28.05.2013 Views

LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES AND PRO BONO DESK MANUAL 2013

LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES AND PRO BONO DESK MANUAL 2013

LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES AND PRO BONO DESK MANUAL 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED HOUSING<br />

income housing, and fair housing challenges. For more information on the crisis,<br />

consult the National Housing Law Project Green Book, HUD Housing Programs:<br />

Tenants’ Rights (4th Ed. 2012) and/or the following:<br />

• Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordiability Act of 1997, Pub. L.<br />

105-65, Title V, 111 Stat. 1343 (Oct. 27 1998), Amended Pub. L. 106-74 §<br />

531 (Oct. 20, 1999);<br />

• 42 U.S.C. § 1437f;<br />

• 24 C.F.R. Part 40;<br />

• HUD PIH NOTICE 98-34;<br />

• HUD PIH NOTICE 98-19;<br />

• HUD PIH NOTICE 99-16.<br />

4.5 STATE PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCIES LAW<br />

In Act 1188 of 1997, the Louisiana legislature adopted a comprehensive revision<br />

of La. R.S. 40:381 et seq. which purports to regulate federally funded housing<br />

programs. The law, which is extraordinarily one-sided, tries to vest broad powers<br />

and maximum discretion with public housing authorities. Many of Act 1188’s provisions<br />

appear to be unlawful because they conflict with federal housing law or<br />

the Fair Housing Act. See Thorpe v. Housing Authority of City of Durham, 393 U.S.<br />

268 (1969) (federal law binding on housing authorities and state courts). Since<br />

federal law is supreme, contrary state laws cannot authorize a housing authority<br />

to violate federal law.<br />

Housing authority actions based on R.S. 40:381 et seq. may require new<br />

advocacy strategies. A housing authority must follow its own rules even when it<br />

has discretion. Government of Virgin Islands v. Brown, 571 F.2d 767, 772 ( 3d Cir.<br />

1978); Simmons v. Block, 782 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1986). Actions that are “arbitrary”<br />

are still unlawful under R.S. 40:486. Arbitrary actions should be reviewable<br />

under the state constitutional right to judicial review.<br />

There are a few provisions in R.S. 40:381 et seq. that protect tenants. For<br />

example, R.S. 40: 456, 508-10, protect domestic violence victims from the consequences<br />

of such abuse, and tenants in general from criminals who frequent nearby<br />

apartments or the project. The best protection is found at La. R.S. 40:506(D)<br />

which prohibits housing authorities from ending assistance to tenants for lease<br />

violations based upon criminal activity when the tenant or the tenant’s family<br />

member is a victim of domestic violence.<br />

4.6 UNIFORM RELOCATION ACT ASSISTANCE FOR DISPLACED<br />

FAMILIES<br />

Demolition and large-scale “modernization” of public housing projects have<br />

resulted in the displacement and relocation of thousands of public housing residents.<br />

All too frequently, PHAs fail to notify residents of their rights under a federal<br />

law called the Uniform Relocation Act. Worse still, many PHA’s do not pay<br />

adequate relocation benefits to eligible families. To help PHAs comply with the<br />

law, they can refer to the HUD Handbook 1378 and 49 C.F.R. 24.203. Some of the<br />

benefits to which residents are entitled include:<br />

• active participation of residents in the revitalization effort;<br />

• notices clarifying a resident’s right to return;<br />

(491)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!