Irregularity in public procurement, Tarja Richards ... - Interact

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Type of irregularity 2/3 in public tenders above (or below) the treshold of EU Directive Additional services commanded, exceeding by > 50% the value of the contract – 100% of the amount exceeding 50% of the value of the original contract Reduction of commanded services without reducing the price of the tender –25% of the final value of the contract Unlawful negociation during the award process - - 25% + ToR contents not clear enough to identify services asked for Type of irregularity 3/3 in public tenders above (or below) the treshold of EU Directive Conformity of the award criteria: Award criteria not published Unlawful (discriminatory) award criteria Too spesific criteria (exclusive) = 25% + Real award criteria not corresponding what has been published in the tender or not all criteria used + ‘Slicing’ a bigger tender to smaller contracts to avoid public procurement procedures 2
Overall principals of public procurement Equal treatment Transparency Competition (= accessibility of publicity, absence of favouritism, same procedure for all ) Traceability + value for public money (efficiency, lowest cost for similar quality) When irregularities are found Case-by case analysis Does the irregularity bring real consequences to the result of the tender? Is it possible to identify the exact value of the irregularity? Gravity of the irregularity = % of the funding to be recovered 3
Page 1: Irregularity in public procurement
Page 5 and 6: Systemic or ponctual errors? -MED p
Page 7 and 8: Irregularities in public tenders ME

Irregularity in public procurement, Tarja Richards ... - Interact

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?