30.04.2013 Views

Download pdf file - Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy

Download pdf file - Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy

Download pdf file - Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feringer Notes - CIRCULATION OF THOUGHT - 1954 54 of 65<br />

1.The academic cycle is analogous to the natural science cycle, the reverse of a cycle that would<br />

establish a viable social life.It investigates things first, then man, then a purpose for our lives.<br />

ERH asks, "What is wrong with being objective? THE ANSWER IS, IT CAN ONLY APPLY IN<br />

A PERIPHERAL WAY TO UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL LIFE. The fact is,we all want to be<br />

judged by the circumstances surrounding our actions, and therefore, to be judged subjectively.<br />

We wish people to make exceptions for us!ERH quotes Shakespeare, "treat everybody according<br />

to his merit, and nobody is safe," and concludes:<br />

...objectivity means to treat everybody as a thing.(p.2)<br />

Of course objectivity has its place because we must have competence in important positions, but<br />

it must be merged with other considerations.<br />

Academic science tries to transform everything into a thing. p.6<br />

2.ERH tells us that suicide means treating ourselves as "things.""Suffering is no reason to take<br />

your life; and joy is no reason to stay in life." (p.3)Otherwise there would be no basis for asking<br />

soldiers to be ready to die for their country, or anyone else to sacrifice for the community, for that<br />

matter.<br />

He points out that, logically, if one believes in the right to judge the world objectively, there is no<br />

reason not to pollute, or set off the bomb.<br />

I have neither the right to blow up created matter, nor have I right to blow up myself. (p.5)<br />

3.It is philosophy that asserts that we rule the world because it believes in the dominance of the<br />

mind. Therefore, the philosopher asserts, we have the power to make these types of unlimited<br />

decisions.<br />

4.The academic community of social scientists tries to turn everybody into a thing and be<br />

objective about it.They call all parts of the universe "natural." But the natural world is constantly<br />

at war.All animal societies are at war.And because human beings are still thought of as the same<br />

(especially minorities), human society has been unceasingly at war. The natural animal world has<br />

no other direction but conflict, and inanimate elements have no direction except the mercy of<br />

other forces of nature.<br />

5.No vital society has ever been created with this type of logic. A fruitful alternative is to view<br />

society as having some direction toward peace, peace in an environment of justice.Objectivity is<br />

when everyone tries to manipulate everyone else - operating between the sexes, social classes,<br />

races, power centers, etc. This prevailing attitude is actually pre-Christian!(p.8)<br />

6.To speak of the scientific attitude leads us also intofactoring (categorizing),finding the common<br />

denominator of people as a basis for thinking of groups;e.g. by age, or socio-economics, or<br />

values. This is called the "naturalistic" method of social scientific thinking. Churches, ERH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!