Stress placement; phonemes vs. allophones
Stress placement; phonemes vs. allophones
Stress placement; phonemes vs. allophones
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Phonemes <strong>vs</strong>. <strong>allophones</strong><br />
• So, a phoneme is a sound that distinguishes<br />
meaning in a language, whereas an allophone<br />
is a phonetic variant of a particular phoneme<br />
that does not affect meaning.<br />
So, how do languages differ, then?<br />
• Now, consider these words from Thai with<br />
aspirated and non‐aspirated voiceless stops:<br />
[paa] “forest” [p h aa] “to split”<br />
[tam] “to pound” [t h am] “to do”<br />
[kat] “to bite” [k h at] “to interrupt”<br />
• We know aspiration is allophonic in English,<br />
but is aspiration phonemic or allophonic in<br />
Thai?<br />
The <strong>phonemes</strong> of Classical Arabic<br />
ّمد [damm] ‘blood’ ّمض [dˁamm] ‘grouped/added’<br />
راج [dʒa:r] ‘neighbor’ راد [da:r] ‘house’<br />
رمق [qamar] ‘moon’ رمأ [ʔamara] ‘ordered’<br />
بتك [kataba] ‘he wrote’ بتاك [ka:taba] ‘corresponded with’<br />
19<br />
21<br />
23<br />
Minimal pairs<br />
• Phonemes are contrastive.They create words<br />
that differ in meaning. Allophones are not<br />
contrastive; the do not distinguish meaning.<br />
• But how do we know if two sounds are<br />
contrastive in a particular language?<br />
• Answer: Minimal pairs.<br />
• A minimal pair is two words with different<br />
meanings that are identical except for one sound<br />
that occurs in the same place in each word, e.g.,<br />
seed [sid] and seat [sit]<br />
The <strong>phonemes</strong> of Classical Arabic<br />
• Now, consider these data, and draw<br />
conclusions about the <strong>phonemes</strong> of Classical<br />
Arabic.<br />
راث [θa:r] ‘revolted’ راز [za:r] ‘visited’<br />
حنم [manaa] ‘granted’ عنم [manaʕa] ‘prevented’<br />
ةحابس [siba:ah] ‘swimming’ ةحايس [sija:ah] ‘tourism’<br />
نيت [ti:n] ‘figs’ نيط [tˁi:n] ‘mud’<br />
Emphatic vowels: Phonemes or <strong>allophones</strong>?<br />
• Let’s for convenience use the symbol [A] and [A:] to<br />
mark [a] and [a:] when they are pronounced<br />
emphatically in Arabic.<br />
رئاط [tˁA:ˁʔir] ‘bird’<br />
• Suppose that we pronounced that word as [tˁa:ʔir]<br />
instead, i.e., without spreading the emphatic feature to<br />
the vowel. Would that lead to a difference in meaning?<br />
• Actually, it does not. That means that emphatic vowels<br />
are not <strong>phonemes</strong> in Arabic; they are <strong>allophones</strong>. They<br />
are non‐contrastive, and we can actually predict where<br />
the occur in the language.<br />
20<br />
22<br />
24<br />
3/12/2012<br />
4