entire issue. - The Royal New Zealand College of General ...
entire issue. - The Royal New Zealand College of General ...
entire issue. - The Royal New Zealand College of General ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
‘It is possible that<br />
the knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainty might set<br />
patients free to choose,<br />
but it won’t set them<br />
free from fear.’<br />
See Ethics page 71<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MaRch 2009<br />
Guest Editorial<br />
A primary care–led medical<br />
education system?<br />
See page 5<br />
Back to Back<br />
GPs should prescribe more<br />
benzodiazepines for the elderly<br />
See page 57<br />
Original Scientific Paper<br />
Depression in Maori<br />
See page 26<br />
Original Scientific Paper<br />
Managing cardiovascular risk in mental<br />
health patients<br />
See page 11<br />
Original Scientific Paper<br />
NZ Samoans’ understanding and use<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibiotics<br />
See page 30<br />
Improving Performance<br />
A patient-centred pathway for lifestyle<br />
and mental health problems<br />
See page 50
OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2 Editorials<br />
From the Editor<br />
2 Simple, fresh, tasty and local<br />
Felicity Goodyear-Smith<br />
Guest Editorials<br />
5 A primary care–led medical education system?<br />
Peter Crampton<br />
6 Using psychoactive medication to intervene in children’s<br />
behaviour: An evidence-based practice?<br />
Barry Parsonson<br />
11 Original scientific Papers<br />
Quantitative Research<br />
11 Cardiovascular risk assessment and management in mental<br />
health clients: Perceptions <strong>of</strong> mental health and general<br />
practitioners in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Amanda Wheeler, Jeff Harrison, Zara Homes<br />
20 Prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne and its impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> life in<br />
school-aged adolescents in Malaysia<br />
Arshad Hanisah, Khairani Omar, Shamsul Azhar Shah<br />
26 <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression among Maori patients in<br />
Auckland general practice<br />
Bruce Arroll, Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Ngaire Kerse et al.<br />
Mixed Method Research<br />
30 Understanding and use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics amongst Samoan<br />
people in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Pauline Norris, Marianna Churchward, Fuafiva Fa’alau et al.<br />
Systematic Reviews<br />
36 Summary <strong>of</strong> an evidence-based guideline on s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong><br />
shoulder injuries and related disorders—Part 1: Assessment<br />
Gillian Robb, Bruce Arroll, Duncan Reid et al.<br />
42 Summary <strong>of</strong> an evidence-based guideline on s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong><br />
shoulder injuries and related disorders—Part 2: Management<br />
Gillian Robb, Bruce Arroll, Duncan Reid et al.<br />
50 Improving Performance<br />
A patient-centred referral pathway for mild to moderate<br />
lifestyle and mental health problems: Does this model work<br />
in practice?<br />
Jill Calveley, Angela Verhoeven, David Hopcr<strong>of</strong>t<br />
57 Back to Back<br />
GPs should prescribe more benzodiazepines for the elderly<br />
Yes Bruce Arroll; No Ngaire Kerse<br />
61 Continuing Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development<br />
61 POEMS: Patient Oriented Evidence that Matters<br />
62 String <strong>of</strong> PEaRLS<br />
COnTEnTs<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MaRch 2009<br />
issn 1172-6164 (Print)<br />
issn 1172-6156 (Online)<br />
62 cochrane corner: Benzodiazepines may hasten improvement<br />
in major depression for up to six weeks<br />
Bruce Arroll<br />
63 Pounamu: Bridging two worlds in the interview process<br />
—the psychiatric assessment and Maori in primary care<br />
Pamela Ara Bennett<br />
65 charms & harms: St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum)<br />
Joanne Barnes<br />
66 Resource Summary: Destination: Recovery<br />
Te Unga Ki Uta:Te Oranga; Future responses to mental<br />
distress and loss <strong>of</strong> well-being—discussion paper from the<br />
Mental Health Advocacy Coalition<br />
Helen Rodenburg<br />
67 Practical Pointers: Effective communication strategies to<br />
enhance patient self-care<br />
Fiona Moir, Renske van den Brink, Richard Fox et al.<br />
71 Ethics<br />
Uncertainty, fear and whistling happy tunes<br />
Katherine Wallis<br />
74 Essays<br />
74 Sub-threshold mental health syndromes: Finding an<br />
alternative to the medication <strong>of</strong> unhappiness<br />
Fiona Mathieson, Sunny Collings, Anthony Dowell<br />
77 Mind over matter—implications for general practice<br />
Andrew Corin<br />
80 Letters to the Editor<br />
82 Book Reviews<br />
82 <strong>The</strong> Baby Business: What’s happened to maternity care in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>—Lynda Exton<br />
Reviewers: William Fergusson and Joan Carll<br />
83 <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Pregnancy Book: A guide to pregnancy, birth<br />
and a baby’s first three months<br />
3rd ed.—Sue Pullon and Cheryl Benn<br />
Reviewers: Jon Wilcox and Helen Ride<br />
84 Ideological Debates in Family Medicine<br />
—Stephen Buetow and Tim Kenealy<br />
Reviewer: Marjan Kljakovic<br />
85 Integrating mental health into primary care:<br />
A global perspective<br />
86 Gems <strong>of</strong> nZ Primary Health Care Research<br />
88 About the Journal <strong>of</strong> Primary Health Care<br />
VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE 1
EDITORIALs<br />
FROM THE EDiTOR<br />
Felicity Goodyear-<br />
Smith MBChB MGP<br />
FRnZCGP, Editor<br />
CORREsPOnDEnCE TO:<br />
Felicity Goodyear-smith<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice and Primary<br />
Health Care, Faculty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medical and Health<br />
sciences, <strong>The</strong> University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Auckland, PB 92109,<br />
Auckland, new <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
f.goodyear-smith@<br />
auckland.ac.nz<br />
simple, fresh, tasty and local<br />
campbell Murdoch rightfully mourns the<br />
passing <strong>of</strong> the NZFP. Although he suspects<br />
foul play, hers was not an untimely<br />
death. 1 While we may grieve her loss, we can<br />
also welcome the Journal <strong>of</strong> Primary Health Care<br />
(JPHC), whose time has come. Like Campbell, I<br />
remember nostalgically when, as a GP, I was ‘a<br />
clinician, physician, [minor] surgeon, obstetrician<br />
and paediatrician’. My work day routinely<br />
included family planning, palliative care, ‘VD’<br />
(now called sexual health), numerous cervical<br />
smears and dealing with patients with addictions.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were also opportunities when my resuscitation<br />
skills were required, and I was frequently up<br />
all night attending patients in their homes when<br />
I was on-call. Except possibly for a few rural colleagues,<br />
those days have passed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> content <strong>of</strong> general practice has fragmented,<br />
with roles played not only by other doctors,<br />
but also by colleagues from other disciplines,<br />
including nursing and pharmacy. <strong>The</strong> Primary<br />
Health Care Strategy was introduced in 2001. 2<br />
Its mission was to shift from traditional general<br />
practice to ‘a new direction for primary health<br />
care with a greater emphasis on population health<br />
and the role <strong>of</strong> the community, health promotion<br />
and preventive care, the need to involve a range<br />
<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals’. This is the model under which<br />
now we work. What still requires greater clarity<br />
is the role <strong>of</strong> these different pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, how<br />
they work together and how care is integrated.<br />
Campbell is right—we still need our own doctor.<br />
GPs are pivotal to health care. We know our patients<br />
and their families. <strong>The</strong> relationship is the<br />
key. We need communication and integration—<br />
to be informed if our patients are on the pill,<br />
pregnant, taking complementary and alternative<br />
medicines, receiving methadone maintenance<br />
therapy, in the hospice for respite care.<br />
<strong>The</strong> final <strong>issue</strong> <strong>of</strong> NZFP included editorials from<br />
its distinguished line-up <strong>of</strong> previous editors<br />
with advice and support to me as the incoming<br />
editor <strong>of</strong> the new journal. Rae West can be<br />
reassured that the JPHC remains the academic<br />
publication <strong>of</strong> the RNZCGP, ‘by and for doctors’,<br />
3 although with considerable contribution<br />
from colleagues from numerous other disciplines,<br />
and <strong>of</strong> significant relevance and interest<br />
to their practices.<br />
JPHC aims both to move research into practice<br />
and practice into research. Latest evidence is<br />
provided in a distilled form for rapid and easy<br />
assimilation by busy practitioners. <strong>The</strong>se will<br />
be pithy and succinct, hopefully avoiding one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the challenges articulated by Ian St George,<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘information smothering’. 4 As well as the<br />
POEMs (‘Patient Oriented Evidence that Matters’)<br />
lauded by Rae, 3 you will find the Cochrane<br />
Corner, a String <strong>of</strong> PEARLS (‘Practical Evidence<br />
About Real Life Situations’), Gems (short précis)<br />
<strong>of</strong> NZ Primary Health Care Research, Charms and<br />
Harms (evidence on the effectiveness and safety<br />
<strong>of</strong> herbal and other complementary remedies),<br />
Pounamu (precious Maori research, essays and<br />
items for practitioners) and brief synopses <strong>of</strong><br />
guidelines and bulletins.<br />
This first <strong>issue</strong> focuses on mental health. Many<br />
<strong>of</strong> the contributions are by GPs. Bruce Arroll and<br />
Ngaire Kerse go Back to Back on giving benzodiazepines<br />
to the elderly. 5 Katherine Wallis, our<br />
guest ethicist, writes elegantly about the possible<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the knowledge <strong>of</strong> uncertainty. 6 Fiona<br />
Moir, Richard Fox, Renske van den Brink and<br />
Susan Hawken discuss communication strategies<br />
to enhance patient self-care. 7 Helen Rodenberg<br />
presents a discussion paper on responses to mental<br />
distress and loss <strong>of</strong> well-being; Andrew Corin<br />
ponders on mind over matter. 8<br />
This <strong>issue</strong> also contains valuable contributions<br />
from a diverse range <strong>of</strong> other disciplines, including<br />
pharmacy, public health, physiotherapy,<br />
psychology, psychiatry, nursing and midwifery.<br />
2 VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE
Our Pounamu (Maori primary health care<br />
treasure) this month is provided by psychiatrist<br />
Pamela Bennett, who discusses how to bridge<br />
the Maori and Pakeha worlds when assessing and<br />
managing Maori with psychiatric illness. 9<br />
Read the challenge <strong>issue</strong>d by our editorial board<br />
member Peter Crampton, public health physician<br />
and Dean <strong>of</strong> the Wellington School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />
on a primary care–led medical education system, 10<br />
and the thought-provoking article by another<br />
board member, psychologist Barry Parsonson, on<br />
whether giving psychoactive drugs to control children’s<br />
behaviour is evidence-based. 11 Psychologist<br />
Fiona Mathieson and psychiatrist Sunny Collings,<br />
joined by Tony Dowell (GP and editorial board<br />
member), consider ultra-brief interventions as<br />
alternatives to drugs in treating unhappiness. 12<br />
PHO initiative she championed to provide an<br />
intervention pathway for patients with mild and<br />
moderate mental health and lifestyle problems. 15<br />
Sadly, Jill died suddenly and unexpectedly in<br />
December. Her paper was under revision and we<br />
have published her final version as she left it.<br />
Amanda Wheeler et al. explore the challenge <strong>of</strong><br />
assessing and managing cardiovascular risk in<br />
patients with mental health problems and the difficulties<br />
<strong>of</strong> the primary/secondary care interface. 16<br />
A study finds that facial acne has a significant<br />
emotional and social impact on Malaysian high<br />
school students, and is likely to be generalisable<br />
to our NZ adolescents. 17<br />
A study on Samoan perception <strong>of</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
antibiotics reveals just how important communi-<br />
<strong>The</strong> content <strong>of</strong> general practice has fragmented, with roles played<br />
not only by other doctors, but also by colleagues from other<br />
disciplines, including nursing and pharmacy… What still requires<br />
greater clarity is the role <strong>of</strong> these different pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, how they<br />
work together and how care is integrated.<br />
Moving practice into research requires collaboration.<br />
Guest editor <strong>of</strong> the final NZFP, Susan<br />
Dovey, expressed concerns ‘about leaving research<br />
to university-based researchers’. 13 Just as today’s<br />
GPs do not practise in isolation, so too they<br />
cannot be expected to conduct research on their<br />
own. Preparing research proposals and ethics<br />
applications and following proscribed protocols<br />
for specific methodologies takes both time and<br />
expertise. JPHC will regularly publish studies<br />
conducted by GPs and other primary health care<br />
practitioners under the mentorship and support<br />
<strong>of</strong> their university colleagues.<br />
<strong>The</strong> original studies in this <strong>issue</strong> are diverse, but<br />
all address practical <strong>issue</strong>s for practitioners on<br />
the ground. Bruce Arroll and colleagues present<br />
results from a large study on the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
depression in Maori. 14 Jill Calveley describes the<br />
cation with our patients is, and that it cannot be<br />
assumed that patients share a Western scientific<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> what antibiotics are or do. 18<br />
Finally, on a very practical level, the systematic<br />
reviews <strong>of</strong> shoulder injury assessment 19 and<br />
management 20 provide summary tips on diagnosis<br />
and treatment.<br />
Campbell Murdoch points out that NZ leads<br />
the world in general practice and primary health<br />
care publications per head <strong>of</strong> population, 1 which<br />
are now accessible to you in our Gems section. A<br />
surprising number <strong>of</strong> NZ books <strong>of</strong> interest and<br />
relevance to family medicine are also published,<br />
which are critiqued by local reviewers.<br />
JPHC provides a forum for discussion and debate.<br />
As well as Back to Back, essays, the guest Ethics<br />
column and editorials, we welcome letters to the<br />
EDITORIALs<br />
FROM THE EDiTOR<br />
VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE 3
EDITORIALs<br />
FROM THE EDiTOR<br />
editor. <strong>The</strong> electronic version <strong>of</strong> JPHC is available<br />
free; we aim to publish ‘in press’ papers online<br />
prior to release <strong>of</strong> the hard copy, and electronic<br />
discussion will come as soon as the IT capacity is<br />
available.<br />
<strong>The</strong> mission for JPHC reflects that <strong>of</strong> NZFP—publish<br />
original relevant research, provide educational<br />
updates, stimulate critical thinking and debate and<br />
reflect on changes in modern general practice. 21<br />
<strong>The</strong> mission for JPhc reflects that <strong>of</strong><br />
NZFP—publish original relevant research,<br />
provide educational updates, stimulate<br />
critical thinking and debate and reflect on<br />
changes in modern general practice<br />
To follow through on Ian St George’s culinary<br />
metaphor, 4 JPHC <strong>of</strong>fers a smörgåsbord <strong>of</strong> wholesome<br />
dishes. Continuing pr<strong>of</strong>essional education is<br />
served as simple, fresh and local morsels. Essays<br />
and editorials <strong>of</strong>fer more meaty fare—tasty but<br />
easily digestible. Original scientific papers have<br />
pride <strong>of</strong> place at every table, presented in a palatable<br />
fashion. Readers either may merely pick at the<br />
abstract and summary box, or devour the studies<br />
in their <strong>entire</strong>ty.<br />
You may choose to graze from time to time or to<br />
sit down for the full meal. Either way, I wish you<br />
bon appétit.<br />
References<br />
1. Murdoch C. What’s in a name? nZ Fam Physician<br />
2008;35(6):12–15.<br />
2. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. <strong>The</strong> Primary Health Care strategy. Wellington;<br />
2001 Feb.<br />
3. West R. Regarding my editorship. nZ Fam Physician<br />
2008;35(6):7–8.<br />
4. st George i. A bright future for the journal. nZ Fam Physician<br />
2008;35(6):5–6.<br />
5. Arroll B, Kerse n. Back to Back: GPs should prescribe more<br />
benzodiazepines for the elderly. J Primary Health Care<br />
2009;1(1):57–60.<br />
6. Wallis K. Uncertainty, fear and whistling happy tunes. J<br />
Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):71–73.<br />
7. Moir F, van den Brink R, Fox R, Hawken s. Effective communication<br />
strategies to enhance patient self-care. J Primary Health<br />
Care 2009;1(1):67–70.<br />
8. Corin A. Mind over matter—implications for general practice.<br />
J Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):77–79.<br />
9. Bennett P. Bridging two worlds in the interview process—the<br />
psychiatric assessment and Maori in primary care. J Primary<br />
Health Care 2009;1(1):63–65.<br />
10. Crampton P. A primary care-led medical education system? J<br />
Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):5–6.<br />
11. Parsonson B. Using psychoactive medication to intervene in<br />
children’s behaviour: An evidence-based practice? J Primary<br />
Health Care 2009;1(1):6–10.<br />
12. Mathieson F, Collings s, Dowell A. sub-threshold mental<br />
health syndromes: Finding an alternative to the medication <strong>of</strong><br />
unhappiness. J Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):74–77.<br />
13. Dovey s. Transitions. nZ Fam Physician 2008;35(6).<br />
14. Arroll B, Goodyear-smith F, Kerse n, Hwang M, Crengle s,<br />
Gunn J, et al. <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression among Maori<br />
patients in Auckland general practice. J Primary Health Care<br />
2009;1(1):26–29.<br />
15. Calveley J, Verhoeven A, Hopcr<strong>of</strong>t D. A patient-centred referral<br />
pathway for mild to moderate lifestyle and mental health<br />
problems: does this model work in practice? J Primary Health<br />
Care 2009;1(1):50–56.<br />
16. Wheeler A, Harrison J, Homes Z. Cardiovascular risk assessment<br />
and management in mental health clients: perceptions<br />
<strong>of</strong> mental health and general practitioners in new <strong>Zealand</strong>. J<br />
Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):11–19.<br />
17. Hanisah A, Khairani Os, A. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne and its impact<br />
on the quality <strong>of</strong> life in school-aged adolescents in Malaysia. J<br />
Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):20–25.<br />
18. norris P, Churchward M, Fa’alau F, Va’ai C. Understanding and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics amongst samoan people in new <strong>Zealand</strong> J<br />
Primary Health Care 2009;1(1):30–35.<br />
19. Robb G, Arroll B, Reid D, Goodyear-smith F. summary <strong>of</strong> an<br />
evidence-based guideline on s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and<br />
related disorders—Part 1: Assessment. J Primary Health Care.<br />
2009;1(1):36–41.<br />
20. Robb G, Arroll B, Reid D, Goodyear-smith F. summary <strong>of</strong> an<br />
evidence-based guideline on s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and<br />
related disorders—Part 2: Management. J Primary Health<br />
Care 2009;1(1):42–49.<br />
21. Townsend T. Editing the nZFP. nZ Fam Physician.<br />
2008;35(6):16–18.<br />
4 VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE
A primary care–led medical<br />
education system?<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary health care sector is an underutilised<br />
resource for medical education.<br />
<strong>The</strong> combined forces <strong>of</strong> ageing demographics,<br />
advances in community-based medical<br />
treatments for chronic diseases, a commitment<br />
to reducing health inequalities, and cost pressures<br />
increasingly conspire to push health care<br />
into primary care settings. Medical education<br />
must mirror this trend—if for no other reason<br />
than the practical imperative that medical<br />
education needs to occur where the bulk <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment occurs. <strong>The</strong> numbers are compelling:<br />
four out <strong>of</strong> five children and adults visit their<br />
GP at least once in a 12-month period, and with<br />
a mean number <strong>of</strong> visits being 3.2 this accounts<br />
for millions <strong>of</strong> individual contacts. 1 About one<br />
quarter <strong>of</strong> children and adults use a public<br />
hospital service in a 12-month period (counting<br />
emergency department use, outpatient, day case<br />
and inpatient episodes). 1 Our medical graduates<br />
must be prepared to meet the treatment patterns<br />
reflected in these numbers.<br />
<strong>The</strong> shift <strong>of</strong> medical education into community<br />
settings is happening in many countries, and is<br />
readily evident in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> with the setting<br />
up <strong>of</strong> rural programmes at both our medical<br />
schools, the increasing use <strong>of</strong> general practice in<br />
undergraduate medical education, and government<br />
funding support for increased numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
vocational training places for general practice.<br />
But the barriers to increasing primary care–based<br />
medical education are numerous. Not least is the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> a long-established tradition <strong>of</strong> widespread,<br />
routine, undergraduate medical education in<br />
primary care, resulting in weak or absent basic<br />
physical infrastructure for teaching, the absence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a well-established pattern <strong>of</strong> GP registrars<br />
teaching undergraduate medical students as occurs<br />
in hospitals, and poor career structure for primary<br />
care–based teachers. Added to this is the relatively<br />
low level <strong>of</strong> government support for specialist GP<br />
vocational training compared with other specialist<br />
training programmes, notwithstanding the strong<br />
policy emphasis this decade on <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>’s<br />
‘primary care–led health system’. <strong>The</strong>n there is<br />
the sticky problem <strong>of</strong> ownership; we need to find<br />
mechanisms for government to invest in basic infrastructure<br />
for primary care–based education in<br />
a way that secures and protects public investment<br />
and simultaneously meets the needs <strong>of</strong> trainers.<br />
A head <strong>of</strong> steam is rapidly building to see these<br />
problems addressed, fuelled by recognition not<br />
only <strong>of</strong> the above <strong>issue</strong>s, but also that the current<br />
training system is not especially orientated towards<br />
equipping graduates for a career in primary<br />
care. This point is well made in a recent report <strong>of</strong><br />
the Workforce Taskforce: 2<br />
<strong>The</strong> traditional model <strong>of</strong> training doctors and<br />
nurses focuses on preparing them to work in hospital<br />
environments. This model does not meet the<br />
demands <strong>of</strong> an aging population, the rise in chronic<br />
disease and co-morbidities, and the emphasis on<br />
treatment in the community.<br />
Primary health care requires a workforce with skills<br />
and competencies to implement primary and population<br />
health services in the community. Practitioners<br />
need to be flexible, contextually responsive, innovative<br />
and engaged in a process <strong>of</strong> life-long learning.<br />
A new and exciting development is the recent<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> a project by the Universities<br />
<strong>of</strong> Auckland and Otago and the RNZCGP.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y have jointly funded the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
a National <strong>General</strong> Practice Clinical Placement<br />
Coordination position. <strong>The</strong> first-year objectives <strong>of</strong><br />
this project are to:<br />
• coordinate student and registrar placements<br />
in general practice settings;<br />
EDITORIALs<br />
GUEsT EDiTORiAL<br />
Peter Crampton<br />
MBChB, PhD, FAFPHM,<br />
MRnZCGP, Dean and<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> Campus,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Otago<br />
Wellington<br />
CORREsPOnDEnCE TO:<br />
Peter Crampton<br />
school <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />
and Health science,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Otago,<br />
Wellington, PO Box 7343,<br />
Wellington, new <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
peter.crampton@<br />
otago.ac.nz<br />
VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE 5
EDITORIALs<br />
GUEsT EDiTORiAL<br />
Barry S Parsonson<br />
MA(Hons),<br />
PGDipClinPsych, PhD,<br />
FnZPss,<br />
Registered Psychologist,<br />
special Education Group,<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education,<br />
new <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
CORREsPOnDEnCE TO:<br />
Barry Parsonson<br />
PO Box 829, napier,<br />
new <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
drp@appliedpsych.co.nz<br />
• establish a common database <strong>of</strong><br />
teaching practices;<br />
• develop and implement a joint communications<br />
plan to promote GP teaching;<br />
• initiate liaison with DHBs to link with<br />
second-year house surgeon placements; and<br />
• provide project management support<br />
for combined University and<br />
<strong>College</strong> policy development.<br />
This project is a coordinated attempt to plan and<br />
build basic infrastructure for primary care-based<br />
medical education in the hope <strong>of</strong> meeting the<br />
medical needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>’s population in 20<br />
and 30 years’ time. It will require the support <strong>of</strong><br />
the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health and the Tertiary Education<br />
Commission to promote and fund some <strong>of</strong><br />
the vital elements such as quality standards for<br />
teaching practices and student consulting rooms.<br />
I am hopeful that the Journal will keep abreast <strong>of</strong><br />
medical education <strong>issue</strong>s and play an important<br />
role in disseminating research papers related to<br />
primary care–based teaching and learning. While<br />
this editorial has focused on medical education,<br />
needless to say similar attention must be paid<br />
to the future <strong>of</strong> primary care–based nursing<br />
education. In the meantime, the challenge for the<br />
sector is to translate the vision <strong>of</strong> a primary care–<br />
led health system into a primary care–led medical<br />
education system. <strong>The</strong>re is much work to be done.<br />
Using psychoactive medication to<br />
intervene in children’s behaviour:<br />
An evidence-based practice?<br />
Introduction<br />
This paper arose out <strong>of</strong> concern that many child<br />
clients with behaviour <strong>issue</strong>s also are clients <strong>of</strong><br />
paediatric and child and adolescent health services<br />
which prescribe medication as a means <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
management. In addition, concerns arose over<br />
the increasing moves to ‘pathologise’ children’s<br />
behaviour. For example, in an editorial preceding<br />
a series <strong>of</strong> research articles on ‘preschool<br />
pathology’, Angold and Egger 1 state ‘We can now<br />
confidently assert that we have the wherewithal<br />
to assess the psychiatric status <strong>of</strong> children down<br />
to age two [years]’. While admitting perfection<br />
was not yet attained, they added that, as a<br />
consequence, there was no reason to exclude such<br />
young children from studies <strong>of</strong> specific psychiatric<br />
disorders. <strong>The</strong>y describe studies <strong>of</strong> parental,<br />
teacher and self assessments <strong>of</strong> preschoolers<br />
which predict subsequent behavioural and emotional<br />
disorders at school age without questioning<br />
References<br />
1. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. A Portrait <strong>of</strong> Health, Key Results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
2006/07 new <strong>Zealand</strong> Health survey. Wellington: Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Health; 2008.<br />
2. Workforce Taskforce. Working Together for Better Primary<br />
Health Care, Overcoming barriers to workforce change and innovation,<br />
Report to the Minister <strong>of</strong> Health from the Workforce<br />
Taskforce. Wellington Workforce Taskforce; 2008.<br />
the validity or reliability <strong>of</strong> such instruments.<br />
Even more troubling is their opinion that if these<br />
emergent disorders are not treated by age two to<br />
three years, it may be too late to produce effective<br />
change via primary prevention interventions.<br />
Sterba, Egger, and Angold 2 claim that the rates <strong>of</strong><br />
DSM-IV disorders 3 in preschoolers are similar to<br />
those for children and adolescents and that DSM-<br />
IV diagnoses are relevant for children in the<br />
two- to five-year-old range, even though the DSM<br />
manual itself does not make such provision.<br />
Angold and Egger do not comment on what they<br />
consider to be ‘primary prevention’ for preschoolers,<br />
nor do they consider the possibility that<br />
predictions made in toddlerhood that then are<br />
confirmed in childhood may well be a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> constant environmental factors (e.g. parenting,<br />
parental depression or poverty), rather than<br />
products <strong>of</strong> a child’s ‘psychopathology’. 1 One<br />
6 VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE
further obvious consequence <strong>of</strong> the focus on<br />
early childhood psychopathology is the introduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> psychotropic medications as interventions.<br />
Recent publicity concerning the prescription <strong>of</strong><br />
antidepressants to two-year-olds in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
is one exemplar. <strong>The</strong> reported 40-fold increases in<br />
bipolar diagnosis and medication <strong>of</strong> children and<br />
adolescents in the USA between 1994 and 2003<br />
represents another. 4 Both reports raise concerns.<br />
Parents and teachers <strong>of</strong> children with problem<br />
behaviours appear to demand medication as a<br />
‘quick fix’. Parents and school personnel praising<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> medication who were quoted in<br />
some reports were found to focus primarily on<br />
reductions in these behaviours. Only a few <strong>of</strong> the<br />
parents cited were troubled by associated weight<br />
gains and dyskinesia. Those promoting early diagnosis<br />
and medication are expressing no concerns<br />
about any long-term neuro-developmental risks or<br />
potential learning deficits resulting from medication<br />
during early childhood or administration on<br />
a long-term basis, which suggests that these are<br />
not yet important considerations in their view.<br />
This is not to say that concerns about the pathologisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> childhood are not being expressed<br />
from within psychiatry, as recent articles 5 and<br />
books 6 attest. <strong>The</strong> question remains as to whether<br />
these critics are being heard over the evident blare<br />
<strong>of</strong> publicity from protagonists <strong>of</strong> early identification<br />
and treatment, including the reported<br />
pressures from the pharmaceutical industry for<br />
psychiatrists, paediatricians and parents to identify<br />
and treat ‘disorders’ in early childhood with<br />
medications that rarely have been researched in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> their impacts on children’s development.<br />
One problem for those working with children in<br />
the school environment is a lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
by teachers, Resource Teachers Learning and<br />
Behaviour (RTLB) and educational psychologists<br />
about medications prescribed for children. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
is evidence that, despite 25% <strong>of</strong> children referred<br />
to them being medicated, many psychologists<br />
working in schools in the USA lacked adequate<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> psycho-pharmaceutical agents. 7<br />
Parents and teachers <strong>of</strong>ten report expectations<br />
that the medication will effect positive changes<br />
in behaviour, but <strong>of</strong>ten seem completely uninformed<br />
about the efficacy, suitability or potentially<br />
harmful side effects <strong>of</strong> the adult psycho-<br />
pharmaceutical agents typically prescribed for<br />
these children. <strong>The</strong>re is also evidence <strong>of</strong> a lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> consultation between those providing psychosocial<br />
interventions within schools and those prescribing<br />
medication to the same children, despite<br />
widespread advice that pharmaceutical interventions<br />
should be accompanied by psychosocial<br />
ones. 8-10 In many instances any evidence-based rationale<br />
for prescribing some <strong>of</strong> these medications,<br />
especially to children and adolescents (e.g. 11, 12 ),<br />
is reliant on small sample studies, <strong>of</strong>ten comprising<br />
diverse groups and only a few <strong>of</strong> which use<br />
double-blind case controlled designs. In an age<br />
in which evidence-based practice and informed<br />
consent are deemed to be requirements <strong>of</strong> good<br />
practice, the data need to be examined.<br />
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity<br />
Disorder (ADHD)<br />
<strong>The</strong> most widely used and, probably, the best<br />
researched medication for child behaviour<br />
management is Ritalin (methylphenidate) which<br />
is widely prescribed for ADHD. 8 Some children<br />
do appear to respond well to Ritalin, although<br />
not all diagnosed with ADHD do so and caution<br />
is advised in assessing and regularly reviewing<br />
medication. 8,12 <strong>The</strong>re are clearly some common<br />
CNS and physical side effects which are likely<br />
to impact on school performance, including<br />
headache, drowsiness, dizziness and dyskinesia. 12<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are concerns about the long-term effects <strong>of</strong><br />
Ritalin on children, including stunted growth,<br />
hypertension and increased risk <strong>of</strong> stroke, as<br />
well as questions about the actual benefits <strong>of</strong> its<br />
long-term use in managing hyperactivity. Some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the major <strong>issue</strong>s <strong>of</strong> conflict around ADHD,<br />
apart from concerns about the use <strong>of</strong> medication,<br />
are those <strong>of</strong> whether or not it is a ‘disorder’, how<br />
valid the DSM-IV 3 criteria are, 13,14 and to what<br />
extent the ‘disorder’ model <strong>of</strong> ADHD is driven<br />
by the pharmaceutical industry itself. 14,15<br />
In their major review <strong>of</strong> the literature, Fonagy et<br />
al. 9 conclude that stimulant medication is most<br />
effective. For the 25% <strong>of</strong> children diagnosed as<br />
ADHD and not responding well to stimulants<br />
they suggest that antidepressants may represent<br />
an option, although there are cautions relating to<br />
their use with children. While acknowledging<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> combining medication with psychoso-<br />
EDITORIALs<br />
GUEsT EDiTORiAL<br />
VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE 7
EDITORIALs<br />
GUEsT EDiTORiAL<br />
cial interventions, their review suggests that few<br />
<strong>of</strong> the latter, on their own, have as much impact as<br />
medication on core symptoms, such as inattention<br />
and hyperkinesis. <strong>The</strong>re is evidence that behaviour<br />
modification is <strong>of</strong> some assistance with reducing<br />
<strong>of</strong>f-task and disruptive behaviours and then can<br />
lead to reductions in medication. CBT enhanced effective<br />
coping and choice making and multi-modal<br />
interventions were still being evaluated at the time<br />
(i.e. 2000). Systemic and psychodynamic interventions<br />
lacked empirical data for or against their use.<br />
Concerns about the high degree <strong>of</strong> co-morbity<br />
between ADHD and conduct and mood disorders<br />
and specific learning deficits, and the reliability<br />
and validity <strong>of</strong> ADHD diagnosis 14 may be supported<br />
by the large variations between studies in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong> various medications and<br />
psychosocial interventions. Questions also have<br />
been raised about the validity <strong>of</strong> the neuro-imaging<br />
studies used to support claims that ADHD<br />
has a neurological basis. 16 It seems the jury is still<br />
out on just what ADHD is and whether or not it<br />
is a ‘disorder’.<br />
Anxiety<br />
Wolpert et al. concluded that the front line interventions<br />
for anxiety disorders in children were the<br />
behavioural therapies, including Cognitive Behaviour<br />
<strong>The</strong>rapy (CBT). 10 <strong>The</strong>y suggested that only if<br />
these failed to produce effects should the addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> anti-depressant medication be considered as an<br />
option. It was noted that medication alone was less<br />
effective than medication in combination with<br />
behavioural interventions. A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
CBT interventions with children and adolescents<br />
diagnosed with anxiety disorders concluded that<br />
both individual and group CBT interventions were<br />
more effective than placebo; that brief interventions<br />
were as effective as longer ones; and that<br />
CBT showed that beneficial treatment effects were<br />
maintained in long-term follow-up.<br />
Autism spectrum Disorders (AsD)<br />
Medications ranging from atypical antipsychotics<br />
and SSRIs are <strong>of</strong>ten prescribed for ASD symptoms<br />
such as ‘Obsessive Compulsive Disorder<br />
(OCD)’, ‘depression’, ‘aggression’ and ‘withdrawal’<br />
in children and adolescents diagnosed<br />
with ASD. A review <strong>of</strong> almost 1700 medication<br />
studies by Broadstock et al., which included<br />
adolescents but not children, found only five that<br />
met criteria for randomised placebo-controlled<br />
investigations. 11 <strong>The</strong> medications included risperidone<br />
(2), naltrexone (1), fluvoxamine (1), and<br />
clomipramine and haloperidol (1). Most trials<br />
were comprised <strong>of</strong> small numbers <strong>of</strong> participants,<br />
included older children and adults and were<br />
short-term (e.g. six weeks), which raised questions<br />
about the generality <strong>of</strong> the findings, especially<br />
in respect <strong>of</strong> long-term drug administration. <strong>The</strong><br />
authors concluded that while some <strong>of</strong> the medications<br />
showed some benefit for some participants,<br />
no conclusions could be reached about relative<br />
efficacy other than that haloperidol might have<br />
some advantage over clomipramine and that naltrexone<br />
was found to be ineffective. Further, no<br />
differentiation between efficacy for pre-pubertal<br />
vs post-pubertal individuals was possible and<br />
no useful information relating to treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
co-morbid disorders was able to be identified.<br />
Fonagy et al. concluded from their extensive<br />
review that, while some medications produced<br />
some symptom reduction, there was little justification<br />
for medication <strong>of</strong> children with ASD<br />
except where there was co-morbid ADHD, when<br />
stimulant medication might <strong>of</strong>fer some benefit. 9<br />
<strong>The</strong>y recommended behavioural intervention as<br />
the first order intervention, with medication being<br />
trialled if the former proved ineffective.<br />
Questions need to be asked about the validity<br />
<strong>of</strong> applying separate DSM-IV diagnostic labels<br />
to behaviours typical <strong>of</strong> ASD and treating them<br />
specifically. For example, when narrow, specific<br />
interests are relabelled as OCD and then medicated<br />
as such it may be inappropriate, given that the<br />
mechanisms and functions <strong>of</strong> such behaviours in<br />
autism are possibly very different from those in<br />
OCD. In addition, while there are relatively few<br />
adequate studies <strong>of</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong> medications,<br />
there are many hundreds which demonstrate<br />
the efficacy <strong>of</strong> psychosocial interventions for a<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> ASD behaviours, such as Applied<br />
Behaviour Analysis (cf. Maurice et al. 17 ).<br />
In summary, Fonagy et al. 9 concluded that there<br />
were no adequate studies <strong>of</strong> children with Asperger’s<br />
Syndrome and that for ASD in general,<br />
behavioural programmes should be tried first,<br />
8 VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE
with ADHD being managed by medication and<br />
that ‘there is no evidence to support the routine<br />
use <strong>of</strong> other medications’.<br />
Attachment disorders<br />
Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> children as having these seems to be<br />
fashionable at present. Reviews <strong>of</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
attachment ‘disorders’ 18 and <strong>of</strong> attachment theory,<br />
research and treatment 19 point to concerns over<br />
assessment, diagnosis and treatment strategies. For<br />
example O’Connor and Byrne noted that clinicians<br />
rarely use attachment measures in the process<br />
<strong>of</strong> diagnosis and <strong>of</strong>ten have limited knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> attachment theory or training in its application.<br />
Equally, they note, attachment measures are not<br />
designed to be diagnostic <strong>of</strong> attachment disorder,<br />
which has no established assessment protocol.<br />
Slater comments that so-called ‘attachment disorder’,<br />
as set out in diagnostic manuals is more about<br />
child maltreatment than attachment. She states<br />
that the research underpinning diagnosis owes<br />
little, if anything, to attachment theory as promulgated<br />
by Bowlby and Ainsworth and is more<br />
grounded in research concerned with the social<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> maltreated children. Similarly, Slater<br />
notes, interventions focus on introducing a consistent<br />
and available caregiver or improving the<br />
relationship with the current caregiver without<br />
directly addressing the child’s own attachment<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s or models. She concludes that the current<br />
definitions <strong>of</strong> reactive attachment disorder are<br />
not helpful in meeting children’s needs because<br />
they owe so little to developmental research in<br />
attachment and that, regardless, it seems inappropriate<br />
to pathologise children for having had such<br />
a disruptive start to life. One has to wonder if the<br />
‘pathology’ in attachment disorders does not relate<br />
more to the inadequacies <strong>of</strong> the children’s caregivers<br />
than to the children who are so labelled!<br />
<strong>The</strong> American Academy <strong>of</strong> Child and Adolescent<br />
Psychiatry (AACAP) has recently published a<br />
practice parameter relating to assessment and<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> children and adolescents with Reactive<br />
Attachment Disorder that raises concerns<br />
about the potential harm to young children’s<br />
developing brains from psychopharmacological<br />
medication, the need to try medication-free<br />
interventions first and the risks that any interventions<br />
pose if they have not been derived from<br />
appropriate studies. 20 This is one ray <strong>of</strong> light<br />
in a field in which many medical practitioners,<br />
including paediatricians and child psychiatrists,<br />
seem comfortable with prescribing psychoactive<br />
medications for young children without trying,<br />
or necessarily being aware <strong>of</strong>, any other modes <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention, such as behavioural therapies.<br />
Mood disorders<br />
Medication <strong>of</strong> childhood ‘mood disorders’ (depression<br />
and bipolar disorders) has, as noted earlier,<br />
become increasingly popular in recent times.<br />
Healy and Le Noury 5 are highly critical <strong>of</strong> the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> paediatric bipolar disorder as a condition.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y argue that the ‘disorder’ is primarily<br />
a creation <strong>of</strong> the pharmaceutical industry and are<br />
critical <strong>of</strong> the apparent lack <strong>of</strong> academic scepticism<br />
accompanying the promotion <strong>of</strong> the ‘disorder’ and<br />
the capture <strong>of</strong> psychiatrists by that industry. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
are concerned at the consequences for children <strong>of</strong><br />
exposure to ‘cocktails <strong>of</strong> potent drugs without any<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> benefit’. 5 <strong>The</strong> drugs listed in the article<br />
include Depakote, olanzapine, risperidone, and<br />
quetiapine and it is reported that some children<br />
receive more than one <strong>of</strong> these medications.<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression in children aged between<br />
nine and 16 years is reported as estimated to<br />
be about 9.5%. In the UK, the NICE guidelines<br />
relating to childhood depression advise that the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> choice for the first three months<br />
should be psychological (CBT, Family <strong>The</strong>rapy or<br />
Interpersonal <strong>The</strong>rapy). 10 Only if this intervention<br />
does not produce symptomatic improvement<br />
by six weeks is anti-depressant medication recommended<br />
for adolescents only, and then only in<br />
conjunction with either CBT or Family <strong>The</strong>rapy.<br />
Medication is not recommended for younger children.<br />
In other words, the first line <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
is psychological and the second, for adolescents<br />
only, is the addition <strong>of</strong> medication, preferably<br />
fluoxitine. 10 Perera et al. found that in their South<br />
London CAMHS setting, 28% <strong>of</strong> 25 children and<br />
adolescents being treated for depression were medicated<br />
without any psychological therapy and 72%<br />
were receiving both, with most being prescribed<br />
fluoxitine, despite known enhanced risk <strong>of</strong> suicide<br />
in adolescents taking this medication. <strong>The</strong>y provided<br />
no data on whether psychological interventions<br />
were tried alone at first, on the severity <strong>of</strong><br />
EDITORIALs<br />
GUEsT EDiTORiAL<br />
VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE 9
EDITORIALs<br />
GUEsT EDiTORiAL<br />
depression or age range <strong>of</strong> the participants, except<br />
that seven (28%) were under age 15 years.<br />
Conclusions<br />
This overview makes no pretence <strong>of</strong> being<br />
comprehensive, but even a brief review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
literature raises questions about the direction that<br />
psychiatric diagnosis and treatment <strong>of</strong> children<br />
is taking, along with concerns about the increasing<br />
tendency to pathologise and medicate what<br />
are represented as ‘disorders’ <strong>of</strong> childhood. It<br />
appears that little cognizance has been taken <strong>of</strong><br />
the changes in society that could lead to what are<br />
essentially adaptive and functional human behaviours<br />
in evolutionary terms being increasingly<br />
deemed pathological as we change living styles.<br />
In earlier times children were given the freedom<br />
or opportunity to help adults in a range <strong>of</strong> activities<br />
and/or to play and roam outdoors. Nowadays,<br />
they are more likely to be required to stay within<br />
the bounds <strong>of</strong> small sections or to be indoors<br />
where play involves a video game console or computer<br />
games. <strong>The</strong>y also are typically transported<br />
to and from school each weekday, where they<br />
spend still more time in an environment in which<br />
they <strong>of</strong>ten are expected to sit relatively still,<br />
to concentrate, and generally to be fairly quiet.<br />
Expectations <strong>of</strong> children that they will moderate<br />
their behaviour and not disturb adults in such<br />
environments may fuel demands for medication<br />
to achieve the tolerable states <strong>of</strong> child behaviour<br />
which parents and teachers appear to be failing to<br />
obtain without it.<br />
<strong>The</strong> irony <strong>of</strong> providing children with prescription<br />
medications to manage their behaviours and<br />
moods while simultaneously warning them <strong>of</strong><br />
the dangers <strong>of</strong> so-called recreational drugs seems<br />
to be lost on our society. Societal changes over<br />
time are, in part, the focus <strong>of</strong> the anthropological<br />
study <strong>of</strong> ADHD by Neufeld and Foy 15 which is<br />
instructive and suggests similar cautions should<br />
apply to other so-called disorders <strong>of</strong> childhood<br />
that now are increasingly being identified earlier<br />
and treated with psychotrophic medications. We<br />
ignore the contextual circumstances and functional<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> ‘problem’ behaviour at our<br />
peril. We medicate children without yet being<br />
aware <strong>of</strong> the possible long-term risks and costs,<br />
both for them and us, even if life is more peace-<br />
ful when they are medicated. <strong>The</strong> concerns and<br />
cautions expressed by the AACAP 20 in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> Attachment Disorder should more<br />
generally be voiced as applicable to the whole<br />
spectrum <strong>of</strong> childhood ‘disorders’ <strong>of</strong> behaviour,<br />
given that the underlying developmental risks are<br />
the same.<br />
References<br />
1. Angold A, Egger HL. Preschool psychopathology: lessons for<br />
the lifespan. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Oct 2007;48(10):961–<br />
966.<br />
2. sterba s, Egger HL, Angold A. Diagnostic specificity and nonspecificity<br />
in the dimensions <strong>of</strong> preschool psychopathology. J<br />
Child Psychol Psychiatry Oct 2007;48(10):1005–1013.<br />
3. American Psychiatric Association, ed. Diagnostic and statistical<br />
Manual iV. 4th ed. Washington DC; 2004.<br />
4. Cary B. Bipolar illness soars as a diagnosis for the young. new<br />
York Times. september 4, 2007.<br />
5. Healy D, Le noury J. Pediatric bipolar disorder: An object <strong>of</strong><br />
study in the creation <strong>of</strong> an illness (Cited in sharav, V. H., 2007).<br />
int J Risk safety Med 2007;19:209–221.<br />
6. Timimi s, ed. Pathological child psychiatry and the medicalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> childhood. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge; 2002.<br />
7. Carlson Js, Demaray MK, Hunter-Oehmk s. A survey <strong>of</strong> school<br />
psychologists’ knowledge and training in child psychopharmacology.<br />
Psych sch 2006;43(5):623–633.<br />
8. Abrams L, Flood J, Phelps L. Psychopharmacology in schools.<br />
Psych sch 2006;43(4):493–501.<br />
9. Fonagy P, Target M, Cottrell D, Phillips J, Kurtz Z. A review <strong>of</strong><br />
the outcomes <strong>of</strong> all treatments <strong>of</strong> psychiatric disorder in childhood:<br />
MCH 17-33. Final Report to the national Health service<br />
Executive. London: national Health service; July 2000.<br />
10. Wolpert M, Fuggle P, Cottrell D, Fonagy P, eds. Drawing on<br />
Evidence: Advice for mental health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals working with<br />
children and adolescents. 2nd ed. London: CAMHs Publications;<br />
2006.<br />
11. Broadstock M, Doughty C, Eggleston M. systematic review<br />
<strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> pharmacological treatments for adolescents<br />
and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Jul<br />
2007;11(4):335–348.<br />
12. Curel P, Kumar n, Robinson B, editors. new Ethicals. 8th ed.<br />
Auckland: Adis international Ltd; 2004.<br />
13. Barkley RA. international Consensus statement on ADHD. J<br />
Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Dec 2002;41(12):1389.<br />
14. Timimi s, Moncrieff J, Jureidini J, et al. A critique <strong>of</strong> the<br />
international consensus statement on ADHD. Clin Child Fam<br />
Psychol Rev Mar 2004;7(1):59–63.<br />
15. neufield P, Foy M. Historical reflections on the ascendancy<br />
<strong>of</strong> ADHD in north America c. 1980 – c. 2005. Br J Ed studies<br />
2006;54(4):449–470.<br />
16. Leo J, Cohen D. Broken brains or flawed studies? A critical<br />
review <strong>of</strong> ADHD neuroimaging research. J Mind Behav Win<br />
2003;24(1):29–56.<br />
17. Maurice C, Green G, Foxx RM, eds. Making a difference: Behavioral<br />
interventions for Autism. Austin; 2001. TX: PRO-ED.<br />
18. O’Connor TG, Byrne J. Attachment measures for research and<br />
practice. Child Adolesc Mental Health nov 2007;12(4):187–192.<br />
19. slater R. Attachment: <strong>The</strong>oretical development and critique.<br />
Educ Psychol Pract sep 2007;23(3):205–219.<br />
20. Boris nW, Zeanah CH, Work Group on Quality i. Practice<br />
parameter for the assessment and treatment <strong>of</strong> children and<br />
adolescents with reactive attachment disorder <strong>of</strong> infancy and<br />
early childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry nov<br />
2005;44(11):1206–1219.<br />
10 VOLUME 1 • nUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURnAL OF PRiMARY HEALTH CARE
Cardiovascular risk assessment and<br />
management in mental health clients:<br />
Perceptions <strong>of</strong> mental health and general<br />
practitioners in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Amanda Wheeler PGDipPsychPharm, BPharm, BSc, MRPharmS, RegPharmNZ; 1,2 Jeff Harrison PhD,<br />
DipClinPharm, GradCertClinEd, BSc (Hons), MRPharmS, RegPharmNZ, BCPS; 1,2 Zara Homes BPharm 2<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
INTRODUCTION: People with mental illness have higher rates <strong>of</strong> morbidity and mortality, largely due<br />
to increased rates <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular disease (CVD). Metabolic syndrome is well recognised but rarely<br />
expressed as a need to assess and manage cardiovascular risk factors; furthermore there is confusion<br />
about whose role this is. This study explores health practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes, barriers/solutions<br />
towards cardiovascular risk assessment and management in mental health patients.<br />
METHOD: A survey <strong>of</strong> mental health practitioners (MHPs n=421) and general practitioners (GPs n=232)<br />
was undertaken in a health service in Auckland.<br />
RESULTS: Three-quarters <strong>of</strong> respondents agreed mental illness predisposes to CVD. Fifty-five percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> MH doctors agreed they could effectively assess CVD risk compared to 67% <strong>of</strong> GPs. Only 21% <strong>of</strong> MH<br />
doctors agreed they could effectively manage CVD risk compared to 57% <strong>of</strong> GPs. Seventy-nine percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> MHPs believed that assessing CVD risk was a joint responsibility between GP and MHP, compared<br />
to 33% <strong>of</strong> GPs; 62% <strong>of</strong> GPs believed it was their sole responsibility. Forty-six percent <strong>of</strong> MHPs believed<br />
managing CVD risk was a joint responsibility compared with 29% <strong>of</strong> GPs; 58% <strong>of</strong> GPs saw this as their<br />
role. Only 13% <strong>of</strong> MHPs and fewer than 4% <strong>of</strong> GPs agreed that MH services were effectively assessing<br />
and managing CVD risk. MHPs identified lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge and skills (58%) and poor communication between<br />
primary–secondary care (53%) as the main barriers. GPs identified barriers <strong>of</strong> poor communication<br />
(64%) and patient compliance with health care management (71%). <strong>The</strong> top two solutions proposed by<br />
MHPs were provision <strong>of</strong> GP subsidies (47%) and training (43%). GPs also identified provision <strong>of</strong> a subsidy<br />
(66%) and collaborative management between GPs and MH (44%) as solutions.<br />
CONCLUSION: <strong>The</strong>re is widespread recognition <strong>of</strong> increased risk <strong>of</strong> CVD in MH patients. MHPs do not<br />
believe they have the knowledge and skills to manage this risk. GPs believe this is their responsibility.<br />
Both groups recognise communication with, and access to, primary care for MH patients as key barriers.<br />
KEyWORDS: Mental health, cardiovascular risk, risk reduction<br />
Introduction<br />
People with serious mental illness have increased<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> comorbid physical illness. 1-3<br />
<strong>The</strong> NZ Mental Health Survey found that people<br />
with mental disorder had higher prevalence rates<br />
<strong>of</strong> chronic physical conditions, including chronic<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
pain, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and<br />
respiratory illness; 68% with a mental disorder<br />
had at least one chronic physical condition compared<br />
with 53% without mental disorder. 3<br />
Serious mental illness is associated with excess<br />
mortality. 4-6 This excess mortality cannot<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
1 Waitemata District Health<br />
Board, Auckland<br />
2 School <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, Faculty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medical and Health<br />
Sciences, <strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong><br />
Auckland, Auckland<br />
J PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2009;1(1):11–19.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO<br />
Amanda Wheeler<br />
Director, Clinical<br />
Research & Resource<br />
Centre, Waitemata<br />
District Health Board,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
amanda.wheeler@<br />
waitematadhb.govt.nz<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 11
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
be explained by self-harm or other injury. 7 A<br />
meta-analysis demonstrated a 1.5–fold increase in<br />
age-adjusted mortality for people with schizophrenia;<br />
8 similar increases have been found in<br />
cohorts with bipolar and major depression. 4 Cardiovascular<br />
disease (CVD) is one <strong>of</strong> the dominant<br />
factors in this excess mortality 9-12 and there is<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> an excess <strong>of</strong> obesity, hypertension,<br />
metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes that<br />
underpins this greater cardiovascular morbidity<br />
and mortality. 13-18<br />
Compounding this increased prevalence <strong>of</strong> CVD<br />
risk factors are the medications for mental illness,<br />
particularly second-generation antipsychotics and<br />
mood stabilisers. <strong>The</strong>se agents are associated with<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> insulin resistance, abdominal<br />
obesity, the metabolic syndrome and overt diabetes.<br />
19-26 Such metabolic changes translate directly<br />
into an atherogenic risk factor pr<strong>of</strong>ile. 10,27<br />
<strong>The</strong> NZ Health Strategy has highlighted significant<br />
health inequalities and the need to improve<br />
the health status <strong>of</strong> people with mental illness as<br />
one <strong>of</strong> its 13 goals for improvement. 28 A document<br />
that recognises the importance <strong>of</strong> effectively<br />
assessing and managing risk factors for metabolic<br />
syndrome in people with mental illness has been<br />
developed and disseminated by a national mental<br />
health (MH) metabolic working group. However,<br />
there is incomplete linkage <strong>of</strong> this to CVD risk<br />
and inconsistent implementation <strong>of</strong> the recommendations<br />
<strong>of</strong> this initiative throughout the<br />
country. 29 <strong>The</strong>re also appears to be confusion over<br />
role boundaries, with health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals being<br />
unsure <strong>of</strong> whose responsibility it is to assess and<br />
manage the physical health <strong>of</strong> patients with a serious<br />
mental illness. This is particularly a problem<br />
for people whose only access to the health system<br />
is through their psychiatrist or MH provider.<br />
This study aimed firstly to determine health practitioners’<br />
attitudes and knowledge about the assessment<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk<br />
in patients with a mental illness and, secondly,<br />
to identify the barriers and possible solutions to<br />
addressing this <strong>issue</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re is a particular focus<br />
on whom health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals believe should be<br />
responsible for monitoring and managing the<br />
physical health <strong>of</strong> secondary care MH patients.<br />
Methods<br />
Questionnaire development<br />
A semi-structured interview was conducted with<br />
eight key informants to explore knowledge, experience,<br />
current practice and attitudes in assessing<br />
and managing cardiovascular risk in people with<br />
a serious mental illness. <strong>The</strong> key informants<br />
included MH practitioners, GPs and a consumer<br />
advisor. Based on the preliminary findings, a<br />
questionnaire was developed addressing the important<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> the study. A draft questionnaire<br />
was piloted with another eight MH and primary<br />
care practitioners, who provided feedback on the<br />
questionnaire’s content and format; changes were<br />
made accordingly.<br />
Two final questionnaires were developed. One,<br />
for MH practitioners, consisting <strong>of</strong> 35 questions<br />
and the other, for GPs, omitted three questions<br />
and some questions were amended slightly to<br />
ensure audience relevancy. Each questionnaire<br />
took five to 10 minutes to complete. <strong>The</strong> first<br />
section collected demographic data (years <strong>of</strong><br />
experience, age, ethnicity) as well as information<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iling the patients the participant provided<br />
care for. <strong>The</strong> second section consisted <strong>of</strong> attitudinal<br />
questions. Participants were asked if they<br />
were concerned about psychotropic medications<br />
increasing cardiovascular risk and to indicate (using<br />
a 6-point Likert scale) whether they agreed or<br />
disagreed with statements ranging from strongly<br />
agree to strongly disagree, or how <strong>of</strong>ten they<br />
referred patients to particular interventions, ranging<br />
from always to never. <strong>The</strong>re was also a series<br />
<strong>of</strong> questions assessing the practitioner’s level <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk assessment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> final part <strong>of</strong> the survey asked participants to<br />
identify (from a list generated from key informant<br />
interviews and pilot) the three most important<br />
barriers and solutions to assessment and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk in people with<br />
a serious mental illness. Further comments could<br />
be made at the end <strong>of</strong> the survey. (A copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
questionnaire can be requested from corresponding<br />
author).<br />
Ethics approval was obtained from the University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee<br />
(2006/L/020).<br />
12 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Participants<br />
<strong>The</strong> anonymous questionnaire was distributed to<br />
MH practitioners and GPs providing care within<br />
the Waitemata District Health Board catchment<br />
area. This service is the largest in NZ and provides<br />
both primary and secondary health care to north<br />
and west Auckland [2006 population <strong>of</strong> 481 611<br />
making up 12% <strong>of</strong> total population 30 ] and includes<br />
forensic, acute and community MH services. <strong>The</strong><br />
questionnaire was distributed by email to 421 MH<br />
practitioners (83 senior medical <strong>of</strong>ficers [psychiatrists<br />
and medical <strong>of</strong>ficers], 93 psychiatric trainees,<br />
seven house <strong>of</strong>ficers, six MH pharmacists and<br />
231 MH nursing staff). An email reminder was<br />
sent two weeks later; the researchers also attended<br />
medical education and team meetings to encourage<br />
participation. Participants were asked to return<br />
anonymous questionnaires in the internal mail.<br />
Questionnaires were also disseminated to 232<br />
GPs across six Primary Health Organisations<br />
Table 1. Participant demographics<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional role<br />
Response rate<br />
Years experience<br />
0–5<br />
SMO<br />
n (%)<br />
22/83<br />
(27)<br />
Nil<br />
5–10 2/22<br />
(9.1)<br />
10–15 4/22<br />
(18.2)<br />
15+ 16/22<br />
(72.7)<br />
Ethnicity<br />
NZ<br />
European<br />
12/22<br />
(54.5)<br />
Other** 10/22<br />
(45.5)<br />
MH<br />
nurse<br />
n (%)<br />
52/231<br />
(22.5)<br />
5/52<br />
(9.6)<br />
7/52<br />
(13.5)<br />
10/52<br />
(19.2)<br />
30/52<br />
(57.7)<br />
32/52<br />
(61.5)<br />
20/52<br />
(38.5)<br />
MH<br />
pharmacist<br />
n (%)<br />
6/6<br />
(100)<br />
1/6<br />
(16.7)<br />
2/6<br />
(33.3)<br />
3/6<br />
(50)<br />
House<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
n (%)<br />
3/7<br />
(43)<br />
2/3<br />
(66.7)<br />
Nil<br />
1/3<br />
(33.3)<br />
Nil Nil<br />
5/6<br />
(83.3)<br />
1/6<br />
(16.7)<br />
1/3<br />
(33.3)<br />
2/3<br />
(66.6)<br />
Psychiatric<br />
trainee<br />
n (%)<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 13<br />
23/93<br />
(25)<br />
6/23<br />
(26.1)<br />
9/23<br />
(39.1)<br />
3/23<br />
(13.0)<br />
5/23<br />
(21.7)<br />
9/23<br />
(39.1)<br />
14/23<br />
(60.9)<br />
GP<br />
n (%)<br />
90/232<br />
(38.8)<br />
5/90<br />
(5.5)<br />
7/90<br />
(7.8)<br />
16/90<br />
(17.8)<br />
62/90<br />
(68.9)<br />
72/90<br />
(80.0)<br />
18/90<br />
(20.0)<br />
Total*<br />
n (%)<br />
203/611<br />
(33.2)<br />
19/198<br />
(9.6)<br />
27/198<br />
(13.6)<br />
37/198<br />
(18.7)<br />
115/198<br />
(58.1)<br />
132/198<br />
(66.7)<br />
66/198<br />
(33.3)<br />
* Seven MH participants did not disclose their pr<strong>of</strong>essional role and five participants did not disclose their ethnicity or<br />
answer the clinical experience question.<br />
** Other ethnicities included Other European, Maori, Pacific, Asian, African, Middle Eastern, North American, and not<br />
specified. <strong>The</strong>se were grouped to protect participants’ identity within small health pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups.<br />
SMO = Senior Medical Officer (psychiatrists and medical <strong>of</strong>ficers)<br />
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
What we already know: People with serious mental health disorders<br />
have an excess <strong>of</strong> morbidity and mortality due to physical health problems,<br />
including cardiovascular disease. Mental health medicines increase the risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> metabolic syndrome contributing to the excess cardiovascular disease<br />
seen in this group.<br />
What this study adds: <strong>The</strong>re is a gap between knowledge and action in<br />
cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management for mental<br />
health patients. Primary health care providers are best placed to manage<br />
CVD risk, but shared care between primary care and specialist mental health<br />
services, and mechanisms to improve access to primary care for this vulnerable<br />
group, are needed.<br />
(PHOs) located in the health service catchment<br />
area. This was done using methods chosen at the<br />
discretion <strong>of</strong> the PHO and included emailing the<br />
questionnaire to a central contact who distributed<br />
the questionnaire to GPs; posting the question-
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
Table 2. Practitioners’ views about psychotropic treatments increasing cardiovascular risk<br />
Schizophrenia<br />
Table 3. Proportion <strong>of</strong> respondents identifying cardiovascular risk management targets<br />
correctly<br />
MH practitioner<br />
n (%)<br />
<strong>General</strong> practitioner<br />
n (%)<br />
BP (< 140/85mmHg) 2 /111(1.8) 7/89 (7.9)<br />
FPG (< 6mmol/L) 25/108 (23.1) 29/89 (32.6)<br />
Total Cholesterol<br />
(
or strongly agreed that they could accurately and<br />
effectively manage CVD risk compared to 54.4%<br />
<strong>of</strong> GPs.<br />
Knowledge<br />
Most participants were unable to correctly answer<br />
the target blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose,<br />
total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels<br />
for a non-diabetic patient required to achieve<br />
a reduction in the five-year cardiovascular risk<br />
(Table 3).<br />
Responsibility for cardiovascular risk<br />
assessment and management<br />
Respondents’ views on whose role it was to assess<br />
and manage cardiovascular risk were explored<br />
next, along with questions about their own<br />
current practice in such activities. Most MH practitioners<br />
(79.1%) believed that assessing cardiovascular<br />
risk was a joint responsibility between the<br />
GP and the MH practitioner, whereas only 31.8%<br />
<strong>of</strong> GPs agreed. In contrast, GPs were far more<br />
likely to believe it was their sole responsibility<br />
compared with MH practitioners (62.5% vs 17.3%).<br />
Just less than half <strong>of</strong> MH practitioners (46.4%)<br />
believed that managing a patient’s cardiovascular<br />
risk was the joint responsibility <strong>of</strong> the GP and<br />
MH practitioner compared with 28.4% <strong>of</strong> GPs.<br />
Again, GPs were more likely to see this as their<br />
role (56.8% vs 33.6%).<br />
Finally, only 12.8% <strong>of</strong> MH practitioners and 6.9%<br />
<strong>of</strong> GPs agreed or strongly agreed that MH services<br />
effectively assess and manage cardiovascular<br />
risk in patients with serious mental illness.<br />
Respondents considered dietary advice the most<br />
required service; most respondents agreed or<br />
strongly agreed their patients required referral<br />
for dietary advice (93.6% MH practitioners; 82.2%<br />
GPs). However, fewer than half <strong>of</strong> both practitioner<br />
groups (39.5% MH practitioners; 31.5%<br />
GPs) stated that they referred patients for dietary<br />
advice either always or most <strong>of</strong> the time.<br />
Most participants agreed or strongly agreed<br />
that their patients required referral to exercise<br />
programmes (83.7% and 78.9% respectively), about<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
a third <strong>of</strong> practitioners stating they referred<br />
patients to these services either always or most <strong>of</strong><br />
the time (36.9% compared with 36.4%). Exercise<br />
referrals included the Green Prescription,<br />
to gyms in the local community or to secondary<br />
care facilities. Just over 80% <strong>of</strong> participants<br />
believed that their patients required referral to<br />
smoking cessation programmes, such as Quitline,<br />
or for nicotine replacement therapy. GPs were<br />
more likely to refer patients to appropriate smoking<br />
cessation services (44.3% vs 27.8%; chi 2 =3.07,<br />
df=1, p=0.08).<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
Figure 1. Barriers to cardiovascular risk assessment and management in mental health<br />
patients<br />
Figure 2. Solutions for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for mental health<br />
patients<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 15
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
Barriers and solutions to cardiovascular<br />
risk assessment and management<br />
Respondents were asked to indicate the three<br />
most important barriers and solutions to effectively<br />
assessing and managing CVD for patients<br />
with a serious mental illness (Figures 1 and 2).<br />
For MH practitioners the top two barriers were<br />
secondary care providers’ knowledge and skills<br />
(57.6%) and lack <strong>of</strong> communication between MH<br />
provider and GP (52.9%). Lack <strong>of</strong> time in secondary<br />
care to complete assessment and follow-up<br />
(41.2%) and patients’ financial status to accessing<br />
primary care and medications (41.2%) were jointly<br />
the third most frequently rated barrier.<br />
<strong>The</strong> top three solutions to overcome barriers<br />
were (in decreasing importance) subsidising GP<br />
visits (47.4%), training or continued education<br />
on cardiovascular screening for MH practitioners<br />
(43.2%), establishing cardiovascular screening<br />
guidelines and interventions, and improving<br />
communication between primary and secondary<br />
care (both 37.9%).<br />
This question was presented slightly differently<br />
to GPs and three options were omitted. GPs rated<br />
the most important barrier as patient factors; that<br />
is, compliance with medication and follow-up<br />
appointments (71.6%). Consistent with MH practitioners,<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> communication between MH<br />
provider and GP and a patient’s financial ability<br />
to access primary care and medications were both<br />
rated as second most important barrier (59.5%).<br />
GPs agreed with MH practitioners that subsidising<br />
primary care visits would be the most effective<br />
solution to overcoming these barriers (62.3%).<br />
<strong>The</strong> next two important solutions for GPs were<br />
collaborative management between MH and GP<br />
(45.5%), and provision <strong>of</strong> proactive programmes/<br />
interventions for cardiovascular risk assessment/<br />
management (42.1%).<br />
Other comments<br />
Participants were given the opportunity to write<br />
comments at the end <strong>of</strong> the survey. Most MH<br />
practitioners focussed on the fact that they believed<br />
that they should be involved in the assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk and helping patients<br />
to access primary health care, but that it was not<br />
their responsibility to manage this risk. Some<br />
respondents expressed concern about time and<br />
resource constraints that might restrict their ability<br />
to comprehensively manage these risk factors.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was some personal anxiety and concern<br />
expressed at the poor level <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> MH<br />
practitioners in this area <strong>of</strong> health care.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the comments from GPs focussed on<br />
funding, both in terms <strong>of</strong> a patient’s inability to<br />
pay for services and in terms <strong>of</strong> the limitations<br />
placed on the resources available to GPs. GPs also<br />
commented, but to a lesser extent, that the expertise<br />
and therefore the responsibility for managing<br />
cardiovascular risk lay with GPs. Some respondents<br />
from this group felt that the restrictions on<br />
time in primary care for consultations (average 10<br />
minutes) prevented discussions about anything<br />
more than acute <strong>issue</strong>s with patients. Lack <strong>of</strong><br />
communication between providers and paucity <strong>of</strong><br />
MH practitioners well-trained in the cardiovascular<br />
risk area was also <strong>of</strong> concern.<br />
Discussion<br />
This was the first NZ study to explore MH<br />
practitioners’ and GPs’ views on assessment and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk in people<br />
with serious mental illness. Most practitioners<br />
were aware <strong>of</strong> MH patients’ increased cardiovascular<br />
risk. Interestingly, practitioners appeared<br />
to associate the increased risk with the MH<br />
treatments they were most used to prescribing in<br />
everyday practice; treatments for schizophrenia<br />
and bipolar disorder for MH practitioners and<br />
treatments for depression in GPs. MH practitioners<br />
rated second-generation antipsychotics as the<br />
medications they were most concerned about<br />
for increasing cardiovascular risk. However, it<br />
was surprising that other medications, such as<br />
lithium and sodium valproate were not associated<br />
with increased risk by MH practitioners; there<br />
is a well-described relationship between these<br />
medications and appetite increase, weight gain,<br />
and metabolic syndrome. 31,32<br />
Whilst approximately half <strong>of</strong> MH doctors had<br />
confidence in their ability to assess patients’<br />
CVD risk, only one-fifth had faith in their own<br />
ability to effectively manage cardiovascular risk.<br />
16 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
In comparison, equal numbers <strong>of</strong> GPs reported<br />
confidence in cardiovascular assessment and<br />
management. Given the recent high pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />
CVD risk assessment and management both<br />
nationally and amongst PHOs in the Auckland<br />
area, it is perhaps surprising that fewer than<br />
two-thirds <strong>of</strong> GPs agreed that they could do this<br />
effectively. Furthermore, respondents reported<br />
confidence with assessment and management was<br />
somewhat at odds with the finding that their<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> current guideline screening targets<br />
was poor; fewer than one-tenth <strong>of</strong> MH practitioners<br />
and GPs could correctly identify the<br />
NZGG target blood pressure and total cholesterol<br />
level for a non-diabetic patient with a five-year<br />
CVD risk >15%.<br />
<strong>The</strong> survey found respondents had little faith in<br />
the current ability <strong>of</strong> MH services to accurately<br />
and effectively assess and manage cardiovascular<br />
risk—overall only 10% <strong>of</strong> practitioners agreed<br />
that this was being done effectively at present.<br />
MH practitioners suggested that they relied on<br />
the primary care sector (via joint mechanisms)<br />
for physical health screening and solely on the<br />
primary care sector for management. Most GPs<br />
believed that both screening and management<br />
were their sole responsibility. Written comments<br />
provided further evidence <strong>of</strong> this belief,<br />
with some MH practitioners stating it was their<br />
responsibility to identify risks, but that they<br />
referred patients to the GP for risk management,<br />
and some GPs commented that they had the<br />
knowledge and expertise in this area.<br />
Whilst most practitioners believed that MH<br />
patients needed to be able to access assistance<br />
and programmes for dietary advice, exercise and<br />
smoking cessation, only about a third <strong>of</strong> practitioners<br />
surveyed actually completed referrals for<br />
patients as part <strong>of</strong> their clinical role. This may<br />
indicate a lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about the services<br />
available and how to access them or may reflect<br />
the uncertainty about the boundaries <strong>of</strong> care<br />
between MH and primary care services.<br />
Despite suggestions that MH practitioners feel<br />
partly responsible for assessing cardiovascular<br />
risk, they were aware <strong>of</strong> their lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
and skill in this area and believe that they would<br />
benefit from both further training and guidance.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
<strong>The</strong>y identified that provision <strong>of</strong> guidelines for<br />
assessment and management interventions would<br />
be useful to improve this lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Mental Health Metabolic Working<br />
Group <strong>issue</strong>d guidance on monitoring for the<br />
metabolic syndrome in patients with mental illness<br />
in 2006. 33 However, this guidance does not<br />
make specific links to assessment and management<br />
<strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk, nor do the NZGG<br />
guidelines 34 identify people with serious mental<br />
illness as a risk group to be targeted for risk assessment.<br />
Whilst there is evidence describing the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> MH treatments on some indices <strong>of</strong> CVD<br />
risk, there is little data describing their effect<br />
on global CVD risk. Because the existing risk<br />
prediction models are based on population data,<br />
they may underestimate risk in this relatively<br />
young patient group; further work needs to be<br />
undertaken in this area.<br />
Financial factors were identified as an important<br />
barrier to physical health screening and management<br />
by both practitioner groups. Traditionally,<br />
screening has been managed by the primary care<br />
sector, where a co-payment has been required to<br />
visit a GP and co-payment is <strong>of</strong>ten required for<br />
prescriptions. <strong>The</strong> subsidy <strong>of</strong> regular and longer<br />
duration primary care visits and long-term treatments<br />
for this at-risk group potentially removes<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the barriers to accessing primary health<br />
care and treatment. Respondents also identified<br />
the need for better communication between the<br />
two services as vital in order to improve physical<br />
health outcomes. This is particularly important<br />
if the patient has been prescribed psychotropic<br />
medications that are essential in the treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> mental illness but which may further increase<br />
the patient’s cardiovascular risk. Collaborative<br />
management may be needed to assist patients attend<br />
follow-up appointments in primary care and<br />
adhere to additional medication.<br />
Also <strong>of</strong> note is the particular significance <strong>of</strong> some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>issue</strong>s, highlighted in this research, to<br />
cohorts <strong>of</strong> mental health clients from Maori and<br />
Pacific backgrounds. Maori and Pacific ethnicities<br />
appear to be at increased risk <strong>of</strong> CVD; Maori are<br />
known to have a higher incidence <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular<br />
events (both fatal and non-fatal) and have<br />
them earlier than non-Maori. 34 CVD contributes<br />
significantly to earlier mortality and significant<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 17
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
morbidity in Pacific people compared to European.<br />
34 Diabetes and obesity also affect Maori<br />
and Pacific peoples disproportionately compared<br />
to Europeans; this is reflected in an increased<br />
morbidity and mortality due to diabetes. 35<br />
This inequitable burden <strong>of</strong> disease is exacerbated<br />
further where CVD, diabetes and serious mental<br />
illness intersect. Maori were found to have a<br />
higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> mental illness, both serious<br />
and in general, compared to the NZ general<br />
population. 36 For serious mental illness requiring<br />
inpatient treatment, admissions for Maori have<br />
been found to be higher than non-Maori. 37,38<br />
<strong>The</strong> relationship between socioeconomic position,<br />
CVD, diabetes and mental illness is strong<br />
and, in NZ, over half the Maori population and<br />
an even greater proportion <strong>of</strong> Pacific people live<br />
in the most deprived areas. 34 However, the NZ<br />
Mental Health Survey found that Maori and<br />
Pacific people with mental illness were less likely<br />
to access health services <strong>of</strong> any type, regardless<br />
<strong>of</strong> sociodemographic factors such as age and<br />
household income. 39 This could partially be due<br />
the fact that, although secondary services are free<br />
at the point <strong>of</strong> care, primary care services where<br />
physical health is traditionally managed are only<br />
partially subsidised and the two systems function<br />
independently <strong>of</strong> each other. All <strong>of</strong> these factors<br />
may collectively put Maori and Pacific people<br />
at further risk <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular mortality. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>issue</strong>s raised by both MH practitioners and GPs<br />
with regard to access and subsidy for primary<br />
care services may be <strong>of</strong> particular significance to<br />
Maori and Pacific people, and those in the lowest<br />
socioeconomic groups.<br />
We are not aware <strong>of</strong> any published studies exploring<br />
the views <strong>of</strong> both MH practitioners and<br />
GPs, nor any focussing on cardiovascular risk.<br />
However, our findings, in terms <strong>of</strong> the concerns<br />
<strong>of</strong> MH practitioners, are reflected by two papers<br />
examining US psychiatrists’ awareness <strong>of</strong> and<br />
concerns about the impact <strong>of</strong> therapies for bipolar<br />
disorder 40 and schizophrenia 41 on metabolic<br />
syndrome. <strong>The</strong>se surveys highlighted that US<br />
psychiatrists recognise metabolic syndrome as<br />
a significant health risk and screen for metabolic<br />
effects, primarily weight gain and glucose<br />
intolerance. Psychiatrists treating bipolar disorder<br />
indicated that they also measure lipids and, to a<br />
lesser degree, blood pressure and waist circumference.<br />
40 Suppes et al. reported that three-quarters<br />
<strong>of</strong> respondents reported having diagnosed metabolic<br />
syndrome, but only 28% correctly identified<br />
the five variables used to diagnose metabolic syndrome;<br />
this has parallels with our own findings<br />
about CVD risk factor targets. Finally, Suppes<br />
et al. reported that 92% <strong>of</strong> respondents referred<br />
patients to primary care for management <strong>of</strong><br />
metabolic risk factors; this reflects the views <strong>of</strong><br />
our respondents that this is the most appropriate<br />
setting for management <strong>of</strong> CVD risk.<br />
<strong>The</strong> main limitation <strong>of</strong> this study is the poor<br />
response rate, particularly from nursing staff.<br />
Whilst the response rate is disappointing, the<br />
possible implication is that non-responders were<br />
less knowledgeable or, perhaps, less concerned<br />
about the risks <strong>of</strong> CVD in MH patients. <strong>The</strong><br />
assumption that lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about the<br />
area resulted in a poorer response is somewhat<br />
supported by comments made at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
survey and to the facilitators who presented the<br />
survey to potential participants at journal club<br />
and CME meetings. If this assumption is correct,<br />
then the scale <strong>of</strong> inaction and unmet need may be<br />
greater even than highlighted in this study.<br />
In conclusion, this survey found that there is<br />
widespread recognition <strong>of</strong> the increased risk <strong>of</strong><br />
CVD in patients with a serious mental illness.<br />
MH practitioners do not currently have the<br />
knowledge and skills to assume responsibility for<br />
assessing or managing this risk. GPs believe that<br />
this is primarily their responsibility. Both groups<br />
recognise the barriers presented by communication<br />
with, and access to, primary care services<br />
for, MH patients. <strong>The</strong> survey highlights potential<br />
concerns about the management <strong>of</strong> physical<br />
health in this high-risk group; further research is<br />
required to both identify the burden <strong>of</strong> physical<br />
ill health in this group, and to describe their engagement<br />
with physical and preventative health<br />
services, including CVD risk assessment and<br />
management.<br />
References<br />
1. Dickey B, Normand SL, Weiss RD, Drake RE, Azeni H. Medical<br />
morbidity, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Psychiatr<br />
Serv 2002;53(7):861–7.<br />
2. Sokal J, Messias E, Dickerson FB, Kreyenbuhl J, Brown CH,<br />
Goldberg RW, et al. Comorbidity <strong>of</strong> medical illnesses among<br />
18 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
adults with serious mental illness who are receiving community<br />
psychiatric services. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004;192(6):421–7.<br />
3. Scott KM, Oakley Browne MA, McGee MA, Wells JE. Mentalphysical<br />
comorbidity in Te Rau Hinengaro: <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Mental Health Survey. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2006;40(10):882–8.<br />
4. Harris EC, Barraclough B. Excess mortality <strong>of</strong> mental disorder.<br />
Br J Psychiatry 1998;173:11–53.<br />
5. Osby U, Brandt L, Correia N, Ekbom A, Sparen P. Excess mortality<br />
in bipolar and unipolar disorder in Sweden. Arch Gen<br />
Psychiatry 2001;58(9):844–50.<br />
6. Weeke A, Juel K, Vaeth M. Cardiovascular death and manicdepressive<br />
psychosis. J Affect Disord 1987;13(3):287–92.<br />
7. Osby U, Correia N, Brandt L, Ekbom A, Sparen P. Mortality<br />
and causes <strong>of</strong> death in schizophrenia in Stockholm county,<br />
Sweden. Schizophr Res 2000;45(1-2):21–8.<br />
8. Brown S. Excess mortality <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia. A meta-analysis.<br />
British Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry 1997;171:502–8.<br />
9. Osborn DP, Levy G, Nazareth I, Petersen I, Islam A, King<br />
MB. Relative risk <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular and cancer mortality in<br />
people with severe mental illness from the United Kingdom’s<br />
<strong>General</strong> Practice Rsearch Database. Arch Gen Psychiatry<br />
2007;64(2):242–9.<br />
10. Enger C, Weatherby L, Reynolds RF, Glasser DB, Walker AM.<br />
Serious cardiovascular events and mortality among patients<br />
with schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004;192(1):19–27.<br />
11. Hennekens CH, Hennekens AR, Hollar D, Casey DE. Schizophrenia<br />
and increased risks <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular disease. Am<br />
Heart J 2005;150(6):1115–21.<br />
12. Lambert TJR, Velakoulis D, Pantelis C. Medical comorbidity in<br />
schizophrenia. Med J Aust 2003;178(9 (Suppl)):s67–s70.<br />
13. Kendrick T. Cardiovascular and respiratory risk factors and<br />
symptoms among general practice patients with long-term<br />
mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 1996;169(6):733–9.<br />
14. Davidson S, Judd F, Jolley D, Hocking B, Thompson S, Hyland<br />
B. Cardiovascular risk factors for people with mental illness.<br />
Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2001;35(2):196–202.<br />
15. Ryan MCM, Thakore JH. Physical consequences <strong>of</strong> schizophrenia<br />
and its treatment: the metabolic syndrome. Life Sci<br />
2002;71(3):239–57.<br />
16. Basu R, Brar JS, Chengappa KNR, John V, Parepally H,<br />
Gershon S, et al. <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> the metabolic syndrome<br />
in patients with schizoaffective disorder—bipolar subtype.<br />
Bipolar Disord 2004;6(4):314–8.<br />
17. Morriss R, Mohammed FA. Metabolism, lifestyle and bipolar<br />
affective disorder. J Psychopharmacol 2005;19(6_suppl):94–101.<br />
18. Tirupati S, Chua LE. Obesity and metabolic syndrome in<br />
a psychiatric rehabilitation service. Aust NZ J Psychiatry<br />
2007;41(7):606–10.<br />
19. Mackin P, Watkinson HM, Young AH. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> obesity,<br />
glucose homeostasis disorders and metabolic syndrome in psychiatric<br />
patients taking typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs: a<br />
cross-sectional study. Diabetologia 2005;48(2):215–21.<br />
20. Meyer JM, Koro CE. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> antipsychotic therapy<br />
on serum lipids: a comprehensive review. Schizophr Res<br />
20 04;70(1):1–17.<br />
21. <strong>New</strong>comer JW. Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics<br />
and metabolic effects: A comprehensive literature review.<br />
CNS Drugs 2005;19(SUPPL. 1):1–93.<br />
22. Ryan MCM, Flanagan S, Kinsella U, Keeling F, Thakore JH. <strong>The</strong><br />
effects <strong>of</strong> atypical antipsychotics on visceral fat distribution in<br />
first episode, drug-naive patients with schizophrenia. Life Sci<br />
2004;74(16):1999–2008.<br />
23. Sacchetti E, Turrina C, Parrinello G, Brignoli O, Stefanini<br />
G, Mazzaglia G. Incidence <strong>of</strong> diabetes in a general practice<br />
population: a database cohort study on the relationship with<br />
haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine exposure.<br />
Int J Clin Psychopharmacol 2005;20(1):33–7.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
24. Wang C-j, Zhang Z-j, Sun J, Zhang X-b, Mou X-d, Zhang X-r,<br />
et al. Serum free fatty acids and glucose metabolism, insulin<br />
resistance in schizophrenia with chronic antipsychotics. Biol<br />
Psychiatry 2006;60(12):1309–13.<br />
25. Wirshing DA, Boyd JA, Meng LR, Ballon JS, Marder SR, Wirshing<br />
WC. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> novel antipsychotics on glucose and<br />
lipid levels. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63(10):856–65.<br />
26. Zipursky RB, Gu H, Green AI, Perkins DO, Tohen MF, McEvoy<br />
JP, et al. Course and predictors <strong>of</strong> weight gain in people with<br />
first-episode psychosis treated with olanzapine or haloperidol.<br />
Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:537–43.<br />
27. Almeras N, Despres J-P, Villeneuve J, Demers M-F, Roy M-A,<br />
Cadrin C, et al. Development <strong>of</strong> an atherogenic metabolic risk<br />
factor pr<strong>of</strong>ile associated with the use <strong>of</strong> atypical antipsychotics.<br />
J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(4):557–64.<br />
28. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Health Strategy. Wellington,<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2000.<br />
29. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Mental Health Metabolic Working<br />
Group. Intervention Guide for Mental Health Service Users on<br />
Antipsychotic <strong>The</strong>rapy. Auckland: Janssen<br />
Cilag NZ Ltd; 2006.<br />
30. Walker RA, Martin S. Demographic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile for Waitemata<br />
District Health Board: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> 2006 Census. Auckland:<br />
Watemata District Health Board; 2007.<br />
31. Breum L, Astrup A, Gram L, Andersen T, Stokholm KH, Christensen<br />
NJ, et al. Metabolic changes during treatment with<br />
valproate in humans: implication for untoward weight gain.<br />
Metabolism 1992;41(6):666–70.<br />
32. Vendsborg PB, Bech P, Rafaelsen OJ. Lithium treatment and<br />
weight gain. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1976;53(2):139–47.<br />
33. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Mental Health Metabolic Working Group. A<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Mental Health Metabolic Working Group Initiative.<br />
Auckland: Janssen Cilag Ltd; 2006.<br />
34. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines Group. <strong>The</strong> assessment and management<br />
<strong>of</strong> cardiovascular risk: Evidence-based best practice<br />
guideline. Wellington: <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines Group<br />
(NZGG); 2003.<br />
35. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines Group. Management <strong>of</strong> Type 2<br />
Diabetes: Evidence-based best practice guideline. Wellington:<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines Group (NZGG); 2003.<br />
36. Wells JE, Browne MAO, Scott KM, McGee MA, Baxter J, Kokaua<br />
J. Te Rau Hinengaro: <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Mental Health Survey:<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> methods and findings. 2006;40(10):835–44.<br />
37. Wheeler A, Robinson E, Robinson G. Admissions to acute<br />
psychiatric inpatient services in Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>:<br />
a demographic and diagnostic review. N Z Med J<br />
2005;118(1226):U1752.<br />
38. Edmonds LK, Williams S, Walsh AE. Trends in Maori mental<br />
health in Otago. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2000;34(4):677–83.<br />
39. Baxter J, Kokaua J, Wells JE, McGee MA, Browne MAO. Ethnic<br />
comparisons <strong>of</strong> the 12 month prevalence <strong>of</strong> mental disorders<br />
and treatment contact in Te Rau Hinengaro: <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Mental Health Survey. 2006;40(10):905–13.<br />
40. Suppes T, McElroy SL, Hirschfeld RMA. Awareness <strong>of</strong> Metabolic<br />
Concerns and Perceived Impact <strong>of</strong> Pharmacotherapy in<br />
Patients with Bipolar Disorder: A Survey <strong>of</strong> 500 US Psychiatrists.<br />
Psychopharmacol Bull 2007;40(2):22–37.<br />
41. <strong>New</strong>comer JW, Nasrallah HA, Loebel AD. <strong>The</strong> Atypical<br />
Antipsychotic <strong>The</strong>rapy and Metabolic Issues National Survey:<br />
practice patterns and knowledge <strong>of</strong> psychiatrists. 2004;24(5<br />
Suppl 1):S1–6.<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
We would like to<br />
acknowledge the<br />
support <strong>of</strong> the MH<br />
practitioners and consumer<br />
representatives who were<br />
interviewed, piloted and<br />
who provided feedback<br />
in the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the survey. We<br />
also acknowledge the<br />
support <strong>of</strong> the DHBs<br />
and PHOs in distributing<br />
the survey. Finally, we<br />
are very grateful to the<br />
respondents for their time<br />
participating in the survey.<br />
COMPETING INTERESTS<br />
None declared.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 19
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
1 Muar District <strong>of</strong> Health,<br />
Muar, Johor, Malaysia<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Family<br />
Medicine, Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine, Universiti<br />
Kebangsaan Malaysia,<br />
Malaysia<br />
3 Department <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />
Universiti Kebangsaan<br />
Malaysia, Malaysia<br />
J PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2009;1(1):20–25.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO:<br />
Arshad Hanisah<br />
Family Medicine Specialist,<br />
Muar District <strong>of</strong> Health,<br />
Jalan Othman, 84000<br />
Muar, Johor, Malaysia<br />
ihanisah@hotmail.com<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne and its impact on the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life in school-aged adolescents<br />
in Malaysia<br />
Arshad Hanisah MMed (FamMed UKM); 1 Khairani Omar MMed (FamMed UKM); 2 Shamsul Azhar Shah 3<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
AIM: <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the prevalence <strong>of</strong> facial acne and its impact on the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life among adolescents attending secondary schools in Muar, Malaysia.<br />
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted where 409 samples were selected using stratified<br />
cluster random sampling from two secondary schools in Muar, involving Form 1 to Form 5 students.<br />
Students were diagnosed clinically and the severity <strong>of</strong> facial acne was assessed using Global Acne Grading<br />
System. A self-reported Cardiff Acne Disability Index was used to assess the quality <strong>of</strong> life among<br />
adolescents who had acne.<br />
RESULTS: <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> facial acne among the adolescents was 67.5% (n=276). Facial acne increased<br />
with increasing age (p=0.001). It was more common among males (71.1%) than females (64.6%),<br />
p=0.165. <strong>The</strong> males also had a higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> severe acne (p=0.001). <strong>The</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life was<br />
affected by the severity <strong>of</strong> acne. Students with severe acne had higher levels <strong>of</strong> Cardiff Acne Disability<br />
Index (rho=0.521).<br />
CONCLUSION: Facial acne is a common disorder and appears to have a considerable impact on quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> life among adolescents. <strong>The</strong> above findings should alert health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and the school<br />
authorities to actively identify, manage and educate adolescents with facial acne.<br />
KEyWORDS: Facial acne, adolescents, Cardiff Acne Disability Index, quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
Introduction<br />
Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological<br />
condition encountered in adolescents. It affects<br />
almost 85% <strong>of</strong> people 12–24 years <strong>of</strong> age. 1 It<br />
commonly affects young people during the time<br />
when they are undergoing maximum psychological,<br />
social and physical changes.<br />
Acne commonly involves the face. Facial appearance<br />
represents important aspects <strong>of</strong> one’s<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> body image. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is not<br />
surprising that a susceptible individual with<br />
facial acne may develop significant psychosocial<br />
disability. Emotional stress can also exacerbate<br />
acne, and patients with acne may develop<br />
psychiatric problems as a consequence <strong>of</strong> their<br />
problem. 2<br />
Skin disease can have a major impact on one’s<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life. Overall quality <strong>of</strong> life is an all<br />
inclusive concept incorporating all factors that<br />
impact upon an individual life. <strong>The</strong> concept<br />
can be divided into several components, including<br />
psychological, social and physical domains. 3<br />
<strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> acne on a particular patient is not<br />
always easy to judge clinically. It was found that<br />
both women and men find the effects <strong>of</strong> acne<br />
on appearance to be the most bothersome aspect<br />
<strong>of</strong> their disease and the negative effects <strong>of</strong> acne<br />
occur in both older and younger patients. 4 Even<br />
mild acne can pose a significant problem for some<br />
patients, diminishing their quality <strong>of</strong> life and in<br />
some cases their social functioning. 5,6<br />
Acne may also be associated with decreased selfesteem/self-confidence,<br />
interpersonal difficulties,<br />
20 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
unemployment and increased prevalence <strong>of</strong> anxiety<br />
and depression. 7,8 A study <strong>of</strong> 111 acne patients<br />
aged 16 years and over attending a United Kingdom<br />
dermatology outpatient clinic found levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> social and emotional problems are comparable<br />
with those in people with severe chronic disabling<br />
disease such as arthritis and epilepsy. 9<br />
However, the relationship between the severity<br />
<strong>of</strong> acne and emotional distress is poorly understood<br />
although it is known that acne is a source<br />
<strong>of</strong> distress and embarrassment. 10 <strong>The</strong>refore there<br />
is a need to study the psychosocial impact and<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> young people with acne<br />
using validated and age appropriate measures and<br />
an objective assessment <strong>of</strong> acne status. Thus the<br />
aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to determine the prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> acne and its impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> life in<br />
adolescents.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in two<br />
secondary schools in Muar, Malaysia. Muar is a<br />
district in one <strong>of</strong> the states in Malaysia. It has a<br />
multiethnic population. <strong>The</strong>re are about 17 secondary<br />
schools in the district. <strong>The</strong> two secondary<br />
schools were selected randomly. <strong>The</strong>se schools are<br />
co-educational schools which comprise Form 1 to<br />
Form 5 students.<br />
<strong>The</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> sample size was performed<br />
using Epi info Statistical Package, using the formula<br />
n=[ z / s ] 2 x p [ 1-p ], where n is a sample<br />
size, z is the confidence interval taken as 1.96, s<br />
is taken as 0.05 and p is the probability in this<br />
study and taken as prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne vulgaris in<br />
Malaysia which is about 85%. 11 Considering the<br />
drop <strong>of</strong>f rate as 10%, the minimum sample size<br />
calculated was 196. <strong>The</strong> sample size was then<br />
doubled to 400 due to stratified cluster sampling<br />
method.<br />
With the approval <strong>of</strong> the headmasters <strong>of</strong> the<br />
two secondary schools, the lists <strong>of</strong> students were<br />
obtained from the school registration books. <strong>The</strong><br />
study population was stratified into five strata<br />
based on their forms; Form 1 to Form 5. In each<br />
stratum, the samples were selected randomly. <strong>The</strong><br />
informed consent letter describing the research<br />
was given to the selected students and their par-<br />
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
What we already know: Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological<br />
condition encountered in adolescents, affecting them at a time when they<br />
are undergoing maximum psychological, social and physical changes. Acne<br />
can pose a significant problem for some patients, diminishing their social<br />
functioning and may be associated with decreased self-esteem/self-confidence,<br />
interpersonal difficulties, unemployment and increased prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
anxiety and depression.<br />
What this study adds: Facial acne is a common disorder and appears to<br />
have a considerable impact on quality <strong>of</strong> life among adolescents attending<br />
secondary schools, particularly in severe cases. Primary health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
and school authorities should actively identify, manage and educate<br />
adolescents on facial acne.<br />
ents. <strong>The</strong> students were excluded from the study<br />
if they or their parents refused to give consent.<br />
Absentees during the data collection day were<br />
also excluded from the study.<br />
On the data collection day, schools were visited<br />
by the researcher and school health nurse. Each<br />
student was examined for acne. In this study, the<br />
examination for acne included the head and neck<br />
only. All the manifestations <strong>of</strong> acne from comedone<br />
to nodules, not only by its presence but also<br />
number was reported. <strong>The</strong> acne severity was then<br />
graded using Global Acne Grading System. <strong>The</strong><br />
students with acne were then given self-reported<br />
Cardiff Acne Disability Index questionnaire.<br />
Clinical diagnosis was used to determine presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> acne. Facial acne was graded using<br />
the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS). 12<br />
<strong>The</strong> GAGS consider five locations on the face,<br />
with a factor at each location based roughly<br />
on surface area, distribution, and density <strong>of</strong><br />
pilosebaceous units. <strong>The</strong> borders on the face are<br />
delineated by the hairline, jaw line and ears.<br />
No magnifying glass or skin stretching was<br />
allowed, and good lighting was suggested. In<br />
this study all the manifestations <strong>of</strong> acne from<br />
comedones to nodules, not only by its presence<br />
but also number, were reported. Each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
location was graded separately on 0–4 scale,<br />
with the most severe lesion within that location<br />
determining the local score. <strong>The</strong> researcher<br />
then graded acne severity according to the<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 21
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
Table 1. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne among the adolescents<br />
Gender<br />
global score which is the summation <strong>of</strong> all local<br />
scores. <strong>The</strong> maximum score was 32.<br />
Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) is a wellvalidated<br />
self-reported questionnaire consisting<br />
<strong>of</strong> five questions with a Likert scale, four<br />
response categories (0–3). 13 <strong>The</strong> final score ranges<br />
from 0–15. <strong>The</strong> Cardiff Acne Disability Index is<br />
designed for use in teenagers and young adults<br />
with acne. <strong>The</strong> five questions relate to feeling <strong>of</strong><br />
aggression, frustration, interference with social<br />
life, avoidance <strong>of</strong> public changing facilities and<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> the skin—all over the last month—<br />
and an indication <strong>of</strong> how bad the acne was now.<br />
<strong>The</strong> CADI score was calculated by summing<br />
the score <strong>of</strong> each question resulting in a possible<br />
maximum <strong>of</strong> 15 and minimum <strong>of</strong> 0. CADI scores<br />
were graded as low (0–4), medium (5–9) and high<br />
(10–15). <strong>The</strong> lower the cumulative CADI score,<br />
the lower the level <strong>of</strong> disability experienced<br />
by the student while a higher score indicated<br />
a higher level <strong>of</strong> disability. <strong>The</strong> CADI identifies<br />
area <strong>of</strong> concern in patients with acne. <strong>The</strong><br />
patients’ response to the questionnaire is significantly<br />
correlated with the clinicians’ assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> acne severity.<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> acne No acne Total p value<br />
n % n % n %<br />
Male 128 71.1 52 28.9 180 100 0.165<br />
Female 148 64.6 81 36.4 229 100<br />
Age (years)<br />
13 31 44.2 39 55.7 70 100 0.001<br />
14 57 64.0 32 36.0 89 100<br />
15 54 66.7 27 33.3 81 100<br />
16 65 76.5 20 23.5 85 100<br />
17 60 81.0 14 19 74 100<br />
18 9 90.0 1 10 10 100<br />
Ethnicity<br />
Malay 155 64.3 86 35.7 241 100 0.084<br />
Chinese 121 72.5 46 27.5 167 100<br />
Total 276 67.5 133 32.5 409 100<br />
<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> students from age 13 to 18 years old had mild facial acne (90.2%)<br />
(refer table 2)<br />
Data was analysed using SPSS (Statistical Package<br />
for Social Studies) programme (version 11; SPSS<br />
Inc., Chicago). <strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> significance was set at<br />
p
<strong>The</strong>re was a significant difference between acne<br />
severity and gender (c 2 = 16.47, p=0.001). However,<br />
there was no significant difference between<br />
facial acne severity and ethnicity (c 2 = 1.56,<br />
p>0.05) (refer to Tables 4 and 5).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was a moderately strong correlation<br />
between facial acne severity and Cardiff Acne<br />
Disability Index (rho=0.521) at p=0.01 (Figure 1).<br />
(Correlation coefficient, rho0.8 very strong).<br />
<strong>The</strong> impact on quality <strong>of</strong> life increased with the<br />
facial acne severity.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was no association between CADI score<br />
and gender: Mann–Whitney test (z score=0.046,<br />
p=0.964). It is an important finding, as there may<br />
be a perception among some health pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
that facial acne will have less impact on males. It<br />
showed that males were also aware <strong>of</strong> their skin<br />
problems.<br />
Discussion<br />
This study showed that facial acne is a common<br />
problem among adolescents in Muar, affecting<br />
71.1% <strong>of</strong> boys and 64.6% <strong>of</strong> girls. A study done<br />
in Turkey using Global Acne Grading System,<br />
reported that the prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne among high<br />
school students was 23.1%. 14 <strong>The</strong> difference in<br />
prevalence rates between these two studies may<br />
reflect ethnic differences or the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
trunk examination which may limit participation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the adolescents. An Australian study showed<br />
that overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne was 36.1%. 15 In<br />
another study using Leeds Acne Grading Scale,<br />
reported the prevalence <strong>of</strong> acne in UK teenagers<br />
as 50%. 16 Comparisons <strong>of</strong> prevalence rate between<br />
studies are hampered by the varied methods <strong>of</strong><br />
acne grading used by different studies and the<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> diagnostic criteria used. For this<br />
reason, in this study it was best to report all the<br />
manifestations <strong>of</strong> acne from comedone to nodules,<br />
not only by its presence but also number.<br />
<strong>The</strong> researcher then graded acne severity according<br />
to the global score which is the summation <strong>of</strong><br />
all local scores. Again, there is no internationally<br />
agreed system for reporting severity, although<br />
various systems have been recommended. Nevertheless,<br />
Global Acne Grading System has been<br />
Table 2. Severity <strong>of</strong> facial acne by age, gender and ethnicity<br />
Age (years)<br />
Acne Severity Total<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 23<br />
Mild<br />
n (%)<br />
Moderate<br />
n (%)<br />
Severe<br />
n (%) n (%)<br />
13 29 (93.5) 2 (6.5) 0 (0) 31 (100)<br />
14 53 (93.0) 4 (7.0) 0 (0) 57 (100)<br />
15 47 (87.0) 4 (7.4) 3 (5.6) 54 (100)<br />
16 57 (87.7) 6 (9.2) 2 (3.1) 65 (100)<br />
17 55 (91.7) 3 (5.0) 2 (3.3) 60 (100)<br />
18 8 (88.9) 1 (11.1) 0 (0) 9 (100)<br />
Overall 249 (90.2) 20 (7.3) 7 (2.5) 276 (100)<br />
Gender<br />
Males 106 (82.8) 15 (11.7) 7 (5.5) 128 (100)<br />
Females 143 (96.6) 5 (3.4) 0 (0) 148 (100)<br />
Ethnicity<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
Malay 136 (87.7) 13 (8.4) 6 (3.7) 155 (100)<br />
Chinese 113 (93.4) 7 (5.8) 19 (0.8) 139 (100)<br />
Table 3. Specific responses <strong>of</strong> Cardiff Acne Disability Index<br />
Specific responses <strong>of</strong> CADI<br />
(N = 276)<br />
Frequency<br />
(n )<br />
Percentage<br />
(%)<br />
Felt aggressive, frustrated 196 71.0<br />
Social interference 162 58.7<br />
Avoidance <strong>of</strong> public changing 49 17.8<br />
Patient psychological state 225 81.9<br />
Subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> acne severity<br />
(perceived as problem)<br />
Table 4. Relationship between acne severity and gender<br />
251 90.9<br />
Acne severity Male (n) Female (n ) Test p value<br />
Mild acne 106 143 c2 = 16.47 0.001<br />
Moderate to severe acne 22 5<br />
TOTAL 128 148<br />
Table 5. Relationship between facial acne severity and ethnicity<br />
Acne severity Malay (n) Non-Malay (n) Test p value<br />
Mild acne 136 113 c2 = 1.56 0.21<br />
Moderate to severe acne 19 26<br />
TOTAL 155 139<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
found to be accurate and have minimal inter- and<br />
intra-rater variability. 11<br />
<strong>The</strong> findings in this study showed that acne prevalence<br />
increased with increasing age. This finding<br />
is similar to a previous study done in Australia. 14<br />
In this study, the male students were found to<br />
have more moderately severe acne compared to<br />
female students. <strong>The</strong> findings are consistent with<br />
previous studies done in other countries. 14,15,16,17<br />
Males tend to have more severe acne compared to<br />
females because they have oilier complexion and<br />
their androgen levels are higher. 18,19<br />
Cardiff Acne Disability Index helps to assess<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> life in students with acne. <strong>The</strong><br />
subscales include feeling <strong>of</strong> aggression, frustration,<br />
interference with social life, avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />
public changing facilities and appearance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
skin. In this study, analysis <strong>of</strong> the subscales<br />
showed that the adolescents had particular<br />
difficulties in the areas <strong>of</strong> emotion (felt aggressive,<br />
frustrated), social interference/difficulties<br />
and psychological state disturbance. A study<br />
among teenage Scottish schoolchildren reported<br />
that 50% <strong>of</strong> pupils were emotionally affected by<br />
their acne. Twenty percent <strong>of</strong> pupils were affected<br />
in their personal and social lives because<br />
Figure 1. Spearman’s rho coefficient demonstrating correlation between Global Acne<br />
Grading Score and Cardiff Acne Disability Index.<br />
<strong>of</strong> their acne and 10% avoided swimming and<br />
other sports because <strong>of</strong> embarrassment. 20 In<br />
this study, five students (1.8%) scored 13 in Cardiff<br />
Acne Disability Index which was equal to<br />
severely impaired. It implied that the students<br />
had severe psychological impact from facial acne<br />
problem. However, the median score <strong>of</strong> CADI<br />
was 4, which was low. This implied that overall<br />
the students were mildly affected psychologically.<br />
This could be due to the higher prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> mild acne among the students. It also showed<br />
that the impact <strong>of</strong> acne on the students was<br />
influenced by the acne severity.<br />
This study demonstrated a moderately strong correlation<br />
between the total score <strong>of</strong> Cardiff Acne<br />
Disability Index and acne severity. <strong>The</strong> impact<br />
on quality <strong>of</strong> life increased with the facial acne<br />
severity. This result is consistent with previous<br />
studies which also demonstrated a fairly good<br />
correlation between facial acne severity and<br />
Cardiff Acne Disability Index. 15,20,21 This implies<br />
that impact <strong>of</strong> acne on quality <strong>of</strong> life must be<br />
considered in the management <strong>of</strong> facial acne.<br />
Overall, there was no significant difference in<br />
the CADI score between the genders (Mann–<br />
Whitney test, p>0.5). <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> acne on<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life was similar between genders.<br />
However, this contradicts results from previous<br />
studies which found that girls generally experience<br />
more psychological morbidity than boys. 22<br />
<strong>The</strong> finding in this study is important as there<br />
may be perception among some health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
that facial acne will have less impact on males.<br />
This study showed that male adolescents were<br />
also aware <strong>of</strong> their skin problems.<br />
<strong>The</strong> major limitation <strong>of</strong> this study is its crosssectional<br />
design. A prospective study would be<br />
better to demonstrate a direct causal link between<br />
acne and quality <strong>of</strong> life. Although we obtained<br />
a good response rate, it is possible that students<br />
who either refused to take part or who were<br />
absent represent more vulnerable adolescents or<br />
those most embarrassed by their skin. <strong>The</strong> study<br />
is likely therefore to have underestimated the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> acne on quality <strong>of</strong> life. In this study,<br />
the CADI and GAG scores (especially the CADI)<br />
were quite skewed. Dichotomising the scores<br />
would perhaps demonstrate better results.<br />
24 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Conclusion<br />
Facial acne is common among adolescents and can<br />
cause major impact on their quality <strong>of</strong> life. It is important<br />
for the health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to incorporate<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life measurements when managing adolescents<br />
with acne. Cardiff Acne Disability Index<br />
is a useful tool to identify individual with facial<br />
acne who had poor quality <strong>of</strong> life. Health education<br />
is needed in our secondary schools to ensure<br />
that adolescents understand their disease, know<br />
what treatments are available and from whom they<br />
should seek advice. Health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals should<br />
be aware that early acne treatment can prevent<br />
progression <strong>of</strong> the disease and its complication.<br />
References<br />
1. Krowchuck DP. Managing Acne in Adolescent. Pediatr Clin<br />
North Am 2000;47(4):841–857.<br />
2. Koo JYM, Smith LL. Psychological aspects <strong>of</strong> acne. Pediatr J<br />
Dermatol 1991;8:185–188.<br />
3. Price P, Harding KG. Delining quality <strong>of</strong> life. J Wound Care<br />
1993;2:304–306.<br />
4. Jowett S, Ryan T. Skin disease and handicap: Analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> skin condition. Soc Sci Med 1985;20:425–429.<br />
5. Lasek RJ, Chren MM. Acne vulgaris and the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong><br />
adult dermatology patients. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:454–458.<br />
6. Picardi A, Abeni D, Melchi CF, Puddu P, Pasquini P. Psychiatri<br />
morbidity in dermatological outpatients: an <strong>issue</strong> to be recognized.<br />
Br J Dermatol 2000;143:983–991.<br />
7. Koo J. <strong>The</strong> psychosocial impact <strong>of</strong> acne: Patient’s perceptions.<br />
J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:26–30.<br />
8. Wu SF, Kinder BN. Role <strong>of</strong> anxiety and anger in acne patients:<br />
a relationship with severity <strong>of</strong> the disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol<br />
1988;18:325–332.<br />
9. Mallon E, <strong>New</strong>ton JN. <strong>The</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life in acne. J Am Acad<br />
Dermatol 1999;140:672–676.<br />
10. Lowe JG. <strong>The</strong> stigma <strong>of</strong> acne. Br J Hosp Med 1993;49:809–812.<br />
11. Khairani O, Zaiton S, Faridah MN. Do adolescents attending<br />
Bandar Mas Primary Care Clinic consult health pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
for their common health problems? Med J Malaysia<br />
2005;60(2):134–139.<br />
12. Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ. A comparison <strong>of</strong> current acne<br />
grading systems and proposal <strong>of</strong> novel system. Int J Dermatol<br />
1997;36:416–418.<br />
13. Motley RJ, Finlay AY. Practical use <strong>of</strong> disability index in the<br />
routine management <strong>of</strong> acne. Clin Exp Dermatol 1992;17:1–3.<br />
14. Atkan S, Ozmen E, Sanli B. Anxiety, depression and nature <strong>of</strong><br />
acne vulgaris in adolescents. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:354–357.<br />
15. Killkenny M, Merlin K. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> common skin condition<br />
in Australia school student: Acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1998;<br />
139:840–845.<br />
16. Smithard A, Glazebrook C, Williams HC. Acne prevalence,<br />
knowledge about acne and psychological morbidity in mid<br />
adolescence: A community base study. Br J Dermatol 2001;<br />
145:274–279.<br />
17. Stathakis V, Kilkenny M, Marks R. Descriptive epidemiology<br />
<strong>of</strong> acne vulgaris in the community. Australas J Dermatol<br />
1997;38:115–123.<br />
18. Lucky AW, Biro FM. Acne vulgaris in early adolescent boys<br />
correlation with pubertal maturation and age. Arch Dermatol<br />
1991;172:210–216.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
19. Burton JL, Cunliffe WJ, Stafford I, Shuster S. <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
acne vulgaris in adolescence. Br J Dermatol 1971;85:119–126.<br />
20. Walker N, Lewis Jones MS. quality <strong>of</strong> life and acne in Scottish<br />
adolescent children: use <strong>of</strong> the Children’s Dermatology Life<br />
quality Index (CDLqI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index<br />
(CADI). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:45–50.<br />
21. Motley RJ, Finlay AY. How much disability cause by acne. Clin<br />
Exp Dermatol 1989;14:194–198.<br />
22. Cotteril JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatological patients. Br<br />
J Dermatol 1997;137:246–250.<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Permission to use the Cardiff<br />
Acne Disability Index was<br />
obtained from Pr<strong>of</strong> Andrew<br />
Finlay, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Dermatology, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Wales <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />
Cardiff, UK and permission<br />
to use the Acne Management<br />
questionnaire was obtained<br />
from Dr Cris Glazebrook,<br />
Behavioural Section, Division<br />
<strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, queens Medical<br />
Centre, Nottingham, UK.<br />
COMPETING INTERESTS<br />
None declared.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 25
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice & Primary Health<br />
Care, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />
and Health Science, <strong>The</strong><br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Maori Health<br />
(Te Kupenga Hauora Maori),<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medical and Health<br />
Science, <strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong><br />
Auckland<br />
3 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia<br />
4 Department <strong>of</strong> Psychological<br />
Medicine, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Auckland<br />
5 Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />
J PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2009;1(1):26–29.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO:<br />
Bruce Arroll<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practice and<br />
Primary Health Care,<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medical and<br />
Health Sciences, <strong>The</strong><br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
PB 92019, Auckland,<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
b.arroll@auckland.ac.nz<br />
<strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression among Maori<br />
patients in Auckland general practice<br />
Bruce Arroll MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP; 1 Felicity Goodyear-Smith MBChB, MGP, FRNZCGP; 1 Ngaire Kerse<br />
MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP; 1 Melanie Hwang; 1 Susan Crengle MBChB FAFPHM (RACP); 2 Jane Gunn MBBS,<br />
PHD; 3 Tana Fishman DO, Am Osteo Bd Cert Fam Prac, FRNZCGP; 1 Simon Hatcher MBBS, MRCPsych,<br />
FRANZCP; 4 Sanat Pradhan MSc; 5 Karishma Sidhu MSc 5<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
INTRODUCTION: <strong>The</strong>re has been concern over high rates <strong>of</strong> mental illness in Maori. Previous studies in<br />
general practice have had small sample sizes.<br />
AIM: To determine the prevalence <strong>of</strong> major depression among Maori patients in Auckland general practice<br />
using the CIDI and the PHq as measurement tools.<br />
METHODS: This prevalence study is part <strong>of</strong> a larger randomised trial. <strong>The</strong> patients were recruited from<br />
77 general practitioners from around Auckland who could provide a private room for interviewing. <strong>The</strong><br />
patients were invited to participate in the waiting room and all consecutive patients were approached. For<br />
this study all patients received a computerised CIDI examination and one third received a PHq assessment<br />
prior to getting the CIDI. <strong>The</strong> interviewer was blind to the questionnaire results when the patient<br />
did the CIDI.<br />
RESULTS: <strong>The</strong>re were 7994 patients approached from whom there were data on 7432. <strong>The</strong> prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> Maori in the study was 9.7%. <strong>The</strong> overall 12-month prevalence <strong>of</strong> major depression based on the CIDI<br />
was 10.1% 95%CI (8.8 to 11.4). For Maori the prevalence was 11.5% 95%CI (8.8 to 14.2) and for non-<br />
Maori 10.1% 95%CI (8.6 to 11.3). For Maori men and Maori women the prevalence was 8.5% and 13.4%<br />
and for non-Maori men and non-Maori women it was 8.3% and 11.1%. <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression over<br />
at least the previous two weeks on the PHq ≥9 for all participants was 12.9% 95%CI (11.2 to 14.5).<br />
DISCUSSION: <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression among Maori is high, but not as high as earlier studies. This<br />
may be due to the bigger sample size <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />
KEyWORDS: Maori, prevalence, depression, primary care, general practice, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
Maori have had poorer mental health for decades<br />
while clear evidence has been collected in the<br />
last 20 years. 1,2 In particular, a concern about<br />
high rates <strong>of</strong> depression among Maori has been<br />
suggested, with few confirming studies. Increasingly,<br />
differences in mental health service use<br />
and clinical characteristics between different<br />
ethnic groups have been reflected in the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
statistics, while recent studies have found<br />
positive evidence <strong>of</strong> disparities between Maori<br />
and non-Maori populations at both primary and<br />
secondary levels <strong>of</strong> care. 3,4<br />
<strong>The</strong> most recent investigation on mental health<br />
in general practice found higher rates <strong>of</strong> major<br />
depression among Maori general practice attenders<br />
(46.4% in Maori while 15.4% in non-Maori<br />
in the last 12 months) 5 with the highest rates <strong>of</strong><br />
depression in female Maori patients (55.2%) and<br />
the greatest ethnological disparity between Maori<br />
and non-Maori women. However, these findings<br />
26 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
were based on a small number (n=81) <strong>of</strong> Maori<br />
respondents; therefore it is not clear how generalisable<br />
this information is. <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Mental Health survey was a national study which<br />
included 2595 Maori. <strong>The</strong> results from this community<br />
sample reported a mood disorder in Maori<br />
<strong>of</strong> 11.4% (12-month prevalence) versus 7.4% in the<br />
general population. 6<br />
Our study looks at the prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression<br />
among Maori patients in Auckland general<br />
practices in participants recruited as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />
randomised trial.<br />
Methods<br />
This paper uses data from a randomised control<br />
trial <strong>of</strong> the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), 7<br />
the Two Question With Help Questionnaire<br />
(TQWHQ) 8 and no screening in general practice.<br />
<strong>The</strong> PHQ has nine questions based on the DSM-<br />
IV. <strong>The</strong> TQWHQ is a three-question screening<br />
tool. This paper reports the prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression<br />
as detected in recruited participants. All<br />
participants completed the computerised CIDI<br />
(Composite International Diagnostic Interview)<br />
to evaluate the presence <strong>of</strong> depression as a gold<br />
standard. 9,10 <strong>The</strong> PHQ was administered to one<br />
third <strong>of</strong> the sample. RCT methodology and<br />
results will be reported in mid-2009.<br />
Recruitment <strong>of</strong> general practitioners<br />
All general practitioners in Auckland who<br />
worked greater than four-tenths in practice were<br />
eligible for the study. All eligible patients who<br />
gave informed consent were enrolled. A fee <strong>of</strong> $9<br />
per patient was paid to each GP to compensate for<br />
time spent asking the patient to meet with the<br />
interviewer, and reassessing patients found to be<br />
suicidal on the questionnaires. <strong>General</strong> practices<br />
in Auckland had to be able to provide a separate<br />
room for patient interviews. <strong>The</strong> study took place<br />
from 2006 to 2009.<br />
Recruitment <strong>of</strong> patients/index consultation<br />
Patients were eligible for the study if they were<br />
able to communicate in English, were aged over<br />
16 years, and were not suffering from any brain<br />
injury, dementia, terminal illness or intoxication.<br />
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS<br />
What we already know: Based on small studies, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression<br />
in Maori patients is high compared to non-Maori.<br />
What this study adds: <strong>The</strong> rates <strong>of</strong> depression in a larger group <strong>of</strong> Maori<br />
are high, but lower than previously estimated.<br />
Consecutive patients were approached in the waiting<br />
room and asked to participate in the study.<br />
Patients were recruited consecutively in order to<br />
obtain an adequate spectrum <strong>of</strong> disease as part <strong>of</strong><br />
screening and diagnostic test studies. After providing<br />
written informed consent they were asked<br />
to go to a private room to complete the study<br />
procedures. <strong>The</strong> interviewer was blind to the<br />
screening questionnaire results when the patients<br />
did the CIDI. <strong>The</strong> study was conducted according<br />
the principles <strong>of</strong> the STARD statement. 11<br />
Ethnicity was determined by self-selection as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the screening questionnaire based on the 2006<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> census. Individuals could pick more<br />
than one ethnicity. Those who chose Maori only<br />
or Maori in addition to other ethnicities were<br />
considered Maori and those who did not chose<br />
Maori at all were considered to be non-Maori. A<br />
subgroup analysis was conducted <strong>of</strong> those who<br />
chose only Maori.<br />
Ethics approval<br />
<strong>The</strong> methods and procedures used in this study<br />
were approved by the Northern Y Regional<br />
Ethics Committee, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. (Ethics<br />
approval number NTY/06/09/080).<br />
Statistical methods<br />
All statistical analyses were carried out using<br />
STATA data analysis and statistical s<strong>of</strong>tware version.<br />
<strong>The</strong> analysis was done using STATA v3 to<br />
take into account the effect <strong>of</strong> clustering by GP.<br />
Results<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
<strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> patients approached was 7994<br />
from whom there were 337 refusals (4.2%) and<br />
225 incomplete interviews (either patients did not<br />
complete the screening questionnaire or did not<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 27
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
get the CIDI). On average, 96 participants (range<br />
4–228) were recruited from each <strong>of</strong> 77 general<br />
practitioners and 67 <strong>of</strong> the GPs contributed Maori<br />
patients (average <strong>of</strong> 11 Maori per GP, range 1–48).<br />
<strong>The</strong> demographics are shown in Table 1 which<br />
shows that 9.7% <strong>of</strong> the sample were Maori and<br />
Maori patients were younger than non-Maori patients.<br />
Table 2 shows the major depression in the<br />
previous 12 months in terms <strong>of</strong> a Diagnostic and<br />
Statistical Manual (DSM) IV diagnosis reported<br />
on the CIDI computer and for PHQ score ≥ 9, 12<br />
and 14 (available on one third <strong>of</strong> participants). 12<br />
<strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression as recorded by the<br />
PHQ for more than two weeks is higher than<br />
the CIDI for the previous 12 months. A PHQ<br />
score ≥ 9 indicates major depression. A sensitivity<br />
analysis was conducted using those who chose<br />
Maori as their only ethnic group. This resulted<br />
Table 1. Demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> general practice attenders by ethnicity<br />
Overall<br />
n = 7432<br />
Maori<br />
n = 721<br />
Non-Maori<br />
n = 6711<br />
Mean age 49 39 50<br />
Median age 48 37 49<br />
Age range 16–99 16–82 16–99<br />
Gender<br />
Female 4460 (60%) 449 (62%) 4208 (63%)<br />
Male 2973 (40%) 272 (38%) 2504 (37%)<br />
in a slightly lower prevalence for only Maori (on<br />
CIDI) 9.6% versus 11.5% for all Maori for overall<br />
depression; 11.9% versus 13.4% for Maori women<br />
and 5.9% versus 8.4% for Maori men respectively.<br />
Discussion<br />
Our results show that depression is a significant <strong>issue</strong><br />
for Maori and consistent with the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Mental Health survey and the MaGPIe study,<br />
although the differences between Maori and non-<br />
Maori were not significantly different in our study.<br />
Qualitatively our results were lower than those<br />
reported in the MaGPIe study. A sensitivity<br />
analysis using those who chose Maori as their<br />
only ethnicity had a slightly lower prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
depression than with those who chose Maori and<br />
at least one other. <strong>The</strong> numbers are too small for<br />
interpretation to be made.<br />
<strong>The</strong> strengths <strong>of</strong> this study include the high<br />
response rate and the large number <strong>of</strong> Maori<br />
recruited from general practice. <strong>The</strong> methodology<br />
was simple with recruitment followed immediately<br />
by a computerised gold standard CIDI<br />
interview. Thus the PHQ findings and the CIDI<br />
findings are from the same day.<br />
A weakness <strong>of</strong> this study is that the GPs were<br />
not chosen randomly. However it was necessary<br />
Table 2. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression according to CIDI-DSM-IV major depressive disorder and PHQ scores among general practice attenders by gender<br />
and ethnicity. Proportion (95% confidence interval)<br />
Overall All non-Maori All Maori Non-Maori<br />
men<br />
28 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
Maori<br />
men<br />
Non-Maori<br />
women<br />
Maori<br />
women<br />
CIDI N = 7432 N = 6711 N = 721 N = 2697 N = 272 N = 4014 N = 449<br />
CIDI +ve* 10.1%<br />
(8.8, 11.4)<br />
10.1%<br />
(8.6, 11.3)<br />
11.5%<br />
(8.8,14.2)<br />
8.3%<br />
(6.9, 9.8)<br />
8.5%<br />
(4.7, 12.2)<br />
11.1%<br />
(9.5, 12.7)<br />
13.4%<br />
(10.2, 16.5)<br />
PHQ** N = 2497 N = 2240 N = 257 N = 903 N = 84 N = 1337 N = 173<br />
> 9 12.9%<br />
(11.2, 14.5)<br />
≥ 12 9.2%<br />
(7.7, 10.7)<br />
>14 5.2%<br />
(4.2, 6.2)<br />
12.6%<br />
(10.9, 14.2)<br />
9.0%<br />
(7.5, 10.5)<br />
* Positive for major depression in the last 12 months.<br />
15.2%<br />
(10.3, 20.0)<br />
11.3%<br />
(6.6, 15.9)<br />
10.2%<br />
(8.3, 12.1)<br />
** Sub-sample assessed with the PHq depression screen—relates to at least the past two weeks.<br />
( ) = 95% confidence interval adjusted for clustering by GP.<br />
11.9%<br />
(5.9, 17.9)<br />
12.7%<br />
(9.2, 16.2)<br />
16.8%<br />
(10.7, 22.7)
to have practices with a spare room available to<br />
conduct the gold standard interviews. <strong>The</strong> other<br />
weakness is that this study may be underpowered<br />
to find true differences. <strong>The</strong> CIDI has been criticised<br />
for use in surveys other than those wanting<br />
an epidemiological estimate. In one review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PHQ it was thought that a cut point <strong>of</strong> ≥ 12 for<br />
the PHQ may give a closer estimate to the CIDI. 13<br />
In our study a cut point <strong>of</strong> ≥ 12 would make a<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> 9.2% (on PHQ) versus 10.1% (CIDI)<br />
versus 12.9% with a cut point <strong>of</strong> ≥ 9. <strong>The</strong> PHQ<br />
relates to at least the previous two weeks while<br />
the CIDI can be the previous month to the previous<br />
year. It is not clear which is the better gold<br />
standard and further work may be required.<br />
<strong>The</strong> other NZ general practice study is the<br />
MaGPIe study. 5 It reported 12-month major<br />
depression prevalence rates for Maori women as<br />
55.2% (95%CI 33%–77.4%) and for Maori men as<br />
21.3% (95% CI 2.3%–40.3%). While the confidence<br />
interval estimates for Maori men in the MaGPIe<br />
study include our point estimate, the rate for<br />
women does not. <strong>The</strong> difference may lie in the<br />
different location (Wellington versus Auckland)<br />
or in the different sample sizes (MaGPIe n=81)<br />
and our study (721). <strong>The</strong>re have also been a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> national depression initiatives which<br />
may have reduced the burden <strong>of</strong> depression and<br />
the national unemployment rate was dropping<br />
until the final quarter <strong>of</strong> 2008. <strong>The</strong> other <strong>issue</strong><br />
is that <strong>of</strong> the methodology. <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe study<br />
screened patients with the GHQ (<strong>General</strong> Health<br />
Questionnaire) and then required the patient to<br />
return for a second interview. This more complicated<br />
methodology may have biased the results<br />
toward a higher prevalence estimate.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings on prevalence <strong>of</strong> depression<br />
were consistent with other studies investigating<br />
similar <strong>issue</strong>s overseas, as minority populations<br />
in other countries, including native Americans<br />
and US Hispanics, have higher rates <strong>of</strong> mental<br />
disorders 14,15 and the disparities were also shown<br />
in migrant populations in the United Kingdom. 16<br />
<strong>The</strong> picture <strong>of</strong> depression among Maori patients<br />
in general practice suggests that it is at least as<br />
high as that in non-Maori and most likely to be<br />
higher, particularly for women. <strong>The</strong> previous<br />
estimates may have overestimated the prevalence<br />
but it may be better to research interventions<br />
acceptable to and effective for Maori rather than<br />
obtaining a more precise estimate <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />
References<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
1. Durie M. Mental health and Maori development. ANZ J Psychiatry<br />
1999;33:5–12.<br />
2. Edmonds LK, Williams S, Walsh AES. Trends in Maori mental<br />
health in Otago. ANZ J Psychiatry 2000;36:677–683.<br />
3. Trauer T, Eagar K , GM. Ethnicity, deprivation and mental<br />
health outcomes. Aust Health Rev 2006;30(3):310–321.<br />
4. Bushnell J. Mental disorders among Maori attending their<br />
general practitioner. ANZ J Psychiatry 2005;39:401–406.<br />
5. <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe Research Group UoOaWSoMaHS. Mental disorders<br />
among Maori attending their general practitioner. ANZ J<br />
Psychiatry 2005;39:401–406.<br />
6. Oakley-Browne MA, Wells EJ, Scott KMe. Te Rau Hinengaro:<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> mental health survey. Wellington, <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2006.<br />
7. Nease DE, Malouin JM. Depression screening:a practical<br />
strategy. J Fam Pract 2003;52:118–26.<br />
8. Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Fishman T, Gunn J. Effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> a ‘help’ question to two screening questions<br />
on specificity for diagnosis <strong>of</strong> depression in general practice:<br />
diagnostic validity study. BMJ 2005;15 Sept 2005(http://bmj.<br />
com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.38607.464537.7Cv1?ecoll).<br />
9. Andrews G, Peters L, Guzman AM, Bird K. A comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN. Aust<br />
NZ J Psychiatry 1995;29:124–32.<br />
10. Peters L, Andrews G. Procedural validity <strong>of</strong> the computerised<br />
version <strong>of</strong> the Composite International Diagnostic<br />
Interview (CIDI-Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychol Med<br />
1995;25:1269–80.<br />
11. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou<br />
PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting<br />
<strong>of</strong> studies <strong>of</strong> diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ<br />
2003;326:41–4.<br />
12. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical<br />
manual <strong>of</strong> mental disorders (fourth edition) DSM-IV-TR. APA<br />
Washington, DC; 2000.<br />
13. Gilbody S, Richards D, Brealey S, Hewitt C. Screening for<br />
depression in medical settings with the Patient Health questionnaire<br />
(PHq): a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Genl Intl Med<br />
2007;22(11):1596–602.<br />
14. Lewis-Fernandez R, Das AK, Alfonso C, Weissman MM, Olfson<br />
M. Depression in US Hispanics: Diagnostic and Management<br />
Considerations in Family Practice. J Am Board Fam Pract<br />
2005;18:282–296.<br />
15. Office SGs. Mental Health: A Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Surgeon <strong>General</strong>.<br />
Washington, DC: Office <strong>of</strong> the Surgeon <strong>General</strong>; 1999.<br />
16. Bhugra D. Migration and depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica<br />
2003;Suppl 418:67–72.<br />
qUANTITATIVE RESEARCH<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
This study was funded<br />
by a grant from the<br />
Health Research Council<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
COMPETING INTERESTS<br />
None declared.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 29
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
MIXED METHOD RESEARCH<br />
1 School <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Otago, Dunedin,<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
2 Health Services Research<br />
Centre, Victoria University,<br />
Wellington<br />
3 Massey University, Albany,<br />
Auckland<br />
4 Maria’s HealthCare<br />
Pharmacy, Apia, Samoa<br />
J PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2009;1(1):30–35.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO:<br />
Pauline Norris<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Otago,<br />
Box 913, Dunedin<br />
pauline.norris@otago.ac.nz<br />
Understanding and use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics<br />
amongst Samoan people in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Pauline Norris MA, PhD; 1 Marianna Churchward; 2 Fuafiva Fa’alau; 3 Cecilia Va’ai 4<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
INTRODUCTION: Use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics is high in Samoa and this may affect the expectations and patterns<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibiotic use <strong>of</strong> Samoans in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
AIM: This study examined the understanding and reported use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics amongst Samoans in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
METHODS: In-depth interviews were held with 13 Samoans in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se interviews were<br />
analysed and used to develop a questionnaire that was administered to 112 Samoans attending health<br />
care facilities in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
RESULTS: Many participants had little understanding <strong>of</strong> antibiotics. Less than 2% identified the correct<br />
purpose for antibiotics, and 66% thought they were used to relieve pain. Respondents regarded a wide<br />
range <strong>of</strong> medicines (including some which they regularly took) as antibiotics. <strong>The</strong>y frequently attributed<br />
colds and flu to environmental conditions (96%), and regarded antibiotics as a useful treatment for them<br />
(81%). <strong>The</strong>y reported stopping taking antibiotics before finishing the course. Very few (8%) were aware <strong>of</strong><br />
antibiotic resistance.<br />
DISCUSSION: Health care practitioners cannot assume that patients share a Western scientific understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> which illnesses are caused by microbes, or what antibiotics are or do. People may have<br />
significant confusion about the medicines they take. Samoans, whether they are born in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> or<br />
not, may hold traditional Samoan views about health and illness.<br />
KEyWORDS: Antibiotics, lay knowledge, URTI (upper respiratory tract infections), Samoa, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
Antibiotic resistance is a serious and growing<br />
problem. 1-3 This is due to high overall use, but<br />
sub-optimal patterns <strong>of</strong> use, such as incomplete<br />
treatment courses, may also be important. 2<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are approximately 130 000 Samoans in<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>, <strong>of</strong> whom 60% were born in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>. 4 Pacific people in general, <strong>of</strong> whom 49%<br />
are Samoan, have shorter life expectancy, poorer<br />
health, higher rates <strong>of</strong> diabetes, higher mortality<br />
rates from cardiovascular disease and stroke than<br />
the general population. 5 <strong>The</strong>re are several reasons<br />
to assume that antibiotic use might be high<br />
amongst Samoans in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>. Pacific people<br />
have lower socioeconomic and health status and<br />
higher rates <strong>of</strong> infectious diseases than other<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>ers. 6 In the general population lower<br />
socioeconomic status is linked to higher rates <strong>of</strong><br />
infectious diseases 7,8 and higher use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics.<br />
9 In Samoa the use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics is high, and<br />
antibiotics are available without prescription from<br />
pharmacies. 10 This may affect Samoan people’s expectations<br />
<strong>of</strong> treatment and patterns <strong>of</strong> antibiotic<br />
use in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>. One clone <strong>of</strong> community-acquired<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphloccocus aureus<br />
has been labelled Western Samoan Phage Pattern<br />
(WSPP) MRSA, because its prevalence amongst<br />
Samoans and other Pacific Islanders suggests that<br />
it may have emerged in Samoa. 1 In addition, the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> traditional beliefs about health<br />
and illness may mean that Samoan people use<br />
antibiotics in ways that are not consistent with<br />
Western scientific beliefs.<br />
30 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Misunderstandings about antibiotics are common<br />
in a wide range <strong>of</strong> populations studied. 12-15 This<br />
study aimed to investigate understandings and use<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibiotics amongst Samoans in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
It did not aim to compare the level <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> Samoans and non-Samoans in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>,<br />
nor does it assume that Samoans have lower levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> knowledge than other <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>ers.<br />
Methods<br />
In-depth interviews were held with 13 Samoans<br />
in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> in 2005–2006. <strong>The</strong>se interviews<br />
were audio-taped, transcribed, and those<br />
in Samoan were translated into English. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
were coded and analysed using nVivo. <strong>The</strong>mes<br />
were developed from the aims <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> previous studies, and inductively<br />
from the interviews. Analysis was discussed<br />
amongst team members, and the material from<br />
the interviews was used to develop a questionnaire<br />
exploring knowledge and use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics.<br />
This questionnaire was administered to 112<br />
Samoans. All interviews (in-depth and questionnaire)<br />
were carried out by Samoan members <strong>of</strong><br />
the research team.<br />
Respondents for the in-depth interviews were<br />
identified through the researchers’ informal<br />
networks in Auckland and Wellington. Respondents<br />
for the questionnaire were identified<br />
through health services catering primarily to<br />
Pacific people in Auckland and Wellington. All<br />
Samoan patients using the clinic during the times<br />
when the researcher was present were invited to<br />
participate.<br />
Both in-depth interviews and the survey were<br />
carried out either in Samoan or English. <strong>The</strong> seven<br />
in-depth interviews in Samoan were translated<br />
into English. An identical questionnaire layout in<br />
Samoan and English was used, so that translation<br />
was not necessary for the questionnaire analysis.<br />
Ethical approval for the study was granted by<br />
Wellington and Auckland ethics committees<br />
(AKX/04/07/194). Informed consent was<br />
obtained from all participants. Information<br />
sheets and consent forms were provided in<br />
English or Samoan.<br />
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS<br />
What we already know: Many studies have shown gaps in public knowledge<br />
about antibiotics, but none have looked specifically at Samoans.<br />
What this study adds: Significant misunderstandings by Samoans living<br />
in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> are common. Primary health care practitioners should not<br />
assume that patients share their understandings <strong>of</strong> antibiotics or microbial<br />
illness.<br />
Results<br />
Semi-structured interviews<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the participants (11/13) were female<br />
and their ages ranged from 29 to 82 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age. Eight were born in Samoa, and five in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>. <strong>The</strong> semi-structured interviews revealed<br />
significant misunderstandings and lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibiotics. Some respondents consistently<br />
confused antibiotics with painkillers, while<br />
others had inconsistent understandings, which<br />
changed throughout the interview.<br />
Interviewer: What do you think antibiotics do?<br />
Participant: <strong>The</strong>y do—they heal don’t they?<br />
<strong>The</strong>y’re supposed to relieve the pain I guess.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were frequent confusions between antibiotics<br />
and other medication. One respondent,<br />
speaking <strong>of</strong> her nephew with epilepsy:<br />
Interviewer: Do you remember what medication<br />
he was on?<br />
Participant: He was definitely on some sort <strong>of</strong><br />
antibiotics but I have no idea what they were, I<br />
will have to ask my sister. I think it was two lots<br />
<strong>of</strong> different ones.<br />
Antibiotics were frequently confused with paracetamol<br />
and other analgesics. However, during<br />
the interviews they were also confused with allopurinol,<br />
epilepsy medication, topical NSAIDs,<br />
asthma inhalers, Indocid, fluoxetine, and a<br />
urinary alkaliniser. This sort <strong>of</strong> confusion was<br />
common even in respondents who told us that<br />
antibiotics were medicines to kill bacteria.<br />
MIXED METHOD RESEARCH<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 31
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
MIXED METHOD RESEARCH<br />
Figure 1. What do antibiotics do?<br />
Many respondents reported use <strong>of</strong> incomplete<br />
courses, and storing <strong>of</strong> leftover antibiotics.<br />
Respondent: I think the way my family uses<br />
antibiotics is typical.<br />
Interviewer: What do you mean by that?<br />
Respondent: <strong>The</strong>y use it and when they feel<br />
better they stop using them. And they will keep<br />
them for later use.<br />
A small number <strong>of</strong> respondents reported receiving<br />
advice about appropriate use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics<br />
from health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, which sometimes appeared<br />
to have changed their attitudes or behaviour.<br />
Some perceived that doctors in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
had become less likely to prescribe antibiotics:<br />
Interviewer: So who suggested that you take<br />
these…who decided that you should use them?<br />
Respondent: Usually the doctor, but that was in<br />
the time when they gave them out pretty freely,<br />
nowadays they’re not as generous with antibiotics<br />
I find…you even have to ask ‘could we have an<br />
antibiotic?’ and they would generally say ‘no, let<br />
your own system fight it’ and they will tell you<br />
to go home and drink lots <strong>of</strong> water and fluids.<br />
Respondents could select more than one option. If they selected both a correct option<br />
(‘kill bacteria’) and an incorrect one such as ‘relieve pain’, their answer was counted as<br />
incorrect. Respondents who chose the answer ‘kill bacteria’ with no other option, or ‘kill<br />
bacteria’ and ‘heal illnesses’ with no other option were classified as correct.<br />
A minority <strong>of</strong> respondents remembered being<br />
told to complete courses <strong>of</strong> antibiotics, and one<br />
knew from reading medicine labels:<br />
Respondent: I remember when I was given antibiotics<br />
I make sure I take them all before.<br />
Interviewer: Do you?<br />
Respondent: It always says on the thing that you<br />
make sure you take all your antibiotic until you<br />
finish it <strong>of</strong>f, yeah.<br />
Interviewer: And you do?<br />
Respondent: Yeah.<br />
Survey<br />
One hundred and twelve people completed the<br />
questionnaire; an approximate response rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> 84%. Fifty-three percent <strong>of</strong> the sample were<br />
female. Nine percent were under 20 years old,<br />
31% were between 20 and 40 years old, 36% were<br />
40 and 60, and 24% were over 60 years old. Most<br />
(83%) were born in Samoa, with the others born in<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> (17%). For those born in Samoa, the<br />
average length <strong>of</strong> residence in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> was<br />
14 years, with a range from six months to 40 years.<br />
Of those born in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>, only one had lived<br />
in Samoa for a short time. <strong>The</strong> others had either<br />
not been to Samoa, or only been for holidays.<br />
Only two <strong>of</strong> the 112 people interviewed gave a<br />
correct answer to the question ‘What do antibiotics<br />
do?’ Responses were categorised as correct<br />
if they were ‘kill bacteria’ or ‘kill bacteria’ and<br />
‘heal illness’, but no other responses. Although<br />
half the sample (49%) correctly stated that antibiotics<br />
kill bacteria, this was a less popular answer<br />
than ‘kill viruses’ (65%), ‘relieve pain’ (66%), and<br />
‘strengthen the immune system’ (54%). (Figure 1)<br />
Just over half the sample (54%) correctly identified<br />
antibiotics from a list <strong>of</strong> medicines. Amoxycillin<br />
was correctly identified as an antibiotic<br />
by 81% <strong>of</strong> the sample, and Augmentin by 80%.<br />
However, the other medicines listed: ‘metformin<br />
for diabetes’, ‘allopurinol for gout’, paracetamol,<br />
coldral/coldrex, asthma inhalers, were also identified<br />
as antibiotics (Figure 2).<br />
32 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Colds were more commonly attributed to environmental<br />
rather than microbial causes (96% vs 42%).<br />
Environmental causes were changes in the weather<br />
(92% <strong>of</strong> respondents), dust (57%) and getting cold<br />
(50%). Thirteen (20%) <strong>of</strong> those who thought that<br />
dust caused colds were born in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
Respondents were asked, ‘If you had a cold/<br />
fulu* for three days, with coughing, heavy nose,<br />
and headache, what would you do?’ Almost all<br />
respondents (99%) said they would see a doctor<br />
or nurse, and over half reported that they would<br />
take medicines (46%). Panadol or paracetamol<br />
was by far the most common medicine reported<br />
(51/56 medicines listed). Hot drinks (35%), rest<br />
(28%), and traditional Samoan f<strong>of</strong>o (29%) were<br />
also commonly reported responses.<br />
Participants were asked what medicines they had<br />
taken in the last month, and what for. Sixteen<br />
people identified antibiotics (amoxicillin, augmentin,<br />
doxycycline, penicillin) which they reported<br />
that they had taken for flu, lung infections,<br />
infected chest, sore throat, throat infections, fissures,<br />
‘bad flu’, knee injury, chest pain/infection,<br />
eczema, boils, and tonsillitis.<br />
Of the two people who reported taking allopurinol<br />
in the last month, one had earlier indicated<br />
that allopurinol was an antibiotic. Of the 11<br />
people who reported taking metformin, eight had<br />
earlier indicated that metformin was an antibiotic.<br />
All but one <strong>of</strong> these people gave very wide interpretations<br />
<strong>of</strong> what antibiotics did, saying that they<br />
relieved pain, strengthened the immune system,<br />
killed viruses and bacteria, and healed illness.<br />
Of the 57 people who reported taking paracetamol<br />
in the last month, three thought this was an<br />
antibiotic. None <strong>of</strong> these three thought antibiotics<br />
relieved pain. Two thought they killed bacteria,<br />
and two thought they killed viruses. Two took the<br />
paracetamol for flu and one for a headache.<br />
Eighty-one percent <strong>of</strong> the sample believed antibiotics<br />
were useful for colds and flu, and four<br />
percent were not sure. Antibiotics were believed<br />
to prevent colds and flu getting worse (68%), help<br />
people get better sooner (62%), relieve symptoms<br />
(57%), and prevent serious illness (35%).<br />
* ‘Fulu’ is Samoan for cold or flu.<br />
Figure 2. Which medicines are antibiotics?<br />
Forty-six percent <strong>of</strong> people said they would stop<br />
taking antibiotics when they got better (rather<br />
than when the course was finished). When asked<br />
what they would do with leftover antibiotics,<br />
54% said they would keep them, 46% said they<br />
would throw them out, and 3% said they would<br />
give them to someone else. No one said they<br />
would return them to a pharmacy.<br />
When asked if antibiotics have any bad effects,<br />
half <strong>of</strong> the sample were unsure, and 39% thought<br />
they did. <strong>The</strong> ‘bad effects’ identified were allergy<br />
(34% <strong>of</strong> the whole sample), diarrhoea (31%),<br />
thrush (14%), damaging the immune system<br />
(13%), germs getting used to antibiotics (8%),<br />
‘people start to dependent on them’ (3%), inability<br />
to drink alcohol (1%), and overdose (1%).<br />
Discussion<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
Respondents could select more than one option. Respondents’ answers were classified<br />
as correct if they chose ‘Amoxil/amoxycillin’ with no other option, or ‘Augmentin’ with<br />
no other option, or ‘Amoxil/amoxycillin’ and ‘Augmentin’ with no other option. If, for<br />
example, a respondent said panadol and amoxil were antibiotics, their answer was<br />
counted as ‘incorrect’.<br />
Both the in-depth interviews and the questionnaire<br />
suggest that many Samoan people have<br />
little understanding <strong>of</strong> antibiotics, and regard<br />
a wide range <strong>of</strong> medicines as antibiotics (even<br />
medicines they have personal experience <strong>of</strong>). <strong>The</strong><br />
responses suggest that Samoan people frequently<br />
MIXED METHOD RESEARCH<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 33
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
MIXED METHOD RESEARCH<br />
attribute colds and flu to environmental conditions,<br />
rather than microbes. <strong>The</strong>y regard antibiotics<br />
as a useful treatment for colds and flu,<br />
frequently stop taking them before finishing<br />
the course, and very few are aware <strong>of</strong> antibiotic<br />
resistance. Ironically, stopping taking antibiotics<br />
‘prematurely’ for those with a common cold will<br />
probably reduce resistance while such behaviour<br />
could be harmful for diseases with serious consequences<br />
such as streptococcal tonsillitis (and its<br />
relation to rheumatic fever).<br />
<strong>The</strong> survey involved a small sample <strong>of</strong> people<br />
who were visiting health care practitioners. <strong>The</strong><br />
interview process was very time-consuming and<br />
so the sample size <strong>of</strong> 112 was decided by practical<br />
constraints rather than a power calculation. Thus<br />
caution should be used when extrapolating to the<br />
general Samoan population, and further research<br />
is needed. However, this is the first information<br />
available on Samoan knowledge and understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibiotics. <strong>The</strong>re were some difficulties<br />
in translating the terms ‘bacteria’ and ‘virus’ into<br />
It cannot be assumed that patients share Western<br />
scientific understandings about which illnesses are<br />
caused by microbes, which illnesses are viral, and<br />
which are bacterial, or what antibiotics are or do<br />
Samoan, so caution should also be used in interpreting<br />
results concerning these.<br />
Studies overseas have also found misconceptions<br />
and lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about antibiotics. For example,<br />
8% <strong>of</strong> people interviewed in 1976 thought<br />
aspirin was an antibiotic 12 and only half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents in another knew that codeine was<br />
not an antibiotic and some thought Robitussin<br />
was an antibiotic. 13<br />
<strong>The</strong> interviews reported here are part <strong>of</strong> a larger<br />
study looking at knowledge and use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics<br />
amongst Samoan people in Samoa and <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>. In Samoa itself, participants reported<br />
routine use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics for colds and flu. This<br />
seems to be encouraged by prescribing patterns.<br />
Antibiotics are also available without prescription<br />
from pharmacies. 10<br />
<strong>The</strong> belief that exposure to cold and changes in<br />
weather can cause colds may also be common in<br />
Western cultures. 16 However, to our knowledge,<br />
the belief that dust causes colds and flu has not<br />
been reported elsewhere, although it may have<br />
been part <strong>of</strong> medical orthodoxy some time ago. 17<br />
In this study, Samoans born in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
were just as likely to report this belief as those<br />
born in Samoa. This suggests that health care<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals cannot assume that <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>–<br />
born Samoans completely share Western ideas<br />
about health.<br />
A previous study found that 42% <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
<strong>of</strong> a <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> town had taken antibiotics<br />
in the last year. 9 In this study, 14% reported<br />
taking antibiotics in the last month. It is difficult<br />
to compare these numbers because the survey<br />
was administered with a sample <strong>of</strong> those visiting<br />
health care providers, rather than a general<br />
population sample.<br />
Curry et al. found that most people taking<br />
antibiotics for URTI believe that they help<br />
symptoms (85%) and shorten the course <strong>of</strong> URTI<br />
(80%). 14 Respondents in our study <strong>of</strong> Samoan<br />
people also commonly believe that antibiotics<br />
have these effects, and they also believe antibiotics<br />
prevent URTIs getting worse, and prevent<br />
serious illness.<br />
Respondents in our study <strong>of</strong> Samoan people<br />
reported a very high level <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> health care<br />
providers for colds/flu (99% said they would see<br />
a doctor or nurse for a cold lasting three days). In<br />
contrast, Curry et al. reported that only 15% <strong>of</strong><br />
their general population–based sample said they<br />
would usually see a doctor about an URTI. 14<br />
This study provides several messages for health<br />
care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. It cannot be assumed that<br />
patients share Western scientific understandings<br />
about which illnesses are caused by microbes,<br />
which illnesses are viral, and which are bacterial,<br />
or what antibiotics are or do. People may have<br />
significant confusions about what the medicines<br />
they take actually do. Even Samoans who are<br />
34 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
orn in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> may hold traditional Samoan<br />
views about health and illness, rather than<br />
Western ones. However there is some evidence<br />
that explanations about appropriate use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics<br />
given by individual doctors and pharmacists<br />
make a difference.<br />
While the results show the need for targeted<br />
health promotion about antibiotics in the Samoan<br />
community, they also suggest that caution is<br />
needed. Because many Samoan people were unable<br />
to distinguish antibiotics from other medicines,<br />
there is a risk that they may reduce use <strong>of</strong><br />
other essential medicines, such as metformin if<br />
they are warned about the dangers <strong>of</strong> antibiotic<br />
use. Messages about appropriate (non-antibiotic)<br />
management <strong>of</strong> colds and flu, building on existing<br />
culturally-based practices, would be safest<br />
strategy in this context.<br />
References<br />
1. Standing Medical Advisory Committee Sub-Group on Antimicrobial<br />
Resistance. <strong>The</strong> Path <strong>of</strong> Least Resistance. Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health (UK); 1998.<br />
2. World Health Organization. WHO Global Strategy for Containment<br />
<strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Resistance. WHO; 2001.<br />
3. Ellis-Pegler R. Editorial: Antimicrobial resistance—can we,<br />
should we do anything about it? NZ Med J 1999;112:249–351.<br />
4. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health NZ. Tagata Pasifika—Pacific Health. <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2007.<br />
5. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health NZ. Pacific People’s Health. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>:<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2007.<br />
6. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health NZ. Pacific Health: Pacific People’s Health.<br />
7. Davey Smith G, Neaton J, Wentworth D, Stamler R, Stamler<br />
J. Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men<br />
screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial:<br />
Part 1—results for 300,685 white men. Am J Public Health<br />
1996;86:486–96.<br />
8. Salmond C, Crampton P. Deprivation and health. In: Howden-<br />
Chapman P, Tobias M, editors. Social inequalities in health:<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> 1999. Wellington: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2000.<br />
9. Norris P, Ecke D, Becket G. Demographic Variation in the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibiotics in a <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> town. NZ Med J 2005;118.<br />
10. Norris P, Nguyen H. Consumption <strong>of</strong> antibiotics in a small Pacific<br />
Island nation: Samoa. Pharmacy Practice 2007. 5: http://<br />
www.pharmacypractice.org/vol05/01/toc.htm.<br />
11. Smith S, Cook G. A decade <strong>of</strong> community MRSA in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>. Epidemiol Infect 2005;1–6.<br />
12. Chandler D, Dougdale A. What do patients know about antibiotics?<br />
Lancet 1976;2:422.<br />
13. Hong J, Philbrick J, Schorling J. Treatment <strong>of</strong> upper respiratory<br />
infections: do patients really want antibiotics? Am J Med<br />
1999;107:511–515.<br />
14. Curry M, Sung L, Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Norris<br />
P. Public views and use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics for the common cold<br />
before and after an education campaign in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>. NZ<br />
Med J 2006;119.<br />
15. Eng JV, Marcus R, Hadler JL, Imh<strong>of</strong>f B, Vugia DJ, Cieslak PR,<br />
Zell E, Deneen V, McCombs KG, Zansky SM, Hawkins MA,<br />
Besser RE. Consumer attitudes and use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics. Emerg<br />
Infect Dis 2003;9:1128–1135.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
16. Lee GM, Friedman JF, Ross-Degnan D, Hibberd PL,Goldmann<br />
DA. Misconceptions about colds and predictors <strong>of</strong> health<br />
service utilization 10.1542/peds.111.2.231. Pediatrics 2003;<br />
111:231–236.<br />
17. Neuwelt L. How to avoid colds. Am J Nurs 1918;18:371–373.<br />
MIXED METHOD RESEARCH<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
We wish to thank the<br />
Health Research Council <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> for funding<br />
the study, the health care<br />
providers who allowed us<br />
to interview their patients,<br />
and the participants.<br />
COMPETING INTERESTS<br />
None declared.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 35
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
1 Section <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology<br />
& Biostatistics, School <strong>of</strong><br />
Population Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Medical and Health Science,<br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice and Primary Health<br />
Care, School <strong>of</strong> Population<br />
Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />
and Health Science, <strong>The</strong><br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
3 School <strong>of</strong> Rehabilitation and<br />
Occupation Studies, AUT<br />
University, Auckland<br />
J PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2009;1(1):36–41.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO:<br />
Gillian Robb<br />
Section <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology<br />
& Biostatistics, School<br />
<strong>of</strong> Population Health,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />
Private Bag 92019,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
g.robb@auckland.ac.nz<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> an evidence-based guideline<br />
on s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and related<br />
disorders—Part 1: Assessment<br />
Gillian Robb MPH (Hons), Dip Physiotherapy, Dip Ergonomics; 1 Bruce Arroll MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP; 2 Duncan<br />
Reid MHSc (Hons), PGD (Manip Physiotherapy), MNZCP; 3 Felicity Goodyear-Smith MBChB, MGP, FRNZCGP 2<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
AIM: To provide a succinct summary <strong>of</strong> the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries to the shoulder for primary<br />
health care practitioners based on the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> guideline.<br />
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed the guideline by critically appraising and grading<br />
retrieved literature using the Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology (GATE). Recommendations were<br />
derived from resulting evidence tables.<br />
RESULTS: Diagnostic ultrasound is a valid tool for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a full thickness rotator cuff tear. If<br />
a significant tear is suspected, referral for diagnostic ultrasound is recommended. <strong>The</strong>re is a paucity <strong>of</strong><br />
evidence for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and most recommendations are based on the<br />
consensus <strong>of</strong> the guideline team.<br />
CONCLUSION: Assessment relies on thorough history-taking and physician examination with appropriate<br />
referral where there is evidence <strong>of</strong> serious damage or the diagnosis remains unclear.<br />
KEyWORDS: Shoulder, shoulder pain, diagnosis, s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries<br />
Introduction<br />
S<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries rank within the top<br />
three injury sites for nearly all major sport and<br />
recreational activities. 1 Not only do they represent<br />
a significant cost to the Accident Compensation<br />
Corporation (ACC), if poorly managed they can<br />
result in significant disability and loss <strong>of</strong> quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> life. In 2003 ACC commissioned a guideline<br />
for the diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong> common<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries to reduce identified<br />
variation in diagnosis and management and to<br />
improve outcomes for claimants. 2<br />
<strong>The</strong> diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong> shoulder<br />
injuries is one <strong>of</strong> the most challenging areas <strong>of</strong><br />
musculoskeletal medicine. Pathologies and their<br />
clinical manifestations vary widely from person<br />
to person and pathologies <strong>of</strong>ten co-exist, further<br />
compounding the diagnostic complexity.<br />
This paper is the first <strong>of</strong> a two-part series which<br />
summarises the evidence for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries based on the evidencebased<br />
guideline <strong>The</strong> diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and related disorders. 2<br />
This guideline was developed in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
(NZ), led by Effective Practice, Informatics &<br />
Quality improvement (EPIQ), University <strong>of</strong><br />
Auckland under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Guidelines Group (NZGG). <strong>The</strong> guideline was<br />
endorsed by the <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>General</strong> Practitioners, the NZ Orthopaedic Asso-<br />
36 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
ciation, the NZ Society <strong>of</strong> Physiotherapists Inc.,<br />
the NZ Association <strong>of</strong> Musculoskeletal Medicine,<br />
Sports Medicine NZ and the <strong>Royal</strong> Australasian<br />
and <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> Radiologists.<br />
<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to provide a succinct<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> the assessment <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries<br />
to the shoulder in a form that is readily accessible<br />
to primary health care practitioners.<br />
Method<br />
<strong>The</strong> target group for the guideline is primary<br />
care practitioners. In NZ this group includes<br />
primary care medical practitioners, physiotherapists<br />
and osteopaths who are able to assess s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
t<strong>issue</strong> injuries <strong>of</strong> the shoulder and decide initial<br />
management.<br />
A broad-based multidisciplinary team (orthopaedic<br />
surgery, general practice, musculoskeletal<br />
radiology, musculoskeletal medicine, sports<br />
medicine, emergency medicine, physiotherapy,<br />
osteopathy) was convened in 2003, including<br />
nominated pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and representatives for<br />
Maori, Pacific people and consumers.<br />
<strong>The</strong> team met on two occasions over a 12-month<br />
period. <strong>The</strong>re were numerous consultations<br />
between members <strong>of</strong> the group throughout the<br />
guideline process, including several additional<br />
small group meetings to discuss various aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> the guideline.<br />
This guideline summary addresses the diagnosis<br />
and referral <strong>of</strong> adults with the following<br />
shoulder injuries. Adolescents were also included<br />
for shoulder instabilities given that dislocation<br />
and recurrent dislocation are more common in<br />
this age group. Five pathological groupings were<br />
considered as reflective <strong>of</strong> the main s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong><br />
disorders seen in primary care. <strong>The</strong>se were:<br />
1. Rotator cuff disorders (including<br />
impingement, subacromial bursitis, tendinosis,<br />
painful arc syndrome, partial, full thickness<br />
and massive tears <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff, long<br />
head <strong>of</strong> biceps rupture and calcific tendonitis)<br />
2. Frozen shoulder (also known as adhesive<br />
capsulitis)<br />
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS<br />
What we already know: Shoulder injuries are both common and difficult<br />
to diagnose.<br />
What this study adds: <strong>The</strong> evidence base to diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong><br />
injuries to the shoulder is limited. This review <strong>of</strong>fers recommendations largely<br />
based on expert consensus. Assessment relies on thorough history-taking<br />
and physician examination, with appropriate referral where there is evidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> serious damage or the diagnosis remains unclear.<br />
3. Glenohumeral instabilities (acute and<br />
recurrent dislocation, labral injuries and other<br />
instabilities)<br />
4. Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries<br />
(including stress osteolysis, osteoarthritis and<br />
dislocation)<br />
5. Sternoclavicular (SC) joint injuries (including<br />
sprains, dislocation and arthritis and related<br />
conditions).<br />
<strong>The</strong> guideline specifically excluded fractures, inflammatory<br />
conditions, degenerative conditions,<br />
endocrinological and neurological conditions,<br />
hemiplegic shoulder and chronic shoulder pain<br />
including occupational overuse disorders.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following diagnostic and referral questions<br />
were considered by the team:<br />
• What aspects <strong>of</strong> the history are<br />
diagnostic—e.g. mechanisms <strong>of</strong> injury;<br />
a sensation <strong>of</strong> ‘popping out’?<br />
• What symptoms are diagnostic, e.g.<br />
location <strong>of</strong> pain; dead arm?<br />
• What aspects <strong>of</strong> the clinical examination /<br />
specific tests are valid and reliable for the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> the included shoulder conditions?<br />
• What are the red flags?<br />
• What imaging is appropriate to<br />
use in making the diagnosis?<br />
• What are the appropriate plain films to use<br />
in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries?<br />
• What is the place <strong>of</strong> diagnostic ultrasound?<br />
• What are the indications for referral<br />
for further evaluation?<br />
For each question a comprehensive literature<br />
search was undertaken in all major electronic<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 37
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
data bases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE,<br />
AMED, SPORTdiscus and Current Contents).<br />
Relevant Internet sites were searched, including<br />
PEDro, NHS clinical trials, Health Technology<br />
Assessments for NHS, Bandolier and National<br />
Guideline Clearing House. Reference lists <strong>of</strong><br />
included studies were checked for additional<br />
studies. Only published studies in the English<br />
language were considered for inclusion.<br />
Quality was assessed using the Generic Appraisal<br />
Tool for Epidemiology (GATE) available at: http://<br />
www.epiq.co.nz (modified since this guideline<br />
was developed).<br />
Diagnostic studies were included only if they had<br />
at least 35 or more participants which represented<br />
an appropriate spectrum or defined clinical group,<br />
included blind independent assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
new test and reference standard and compared the<br />
reference test with the new test in at least 90% <strong>of</strong><br />
people.<br />
Evidence from the relevant studies was summarised<br />
into evidence tables (http://www.nzgg.<br />
org.nz/guidelines/0083/040610_Final_Guideline_methodology_and_evidence_tables_<br />
dia%E2%80%A6.pdf ). Recommendations were developed<br />
using the SIGN ‘Considered Judgement’<br />
process. (SIGN Guideline development process:<br />
http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/<br />
compjudgement.html).<br />
Table 1. Evidence summary—diagnosis<br />
Evidence summary<br />
Grading is based on the strength <strong>of</strong> the evidence<br />
and does not indicate the relative importance <strong>of</strong><br />
the recommendations.<br />
Results<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a paucity <strong>of</strong> evidence for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries. Recommendations<br />
have therefore been based primarily on the<br />
consensus <strong>of</strong> the guideline development team<br />
(Table 1).<br />
Routine x-rays and diagnostic ultrasound are<br />
the imaging techniques available to NZ primary<br />
health care practitioners. Referral to a specialist is<br />
required for other diagnostic imaging procedures<br />
including MRI and MR arthrography, which<br />
are the additional diagnostic imaging techniques<br />
most commonly used for s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries <strong>of</strong><br />
the shoulder. <strong>The</strong> evidence for these modalities<br />
has therefore not been included for this summary.<br />
‘A’ recommendation for the diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries<br />
Diagnostic ultrasound<br />
If a significant rotator cuff tear is suspected, refer<br />
for diagnostic ultrasound. Diagnostic ultrasound<br />
should be undertaken by a radiologist with appropriate<br />
expertise using equipment with sufficient<br />
resolution.<br />
History <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that any particular aspect <strong>of</strong> the history is both reliable and valid for<br />
the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> any shoulder injury.<br />
Physical examination <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that any specific diagnostic test is both valid and reliable for the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> any s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injury.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that any particular combination <strong>of</strong> tests is useful in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
shoulder disorders.<br />
Radiography No validated clinical decisions rules were located for the use <strong>of</strong> plain radiography for s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries.<br />
Diagnostic ultrasound <strong>The</strong>re is good evidence that diagnostic ultrasound is a valid diagnostic tool in the diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> full thickness rotator cuff tears in a secondary care setting with a likelihood ratio <strong>of</strong> 13.6<br />
(95% CI 9.13-18.95). 5<br />
Its ability to rule out rotator cuff disease is yet to be determined and there is no conclusive<br />
evidence for the validity <strong>of</strong> diagnostic ultrasound in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> partial tears. 5<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is insufficient evidence to determine the validity <strong>of</strong> diagnostic ultrasound for rotator<br />
cuff tears in a primary care setting.<br />
38 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Consensus recommendations for the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries<br />
1. Carry out a full clinical assessment, including<br />
a neurological examination if required<br />
<strong>The</strong> clinical manifestations <strong>of</strong> shoulder disorders<br />
are many and varied. A thorough clinical<br />
examination will help establish an accurate and<br />
definitive diagnosis (Table 2).<br />
2. Exclude red flags and other significant<br />
structural damage<br />
People with red flags and other significant structural<br />
damage require urgent referral to a specialist<br />
(Table 3).<br />
3. Screen for extrinsic causes <strong>of</strong> shoulder pain<br />
<strong>The</strong> site <strong>of</strong> pain may not be the source <strong>of</strong> the<br />
problem. Noting the onset, periodicity, site, character,<br />
radiation, associated symptoms and relieving<br />
and aggravating factors will alert the clinician<br />
to the severity <strong>of</strong> the disorder and the possible<br />
source <strong>of</strong> pain (Table 4). Provide appropriate treatment<br />
or refer to a specialist for further evaluation<br />
and management.<br />
4. Establish a provisional diagnosis<br />
<strong>The</strong> clinical diagnosis <strong>of</strong> shoulder disorders is<br />
difficult. <strong>The</strong>re is <strong>of</strong>ten overlap between commonly<br />
described conditions and variation in<br />
presentation <strong>of</strong> symptoms. <strong>The</strong> following key<br />
points should be kept in mind when diagnosing<br />
acute s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder disorders:<br />
• Rotator cuff disorders:<br />
– Age >35 years<br />
– Upper arm pain/night pain<br />
– Painful arc<br />
– Limited active range <strong>of</strong> movement (ROM)<br />
– Full passive ROM<br />
– Possible weakness<br />
– +ve impingement sign.<br />
• Frozen shoulder<br />
– Gradual onset<br />
– Increasing severity <strong>of</strong> pain<br />
– Global limitation active and passive ROM<br />
– Possible diabetic<br />
Table 2. Clinical assessment <strong>of</strong> the shoulder<br />
History<br />
Inquiry Key Features Consider<br />
Age >35 year<br />
< 35 years<br />
Mechanism <strong>of</strong> injury Fall/direct trauma<br />
Fall onto point <strong>of</strong> shoulder<br />
Abduction/external<br />
rotation<br />
Head away (traction)<br />
Pain location/<br />
radiation<br />
Physical examination<br />
Above shoulder joint<br />
Upper arm/deltoid<br />
Anterior upper arm<br />
Below elbow (shooting)<br />
Night Pain<br />
Rotator cuff<br />
Instability<br />
Clavicle fracture<br />
AC joint<br />
Rotator cuff/dislocation<br />
Brachial Plexus<br />
AC Joint<br />
Rotator cuff<br />
Biceps tendonitis<br />
Nerve/neck<br />
Rotator cuff tendon<br />
Action Key features Consider<br />
Look Asymmetry/deformity<br />
Wasting<br />
Bruising<br />
Scars<br />
Feel SC joint/clavicle/AC joint<br />
Long head biceps<br />
Greater tuberosity<br />
Spine <strong>of</strong> scapula<br />
Test active ROM Limited active/full passive<br />
Painful arc<br />
Test passive ROM Limited active and passive<br />
Hypermobile/positive<br />
apprehension<br />
Test strength Weak abduction/wasting<br />
deltoid<br />
Weak abduction/external<br />
rotation<br />
Weak internal rotation<br />
Dislocation/fracture/AC joint<br />
dislocation<br />
Rotator cuff tear/nerve injury<br />
Dislocation/fracture<br />
Previous injury/surgery<br />
Local tenderness/prominence<br />
Local tenderness bicipital<br />
groove<br />
Local tenderness/fracture<br />
Local tenderness/fracture<br />
Rotator cuff disorder<br />
(impingement/tear)<br />
Rotator cuff disorder<br />
Frozen shoulder<br />
Instability<br />
Axillary nerve injury<br />
(dislocation)<br />
Rotator cuff tear<br />
Subscapularis/pectoralis<br />
major tear<br />
Special tests <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that any specific test is both valid and<br />
reliable for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> shoulder injuries.<br />
Neurological examination<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
Level Motor Sensory Reflex<br />
C5 Deltoid/biceps Upper arm Biceps<br />
C6 Wrist extension Thumb Brachioradialis<br />
C7 Wrist extension/finger extension Middle finger Triceps<br />
C8 Finger grip Fifth finger None<br />
T1 Hand intrinsics Medial elbow None<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 39
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
• Anterior/recurrent dislocation<br />
– History <strong>of</strong> trauma<br />
– Pain and muscle spasm<br />
– Empty space below acromion<br />
– Humeral head anterior<br />
– Limited movement<br />
– Plus/minus +ve x-ray confirmation.<br />
• Instability disorders<br />
– Age 40 years<br />
Table 4. Possible extrinsic causes <strong>of</strong> shoulder pain<br />
Screen for the following:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Cervical spine disorders<br />
Nerve disorders<br />
Nerve root irritation<br />
Nerve compression/entrapment<br />
Brachial plexus injuries<br />
Neuralgic amyotrophy<br />
Inflammatory disorders<br />
Rheumatoid arthritis<br />
Polymyalgia rheumatica<br />
Complex regional pain syndrome<br />
My<strong>of</strong>ascial pain syndrome<br />
Scapulothoracic articulation<br />
Thoracic and rib injuries<br />
Visceral disorders<br />
Table 3. People requiring urgent referral for specialist<br />
evaluation<br />
Red flags (signs or symptoms which alert the clinician<br />
to serious pathology)<br />
Unexplained deformity or swelling<br />
• Consideration <strong>of</strong> surgery as management<br />
option (plain films are best requested by<br />
a specialist where surgery is being considered<br />
as a management option.<br />
Recommended views<br />
• AP glenoid fossa (Grashey View)<br />
• Either outlet or lateral scapular<br />
• Axial.<br />
Indications for diagnostic ultrasound<br />
Refer for diagnostic ultrasound where the clinical<br />
diagnosis is uncertain and it is important to<br />
exclude a significant rotator cuff tear.<br />
6. Refer for specialist referral where appropriate<br />
Appropriate and timely referral for a specialist<br />
evaluation is important where indicated to<br />
achieve optimal outcomes.<br />
Early referral is recommended for the following:<br />
• Two or more traumatic dislocations<br />
• Recurrent posterior/other instabilities<br />
• Where the diagnosis is in doubt.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> specialist groups are competent to<br />
evaluate shoulder problems. <strong>The</strong> decision about to<br />
40 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Significant weakness not due to pain<br />
Suspected malignancy<br />
Significant unexplained sensory/motor deficit<br />
Pulmonary or vascular compromise<br />
Other significant structural damage<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Displaced or unstable fracture<br />
Failed attempt (x2) reduction <strong>of</strong> dislocated shoulder<br />
Massive tear <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff (>5 cm)<br />
Isolated rupture <strong>of</strong> subscapularis or pectoralis major<br />
Severe dislocation GH, AC or SC joints<br />
Undiagnosed severe shoulder pain
whom to refer a patient will vary depending on<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> the shoulder injury, the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> specialist groups and the preferences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient and referring health pr<strong>of</strong>essional.<br />
Discussion<br />
While there is an abundance <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tests<br />
in clinical practice, this guideline indicates that<br />
no one test or combination <strong>of</strong> tests has been<br />
shown to accurately and reliability discriminate<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder disorders. However diagnostic<br />
ultrasound is a modality available to primary<br />
care practitioners and this has been found to be<br />
useful in confirming a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a full thickness<br />
rotator cuff tear, but less useful for partial<br />
thickness rotator cuff tears.<br />
Since the publication <strong>of</strong> the guideline two systematic<br />
reviews relevant to the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> key<br />
shoulder pathologies have been published. <strong>The</strong><br />
first investigated the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> instability and<br />
labral tears, 3 and the second the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> superior<br />
glenoid labral lesions only (SLAP lesions). 4<br />
<strong>The</strong> first review evaluated tests to distinguish<br />
between shoulder instability classified on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> degree (subluxation or dislocation) and<br />
direction (anterior, posterior, inferior or multidirectional)<br />
and labral lesions classified on the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> location and type <strong>of</strong> tear. 3 This review evaluated<br />
four provocation and three laxity tests for<br />
instability <strong>of</strong> the shoulder, and 14 tests for labral<br />
tears. <strong>The</strong> evidence suggests that the relocation<br />
and anterior release tests are best for establishing<br />
the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> instability while the biceps load<br />
I and II test, the pain provocation test <strong>of</strong> Mimori<br />
and the internal rotation resistance strength<br />
tests are best for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a SLAP lesion.<br />
It should be noted that these studies were all<br />
located in specialised care centres and may have<br />
limited applicability to primary care. Limitations<br />
regarding methodology <strong>of</strong> individual studies were<br />
also noted.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second review evaluated nine tests for superior<br />
glenoid labral lesions (SLAP lesions) from<br />
11 studies. 4 <strong>The</strong> authors concluded that physical<br />
examination cannot provide a definitive diagnosis<br />
for SLAP lesions at this stage. Limited reliability<br />
due to the inherent difficulties in performing<br />
these tests and the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> the patient<br />
populations studied contributed to the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
evidence for any one test or combination <strong>of</strong> tests<br />
to accurately diagnose SLAP lesions.<br />
Even with this additional evidence, the evidence<br />
base to diagnosis <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries to the<br />
shoulder is limited. Assessment relies on thorough<br />
history-taking and physician examination,<br />
with appropriate referral where there is evidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> serious damage or the diagnosis remains<br />
unclear.<br />
References<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
1. Accident Compensation Corporation. Injury Statistics. ACC<br />
Injury Statistics 2006. Wellington: ACC; 2006.<br />
2. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guideline Group. Diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and related disorders: Best practice<br />
evidence-based guideline. Wellington: NZGG; 2004. p.86.<br />
3. Luime JJ, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Kuiper JI, Burdorf A,<br />
Verhaar JAN, et al. Does this patient have an instability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shoulder or a labrum lesion? JAMA 2004;292(16):1989–99.<br />
4. Jones GL, Galluch DB. Clinical assessment <strong>of</strong> superior glenoid<br />
labral lesions: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res<br />
2007;455:45–51.<br />
5. Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre LF, Waugh N. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> diagnostic tests for the assessment <strong>of</strong> shoulder pain<br />
due to s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> disorders: a systematic review. Health<br />
Technol Assess 2003;7(29).<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Funded by the Accident<br />
Compensation Corporation<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
COMPETING INTERESTS<br />
None declared<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 41
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
1 Section <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology<br />
& Biostatistics, School <strong>of</strong><br />
Population Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Medical and Health Science,<br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice and Primary Health<br />
Care, School <strong>of</strong> Population<br />
Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />
and Health Science, <strong>The</strong><br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
3 School <strong>of</strong> Rehabilitation and<br />
Occupation Studies, AUT<br />
University, Auckland<br />
J PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
2009;1(1):42–49.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO:<br />
Gillian Robb<br />
Section <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology<br />
& Biostatistics, School<br />
<strong>of</strong> Population Health,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />
Private Bag 92019,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
g.robb@auckland.ac.nz<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> an evidence-based guideline<br />
on s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and related<br />
disorders—Part 2: Management<br />
Gillian Robb MPH (Hons), Dip Physiotherapy, Dip Ergonomics; 1 Bruce Arroll MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP; 2 Duncan<br />
Reid MHSc (Hons), PGD (Manip Physiotherapy), MNZCP; 3 Felicity Goodyear-Smith MBChB, MGP, FRNZCGP 2<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
AIM: To provide a succinct summary <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries to the shoulder for primary<br />
health care practitioners based on the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> guideline.<br />
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed the guideline by critically appraising and grading retrieved<br />
literature using the Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology (GATE); and the Scottish Intercollegiate<br />
Guideline Network. Recommendations were derived from resulting evidence tables.<br />
RESULTS: For the management <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder disorders there is little evidence to support or<br />
refute the efficacy <strong>of</strong> common interventions for shoulder disorders in general and rotator cuff disorders in<br />
particular. For rotator cuff tendinosis and partial tears, use NSAIDs and subacromial corticosteroid injections<br />
with caution and provide a trial <strong>of</strong> supervised exercise. For frozen shoulders, intra-articular corticosteroid<br />
injection should be considered and refer for supervised exercise after acute pain has settled. For<br />
shoulder instability, good evidence supports the referral <strong>of</strong> physically active young adults for orthopaedic<br />
intervention following a first traumatic shoulder dislocation.<br />
CONCLUSION: While there is a dearth <strong>of</strong> good evidence, this guideline does provide a framework for<br />
the management <strong>of</strong> common s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries <strong>of</strong> the shoulder.<br />
KEyWORDS: Shoulder, s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> injuries, primary health care<br />
Introduction<br />
Diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong> shoulder injuries is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the most challenging areas <strong>of</strong> musculoskeletal<br />
medicine. Prevalence figures for shoulder<br />
disorders vary widely for point prevalence<br />
(7–26%), one month prevalence (19–31%), one<br />
year prevalence (5–47%) and lifetime prevalence<br />
(7–66%). 1 Shoulder disorders are therefore relatively<br />
common, but only 50% <strong>of</strong> new episodes <strong>of</strong><br />
shoulder complaints presented in primary care are<br />
completely recovered within six months, increasing<br />
to only 60% at one year. 2<br />
It is likely that suboptimal management contributes<br />
to unfavourable outcomes for patients. This<br />
paper is the second <strong>of</strong> a two-part series which<br />
summarises the evidence for assessment and management<br />
<strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries based on<br />
the evidence-based guideline <strong>The</strong> diagnosis and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries and<br />
related disorders developed in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> (NZ),<br />
led by EPIQ, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland under the<br />
auspices <strong>of</strong> the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines Group<br />
(NZGG). 3 This guideline was commissioned by<br />
ACC in 2003 to reduce identified variation in<br />
both diagnosis and management and to improve<br />
outcomes for claimants.<br />
This guideline was endorsed by the <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practitioners, the<br />
NZ Orthopaedic Association, the NZ Society <strong>of</strong><br />
Physiotherapists Inc., the NZ Association <strong>of</strong> Mus-<br />
42 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
culoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine NZ, and<br />
the <strong>Royal</strong> Australasian and <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Radiologists. <strong>The</strong> full document is available on<br />
the NZGG website (http://www.nzgg.org.nz).<br />
<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to provide a succinct<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong><br />
injuries to the shoulder in a form that is readily<br />
accessible to primary health care practitioners.<br />
Methods<br />
Methods have been described in Part 1. Part 2<br />
<strong>of</strong> this summary addresses the management <strong>of</strong><br />
adults with the following shoulder injuries. Adolescents<br />
were included for shoulder instabilities<br />
given that dislocation and recurrent dislocation<br />
are more common in this age group.<br />
1. Rotator cuff and related disorders (including<br />
impingement, subacromial bursitis, tendinosis,<br />
painful arc syndrome, partial, full thickness<br />
and massive tears <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff, long<br />
head <strong>of</strong> biceps rupture and calcific tendonitis)<br />
2. Frozen shoulder (also known as adhesive<br />
capsulitis)<br />
3. Glenohumeral instabilities (acute and<br />
recurrent dislocation, labral injuries and other<br />
instabilities)<br />
4. Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries<br />
(including stress osteolysis, osteoarthritis and<br />
dislocation)<br />
5. Sternoclavicular (SC) joint injuries (including<br />
sprains, dislocation and arthritis and related<br />
conditions).<br />
This guideline specifically excludes fractures, inflammatory<br />
conditions, degenerative conditions,<br />
endocrinological and neurological conditions.<br />
hemiplegic shoulder and chronic shoulder pain<br />
including occupational overuse disorders.<br />
For each <strong>of</strong> the included conditions evidence for<br />
management was sought based on searches relating<br />
to interventions commonly used in practice.<br />
For each condition a comprehensive literature<br />
search was undertaken in the major electronic<br />
databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, AMED,<br />
SPORTdiscus and Current Contents). Searching<br />
also included the Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Systematic<br />
Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register,<br />
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS<br />
What we already know: In general, the evidence for the management <strong>of</strong><br />
acute s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries is weak and limited.<br />
What this study adds: For rotator cuff tendinosis and partial tears, use<br />
NSAIDs and subacromial corticosteroid injections with caution and provide<br />
a trial <strong>of</strong> supervised exercise. For frozen shoulders, intra-articular corticosteroid<br />
injection should be considered and refer for supervised exercise after<br />
acute pain has settled. For shoulder instability, good evidence supports the<br />
referral <strong>of</strong> physically active young adults for orthopaedic intervention following<br />
a first traumatic shoulder dislocation.<br />
the Database <strong>of</strong> Reviews <strong>of</strong> Effectiveness (DARE)<br />
and relevant Internet sites including PEDro, NHS<br />
clinical trials, Health Technology Assessments for<br />
NHS, Bandolier and National Guideline Clearing<br />
House. Reference lists <strong>of</strong> included studies were<br />
checked for additional studies.<br />
Only published randomised controlled trials,<br />
meta-analyses and systematic reviews in the<br />
English language were considered for inclusion.<br />
Quality was assessed using the Generic Appraisal<br />
Tool for Epidemiology (GATE) available at: http://<br />
www.epiq.co.nz (modified since this guideline<br />
developed).<br />
Evidence from the relevant studies was summarised<br />
into evidence tables. Recommendations<br />
were developed using the SIGN ‘Considered<br />
Judgment’ process. (SIGN Guideline development<br />
process: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/compjudgement.html)<br />
Grading is based on the strength <strong>of</strong> the evidence<br />
and does not indicate the relative importance <strong>of</strong><br />
the recommendations.<br />
Results<br />
Results are presented for each condition according<br />
to the grade <strong>of</strong> recommendation as follows:<br />
• A Recommendation:<br />
Supported by good evidence<br />
• B Recommendation:<br />
Supported by fair evidence<br />
• Good practice point:<br />
Consensus <strong>of</strong> the guideline team.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 43
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
In general, due to lack <strong>of</strong> agreement in defining<br />
shoulder disorders, poor quality <strong>of</strong> studies,<br />
and heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> studies with respect<br />
to participants, interventions, and outcomes,<br />
there is little evidence to support or refute the<br />
efficacy <strong>of</strong> common interventions for shoulder<br />
disorders in general 4,5 and rotator cuff disorders<br />
in particular. 6<br />
1. Rotator cuff and related disorders<br />
Rotator cuff disorders are the most common<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> shoulder problems. <strong>The</strong>y range from<br />
mild strain causing impingement-type symptoms<br />
to massive tears and total absence <strong>of</strong> the cuff<br />
with severe loss <strong>of</strong> function. 7<br />
Tendinosis causing impingement-type symptoms<br />
(painful arc) is due to collagen fatigue resulting<br />
from repetitive overhead activities. 8 In contrast,<br />
rotator cuff tears typically result from trauma<br />
and are more common in people over the age <strong>of</strong><br />
35 years.<br />
Partial thickness tears can occur on the bursal<br />
or articular side <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff and do not<br />
extend through the full thickness <strong>of</strong> the tendon.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are more common than full thickness tears<br />
which extend through the full thickness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tendon and are <strong>of</strong>ten more symptomatic. 9 Full<br />
thickness tears increase with advancing age, frequently<br />
occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> minimal trauma.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se tears are <strong>of</strong>ten asymptomatic and compatible<br />
with normal painless functional activity. 10<br />
Massive tears have been defined as tears >5cm or<br />
tears involving two or more tendons (more <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
supraspinatus and infraspinatus, but also supraspinatus<br />
with subscapularis). 11<br />
Weakness is the primary sign <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> integrity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff, but should be distinguished<br />
from weakness due to pain inhibition. 10<br />
B recommendations<br />
• Prescribe NSAIDS with caution. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
provide short-term symptomatic pain relief<br />
but can have serious consequences. 12<br />
• Use subacromial corticosteroid injection<br />
with caution. It provides short-term<br />
symptomatic relief for people with tendinosis<br />
and partial thickness tears. 13,14<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is insufficient evidence to determine<br />
the benefits or harms <strong>of</strong> subacromial steroid<br />
injection for full thickness rotator cuff tears. 6<br />
Provide a trial <strong>of</strong> supervised exercise<br />
by a recognised treatment provider for<br />
people with rotator cuff disorders. 4<br />
Avoid the use <strong>of</strong> therapeutic ultrasound<br />
(no additional benefit over<br />
and above exercise alone). 4<br />
For calcific tendonitis, there is limited<br />
evidence for the use <strong>of</strong> ultrasound for pain<br />
relief, 15 and weak evidence for the use <strong>of</strong> Extracorporeal<br />
Shock Wave <strong>The</strong>rapy (ESWT). 16-19<br />
44 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Good practice points for<br />
rotator cuff and related disorders<br />
• Simple analgesics provide pain relief with<br />
potential for less serious side effects.<br />
• Subacromial corticosteroid injections may<br />
be appropriate for full thickness tears as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> long-term management where surgery<br />
is not considered as a treatment option.<br />
• If there is no significant improvement<br />
in patients with a full thickness<br />
tear <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff after four to six<br />
weeks <strong>of</strong> non-operative management,<br />
refer to an orthopaedic specialist.<br />
• Early surgical management for a rotator<br />
cuff tears has the most to <strong>of</strong>fer people<br />
with otherwise healthy t<strong>issue</strong> and who<br />
are physiologically young and active.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are a number <strong>of</strong> disorders closely related to<br />
rotator cuff tears which should be considered as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the differential diagnosis.<br />
• Biceps tendinosis is part <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
pathological processes <strong>of</strong> rotator cuff disorders<br />
and should be managed in the same<br />
way as rotator cuff tendinosis. Rupture <strong>of</strong><br />
the biceps tendon is more common with<br />
increasing age. 20 Management is symptomatic<br />
with almost no indication for operative<br />
repair. Where instability (subluxation<br />
or dislocation <strong>of</strong> the biceps tendon) is suspected,<br />
refer to an orthopaedic surgeon.<br />
• Calcific tendonitis usually occurs spontaneously<br />
and is self-limiting. 16 People with
severe pain and dysfunction may require<br />
urgent referral to an orthopaedic specialist.<br />
• Isolated muscle tears,<br />
while rare, occur<br />
most commonly in the subscapularis 21<br />
and pectoralis major. 22 Both require urgent<br />
referral for orthopaedic evaluation.<br />
2. Frozen shoulder<br />
<strong>The</strong> true frozen shoulder is characterised by an<br />
unknown aetiology, spontaneous and gradual<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> pain and global restriction <strong>of</strong> movement.<br />
23,24 <strong>The</strong> clinical presentation is described as<br />
involving three phases. An initial painful phase<br />
lasting two to three months in which pain is<br />
severe and movement severely restricted is<br />
followed by a second phase also lasting two to<br />
three months where pain diminishes and the<br />
predominant feature is stiffness. Resolution<br />
typically occurs over the next six to 12 months in<br />
which there is a gradual gain in range <strong>of</strong> movement<br />
with less discomfort. In contrast with rotator<br />
cuff impingement or tear, a key diagnostic feature<br />
<strong>of</strong> frozen shoulder is stiffness (limitation <strong>of</strong> both<br />
passive and active range), lack <strong>of</strong> discomfort with<br />
resisted movement and no weakness. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
frequently substantial functional limitation with<br />
respect to activities <strong>of</strong> daily living. 25<br />
B recommendations<br />
• In the painful phase actively consider intraarticular<br />
corticosteroid injection performed by<br />
an experienced clinician. 14,26<br />
• After the acute pain has settled <strong>of</strong>fer supervised<br />
exercise by a recognised treatment provider to<br />
improve range <strong>of</strong> movement. 26 Mobilisation<br />
does not <strong>of</strong>fer any additional benefit. 14<br />
• Laser therapy and acupuncture may be beneficial<br />
in the treatment <strong>of</strong> frozen shoulder. 4,27<br />
• Hydrodilation has not been found to be<br />
effective. 5<br />
Good practice points for<br />
frozen shoulder<br />
• Avoid vigorous stretching in the early<br />
phase as this will exacerbate pain.<br />
• It is important that people with a frozen<br />
shoulder understand the time it<br />
takes for this condition to resolve.<br />
3. Glenohumeral instabilities<br />
Instabilities are symptomatic manifestation<br />
<strong>of</strong> pathological movement <strong>of</strong> one joint surface<br />
in relation to another and should be contrasted<br />
with laxity which is the non-pathological<br />
linear displacement <strong>of</strong> one articular surface<br />
in relation to the other. 28 Instabilities include<br />
acute glenohumeral dislocations (anterior, posterior<br />
and inferior), multidirectional instability<br />
(global laxity <strong>of</strong> the shoulder) and tears <strong>of</strong> the<br />
glenoid labrum.<br />
Anterior dislocations are the most common<br />
acute traumatic dislocation. In younger people<br />
these are <strong>of</strong>ten associated with detachment <strong>of</strong><br />
the labrum from the rim (Bankart lesions) with<br />
a 90% chance <strong>of</strong> recurrence in people under 20<br />
years. 29 Dislocations are also common in the<br />
sixth decade <strong>of</strong> life 30 but are more likely to be<br />
associated with capsular tear and concomitant<br />
rotator cuff tears. 31<br />
Labral injuries (including detachment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
superior labrum either anteriorly, superiorly<br />
or both) are common in overhead athletes as<br />
progressive failure <strong>of</strong> the labrum or may occur<br />
as a traumatic event in association with anterior<br />
dislocation. 32 <strong>The</strong>se are <strong>of</strong>ten associated with<br />
vague symptoms <strong>of</strong> impingement associated with<br />
activity, clicking, locking and in some a ‘dead<br />
arm’ which is the sudden sharp paralysing pain<br />
or sense <strong>of</strong> subluxation associated with weakness,<br />
tingling and numbness. 33<br />
A recommendations<br />
• Young adults engaged in demanding<br />
physical activities with a first traumatic<br />
shoulder dislocation should be<br />
referred for orthopaedic evaluation. 34<br />
Good practice points for<br />
glenohumeral instabilities<br />
• Investigations for acute dislocations:<br />
– Pre-reduction x-ray is recommended<br />
for people >40 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
– Post-reduction x-ray is recommended<br />
for all people with a first time<br />
dislocation to confirm the reduction<br />
and assess for bony injury.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 45
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
– X-ray is required for all people with<br />
a failed attempt at reduction.<br />
– X-ray is recommended for those with<br />
recurrent dislocation where surgical stabilisation<br />
may be a management option.<br />
• Acute management <strong>of</strong> dislocations:<br />
– Only clinicians with expertise should<br />
reduce anterior or posterior dislocations.<br />
– Relaxation is critical for successful reduction.<br />
Ensure adequate analgesia is given<br />
as required before attempting reduction.<br />
– Attempt slow steady traction for at least<br />
30 seconds, avoiding excessive force while<br />
attempting to reduce a dislocated shoulder.<br />
– Urgent referral to an orthopaedic specialist<br />
is required when reduction is<br />
unsuccessful after two attempts.<br />
• Post-reduction management <strong>of</strong> dislocations:<br />
– In people with a primary dislocation<br />
for whom non-operative management<br />
is appropriate apply a sling,<br />
provide analgesia and refer for a supervised<br />
exercise programme.<br />
– Following dislocation, people should<br />
not return to sport for at least six<br />
weeks, or when they have achieved<br />
near normal muscle strength.<br />
• Recurrent dislocation:<br />
– People with recurrent dislocation<br />
(>2) should be referred to an orthopaedic<br />
specialist to evaluate the<br />
need for surgical stabilisation.<br />
• Multidirectional instability:<br />
– A comprehensive rehabilitation programme<br />
focusing on strengthening<br />
the scapular stabilisers and rotator<br />
cuff muscle may improve function.<br />
– Where treatment fails to improve<br />
function by six months, surgical intervention<br />
may be considered.<br />
• Labral tears:<br />
– Labral injuries should be referred to an<br />
orthopaedic surgeon for evaluation.<br />
4. Acromioclavicular joint injuries<br />
Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are common<br />
in men between the second and fourth decade <strong>of</strong><br />
life, frequently occurring during sport from a fall<br />
on the point <strong>of</strong> the shoulder. 35 AC joint injuries<br />
are classified as Grade I (intact joint), Grade II (up<br />
to 50% vertical subluxation <strong>of</strong> the clavicle with<br />
rupture <strong>of</strong> the AC ligament) and Grade III (more<br />
than 50% vertical subluxation <strong>of</strong> the clavicle and<br />
complete rupture <strong>of</strong> both the AC and coracoclavicular<br />
ligaments). 35,36<br />
Good practice points for<br />
acromioclavicular joint injuries<br />
• People with Grade I and II sprains can be<br />
provided with a sling and analgesics for<br />
five to seven days until comfortable.<br />
• <strong>The</strong>re is a lack <strong>of</strong> evidence to support<br />
any particular method <strong>of</strong> taping.<br />
• Advise gradual return to activity as<br />
symptoms settle, avoiding heavy lifting<br />
and contact sports for eight to 12 weeks.<br />
• People with Grade III AC joint sprains<br />
can be managed non-operatively, but<br />
if this is not successful after three<br />
months, consider referral to a specialist<br />
for further evaluation.<br />
• More serious AC joint dislocations require<br />
referral for orthopaedic evaluation.<br />
5. Sternoclavicular joint injuries<br />
<strong>The</strong> most common sternoclavicular (SC) disorders<br />
are strains sustained from motor vehicle and<br />
sporting injuries. 37,38 In mild strains, the ligaments<br />
are intact and the joint stable. In moderate<br />
strains, the ligaments may be partially disrupted<br />
and the joint is subluxed. Severe strains (dislocations)<br />
are rare, the most common being anterior<br />
dislocations. Posterior dislocations, however,<br />
while uncommon, may compromise major vessels,<br />
the trachea and oesophagus which are in close<br />
proximity. 39,40<br />
Local tenderness and swelling characterise milder<br />
strains, whereas a palpable gap may be present in<br />
more serious injuries. CT may be the best radiological<br />
technique for SC joints.<br />
46 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Good practice points for<br />
sternoclavicular joint injuries<br />
• Although rare, clinicians should watch<br />
for pulmonary or vascular compromise<br />
due to a posterior dislocation <strong>of</strong> the SC<br />
joint usually resulting from severe compression<br />
trauma. Immediate referral to<br />
an appropriate specialist is required.<br />
• Most injures <strong>of</strong> the SC joint are mild<br />
and can be managed with a sling, analgesics<br />
and return to activity as tolerated.<br />
Discussion<br />
In general, the evidence for the management <strong>of</strong><br />
acute s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries is weak and<br />
limited. Little has been added in the years since<br />
publication <strong>of</strong> the guideline.<br />
A brief search for guidelines, systematic reviews<br />
or meta-analyses published since the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the NZ guideline 3 revealed an additional three<br />
Cochrane reviews 41-43 and a number <strong>of</strong> reviews<br />
published in other journals. 44,45,46-53<br />
<strong>The</strong> first <strong>of</strong> the three Cochrane reviews found<br />
little evidence to support or refute the use <strong>of</strong><br />
acupuncture for shoulder pain in general, but<br />
suggested there may be short-term benefit with<br />
respect to pain and function. 41<br />
<strong>The</strong> second Cochrane review was suggestive that<br />
oral steroids confer a worthwhile short-term<br />
(six weeks) benefit for pain, range <strong>of</strong> movement<br />
and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.<br />
42 <strong>The</strong> stage at which this was most effective<br />
was not specified, but the median duration <strong>of</strong><br />
symptoms <strong>of</strong> participants in the included studies<br />
was six months. While adverse effects reported<br />
were minor, the potential risk <strong>of</strong> oral steroids<br />
should be considered when making treatment<br />
decisions. 42<br />
<strong>The</strong> third Cochrane review reported a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
evidence to inform choices for conservative<br />
management following closed reduction <strong>of</strong> traumatic<br />
anterior dislocation <strong>of</strong> the shoulder. 43<br />
This review was based on one small, preliminary,<br />
poor quality study which was also included in<br />
the shoulder guideline. 54 While the review reported<br />
no significant differences between groups<br />
for any outcome, the study did claim that<br />
fixation in external rotation was effective in<br />
reducing redislocation at 15-months’ follow-up<br />
(p=0.008). Given that this was a small, poor quality<br />
study, the conclusions <strong>of</strong> the review<br />
are relevant.<br />
Of the additional reviews located, seven related<br />
to disorders <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff, 44, 45,46-49,53 one<br />
related to adhesive capsulitis, 50 one focused on<br />
instability, 51 and one reviewed the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> Grade III acromioclavicular injuries. 52 For<br />
disorders <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff, the findings <strong>of</strong><br />
these reviews are consistent with the guideline<br />
and no new evidence was reported for treatment<br />
options. One review, however, investigated factors<br />
influencing the decisions to surgically repair<br />
symptomatic full thickness rotator cuff tears,<br />
including demographic variables (age and gender),<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> symptoms, non-operative treatment,<br />
timing <strong>of</strong> surgery, physical examination findings,<br />
In general, the evidence for the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> acute s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder injuries is weak<br />
and limited<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the tear and pending workers compensation<br />
claims. While there was no randomised trial<br />
evidence for any one factor, they suggested that<br />
older chronological age should not be considered<br />
a barrier to operative repair as studies have reported<br />
good outcomes for older patients and that<br />
pending workers’ compensation claims did not<br />
appear to influence treatment results. 53<br />
A systematic review <strong>of</strong> randomised trials using<br />
multiple corticosteroid injections for adhesive<br />
capsulitis evaluated nine trials, <strong>of</strong> which four<br />
were considered to be <strong>of</strong> high methodological<br />
quality. This review found a benefit for up<br />
to three corticosteroid injections and limited<br />
evidence that six injections were beneficial. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
was no evidence that more than six injections<br />
were <strong>of</strong> benefit. It should be noted that while five<br />
different corticosteroids were used, all were given<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 47
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
intra-articularly. Also, only two <strong>of</strong> these studies<br />
were based in general practice. 50<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation for<br />
non-operative management <strong>of</strong> shoulder instability<br />
found only weak evidence to support immobilisation<br />
for three to four weeks followed by a<br />
structured rehabilitation programme for people<br />
with a primary dislocation. 51 Instability in this<br />
review was defined as symptomatic hypermobility<br />
(single plane or multidirectional) resulting<br />
from traumatic and atraumatic subluxation or<br />
dislocation.<br />
For Grade III acromioclavicular injuries, nonoperative<br />
treatment is the preferred option based<br />
on three randomised trials included in a review<br />
which concluded that while surgical results were<br />
‘no better’ they were associated with more complications,<br />
increased convalescence and time away<br />
from work. 52<br />
Conclusion<br />
As with diagnosis <strong>of</strong> shoulder injuries, the<br />
evidence for management <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder<br />
injuries is limited and largely determined by the<br />
collective experience and expertise <strong>of</strong> practitioners<br />
in the field.<br />
References<br />
1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendrikson LJM, Burdorf A, Verhagen<br />
AP, Miedema HS, et al. Prevalence and incidence <strong>of</strong> shoulder<br />
pain in the general population: A systematic review. Scand J<br />
Rheumatol 2004;33:73–81.<br />
2. Kuijpers T, Van der Windt DA, Van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM.<br />
Systematic review <strong>of</strong> prognostic cohort studies on shoulder<br />
disorders. Pain 2004;109:420–431.<br />
3. Accident Compensation Corporation, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines<br />
Group. <strong>The</strong> diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t t<strong>issue</strong> shoulder<br />
injuries and related disorders. Wellington: ACC; 2004.<br />
4. Green A. Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(3).<br />
5. Green S, Buchbinder R, Glazier R, Forbes A. Interventions for<br />
shoulder pain (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst<br />
Rev 2003(2).<br />
6. Ejnisman B, Carrera EF, Fallopa F, Peccin MS, Cohen M.<br />
Interventions for tears <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff in adults. Cochrane<br />
Library 2004(Issue 1).<br />
7. Sher JS. Anatomy, biomechanics and pathophysiology <strong>of</strong> rotator<br />
cuff disease. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;<br />
1999.<br />
8. Khan KM, Cook JL, Taunton JE, Bonar F. Overuse tendinsosis:<br />
not tendinitis. Part 1: A new paragidm for a difficult clinical<br />
problem. Physician Sports Med 2000;28(5):31–46.<br />
9. Fukuda H. <strong>The</strong> management <strong>of</strong> partial-thickness tears <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg—Series B 2003;85(1):3–11.<br />
10. Matsen FA, Arntz CT, Lippitt S. Rotator Cuff. 2nd ed. WB<br />
Saunders Co.; 1998.<br />
11. Gerber C. Massive rotator cuff tears. Philadelphia: Lippincott<br />
Williams and Wilkins; 1999.<br />
12. Van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder<br />
disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics<br />
and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:959–964.<br />
13. Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F. Corticosteroid injections for<br />
painful shoulder:a meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005;<br />
55:224–228.<br />
14. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM. Corticosteroid injections<br />
for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev<br />
2003(1):CD004016.<br />
15. Ebenbichler GR, Erdogmus CB, Resch KL, Funovics MA,<br />
Kainberger F, Barisani G, et al. Ultrasound therapy for<br />
calcific tendinitis <strong>of</strong> the shoulder.[comment]. N Engl J Med<br />
1999;340(20):1533–8.<br />
16. Gerdesmeyer L, Wagenpfeil S, Haake M, Maier M, Loew M,<br />
Wortler K, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> chronic calcifying tendonitis <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff: A<br />
randomised controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290(19):2573–2580.<br />
17. Pan P, Chou CL, Chiou HJ, Ma HL, Lee HC, Chan RC. Extracorporeal<br />
shock wave therapy for chronic calcific tendinitis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shoulders: a functional and sonographic study. Arch Phys Med<br />
Rehabil 2003;84:988–993.<br />
18. Cosentino R, De Stefano R, Selvi E, Frati E, manca S, Frediani<br />
B, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic calcific<br />
tedninitis <strong>of</strong> the shoulder: single blind study. Ann Rheum Dis<br />
2003;62(3):248–250.<br />
19. Loew M, Daecke W, Kusnierczak D, Rahmanzadeh M,<br />
Ewerbeck V. Shock-wave therapy is effective for chronic<br />
calcifying tendinitis <strong>of</strong> the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg—Br<br />
1999;81(5):863–7.<br />
20. Yamaguchi K, Bindra R. Disorders <strong>of</strong> the biceps tendon. Philadelphia:<br />
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999.<br />
21. Warner JJ, Answorth AA. Diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong><br />
subscpularis tendon tears. Tech Orthop 1994;9:116–125.<br />
22. Dodds SD, Wolfe SW. Injuries to the pectoralis major. Sports<br />
Medicine 2002;32(14):945–52.<br />
23. Harryman DT, Lazarus JM, Rozencwaig R. <strong>The</strong> stiff shoulder.<br />
Second Edition ed: WB Saunders Co.; 1998.<br />
24. Rizk TE, Christopher RP, Pinals RS, et al. Adhesive capsulitis<br />
(frozen shoulder): A new approach to its management. Arch<br />
Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64(1):29–33.<br />
25. Neviaser RJ. Radiologic assessment <strong>of</strong> the shoulder. Plain and<br />
arthrographic. Orthop Clin <strong>of</strong> North Am 1987;18(3):343–349.<br />
26. Carette S, M<strong>of</strong>fet H, Tardif J, Bessette L, Morin F, Fremont P, et<br />
al. Intraarticular corticosteroids, supervised physiotherapy, or<br />
a combination <strong>of</strong> the two in the treatment <strong>of</strong> adhesive capsulitis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the shoulder: A placebo-controlled trial. 01 MAR 2003<br />
Arthritis Rheum 2003;48(3):829–838.<br />
27. Sun KO, Chan KC, Lo SL, Fong DY. Acupuncture for frozen<br />
shoulder. Hong Kong Med J 2001;7(4):381–91.<br />
28. Cole BJ, Warner JJ. Anatomy, Biomechanics, and pathophysiology<br />
<strong>of</strong> glenohumeral instabiltiy. Philadelphia: Lippincott<br />
Williams & Wilkins; 1999.<br />
29. Matsen FA, Thomas SC, Rockwood CA, Wirth CJ. Glenohumeral<br />
instability. WB Saunders Co.; 1998.<br />
30. Hayes K, Callanan M, Walton J, Paxinos A, Murrell GAC.<br />
Shoulder instability: Management and rehabilitation. J Orthop<br />
Sports Phys <strong>The</strong>r 2002;32(10):497–509.<br />
31. Liu SH, Mark H. Anterior shoulder instability: Current Review.<br />
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 1996;323:327–337.<br />
32. Parentis MA, Mohr KJ, ElAttrache NS. Disorders <strong>of</strong> the<br />
superior labrum: review and treatment guidelines. Clin Orthop<br />
Relat Res 2002(400):77–87.<br />
33. Rowe CR. Recurrent transient anterior subluxation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;223:11–19.<br />
48 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
34. Handoll HHG, Almaiyah MA, Rangan A. Surgical versus<br />
non-surgical treatment for acute anterior shoulder dislocation.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(Issue 1).<br />
35. Rockwood CA, Williams GR, Young DC. Disorders <strong>of</strong> the<br />
acromioclavicular joint. WB Saunders Co.; 1998.<br />
36. Bossart PJ, Jouce SM, Manaster BJ, Packer SM. Lack <strong>of</strong> efficacy<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘weighted’ radiographs in diagnosing acute acromioclavicular<br />
separation. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17(1):20–24.<br />
37. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Disorders <strong>of</strong> the sternoclavicular<br />
joint:Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Philadelphia:<br />
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999.<br />
38. Yeh GL, Williams GR, Jr. Conservative management <strong>of</strong> sternoclavicular<br />
injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 2000;31(2):189–203.<br />
39. Rockwood CA, WIrth MA. Disorders <strong>of</strong> the sternoclavicular<br />
joint. 2nd ed. WB Saunders Co.; 1999.<br />
40. Szalay EA, Rockwood CA, Jr. Injuries <strong>of</strong> the shoulder and arm.<br />
Emerg Med Clinics North Am 1984;2(2):279–94.<br />
41. Green S, Buchbinder R, Hetrick S. Acupuncture for shoulder<br />
pain. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Syst Rev 2005; Issue 2.<br />
42. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM, Johnstone RV. Oral steroids<br />
for adhesive capsulitis Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;<br />
Issue 4.<br />
43. Handoll HHG, Hanchard NCA, Goodchild L, Feary J. Conservative<br />
management following closed reduction <strong>of</strong> traumatic<br />
dislocation <strong>of</strong> the shoulder Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;<br />
Issue 1.<br />
44. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.<br />
A systematic review. J Hand <strong>The</strong>r 2004;17:152–164.<br />
45. Faber KJ, Kuiper JI, Burdorf A, Miedema HS, Verhaar J. Treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> impingement syndrome: a systematic review on the<br />
effects on functional limitations and return to work. J Occup<br />
Rehab 2006;16:7–25.<br />
46. Grant HJ, Arthur A, Pichora DR. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> interventions<br />
for rotator cuff pathology. A systematic review. J Hand <strong>The</strong>r<br />
2004;17:274–299.<br />
47. Koester MC, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Spindler KP. <strong>The</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment <strong>of</strong> rotator<br />
cuff disease. A systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg<br />
2007;15:3–11.<br />
48. Ainsworth R, Lewis JS. Exercise therapy <strong>of</strong> the conservative<br />
management <strong>of</strong> full thickness tears <strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff. A<br />
systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2007;41:200–210.<br />
49. Harniman E, Carette S, Kennedy C, Beaton DE. Extracorporeal<br />
shock wave therapy for calcific and noncalcific tendonitis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rotator cuff. A systematic review. J Hand <strong>The</strong>r<br />
2004;17:132–151.<br />
50. Shah N, Lewis M. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: systematic<br />
review <strong>of</strong> randomised trials using multiple corticosteroid<br />
injections. British Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practice 2007(August):662–667.<br />
51. Gibson K, Growse A, Korda L, Wray E, MacDermid JC. <strong>The</strong><br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation for nonoperative management<br />
<strong>of</strong> shoulder instability. J Hand <strong>The</strong>r 2004;17:229–242.<br />
52. Spencer EE. Treatment <strong>of</strong> Grade III acromiclavicular<br />
joint injuries. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research<br />
2006;455:38–44.<br />
53. Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, Levy BA, Marx RG. Indications for<br />
rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;455:52–63.<br />
54. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Kido T. A new method <strong>of</strong> immobilization<br />
after traumatic anterior dislocation <strong>of</strong> the shoulder: a preliminary<br />
study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12(5):413–415.<br />
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS<br />
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Funded by the Accident<br />
Compensation Corporation<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
COMPETING INTERESTS<br />
None declared.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 49
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
1 Harbour Health Primary<br />
Health Organisation,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
2 HealthWEST Primary Health<br />
Organisation, Auckland,<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
CORRESPONDENCE TO:<br />
Angela Verhoeven<br />
PO Box 104 098,<br />
Lincoln North, Auckland<br />
0654, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
Angela@healthwest.co.nz<br />
A patient-centred referral pathway for mild<br />
to moderate lifestyle and mental health<br />
problems: Does this model work in practice?<br />
Jill Calveley MBChB; 1 Angela Verhoeven PGDipHSc; 2 David Hopcr<strong>of</strong>t MBChB, FRNZCGP, PhD 1<br />
Harbour Health and HealthWEST Primary Health Organisations in collaboration with the University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
BACkgROUND AND CONTExT: <strong>The</strong> Primary Lifestyle Options Programme was an innovative eightmonth,<br />
patient-centred, early primary care–based pilot aimed at identifying and promptly enabling<br />
people with mild to moderate mental health and lifestyle problems to access a range <strong>of</strong> free interventions<br />
as soon as possible.<br />
PROBLEMS: Mild to moderate mental health and lifestyle <strong>issue</strong>s are easily overlooked in primary care. Patients<br />
with these problems, once identified, <strong>of</strong>ten need support to choose and access treatment providers.<br />
STRATEgiES fOR iMPROVEMENT: During a GP visit a patient requests help by completing a CHAT<br />
(Case-finding and Help Assessment Tool) which assesses depression, anxiety, abuse, anger, exercise<br />
level, insomnia, and addictions (gambling, tobacco, alcohol and other substances). Patients subsequently<br />
have a 30-minute GP consultation where a range <strong>of</strong> services to address identified problem(s) is <strong>of</strong>fered;<br />
this choice is assisted by a comprehensive resource manual. A programme coordinator facilitates access<br />
to services by making appointments and liaising between patients and providers. A follow-up GP consult<br />
is available.<br />
RESULTS: 456 patients (6% Maori) aged from 15 to 84 years requested help via the CHAT for one to<br />
seven <strong>issue</strong>s per patient, over an eight-month period. Anxiety, depression and insomnia were the commonest<br />
reasons for requesting help. A feedback questionnaire focussed on the usefulness and practicality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pathway, showing widespread approval from patients, GPs and other treatment providers.<br />
CONCLUSiONS: This programme enables a patient to identify and request help for mental health and<br />
lifestyle problems at a mild–moderate stage, and to be supported through an intervention pathway that<br />
otherwise is unlikely to be available in a busy primary care environment.<br />
kEywORDS: Primary care, patient-centred, mental health<br />
Background<br />
Mild to moderate mental health and lifestyle<br />
problems are ubiquitous and pervasive 1 and can be<br />
overlooked not only by patients and their families<br />
but also by their primary caregivers. While GPs<br />
are well placed to identify such problems,<br />
historically they have been thwarted in doing so<br />
by time constraints 2 and referral uncertainties.<br />
Furthermore, mild or sub-threshold mental<br />
disorders can be diagnostically challenging,<br />
especially in the absence <strong>of</strong> concomitant disability.<br />
3 Mental health screening in primary care has<br />
been widely advocated to address these concerns.<br />
However, reliable means <strong>of</strong> doing so have been<br />
less forthcoming and concerns have been raised<br />
about the efficacy <strong>of</strong> routine screening and the<br />
degree to which a single screening tool can be a<br />
diagnostic ‘gold standard’. 4 In this regard the<br />
50 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
CHAT (Case-finding and Health Assessment<br />
Tool), a short, self-administered screening<br />
questionnaire, has been developed and trialled in<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> to expedite screening <strong>of</strong> adults for<br />
lifestyle and mental health problems in the GP<br />
setting. 5 <strong>The</strong> largest trial was in Auckland,<br />
demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity for<br />
depression, anxiety and stress, abuse, anger<br />
problems, and tobacco, alcohol and other drug<br />
misuse, but had lower levels for exercise and<br />
eating disorders. <strong>The</strong> tool also assesses whether<br />
patients want help with these <strong>issue</strong>s, which<br />
reduces the chance <strong>of</strong> false positives. 6<br />
Having detected a lifestyle/mental health <strong>issue</strong>,<br />
what does the GP then do? Case-finding is one<br />
thing; prompt and appropriate intervention can be<br />
quite another. Traditional referral pathways are to<br />
hospital outpatient clinics (depression, anxiety,<br />
eating disorders), community clinics (for example<br />
community alcohol and drugs clinic or CADs),<br />
and private specialists (psychiatrists, psychologists).<br />
Often however, and especially in public<br />
mental health services, only those patients with<br />
significant acute illness will be seen. Private<br />
clinics are expensive, especially for multiple visits.<br />
Thus, people with mild to moderate lifestyle and/<br />
or mental health disorders are <strong>of</strong>ten left untreated,<br />
adversely affecting their well-being. 7<br />
<strong>The</strong> Primary Lifestyle Options programme was<br />
initiated to enable people with mild to moderate<br />
mental health and lifestyle problems to be<br />
reliably identified and then to have access to<br />
appropriate services as soon as possible. A sense<br />
<strong>of</strong> engagement in a programme increases patients’<br />
likelihood that they will attend. 8 Telephone<br />
prompting can also improve attendance rates. 9<br />
<strong>The</strong> pathway described in this paper is patientcentric—the<br />
patient identifies a problem and<br />
participates in the selection <strong>of</strong> interventions appropriate<br />
to the treatment <strong>of</strong> that problem. This<br />
evaluation focused on the utility <strong>of</strong> the model<br />
in primary care—is it practicable, does it fit in<br />
with general practice workflow, and does it meet<br />
patient requirements for choice and timeframes?<br />
Is it a viable model for people providing the<br />
interventions (those who the GP refers the patient<br />
on to)? Essentially, is the Primary Lifestyle<br />
Options programme a feasible, sensible workable<br />
model <strong>of</strong> care?<br />
wHAT gAP THiS fiLLS<br />
What is already known: <strong>The</strong> current public mental health system focuses<br />
more on patients with significant illness. Those with mild–moderate mental<br />
health and lifestyle <strong>issue</strong>s are <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked in primary care, and have<br />
a limited choice <strong>of</strong> interventions and/or support. <strong>The</strong> CHAT (Case-finding<br />
and Health Assessment Tool) has been validated as a reliable screening tool<br />
for many <strong>of</strong> these <strong>issue</strong>s. A sense <strong>of</strong> engagement in a programme increases<br />
patients’ likelihood that they will attend, and telephone prompting can also<br />
improve attendance rates.<br />
What this study adds: <strong>The</strong> Primary Lifestyle Options programme provides<br />
a patient-centric prompt intervention pathway—the patient identifies<br />
and requests help for a problem and participates in the selection <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
options. Feedback from patients, GPs and other treatment providers indicate<br />
that this is a practicable, timely, and useful model in primary care.<br />
Purpose<br />
To identify those people with mild to moderate<br />
mental health and lifestyle problems attending<br />
their GP and to follow this with prompt access to<br />
appropriate services, within available resources.<br />
Model<br />
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
Patients who were school leavers and older<br />
were asked by their GPs to complete a CHAT<br />
Lifestyle Assessment Tool. This was slightly<br />
modified from the original CHAT by replacing<br />
Eating Disorders with Insomnia, a known<br />
risk factor for, and consequence <strong>of</strong>, depression.<br />
10 Selection <strong>of</strong> these patients was at the<br />
discretion <strong>of</strong> the GP. <strong>The</strong> patient discussed the<br />
completed CHAT with the GP. Those patients<br />
who answered ‘Yes’ to the question ‘Do you<br />
want help with this?’ were asked whether they<br />
would like to make a 30-minute appointment to<br />
see the GP, to discuss intervention options for<br />
the mental health/lifestyle problem revealed by<br />
the CHAT assessment. GPs were assisted in this<br />
by a comprehensive Resource Manual. Intervention,<br />
either internal or external (see below) was<br />
started within one month <strong>of</strong> referral and completed<br />
within three months. A programme coordinator<br />
based at Harbour Health PHO assisted<br />
at various stages in this process by (1) providing<br />
information and support to patients, GPs,<br />
practices and service providers; (2) facilitating<br />
patient access to services, and (3) following up<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 51
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
Figure 1. Primary Lifestyle Options referral pathways<br />
PN = Practice nurse; FU = Follow-up; DNA = Did not attend<br />
Table 1. External treatment provider examples<br />
Provider examples only<br />
(full list given to GPs in Resource Manual)<br />
Exercise Green Prescription Waitakere or North Shore;<br />
10 weeks’ local gym<br />
Smoking Smokefree Harbour Health; Quitline; Asian Smokefree<br />
Alcohol/<br />
illicit drugs<br />
Individual sessions with psychologist/psychotherapist/counsellor;<br />
Community, Alcohol and Drugs Service (CADS); Alcoholics<br />
Anonymous (AA); <strong>The</strong> Alcohol and Drug Helpline etc.<br />
gambling Individual sessions with psychologist/psychotherapist/counsellor;<br />
Problem Gambling Foundation hotline or Internet<br />
Depression/<br />
anxiety<br />
Violence, abuse,<br />
anger<br />
Individual sessions with psychologist/psychotherapist/counsellor;<br />
Essentially Men Weekend Course; Youthlink Family Programme;<br />
Life Line; Youth Line; Phobic Trust and many other family and<br />
community service organisations<br />
Individual sessions with psychologist/psychotherapist/counsellor;<br />
Victim Support; Man Alive; North Harbour Living Without<br />
Violence; North Shore Women’s Centre<br />
insomnia Refer for CBT—four sessions, or five if extra GP consult used<br />
those patients who did not attend these services.<br />
Those patients requiring or already receiving<br />
secondary care–level mental health interventions<br />
were not eligible. <strong>The</strong> overall pathway is summarised<br />
in Figure 1.<br />
Intervention referral options<br />
(1) Internal<br />
Patients with lifestyle/mental health conditions<br />
could be seen by a GP for up to four consults (in<br />
addition to the first 30-minute and 15-minute<br />
follow-up consults) for problem-solving or behavioural<br />
change management.<br />
(2) External (Table 1)<br />
Approximately 150 different providers were<br />
available for selection, including individual,<br />
group, community and support services specifically<br />
for Maori, Pacific Island, and Asian patients.<br />
This new model therefore introduced four processes<br />
to primary care:<br />
1. Patient identification <strong>of</strong> problem area(s)<br />
and request for ‘help’ using the CHAT<br />
questionnaire.<br />
2. A 30-minute extended GP consultation.<br />
3. A PHO-based Programme Coordinator.<br />
4. A 15-minute GP follow-up appointment after<br />
the intervention stage.<br />
All services were free for patients. <strong>The</strong> pilot,<br />
a joint initiative between Harbour Health and<br />
HealthWEST Primary Health Organisations<br />
(PHOs), was funded by the Waitemata District<br />
Health Board (DHB) and was approved by their<br />
Ethics Committee.<br />
Results<br />
Utilisation<br />
Sixty-nine GPs participated in the pilot, each<br />
enrolling from one to 35 patients. Between 15<br />
October 2007 and 30 June 2008 a total <strong>of</strong> 456 patients<br />
were referred for one <strong>of</strong> the interventions.<br />
Of these:<br />
52 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
• 357 patients (78%) were referred<br />
to external providers.<br />
• 99 patients (22%) were referred internally<br />
(i.e. GP or practice nurse); 20 <strong>of</strong> these<br />
were for smoking cessation and eight for<br />
Green Prescription/exercise counselling.<br />
• 91 (20%) completed the full course <strong>of</strong> interventions<br />
and the ‘exit consult’ with<br />
their GP. Approximately 40 had not attended<br />
their final ‘exit’ consult with their<br />
GP despite completing their interventions,<br />
by the time this report was prepared.<br />
• 60 (13%) patients had not attended<br />
any intervention session by the<br />
time this report was prepared.<br />
People requested help in all 10 problem areas on<br />
CHAT (only one for gambling, but there have<br />
been several more requests for help with this<br />
since 30 June 2008). <strong>The</strong> commonest amongst<br />
the 839 listed reasons for referral were depression<br />
(37%) and anxiety (26%). Sixty-seven percent <strong>of</strong><br />
referred patients had depression as at least one <strong>of</strong><br />
their referral reasons, and 35% had anxiety as at<br />
least one <strong>of</strong> their reasons (Figure 2). Fifty-seven<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> patients had two or more reasons for<br />
referral; the commonest (35%) coexisting conditions<br />
were anxiety–depression.<br />
Table 2. Enrolled patient demographics<br />
N %<br />
Gender female 292 64<br />
Male 164 46<br />
Ethnicity Asian 8 1.8<br />
Maori 26 5.7<br />
NZ European 379 83.1<br />
Pacific 5 1.1<br />
Other 38 8.3<br />
Age in years 15–24 72 15.8<br />
25–34 117 25.7<br />
35–44 116 25.4<br />
45–54 74 16.2<br />
55–64 52 11.4<br />
65–74 14 3.1<br />
75–84 11 2.4<br />
Figure 2. Reasons for referral; N=839<br />
Figure 3. Patient rating <strong>of</strong> CHAT Lifestyle Assessment Form; N=48*<br />
* Two people could not recall; two did not answer.<br />
Where people indicated a range e.g. ‘7–8’, the lower <strong>of</strong> the two was recorded<br />
Patient feedback<br />
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
Fifty-two <strong>of</strong> the 91 patients who had completed<br />
the PLO programme gave feedback via a confidential<br />
written questionnaire.<br />
• Most patients rated the CHAT assessment form<br />
as being ‘helpful or very helpful’ (Figure 3).<br />
• 89% felt that the initial 30-minute consult<br />
with their GP was enough time to discuss<br />
options for getting help.<br />
• 87% rated the assistance to get appointments<br />
with external providers as being ‘helpful or<br />
very helpful’.<br />
• Most patients (82%) referred to external<br />
providers were seen within two weeks, and<br />
91% felt that the waiting time to be seen was<br />
acceptable.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 53
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
Patient comments about use <strong>of</strong> the CHAT tool<br />
mainly related to it being simple to use and helpful<br />
in identifying problems:<br />
‘Helped me to positively identify the areas where<br />
I was not coping and required focus.’<br />
‘Simple questions—all part <strong>of</strong> the realisation<br />
process that there was something wrong. It was<br />
good to not have too long with the form to think<br />
too deeply, better to just answer straight away.’<br />
‘<strong>General</strong> questions were asked, nothing too over<br />
the top. It was helpful because it was on paper,<br />
sometimes it’s easier to write things down.’<br />
‘Helpful in the way that it asked you a short, to<br />
the point relevant question for you to respond<br />
with a simple YES/NO answer.’<br />
‘It covered a broad range <strong>of</strong> questions. It was<br />
quick and easy to fill out.’<br />
‘Helped to specify problems, to identify stressors—made<br />
me think about it.’<br />
Some patients remarked that the CHAT form<br />
should be made more available:<br />
‘I felt a little under pressure at the doctor’s because<br />
<strong>of</strong> how I was feeling; maybe if I had taken<br />
the form home to consider it would have been<br />
more comfortable.’<br />
‘Having forms in the waiting room would have<br />
been good.’<br />
‘An idea might be [to put] these forms on display<br />
to increase awareness.’<br />
Patient comments regarding the programme<br />
coordinator’s role were all favourable and related<br />
to proximity and timing <strong>of</strong> referrals:<br />
‘Being new to Auckland, every assistance<br />
was given in finding an appointment close to<br />
where I lived.’<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> whole process was very quick and easy—<br />
superb that help could come close to home. All<br />
organised well.’<br />
‘I didn’t have to do anything. If it was left up to<br />
me I wouldn’t organise anything.’<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> extra time spent and care shown made me<br />
feel that somebody cared about me when I was<br />
very depressed.’<br />
Many patients made very favourable, <strong>of</strong>ten quite<br />
heartfelt remarks about their involvement in this<br />
programme.<br />
‘I hope the programme keeps running—I don’t<br />
know what I would have done if something like<br />
this wasn’t available.’<br />
‘This programme made a huge difference to me<br />
and my family. I felt throughout that I was being<br />
looked after (from my doctor onwards) and the<br />
results were awesome…Huge thumbs up for the<br />
programme from me!’<br />
‘I am very grateful that it exists and that it was<br />
available to me. It made me feel that financial<br />
hardship was dealt with in a sensitive way that<br />
recognised the need for treatment despite this<br />
barrier.’<br />
GP feedback<br />
Thirty-seven <strong>of</strong> the 69 GPs who enrolled their<br />
patients in the PLO programme gave feedback via<br />
a confidential online questionnaire.<br />
• 90% felt that the steps in the programme<br />
were clearly described, and 81%<br />
felt they were easy to implement.<br />
• 76% felt that the programme’s Resource Manual<br />
was ‘useful’ or ‘very useful’ and a further<br />
21% indicated that ‘some parts were useful’.<br />
• 71% introduced the CHAT form to their<br />
patients during the course <strong>of</strong> a consult; the<br />
remainder indicated that their practice nurse<br />
introduced this to a proportion <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />
Practice receptionists were not involved.<br />
• 70% (<strong>of</strong> the foregoing 71%) gave the CHAT<br />
to those patients they thought would<br />
benefit, i.e. opportunistically. However,<br />
a further 22% selected patients specifically<br />
and invited their participation. No GP<br />
gave the form to every waiting patient.<br />
• 57% felt that the initial 30-minute PLO<br />
54 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
consult was ‘easily’ long enough, and a further<br />
41% felt that it was ‘just’ long enough.<br />
80% felt that the referral process to outside<br />
providers ‘went smoothly’.<br />
36% felt that the final 15-minute follow-up<br />
consult was ‘plenty’ and 55%<br />
felt it was ‘just’ long enough.<br />
Most felt that the role <strong>of</strong> the programme<br />
coordinator was helpful, with<br />
39% regarding this as ‘essential’.<br />
<strong>The</strong> invoicing/payment system relating to<br />
the PLO programme was generally regarded<br />
satisfactorily by GPs, with 79% rating this as<br />
3 or more out <strong>of</strong> 5 (where 5 was ‘very easy’).<br />
94% <strong>of</strong> GPs felt that this programme<br />
enabled their patients to access appropriate<br />
interventions, and 85% felt that<br />
this was within suitable timeframes.<br />
95% indicated that they would continue<br />
their involvement with this programme,<br />
and 74% would increase their<br />
involvement if funding permitted.<br />
GP criticisms related to too much paperwork/<br />
too many forms/needs to be electronic (x3), slow<br />
feedback from external providers (x2), and the<br />
funding period not being long enough (x2).<br />
Provider feedback<br />
Forty-four <strong>of</strong> the 49 external providers who had<br />
patients referred to them through the PLO programme<br />
gave feedback via a confidential online<br />
questionnaire.<br />
• All respondents indicated that the referrals<br />
made by GPs were ‘<strong>entire</strong>ly’ (84%)<br />
or ‘mostly’ (16%) appropriate to the particular<br />
service they provided, and most<br />
felt that the referring information was<br />
always (34%) or mostly (58%) adequate.<br />
• Respondents felt that the timeframe between<br />
the patient seeing the GP and<br />
then being seen by the provider was<br />
‘very timely’ (36%) or ‘timely (61%).<br />
• 78% felt that the role <strong>of</strong> the programme<br />
coordinator was ‘very useful’ in assisting<br />
them, with 68% indicating that the coordinator<br />
was ‘very useful’ in following up<br />
patients who did not attend appointments.<br />
• Overall, 55% <strong>of</strong> providers felt that<br />
the PLO programme was ‘very useful’<br />
as a model <strong>of</strong> care, and a further<br />
29% that it was ‘quite useful’.<br />
‘I believe the programme only touches the surface<br />
<strong>of</strong> the true need. It is evident to me most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
people that came for counselling would not have<br />
accessed help if they did not have this programme.<br />
<strong>The</strong> outcomes for the clients appeared in the main<br />
to have made a significant difference to their lives.’<br />
Lessons and messages<br />
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
This pilot programme did not seek to demonstrate<br />
efficacy (upskilling, manage problems,<br />
reduce escalation). Rather, it focused on the<br />
utility <strong>of</strong> the model in primary care—is it practicable;<br />
does it work as a referral pathway within<br />
primary care? It introduced a number <strong>of</strong> new<br />
processes for both GPs and patients. Firstly, it<br />
utilised a now well-validated screening tool, the<br />
CHAT, 7 and, secondly, it gave the GP 30 minutes<br />
<strong>of</strong> dedicated time to discuss this and work<br />
with the patient to select a treatment provider.<br />
Thirdly, a coordinator facilitated the patient’s<br />
entrée to a wide choice <strong>of</strong> treatment providers external<br />
to their GP, and was available to deal with<br />
any follow-up <strong>issue</strong>s with the provider. Fourthly,<br />
the pathway was able to be ‘wrapped up’ by the<br />
patient seeing their GP for a dedicated follow-up<br />
consult to review progress. <strong>The</strong> whole process<br />
was funded, thereby enabling people who otherwise<br />
could not access this amount <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
time to do so, at an earlier stage in their mental<br />
health/lifestyle problem than would otherwise<br />
be possible under existing referral pathways. It is<br />
a novel approach to an old problem. Does it work<br />
in practice?<br />
Feedback from all parties concerned has clearly<br />
shown widespread approval. Patients regarded<br />
the programme favourably, and some poignant<br />
comments were given in their feedback. It was<br />
important that the processes were practicable<br />
from the GP perspective, and generally the<br />
participating GPs rated the process well; 95%<br />
indicated they would continue their involvement<br />
with the programme. Likewise, external<br />
treatment providers—counsellors, psychologists,<br />
etc.—were generally approving <strong>of</strong> the programme,<br />
with 84% rating it as ‘very’ or ‘quite’ useful and<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 55
iMPROViNg PERfORMANCE<br />
ACkNOwLEDgEMENTS<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors warmly<br />
thank Maureen Langwell,<br />
Programme Coordinator,<br />
Primary Lifestyle Options<br />
at Harbour Health PHO,<br />
for her enthusiastic work<br />
on this project. <strong>The</strong><br />
support <strong>of</strong> participating<br />
Harbour Health and<br />
HealthWEST PHO GPs is<br />
gratefully acknowledged.<br />
This study was funded<br />
by the Waitemata<br />
District Health Board.<br />
COMPETiNg iNTERESTS<br />
None declared.<br />
100% felt they were referred appropriate patients<br />
for the services they provided.<br />
As such, the basic model does not require major<br />
changes as all processes were acceptable and<br />
practicable for the majority <strong>of</strong> patients, providers<br />
and GPs. However, there are some caveats to address<br />
if this programme is to move forward. Some<br />
patients felt under pressure at the time <strong>of</strong> consultation,<br />
preferring to take the CHAT home to answer;<br />
in future they need to be given this option.<br />
Completion <strong>of</strong> the programme by attending the<br />
follow-up GP consult was variable, and has continued<br />
to be so post–30 June. This appears to be<br />
redundant for those who were referred internally,<br />
i.e. consulted their GP for interventions or when<br />
they have had their needs adequately met by an<br />
external provider who has written a report to the<br />
GP. In future, this will be an optional component<br />
<strong>of</strong> the model. Moving to an online version was<br />
suggested by a number <strong>of</strong> GPs, so this too will be<br />
available in the next iteration.<br />
In conclusion, the Primary Lifestyle Options pilot<br />
appears to be well regarded by participants—<br />
patients, GPs and other treatment providers—and<br />
is realistic and practicable. It could be easily taken<br />
up by other PHOs, requiring only local adaptation<br />
<strong>of</strong> material in the Resource Manual. This<br />
programme enables identification in the primary<br />
care setting <strong>of</strong> mild to moderate mental health or<br />
lifestyle problems and initiation <strong>of</strong> a treatment<br />
pathway that, in many cases at least, would not<br />
otherwise occur.<br />
References<br />
1. MaGPIe Research Group. <strong>The</strong> nature and prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
psychological problems in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> primary healthcare:<br />
a report on Mental Health and <strong>General</strong> Practice<br />
Investigation (MaGPIe). NZ Med J 2003;116:U379<br />
2. Hutton C, Gunn J. Do longer consultations improve the<br />
management <strong>of</strong> psychological problems in general practice?<br />
A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res<br />
2007:7:71.<br />
3. Collings S, MaGPIe Research Group. Disability and the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> mental disorder in primary care. Soc Psych<br />
Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:994–1002.<br />
4. <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe Research Group. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> casefinding<br />
for mental health problems in primary care. Br J<br />
Gen Pract 2005;55:665–9.<br />
5. Goodyear-Smith F, Coupe N, Arroll B, Elley C, Sullivan<br />
S, McGill A. Case-finding <strong>of</strong> lifestyle and mental health<br />
problems in primary care: validation <strong>of</strong> the ‘CHAT’. Br J<br />
Gen Pract 2008;58:26–31.<br />
6. Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Fishman T, Gunn J.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> a ‘help’ question to two screening<br />
questions on specificity for diagnosis <strong>of</strong> depression in<br />
general practice: diagnostic validity study. BMJ 2005;<br />
331(7521):884.<br />
7. Lyness JM, Heo M, Datto CJ. Outcomes <strong>of</strong> minor and subsyndromal<br />
depression among elderly patients in primary<br />
care settings. Ann Intern Med 2006;144(7):496–504.<br />
8. Hawker D. Increasing initial attendance at mental health<br />
out-patient clinics: opt-in systems and other interventions.<br />
Psych Bull 2007;31:179–82.<br />
9. MacDonald J, Brown N, Ellis P. Using telephone prompts<br />
to improve initial attendance at a community mental health<br />
center. Psychiatr Serv 2000;51:812–4.<br />
10. Ohayon MM, Roth T. Place <strong>of</strong> chronic insomnia in the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> depressive and anxiety disorders. J Psychiatric<br />
Res 2003;37:9–15.<br />
We were shocked to hear <strong>of</strong> Jill Calveley’s tragic, unexpected death on 30 December. As well as her role as the Clinical Director<br />
<strong>of</strong> Harbour Health PHO, Jill has made significant contributions in numerous parts <strong>of</strong> the health sector as a rural GP, within primary<br />
and secondary care organisations, the Accident Compensation Corporation and NGOs. As well as general practice, Jill had<br />
qualifications in epidemiology, public health and philosophy and was able to engage with the health sector from a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
perspectives. She passionately believed that the sole purpose <strong>of</strong> the health service is to improve the health <strong>of</strong> people. She brought<br />
her compassion and her critical appraisal skills to all her many roles. Her legacy is huge and she is sadly missed—Editor.<br />
56 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
gPs should prescribe more<br />
benzodiazepines for the elderly<br />
yES<br />
We should stop moralizing and start prescribing<br />
benzodiazepines when required (for the<br />
elderly and others).<br />
I am currently cautious about prescribing<br />
benzodiazepines as I am concerned that, if I am<br />
too liberal, my colleagues may think I am a low<br />
quality physician. I am sure this is the prevailing<br />
mood amongst GPs, although I sense that<br />
psychiatrists are less cautious than we are. Many<br />
years ago I was involved in a practice where we<br />
(the new GPs) thought too many <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
were on benzodiazepines and proceeded to wean<br />
them <strong>of</strong>f. This was a difficult task that required<br />
a lot <strong>of</strong> confrontation and conflict with the<br />
patients and, in many cases, we were unsuccessful<br />
in ‘assisting’ them to stop. <strong>The</strong> patients were<br />
functioning well and the problem seemed to be<br />
ours not theirs. <strong>The</strong>ir only concern was getting<br />
their repeat prescriptions as they realised they<br />
would have uncomfortable nights <strong>of</strong> sleep if<br />
they stopped them suddenly. Thus the ‘harm’<br />
for these patients was my/our high moral stance<br />
<strong>of</strong> thinking they should stop. Over the years I<br />
have seen many patients on long-term benzodiazepines,<br />
rarely prescribed by myself, and have<br />
had to suppress the mild irritation I feel if my<br />
colleagues start patients on these medications.<br />
In recent times I have had a rethink. I recently<br />
wrote a chapter on anxiety for a British medical<br />
textbook (in press) and was aware that benzodiazepines<br />
are effective for anxiety but there is<br />
concern about habituation and ‘addiction’. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>issue</strong> came to light recently when I was confronted<br />
by a 71-year-old patient who was having<br />
nightmares so severe they were affecting her the<br />
next day. She was not clinically depressed, nor<br />
did she have anxiety on gold standard questionnaires.<br />
I discussed with her the options. She<br />
could try a low dose tricyclic, a benzodiazepine<br />
or even quetiapine. I said the benzodiazepine<br />
would probably eliminate her nightmares but she<br />
would probably be on it forever and that when<br />
she was in her 80s she may be more prone to fall<br />
and break her hip (the numbers needed to harm,<br />
i.e break a hip in this situation is 91). 1 She was<br />
not concerned by the falling and I felt I had fully<br />
informed her <strong>of</strong> her options. Even more recently<br />
I spoke to an 87-year-old man who is on 0.5mg <strong>of</strong><br />
lorazepam prescribed by his GP. He is sleeping<br />
well now, but previously complained endlessly<br />
about his poor sleep. He has also had a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> falls since starting this medication. I asked<br />
him what would he prefer: having a good night’s<br />
sleep and having falls, or not sleeping and having<br />
While evidence can help inform best practice, it needs to be placed in context.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re may be no evidence available or applicable for a specific patient with<br />
his or her own set <strong>of</strong> conditions, capabilities, beliefs, expectations and social<br />
circumstances. <strong>The</strong>re are areas <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, ethics and aspects <strong>of</strong> care for which<br />
there is no one right answer. <strong>General</strong> practice is an art as well as a science. Quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> care also lies with the nature <strong>of</strong> the clinical relationship, with communication and<br />
with truly informed decision-making. <strong>The</strong> BACk to BACk section stimulates<br />
debate, with two pr<strong>of</strong>essionals presenting their opposing views regarding a clinical,<br />
ethical or political <strong>issue</strong>.<br />
Bruce Arroll<br />
BACk TO BACk<br />
Bruce Arroll<br />
MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice and Primary<br />
Health Care,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Private Bag 92019,<br />
Auckland;<br />
b.arroll@<br />
auckland.ac.nz<br />
Ngaire Kerse<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 57<br />
BACk to BACk this <strong>issue</strong>:
BACk TO BACk<br />
fewer/no falls? He chose the former. He now goes<br />
to the toilet at night with his walking stick to ensure<br />
that he does not fall. I have asked a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> elderly patients about their benzodiazepines<br />
and they all prefer the good night’s sleep. Sleeping<br />
poorly is a considerable bother to those that<br />
suffer from it and the promise <strong>of</strong> sleeping well<br />
is immediate and welcomed. I would contend<br />
most would choose the short-term option against<br />
the hazard <strong>of</strong> a (small chance <strong>of</strong>) fractured hip at<br />
some distant point in the future.<br />
Insomnia and anxiety are <strong>of</strong>ten chronic conditions.<br />
It is interesting to consider that we consider<br />
diabetes a chronic condition and are happy to<br />
give long-term metformin, aspirin and statins to<br />
all, in spite <strong>of</strong> the (small) harms that accompany<br />
Insomnia is only a trivial condition<br />
for those who don’t have it<br />
these medications. Anxiety is a long-term condition,<br />
yet when standard treatments fail, we are<br />
reluctant to consider long-term benzodiazepine.<br />
Is this moralizing on our part or perhaps can<br />
we be a bit more rational? We know that the<br />
numbers needed to treat for cognitive behavioural<br />
therapy are about five for anxiety 2 and that for<br />
SSRIs they are also about five. 3 For some patients<br />
no other treatment works, so in those situations<br />
we should consider <strong>of</strong>fering benzodiazepines.<br />
We need to fully inform the patients. We need<br />
to say: this will help you sleep, but you may not<br />
be able to stop taking it (hence you will be on it<br />
indefinitely) and you may be more likely to fall<br />
when you are older. <strong>The</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> breaking your<br />
hip when not taking these medications (antidepressants<br />
and anxiolytics) is 10.1% and with these<br />
medications 11.2%. 1 What would you like to do?<br />
I would imagine most insomniac elderly patients<br />
would go for the benzodiazepines and take the<br />
risk. Insomnia is only a trivial condition for those<br />
who don’t have it. Philosophically I am not sure<br />
I want the whole nation on benezodiazepines as<br />
in Aldous Huxley’s Brave <strong>New</strong> World where the<br />
citizens were on their soma, but anxiety and insomnia<br />
are two conditions that are very prevalent<br />
in primary care (4.9% <strong>of</strong> men over 65 and 7.8%<br />
<strong>of</strong> women over 65 have anxiety 4 ) and 44% report<br />
insomnia from our unpublished data (2008).<br />
How should we do it? <strong>The</strong>re is evidence that falls<br />
are more likely in the first five days <strong>of</strong> starting<br />
benzodiazepines (odds ratio 3.43), but after 30<br />
days this risk becomes non-significant. 5 What I<br />
would take from this is that we should start with<br />
a low dose (e.g. 0.25mg lorazepam) and slowly<br />
increase as necessary. We should also monitor the<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> falling and encourage the use <strong>of</strong> walkers<br />
and walking sticks.<br />
Summary<br />
For the elderly (and for any age) I think it is<br />
worth trying other treatments for insomnia and<br />
anxiety. Where those treatments do not work, I<br />
think we should abandon our moral superiority<br />
and fully inform patients about a legal and therapeutically-effective<br />
medication that has some<br />
adverse effects (like any medication). We need to<br />
be more patient-focused and less concerned about<br />
what our colleagues think <strong>of</strong> us. We should stop<br />
moralizing and start prescribing benzodiazepines<br />
when required (for the elderly and others).<br />
References<br />
1. Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C, Watts N, Wactawski-Wende<br />
J, Jackson RD, LeB<strong>of</strong>f MS, Lewis CE, Chen Z,<br />
Stefanick ML, Cauley J. Factors associated with 5-year<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA<br />
2007;298(20):2389–98.<br />
2. http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/<br />
ceweb/conditions/meh/1002/1002_I1.jsp; accessed 27<br />
June 2008.<br />
3. Kapczinski F, Lima MS, Souza JS, Cunha A, Schmitt<br />
R. Antidepressants for generalized anxiety disorder.<br />
Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Sys Rev 2003, Issue 2. Art. No.:<br />
CD003592. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003592.<br />
4. MaGPIe Research Group. <strong>The</strong> nature and prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> psychological problems in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> primary<br />
healthcare: a report on mental health and general practice<br />
investigation (MAGPIE). NZ Med J 2003;116:1171–1185.<br />
5. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, F. Glaeske, G. <strong>New</strong> use <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepines and<br />
the risk <strong>of</strong> hip fracture: A case-crossover study. Z Gerontol<br />
Geriatr 2006;39(2):143–8.<br />
58 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
gPs should prescribe more<br />
benzodiazepines for the elderly<br />
NO<br />
<strong>The</strong> answer is undoubtedly ‘no’, we are using too<br />
many <strong>of</strong> these dangerous, unnecessary medications<br />
and should be prescribing fewer. Resist<br />
the urge to take the easy way out—undoubtedly<br />
proposed by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Arroll—and to use these<br />
drugs for inappropriate indications where the<br />
risks clearly outweigh the benefits. <strong>The</strong> risk for<br />
older people from using benzodiazepines is high.<br />
How much are we using them?<br />
Taking residential care as a key setting: 46% <strong>of</strong><br />
residents in 1999 took psychotropic medication. 1<br />
In 2005, 25% were taking short-acting sedatives, 2<br />
with benzodiazepines being one <strong>of</strong> the most commonly<br />
used. In the community it is more difficult<br />
to gauge accurate estimates <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepine use.<br />
<strong>The</strong> age standardised prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepine<br />
use in Auckland general practice was 3.4%<br />
for patients over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age in 1992; however<br />
use was predominantly in the elderly (70% were<br />
over 60 years <strong>of</strong> age) and female (62.5%).<br />
In the 2004–2005 Australian National Health<br />
Survey, anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedative<br />
prescriptions make up approximately 4–5% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total prescriptions written by Australian general<br />
practitioners and 10% <strong>of</strong> patients used medication<br />
for anxiety or nerves. 3<br />
How much should we be using them?<br />
Anxiety disorder may be one <strong>of</strong> the only appropriate<br />
indications, where the benefits outweigh<br />
the risks <strong>of</strong> prescribing benzodiazepines.<br />
<strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> anxiety in the community is<br />
14.8% over one year and only 9.8 for the previous<br />
month. 4 <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe study primary care mental<br />
health survey in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> shows that 15% <strong>of</strong><br />
all people get treated with psychotropic medication;<br />
5 however 12-month prevalence <strong>of</strong> anxiety<br />
disorder in general practice attenders aged 65+<br />
was only 4.9% for men and 7.8% for women in<br />
2003. <strong>The</strong>re is a clear mismatch between diagnosis<br />
and prescribing and it is likely that much <strong>of</strong><br />
the benzodiazepines use observed in community<br />
dwelling older people is related to treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
sleep disorder.<br />
what’s wrong with using<br />
them in late life?<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is little right with using benzodiazepines<br />
in late life. Reactions to benzodiazepines are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten paradoxical and long-term management is<br />
notoriously problematic. 6 Apart from the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
confusion and development <strong>of</strong> tolerance, falls are<br />
the most problematic result <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepine<br />
use. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> hypnotics on balance, gait and<br />
equilibrium are the consequence <strong>of</strong> differential<br />
negative impacts on vigilance and cognitive functions,<br />
and are highly dose- and time-dependent.<br />
It is not surprising that almost no guideline<br />
recommends use <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepines for older<br />
people, i.e. Beers criteria for appropriate use <strong>of</strong><br />
medications. 7<br />
More importantly, the risk <strong>of</strong> fracture is increased<br />
by over 30%. <strong>The</strong> RR <strong>of</strong> fracture associated<br />
with use <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepines was 1.34 (95%<br />
CI 1.24, 1.45) in one systematic review <strong>of</strong> 23<br />
studies. 8 While any benzodiazepines carried the<br />
risk, it was higher for those taking the short-acting<br />
high-potency benzodiazepine (IRR, 1.27; 95%<br />
CI, 1.01–1.59), during the first two weeks after<br />
starting a benzodiazepine (IRR, 2.05; 95% CI,<br />
1.28–3.28), during the second two weeks after<br />
starting a benzodiazepine (IRR, 1.88; 95% CI,<br />
1.15–3.07), and for continued use (IRR, 1.18; 95%<br />
CI, 1.03–1.35), so short half-life benzodiazepines<br />
BACk TO BACk<br />
Ngaire kerse<br />
MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP<br />
Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>General</strong> Practice and<br />
Primary Health Care,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Private Bag 92019,<br />
Auckland;<br />
n.kerse@auckland.ac.nz<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 59
BACk TO BACk<br />
are not safer than long half-life benzodiazepines.<br />
Hip fracture risk is highest during the first two<br />
weeks after starting a benzodiazepine. Those older<br />
people that just want something in the shortterm<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> a recent stress are at highest<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> hip fracture from your prescriptions. Even<br />
with a reasonably high NNT, hip fracture is a<br />
devastating event. Less than 50% <strong>of</strong> those with<br />
hip fracture regain pre-fracture function and 20%<br />
die within 12 months after hip fracture.<br />
In a large group <strong>of</strong> cognitively normal Canadians,<br />
the frequency <strong>of</strong> falls was 60% greater in benzodiazepine<br />
users compared to non-users. Our own<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor John Campbell successfully reduced the<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> falls to 18% (an NNT to cause a fall <strong>of</strong> 2),<br />
in an RCT <strong>of</strong> older people on benzodiazepines,<br />
by reducing the dose <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepine gradually<br />
over six months and continuing a placebo tablet.<br />
Unfortunately after unblinding, half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
older people in the intervention group returned<br />
to the GP to get their prescription successfully<br />
renewed! Systematic reviews also identified that<br />
chronic consumers <strong>of</strong> benzodiazepines are more<br />
susceptible to the appearance and progression <strong>of</strong><br />
many acute and chronic diseases (infectious and<br />
malignant diseases).<br />
<strong>The</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> using this medication usually far outweighs<br />
the benefits and use should be restricted to<br />
those with moderate to severe anxiety disorders.<br />
Are they needed for insomnia?<br />
Benzodiazepines do improve sleep; however more<br />
patients receiving benzodiazepines reported adverse<br />
effects, especially daytime drowsiness and<br />
dizziness or light-headedness (common odds ratio<br />
1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4) compared with other sleep<br />
treatments. Cognitive function decline including<br />
memory impairment was reported in several <strong>of</strong><br />
the studies and Zopiclone was not found to be superior<br />
to benzodiazepines on any <strong>of</strong> the outcome<br />
measures examined.<br />
A large systematic review compared sleep<br />
pharmacotreatments. Benzodiazepines were no<br />
better than non-benzodiazepines in reducing time<br />
to sleep. All drug groups had a statistically significant<br />
higher risk <strong>of</strong> harm compared to placebo, but<br />
benzodiazepines had the highest risk difference.<br />
Non-pharmacological treatment for insomnia is<br />
very effective. When identified accurately, primary<br />
insomnia responds best to sleep restriction<br />
techniques and medications are seldom needed for<br />
those in late life. If it is not primary insomnia<br />
then an underlying disorder, such as pain,<br />
depression or restless leg syndrome should be<br />
sought and appropriate treatment started.<br />
Can we stop them?<br />
It is relatively easy to encourage stopping benzodiazepines.<br />
A simple letter to patients using<br />
these drugs may be effective in reducing useage.<br />
Recognised tapering protocols are available and<br />
reasonably successful. Older people sleep less and<br />
relaxation and sleep hygiene along with sleep<br />
restriction can be very successful in improving<br />
satisfaction with sleep. Take it slow and make<br />
sure the older person wants to stop.<br />
So don’t be persuaded by the Pr<strong>of</strong>essor. We are<br />
currently using too many benzodiazepines in<br />
older people and exposing them to unacceptable<br />
risk associated with their use.<br />
We are definitely NOT under-prescribing<br />
benzodiazepines for older people.<br />
References<br />
1. Kerse N. Medication use in residential care. NZ Fam Phys<br />
2005;32:251–5.<br />
2. Peri K, Kerse N, Kiata L, Wilkinson T, Robinson E, Parsons<br />
J, et al. Promoting independence in residential care:<br />
Successful recruitment for a randomised controlled trial.<br />
JAMDA. 2007:doi10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.008.<br />
3. Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Health and Welfare. <strong>General</strong> practice<br />
activity in Australia 2004-05. Canberra: AIHW; 2005.<br />
4. Browne MO, Wells J, Scott K. Te Rau Hinengaro: <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong> Mental Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Health; 2006.<br />
5. Bushnell J, McLeod D, Dowell A, Salmond C, Ramage S,<br />
Collings S, et al. <strong>The</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> common mental health<br />
problems in general practice. Fam Pract 2006;23(1):53–9.<br />
6. Mathew VM, Dursun SM, Reveley MA. Increased aggressive,<br />
violent, and impulsive behaviour in patients during<br />
chronic-prolonged benzodiazepine use. Can J Psychiatr -<br />
Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 2000 Feb;45(1):89–90.<br />
7. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, Waller JL, Maclean JR,<br />
Beers MH. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate<br />
medication use in older adults: results <strong>of</strong> a US consensus<br />
panel <strong>of</strong> experts. Arch Int Med 2003;163:2716–24.<br />
8. Takkouche B, Montes-Martinez A, Gill SS, Etminan M.<br />
Psychotropic medications and the risk <strong>of</strong> fracture: a metaanalysis.<br />
Drug Safety 2007;30(2):171–84.<br />
(Further references available from: n.kerse@auckland.ac.nz)<br />
60 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Patient Oriented Evidence that Matters<br />
Psychological interventions reduce onset<br />
<strong>of</strong> depression<br />
CLiNiCAL qUEsTiON: Do behavioural interventions reduce<br />
the risk <strong>of</strong> new onset depression?<br />
BOTTOM LiNE: Behavioural interventions to prevent depression<br />
reduce the incidence <strong>of</strong> newly diagnosed depression. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the studies included in this report were <strong>of</strong> cognitive behavioural<br />
therapy interventions in group format for individuals at<br />
increased risk for major depression. (LOE=1a-)<br />
REfERENCE: Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Smit F, Mihalopoulos<br />
C. Beekman A. Preventing the onset <strong>of</strong> depressive distorders:<br />
A meta-analytic review <strong>of</strong> psychological interventions. Am J<br />
Psychiatry 2008;165(10):1272–1280.<br />
sTUdy dEsigN: Meta-analysis (randomised controlled trials)<br />
fUNdiNg: Unknown/not stated<br />
ALLOCATiON: Concealed<br />
sETTiNg: Various (meta-analysis)<br />
syNOPsis: This is a meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> randomised trials to<br />
prevent depression using behavioural interventions. <strong>The</strong><br />
primary outcome was incident cases <strong>of</strong> depression. Because the<br />
length <strong>of</strong> the studies varied, the incidence rates were calculated<br />
by the authors in person-years. A total <strong>of</strong> 19 studies with 5806<br />
participants met inclusion criteria, one <strong>of</strong> which tested three<br />
different preventive interventions, for a total <strong>of</strong> 21 comparisons.<br />
Seven studies were about preventing postpartum depression,<br />
and the rest included various other targets, such as school and<br />
primary care settings. <strong>The</strong>re were three types <strong>of</strong> prevention;<br />
universal (two), selective programmes aimed at high-risk groups<br />
(11), and prevention aimed at individuals with depressive<br />
symptoms who do not meet the criteria for a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> major<br />
depression (eight). <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> interventions were cognitive<br />
behavioural therapy (15). Group format was used in 18<br />
comparisons. <strong>The</strong> incidence ratio <strong>of</strong> new depression per<br />
person-year was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65–0.93), indicating a reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> depressive disorders by 22% in the intervention<br />
groups compared with control groups. <strong>The</strong> authors<br />
calculated the number needed to treat as 22.<br />
© 1995–2009 John Wiley & Sons Inc. All Rights Reserved. www.infopoems.com<br />
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
CBT is effective for self-harm<br />
CLiNiCAL qUEsTiON: Is cognitive behavioural therapy an<br />
effective treatment for self-harm?<br />
BOTTOM LiNE: A brief series <strong>of</strong> cognitive behavioural therapy<br />
(CBT) sessions reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> self-harm and improves a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> other important psychological outcomes. (LOE=1b-)<br />
REfERENCE: Slee N, Garnefski N, van der Leeden R,<br />
Arensman E, Spinhoven P. Cognitive-behavioural intervention<br />
for self-harm: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psych<br />
2008;192:202–211.<br />
sTUdy dEsigN: Randomised controlled trial (nonblinded)<br />
fUNdiNg: Government<br />
sETTiNg: Outpatient (specialty)<br />
ALLOCATiON: Concealed<br />
POEMs<br />
syNOPsis: Self-harm is a poorly studied but psychologically<br />
devastating condition. In this study, 90 patients in the Netherlands<br />
with a recent history <strong>of</strong> self-harm were randomised to<br />
either CBT or treatment as usual. Of the 48 patients assigned<br />
to CBT, only 40 began the therapy but all 40 attended all 12<br />
sessions (the first 10 were weekly). Eight <strong>of</strong> 42 patients in the<br />
treatment-as-usual group were lost to follow-up because <strong>of</strong> suicide,<br />
severe psychological problems, or other reasons. Analysis<br />
was by modified intention to treat; the patients who did not<br />
begin the CBT were excluded. Patients were between the ages<br />
<strong>of</strong> 15 years and 35 years, and more than 90% were women. At<br />
nine months, the number <strong>of</strong> self-harm episodes in the previous<br />
three months declined more in the CBT group, from 14.4<br />
to 1.2, compared with a decline from 11.6 to 4.6 in the usual<br />
treatment group (P < .05). Secondary outcomes (depression,<br />
anxiety, self-esteem, helplessness, problem-solving, unlovability,<br />
and poor distress tolerance) all improved significantly more<br />
in the CBT group.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 61
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
PEARLs COCHRANE CORNER<br />
String <strong>of</strong> PEARLS<br />
Practical Evidence About Real Life Situations<br />
PEARLS are succinct summaries <strong>of</strong> Cochrane systematic Reviews<br />
for primary care practitioners—developed by the Cochrane Primary<br />
Care Field, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Branch <strong>of</strong> the Australasian Cochrane Centre<br />
at the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practice and Primary Health Care,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, funded by the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Guidelines Group<br />
and published in NZ Doctor.<br />
Psychological therapy based on CBT is effective<br />
short-term treatment for generalised anxiety disorder<br />
Musical therapy for depression may improve mood<br />
Psychosocial & psychological interventions are<br />
effective for postpartum depression<br />
Antidepressants are effective for neuropathic pain<br />
No evidence supports use <strong>of</strong> antidepressants for<br />
nonspecific low-back pain<br />
CBT for tinnitus improves quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
CBT is possible treatment for children with recurrent<br />
abdominal pain<br />
disCLAiMER: PEARLs are for educational use only and are not meant<br />
to guide clinical activity, nor are they a clinical guideline.<br />
Benzodiazepines may hasten<br />
improvement in major<br />
depression for up to six weeks<br />
Bruce Arroll MBChB, PhD, FRNZCGP, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practice<br />
and Primary Health Care, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, Private Bag 92019,<br />
Auckland; Email: b.arroll@auckland.ac.nz<br />
THE PROBLEM: Depression <strong>of</strong>ten presents with anxiety. <strong>The</strong><br />
rate <strong>of</strong> anxiety comorbidity among patients with depression<br />
varies from 33% to 85%. Reviews <strong>of</strong> randomised controlled<br />
trials show, however, that anxiolytic benzodiazepines, with<br />
the possible exception <strong>of</strong> some triazolo-benzodiazepines for<br />
mild to moderate depression, are less effective than standard<br />
antidepressants in treating major depression. <strong>The</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong><br />
adding benzodiazepines to antidepressants are unclear. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
are suggestions that benzodiazepines may lose their efficacy<br />
with long-term administration and that their chronic use carries<br />
risks <strong>of</strong> dependence.<br />
CLiNiCAL BOTTOM LiNE: Benzodiazepines are effective<br />
in improving depression symptoms for the first six weeks,<br />
but after that appear to have no benefit. <strong>The</strong>y seem to work<br />
in addition to tricylic antidepressants such as imipramine in<br />
moderate to high doses (100 to 145mg) with triazolam 0.5mg<br />
and fluoxetine 20 to 40mg with clonazepam 0.5 to 1mg. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
are concerns about the risk <strong>of</strong> hip fracture in the elderly but<br />
the NNH=90 for those on antidepressants/anxiolytics. 1<br />
Table 1. Major depression<br />
Benzodiazepines<br />
in addition to<br />
antidepressants<br />
Success Evidence Harms<br />
At six weeks<br />
NNT=8<br />
(range 5 to 29)<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
improved<br />
symptoms<br />
NNT = numbers needed to treat<br />
NNH = numbers needed to harm<br />
References<br />
Cochrane<br />
review 2<br />
No additional<br />
benefit after six<br />
weeks plus risk <strong>of</strong><br />
addiction.<br />
NNH =90 for hip<br />
fracture in elderly<br />
1. Robbins J. Aragaki AK. Kooperberg C. Watts N. Wactawski-Wende J. Jackson<br />
RD. LeB<strong>of</strong>f Ms. Lewis CE. Chen Z. stefanick ML. Cauley J. Factors associated<br />
with 5-year risk <strong>of</strong> hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 2007;<br />
298(20):2389–98.<br />
2. Furukawa TA, streiner DL, Young LT, Kinoshita Y. Antidepressants plus benzodiazepines<br />
for major depression. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> syst Rev 2001; Issue 3.<br />
Art. No.: CD001026. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001026. All people residing<br />
in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> have access to the Cochrane Library via the Ministry website<br />
www.moh.govt.nz/cochranelibrary<br />
62 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Bridging two worlds in the interview process<br />
—the psychiatric assessment and Maori in primary care<br />
Pamela Ara Bennett MBChB, FRANZCP<br />
Mental health is an area <strong>of</strong><br />
particular concern for Maori.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Mason Durie has<br />
stated that mental health is the greatest<br />
health problem facing Maori in the first<br />
two decades <strong>of</strong> this century. 1<br />
<strong>The</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> mental health <strong>issue</strong>s<br />
across cultures is recognised as being<br />
fraught with difficulty. Psychiatry is<br />
unlike other medical disciplines in that<br />
the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> functional psychiatric<br />
disorders is based <strong>entire</strong>ly on the clinical<br />
interaction. <strong>The</strong> DSM-IV acknowledges<br />
difficulties may be encountered when<br />
applying DSM-IV diagnostic criteria<br />
across cultures, and has produced an<br />
outline for cultural formulations in<br />
psychiatric assessment. 2<br />
This paper aims to assist the primary<br />
care clinician to (i) develop empathic<br />
therapeutic relationships with their<br />
Maori patients and whanau through<br />
acknowledging difference and building<br />
CORREsPONdENCE TO:<br />
Pamela Ara Bennett<br />
Psychiatrist and senior<br />
Lecturer, Te Kupenga Hauora<br />
Maori, school <strong>of</strong> Population<br />
Health, <strong>The</strong> University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Auckland, PB 92019,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
pam.bennett@auckland.ac.nz<br />
Pounamu<br />
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
the notion <strong>of</strong> cultural difference into the<br />
clinical assessment process, and (ii) make<br />
diagnostic and management decisions<br />
based on their clinical knowledge, enhanced<br />
by such therapeutic relationships.<br />
To achieve these aims I use a fictional case<br />
history, based on my own clinical experience,<br />
and a modified version <strong>of</strong> the DSM-<br />
IV outline for cultural formulation. 3<br />
Case history<br />
Matiu, a tall handsome 17-year-old,<br />
comes into your <strong>of</strong>fice with his Aunt<br />
Estelle and older brother Manu. Matiu<br />
sits down in the chair the furthest away<br />
and looks at the ground. He obviously<br />
is not happy and says nothing. Auntie<br />
introduces herself and her two nephews.<br />
She is a retired social worker who<br />
worked in a large city hospital. She asks<br />
if the other whanau members outside<br />
may come in so the meeting can begin<br />
with karakia. An older man stands and<br />
prays in Maori. Whanau members then<br />
introduce themselves. You introduce<br />
yourself from a pr<strong>of</strong>essional perspective—‘I<br />
am Dr McDonald. I have been<br />
working as a general practitioner in this<br />
practice for six years. I spent three years<br />
working down south in Hokitika.’<br />
Auntie begins Matiu’s story. Matiu lives<br />
with his mother and older brother in<br />
MAoRi PRiMARy HEALtH cARE tREASuRES<br />
Pounamu (greenstone) is the most precious <strong>of</strong> stone to Maori.<br />
POUNAMU<br />
a large city. His parents divorced years<br />
ago. Mother never remarried. Two elder<br />
sisters are married and live elsewhere.<br />
Matiu is in his last year <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />
school, excels in rugby, dreams <strong>of</strong> being<br />
an All Black. He has many friends and<br />
was ‘going steady’ with Ara. Brother<br />
Manu is doing well at university after<br />
a year overseas, on a scholarship. Manu<br />
explains Matiu began to withdraw into<br />
himself about nine months ago (stayed<br />
in his bedroom, stopped football, broke<br />
with Ara, refused to speak to anyone).<br />
He was suspicious <strong>of</strong> everyone (mother,<br />
sisters, football coach, friends). He believed<br />
‘everyone was against him’. Matiu<br />
told Manu that he was hearing voices<br />
talking about him, arguing about him<br />
and telling him he was no good. <strong>The</strong><br />
voices were telling him that he might<br />
as well kill himself. Sometimes Matiu<br />
thought it was the neighbours outside<br />
his window, but he was never able to<br />
catch them, and the same voices were<br />
giving him the same messages through<br />
music so he had stopped listening. He<br />
was very distressed. Mother said Matiu<br />
had stopped eating and had been pacing<br />
the floor most nights, mumbling to himself.<br />
She says he is a very good boy and<br />
had never acted like this before.<br />
Until this stage in the proceedings you<br />
have been encouraging the family to tell<br />
their story and listening.<br />
‘Ahakoa he iti, he pounamu’<br />
(Although it is small, it is valuable)<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 63
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
POUNAMU<br />
On direct questioning Matiu just looks<br />
away. At one stage he mutters something<br />
unintelligible, looking sharply<br />
upwards and the older man who is his<br />
grandfather, puts an arm on his shoulder<br />
soothing him.<br />
You enquire if anyone else in the family<br />
has had difficulty like this. A distant<br />
cousin was in a psychiatric hospital years<br />
ago, no one knows why. She has passed<br />
away now.<br />
Matiu’s family are certain there is no<br />
drug involvement. He has been at home<br />
with no visitors. Manu has been to<br />
check with their mutual friends.<br />
<strong>The</strong> diagnosis is clearly <strong>of</strong> a psychosis.<br />
However there are many unanswered<br />
questions:<br />
• Is the psychosis functional (e.g.<br />
schizophreniform), organic (e.g.<br />
drug induced) or affective (e.g.<br />
depression, with mood congruent<br />
hallucinations and delusions)?<br />
• What role do cultural beliefs<br />
play in this presentation?<br />
• If hospitalisation and medication<br />
are required, as seems likely,<br />
how should this be managed?<br />
• What are the long-term needs <strong>of</strong><br />
this patient and his whanau likely<br />
to include and how should they<br />
be planned for and managed?<br />
Key factors in the assessment<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> mental<br />
health problems amongst Maori<br />
<strong>The</strong> following are key factors in the<br />
assessment and management <strong>of</strong> mental<br />
health problems amongst Maori necessary<br />
for the development <strong>of</strong> a management<br />
plan which is safe, useful and<br />
acceptable to the patient, clinician and<br />
whanau:<br />
(a) Ascertain the self-defined cultural<br />
identity <strong>of</strong> your patient from the<br />
outset. Cultural identity cannot<br />
be determined from appearance.<br />
Matiu looks Maori, but how does<br />
he identify? Matiu is almost silent<br />
during the consultation; however he<br />
should be asked how he identifies,<br />
culturally, as should his whanau.<br />
(b) Patient and whanau views <strong>of</strong> the<br />
illness. Maori views <strong>of</strong> well-being<br />
and illness may differ from those <strong>of</strong><br />
Western medicine. Listening to the<br />
views <strong>of</strong> patient and whanau about<br />
the illness will both assist you in<br />
the assessment process and enhance<br />
the therapeutic relationship. Keep in<br />
mind and bring up as appropriate:<br />
• What do they think is wrong?<br />
• Is there a name for it?<br />
• What may have caused it?<br />
• What, in their view,<br />
should be done now?<br />
• What do they think will<br />
be the outcome?<br />
It is important to know if the whanau<br />
believes the illness to be a Maori<br />
illness (mate Maori). If this the case,<br />
a Tohunga probably will have already<br />
been consulted. Sensitivity is required<br />
when speaking <strong>of</strong> such <strong>issue</strong>s.<br />
However, once you have established<br />
the whanau view, you can clearly<br />
explain your view as a Western clinician.<br />
Mate Maori and a functional<br />
psychosis may co-exist. Importantly<br />
they can be treated together safely<br />
and successfully.<br />
(c) support and safety—Matiu<br />
has<br />
support from his whanau. When<br />
Maori present to the consultation<br />
alone they should be asked if they<br />
would like to have another Maori<br />
present at the interview. Whanau<br />
and cultural consultants not only<br />
support the patient, but also can<br />
help the clinician and the patient<br />
understand each other. In Matiu’s<br />
case, the presence <strong>of</strong> kaumatua<br />
and kuia who performed karakia at<br />
the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
interview ensured that everyone<br />
involved was kept spiritually safe in a<br />
culturally sanctioned manner. Safety<br />
is <strong>of</strong> paramount importance. If the<br />
whanau feel the patient is not safe<br />
then mutually agreed steps have to<br />
be taken to ensure their safety. This<br />
may involve invoking the Mental<br />
Health Act. Matiu is experiencing<br />
command hallucinations telling<br />
him to kill himself. No one in such<br />
circumstances can be assumed to<br />
be safe with respect to themselves<br />
or others. <strong>The</strong> clinician may have<br />
to explain this to the patient and<br />
whanau.<br />
(d) <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> culture (<strong>of</strong> patient and<br />
clinician) on the encounter between<br />
the physician and the patient: In<br />
order to establish a relationship with<br />
another person, Maori need to ‘get to<br />
know’ the other person and be known<br />
by that person. It is important to<br />
know who the person is, where they<br />
come from and who their family is.<br />
Thus time needs to be set aside for<br />
the clinician, the patient and whanau/<br />
support person to get to know each<br />
other. This can be difficult, with<br />
increasing time pressure on all<br />
clinicians. However it can be the<br />
difference between a positive outcome<br />
and treatment failure. Clinicians<br />
should feel comfortable about what<br />
they reveal about themselves. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
no need to tell your life story. A ‘chat’<br />
before getting onto the presenting<br />
problem is helpful. It is important<br />
that the patient is given time to tell<br />
his story in his own way and time.<br />
(e) Language:<br />
Do not take it for granted<br />
that words and expressions in English<br />
mean the same thing for you and<br />
your patient. Ways to avoid such<br />
misunderstanding include:<br />
• Cultural consultant/interpreter<br />
at meetings;<br />
• Develop a therapeutic relationship<br />
in which the patient feels comfort-<br />
64 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
able asking what you mean, e.g.<br />
‘what does anxious mean?’<br />
Be a good listener;<br />
Always be respectful;<br />
Explain your understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
the problem and your management<br />
plan until sure patient<br />
and whanau understand.<br />
in summary<br />
‘Te whare e kitea, te kokonga ngakau e<br />
kore e kitea’ is a Maori proverb, which<br />
literally translated means that we can<br />
see the corners <strong>of</strong> a house, but the<br />
corners <strong>of</strong> the heart are not visible. Its<br />
metaphorical meaning is that things<br />
are not always as they seem at first<br />
glance. I hope this paper goes some<br />
way to illustrating the relevance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
active acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> culture and<br />
difference in the practice <strong>of</strong> psychiatry<br />
amongst Maori; <strong>of</strong> ways to avoid<br />
misunderstanding and misinterpretation<br />
and to achieve a positive outcome<br />
for the patient, the family and the<br />
clinician.<br />
References<br />
1. Durie M. ‘Mauri Ora’. Auckland: Oxford University<br />
Press; 2001.<br />
2. American Psychiatric Association. ‘Diagnostic<br />
and statistical Manual <strong>of</strong> Mental Disorders:<br />
Fourth Edition Text Revision.’ Washington DC:<br />
American Psychiatric Association; 2000.<br />
3. McKendrick J and Bennett P Te Ara (2006).<br />
Indigenous <strong>issue</strong>s in GP psychiatry. In: Blashki,<br />
Judd, Piterman, editors. <strong>General</strong> practice psychiatry.<br />
sydney: McGraw Hill Medical. p 72-85.<br />
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
st John’s wort<br />
(Hypericum perforatum)<br />
Dr Joanne Barnes, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Herbal Medicine, school <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />
PREPARATiONs: Extract <strong>of</strong> St John’s<br />
wort flowers or leaves is available in<br />
many forms, including capsules, tablets<br />
and tinctures, as well as topical preparations.<br />
Chopped or powdered forms <strong>of</strong><br />
the dried herb are also available.<br />
ACTiVE CONsTiTUENTs: Probably<br />
hypericin, hyperforin and/or flavonoid<br />
constituents.<br />
MAiN UsEs: Symptomatic relief in<br />
mild to moderately severe depression.<br />
EVidENCE fOR EffiCACy: Systematic<br />
review and meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> 30<br />
RCTs show that certain St John’s wort<br />
extracts are more effective than placebo<br />
(NNT=42) and as effective as certain<br />
conventional antidepressants (including<br />
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors<br />
(SSRIs).<br />
AdVERsE EffECTs: Adverse effects<br />
reported in clinical studies are typically<br />
mild and most commonly gastrointestinal<br />
symptoms.<br />
dRUg iNTERACTiONs: Extracts <strong>of</strong><br />
St John’s wort interacts with certain<br />
prescription medicines through inducing<br />
several cytochrome P450 drug metabolising<br />
enzymes, resulting in reduced<br />
plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> medicines<br />
metabolised by these enzymes, including<br />
certain anticonvulsants, ciclosporin,<br />
summary Message<br />
st John’s wort is about as effective as<br />
some conventional antidepressants<br />
(NNT=42) including certain ssRIs for<br />
treating mild to moderate depression<br />
and has a favourable adverse effect<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile, at least with short-term use.<br />
However, it interacts with several other<br />
medicines, including digoxin, theophylline,<br />
warfarin and oral contraceptives.<br />
As with all herbal medicines, different<br />
st John’s wort products differ in their<br />
pharmaceutical quality, and the implications<br />
<strong>of</strong> this for efficacy and safety<br />
should be considered.<br />
warfarin, digoxin, theophylline and oral<br />
contraceptives. <strong>The</strong>re is also a risk <strong>of</strong><br />
increased serotonergic effects where St<br />
John’s wort is taken concomitantly with<br />
triptans or SSRIs.<br />
Key references<br />
CHARMs & HARMs<br />
Barnes J, Anderson LA, Phillipson JD. Herbal medicines.<br />
3rd ed. London: Pharmaceutical<br />
Press; 2007.<br />
Linde K, Mulrow C, Berner M, et al. st John’s wort for<br />
depression. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />
Reviews, <strong>issue</strong> 2. Art. no. CD000448. Wiley<br />
Interscience; 2005.<br />
Izzo AA & Ernst E. Interactions between herbal medicines<br />
and prescribed drugs: a systematic review.<br />
Drugs 2001;15:2163–2175.<br />
Mills E, Montori VM, Wu P, et al. Interaction <strong>of</strong> st<br />
John’s wort with conventional drugs: systematic<br />
review <strong>of</strong> clinical trials. BMJ 2005;329:27–30.<br />
Herbal medicines are a popular health care choice, but few have been tested to<br />
contemporary standards. cHARMS & HARMS summarises the evidence for the<br />
potential benefits and possible harms <strong>of</strong> well-known herbal medicines.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 65
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
REsOURCE sUMMARY<br />
destination: Recovery<br />
Te Unga Ki Uta:Te Oranga<br />
future responses to mental distress and loss <strong>of</strong> well-being<br />
—a discussion paper from the Mental Health Advocacy Coalition<br />
Helen Rodenburg MBChB, FRNZCGP<br />
Ko te pae tawhiti whaia ki a tata—Seek your aspirations on the horizons<br />
This recent discussion paper is<br />
important for general practice and<br />
primary health care as it recognises<br />
the role we play in improving the<br />
mental health <strong>of</strong> our population:<br />
Easy access: Individuals and families know<br />
where to find independent information<br />
on the availability and quality <strong>of</strong> services.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are many doors into services—a lot<br />
<strong>of</strong> them open into primary health settings<br />
which act as the hubs <strong>of</strong> service delivery<br />
and referral. People are not denied access<br />
to help on the basis that their distress<br />
or loss <strong>of</strong> well-being are insufficiently<br />
severe; they are either provided for or immediately<br />
referred elsewhere.<br />
<strong>The</strong> paper provides challenges for all<br />
health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to change and improve<br />
the care we <strong>of</strong>fer and is part <strong>of</strong> an<br />
international movement in the provision<br />
<strong>of</strong> services. With the developments in<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> in primary mental health<br />
care it is important that we, as GPs, are<br />
aware <strong>of</strong> developments and able to take<br />
advantage <strong>of</strong> opportunities.<br />
‘When you’re trying to create things<br />
that are new, you have to be prepared to<br />
be on the edge <strong>of</strong> risk.’—Michael Eisner<br />
I have been the RNZCGP representative<br />
on the Coalition and appreciate the opportunity<br />
to contribute to improvement<br />
in mental health services, and for the<br />
support given to primary care. ‘Destination<br />
Recovery’ supports integrated<br />
collaborative approaches to service provision<br />
across both specialist clinical and<br />
support organisational boundaries, and<br />
the secondary-primary interface. Leadership<br />
is recognised as being important, as<br />
is support for change management.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong>re are risks and costs to a program<br />
<strong>of</strong> action. But they are far less than the<br />
long-range risks and costs <strong>of</strong> comfortable<br />
inaction.’—John F Kennedy<br />
Executive summary<br />
‘Vision is perhaps our greatest strength…<br />
it makes us peer into the future and lends<br />
shape to the unknown.’—Li Ka Shing<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mental Health Advocacy Coalition<br />
has a vision for society’s well-being.<br />
We believe everyone should experience<br />
not only good mental health, but the<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> being able to cope with life<br />
stressors and enjoy a productive working<br />
life and fulfilling relationships. We believe<br />
mental health services have a major<br />
role to play in bringing about well-being<br />
for all; but only if these services are<br />
transformed.<br />
Forces for transformation<br />
<strong>The</strong> rise in human rights awareness,<br />
self-determination, the consumer soci-<br />
ety, multiculturalism and the Maori renaissance<br />
have all impacted on the mental<br />
health arena. Deinstitutionalisation,<br />
awareness <strong>of</strong> the social determinants <strong>of</strong><br />
distress, and the service-user movement<br />
are all drivers for mental health service<br />
transformation. Expectations are also<br />
changing—people with mental distress<br />
want the same from life as everyone<br />
else. <strong>The</strong>re is already change at mental<br />
health policy level in many countries,<br />
including <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
in our vision:<br />
Values and people<br />
• Madness is a fully human experience.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> services is recovery.<br />
• Self-determination is the foundation<br />
<strong>of</strong> service delivery.<br />
Adopting these values changes the way<br />
people think. Everyone is encouraged to<br />
be informed, active and competent—this<br />
includes the workforce, people who use<br />
services, their families and the wider<br />
community.<br />
Services<br />
• Primary services are the most<br />
common point <strong>of</strong> access, and <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
service negotiation, navigation,<br />
drug and talking therapies<br />
and other forms <strong>of</strong> support.<br />
66 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
• Niche mental health services<br />
include acute, forensic, and early<br />
intervention services, and services<br />
for specific client groups.<br />
• Other sectors are structurally aligned<br />
and work closely with primary<br />
services and mental health services<br />
to promote well-being for all.<br />
• All agencies are accountable to<br />
powerful and well-resourced<br />
district leadership groups.<br />
Systems in our vision:<br />
• Policy is pr<strong>of</strong>oundly influenced by<br />
service users, families and those<br />
most affected by mental distress, and<br />
funding is planned and responsive.<br />
• Measures <strong>of</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> services<br />
are simple and focus on outcomes<br />
that are important to service users.<br />
• Coordinated service development,<br />
workforce development<br />
and research lead to adaptive,<br />
responsive services for all.<br />
An independent national agency<br />
monitors services and provides<br />
information on quality and advocacy<br />
for service users and whanau.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 67<br />
•<br />
<strong>The</strong> discussion paper is available at:<br />
http://www.mentalhealth.org.nz/file/down<br />
loads/pdf/Destination%20Recovery_FINAL<br />
_low%20res.pdf<br />
Effective communication strategies to enhance<br />
patient self-care<br />
Fiona Moir MBChB; Renske van den Brink MBChB, FRNZCGP; Richard Fox MBChB, FRNZCGP; Susan Hawken MBChB, FRNZCGP<br />
introduction<br />
Can primary care practitioners influence<br />
and improve patient self-care, simply by<br />
the way they communicate with their<br />
patients? If so, can this be done within<br />
the consultation, even when practitioners<br />
already feel constrained by lack <strong>of</strong> time? 1<br />
Currently in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> (NZ) there<br />
is significant morbidity and mortality<br />
associated with lifestyle-related disease,<br />
and constraints on health resources<br />
increasingly mean that patients need to<br />
be more responsible for their own health.<br />
After indicating the general context <strong>of</strong><br />
lifestyle-related illness, this paper will<br />
outline the different approaches available<br />
to primary care practitioners. <strong>The</strong> prin-<br />
CORREsPONdENCE TO:<br />
fiona Moir<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice and Primary<br />
Health Care, Faculty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medical and Health<br />
sciences, <strong>The</strong> University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Auckland, PB 92019,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
f.moir@auckland.ac.nz<br />
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
ciples <strong>of</strong> motivational interviewing, the<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> change model, the ‘catastrophe<br />
theory’ model, 2 and the essential elements<br />
<strong>of</strong> brief intervention in primary<br />
care settings will be outlined. This will<br />
be followed by practical examples on<br />
how to communicate with the patient<br />
in ways that will enhance behavioural<br />
change and self-care.<br />
Background<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are some concerning trends in the<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> lifestyle-related disease. <strong>The</strong><br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> obesity has more than<br />
doubled from 1982 to 2003, 3 and the<br />
future impact <strong>of</strong> the obesity epidemic<br />
on the NZ population and health system<br />
will be significant. 4 Smoking rates are no<br />
longer dropping. 3 Although the overall<br />
ischaemic heart disease mortality rate for<br />
2011–15 is predicted to decline, there is<br />
an expected actual increase in the mortality<br />
rate for Maori. 5 Disparities across a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> risk factors and health outcomes<br />
for Maori and Pacific peoples, compared<br />
to the total population, persist and are <strong>of</strong><br />
grave concern. 6 With effective lifestyle<br />
REsOURCE sUMMARY<br />
PRACTICAL POINTERs<br />
intervention targeting obesity, smoking,<br />
exercise, and alcohol use, such lifestylerelated<br />
conditions could be reduced.<br />
A NZ study identified patients with lifestyle<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s by using a short screening<br />
tool consisting <strong>of</strong> lifestyle and mental<br />
health risk factors. It was found to be acceptable<br />
to patients and not burdensome<br />
to practitioners. 7 It is well known that<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering patients information only does<br />
not necessarily effect behaviour change,<br />
so other approaches are needed. An<br />
intervention that is currently being trialled<br />
and evaluated 8 involves a ‘lifestyle<br />
script’ administered by primary care<br />
nurses and followed up with telephone<br />
counselling. Utilising programmes that<br />
are culturally appropriate is important<br />
to success. 9 Other studies have shown<br />
that although there is acceptability<br />
and recognition <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />
disease management programmes, there<br />
is still concern by practitioners about the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> time involved. 10<br />
Promoting patient self-care ideally is<br />
the responsibility <strong>of</strong> all members <strong>of</strong> the
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
PRACTICAL POINTERs<br />
multi-disciplinary team. For example, a<br />
current initiative to improve medication<br />
adherence involves pharmacists undertaking<br />
a ‘Medicine Use Review’ (MUR),<br />
and discussing all <strong>of</strong> the patient’s<br />
medications with them. Central to the<br />
MUR consultation is the way in which<br />
the pharmacist communicates with the<br />
patient, exploring their health beliefs<br />
and their illness perspective. An exploration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patient’s illness perspective<br />
involves finding out their ideas, concerns<br />
and expectations relating to their illness<br />
and medications. 11 Once this information<br />
has been gathered, the pharmacist and<br />
the patient use joint decision-making to<br />
agree on the next step. This is a good<br />
example <strong>of</strong> how communication can aid<br />
patient behaviour change.<br />
A variety <strong>of</strong> models have attempted to<br />
facilitate patient self-care in the context<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patient-centred interview, but one<br />
<strong>of</strong> their limitations in primary care is<br />
the amount <strong>of</strong> time they take to deliver.<br />
In this paper we briefly describe four <strong>of</strong><br />
these models, and then indicate stylistic<br />
elements within them, which may usefully<br />
be used within a time-constrained<br />
interview.<br />
Motivational interviewing<br />
Motivational interviewing is a directive<br />
client-centered style <strong>of</strong> counselling<br />
for eliciting behaviour change. It has<br />
its roots in the drug and alcohol field,<br />
and has been used for many years in<br />
addictions counselling, predominantly<br />
focusing on problem drinking. Although<br />
initially developed for longer consultations,<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> it have been adapted<br />
for use in shorter interactions in many<br />
other areas <strong>of</strong> health behaviour change. 12<br />
<strong>The</strong> underlying ethos or spirit <strong>of</strong> motivational<br />
interviewing is that the practitioner–patient<br />
relationship works best as a<br />
partnership, that the quality <strong>of</strong> that relationship<br />
is the key to behaviour change,<br />
and that the motivation and ideas about<br />
change come from the patient, not from<br />
the practitioner. For example, the patient<br />
can be asked to identify and explore any<br />
ambivalence they have to the particular<br />
behaviour, e.g. ‘what are the good<br />
things and the not so good things about<br />
smoking?’ In motivational interviewing,<br />
it is the practitioner’s job to direct the<br />
patient towards exploring and discussing<br />
ambivalence and to summarise this<br />
for them, and it is the patient’s job to<br />
examine the ambivalence and to decide<br />
on the next step.<br />
<strong>The</strong> main aspects <strong>of</strong> motivational interviewing<br />
13 are summarised in Table 1.<br />
<strong>The</strong> stages <strong>of</strong> change<br />
Another model, referred to as ‘the stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> change’, played a vital role in the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> both motivational interviewing<br />
and brief intervention. 15 Central<br />
to this model is the idea that behaviour<br />
change is incremental and involves specific<br />
tasks. <strong>The</strong> model describes a series<br />
<strong>of</strong> changes progressing from pre-contemplative<br />
(unaware, unable or unwilling to<br />
change), to contemplative (evaluating pros<br />
and cons <strong>of</strong> change), to preparation, then<br />
action and maintenance. <strong>The</strong> model recognises<br />
that relapse is common, and that<br />
many people will have several attempts<br />
before achieving a successful outcome.<br />
Table 1<br />
Motivational interviewing 14<br />
spirit Autonomy<br />
collaboration<br />
Evocation<br />
Principles Roll with resistance and<br />
Counselling<br />
skills required<br />
avoid arguments<br />
Express empathy<br />
Develop discrepancy<br />
Support Self-efficacy<br />
open questions<br />
Affirm<br />
Reflect<br />
Summarise<br />
Catastrophe theory model<br />
Critics <strong>of</strong> the stages <strong>of</strong> change model<br />
state that the boundaries between the<br />
stages are arbitrary, and furthermore that<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten behaviour change does not actually<br />
involve any planning or preparation. 16 In<br />
a recent study, almost half <strong>of</strong> smokers’<br />
attempts to stop involved no previous<br />
planning, and unplanned attempts to<br />
stop were more likely to be successful. 2<br />
A new model in 2006, based on ‘catastrophe<br />
theory’, hypothesizes that behaviour<br />
change is influenced by ‘motivational<br />
tension’ (the levels <strong>of</strong> which depend on<br />
beliefs, past experiences, and the current<br />
situation), and that in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
this tension, even a small trigger can<br />
lead to a sudden change. 2<br />
Brief intervention<br />
<strong>The</strong> stages <strong>of</strong> change can be a helpful<br />
model to use alongside motivational<br />
interviewing, but where does brief<br />
intervention come into play? Brief<br />
interventions are those practices that<br />
aim to identify a problem and motivate<br />
an individual to do something about it,<br />
which can <strong>of</strong>ten be used in the course<br />
<strong>of</strong> routine practice without requiring<br />
significantly more time. 17 Multiple trials<br />
have shown the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> brief<br />
intervention. 18 Successful brief interventions<br />
have been found to contain six key<br />
elements in common. 19<br />
Brief intervention: FRAMES 20<br />
Feedback given about impairment/current<br />
risks, e.g. giving test results<br />
Responsibility is the patient’s<br />
Advice about change<br />
Menu <strong>of</strong> options—alternative strategies<br />
Empathy<br />
Self-efficacy and optimism for change<br />
A brief (five to 10 minute) smoking<br />
intervention has been developed based<br />
on motivational interviewing, assessing<br />
the patient’s confidence and their level<br />
68 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
<strong>of</strong> motivation. 12 A patient was ‘ready<br />
to change’ if they had a high level <strong>of</strong><br />
confidence and felt that the change was<br />
important to them.<br />
integrating the models<br />
in practice<br />
By calling on our experience, we have<br />
identified ways in which elements <strong>of</strong><br />
each <strong>of</strong> these models can be used in dayto-day<br />
practice.<br />
First, it is important to bring up the topic<br />
<strong>of</strong> possible health behaviour change<br />
carefully, especially if we are introducing<br />
the idea opportunistically. A good<br />
transition into this is to ask permission<br />
to discuss the topic: ‘Could we talk<br />
about smoking for a couple <strong>of</strong> minutes?’<br />
This approach avoids an abrupt change<br />
the rapport by using reflection, state<br />
our concern about the health behaviour<br />
and its implications, and leave the<br />
door open for future discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
behaviour should the patient wish to<br />
pursue this. Some argue that we can also<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer an intervention at this stage if it<br />
is appropriate. 16 However, enthusiastic<br />
suggestions by the doctor to think about<br />
behaviour change, or an <strong>of</strong>fer to try a<br />
new treatment, can sometimes come<br />
at the expense <strong>of</strong> connection with the<br />
patient. For this reason it is important<br />
to be very aware <strong>of</strong> the patient’s verbal<br />
and non-verbal reaction throughout the<br />
discussion and to respond to this appropriately<br />
for individual situations.<br />
If the patient is contemplative, we can<br />
encourage them to explore the pros and<br />
cons <strong>of</strong> the behaviour, whilst we reflect<br />
When styles and strategies from motivational<br />
interviewing are employed with skill, it begins to feel<br />
like a dance instead <strong>of</strong> a struggle<br />
into a potentially sensitive area for the<br />
patient. As emphasised in the FRAMES<br />
model, the timing <strong>of</strong> this can be important.<br />
For instance, giving a patient their<br />
abnormal liver function test results may<br />
provide an opportunity to introduce the<br />
topic <strong>of</strong> alcohol consumption.<br />
Next we can assess the patient’s ‘readiness<br />
to change’. This is best done with<br />
an open question: ‘What are your<br />
thoughts about smoking?’ In this way,<br />
we avoid making assumptions about<br />
what the patient thinks or ‘should’ be<br />
thinking.<br />
<strong>The</strong> next step can be dictated by where<br />
the patient is in the stages <strong>of</strong> change.<br />
Using a motivational interviewing style<br />
in our discussion for all <strong>of</strong> the stages <strong>of</strong><br />
change can be beneficial. If the patient<br />
is precontemplative, we can maintain<br />
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
their ambivalence or discrepancy about<br />
their current behaviour and their goals.<br />
We want the patient to take responsibility,<br />
and to come up with the motivation<br />
and ideas about change, whilst we listen<br />
and summarise. <strong>The</strong> practitioner and the<br />
patient can also work together in the<br />
preparation, action and maintenance<br />
stages. <strong>The</strong> practitioner can enable the<br />
patient to work out a personal action<br />
plan, anticipate barriers and triggers, and<br />
to identify supports and enablers. A<br />
vital part <strong>of</strong> the practitioner’s role is to<br />
increase self-efficacy and reinforce any<br />
accomplishments. In relapse, we must<br />
empathise and normalise the reality <strong>of</strong><br />
relapse, whilst not assuming the<br />
patient’s next step.<br />
Brief intervention can be useful with<br />
someone who is in the action or preparation<br />
stage, as we will be exploring a list<br />
PRACTICAL POINTERs<br />
<strong>of</strong> possible options <strong>of</strong> behaviour change<br />
they could pursue—some <strong>of</strong> which have<br />
been suggested by the doctor, and some<br />
by the patient. <strong>The</strong> recent model based<br />
on ‘catastrophe’ theory 2 illustrates that<br />
many patients’ attempts to stop will not<br />
involve planning, and that immediate<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> treatment is important to<br />
support those attempts.<br />
When time is short, the main idea is to<br />
use the underlying spirit <strong>of</strong> motivational<br />
interviewing, 11 and to remember that<br />
the practitioner–patient relationship and<br />
interaction is the vital component <strong>of</strong> the<br />
success <strong>of</strong> health behaviour change.<br />
Practitioner–patient<br />
relationship<br />
Judgement, lecturing and advice giving<br />
has been shown to be less effective in<br />
health behaviour change than genuine<br />
empathic use <strong>of</strong> motivational interviewing<br />
styles and strategies. Empathy is a<br />
powerful relational skill which helps<br />
patients to feel connected with their<br />
practitioner even when there is mutual<br />
disagreement over <strong>issue</strong>s such as smoking<br />
or medication compliance. 21<br />
<strong>The</strong> capacity to influence patients hinges<br />
upon the quality <strong>of</strong> rapport between<br />
practitioner and patient, and rapport is<br />
perceived by the patient as the ability <strong>of</strong><br />
the practitioner to relate to the patient’s<br />
world. 22<br />
Empathy is fairly easy to master when<br />
we agree with the patient and we can<br />
relate to their culture, their social status<br />
and their world view. However, when we<br />
disagree or disapprove <strong>of</strong> our patients,<br />
empathy is much more difficult. How<br />
can we be empathic when we know that<br />
the patient’s smoking is making their<br />
chest disease worse, and all we want to<br />
do is to tell them to stop? Firstly we can<br />
remind ourselves that the way in which<br />
we communicate can have an impact on<br />
the likelihood <strong>of</strong> the patient changing<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 69
CONTiNUiNg PROfEssiONAL dEVELOPMENT<br />
PRACTICAL POINTERs<br />
their behaviour. A useful technique to<br />
use when we notice ourselves feeling<br />
disapproving or annoyed by our patients<br />
is to try to ‘park’ that feeling and to first<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer the patient an empathic reflection.<br />
Contrast the difference in these two responses<br />
to a patient bothered by lithium<br />
side effects:<br />
Practitioner A: How about trying to split<br />
the dose, as well as having it with food?<br />
That should help cut down the nausea.<br />
Practitioner B: It sounds like the nausea<br />
is really awful for you and taking the<br />
lithium regularly is the last thing you<br />
feel like doing.<br />
Practitioner A has got their own agenda<br />
in the foreground, and the patient is likely<br />
to feel isolated and perhaps even irritated.<br />
Practitioner B however is putting<br />
the patient’s concern at centre stage. This<br />
is not the same as approving <strong>of</strong> their<br />
behaviour. It just demonstrates to the<br />
patient that Practitioner B understands<br />
them in a non-judgemental way. After<br />
that, once the rapport is more strongly<br />
established, Practitioner B can go on to<br />
let them know their medical concerns.<br />
When styles and strategies from motivational<br />
interviewing are employed<br />
with skill, it begins to feel like a dance<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> a struggle. Rather than trying<br />
to convince the patient to change, the<br />
practitioner uses a Socratic questioning<br />
style to evoke the patient’s own problemsolving<br />
skills and to galvanise them into<br />
action. <strong>The</strong> patient is doing all the work,<br />
and the practitioner’s genuine non-judgemental<br />
reflective style steadily builds<br />
rapport. If it feels more like a struggle<br />
then usually this is because the practitioner<br />
is working very hard to convince<br />
the patient to change, resulting in either<br />
a confrontation or the patient ceasing to<br />
play an active part in the process.<br />
Compare the following interventions for<br />
someone who needs more exercise:<br />
Practitioner A: How about trying to get<br />
<strong>of</strong>f the bus two stops early so that you<br />
can get in a bit <strong>of</strong> exercise that way?<br />
Practitioner B: If you were to find a way<br />
to increase your exercise even a little bit,<br />
what would you choose to try?<br />
Working in a motivational interviewing<br />
style challenges the practitioner to initially<br />
hold back their own opinions and<br />
advice, giving priority to the patient’s<br />
ideas and reflection <strong>of</strong> the patient’s illness<br />
experience, in order to strengthen<br />
the therapeutic relationship. Once this<br />
is established, the strong therapeutic<br />
relationship can then withstand the<br />
challenge <strong>of</strong> the practitioner’s medical<br />
opinion, even when this is in direct<br />
conflict with the patient’s view.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Lifestyle-related disease is <strong>of</strong> significant<br />
concern in NZ, and there is a need to raise<br />
awareness <strong>of</strong> opportunities for intervention.<br />
Brief intervention, motivational<br />
interviewing, stages <strong>of</strong> change, and the<br />
‘catastrophe model’ are all useful frameworks<br />
for promoting behavioural change,<br />
and elements from all four may be<br />
adapted for use in primary care settings.<br />
In a short consultation the most important<br />
factor is the skilful use <strong>of</strong> empathy to<br />
strengthen rapport in the practitioner–patient<br />
relationship. Good rapport creates a<br />
platform from which the practitioner can<br />
enhance their capacity to influence health<br />
behaviour and optimise patient self-care.<br />
References<br />
1. Goodyear-smith F, Wearn A, Everts H, Huggard P,<br />
Halliwell J. Communication in practice: Auckland<br />
general practitioners reflect on communication<br />
events and identify training needs. N Z Fam Physician<br />
2006;33(1):30–38.<br />
2. West R, sohal T. ‘Catastrophic’ pathways to smoking<br />
cessation: findings from national survey. BMJ<br />
2006;332(7539):458–60.<br />
3. Metcalf P, scragg RK, schaaf D, Dyall L, Black<br />
P, Jackson R. Trends in major cardiovascular<br />
risk factors in Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>: 1982 to<br />
2002–2003. N Z Med J 2006;119(1245):U2308.<br />
4. Turley M, Tobias M, Paul s. Non-fatal disease<br />
burden associated with excess body mass index<br />
and waist circumference in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> adults.<br />
Aust N Z J Public Health 2006;30(3):231–7.<br />
5. Tobias M, sexton K, Mann s, sharpe N. How<br />
low can it go? Projecting ischaemic heart disease<br />
mortality in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> to 2015. N Z Med J<br />
2006;119(1232):U1932.<br />
6. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. A portrait <strong>of</strong> health: Key results<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 2006/7 <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Health survey. In:<br />
Wellington: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2008.<br />
7. Goodyear-smith F, Arroll B, sullivan s, Elley R,<br />
Docherty B, Janes R. Lifestyle screening: development<br />
<strong>of</strong> an acceptable multi-item general practice<br />
tool. N Z Med J 2004;117(1205):U1146.<br />
8. Rose sB, Lawton BA, Elley CR, Dowell AC,<br />
Fenton AJ. <strong>The</strong> ‘Women’s Lifestyle study’, 2-year<br />
randomized controlled trial <strong>of</strong> physical activity<br />
counselling in primary health care: rationale and<br />
study design. BMC Public Health 2007;7(147):166.<br />
9. McAuley KA, Murphy E, McLay RT, Chisholm A,<br />
story G, Mann JI, et al. Implementation <strong>of</strong> a successful<br />
lifestyle intervention programme for <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong> Maori to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> type 2 diabetes<br />
and cardiovascular disease. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr<br />
2003;12(4):423–6.<br />
10. Tracey J, Bramley D. <strong>The</strong> acceptability <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />
disease management programmes to patients,<br />
general practitioners and practice nurses. N Z Med<br />
J 2003;116(1169):U331.<br />
11. stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney<br />
IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered<br />
medicine. Transforming the clinical method. Thousand<br />
Oaks: sage Publications; 1995.<br />
12. Emmons KM, Rollnick s. Motivational interviewing<br />
in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations.<br />
Am J Prev Med 2001;20(1):68–74.<br />
13. Miller WR, Rollnick s. Motivational interviewing:<br />
Preparing people for change. 2nd ed. <strong>New</strong> York:<br />
Guilford Press; 2002.<br />
14. Miller W, Rollnick s. Motivational interviewing:<br />
preparing people to change addictive behaviour.<br />
<strong>New</strong> York: Guilford; 1991.<br />
15. DiClemente CC, Velasquez MM. Motivational<br />
interviewing and the stages <strong>of</strong> change. In: Miller<br />
WR, Rollnick s, editors. Motivational interviewing:<br />
Preparing people for change. <strong>New</strong> York: Guilford<br />
Press; 2002.<br />
16. West R. Time for a change: putting the Transtheoretical<br />
(stages <strong>of</strong> Change) Model to rest. Addiction<br />
2005;100(8):1036–9.<br />
17. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC. Brief intervention.<br />
For hazardous and harmful drinking. A manual<br />
for use in Primary care. In: 2nd ed: Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Mental Health and substance Dependence, World<br />
Health Organization; 2001.<br />
18. Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan Js. Brief interventions<br />
for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction<br />
1993;88(3):315–35.<br />
19. Miller WR, sanchez VC. Motivating young adults for<br />
treatment and lifestyle change. In: Howard G, editor.<br />
Issues in alcohol use and misuse by young adults.<br />
Notre Dame: University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame Press; 1993.<br />
20. Miller W, sanchez V. Motivating young adults for<br />
treatment and lifestyle change. In: Howard G, editor.<br />
Issues in alcohol use and misuse by young adults.<br />
Notre Dame: University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame Press; 1993.<br />
21. Halpern J. Empathy and patient-physician conflicts.<br />
J Gen Intern Med 2007;22(5):696–700.<br />
22. Yapko MD. Breaking the patterns <strong>of</strong> depression.<br />
<strong>New</strong> York: Doubleday; 1997.<br />
70 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Uncertainty, fear and whistling<br />
happy tunes<br />
Katherine Wallis MBChB, MBHL, FRNZCGP<br />
ABstRACt<br />
Uncertainty in medical practice is<br />
ineradicable, despite great scientific<br />
advances over the last century. Uncertainty<br />
provokes fear, not just in patients<br />
but also in doctors. Patients cope with<br />
their fear by seeking the advice and reassurance<br />
<strong>of</strong> doctors; doctors, on the other<br />
hand, cope by denial and self-deception.<br />
But today, in this scientific, truth-seeking<br />
age doctors are encouraged to share<br />
their uncertainty with patients in order<br />
to ‘empower’ patients and improve doctor–patient<br />
relations. While in theory<br />
doctors might agree with this approach,<br />
in practice they continue to deny it and<br />
instead whistle happy tunes—deceiving<br />
both themselves and their patients.<br />
A disclosure <strong>of</strong> uncertainty requires an<br />
acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> uncertainty and,<br />
in practice, the ability <strong>of</strong> doctors to acknowledge<br />
and to tolerate uncertainty<br />
is limited.<br />
Whenever I feel afraid, I hold my head<br />
erect<br />
And whistle a happy tune, So no one<br />
will suspect<br />
I’m afraid.<br />
While shivering in my shoes, I strike a<br />
careless pose<br />
And whistle a happy tune, And no one<br />
ever knows<br />
I’m afraid.<br />
<strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> this deception, Is very<br />
strange to tell<br />
For when I fool the people I fear, I fool<br />
myself as well! 1<br />
If one thing in this life is certain, it<br />
is that the practice <strong>of</strong> medicine is a<br />
practice in uncertainty. Renée Fox, 2 in<br />
her landmark studies <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in<br />
medical practice in the 1950s, characterised<br />
three types <strong>of</strong> uncertainty: the<br />
uncertainty <strong>of</strong> medical knowledge, the<br />
uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the practitioner, and the<br />
uncertainty in discerning between these<br />
two types <strong>of</strong> uncertainty (is the answer<br />
out there somewhere and I just haven’t<br />
come across it, or has the answer not<br />
been discovered yet?). In clinical practice<br />
we face uncertainty about the diagnosis,<br />
compounded by the inherent variability<br />
in how patients perceive and describe<br />
their problems; uncertainty about the<br />
treatment, as we know patients respond<br />
differently to treatments and that applying<br />
general knowledge to individuals<br />
is flawed; and uncertainty about the<br />
role that we are expected to play today:<br />
are we to be rational scientist, shaman,<br />
social worker or counsellor?<br />
Over the last century great advances<br />
in medical knowledge have been made,<br />
leading some enthusiasts to believe<br />
that uncertainty in medicine could<br />
be eradicated. It was hoped that,<br />
with enough research, all questions<br />
would be answered and that illness<br />
and suffering could be dealt with by<br />
EtHiCs<br />
a rational scientific approach, making<br />
intuition and spiritualism redundant.<br />
Such hopes, however, look increasingly<br />
unlikely ever to be fulfilled, in part<br />
because medicine, if it is a science at<br />
all, is a science <strong>of</strong> individuals. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
are no great generalisable truths to be<br />
discovered and applied; the expression<br />
and the experience <strong>of</strong> illness will<br />
always remain unique. Randomised<br />
controlled trials will never be able<br />
to tell us how a particular individual<br />
will respond to a particular treatment.<br />
As Kant once remarked, ‘Out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crooked timber <strong>of</strong> humanity no straight<br />
thing was ever made’. 3<br />
Uncertainty exists in all facets <strong>of</strong> life,<br />
but in the health care context in particular,<br />
uncertainty breeds anxiety and fear.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a Chinese proverb claiming that<br />
‘more people die <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> their illness<br />
than die <strong>of</strong> the illness itself’. As <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
as not it is fear, born <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, that<br />
prompts a patient to seek the opinion <strong>of</strong><br />
a doctor. Patients want to know whether<br />
their symptoms are significant, what<br />
can be done and, preferably, also to be<br />
reassured that all will be well. However,<br />
given that we must all die one day, there<br />
will come a day when all will not be<br />
well. It is the doctor’s role to sort out<br />
and communicate the known from the<br />
<strong>The</strong> ethics column explores <strong>issue</strong>s around practising ethically in primary health care<br />
and aims to encourage thoughtfulness about ethical dilemmas that we may face.<br />
tHis issUE: Our guest ethicist and GP Katherine Wallis discusses balancing the acknowledgment<br />
to patients that medical practice is uncertain with managing their fears<br />
and anxieties.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 71
EtHiCs<br />
unknown, and to manage the patient’s<br />
anxiety and fear.<br />
For the doctor’s part too, there is fear.<br />
From the confusing, inaccurate, or even<br />
contradictory information 4 presented<br />
we must sort the relevant from the<br />
irrelevant and establish a management<br />
plan. We can never be certain and yet<br />
still we must act, even if only to advise<br />
a ‘wait and see’ approach. And with<br />
action, <strong>of</strong> course, comes responsibility.<br />
We can be guided by probabilities,<br />
but individual differences reduce our<br />
ability to predict from generalities and<br />
there is the constant risk <strong>of</strong> error. Error<br />
is unavoidable, not only because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
limitations <strong>of</strong> medical knowledge and<br />
the limits <strong>of</strong> the human intellect, but<br />
also because <strong>of</strong> the ‘necessary fallibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> a knowledge <strong>of</strong> particulars’. 5 <strong>The</strong> fact<br />
that we must act before certainty can<br />
be established (if it ever can be) makes<br />
clinical medicine, not a rational science<br />
nor an art, but a ‘practice’. 6<br />
Elstein, who spent much <strong>of</strong> his life<br />
studying diagnostic decision-making, estimated<br />
that the rate <strong>of</strong> diagnostic error<br />
in medical practice was approximately<br />
15%. 7 This figure has subsequently been<br />
corroborated. 8 <strong>The</strong>se diagnostic errors,<br />
however, are only errors in hindsight:<br />
At the time the diagnosis was made it<br />
seemed the most likely, most reasonable<br />
and therefore the most correct diagnosis<br />
to make. As a doctor in Paget’s study<br />
remarked ‘…the errors are errors now,<br />
but they weren’t errors then’. 9<br />
Experienced practitioners use heuristics<br />
(rapid pattern recognition processes) 3 to<br />
reach a diagnosis. This intuitive decision-making<br />
process saves time and gives<br />
the correct diagnosis most <strong>of</strong> the time; 10<br />
however there is a price to pay for this<br />
efficiency: Predictable error. Sometimes<br />
the most likely diagnosis, rather than<br />
the correct diagnosis, is made. As James<br />
Reason says: ‘Our propensity for certain<br />
types <strong>of</strong> error is the price we pay for the<br />
brain’s remarkable ability to think and<br />
act intuitively.’ 11<br />
In hindsight the correct diagnosis is<br />
obvious, but in the complex, chaotic, and<br />
uncertain world <strong>of</strong> clinical practice the<br />
most likely diagnosis at the time seems<br />
the most reasonable one to make. Thus<br />
there is a trade <strong>of</strong>f between efficiency<br />
and accuracy.<br />
In such a mire <strong>of</strong> uncertainty and error,<br />
how can either doctor or patient make<br />
a rational decision about treatment,<br />
let alone continue to practise? To cope<br />
with the fear, doctors employ various<br />
strategies designed to reduce either the<br />
responsibility or the uncertainty. 12 Responsibility<br />
can be reduced by referral,<br />
healing to take place, a pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong><br />
certainty is required.<br />
Today, while doctors might accept<br />
(in theory) that medical knowledge is<br />
uncertain, in practice they continue<br />
to pr<strong>of</strong>ess certainty. In practice the art<br />
<strong>of</strong> self-deception is alive and well. In<br />
front <strong>of</strong> patients, doctors instinctively<br />
suppress and deny their knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainty 6,14 in favour <strong>of</strong> providing<br />
reassurance and hope. And, given the<br />
patient’s desire for reassurance, and the<br />
essential uncertainty <strong>of</strong> clinical practice,<br />
whistling such a happy tune might just<br />
be the pragmatic approach to take.<br />
Katz considers that the denial <strong>of</strong> uncertainty<br />
in medicine has something<br />
In hindsight the correct diagnosis is obvious, but in the<br />
complex, chaotic, and uncertain world <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
practice the most likely diagnosis at the time seems the<br />
most reasonable one to make. Thus there is a trade <strong>of</strong>f<br />
between efficiency and accuracy<br />
by deferring to guidelines and protocols,<br />
or by abandoning the patient in a misconstruing<br />
<strong>of</strong> patient-centred medicine.<br />
Uncertainty, on the other hand, can be<br />
reduced by specialisation (developing<br />
‘special interests’), or by an appeal to ‘in<br />
my clinical experience’ arguments; in<br />
other words, the long-favoured technique<br />
<strong>of</strong> denial and self-deception.<br />
Self-deception is not, <strong>of</strong> course, unique<br />
to doctors. Most drivers consider themselves<br />
‘better than average’ drivers and<br />
94% <strong>of</strong> college pr<strong>of</strong>essors rate themselves<br />
in the top half <strong>of</strong> their pr<strong>of</strong>ession. 13<br />
Nevertheless, in medicine there is a<br />
particularly long and entrenched tradition<br />
<strong>of</strong> self (and patient) deception. <strong>The</strong><br />
justification has been that, in order for<br />
to do with making sense in a complex<br />
and confusing world so that action<br />
is possible. <strong>The</strong>re are limits to living<br />
with uncertainty; the resultant fear can<br />
paralyse. In practice, given that we must<br />
act in uncertainty, 14 self-deception might<br />
just be essential.<br />
Today, however, doctors are encouraged<br />
to take a different approach. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />
encouraged to share their uncertainty<br />
with patients as a means to improving<br />
doctor–patient relations. 15 Disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainty, or truth-telling, is about<br />
empowerment, about setting patients<br />
free to decide and to act rationally according<br />
to their true nature. But does<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, the truth,<br />
really set patients free?<br />
72 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
<strong>The</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the classical Greek philosophers,<br />
shared by much, though perhaps<br />
not all, Christian theology, is that it<br />
does. ‘And ye shall know the truth, and<br />
the truth shall make you free.’ (Gospel<br />
according to St John, chapter 8, verse 32).<br />
Ancient Stoics and most modern rationalists<br />
are at one with Christian teaching on<br />
this <strong>issue</strong>. 3<br />
Telling the truth is ‘good’. Doctors<br />
believe this (in theory) and medical<br />
regulators promote it.<br />
And yet, for some reason, arguments<br />
against truth-telling in medical practice<br />
have persisted for centuries. In 1672,<br />
French physician, priest and philosopher<br />
Samuel de Sorbiere cautioned young doctors<br />
looking to establish themselves in<br />
practice ‘what not to say’:<br />
…in order to safeguard your interests,<br />
I must tell you that medicine is a very<br />
imperfect science, that it is quite full <strong>of</strong><br />
guesswork, that it scarcely understands its<br />
subject matter, nor is it familiar with the<br />
things employed to maintain it; that the<br />
more enlightened only feel their way in<br />
it groping amidst a thick gloom; and that<br />
after having considered seriously all the<br />
matters which may be useful, collected all<br />
one’s thoughts, examined all one’s experiences,<br />
it will indeed be a wise physician<br />
who can promise relief to a poor patient. 16<br />
Of course medical knowledge has<br />
progressed dramatically since 1672;<br />
nevertheless, the net amount <strong>of</strong> disease<br />
and suffering does not appear to have<br />
been reduced. 17 Much remains unknown<br />
about how best to ‘promise relief to a<br />
[particular] poor patient’. Thus critics <strong>of</strong><br />
the uncertainty-sharing doctrine persist,<br />
arguing that patients want to deceive<br />
themselves, and to be deceived about the<br />
deficiencies <strong>of</strong> medicine, and that, rather<br />
than improving doctor–patient relations,<br />
such disclosure actually damages the relationship<br />
reducing trust, confidence and<br />
patient satisfaction. 18 Questions remain,<br />
however, as to whether the noted deleterious<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> the disclosure <strong>of</strong> uncertainty<br />
is due to the way the uncertainty<br />
was disclosed or the uncertainty itself.<br />
Despite the scientific commitment to<br />
truth and the increased access to information<br />
today, healing is not a rational<br />
science. In practice, we can eliminate<br />
neither the uncertainty nor the fear;<br />
there will always be room for clinical<br />
judgment, for appeals to ‘in my experience…’<br />
arguments. It is possible that<br />
the knowledge <strong>of</strong> uncertainty might<br />
set patients free to choose, but it won’t<br />
set them free from fear. Nor will such<br />
knowledge set doctors free from fear and<br />
enable them to act. Perhaps the disclosure<br />
<strong>of</strong> uncertainty does interfere with<br />
our effectiveness as healers? Perhaps<br />
patients do still need to be set free from<br />
anxiety so that they can heal?<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem with the disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainty is that, not only might it<br />
kill <strong>of</strong>f our patients and our practice, but<br />
that it might also kill <strong>of</strong>f us. Doctors<br />
have some <strong>of</strong> the worst statistics when it<br />
comes to suicide, divorce and substance<br />
abuse. Perhaps we should be bolstering,<br />
rather than tearing down, the strategies<br />
developed over millennia to aid survival<br />
in practice? As that well-known physician<br />
Dr Hibbert, who chuckles rather<br />
than whistles, says: ‘Before I learned to<br />
chuckle mindlessly, I was headed to an<br />
early grave myself.’<br />
Hibbert: Lisa, I’m afraid your tummy<br />
ache may be caused by stress.<br />
Homer: Well, that’s a relief.<br />
Hibbert: Heh, yeah. Anyway, when it<br />
comes to stress, I believe laughter is the<br />
best medicine. You know, before I learned<br />
to chuckle mindlessly, I was headed for<br />
an early grave myself. (chuckles)<br />
Homer: Give it a try, honey. (Lisa tries<br />
to chuckle). 19<br />
References<br />
EtHiCs<br />
1. Rodgers R, Hammerstein O. Whistle a happy tune.<br />
Lyrics from <strong>The</strong> King And I Musical; 1951.<br />
2. Fox R. Experiment Perilous: physicians and patients<br />
facing the unknown. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press;<br />
1959.<br />
3. Berlin I. Two concepts <strong>of</strong> liberty. In: Hardy H,<br />
editor. Liberty: Isaiah Berlin. <strong>New</strong> York: Oxford<br />
University Press; 2002. p 166–217.<br />
4. Graber M, Gordon R, Franklin N. Reducing diagnostic<br />
errors in medicine: what’s the goal? Acad<br />
Med 2002; 77(10):981–92.<br />
5. Gorovitz S, MacIntyre A. Toward a theory <strong>of</strong> medical<br />
fallibility. Hastings Cent Rep 1975; 5(6):13–23.<br />
6. Montgomery K. How doctors think: Clinical<br />
judgment and the practice <strong>of</strong> medicine. <strong>New</strong> York:<br />
Oxford University Press; 2006.<br />
7. Elstein AS. Clinical reasoning in medicine. In:<br />
Higgs J, Jones MA, editors. Clinical Reasoning<br />
in the Health Pr<strong>of</strong>essions. Woburn, Mass:<br />
Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995. p 49–59.<br />
8. Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause<br />
<strong>of</strong> diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med 2008;<br />
121(5 Suppl):S2–23.<br />
9. Paget M. <strong>The</strong> Unity <strong>of</strong> Mistakes: a phenomenological<br />
interpretation <strong>of</strong> medical work. Philadelphia:<br />
Temple University Press; 1988.<br />
10. Elstein AS. Heuristics and biases: selected errors<br />
in clinical reasoning. Acad Med 1999;74(7):791–4.<br />
11. Reason J. Human Error: Cambridge University<br />
Press; 1990.<br />
12. Dowrick C, Frith L, editors. <strong>General</strong> practice and<br />
ethics: Uncertainty and responsibility. London:<br />
Routledge; 1999.<br />
13. Mele AR. Real self-deception. Behav Brain Sci<br />
1997; 20(1):91–102; discussion 3–36.<br />
14. Katz J. Why doctors don’t disclose uncertainty.<br />
Hastings Cent Rep 1984;14(1):35–44.<br />
15. Henry MS. Uncertainty, responsibility, and the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> the physician/patient relationship. J<br />
Med Ethics 2006;32(6):321–3.<br />
16. Katz J. <strong>The</strong> silent world <strong>of</strong> doctor and patient. <strong>New</strong><br />
York: <strong>The</strong> Free Press; 1984.<br />
17. Lantos J. Do we still need doctors? <strong>New</strong> York:<br />
Routledge; 1997.<br />
18. Johnson CG, Levenkron JC, Suchman AL,<br />
Manchester R. Does physician uncertainty affect<br />
patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med 1988;<br />
3(2):144–9.<br />
19. Scully B. Make room for Lisa: <strong>The</strong> Simpsons.<br />
Episode 219; 1999.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 73
EssAYs<br />
sub-threshold mental health syndromes:<br />
Finding an alternative to the medication <strong>of</strong> unhappiness<br />
Fiona Mathieson MA(Applied), DipTchg; sunny collings MBChB, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, DPH, PhD; Anthony Dowell MBChB, FRNZCGP<br />
ABstRACt<br />
Sub-threshold anxiety and depression<br />
are common presentations in primary<br />
care. <strong>The</strong>y carry a significant disability<br />
burden along with the risk <strong>of</strong> developing<br />
a frank disorder. Intervention<br />
options are limited, although there is<br />
some evidence that ultra brief interventions<br />
may be effective with this<br />
patient group. We argue that there is<br />
a need for a systematic but ultra brief,<br />
minimal contact intervention, that can<br />
be delivered by GPs or practice nurses.<br />
Such an intervention would be a form <strong>of</strong><br />
facilitated self-management, a step up<br />
from self-help, from which people could<br />
be referred on to more intensive treatment<br />
or medication if required.<br />
MesH keywords: Primary health<br />
care, mental health, psychotherapy,<br />
mental disorders<br />
CORREsPONDENCE tO:<br />
sunny Collings<br />
Director Social Psychiatry<br />
& Population Mental<br />
Health Research Unit,<br />
Otago University<br />
Wellington, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
sunny.collings@<br />
otago.ac.nz<br />
introduction<br />
Just over one quarter (26.5%) <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
care patients in NZ and overseas 1,2 are<br />
considered by GPs to have sub-threshold<br />
mental health syndromes. <strong>The</strong>se are<br />
combinations <strong>of</strong> signs and symptoms<br />
that do not meet the threshold for<br />
disorder in standard diagnostic systems<br />
such as DSM-IV. 3 Unlike secondary<br />
mental health service populations, the<br />
primary care mental health population<br />
includes people with a broad spectrum<br />
<strong>of</strong> undifferentiated syndromes ranging<br />
from few, mild or transient symptoms to<br />
symptom combinations and severity that<br />
meet diagnostic criteria. Often these<br />
arise in the context <strong>of</strong> social problems<br />
such as family or economic stress. In<br />
a NZ primary care sample, functional<br />
impairment was found not to differ<br />
significantly between diagnosed disorder<br />
and sub-threshold syndromes. 7 Furthermore,<br />
a subset <strong>of</strong> those with sub-threshold<br />
syndromes are at increased risk for<br />
development <strong>of</strong> clinical depression 4 or<br />
eventual suicide. 5 Sub-threshold mental<br />
health syndromes therefore represent<br />
an important morbidity and disability<br />
burden to the community, 6 in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
work and role impairment as well as<br />
distress. 7,8 It has been suggested that<br />
intervention may be warranted for up to<br />
80% <strong>of</strong> those affected. 9,10<br />
Despite the extent <strong>of</strong> morbidity burden,<br />
in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> only 22% <strong>of</strong> these people<br />
receive an intervention <strong>of</strong> any kind,<br />
most commonly supportive discussion<br />
and non-specific counselling. 10 Access to<br />
interventions for sub-threshold syndromes<br />
is likely to be even less equitably<br />
distributed than access to treatment<br />
for diagnosed disorders. <strong>The</strong> evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health–funded NZ<br />
demonstration projects for primary care<br />
services for common mental disorders<br />
and sub-threshold syndromes shows a<br />
high degree <strong>of</strong> perceived unmet need<br />
for treatment and substantial variability<br />
in what is <strong>of</strong>fered for sub-threshold<br />
syndromes. 11<br />
Given this information, the key questions<br />
are, firstly, should people with<br />
such syndromes receive an intervention<br />
and, secondly, if so, what should the<br />
intervention be? <strong>The</strong>se questions can be<br />
answered by considering the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
contemporary primary care practice, the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> interventions, the existing<br />
evidence about interventions, the policy<br />
context, and primary care sector workforce<br />
development.<br />
Nature <strong>of</strong> primary care practice<br />
GPs face a number <strong>of</strong> challenges in the<br />
management <strong>of</strong> sub-threshold syndromes:<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary care environment<br />
is complex and chaotic, with dynamic<br />
treatment plans that change to meet the<br />
changing need <strong>of</strong> the patient, competing<br />
illness priorities and difficult socioeconomic<br />
problems. <strong>The</strong> current classification<br />
<strong>of</strong> psychiatric illness does not apply<br />
well to undifferentiated psychosocial<br />
problems in primary care. Sub-threshold<br />
syndromes do not always conform to the<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> less severe forms <strong>of</strong> DSM-<br />
IV defined entities. 7,12–15 In practice, GPs<br />
tend to make pragmatic management<br />
decisions based as much on functioning<br />
74 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
as on whether or not syndromes exceed a<br />
diagnostic threshold. 16,17 In this context,<br />
management <strong>of</strong> sub-threshold syndromes<br />
is inevitable, as GPs are balancing a<br />
focused and pragmatic response to competing<br />
presenting problems. 18 Common<br />
non-specific GP management strategies<br />
include giving advice and/or reassurance,<br />
sometimes in extended consultations. 19<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> interventions<br />
Other options for sub-threshold mental<br />
health syndromes are limited. Secondary<br />
care services are not appropriate for<br />
this group, even if they were available<br />
and patients wished to use them. GPs<br />
can refer patients for generic counselling<br />
or specific psychotherapies but,<br />
despite recent policy initiatives, 20 cost<br />
may still be an important barrier. <strong>The</strong><br />
need for referral out <strong>of</strong> the practice is a<br />
barrier for both patients (due to waiting<br />
and uncertainty about eligibility for<br />
treatment) and some practitioners (due<br />
to administration and supply <strong>of</strong> trusted<br />
providers to refer to). 11,17,20 Furthermore,<br />
the notion <strong>of</strong> on-referral to a ‘specialist’<br />
or ‘expert’ is a secondary care model<br />
which may not be appropriate for the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> these problems. <strong>The</strong> Internet<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers the possibility <strong>of</strong> direct patient<br />
access to self-management information.<br />
<strong>The</strong> HRC has funded a clinical trial <strong>of</strong><br />
Internet treatment for clinical depression<br />
(RID, i PI Dr S Nada-Raja, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Otago), which is also available to those<br />
with sub-threshold syndromes.<br />
Evidence for interventions<br />
Treatments used in primary care RCTs<br />
are commonly described generically<br />
using terms such as ‘counselling’, 21 and<br />
they are being conducted with varied<br />
clinical groups (e.g. sub-threshold<br />
depression, 22 major depression, or sub-<br />
i http://www.otago.ac.nz/rid/<br />
threshold syndromes, 23 meaning trials<br />
cannot be readily compared or replicated.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is some limited evidence supporting<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> ultra brief interventions<br />
for sub-threshold depression in primary<br />
care, using cognitive behavioural and<br />
interpersonal–dynamic principles 24 and<br />
interpersonal psychotherapy. 25 A smaller<br />
evidence base is developing in relation to<br />
self-help for sub-threshold syndromes. 8<br />
<strong>The</strong> evidence to date indicates that the<br />
treatments best supported by evidence<br />
include exercise and relaxation training,<br />
bibliotherapy based on CBT 26,27 and webbased<br />
psycho-education. 26<br />
Many brief treatments, including selfhelp,<br />
appear to be condensed versions <strong>of</strong><br />
interventions developed to treat discrete<br />
disorders over many months. 28 Some <strong>of</strong><br />
these interventions may be too densely<br />
packed with therapeutic elements to<br />
actually be feasible over a short period.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Primary Care Initiatives Evaluation<br />
therapist survey revealed that counsellors<br />
and therapists generally considered<br />
that six sessions were too few. 20<br />
While severity <strong>of</strong> the conditions being<br />
treated may explain some <strong>of</strong> this, several<br />
therapists also described difficulties in<br />
choosing the ‘right’ approach in such<br />
a short space <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong> underlying<br />
assumption that the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
psychopathology is the same as for full<br />
(especially severe) disorders may be<br />
flawed, 29,30 and this may partly explain<br />
the smaller effect sizes commonly seen<br />
for more established treatments such as<br />
CBT in primary care settings, although<br />
lower distress at baseline and the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘usual GP care’ may also<br />
contribute. 21 In their seminal review<br />
<strong>of</strong> psychotherapy research, leading UK<br />
psychotherapists Roth and Fonagy called<br />
for further development work on the<br />
management <strong>of</strong> sub-threshold syndromes<br />
in primary care. 28<br />
Policy context<br />
EssAYs<br />
<strong>The</strong> Primary Health Care Strategy 31<br />
prompted a new direction for NZ<br />
primary health care, within an overarching<br />
public health framework. <strong>The</strong><br />
vehicle for achieving the changes was<br />
Primary Health Organisations (PHOs),<br />
which have evolved from a range <strong>of</strong><br />
other provider entities, resulting in<br />
diversity in philosophical approaches,<br />
capacities and rates <strong>of</strong> development, and<br />
different expectations with respect to<br />
infrastructure and workforce. 20 <strong>The</strong>se<br />
structures and the revision <strong>of</strong> funding<br />
mechanisms made it possible for mental<br />
health services to be developed as an<br />
integral part <strong>of</strong> PHOs and these are<br />
now embedded as a core part <strong>of</strong> funded<br />
primary care activity. <strong>The</strong> expectation<br />
is that primary care will manage<br />
mental disorders <strong>of</strong> ‘mild’ to ‘moderate’<br />
severity and also be proactive in mental<br />
health promotion (with a possible hope<br />
that this will reduce incident cases <strong>of</strong><br />
frank disorder). Clearly in this policy<br />
context there is an intention to address<br />
sub-threshold syndromes given their<br />
position in this spectrum.<br />
Primary care sector<br />
workforce development<br />
<strong>The</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Primary Mental<br />
Health Initiatives showed that there<br />
was great diversity among clinicians<br />
providing psychological interventions,<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional and theoretical<br />
backgrounds. <strong>The</strong>re will need to be<br />
considerable primary mental health<br />
workforce expansion and skill enhancement<br />
in order to meet the extent <strong>of</strong><br />
unmet need. Existing staff working in<br />
this area have particularly emphasised<br />
the need for skill development in brief<br />
interventions. 20 Substantial work will<br />
be required in relation to this, as most<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 75
EssAYs<br />
training for psychological treatments is<br />
time-consuming, whether it is delivered<br />
intensively or intermittently.<br />
should people with subthreshold<br />
mental health<br />
syndromes receive<br />
intervention and, if so, what?<br />
We suggest that the evidence supports<br />
intervention on the grounds <strong>of</strong> relief<br />
<strong>of</strong> suffering and the restoration <strong>of</strong><br />
functioning. However, the over-riding<br />
argument is that the nature <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
care practice means that people with<br />
these syndromes are already receiving<br />
interventions <strong>of</strong> various kinds. On the<br />
whole these are likely to be pragmatic<br />
approaches to common and complex<br />
presentations, <strong>of</strong> the kind that GPs<br />
have been delivering for many decades,<br />
variably infused with evidence as it<br />
comes to hand. In light <strong>of</strong> this, and the<br />
need to be thoughtful about the use <strong>of</strong><br />
scarce health resources, the focus needs<br />
to be on the most effective way <strong>of</strong><br />
delivering this care.<br />
A useful framework for considering<br />
the problem <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
for mental health problems in the face<br />
<strong>of</strong> scarce resources is that proposed by<br />
Jorm. 26 <strong>The</strong> model suggests that a range<br />
<strong>of</strong> responses is available for subpopulations<br />
with varying levels <strong>of</strong> symptoms<br />
and impairment. As symptoms and<br />
impairment increase from a low base<br />
due to stresses in everyday life, 32,33 so<br />
the interventions called into play move<br />
from the first ‘wave’ <strong>of</strong> self-help using<br />
everyday strategies such as exercise<br />
and talking to family or friends,<br />
through a second ‘wave’ <strong>of</strong> facilitated<br />
self-help. <strong>The</strong> next ‘wave’ is pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
help-seeking, with, finally,<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> specific treatments once<br />
severity is at the disorder threshold.<br />
This approach is consistent with the<br />
‘stepped care’ model now commonly<br />
accepted as a structure for funding<br />
mental health services.<br />
In this framework, presentation or<br />
detection in primary care represents<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the first wave <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
help-seeking. Primary care practitioners<br />
need a range <strong>of</strong> management options<br />
to call on at this level, and there have<br />
been calls for investment in research to<br />
establish whether the use <strong>of</strong> ‘minimal’<br />
interventions are an efficient method <strong>of</strong><br />
delivering psychological treatments. 34<br />
We have been fortunate to receive<br />
Health Research Council funding to<br />
develop an ultra-brief intervention that<br />
can be delivered by a trained but nonmental<br />
health–specialist primary care<br />
practitioner (e.g. practice nurse or GP).<br />
This will involve a pragmatic two–three<br />
contact intervention to reduce the disability<br />
associated with sub-threshold<br />
mental health syndromes, as a step up<br />
from self help in the ‘wave’ framework.<br />
<strong>The</strong> intervention will require minimal<br />
additional training; and we hope it will<br />
reduce the need for referral on, thus<br />
maintaining patient links with the<br />
primary care team; and will reinforce<br />
the patient’s existing self-help strategies,<br />
consistent with the strengths-based<br />
approaches now being emphasised in NZ<br />
mental health practice. Following development<br />
we hope to take the intervention<br />
to pragmatic clinical trial in the NZ<br />
primary care setting.<br />
Novel intervention research such as this<br />
is central to meeting demand in primary<br />
care mental health in NZ and it will<br />
contribute to the national and international<br />
evidence base for the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> this common and burdensome<br />
problem. We acknowledge that secondary<br />
care mental health clinicians may be<br />
doubtful about the idea <strong>of</strong> an ultra brief<br />
intervention that can be used by people<br />
with a minimum <strong>of</strong> training: ‘Where are<br />
the formulations? <strong>The</strong> risk assessments?<br />
<strong>The</strong> highly trained mental health clinicians?’<br />
However, current mental health<br />
funding policy in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> provides<br />
access to sophisticated, expensive treatment,<br />
which is in relatively short supply,<br />
and is aimed at diagnosable disorders.<br />
Most primary care patients cannot<br />
jump this high threshold for access to<br />
services, and this is probably appropriate.<br />
However, below this threshold there a<br />
large group <strong>of</strong> people with, at best, (and<br />
only recently) partly-met need. We aim<br />
to help meet this need.<br />
References<br />
1. <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe research group. <strong>The</strong> nature and<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> psychological problems in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong> primary health care: a report on Mental<br />
Health and <strong>General</strong> Practice Investigation. NZMJ<br />
2003;116(1171):1–15.<br />
2. Ustun T, Sartorius N. Mental illness in general<br />
health care. England: Wiley, 1995.<br />
3. American Psychiatric Association A. DSM IV.<br />
Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association;<br />
1995.<br />
4. Kessler R, Zhao S, Blazer D, Swartz M. Prevalence,<br />
correlates, and course <strong>of</strong> minor depression in<br />
the national comorbidity survey. J Affect Disord<br />
1997;45(1–2):19–30.<br />
5. Sadek N, Bona J. Subsyndromal symptomatic<br />
depression: a new concept. Depress Anxiety<br />
2000;12:30–39.<br />
6. Judd L, Schettler P, Akiskal H. <strong>The</strong> prevalence,<br />
clinical relevance and public health significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> subthreshold depressions. Psychiatr Clin North<br />
Am 2002;25:685–698.<br />
7. Hickie I. Primary care psychiatry is not specialist<br />
psychiatry in general practice. Med J Aust<br />
1999;170:171–173.<br />
8. Jorm AF, Griffiths KM. Population promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
informal self help strategies for early intervention<br />
against depression and anxiety. Psychol Med<br />
2006;36(3–6).<br />
9. Wagner H, Burns B, Broadhead W, Yarnall K,<br />
Sigmon A, Gaynes B. Minor depresssion in family<br />
practice: functional morbidity, co-morbidity,<br />
service utilisation and outcomes. Psychol Med<br />
2000;30:1377–1390.<br />
10. <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe Research Group. <strong>The</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
common mental health problems in general practice.<br />
Fam Pract 2006;23:53–59.<br />
11. Dowell A, Garrett S, Collings S, McBain L, McKinlay<br />
E, Stanley J. Primary Mental Health Initiatives:<br />
Interim Report. Wellington: School <strong>of</strong> Medicine &<br />
Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Otago, Wellington,<br />
2007;242.<br />
12. <strong>The</strong> MaGPIe Research Group. <strong>General</strong><br />
practitioner recognition <strong>of</strong> mental ilness in the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> a ‘gold standard’. Aust NZ J Psychiatry<br />
2004;38:789–794.<br />
13. Goldberg D. Plato versus Aristotle: categorical and<br />
dimensional models for common mental disorders.<br />
Compr Psychiatry 2000;41:8–13.<br />
14. Backenstrass M, Frank A, Joest K, Hingman S,<br />
Mundt C, Kronmuller K. A comparative study<br />
<strong>of</strong> nonspecific depressive symptoms and minor<br />
depression regarding functional impairment and<br />
associated characteristics in primary care. Compr<br />
Psychiatry 2006;47:35–41.<br />
76 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
15. Collings S. Clinical practice is as important as<br />
diagnosis. BMJ 2001;322(13 Jan):80–81.<br />
16. Collings S, MaGPie Research Group. Disability and<br />
the detection <strong>of</strong> mental disorder in primary care. Soc<br />
Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:994–1002.<br />
17. Dew K, Dowell A, McLeod D, Collings S, Bushnell<br />
J. ‘This glorious twilight zone <strong>of</strong> uncertainty’: mental<br />
health consultations in general practice in <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>Zealand</strong>. Soc Sci Med 2005;61(6):1189–1200.<br />
18. Klinkman MS. Competing demands in psychosocial<br />
care: A model for the identification and<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> depressive disorders in primary care.<br />
Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1997;19:98–111.<br />
19. Hemmings A. A systematic review <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> brief psychological therapies in primary<br />
health care. Fam Syst Health 2000;18(3):279–313.<br />
20. Dowell A, Garrett S, Collings S, McBain L, McKinlay<br />
E, Stanley J. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Primary Mental<br />
Health Initiatives: summary report 2008. Wellington:<br />
Otago University Wellington and Ministry<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health; 2008.<br />
21. Bower P. <strong>The</strong> clinical effectiveness <strong>of</strong> couselling in<br />
primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.<br />
Psychol Med 2003;33:203–215.<br />
22. Willemse G, Smit F, Cuijpers P, Tiemens B. Minimal<br />
contact psychotherapy for sub-threshold depression<br />
in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.<br />
Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:416–421.<br />
23. Mead N, MacDonald W, Bower P, Lovell K, Richards<br />
D, Roberts C, et al. <strong>The</strong> clinical effectiveness <strong>of</strong> guided<br />
self-help versus waiting-list control in the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> anxiety and depression: a randomised<br />
controlled trial. Psychol Med 2005;35:1633–1643.<br />
24. Barkham M, Shapiro DA, Hardy GE, Rees A. Psychotherapy<br />
in two-plus-one sessions: Outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />
a randomized controlled trial <strong>of</strong> cognitive-behavioral<br />
and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy for<br />
subsyndromal depression. J Consult Clin Psychol<br />
1999;67(2):201–211.<br />
25. Klerman GL, Budman S, Berwick D, Weissman<br />
MM, Damico-White J, Demby A, et al. Efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
a brief psychosocial intervention for symptoms <strong>of</strong><br />
stress and distress among patients in primary care.<br />
Med Care 1987;25(11):1078–88.<br />
26. Jorm A, Griffiths K, Christensen H, Parslow R.<br />
Actions taken to cope with depression at different<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> severity: a community survey. Psychol<br />
Med 2004;34:293–299.<br />
27. den Boer P, Wiersma D, van den Bosch R. Why is<br />
self-help neglected in the treatment <strong>of</strong> emotional<br />
disorders? Psychol Med 2004;34:959–971.<br />
28. Roth A, Fonagy P. What works for whom? A critical<br />
review <strong>of</strong> psychotherapy research. 2nd ed. <strong>New</strong><br />
York: Guilford Press; 2005.<br />
29. Parker G. Evaluating treatments for the mood<br />
disorders: time for the evidence to get real. Aust<br />
NZ J Psychiatry 2004;38(6):408–414.<br />
30. Parker G, Parker I, Brotchie H, Stuart S. Interpersonal<br />
psychotherapy for depression? <strong>The</strong> need<br />
to define its ecological niche. J Affect Disord<br />
2006;95(1–3):1–11.<br />
31. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. <strong>The</strong> Primary Health Care<br />
Strategy. Wellington: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health; 2001.<br />
32. Mulder R. An epidemic <strong>of</strong> depression or the medicalisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> unhappiness? NZ Family Physician<br />
2005;32(3):161–163.<br />
33. Mulder R. Psychiatric illness in primary care:<br />
whom should we treat? NZMJ 2003;116(1171).<br />
34. Bower P, Gilbody S. Stepped care in psychological<br />
therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency:<br />
Narrative literature review. Br J Psychiatry<br />
20 05;186(1):11–17.<br />
Mind over matter—implications for general practice<br />
Andrew corin MBChB, FRNZCGP<br />
For centuries, it has been recognised<br />
that the mind has power over the<br />
body, and experience <strong>of</strong> external<br />
stimuli is subjective and variable. This<br />
paper will explore some <strong>of</strong> the evidence<br />
for this, and seek to apply the phenomenon<br />
to a health care setting.<br />
In the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> (NZ) primary care<br />
environment where patients are increasingly<br />
critical <strong>of</strong> the service they receive,<br />
where retention <strong>of</strong> capitation base is<br />
important, and recruitment <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />
new patients is desirable and, most importantly,<br />
where efficient delivery <strong>of</strong> quality<br />
health care is paramount, a good under-<br />
CORREsPONDENCE tO:<br />
Andrew P Corin<br />
CentralMed, 434 Devonport Rd,<br />
Tauranga, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
andrewc@centralmed.co.nz<br />
standing <strong>of</strong> the relationship between<br />
expectations and experience is vital. 1<br />
Patients in primary care are increasingly<br />
mobile, and many will seek provision <strong>of</strong><br />
their health care from various sources,<br />
depending on the specific problem. This<br />
may be due to a desire for confidentiality,<br />
an opportunity to seek specialised<br />
care, or merely a geographical or temporal<br />
convenience. <strong>The</strong> fourth reason for<br />
patient movement is dissatisfaction with<br />
care provision, from phone to reception<br />
to nursing and doctor involvement. <strong>The</strong><br />
advent <strong>of</strong> fully capitated general practice<br />
funding in NZ is encouraging patients<br />
to seek all their primary care needs from<br />
the one provider, as subsidy is enrolment-specific<br />
to one practice.<br />
If general practitioners and primary care<br />
business owners are able to understand<br />
and cooperate with patient expectations,<br />
EssAYs<br />
they will have better opportunity to manage<br />
patient movement and financial risk, as<br />
well as provide improved health outcomes.<br />
Many studies have been undertaken to<br />
demonstrate the psychological relationship<br />
between the brain’s expectation <strong>of</strong><br />
a sensory input, and the actual report<br />
<strong>of</strong> that experience. 2–7 Most famous are<br />
the experiments involving wine tasting<br />
and pain stimulation. In these various<br />
blinded experiments, different subjects<br />
reported variable experiences despite<br />
identical sensory challenges. Being told<br />
that you are drinking an expensive<br />
wine, or about to receive a reduced pain<br />
impulse, results in tasting a fine wine<br />
or feeling less pain, despite the wine<br />
being poor or pain level unchanged,<br />
respectively. <strong>The</strong> conclusions are that the<br />
pre-frontal cortex modulates the actual<br />
sensory assessment to fit with a pre-determined<br />
expectation. Indeed, Magnetic<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 77
EssAYs<br />
Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis<br />
demonstrates complex cerebral processes<br />
involved in the association <strong>of</strong> expectation<br />
and subjective pain experience. 6 In<br />
this study subjects with a positive (more<br />
optimistic) expectation <strong>of</strong> the pain experience<br />
reported reduced pain levels. MRI<br />
has also been used to demonstrate that<br />
altering a subject’s expectation <strong>of</strong> a specific<br />
taste will modify brain activity in<br />
that related region <strong>of</strong> the cortex, and so<br />
subjectively alter the taste experience. 7<br />
<strong>The</strong> relevance to primary care is that if<br />
GPs able to understand the expectations<br />
<strong>of</strong> their patients and over time create an<br />
expectation set that is one <strong>of</strong> satisfaction<br />
and wellness, the level <strong>of</strong> health,<br />
compliance with treatment and patient<br />
retention will be maximised. 8<br />
More specifically, the following example<br />
may help:<br />
Ms D is a 46-year-old woman. She is<br />
eight weeks post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy,<br />
and suffering severe right subscapula<br />
pain, with nausea, weight loss<br />
and insomnia. She has been thoroughly<br />
assessed in recent weeks by her surgeon<br />
as an outpatient and then an inpatient<br />
for six days, with no cause for her pain<br />
found. She was treated with strong analgesia,<br />
without improvement.<br />
Her sister, who is a patient <strong>of</strong> mine,<br />
suggested that a second opinion from me<br />
would help her. Examination <strong>of</strong> Ms D<br />
was normal, apart from her anxious and<br />
exhausted appearance.<br />
My suspicion was that there was a complex<br />
neuralgia process here, heightened<br />
by her anxiety, and I recommended cessation<br />
<strong>of</strong> her tramadol, and started a low<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> gabapentin. Reassurance was an<br />
important part <strong>of</strong> the consultation.<br />
At review one week later Ms D reported<br />
almost full resolution <strong>of</strong> her pain,<br />
insomnia and nausea after taking one<br />
gabapentin dose! At that consult she also<br />
confessed to having significant preoperative<br />
anxiety regarding the outcome<br />
<strong>of</strong> the surgery.<br />
I believe that the dramatic resolution <strong>of</strong><br />
her pain syndrome was largely mediated<br />
by her state <strong>of</strong> mind, and the expectation<br />
created at the consultation <strong>of</strong><br />
improvement. In addition, I suspect that<br />
her atypical pain behaviour following<br />
surgery may well have been due to her<br />
anxious expectation <strong>of</strong> a poor outcome<br />
from the operation.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are two <strong>issue</strong>s which should be<br />
considered and addressed by a GP concerned<br />
about the realities <strong>of</strong> maintaining<br />
a successful medical practice. Firstly,<br />
and waiting environment, being given<br />
opportunity to talk and be listened to by<br />
the doctor, having clear communication<br />
and a management plan from the doctor,<br />
a focus on preventative medicine, and<br />
having confidence in the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism<br />
and skill <strong>of</strong> the doctor. 9 Patients gave<br />
higher priority than GPs to availability<br />
and accessibility <strong>of</strong> the practice and seeing<br />
the same GP. 10<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the literature on patient priorities<br />
found that the most common priorities<br />
were informative-ness, ‘humane-ness’,<br />
and competence/accuracy. 11 Other aspects<br />
included involving patients in decisions,<br />
time for care, availability/accessibility,<br />
exploring patients’ needs, good communication<br />
and availability <strong>of</strong> special services.<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> an effective clinical and consultation relationship<br />
involves assessing expectations and agendas, and<br />
educating the patient where those expectations and<br />
agendas are inappropriate<br />
they should seek to have an understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> the expectations <strong>of</strong> their patients.<br />
This will <strong>of</strong>ten not be immediately obvious<br />
or volunteered, and a relationship<br />
<strong>of</strong> trust may be necessary before honest<br />
expectations are volunteered. Secondly,<br />
they should aim to create a set <strong>of</strong> expectations<br />
that are associated with patient<br />
satisfaction, and thus achieve business<br />
growth, patient health and staff gratification.<br />
<strong>The</strong> expectation <strong>of</strong> the patient<br />
can reasonably be influenced by their<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medical practice they attend. If the staff<br />
consistently provides prompt, informative<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>essional health care, this<br />
will become the expectation and, indeed,<br />
the experience, even when occasionally<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> care is substandard.<br />
Issues to consider here are acceptable<br />
access and cost, acceptable waiting times<br />
Webb and Lloyd identified two strong<br />
factors which influenced the management<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> GPs in two North<br />
London practices. 12 <strong>The</strong> first was the<br />
patient’s level <strong>of</strong> anxiety. If a given<br />
patient presented with a problem about<br />
which they were particularly anxious,<br />
they were more likely to receive either<br />
a prescription or hospital referral. <strong>The</strong><br />
second was patient expectation. This<br />
suggests that the patient also communicated<br />
the expectation <strong>of</strong> either prescription<br />
or referral.<br />
A medical practitioner needs to balance<br />
patient expectations with the realities<br />
<strong>of</strong> clinically appropriate and responsible<br />
practice. It is obviously not appropriate<br />
to prescribe antibiotics at every patient<br />
request, nor order every test a patient demands,<br />
nor refer without restraint. Part <strong>of</strong><br />
an effective clinical and consultation re-<br />
78 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
lationship involves assessing expectations<br />
and agendas, and educating the patient<br />
where those expectations and agendas<br />
are inappropriate. <strong>The</strong> GP and their team<br />
are well placed and generally respected<br />
opinion-holders, such that in the space <strong>of</strong><br />
a consultation unreasonable expectations<br />
can be identified and modified.<br />
<strong>New</strong>somel and Wright present an excellent<br />
summary with exhaustive references<br />
relating to the theories <strong>of</strong> satisfaction. 13<br />
In particular, the ‘zone <strong>of</strong> tolerance’<br />
seems to fit the medical model. Here<br />
patients have a zone <strong>of</strong> expectation from<br />
the health care contact. If the actual<br />
service delivery falls within this zone,<br />
or above it, then satisfaction is experienced.<br />
<strong>The</strong> more important the health<br />
experience, the more narrow the zone <strong>of</strong><br />
tolerance. If the expectation levels are<br />
too high, the patient is more likely to<br />
be dissatisfied more <strong>of</strong>ten. However, the<br />
theory propounded to under promise to<br />
achieve higher levels <strong>of</strong> satisfaction is<br />
not well supported.<br />
Clearly, it is important to understand<br />
what the zone <strong>of</strong> expectation is for a patient,<br />
reinforce this when it is appropriate,<br />
and seek to adjust it when inappropriate.<br />
GPs, by virtue <strong>of</strong> their training<br />
and experience, are generally adept at<br />
adapting style and structure in the consultation<br />
to suit the needs <strong>of</strong> the patient<br />
and doctor. Thus, it should present no<br />
significant challenge to suggest that<br />
the GP assesses the expectations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient on a regular basis, and adjusts<br />
the interaction accordingly. Two patients<br />
who receive identical care may evaluate<br />
the consultation differently, according to<br />
their expectations. 14,15<br />
A recent US survey <strong>of</strong> physician attitudes<br />
to prescribing ‘placebos’ revealed a<br />
reasonably widespread acceptance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> exploiting the patient’s expectation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a treatment by using a pharmacologically<br />
neutral substance to achieve a<br />
therapeutic outcome. 16<br />
<strong>The</strong> opening gambit <strong>of</strong> a consultation<br />
such as ‘What can I do for you?’ or ‘how<br />
can I help today?’ provides opportunity<br />
for the patient to verbalise and GP to<br />
assess the agenda and expectation set for<br />
the interaction. In addition, during and<br />
at the end <strong>of</strong> the consultation there can<br />
be opportunity to reinforce the management<br />
message. This can take the form <strong>of</strong><br />
simple repetition, or may include positive<br />
suggestion such as ‘I am sure you will<br />
improve with this medication’. Whilst<br />
this is not medico-legally binding promise-making,<br />
it can be a very powerful tool<br />
to turn the pre-frontal cortex activity<br />
into one that supports the optimal health<br />
goals <strong>of</strong> the doctor and patient.<br />
In summary then, understanding<br />
patients and their expectations from the<br />
health care experience is important in<br />
targeting intervention and management.<br />
Such an understanding will provide opportunity<br />
for maximising the success <strong>of</strong><br />
health care, from building location and<br />
design, to staffing and training, to education<br />
strategies and models <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />
care delivery, as well as to the nuances<br />
<strong>of</strong> the individual consultation.<br />
References<br />
1. Gabbott M, Hogg G. Competing for Patients:<br />
Understanding Consumer Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Primary<br />
Care. J Manag Med 1994;8(1):12–18.<br />
2. Koyama T, McHaffie J, Laurienti P, Coghill<br />
RC. <strong>The</strong> subjective experience <strong>of</strong> pain: where<br />
expectation becomes reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci<br />
2005;102(36):12950–12955.<br />
3. d’Hauteville F, Fornerino M, Perrouty J. Disconfirmation<br />
<strong>of</strong> taste as a measure <strong>of</strong> region <strong>of</strong> origin<br />
equity: An experimental study on five French wine<br />
regions. Intl J Wine Bus Res 2007;19(1):33–48.<br />
4. Coggins A, Beardsmore A. Blind Faith. <strong>The</strong> Strad<br />
(<strong>New</strong>squest Specialist Media Limited). Feb 2007.<br />
5. Taber G, Mondavi R. Judgement <strong>of</strong> Paris: California<br />
vs. France and the Historic 1976 Paris Tasting<br />
That Revolutionized Wine. Simon and Schuster<br />
Adult Publishing Group; Nov 2006.352.<br />
6. Berk L. Beta-endorphins and HGH increase are associated<br />
with both the anticipation and experience<br />
<strong>of</strong> mirthful laughter. Paper presented at: American<br />
Physiological Society session at Experimental Biology;<br />
2006 March 31; SanFrancisco, CA.<br />
7. Sarinopoulos I, Dixon GE, Short SJ, Davidson RJ,<br />
Nitschke JB.Brain mechanisms <strong>of</strong> expectation<br />
associated with insula and amygdala response<br />
EssAYs<br />
to aversive taste: Implications for placebo. Brain<br />
Behav and Immun 2006;20:120–132.<br />
8. Kumar R, Kirking D, Hass S, et al. <strong>The</strong> association<br />
<strong>of</strong> consumer expectation, experiences and satisfaction<br />
with newly prescribed medicines. Qual Life<br />
Res 2007;16(7):1127–1136.<br />
9. Rahman MM, Rahman S, Begum N, Asaduzzaman<br />
AM, Shahjahan M, Firoz A, Metul MS. Client<br />
expectation from doctors: Expectation—reality<br />
gap. KUMJ 2007;5 (4):566–573.<br />
10. Vedsted P, Mainz J, Lauritzen T, Olesen F. Patient<br />
and GP agreement on aspects <strong>of</strong> general practice<br />
care. Fam Pract 2002;19:339–343.<br />
11. Wensing M, Jung H, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R.<br />
A systematic review <strong>of</strong> the literature on patient<br />
priorities for general practice care. Soc Sci Med<br />
1998;47(10):1573–1588.<br />
12. Webb S, Lloyd M. Prescribing and referral<br />
in general practice: a study <strong>of</strong> patients’<br />
expectations and doctors’ actions. Br J Gen<br />
Pract.1994;44(381):165–169.<br />
13. <strong>New</strong>somel P, Wright G. A review <strong>of</strong> patient<br />
satisfaction: 1. Concepts <strong>of</strong> satisfaction. Br Den J<br />
1999;186(4):161–165.<br />
14. Lilford RJ, Brown CA. Using outcomes to monitor<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> clinical practice—handle with care.<br />
BMJ 2007;335:648–650.<br />
15. Conway T, Willcocks S. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> expectations in<br />
the perception <strong>of</strong> health care quality: developing<br />
a conceptual model. Intl J Health Care Qual Assur<br />
Inc Leadersh Health Serv 1997;10(2-3):131–40.<br />
16. Tilburt J, Emanuel E, Kaptchuk T, Curlin F, Miller<br />
FG. Prescribing ‘placebo treatments’: results <strong>of</strong><br />
national survey <strong>of</strong> US internists and rheumatologists.<br />
BMJ 2008;337:a1938.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 79
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR<br />
Vignette from the ‘olden days’<br />
Many years ago, when I was a Southland country GP, I<br />
was called to visit an elderly lady living alone. <strong>The</strong> front<br />
‘fence’ was an indication <strong>of</strong> what was to come. <strong>The</strong> neglected<br />
bushes had grown to tall trees, shading the house. <strong>The</strong> decaying<br />
farmhouse had not seen paint or maintenance in many<br />
years.<br />
Entering through the billiard room <strong>of</strong> this erstwhile mansion,<br />
I noticed the large arched skylight leaking at the corners,<br />
with green mould growing down the walls. In the dim and<br />
dusty bedroom I found an emaciated 80-year-old lady thin as a<br />
Belsen concentration camp victim. <strong>The</strong> low point <strong>of</strong> the clinical<br />
examination was finding wriggling maggots under each<br />
shrunken breast.<br />
Transferred to hospital, she died in a few days. <strong>The</strong> frail old<br />
soul would have had little resistance to the basal pneumonia<br />
that ended her days. On enquiry, it transpired that she had<br />
lived alone for many years, the last <strong>of</strong> the family, after caring<br />
for her father until he died <strong>of</strong> old age.<br />
She had been living without heating (in Southland winters!)<br />
and severely restricting her diet, all to save money to<br />
bequeath to Scottish cousins she had never met. How strange<br />
are the ways <strong>of</strong> the human race! I trust the inheritors <strong>of</strong> such<br />
hardly come by money were duly appreciative.<br />
Lance Austin<br />
Concern about the name change<br />
read ePulse 16 September with much interest noting the sug-<br />
I gestion that the journal invites nurses and community pharmacists<br />
to be a part <strong>of</strong> the journal and that there be a move to<br />
focus on primary health care with a name change to that <strong>of</strong><br />
the Journal <strong>of</strong> Primary Health Care. Nurses and pharmacists<br />
already have their journals.<br />
<strong>The</strong> journal as I understand its role is to focus on medical<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s and the family physician. <strong>The</strong> cornerstone <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
care is about the credentials <strong>of</strong> the practising family physician.<br />
What I hope your role as the new editor is, firstly, to<br />
attract more enthusiasm from colleagues to submit articles for<br />
publication. Letters to the Editor might occupy one section <strong>of</strong><br />
the journal.<br />
If ever a change in name is contemplated then might I suggest<br />
that the college become, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Family Physicians, then we achieve equity with our Physician<br />
colleagues in other branches <strong>of</strong> medicine. <strong>The</strong> medical<br />
specialty <strong>of</strong> primary care therefore is a focus on the interaction<br />
between the patient as a family member and the attending<br />
family physician.<br />
It is an unwise move to dilute this role <strong>of</strong> the GP for which<br />
the primary care strategy appears to be achieving.<br />
Henare Broughton<br />
Homeopathy and acupuncture reviews are not CME<br />
am concerned to find the Journal Review Service continuing<br />
I to publish reviews <strong>of</strong> homeopathy and acupuncture under the<br />
guise <strong>of</strong> ‘continuing medical education’. 1 I am, however, heartened<br />
by Dr Tony Hanne’s trenchant criticism <strong>of</strong> homeopathy.<br />
This absurd belief system has no place in any medical journal.<br />
Acupuncture can be similarly criticised. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reviews are unintentionally funny. Could there be anything<br />
more absurd than the statement2 ‘One could also argue that a<br />
major acuppoint, e.g. LR-3, from the Liver meridian for detoxification<br />
should have been included in the prescription used.’?<br />
Such foolishness reminded me <strong>of</strong> a spo<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a British Medical<br />
Journal article entitled ‘Delayed ketoalkalotic effects <strong>of</strong><br />
aldosterone-producing adenoma in a man with a pig’s head’.<br />
Although I still have a copy <strong>of</strong> this I am unsure as its provenance.<br />
<strong>The</strong> new Editor has promised to improve the journal even<br />
further. Please let us drop the alternative medical nonsense<br />
and have more useful material from people like Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Bruce Arroll and others.<br />
Dr John Welch MBChB FRNZCGP DipAvMed<br />
Competing Interests: I am a reformed acupuncturist, member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Skeptic’s Society for whom I write a column (Hokum Locum)<br />
on alternative medicine.<br />
References<br />
1. NZFP 2008; 35:74–75.<br />
2. NZFP 2008; 35:137.<br />
Letters may respond to published papers, briefly report original research or case reports, or raise matters <strong>of</strong> interest relevant to<br />
primary health care. <strong>The</strong> best letters are succinct and stimulating. Letters <strong>of</strong> no more than 400 words may be emailed to:<br />
editor@rnzcgp.org.nz. All letters are subject to editing and may be shortened.<br />
80 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Intravenous Vitamin C<br />
Enjoyed seeing the Vitamin C article in the recent NZMJ<br />
[sic]. Was interesting and informative. I enjoy incorporating<br />
some nutritional work into my own general practice. Would<br />
enjoy seeing more nutritional medicine type articles over time.<br />
Dr Helen Smith, GP<br />
How disappointing that the NZFP saw fit to publish a<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> personal opinion and anecdote as an ‘original<br />
scientific paper’ (Vitamin C: Evidence, application and commentary.<br />
Melissa Ge et al. NZFP 2008;35:312–318).<br />
After a careful read <strong>of</strong> the claims that megadoses <strong>of</strong> vitamin<br />
C can cure a wide range <strong>of</strong> terminal illnesses as well as<br />
infectious diseases I was quite intrigued and sceptical. When<br />
looking further however, I noticed the references used to<br />
authenticate this paper do not provide the evidence to support<br />
the claims.<br />
Here is a single example: ‘Over the past 10-year period I have<br />
treated over 9550 patients with large doses <strong>of</strong> vitamin C’. 1 <strong>The</strong><br />
author <strong>of</strong> this paper, Cathcart, does not discuss these patients—<br />
he only refers to single episodes and individual results. He also<br />
mentions that when treating bacterial infections ‘Ascorbic Acid<br />
should be used with the appropriate antibiotic.’ He reports that<br />
this broadens the spectrum for the antibiotic but the evidence is<br />
lacking any specific information—it is just noted in passing.<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors <strong>of</strong> this paper claim that Cathcart ‘was giving<br />
megadoses <strong>of</strong> vitamin C to patients with polio, diphtheria,<br />
herpes, chicken pox, influenza, measles, mumps, pneumonia,<br />
viral encephalitis and Shiga toxin poisoning.’ This scientific<br />
paper was written before the availability <strong>of</strong> the polio vaccine<br />
in the 1940s. <strong>The</strong> patients treated with the IV Vitamin C were<br />
‘considered infected’ during an epidemic, which is different<br />
than a confirmed case <strong>of</strong> polio. 1 Surely the authors <strong>of</strong> this<br />
paper aren’t suggesting that vitamin C is a treatment for polio<br />
based on one article.<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors advocated ‘Several case studies, small clinical<br />
trials and in vitro experiments have been published suggesting<br />
that vitamin C at the correct dosage has anti-cancer effects.’<br />
This might lead one to believe that vitamin C can hinder<br />
cancer cells from metastasising when really the authors are<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering ‘palliative’ care for terminal patients.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no disclosure <strong>of</strong> the possible adverse effects. Extreme<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid are not as harmless as suggested in<br />
this paper—when ingested in large amounts ‘may cause renal<br />
failure’. 2 Vitamin C deficiency may cause scurvy but the effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> an overdose <strong>of</strong> vitamin C are not necessarily innocuous.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> vitamin C in disease intervention at doses<br />
higher than previously considered relevant should be thor-<br />
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR<br />
oughly investigated in a clinical setting.’ I totally agree with<br />
this statement as many <strong>of</strong> the referenced articles lacked the<br />
evidence to support the claims made, specifically using vitamin<br />
C to treat infectious diseases.<br />
Erin Hanlon-Wake, Registered midwife<br />
References<br />
1. Cathcart RF. Vitamin C, titrating to bowel tolerance, anascorbemia, and<br />
acute induced scurvy. Med Hypothesis 1981;7:1359–1376.<br />
2. Material Safety Data Sheet: Ascorbic Acid MSDS. ScienceLab. http://<br />
www.sciencelab.com/xMSDS-Ascorbic_acid-9922972. Published 9<br />
October 2005. Accessed 5 May 2008.<br />
was appalled to see the opinion piece in NZFP masquerad-<br />
I ing as an original scientific paper ‘Vitamin C: Evidence,<br />
application and commentary’ but will resist the temptation to<br />
perform an autopsy and critique on the authors’ interpretation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the literature.<br />
It appears that all <strong>of</strong> the authors have a vested interest in<br />
plying desperate patients with intravenous vitamin C, presumably<br />
at a reasonable pr<strong>of</strong>it, and to be fair this is declared.<br />
However, it is deceitful to misrepresent the literature and<br />
evidence. A quick glance at the list <strong>of</strong> references is enough to<br />
raise immediate scepticism as they generally consist <strong>of</strong> hypotheses,<br />
laboratory studies or case studies; some are 30 and even<br />
60 years old. This is about as low level as evidence gets and is<br />
certainly not sufficient to inform practice.<br />
One part that is so dubious that it is actually funny is the<br />
table that shows Vitamin C synthesis in the rat, dog and goat<br />
and then extrapolates this to humans. Humans are not rats,<br />
dogs or goats and I think we have had enough lessons from<br />
animal models to know this. If humans behaved like their distant<br />
rodent cousins according to laboratory studies we would<br />
have cures for a lot more diseases than we do now. This is not<br />
something that belongs under the name science as it does not<br />
employ any.<br />
Helen Petousis-Harris, Senior Lecturer, <strong>General</strong> Practice and<br />
Primary Health Care<br />
REpLy: JPHC will publish the nature and quality <strong>of</strong> evidence<br />
around efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> herbal medicines in our column<br />
Charms and Harms. We also welcome systematic reviews and<br />
meta-analyses on complementary and alternative medicines<br />
(CAM) and nutritional supplements that critique the available<br />
evidence on efficacy and harm, produce evidence tables and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer recommendations based on the graded evidence in the<br />
accepted scientific fashion (see http://www.rnzcgp.org.nz/<br />
journal-<strong>of</strong>-primary-health-care/systematic reviews). – Editor<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 81
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
<strong>The</strong> Baby Business:<br />
What’s happened to maternity care in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong><br />
By Lynda Exton<br />
Review by William Fergusson, GP<br />
<strong>The</strong> Baby Business is a modern history<br />
book that had to be written.<br />
Its author, Christchurch <strong>General</strong><br />
Practitioner Lynda Exton, needed a<br />
more than usual amount <strong>of</strong> courage and<br />
determination to surmount this task.<br />
All participants in the tortuous saga <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>’s maternity services over<br />
the last 18 years should be interested,<br />
if not required, to read this detailed<br />
and extensively referenced account <strong>of</strong><br />
events. <strong>The</strong> book manages piece by<br />
piece to explain how it is that a medical<br />
sub-speciality, that <strong>of</strong> the general<br />
practitioner obstetrician, that was both<br />
revered by its practitioners and in ceaseless<br />
demand from its patients, could be<br />
simply erased.<br />
What ideologically driven unholy alliance<br />
<strong>of</strong> ministry bureaucrats, politicians and<br />
midwifery interests expended so much<br />
effort over so long to ensure the absolute<br />
demise <strong>of</strong> GP Obstetrics? <strong>The</strong> cast <strong>of</strong> characters<br />
is fairly well detailed in the book. It<br />
stops short however <strong>of</strong> attempting to properly<br />
explain the rationale <strong>of</strong> this shadowy<br />
force. What were they really thinking?<br />
Perhaps more time needs to elapse for clarity<br />
around this to emerge. <strong>General</strong>ly, the<br />
perpetrators have continued to imagine<br />
themselves sunned by some reflected<br />
glory in achieving choice for women, or<br />
the de-medicalisation <strong>of</strong> childbirth, or<br />
some such thing. <strong>The</strong> evidence the book<br />
presents suggests they are doing so somewhere<br />
in a parallel universe that does not<br />
relate to mothers and babies in NZ.<br />
<strong>The</strong> beginning chapters are dedicated<br />
to some <strong>of</strong> the landmarks in the history<br />
<strong>of</strong> our maternity service, and reference<br />
several brave and dedicated early NZ<br />
doctors. <strong>The</strong> author documents many <strong>of</strong><br />
the national controversies <strong>of</strong> the time,<br />
such as the use <strong>of</strong> ‘twilight sleep’, infant<br />
feedings and the culture change towards<br />
the hospitalisation <strong>of</strong> childbirth. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
are vividly conjured images <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong><br />
the hair-raising and skilful exploits <strong>of</strong><br />
our early GPOs and midwives. This sets<br />
the stage for the inexplicable, calculated<br />
and ruthless path that was pursued, it<br />
seems, from the anti medical politics<br />
<strong>of</strong> the late 1980s, to eliminate choice<br />
<strong>of</strong> maternity care provider and create<br />
a midwifery-only service in NZ. <strong>The</strong><br />
author has painstakingly gathered the<br />
meagre existing scraps <strong>of</strong> data by which<br />
this momentous juggling <strong>of</strong> vulnerable<br />
lives was ‘monitored’ or evaluated, and<br />
there emerges the sketchy outline <strong>of</strong> a<br />
deteriorating maternity service relative<br />
to our past performance, and the services<br />
within comparable countries.<br />
Perhaps it is only now these policies have<br />
fully achieved their goals that the wider<br />
public will be able to read this book and<br />
gasp in horror at what has been taken<br />
from them. I am reminded <strong>of</strong> a quote<br />
from Doris Gordon’s autobiography Back<br />
Blocks Baby Doctor in which she recounts<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> the NZ Obstetric and<br />
Gynaecological Society, in February<br />
1927. <strong>The</strong> O & G Society, as it came to<br />
be known, was formed in response to a<br />
drive from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health <strong>of</strong> the<br />
time to remove doctors from maternity<br />
care. <strong>New</strong>spaper headlines <strong>of</strong> the day<br />
exclaimed ‘women advised not to have<br />
doctors at confinements’. <strong>The</strong> society<br />
went on to be a bastion <strong>of</strong> CME provision<br />
throughout the country for GPOs,<br />
specialists and midwives for many<br />
decades, until it was severely holed by<br />
the infamous July 1996 Section 88 Maternity<br />
Notice, and sank without trace<br />
soon afterwards as GPs pulled out <strong>of</strong><br />
maternity care. Doris Gordon recounts:<br />
‘fed up with ever increasing “shalts”<br />
and “shalt nots” 180 doctors signed as<br />
foundation members. A few doctors<br />
who had no prospects <strong>of</strong> begetting or<br />
delivering babies gave us the backing <strong>of</strong><br />
their membership, saying, “you do well<br />
to found your society, for what threatens<br />
maternity care today will threaten all<br />
branches <strong>of</strong> medicine tomorrow”.’<br />
Review by Joan Carll, midwife<br />
<strong>The</strong> Baby Business records the<br />
changes to the NZ maternity service<br />
over the past 20 years and, in<br />
particular, the changes for general practitioners<br />
which led to their move away from<br />
active involvement in maternity care.<br />
<strong>The</strong> book outlines the journey <strong>of</strong> change<br />
beginning with a history <strong>of</strong> birthing<br />
from the 1880s. <strong>The</strong> history gives<br />
insight into the players who determined<br />
the early formation <strong>of</strong> the service and an<br />
explanation for the difficulties to change<br />
a service that became deeply entrenched.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ensuing changes to NZ’s maternity<br />
service (well passed its use-by-date in<br />
1988) lacked the necessary processes to<br />
prevent the political and collegial fallout<br />
exposed in this recount.<br />
Dr Exton details the changing NZ maternity<br />
service from 1988. However, go<br />
back 10 years to the end <strong>of</strong> the training<br />
<strong>of</strong> midwives at the St Helens Hospitals<br />
82 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
and the talk <strong>of</strong> change at the Midwives<br />
section. A time when women suffered<br />
the indignity <strong>of</strong> enemas, pubic shaves,<br />
episiotomies and limited choice for place<br />
to deliver. Women were even required to<br />
write a letter to have their husband present<br />
in the delivery room! A service that<br />
would encourage any newly graduated<br />
midwife to walk away and say—if that is<br />
midwifery and if that is what having a<br />
baby is about then why would you want<br />
a bar <strong>of</strong> either? Change was inevitable,<br />
supported by pr<strong>of</strong>essionals within the<br />
service, and women and families for<br />
whom the service is all about.<br />
As a midwife I have found the record<br />
<strong>of</strong> events interesting reading and a<br />
forum for reflection and insight into the<br />
turnaround <strong>of</strong> what was certainly a very<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> pregnancy Book:<br />
A guide to pregnancy, birth and a baby’s first three months<br />
3RD EDITION<br />
By Sue Pullon and Cheryl Benn<br />
Review by Jon Wilcox, GP<br />
At first glance the latest edition<br />
<strong>of</strong> this venerable 20-year-old<br />
matter-<strong>of</strong>-fact guide for new<br />
parents looks very different from<br />
earlier versions. It immediately seems<br />
more user friendly and the layout is<br />
now more upmarket—there is an<br />
abundance <strong>of</strong> colour photography and<br />
excellent illustrations. Wellington GP<br />
Sue Pullon has changed the approach<br />
a little to perhaps steer away from the<br />
perceptually ‘medicalised’ editions we<br />
might have been more familiar with<br />
during the infamous years <strong>of</strong> what<br />
some might call the de-commissioning<br />
<strong>of</strong> general practice obstetrics. <strong>The</strong><br />
market is now unashamedly—and<br />
probably in order <strong>of</strong> preference—midwives<br />
and mothers.<br />
unfriendly maternity service to one with<br />
new achievements and challenges.<br />
<strong>The</strong> author captures the feeling <strong>of</strong> grief<br />
felt by GP obstetricians who are no<br />
longer part <strong>of</strong> the maternity service;<br />
however she misses the opportunity to<br />
provide positive steps forward. Hands up<br />
those who have been to their GP needing<br />
attention only to be left in the waiting<br />
room while they dash <strong>of</strong>f to deliver a<br />
baby? Perhaps there was also a need for<br />
general practice to change, and find new<br />
ways to rebuild the relationships with<br />
their patients in a different manner, to<br />
maintain that holistic approach to family<br />
medicine and create the important links<br />
with the new maternity service. I believe<br />
Dr Exton has inadvertently exposed a<br />
missed opportunity for primary care.<br />
Overall the new edition is excellent and<br />
I feel it is good value for new parents.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is accurate information on a huge<br />
range <strong>of</strong> important <strong>issue</strong>s relating to<br />
preparing for pregnancy and childbirth,<br />
including parental leave, benefits, new<br />
maternal serum screening initiatives and<br />
so forth. <strong>General</strong>ly the information is <strong>of</strong><br />
high quality and, even though the book<br />
now could give the impression <strong>of</strong> being<br />
just another ‘touchy feely’ publication<br />
to peruse during the last four weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnancy, it still has the excellent practical<br />
content relating to real life <strong>issue</strong>s<br />
such as common problems in pregnancy,<br />
labour and childbirth. Having been<br />
written from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> a clinician<br />
with a lot <strong>of</strong> experience in obstetrics<br />
and neonatal paediatric care, the<br />
advice is generally extremely sensible<br />
and very comprehensive.<br />
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
A good read for health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who<br />
would like to recall the events <strong>of</strong> NZ’s<br />
changing maternity services. A rather<br />
negative read for consumers who are the<br />
beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the change and remain unable<br />
to assess the current system through<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> data. A reminder to midwives the<br />
challenges have been and continue to be<br />
extreme. And to GPs, who are critically<br />
placed to ensure primary care is seamless,<br />
efficient and continuous, this book<br />
provides reason to look at new ways.<br />
Publisher: Craig Potton Publishing<br />
Publication Date: Oct 2008<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> pages: 260<br />
RRP: $29.99<br />
<strong>The</strong> Baby Business can be ordered<br />
through www.craigpotton.co.nz<br />
Furthermore, Pullon does not give the<br />
reader the misleading impression that<br />
almost all pregnancies and labour are normal<br />
(which can tend to give many mothers<br />
feelings <strong>of</strong> inadequacy or failure) and, as<br />
many <strong>of</strong> us who are still actively involved<br />
in intra-partum care know, each and every<br />
labour has its own idiosyncrasies.<br />
Pullon has joined with midwife Cheryl<br />
Benn to produce the new format and by<br />
and large it has been an excellent team<br />
effort. I have for 20 years recommended<br />
this book to all my own maternity<br />
patients, and for those with limited<br />
resources we have even had a cache <strong>of</strong><br />
secondhand editions to loan for the<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> pregnancy. I would certainly<br />
continue to endorse the latest edition as<br />
first choice for NZ GPs to recommend to<br />
their expecting client couples.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 83
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
Review by Ms Helen Ride, midwife<br />
This is the third edition <strong>of</strong> Pullon<br />
and Benn’s <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Pregnancy<br />
Book. Since it was first<br />
published in 1991 there have been<br />
many changes within the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
maternity care in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> with<br />
the introduction <strong>of</strong> the Lead Maternity<br />
Care system. This third edition has been<br />
written for <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> parents and<br />
parents-to-be and includes information<br />
specific to the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> maternity<br />
system, and all <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>ers. <strong>The</strong><br />
aim <strong>of</strong> the authors is to present a book<br />
which prepares the reader, her partner<br />
and family for the pregnancy, birth and<br />
the first three months <strong>of</strong> the baby’s life.<br />
This book is written chronologically<br />
from planning for a pregnancy through<br />
to the first three months with your<br />
baby, and provides vast amounts <strong>of</strong> information<br />
which appears to cover everything<br />
the reader would wish to know.<br />
It includes the physical and emotional<br />
changes occurring within the pregnant<br />
woman, common health problems,<br />
potential problems and the birth. <strong>The</strong><br />
format <strong>of</strong> the book is very appealing to<br />
the reader. <strong>The</strong> photographs are beautiful,<br />
the diagrams are excellent and the<br />
personal stories complete the experience.<br />
<strong>The</strong> reader can dip in and out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
book choosing specific topics or stages<br />
within the pregnancy to read, and crossreferencing<br />
is made throughout the book<br />
for further information.<br />
This is a very informative book. However,<br />
there is very little reference to homeopathy<br />
throughout the text but there<br />
is a reference within the appendix to the<br />
homeopathy website. I am aware that<br />
quite a few midwives use homeopathy<br />
and many women are interested in this<br />
during their pregnancies yet there was<br />
very little information within the book.<br />
As a former Bereavement Support<br />
Midwife I have a particular interest in<br />
the care and support <strong>of</strong> bereaved parents.<br />
One error that I found within this book<br />
is the information that a baby born dead<br />
Ideological Debates in Family Medicine<br />
By Stephen Buetow and Tim Kenealy<br />
Review by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Marjan Kljakovic,<br />
School <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practice, Rural, &<br />
Indigenous Health, Australian National<br />
University Medical School, Canberra,<br />
Australia<br />
This is a book written for the academic<br />
who likes to ponder ideological<br />
debates that occur within the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> family medicine. <strong>The</strong> book would<br />
also appeal to people who want a comprehensive<br />
way <strong>of</strong> looking at the world <strong>of</strong><br />
general practice and primary health care.<br />
<strong>The</strong> book presents a collection <strong>of</strong> ideas<br />
about family medicine around 13<br />
debates, each <strong>of</strong> which was written in<br />
two chapters posing the affirmative<br />
and negative position on a theme. Each<br />
theme began with the words ‘Family<br />
Medicine should…’ and then continued<br />
with the following words: ‘Refine its<br />
essential attributes; Rediscover a focus<br />
<strong>of</strong> family care; Emphasise population on<br />
health care; Focus on the sick; Encourage<br />
its clinicians to sub-specialise; Tolerate<br />
uncertainty to manage clinical risk; Use<br />
more Evidence Based Medicine than at<br />
present; Shift attention from rationality<br />
to emotions; Encourage the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> Luxury Practices; Promote the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> care through group practice;<br />
Emphasise the Provision <strong>of</strong> Health Care<br />
as a social good; Promote the optimal au-<br />
before 28 weeks gestation does not need<br />
a funeral. However the Births, Deaths<br />
and Marriages Registrations Act 1995<br />
redefined what constituted a still birth<br />
and changed it to a foetus born after 20<br />
weeks gestation or weighing over 400<br />
grams. Babies in this category are legally<br />
required to have a funeral.<br />
I found this book to be informative and<br />
great to read. Many first-time parents<br />
will enjoy reading it from cover to cover.<br />
<strong>The</strong> beautiful photographs add to the<br />
pleasurable experience.<br />
Publisher: Bridget Williams Books<br />
Publication date: Nov 2008<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> pages: 432<br />
Bridget Williams Books<br />
Phone: 04 473 8128<br />
Email: info@bwb.co.nz<br />
Web: www.bwb.co.nz<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Pregnancy Book is<br />
available to health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals at 20%<br />
discount <strong>of</strong>f the recommended retail price<br />
($44 rather than $54.99).<br />
tonomy <strong>of</strong> patients in decision making;<br />
And finally, Self-regulate to best protect<br />
patient and pr<strong>of</strong>essional autonomy’.<br />
<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> giving ideological perspectives<br />
is to <strong>of</strong>fer change in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
family medicine through a normative<br />
thought process. An ideology is a system<br />
<strong>of</strong> abstract thought applied to public<br />
matters, and thus makes this concept<br />
central to family medicine. <strong>The</strong> book<br />
has 36 authors who came from different<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the Western world and therefore<br />
gave very different perspectives<br />
on particular ideological themes. For<br />
example the debate on ‘Family Medicine<br />
should encourage its specialists to<br />
84 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
sub-specialise’ had Leese arguing for<br />
the affirmative having come from the<br />
UK where the concept <strong>of</strong> the generalist<br />
is most developed, and the GP acts<br />
as gatekeepers for specialist services.<br />
Starfield argued for the negative having<br />
come from the USA where the concept<br />
<strong>of</strong> the generalist is least developed and<br />
there is a huge negative impact <strong>of</strong> subspecialisation<br />
in primary care.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the debates reminded me about<br />
themes I had been taking for granted. For<br />
example, Svab and van Weels’ negative position<br />
on ‘Family Medicine should refine<br />
its essential attributes’ reminded me that<br />
family medicine is an emancipated field <strong>of</strong><br />
medicine and no longer needed to debate<br />
this position (been there, done that).<br />
Furthermore, family medicine should get<br />
on with improving its image and be rid <strong>of</strong><br />
‘the harmful benefits <strong>of</strong> extreme complexity,<br />
uniqueness, exclusivity, and threat’.<br />
Other debates taught me a lot. For<br />
example, Bohan and Donohoe argued for<br />
and against the theme: ‘Family Medicine<br />
should encourage the development <strong>of</strong><br />
Luxury Practices’. <strong>The</strong>ir debate revealed<br />
how much luxury Practices have flourished<br />
in the USA in the last few years<br />
and how malignant such a growth was<br />
for patient care and provider greed.<br />
A few <strong>of</strong> the debates annoyed me. For<br />
example Upshur and Tracey’s negative<br />
position that ‘Family Medicine should<br />
use more Evidence Based Medicine<br />
than at present’. <strong>The</strong>y argued that EBM<br />
cannot meet its own standards, is no<br />
Integrating mental health into primary care:<br />
A global perspective<br />
This report on integrating mental<br />
health into primary care, developed<br />
jointly by the World Health<br />
Organization (WHO) and the World Organization<br />
<strong>of</strong> Family Doctors (Wonca),<br />
presents the justification and advantages<br />
<strong>of</strong> providing mental health services in<br />
primary care. It provides advice on how<br />
to implement and scale-up primary care<br />
for mental health, and describes how a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> health systems have successfully<br />
undertaken this transformation.<br />
Key messages<br />
1. Mental disorders affect hundreds<br />
<strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> people and, if left<br />
untreated, create an enormous toll <strong>of</strong><br />
suffering, disability and economic loss.<br />
2. Despite the potential to successfully<br />
treat mental disorders, only a small<br />
minority <strong>of</strong> those in need receive<br />
even the most basic treatment.<br />
3. Integrating mental health services<br />
into primary care is the most viable<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
way <strong>of</strong> closing the treatment gap and<br />
ensuring that people get the mental<br />
health care they need.<br />
Primary care for mental health is<br />
affordable, and investments can bring<br />
important benefits.<br />
Certain skills and competencies<br />
are required to effectively assess,<br />
diagnose, treat, support and refer<br />
people with mental disorders; it is<br />
essential that primary care workers are<br />
adequately prepared and supported in<br />
their mental health work.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no single best practice model<br />
that can be followed by all countries.<br />
Rather, successes have been achieved<br />
through sensible local application <strong>of</strong><br />
broad principles.<br />
Integration is most successful<br />
when mental health is incorporated<br />
into health policy and legislative<br />
frameworks and supported by senior<br />
leadership, adequate resources, and<br />
ongoing governance.<br />
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
superior to other modes <strong>of</strong> obtaining<br />
evidence, and lacks legitimacy. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />
solution was for family medicine ‘to be<br />
descriptive, careful in observation, and<br />
explicitly recognise and integrate the<br />
interpretive grammar <strong>of</strong> medicine’. A<br />
solution I find is easily accepted by an<br />
arcane social scientist <strong>of</strong> family medicine,<br />
rather than a pragmatic GP whose<br />
patient wants evidence from outside the<br />
consultation to answer a health question.<br />
<strong>The</strong> virtue <strong>of</strong> this book is that it does<br />
generate feelings such as annoyance,<br />
disagreement, and surprise. It stimulates<br />
the reader and for that reason alone I<br />
recommend buying this book.<br />
Publisher: Nova Science<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Publication: Dec 2007<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> pages: 302<br />
8. To be fully effective and efficient,<br />
primary care for mental health must<br />
be coordinated with a network <strong>of</strong><br />
services at different levels <strong>of</strong> care<br />
and complemented by broader health<br />
system development.<br />
9. Numerous low- and middle-income<br />
countries have successfully made the<br />
transition to integrated primary care<br />
for mental health.<br />
10. Mental health is central to the values<br />
and principles <strong>of</strong> the Alma Ata<br />
Declaration; holistic care will never<br />
be achieved until mental health is<br />
integrated into primary care.<br />
<strong>The</strong> full report can be accessed at http://<br />
www.globalfamilydoctor.com/index.<br />
asp?PageID=9063<br />
Publisher: World Health Organization and<br />
World Organization <strong>of</strong> Family Doctors<br />
(Wonca)<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> publication: 2008<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> pages: 206<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 85
RESEARCH GEMS<br />
GemS Of NeW ZeAlAND<br />
primary Health Care Research<br />
Access to CME an <strong>issue</strong> for<br />
overseas-trained rural Gps<br />
Difficulty in accessing CME has been<br />
identified as a negative aspect <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
practice in a study investigating retention<br />
<strong>of</strong> overseas-trained doctors in<br />
rural NZ. <strong>The</strong> study included thematic<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> nine in-depth interviews<br />
<strong>of</strong> overseas-trained doctors working<br />
in rural settings. Other factors noted<br />
by interviewees as detracting from the<br />
rural practice environment were reduced<br />
options for employment <strong>of</strong> their spouse<br />
and for secondary schooling, and limited<br />
cultural and entertainment activities.<br />
On the positive side, doctors valued<br />
the scope <strong>of</strong> the practice work and the<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> community loyalty. <strong>The</strong> rural<br />
lifestyle <strong>of</strong>fered also featured as a key<br />
attraction.<br />
Kearns RA, Myers JM, Adair V, Coster H, Coster<br />
G. What makes ‘place’ attractive to overseas-<br />
trained doctors in rural <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>? Health &<br />
Social Care in the Community 2006;14:532-40.<br />
Corresponding author: R. Kearns. Email:<br />
r.kearns@auckland.ac.nz<br />
Antibiotics not first-line treatment<br />
for acute purulent rhinitis<br />
A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> data from seven<br />
RCTs <strong>of</strong> antibiotics versus placebo<br />
for acute purulent rhinitis concludes<br />
that antibiotics are probably effective.<br />
However, as no serious adverse events<br />
occurred in the placebo group, antibiotics<br />
are not indicated as first line treat-<br />
ment. This conclusion is in keeping<br />
with most guidelines which recommend<br />
against using antibiotics on the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> one earlier study. Harms attributed<br />
to antibiotics in the RCTs were mainly<br />
vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain<br />
but also included rashes and hyperactivity<br />
(in children). A treatment approach<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘watchful waiting’ is suggested, with<br />
antibiotics used only when symptoms<br />
have persisted for long enough to concern<br />
parents or patients.<br />
Arroll B, Kenealy T. Are antibiotics effective for<br />
acute purulent rhinitis? Systematic review and<br />
meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> placebo controlled randomised<br />
trials. BMJ 2006;333:279. Corresponding au-<br />
thor: B. Arroll. Email: b.arroll@auckland.ac.nz<br />
problem gamblers <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
have other problems<br />
Primary care screening for problem<br />
gambling highlights common lifestyle<br />
and mental health co-morbidities. <strong>The</strong><br />
cross-sectional study conducted in 51<br />
urban and rural primary care practices<br />
in NZ found that people identified with<br />
concerns about their gambling behaviour<br />
were significantly more likely to have<br />
concerns about alcohol use, recreational<br />
drug use, and smoking. Problems with<br />
depression, anxiety and anger control<br />
were also more likely to be reported by<br />
these individuals. Problem gambling<br />
was readily identified using a brief<br />
multi-item screening tool containing a<br />
validated gambling question: ‘Sometimes<br />
I’ve felt depressed or anxious after a session<br />
<strong>of</strong> gambling—yes or no’. <strong>The</strong> study<br />
signals the potential <strong>of</strong> screening for<br />
problem gambling in the primary care<br />
setting.<br />
Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B, Kerse N, et al.<br />
Primary care patients reporting concerns about<br />
their gambling frequently have other co-occur-<br />
ring lifestyle and mental health <strong>issue</strong>s. BMC<br />
Fam Pract 2006;7:25. Corresponding author:<br />
Felicity Goodyear-Smith Email:f.goodyear-<br />
smith@auckland.ac.nz<br />
No geographic disparity for NZ<br />
women with breast cancer<br />
Studies in Australia, Canada and the<br />
USA have shown that people living in<br />
regional and remote areas have higher<br />
mortality rates from cancer than people<br />
living in urban and suburban areas. A<br />
recent study <strong>of</strong> NZ with breast cancer<br />
showed no such geographic disparity,<br />
however. <strong>The</strong> study drew on the NZ<br />
Cancer Registry Data from a four-year<br />
period, involving 11 340 women. Just<br />
under a third lived within 10km <strong>of</strong> a cancer<br />
centre, another third lived 11–50km<br />
away, and the remaining third lived more<br />
than 50km away. Reasons put forward<br />
to explain the equity seen in stage at<br />
diagnosis include BreastScreen Aotearoa<br />
which has mobile/outreach services, high<br />
community awareness, and the natural<br />
history <strong>of</strong> the disease. Regional coordination<br />
<strong>of</strong> cancer services was seen as<br />
contributing to equity <strong>of</strong> survival, with<br />
GEMS are short précis <strong>of</strong> original papers published by NZ researchers. FOR A COpy <strong>of</strong> a full paper please<br />
email the corresponding author. Researchers, TO HAVE yOUR WORK INCLUDED please send your<br />
references and pdfs <strong>of</strong> your papers to: editor@rnzcgp.org.nz<br />
86 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
service configuration attempting to balance<br />
centralisation and local access.<br />
Bennett H, Marshall R, Campbell I, Lawrenson<br />
R. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> urban versus rural residence<br />
on stage at diagnosis and survival for women<br />
with breast cancer in Aotearoa-<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>.<br />
NZ Med J 2007;120(1266). Corresponding<br />
author: H. Bennett. Email: hayleyandcam@<br />
clear.net.nz<br />
Dairy calves are a potential<br />
source for Giardia infection<br />
A recent Otago study characterising<br />
Giardia genotypes present in calves and<br />
humans has found a substantial overlap<br />
<strong>of</strong> identical genotypes for assemblages<br />
A and B, the only assemblages capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> causing human infection, in the two<br />
hosts. <strong>The</strong> finding implies zoonotic<br />
transmission may have occurred and<br />
demonstrates the possibility <strong>of</strong> the dairy<br />
herd as a reservoir for human infection.<br />
It is <strong>of</strong> particular note given recent intensification<br />
<strong>of</strong> dairying in NZ and the<br />
potential for transmission via waterways<br />
contaminated by run<strong>of</strong>f.<br />
Winkworth CL, Learmonth JL, Matthaei CD,<br />
Townsend CR. Molecular characterization <strong>of</strong><br />
Giardia isolates from calves and humans in a<br />
region in which dairy farming has recently inten-<br />
sified. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:5100-<br />
5105. Corresponding author: C. Winkworth.<br />
Email: Cynthia.winkworth@zoology.otago.ac.nz<br />
Fast acting agents essential<br />
to breakthrough pain<br />
management in cancer<br />
Most breakthrough analgesia for cancer<br />
pain fails to be effective in the time<br />
required. No useful analgesia is therefore<br />
provided but drug adverse effects<br />
increase. This paper addresses this problem,<br />
outlining a systematic, evidencebased<br />
approach to breakthrough pain<br />
management, whether due to end-<strong>of</strong>dose<br />
failure, incident or idiopathic pain.<br />
<strong>The</strong> paper details non-pharmacological<br />
as well as pharmacological approaches,<br />
while highlighting the value <strong>of</strong> fast<br />
acting fentanyl formulations (such as the<br />
oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate lozenge<br />
and the fentanyl buccal tablet), and<br />
analogues (such as intranasal alfentanil),<br />
specifically developed for breakthrough<br />
pain treatment.<br />
William L, MacLeod R. Management <strong>of</strong> break-<br />
through pain in patients with cancer. Drugs<br />
2008;68:913–924. Corresponding author:<br />
L. William. Email: leeroy.william@waitemat-<br />
adhb.govt.nz<br />
Thiazide diuretics ‘justifiable’<br />
for hypertension in patients<br />
with pre-diabetes<br />
This article, part <strong>of</strong> a series exploring<br />
uncertainties in clinical practice, considers<br />
whether diuretics are appropriate<br />
antihypertensive agents for patients<br />
with pre-diabetes. <strong>The</strong> ALLHAT 2002<br />
trial provides the basis for this clinical<br />
uncertainty, having reported an increase<br />
in cardiac risk factors, including<br />
development <strong>of</strong> diabetes, as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment with the thiazide-like diuretic<br />
chlortalidone. A Japanese clinical trial<br />
(diuretics in the management <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
hypertension study; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00131846)<br />
currently<br />
underway should provide the definitive<br />
answer when it concludes in a few<br />
years. In the interim, existing evidence<br />
suggests that use <strong>of</strong> thiazide diuretics<br />
as first-line agents for hypertension in<br />
pre-diabetic patients is ‘justifiable’, especially<br />
in resource-poor settings.<br />
Arroll B, Kenealy T, CR Elley. Should we pre-<br />
scribe diuretics for patients with prediabetes<br />
and hypertension? BMJ 2008;337:a679. Cor-<br />
responding author: B. Arroll. Email: b.arroll@<br />
auckland.ac.nz<br />
Mobile phone cameras have potential<br />
for triage in rural practice<br />
A study designed to assess population<br />
access and clinical usefulness <strong>of</strong> mobile<br />
phone cameras has shown the potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> such technology for triaging afterhours<br />
care. <strong>The</strong> study was conducted<br />
among 480 patients in two rural primary<br />
care practices in NZ. Mobile phone cameras<br />
were found to be widely available,<br />
with most patients open to the idea <strong>of</strong><br />
their use for medical triaging. Clinical<br />
utility was tested by quizzing 30 health<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals using photographs <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
primary care cases. <strong>The</strong> photographs<br />
used were taken on a standard mobile<br />
phone (Motorola v 360 with an integrated<br />
camera and 4 x zoom). Picture resolution<br />
was 176 x 220 pixels. Images were<br />
found to increase diagnostic confidence<br />
for all but one case.<br />
Jayaraman C, Kennedy P, Dutu G, Lawrenson<br />
R. Use <strong>of</strong> mobile phone cameras for after-hours<br />
triage in primary care. J Telemed Telecare<br />
2008;14:271–274. Corresponding author:<br />
R. Lawrenson. Email: LawrensR@waikatodhb.<br />
VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 87<br />
govt.nz<br />
RESEARCH GEMS<br />
Tenosynovitis due to text messaging<br />
This brief case report draws reader attention<br />
to a new overuse condition, ‘texting<br />
tenosynovitis’. <strong>The</strong> case in question presented<br />
with tenderness over the tendons<br />
<strong>of</strong> extensor pollicis brevis and abductor<br />
pollicis longus at the wrist and distally,<br />
consistent with de Quervain’s tenosynovitis.<br />
This had developed over a 3-month<br />
period during which the right-handed<br />
student had sent about 2500 texts every<br />
month, each <strong>of</strong> about 150 characters.<br />
Two international case reports <strong>of</strong> this<br />
condition are cited by the authors and<br />
the question is raised as to whether more<br />
cases are likely, given growing ownership<br />
and use <strong>of</strong> mobile phones.<br />
Storr EF, de Vere Beavis FO, Stringer MD.<br />
Texting tenosynovitis. NZ Med J 2007;1267.<br />
Corresponding author: M. Stringer Email:<br />
mark.stringer@anatomy.otago.ac.nz
JOURNAL OF pRIMARy HEALTH CARE<br />
<strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Primary Health Care (JPHC) is a peer-reviewed journal<br />
which has replaced the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Family Physician. It is a multidisciplinary<br />
publication aimed at moving research into primary health<br />
care practice and practice into research. This includes the fields <strong>of</strong><br />
family practice, primary health care nursing and community pharmacy<br />
as well as areas such as health care delivery, health promotion, epidemiology,<br />
public health and medical sociology <strong>of</strong> interest to a primary<br />
health care provider audience.<br />
<strong>The</strong> journal publishes peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative original<br />
research, systematic reviews, papers on improving performance<br />
and short reports that are relevant to its primary health care practitioners.<br />
For the aim, scope, instructions to authors and templates for<br />
publications see www.rnzcgp.org.nz/journal-<strong>of</strong>-primary-health-care/.<br />
JPHC acts as a knowledge refinery to provide busy practitioners with<br />
up-to-date knowledge about the latest evidence and best practice.<br />
Continuing pr<strong>of</strong>essional development includes pithy summaries <strong>of</strong> the<br />
latest evidence such as Cochrane Corner, POEMS (Patient Oriented<br />
Evidence that Matters), brief synopses <strong>of</strong> guidelines and bulletins, a<br />
String <strong>of</strong> PEARLS (Practical Evidence About Real Life Situations) and<br />
Charms and Harms (evidence <strong>of</strong> effectiveness and safety <strong>of</strong> complementary<br />
and alternative medicines). JPHC includes Poumanu (treasures<br />
<strong>of</strong> Maori wisdom) and Gems <strong>of</strong> NZ Primary Health Care Research<br />
published at home and internationally.<br />
Evidence can help inform best practice. However sometimes there is no<br />
evidence available or applicable for a specific patient with his or her own<br />
set <strong>of</strong> conditions, capabilities, beliefs, expectations and social circumstances.<br />
Evidence needs to be placed in context. <strong>General</strong> practice is an<br />
art as well as a science. Quality <strong>of</strong> care lies also with the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
clinical relationship, with communication and with truly informed decision-making.<br />
JPHC publishes viewpoints, commentaries and reflections<br />
that explore areas <strong>of</strong> uncertainty on aspects <strong>of</strong> care for which there is<br />
no one right answer. Debate is stimulated by the Back to Back section<br />
where two pr<strong>of</strong>essionals present their opposing views on a topic. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
is a regular Ethics column. Letters to the Editor are welcomed.<br />
While published in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> by the <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>General</strong> Practitioners, much <strong>of</strong> this research has generic implications.<br />
Our Editorial Board comprises renowned and active primary care clinicians,<br />
clinical and scientific academics and health policy experts with<br />
both <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> and international representation.<br />
Editor<br />
Dr Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>General</strong> Practice & Primary Health Care, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland,<br />
Auckland, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>; editor@rnzcgp.org.nz<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Bruce Arroll: Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong><br />
Practice & Primary Health Care, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, NZ<br />
Dr Jo Barnes: Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, School <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, NZ<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Peter Crampton: Dean and Head <strong>of</strong> Campus, Wellington School<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medicine & Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Otago, NZ<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Tony Dowell: Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Primary<br />
Health Care & <strong>General</strong> Practice, Wellington School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Otago, NZ<br />
Dr Pat Farry: Director <strong>of</strong> Te Waipounamu Rural Health Unit, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Otago, NZ<br />
Dr Ron Janes: Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Rural Health, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>General</strong> Practice and Primary Health Care, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, NZ<br />
Dr Derelie Mangin: Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Public Health<br />
& <strong>General</strong> Practice, University <strong>of</strong> Otago, Christchurch, NZ<br />
Dr Barry Parsonson: Psychologist for NZ Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and<br />
International Consultant, UNICEF (Georgia) Training Project for Institutional<br />
Staff working with disabled children<br />
Dr Shane Reti: Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, International Program Director<br />
Clinical Informatics and CEO <strong>of</strong> Clinical Informatics Industrial<br />
Research, Harvard Medical School, USA<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Kurt Stange: Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve<br />
University, Cleveland, OH, USA and Editor, Annals <strong>of</strong> Family Medicine<br />
Dr Colin Tukuitonga: Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and CEO <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Pacific Island Affairs, Wellington, NZ<br />
Editorial assistant<br />
Please send all submissions to the Editor: editor@rnzcgp.org.nz or to<br />
the Editorial Assistant Pam Berry: editorialassistant@rnzcgp.org.nz<br />
accompanied by a covering letter as outlined at http://www.rnzcgp.<br />
org.nz/journal-<strong>of</strong>-primary-health-care/#cover<br />
Subscription or advertising queries<br />
Cherylyn Borlase, Publications Coordinator<br />
RNZCGP, PO Box 10440, Wellington 6143<br />
jphcnz@rnzcgp.org.nz<br />
<strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Primary Health Care is the <strong>of</strong>ficial journal <strong>of</strong> the RNZCGP. However, views expressed are not necessarily those <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong>, the Edi-<br />
tor, or the Editorial Board. ©<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>General</strong> Practitioners 2009. All Rights Reserved.<br />
88 VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2009 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE