29.04.2013 Views

THE SORPTION BEHAVIOUR OF CELLULOSE FIBRES - Lenzing

THE SORPTION BEHAVIOUR OF CELLULOSE FIBRES - Lenzing

THE SORPTION BEHAVIOUR OF CELLULOSE FIBRES - Lenzing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14.1%, lyocell 14.6%, viscose 15.1%). Viscose<br />

fibres show the highest water retention value,<br />

lyocell fibres follow. Water retention value of<br />

modal fibres is 15% lower then that of lyocell<br />

fibres and 32% lower then that of viscose fibres.<br />

As shown by the data in Figure 4, the increase in<br />

fibre width after swelling in water is also decreases<br />

from viscose fibres (36.3%) to lyocell<br />

fibres (22.0%) and is considerably smaller in the<br />

case of modal fibres (17.4%). The lowest value<br />

of water adsorption have the natural cellulose<br />

fibres (cotton), whose hydrophilic character increases<br />

from cotton NaOH cleaned to cotton<br />

mercerised.<br />

When considering water sorption, the new lyocell<br />

fibres are similar to the less dense, low crystalline<br />

and least oriented viscose fibres. Water<br />

vapour adsorption, water retention, swelling in<br />

water places lyocell fibres between the viscose<br />

and modal fibres. Contrary to expectations the<br />

sorption phenomena in the aqueous medium are<br />

not in agreement with the basic structural data<br />

i.e. degree of crystallinity and orientation factor<br />

(Table 1). In the case of cellulose fibres the<br />

structure of voids (especially their diameter and<br />

volume, and less inner surface) the fraction and<br />

orientation of amorphous areas are more important<br />

than other structural characteristics. The<br />

ordered regions (crystalline) do not contribute<br />

significantly to the process of water adsorption.<br />

In spite of the highest degree of crystallinity and<br />

orientation, lyocell fibers have excellent sorption<br />

properties, similar to those of viscose fibers due<br />

to their void system and amorphous region.<br />

ζ [mV]<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

-10<br />

-12<br />

-14<br />

-16<br />

Cotton 2% NaOH<br />

Cotton 24% NaOH<br />

Viscose<br />

Lyocell<br />

Modal<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

pH<br />

Figure 5. Zeta potential ζ as a function of the<br />

pH (conc. of electrolyte solution (KCl) = 0,001<br />

mol/l).<br />

32<br />

Differences are also observed regarding the zeta<br />

potential - pH functions (Figure 5), between the<br />

very hydrophilic regenerated and more crystalline<br />

cotton materials. The hydrophobic character<br />

of cotton in comparison to the hydrophilic character<br />

of regenerated fibres, is responsible for<br />

their highest negative surface charge. The highest<br />

negative zeta potential in the alkaline region,<br />

has boiled cotton fibres (ζplateau of Cotton<br />

2%NaOH = app. – 16 mV). The primary wall of<br />

cotton (location of non-cellulose compounds) at<br />

the fibre surfaces is destroyed using NaOH<br />

cleaning, causing higher accessibility of the surface<br />

groups (COOH). If cotton fibres are mercerised<br />

a decrease of ζplateau is observed, because of<br />

changed cellulose structure. The transformation<br />

of cellulose fine structure from cell I to cell II<br />

causes enlargement of the amorphous part of the<br />

fibre, which leads to the higher reactivity of the<br />

cellulose. The ζplateau values of structured cotton<br />

fibres become similar to those of the regenerated<br />

ones (ζplateau of Cotton 24%NaOH = app –10<br />

mV). The degree of swelling is increased by decreased<br />

crystallinity (the crystallinity of Cotton<br />

24%NaOH is reduced from 90% to 77%; according<br />

to iodine adsorption values ([23]). This is an<br />

explanation for the reduction of the ζplateau .<br />

The ζplateau value of modal is app. –9.5 mV, the ζ<br />

plateau of viscose is the smallest (app. –5 mV),<br />

probably due to the distinct reactive groups (OH<br />

and COOH) accessibility, which is determined<br />

by different structure of regenerated fibres ([1],<br />

[2]).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results of the vapour adsorption, water retention<br />

power and swelling of different cellulose<br />

fibres show clear differences between the hydrophilic<br />

(viscos, lyocell) and the hydrophobic fibres<br />

(cotton, cotton-mercerised) which are in<br />

excellent correlation with the – pH function of<br />

cellulose fibres.<br />

The results of fibre reactivity and adsorption<br />

characteristics obtained by conventional methods,<br />

correlate with the electrokinetic character of<br />

materials – the natural fibres are less reactive as<br />

the regenerated one, so the ζmax of cotton is the<br />

highest. The hydrophilicity of cotton is improved<br />

by mercerisation (changed primary structureformation<br />

of cell II structure), but not as high as<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!