19.05.2013 Views

September - October - The Recreational Aircraft Association

September - October - The Recreational Aircraft Association

September - October - The Recreational Aircraft Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Room with a view.<br />

etry on the large centerline tire.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Xtremes use an MT Propeller’s constant speed<br />

system with settings for automatic governing and full<br />

feathering. Europas typically install an Airmaster AP<br />

332 three bladed composite construction propellers<br />

with an adjustable pitch system that allows selection<br />

of these modes: Take Off, Climb, Cruise, Hold and<br />

Feather ($3,990 US). <strong>The</strong> system worked well in all<br />

modes and while it does not have a constant speed<br />

capability, none was necessary. <strong>The</strong> “hold” setting<br />

allows pilots to manually adjust the propeller rpm to<br />

a desired setting. <strong>The</strong> Europa three blade had a slimmer<br />

leading edge and my guess would be considerably<br />

better performance in terms of efficiency due to<br />

lower profile drag and a higher solidarity ratio – but I<br />

have no definitive data on this.<br />

Runway Considerations<br />

Neither type has flaps, nor do they need them for<br />

take offs with their high lift wings. With my Xtreme,<br />

one lifts the tail at 40 KIAS and levitates at 45 knots<br />

in approximately 600 feet at gross weight. <strong>The</strong> turbo<br />

versions of these motorgliders both use one hundred<br />

feet less and climb at better than 1300 fpm compared<br />

to my optimum 800 fpm – all according to manufacturer’s<br />

published data. While I find the Xtremes<br />

easily match that published data, the Europa’s take<br />

off left 1000 feet behind us and yet it yielded a rate of<br />

climb in excess of 1400 fpm. It is to be expected that<br />

the Europa should out climb the similarly turbo’d<br />

Xtreme due to its similar L/D and power while propelling<br />

a lighter gross weight. <strong>The</strong> Europa folks were<br />

obviously conservative in stating the rate of climb.<br />

When John Hurst transferred control to me after<br />

take off I lowered the nose to improve visibility and<br />

climbed at 115 mph with 550 fpm showing on the VSI<br />

as this provides an excellent cruise climb configuration.<br />

Relatively speaking, Xtremes are considerably<br />

quieter in the climb as I usually forget to turn on the<br />

electric noise canceling feature of my headset. Visibility<br />

over the nose is also much better as the fuselage<br />

sits more nose down on the wing planform with<br />

the Diamond.<br />

In Flight<br />

Levelling off at 5000 feet (far from the turbo’s optimum<br />

cruise altitude) approximately 75% cruise power<br />

and pitch were selected to provide 152 mph TAS. Control<br />

response was good with control forces increasing<br />

with speed and the harmony was good between axes<br />

and pitch stability was excellent. <strong>The</strong> Xtremes have<br />

light pitch forces but rudder and aileron are heavier.<br />

Additionally, pitch stability in my Xtreme is close to<br />

neutral at cruise power settings in the 121-128 mph<br />

<strong>September</strong> - <strong>October</strong> 2007 <strong>Recreational</strong> Flyer 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!