06.05.2013 Views

Spring 2002 - The University of Texas at Austin

Spring 2002 - The University of Texas at Austin

Spring 2002 - The University of Texas at Austin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F A C U L T Y<br />

F O C U S<br />

AR IS A CONDITION<br />

<strong>of</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e, not a<br />

p<strong>at</strong>hology th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

with proper hygiene<br />

and tre<strong>at</strong>ment, can be prevented.<br />

In th<strong>at</strong> regard, it is like de<strong>at</strong>h,<br />

which, while it can be postponed, will<br />

come when it will come and cannot be<br />

finally avoided. It is also like de<strong>at</strong>h in<br />

14 UTLAW <strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2002</strong><br />

Philip<br />

Bobbitt<br />

Bobbitt served on the U.S. N<strong>at</strong>ional Security Council from 1997-99; from ’98 he was a senior director.<br />

W<br />

th<strong>at</strong> its modality can <strong>of</strong>ten be chosen.<br />

<strong>The</strong> September <strong>at</strong>tacks on the<br />

United St<strong>at</strong>es provide this country<br />

and its allies with an historic opportunity,<br />

even while they have dealt<br />

America an historic wound. Th<strong>at</strong><br />

opportunity is the context within<br />

which to organize a grand coalition<br />

<strong>of</strong> st<strong>at</strong>es, with many <strong>of</strong> whose policies<br />

THE INDIAN SUMMER<br />

Last autumn’s onslaughts<br />

herald further savagery and cre<strong>at</strong>e<br />

an historic opportunity.<br />

other than counterterrorism<br />

the U.S. has little in<br />

common. Such coalitions,<br />

whose precise composition<br />

will shift from time<br />

to time and thre<strong>at</strong> to<br />

thre<strong>at</strong>, can be cre<strong>at</strong>ed and<br />

managed to fight a new<br />

epochal war composed <strong>of</strong><br />

interventions against a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> challenges th<strong>at</strong><br />

include terrorism—both<br />

within the St<strong>at</strong>e, as in the<br />

example <strong>of</strong> Serbia, and<br />

against a St<strong>at</strong>e, as in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the September<br />

<strong>at</strong>tacks on the United<br />

St<strong>at</strong>es, and even by one<br />

“rogue” or outlying st<strong>at</strong>e<br />

against its neighbor, as in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> Iraq’s aggression<br />

toward Iran and<br />

Kuwait or Serbia’s aggression<br />

against Bosnia.<br />

<strong>The</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es, <strong>at</strong><br />

the time <strong>of</strong> the assaults,<br />

had recently <strong>at</strong>tempted in<br />

the aborted Marshall Report to confront<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> is sometimes called in<br />

the “ABC Problem.” Very roughly,<br />

this problem consists <strong>of</strong> three choices:<br />

whether to configure American<br />

forces to meet challenges from peer<br />

competitors (the “A” list) through<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> high technology, including<br />

missile defenses, and on through<br />

PHOTOGRAPH BY KENNY BRAUN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!