28.04.2013 Views

Camera Obscura, Camera Lucida

Camera Obscura, Camera Lucida

Camera Obscura, Camera Lucida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 <strong>Camera</strong> <strong>Obscura</strong>, <strong>Camera</strong> <strong>Lucida</strong><br />

However, this is not the only shape that idealism can take in modernism. Surrealism,<br />

for all is radicalism, constitutes another:<br />

A notion of the ‘noumenal’ persists. Surrealist thinking is haunted by demons and<br />

old ghosts such as a ‘transcendence,’ subjected periodically to rituals of exorcism,<br />

but never quite dispelled. Surrealist ‘immanence’ is, in fact, and more than most, a<br />

‘transcendence’ in disguise... Dedicated to the abolition of Christian myth and its repressive<br />

vestiges, Surrealism derived its strength and its contradictions from that<br />

myth. (BS 73)<br />

There is, however, another, more marginal, secular trend in modernism, exemplified,<br />

perhaps, in the pre-war era by Duchamp’s aesthetic of ambiguity,<br />

which artists of the ’60s such as Morris and Rainer can be seen as extending: ‘It<br />

is, I think, a prime quality of Morris’s work that it offers ... the terms of a sharpened<br />

definition of the nature of the sculptural experience ... in a manner<br />

wholly consistent with a commitment to the secularist impulse and thrust of<br />

modernism’ (RM 23):<br />

There are, in the contemporary renewal of performance modes, two basic and diverging<br />

impulses which shape and animate its major innovations. The first,<br />

grounded in the idealist extensions of a Christian past, is mythopoeic in its aspiration,<br />

eclectic in its forms, and constantly traversed by the dominant and polymorphic<br />

style which constitutes the most tenacious vestige of that past: expressionism.<br />

Its celebrants are: for theater, Artaud, Grotowski; for film Murnau and Brakhage;<br />

and for the dance, Wigman, Graham. The second, consistently secular in its commitment<br />

to objectification, proceeds from Cubism and Constructivism; its modes are<br />

analytic and its spokesmen are: for theater, Meyerhold and Brecht, for film<br />

Eisenstein and Snow, for dance, Cunningham and Rainer. (YR 33)<br />

Rather than attempting to find an aesthetic substitute for lost theological certainties,<br />

‘to dwell in Presence,’ to transcend the limits of everyday, contingent<br />

reality and the way we standardly know it, this trend analyzes and questions<br />

quotidian reality and our ordinary knowledge of it itself. Morris, for example,<br />

rejects the metaphysical ‘virtual space’ of traditional sculpture and focuses on<br />

real space and the spectator’s standard perception of it. In a parallel gesture,<br />

Rainer rejects the metaphysical ‘synthetic time’ of traditional dance in favor of<br />

‘a time that is operational, the time of experience, of our actions in the world’ in<br />

her ‘ordinary language’ dance (YR 58). In this way, modernist art can be seen<br />

as recapitulating the same fissure that exists in Western philosophy between<br />

those who seek new metaphysical certainties beneath or beyond contingent reality<br />

and the way it is normally known (Descartes, Kant, Heidegger), and<br />

those who, rejecting the possibility of (finding) metaphysical certainties, focus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!