29.04.2013 Views

The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected: Explaining ...

The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected: Explaining ...

The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected: Explaining ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Benedetto, Hix / Government Rebels in House of Commons 771<br />

To assess <strong>the</strong> impact of Labour MPs’ policy preferences on <strong>the</strong>ir voting<br />

behavior, Model 2 uses <strong>the</strong> same specification as in Model 1 but with <strong>the</strong><br />

sample of 131 MPs who responded to <strong>the</strong> left-right self-placement question<br />

in <strong>the</strong> survey. <strong>The</strong> results in Model 2 are identical to those in Model 1 for<br />

all <strong>the</strong> main variables.<br />

Model 3 <strong>the</strong>n adds <strong>the</strong> effect of policy preferences. <strong>The</strong> results reveal<br />

that <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r left that a Labour MP is, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r he or she was from<br />

<strong>the</strong> median member of <strong>the</strong> party, <strong>the</strong> more likely he or she was to vote<br />

against <strong>the</strong> government. Also, <strong>the</strong> results for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r variables remain<br />

unchanged after <strong>the</strong> two policy-preference variables are added.<br />

Model 4 <strong>the</strong>n adds <strong>the</strong> three interaction terms, <strong>and</strong> as a robustness check,<br />

Model 5 replicates Model 4 using a Poisson regression model, in which <strong>the</strong><br />

dependent variable is <strong>the</strong> number of times that a Labour MP voted against<br />

<strong>the</strong> government. <strong>The</strong> results are almost identical in <strong>the</strong>se two models.<br />

Interpreting <strong>the</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong> variables <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong><br />

effects in <strong>the</strong>se last two models is not straightforward because of <strong>the</strong> inclusion<br />

of <strong>the</strong> interaction terms (e.g., Braumoeller, 2004). Hence, to investigate<br />

<strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>and</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong> effects, Figures 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 show <strong>the</strong> predicted<br />

relationships between <strong>the</strong> preferences of an MP, his or her office<br />

status or constituency situation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> likelihood that he or she will rebel.<br />

Figure 2 shows that former ministers with centrist preferences did rebel<br />

slightly more than o<strong>the</strong>r Labour MPs, although <strong>the</strong>re are insufficient former<br />

ministers with outlying preferences to tell <strong>the</strong> difference between former ministers<br />

<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Labour MPs at <strong>the</strong>se positions on <strong>the</strong> left-right scale. Also, backbenchers<br />

who have not been promoted were only different from o<strong>the</strong>r Labour<br />

MPs <strong>and</strong> former ministers if <strong>the</strong>y were considerably to <strong>the</strong> left of <strong>the</strong> average<br />

Labour MP. Figure 3, meanwhile, shows that Labour MPs in marginal seats<br />

were more loyal than were Labour MPs in safe seats, even if <strong>the</strong>y had preferences<br />

considerably to <strong>the</strong> left or to <strong>the</strong> right of <strong>the</strong> average Labour MP.<br />

Rebellions on <strong>the</strong> Iraq War,<br />

Hospital Reform, <strong>and</strong> University Fees<br />

Table 3 presents <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> analysis of <strong>the</strong> three individual votes.<br />

No single set of factors explains Labour rebellions in <strong>the</strong>se votes. In all<br />

three votes, not-promoted MPs <strong>and</strong> former ministers were more likely to<br />

rebel than o<strong>the</strong>r MPs. Also, <strong>the</strong> policy preferences of Labour MPs, as<br />

measured by <strong>the</strong>ir left-right self-placement, mattered in all three votes, but<br />

in slightly different ways. Right-wing MPs were less likely to vote against<br />

Downloaded from<br />

http://cps.sagepub.com at SWETS WISE ONLINE CONTENT on July 6, 2007<br />

© 2007 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized<br />

distribution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!