28.04.2013 Views

REPRESENTATION ISSUES UNDER THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT

REPRESENTATION ISSUES UNDER THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT

REPRESENTATION ISSUES UNDER THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>REPRESENTATION</strong> <strong>ISSUES</strong> <strong>UNDER</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>RAILWAY</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>ACT</strong><br />

Roland P. Wilder, Jr., Joshua D. McInerney, Katherine A. McDonough<br />

PART I<br />

PRELIMINARY<br />

I. STATUTE: The Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.)<br />

A. GENERAL PURPOSES: § 151 (a)<br />

B. RIGHT TO ORGANIZE: § 152, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth<br />

1. Choice of Representatives: § 152, Third<br />

2. Organization and Collective Bargaining, § 152, Fourth<br />

3. Agreements Not To Join Prohibited: § 152, Fifth<br />

4. Representation Disputes Procedures and the NMB: § 152, Ninth<br />

II. INTERPLAY WITH <strong>THE</strong> NLRA: COMITY AND GUIDANCE BY ANALOGY<br />

A. INTERCHANGE BETWEEN <strong>ACT</strong>S<br />

1. National Mediation Board’s assertions of jurisdiction over employer<br />

activity and employees engaged therein honored by National Labor<br />

Relations Board. Air Cargo Transp., 289 N.L.R.B. 176 (1988); DHL<br />

Corp., 260 N.L.R.B. 17 (1982). See Chicago Truck Drivers v. NMB, 670<br />

F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1982).<br />

2. UPS/FedEx: NLRA or RLA? What is required to be a “Carrier”?<br />

a. Federal Express Corp., 323 N.L.R.B. No. 157 (1997) (Federal<br />

Express trucking employees are not subject to LMRA; NMB has<br />

determined that it has jurisdiction; operation is “integrally related”<br />

to company’s air operations).<br />

b. NLRB properly declined to certify to NMB issue of whether UPS<br />

drivers and package employees were subject to LMRA or RLA.<br />

UPS v. NLRB, 92 F.2d 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1996).<br />

c. NLRB asserts jurisdiction over UPS despite claim it is subject to<br />

jurisdiction of the NMB. UPS of Ohio, 321 N.L.R.B. 300 (1996).


d. NMB declines to assert jurisdiction over sorters and drivers<br />

working for a carrier under a Postal contract with the carrier<br />

where the carrier did not have the authority to “supervise and<br />

direct” the employees. Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc., 28<br />

N.M.B. 216 (2001).<br />

B. EFFECT OF NLRB CERTIFICATION<br />

NLRB certification not binding upon NMB due to the two Acts’ dissimilar<br />

defining characteristics of employee bargaining groups; NLRB certification not<br />

directly transferable to RLA covered carrier. Air Florida, Inc., 7 N.M.B. 261<br />

(1979).<br />

C. APPLICABILITY OF NLRA CASES<br />

“While employers covered by the Railway Labor Act are not subject to the<br />

provisions of the NLRA, the NLRA and cases interpreting it nevertheless provide<br />

some guidance in the interpretation of certain provisions of the Railway Labor<br />

Act.” ALPA v. United Airlines, Inc., 802 F.2d 886, 898 (7th Cir. 1986); Trans<br />

International Airlines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 650 F.2d<br />

949 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1110 (1981). See Brotherhood of<br />

Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 394 U.S. 369, 383, reh. denied,<br />

394 U.S. 1024 (1969); Adams v. Federal Express Corp., 547 F.2d 319 (Cir.<br />

1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 915 (1977), on remand, 470 F. Supp. 1356, 1361<br />

(W.D. Tenn. 1979), aff’d, 654 F.2d 452 (6th Cir. 1981). See also Steele v.<br />

Louisville & N.R.R., 323 U.S. 192, 200-02 (1944); Eastern Airlines, Inc., 9<br />

N.M.B. 285 (1982); Felter v. Southern Pac. Co., 359 U.S. 326, 332 n.10 (1959);<br />

Laker Airways, Ltd., 8 N.M.B. 236 (1981). Cf. Ground Services, Inc. 8 N.M.B.<br />

112 (1980) (joint employer concept adopted).<br />

But see US Airways, Inc., 28 N.M.B. 91 (2000) (RLA and NLRA are different<br />

statutes and no rule requires NMB to accept NLRB policy as dispositive of<br />

disputes under RLA).<br />

III. COVERAGE: JURISDICTION <strong>UNDER</strong> <strong>THE</strong> RLA<br />

A. CARRIERS<br />

1. “Carrier.” Case law defines as a two-part-test: ownership or control and<br />

company’s functions vis-à-vis transportation. Board must apply statutory<br />

test in a rational and reviewable manner. Longshoremen v. NMB, 870<br />

F.2d 733 (D.C. Cir. 1989); Delpro Company v. Railway Carmen, 519 F.<br />

Supp. 842 (D. Del. 1981), aff’d, 676 F.2d 960 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied,<br />

459 U.S. 989 (1983).<br />

2. NMB Decisions:


Holland America Westours, 29 N.M.B. 140 (2002); Trux Transp., Inc.<br />

d/b/a/ Trux Airline Cargo Services, 28 N.M.B. 518 (2001); Aeroground,<br />

Inc., 28 N.M.B. 510 (2001); Globe Aviation Services, 28 N.M.B. 41<br />

(2000); Quality Aircraft Services, 24 N.M.B. 286 (1997); Service Master<br />

Aviation Services, 24 N.M.B. 186 (1997); Welch Aviation, Inc., 21<br />

N.M.B. 329 (1994); TNT Skypak Inc., 20 N.M.B. 153 (1993); Caribbean<br />

Airline Services, Inc., 19 N.M.B. 242 (1992); SAPADO I, (Dobbs<br />

International Services), 18 N.M.B. 525 (1991); Intertec Aviation, L.P., 17<br />

N.M.B. 487 (1990); E.G. & G. Special Projects, Inc., 17 N.M.B. 457<br />

(1990); C.W.S., Inc., 17 N.M.B. 371 (1990); Glenway, Inc., 17 N.M.B.<br />

257 (1990); Sky Valet, 17 N.M.B. 250 (1990); Intermobile Company, 17<br />

N.M.B. 223 (1990); Bankhead Enterprises Inc., 17 N.M.B. 153 (1990);<br />

Pacific Rail Services d/b/a Intermodal Management Services, 16 N.M.B.<br />

468 (1989); Florida Express Carrier, Inc., 16 N.M.B. 407 (1989); Jimsair<br />

Aviation Services, Inc., 15 N.M.B. 25 (1988); Sky Chefs, Inc., 15 N.M.B.<br />

397 (1988); Prospect Airport Services, Inc., 15 N.M.B. 70,72 (1988);<br />

New York Interstate Service, Inc., 14 N.M.B. 439 (1987); Counsel For<br />

Airport Opportunity, 14 N.M.B. 251 (1987); Energy Support Services,<br />

Inc., 14 N.M.B. 326 (1987); Allied Maintenance Corp., 13 N.M.B. 255<br />

(1986); Ohio Barge Line, Inc., 11 N.M.B. 290 (1984); International<br />

Aviation & Travel Academy, 10 N.M.B. 481 (1983); Cybernetics &<br />

Systems, Inc., 10 N.M.B. 108 (1983).<br />

3. Interstate Commerce Act or the Department of Transportation or Federal<br />

Aviation Administration reporting requirements and/or regulation may<br />

affect jurisdiction. Holland America Westours, 29 N.M.B. 140 (2002);<br />

UTDC Transit Services, Inc., 17 N.M.B. 343 (1990); Tri County<br />

Community Rail Organization, 17 N.M.B. 321 (1990). See also SIRTOA<br />

v. ICC, 718 F.2d 533 (2d Cir. 1983). Railway Labor Executives’ Ass’n v.<br />

ICC, 859 F.2d 997 (D.C. Cir. 1988).<br />

4. Successorship or sale of entity may result in change of RLA jurisdiction.<br />

Pan Am World Services, 18 N.M.B. 5 (1990) (no longer “carrier” after<br />

sale by parent company). Sky Valet, 23 N.M.B. 155 (1996) (cleaners at<br />

Logan Airport subject to RLA even though cleaners had previously been<br />

represented by SEIU and covered by NLRA since 1984). Compare Pan<br />

Am World Services v. TWU, No. 85-261-CIV-ORL-18, (M.D. Fla., Mar.<br />

18, 1985) (PAA Corporate reorganization not sufficient to divest court of<br />

RLA jurisdiction).<br />

B. JURISDICTIONAL STANDARDS.<br />

RLA jurisdiction established by: 1) nature of work traditionally performed and 2)<br />

sufficient control. Argenbright Security, Inc., 29 N.M.B. 340 (2002); Argenbright<br />

Security, Inc., 29 N.M.B. 332 (2002); Integrated Airline Security Services, Inc.,<br />

29 N.M.B. 196 (2002); Huntleigh USA Corp., 29 N.M.B. 121 (2001); Trux


Transp., Inc. d/b/a/ Trux Airline Cargo Services, 28 N.M.B. 518 (2001);<br />

Aeroground, Inc., 28 N.M.B. 510 (2001); North American Aviation Service,<br />

PHL, Inc./FDH&W, 28 N.M.B. 155 (2000); Foreign and Domestic Car Service,<br />

Inc., 28 N.M.B. 82 (2000); Globe Aviation Services, 28 N.M.B. 41 (2000);<br />

Dalfort Aerospace, L.P., 27 N.M.B. 196 (2000); Dobbs International Services,<br />

Inc., 27 N.M.B. 537 (2000); Milepost Industries, 27 N.M.B. 362 (2000); Ogden<br />

Aviation Services, 23 N.M.B. 98 (1996); International Total Services, 26 N.M.B.<br />

72 (1998); Quality Aircraft Services, 24 N.M.B. 286 (1997); Federal Express, 23<br />

N.M.B. 32 (1995).<br />

1. Nature of Work: Traditionally Performed Activities:<br />

Taxi and Charter operations:<br />

Rocky Mountain Holdings L.L.C. d/b/a Eagle Airmed of Arizona, 26<br />

N.M.B. 132 (1999); Hansen Flying Service, 24 N.M.B. 15 (1996);<br />

Cardinal Drilling Company, 20 N.M.B. 474 (1993); AMR<br />

Combs-Memphis, Inc., 18 N.M.B. 380 (1991); United Jet Center, 18<br />

N.M.B. 354 (1991); York Aero, Inc., 17 N.M.B. 498 (1990); Eagle<br />

Aviation and Executive Air Terminal, 15 N.M.B. 204 (1988); Jimsair<br />

Aviation Services Inc., 15 N.M.B. 85 (1988); Tri State Aero, Inc., 9<br />

N.M.B. 256 (1982); Elliot Flying Service Inc., 9 N.M.B. 156 (1981).<br />

But see C&E Aero Services, 10 N.M.B. 62 (1982) (Company’s common<br />

carrier activities in interstate commerce (25 flights per year) are sporadic<br />

and negligible).<br />

2. Security Services:<br />

Argenbright Security, Inc., 29 N.M.B. 340 (2002); Huntleigh USA Corp.,<br />

29 N.M.B. 121 (2001); International Total Services, 26 N.M.B. 72<br />

(1998); Ogden Aviation Services, 20 N.M.B. 181 (1993); International<br />

Total Services, 20 N.M.B. 537 (1993); Andy Frain, Inc., 19 N.M.B. 161<br />

(1992); Airport Aviation Services, Inc., 19 N.M.B. 190 (1992); Flight<br />

Terminal Security Co., 16 N.M.B. 387 (1989); Stanley Smith Security, 16<br />

N.M.B. 379 (1989); Olympic Security Services, Inc., 16 N.M.B. 277<br />

(1989); Globe Security Systems Co., 16 N.M.B. 208 (1989) International<br />

Total Services, 16 N.M.B. 44 (1988); New York Interstate Service, Inc.,<br />

14 N.M.B. 439 (1987); Ground Handling, Inc., 13 N.M.B. 116 (1986);<br />

International Total Services, 9 N.M.B. 392 (1982); ARA Environmental<br />

Services, 9 N.M.B. 37 (1981).<br />

3. Refueling Services:<br />

Air BP, A Division of BPOIL, 19 N.M.B. 90 (1991); Airport Aviation<br />

Services, 19 N.M.B. 190 (1992); Mercury Refueling Inc., 9 N.M.B. 451


(1982).<br />

4. Catering:<br />

Nikko Inflight Catering Co., Ltd., 19 N.M.B. 434 (1992); Chelsea<br />

Catering Corp., 19 N.M.B. 301 (1991); SAPADO I, (Dobbs International<br />

Services), 18 N.M.B. 525 (1991); Sky Chefs, Inc., 15 N.M.B. 397 (1988).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!