Musiek - APD
Musiek - APD
Musiek - APD
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Denmark II
D I I D Training<br />
Dichotic Interaural Intensity Difference<br />
Training
LE Deficits for Dichotic Listening in Children<br />
(% of cases)<br />
Digits C. Sentence LPFS<br />
R > L = 76.2 % 89 % 45.8 %<br />
L > R = 14.3 % 0 % 37.5 %<br />
R = L = 10.5 % 11 % 16.7 %<br />
** R > L = 23.8 % 51.9 % 4 %<br />
** = > 20%<br />
[<strong>Musiek</strong>]
LE dichotic deficits<br />
• Right hemisphere dysfunction<br />
• Callosal dysfunction
HISTORY: Dichotic Interaural Intensity Studies<br />
<strong>Musiek</strong>, 1979<br />
Pinheiro, <strong>Musiek</strong>, 1982<br />
Katz et al., 1984<br />
Bergman et al., 1989<br />
<strong>Musiek</strong> et al., 1998
Dichotic Interaural Intensity Difference Training<br />
=<br />
DIID
D I I D<br />
L E = 32% RE = 92%<br />
50 dB HL = 32% 50 dB HL = 92%<br />
50 dB HL = 40% 43 dB HL = 86%<br />
50 dB HL = 64% 36 dB HL = 60 %<br />
50 dB HL = 80% 29 dB HL = 46%<br />
[<strong>Musiek</strong>]<br />
crossover
D I I D<br />
L E = 32% TRAINING RE = 92%<br />
50 dB HL = 88% 50 dB HL = 92%<br />
50 dB HL = 86% 43 dB HL = 84%<br />
50 dB HL = 88% 36 dB HL = 60 %<br />
50 dB HL = 88% 29 dB HL = 46%<br />
[<strong>Musiek</strong>]<br />
1–5 dB
D I I D<br />
TRAINING<br />
CONDITIONS<br />
1. UNDER EARPHONES<br />
2. SOUND FIELD
D I I D MATERIALS<br />
WORDS, SENTENCES, CVs, VCs, CVCs,<br />
VCVs, NUMBERS<br />
[IN LIKE AND UNLIKE COMBINATIONS]
D I I D TASKS<br />
1. Binaural separation/integration<br />
-directed/free recall<br />
2.Analysis of ear directed targets)<br />
-place, time, kind, word, etc.<br />
3.Ear directed judgments<br />
-intensity, clarity etc.<br />
4.Cross modality<br />
-auditory-tactile
%<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
D.Digits F. Patt. LPFS C. Sent. D. Rym.<br />
LE RE<br />
O<br />
X<br />
LE RE LE RE LE RE LE RE LE RE<br />
O<br />
O<br />
s<br />
X<br />
DIID TRAINING<br />
Normal Range for Adults<br />
O<br />
O=right<br />
X=left<br />
X<br />
X<br />
O<br />
=right retest<br />
=left retest<br />
SSW<br />
X<br />
13 Y.O<br />
auditory &<br />
academic<br />
difficulties<br />
CaseZAM
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Prelim. Data<br />
Mean % Dichotic Improvement from DIID Training<br />
#1<br />
#2<br />
#1<br />
#1<br />
#1 = <strong>Musiek</strong><br />
Digits Digits C. Sent. Digits - Control<br />
N=29 N=8 N=21 N=7<br />
#2= Wertz, Moncrieff,<br />
<strong>Musiek</strong><br />
{ 30 min/3<br />
times/wk/4wks}<br />
= LE<br />
= RE
5<br />
5.0<br />
4<br />
4.0<br />
3<br />
3.0<br />
2<br />
2.0<br />
1<br />
1.0<br />
0<br />
0.0<br />
Mean Com – Ed Questionaire Scores – C. Lau<br />
Li steni ng Di r ections Comm Acad Imp Repeat Under stand Attention Noi se Al er tness Hear i ng<br />
0 = no improvement, 5= no problem
(<strong>Musiek</strong>)<br />
RH<br />
CC<br />
LH<br />
RE LE<br />
(dog) (cat)<br />
Dichotic Listening Function,<br />
Pre Training
(<strong>Musiek</strong>)<br />
RH<br />
CC<br />
LH<br />
RE LE<br />
(dog) (cat)<br />
Dichotic Listening Function,<br />
Post Training