (or) borehole gravity surveys<br />

above an anomalous density mass, that mass will<br />

produce an anomaly <strong>of</strong> opposite sign in the regions beneath<br />

it unless its effect is compensated by a geologic<br />

correction. The practical significance <strong>of</strong> this fact for<br />

exploration can be visualized by considering qualitatively<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> an undiscovered deeper or flanking<br />

pool on borehole gravity surveys in <strong>and</strong> beneath a<br />

known <strong>and</strong> exploited reservoir. If a positive anomaly<br />

does not occur beneath the known reservoir, or if its<br />

amplitudeis less <strong>and</strong> its shape different from that expected,<br />

a deeper, or flanking, undiscovered reservoir<br />

-can be suspected. Such techniques <strong>of</strong> exploration for<br />

deeper pools <strong>and</strong> undetected small extensions <strong>of</strong> known<br />

pools in oil fields where numerous production wells<br />

provide the access for fairly extensive underground<br />

surveys at several levels are probably the most commercially<br />

significant type <strong>of</strong> inquiry for the borehole<br />

gravimeter in the immediate future.<br />

With such problems in mind, let us examine again<br />

the possible prospecting utility <strong>of</strong> departures from normal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the underground vertical gravity gradient corrected<br />

for AT <strong>and</strong> u. We have seen that in a vertical<br />

borehole drilled above a reservoir, this quantity is relatively<br />

negative <strong>and</strong> is more <strong>and</strong> more negative as the<br />

low-density mass is approached vertically from above.<br />

. As the reservoir is penetrated, the steep gravity gradient<br />

associated with its lower density compensates for<br />

the. accumulative departure from normal <strong>and</strong>, in fact,<br />

overcompensates for it so that beneath the reservoir<br />

the gradient is again abnormally low, becoming more<br />

<strong>and</strong> more normal as measurements are made at still<br />

deeper <strong>and</strong> deeper levels. If these departures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

underground gravity gradients along a vertical line,<br />

or a vertical or horizontal pr<strong>of</strong>ile, could be measured<br />

with a borehole gravimeter or gravity gradiometer, a<br />

very powerful <strong>and</strong> depth-sensitive technique would be<br />

available for prospecting in general, but particularly<br />

for prospecting for deeper pools <strong>and</strong> extensions <strong>of</strong><br />

partly exploited oil fields. Therefore, the factors that<br />

limit ability to apply this technique should be examined.<br />

Figure 13 illustrates graphically that smaller real<br />

values <strong>of</strong> Ag I AZ signify denser rocks than larger values<br />

do. A variation in Ag I tl.Z <strong>of</strong> 0.01 mgal per 1,000 feet<br />

is equivalent to an apparent variation in density <strong>of</strong><br />

0.0004 g per ems over that interval. If a departure<br />

from normal <strong>of</strong> the underground gradient <strong>of</strong> 0.01<br />

1ngal per 1,000 feet is to be detected, therefore, the<br />

density term <strong>of</strong> equation 14 must be known with an<br />

accuracy greater than 0.0004 g per ems; such accurate<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> density in situ are probably not possible<br />

(except by borehole gravimeter measurements<br />

where AOg, the quantity being sought in effect, can be<br />

evaluated with an equally high accuracy). The author<br />

(McCulloh, 1965) has shown that core-sample density<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> compact rocks can be constructed that appear<br />

to be accurate on the average over large depth<br />

ranges to about 0.001 g per ems. This suggests that<br />

departurP.s from normal <strong>of</strong> the underground gravity<br />

gradient begin to enter the range <strong>of</strong> detectability, by<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> accurate core-sample density pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

with pr<strong>of</strong>iles calculated from the abnormal gravity<br />

gradient, when the departure equals or exceeds 0.03<br />

mgal per 1,000 feet. As will be seen in following pages,<br />

a departure from normal calculated for a fairly large<br />

reservoir in the interval from sea level to minus 2,600<br />

feet is only half the value that is the present practical<br />

limiting value, so one can see that this technique has<br />

only limited applications in regions close to small disturbing<br />

masses or more distant from masses <strong>of</strong> large<br />

volume or very large density contrast. Probably the<br />

greatest utility <strong>of</strong> the method again is to be found in<br />

searching for deeper pool extensions or lateral extensions<br />

<strong>of</strong> known traps in already drilled oil fields, <strong>and</strong><br />

in checking the significance in shallow core holes <strong>of</strong><br />

small local surface gravity, minimums that might be<br />

related to shallow reservoirs or to other shallow masses<br />

<strong>of</strong> low density .<br />

HYPOTHETICAL GRAVITY PROFILES CALCULATED<br />

FOR SELECTED WELL-DRILLED OIL FIELDS IN<br />

VENTURA COUNTY, CALIF.<br />

The recognition, almost by chance, that some productive<br />

petroleum <strong>and</strong> natural-gas reservoirs in California<br />

<strong>and</strong> South Dagestan, Azerbaijan, U.S.S.R., are<br />

marked by local small negative gravity anomalies<br />

should probably lead to suitable statistical studies <strong>of</strong><br />

gravity maps <strong>of</strong> those <strong>and</strong> other petroliferous regions<br />

to establish empirical correlations between known reservoirs<br />

<strong>and</strong> observed gravity anomalies. Such studies<br />

. would provide guides to further exploration. Of greater<br />

importance to scientific underst<strong>and</strong>ing, however,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!