01.06.2013 Views

Agonal Sequences in 14 Filmed Hangings With Comments - PHI ...

Agonal Sequences in 14 Filmed Hangings With Comments - PHI ...

Agonal Sequences in 14 Filmed Hangings With Comments - PHI ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE<br />

<strong>Agonal</strong> <strong>Sequences</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>14</strong> <strong>Filmed</strong> Hang<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>With</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> on the<br />

Role of the Type of Suspension, Ischemic Habituation, and<br />

Ethanol Intoxication on the Tim<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Agonal</strong> Responses<br />

Anny Sauvageau, MD, MSc,* Romano LaHarpe, MD,† David K<strong>in</strong>g, MD,‡ Graeme Dowl<strong>in</strong>g, MD,*<br />

Sam Andrews, MD,§ Sean Kelly, MD, Cor<strong>in</strong>ne Ambrosi, MD, Jean-Pierre Guay, PhD,<br />

and Vernon J. Geberth, MS, MPS for the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Human Asphyxia<br />

Abstract: The Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Human Asphyxia has analyzed <strong>14</strong> filmed<br />

hang<strong>in</strong>gs: 9 autoerotic accidents, 4 suicides, and 1 homicide. The follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sequence of agonal responses was observed: rapid loss of consciousness <strong>in</strong><br />

10 3 seconds, mild generalized convulsions <strong>in</strong> <strong>14</strong> 3 seconds, decerebrate<br />

rigidity <strong>in</strong> 19 5 seconds, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of deep rhythmic abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory<br />

movements <strong>in</strong> 19 5 seconds, decorticate rigidity <strong>in</strong> 38 15 seconds,<br />

loss of muscle tone <strong>in</strong> 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 17 seconds 25 seconds, end of deep<br />

abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory movements <strong>in</strong> 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 51 seconds 30 seconds, and<br />

last muscle movement <strong>in</strong> 4 m<strong>in</strong>utes 12 seconds 2 m<strong>in</strong>utes 29 seconds. The<br />

type of suspension and ethanol <strong>in</strong>toxication does not seem to <strong>in</strong>fluence the<br />

tim<strong>in</strong>g of the agonal responses, whereas ischemic habituation <strong>in</strong> autoerotic<br />

practitioner might decelerate the late responses to hang<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Key Words: hang<strong>in</strong>g, asphyxia, video record<strong>in</strong>g, pathophysiology, human,<br />

ethanol<br />

(Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2010;XX: 000–000)<br />

Hang<strong>in</strong>g is a form of asphyxia characterized by a constriction of the<br />

neck by a ligature tightened by the gravitational weight of the body<br />

or part of the body. 1 Death has traditionally been attributed to 3 possible<br />

mechanisms: closure of the blood vessels of the neck, compression of<br />

the air passages, and vagal stimulation by pressure on the baroreceptors<br />

<strong>in</strong> the carotid s<strong>in</strong>uses and the carotid body. 2–4 This explanation of the<br />

mechanism of death is largely based on old writ<strong>in</strong>gs and experimentation<br />

from the end of the 19th century and beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the 20th. 5 Apart<br />

from a few animal studies that gave very limited <strong>in</strong>formation on the<br />

pathophysiology of hang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human, 6 there was slight new development<br />

on this issue until the recent studies on filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs by the<br />

Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Human Asphyxia. 7,8<br />

In a series of 8 filmed hang<strong>in</strong>g, it was demonstrated that all<br />

cases demonstrated deep rhythmic abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory movements.<br />

8 These respiratory movements were not only visualized but<br />

were also clearly audible. This fact strongly challenges the theory of<br />

the obstruction of the air passage as a mechanism of death <strong>in</strong><br />

hang<strong>in</strong>g. It could be argued, however, that hear<strong>in</strong>g breath sounds<br />

Manuscript received June 7, 2010; accepted June 22, 2010.<br />

From the *Office of the Chief Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>er, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,<br />

†Centre Universitaire Romand de Médec<strong>in</strong>e Légale—Site Genève, Unité de<br />

Médec<strong>in</strong>e Forensique, Geneva, Switzerland; ‡Regional Forensic Pathology<br />

Unit, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; §Office of the<br />

Chief Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>er, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Office of the Chief<br />

Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>er, Jamaica, NY; School of Crim<strong>in</strong>ology, Faculty of Arts and<br />

Sciences, University of Montréal and Montreal Philippe-P<strong>in</strong>el Institute, Montreal,<br />

Quebec, Canada; and **P.H.I. Investigative Consultant Inc, Garnerville,<br />

NY.<br />

Correspondence: Anny Sauvageau, MD, MSc, Office of the Chief Medical<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>er, 7007, 116 St, Edmonton, Alberta T6H 5R8, Canada. E-mail:<br />

anny.sauvageau@gmail.com.<br />

Copyright © 2010 by Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams & Wilk<strong>in</strong>s<br />

ISSN: 0195-7910/10/0000-0001<br />

DOI: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181efba3a<br />

does not elim<strong>in</strong>ate the possibility of a partial airway obstruction.<br />

Although it is now clear that tracheal occlusion is not complete <strong>in</strong><br />

some hang<strong>in</strong>gs, it would be premature to totally exclude some<br />

implication of partial airways obstruction <strong>in</strong> the mechanism of death<br />

<strong>in</strong> all hang<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Besides the presence of clear audible respiration <strong>in</strong> some<br />

cases, the study of filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs has also documented the sequence<br />

of agonal responses <strong>in</strong> these deaths 8 : a rapid loss of consciousness<br />

after 8 to 18 seconds, closely followed by convulsions at<br />

10 to 19 seconds, then a complex pattern of decerebrate rigidity and<br />

decorticate rigidity, a loss of muscle tone after 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 38 seconds<br />

to 2 m<strong>in</strong>ute 15 seconds, and isolated body movements until the last<br />

movements between 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 2 seconds and 7 m<strong>in</strong>ute 31 seconds.<br />

The description of this agonal sequence constitutes a major advance<br />

<strong>in</strong> the understand<strong>in</strong>g of the pathophysiology of human hang<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Nevertheless, additional cases are needed before we can pretend to<br />

fully grasp the agonic sequence <strong>in</strong> hang<strong>in</strong>g deaths and appreciate its<br />

variability. This fact was recently emphasized by the report of an<br />

unusual case of hang<strong>in</strong>g without decerebrate or decorticate rigidity. 9<br />

In this film of a hang<strong>in</strong>g with complete suspension of the body, a<br />

52-year-old man stepped off a stool and the movement of the body<br />

stepp<strong>in</strong>g off the stool created a rotary movement around the ceil<strong>in</strong>g’s<br />

r<strong>in</strong>g. Apart from the roll<strong>in</strong>g around the ceil<strong>in</strong>g’s r<strong>in</strong>g, the body<br />

stayed motionless for the duration of the movie, without any evidence<br />

of decerebrate or decorticate rigidity. A possible elucidation<br />

of this s<strong>in</strong>gularity was proposed: the particular revolv<strong>in</strong>g movement<br />

of the body around the ceil<strong>in</strong>g’s r<strong>in</strong>g created a vestibular stimulation<br />

that <strong>in</strong>terfered with the development of the decerebrate rigidity. 9<br />

Here we present 5 additional filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs, rais<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

number of filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs studied to <strong>14</strong>.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

For each video, we evaluated the time frame of the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

body responses: loss of consciousness, convulsions, decorticate<br />

rigidity, decerebrate rigidity, loss of muscle tone, last muscle movement,<br />

and respiratory responses. All record<strong>in</strong>g were evaluated<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>tly by at least 2 judges, one of the judges hav<strong>in</strong>g seen all the<br />

videos.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Human Asphyxia has compiled and<br />

analyzed <strong>14</strong> filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs: 9 autoerotic accidents, 4 suicides, and<br />

1 homicide. All victims were adults. Most were white males, with<br />

the exception of an Asiatic male (case 9) and a white female (case<br />

11). A brief description of each case and the observed agonal<br />

sequence are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The time to the various responses<br />

is assessed consider<strong>in</strong>g time zero to represent the onset of the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

hang<strong>in</strong>g. In case <strong>14</strong>, however, the victim tied the ligature very tightly<br />

2 seconds before the hang<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> this case, the time estimates<br />

were done consider<strong>in</strong>g time 0 to be the tighten<strong>in</strong>g of the ligature.<br />

Am J Forensic Med Pathol Volume XX, Number X, XXX 2010 www.amjforensicmedic<strong>in</strong>e.com | 1


Sauvageau et al Am J Forensic Med Pathol Volume XX, Number X, XXX 2010<br />

TABLE 1. <strong>Agonal</strong> Responses <strong>in</strong> <strong>14</strong> <strong>Filmed</strong> Hang<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Respiratory<br />

Movement Responses<br />

Responses (Very<br />

Deep Respiratory<br />

Decorticate Loss of Last Attempt)<br />

Loss of<br />

Decerebrate Decorticate Rigidity 2 Muscle Muscle<br />

No Circumstances Type of Suspension Toxicology Consciousness Convulsions Rigidity Rigidity 1 (and 3) Tone Movement Start End<br />

1 Suicide Incomplete; Feet on the No <strong>in</strong>toxication 13 s 15 s 19 s 21 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 11 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 38 s 4 m<strong>in</strong> 10 s 20 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 00 s<br />

ground<br />

2 Autoerotic Incomplete; feet on the No <strong>in</strong>toxication Nd <strong>14</strong> s 19 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 08 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 32 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 15 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 47 s 21 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 03 s<br />

ground<br />

3 Autoerotic Complete No <strong>in</strong>toxication 18 s 19 s 21 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 00 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 04 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 04 s 3 m<strong>in</strong> 01 s 22 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 04 s<br />

4* Suicide Incomplete; kneel<strong>in</strong>g on No <strong>in</strong>toxication Nd 18 s Nd Nd Nd Nd Nd 24 s Nd<br />

the ground<br />

5 Autoerotic Incomplete; almost<br />

Nd 10 s 13 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 19 s 59 s — 1 m<strong>in</strong> 52 s 7 m<strong>in</strong> 31 s 13 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 05 s<br />

completely ly<strong>in</strong>g down<br />

<strong>in</strong> a prone position<br />

6 Autoerotic Incomplete; feet on the<br />

Nd 8 s 11 s 31 s 33 s — — 1 m<strong>in</strong> 02 s 19 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 02 s<br />

ground<br />

7 Autoerotic Incomplete, feet on the<br />

Nd 10 s 10 s 11 s 26 s 34 s Nd<br />

ground<br />

†<br />

Nd †<br />

13 s Nd †<br />

8 Autoerotic Incomplete; feet on the No <strong>in</strong>toxication 12 s <strong>14</strong> s 20 s 31 s — Nd<br />

ground<br />

†<br />

Nd †<br />

16 s Nd †<br />

9 ‡<br />

Suicide Complete Ethanol 10 mg/100 mL Nd Nd — — — — — Nd Nd<br />

<strong>in</strong> the femoral blood<br />

10 Autoerotic Seems <strong>in</strong>complete; feet No <strong>in</strong>toxication 8 s 12 s 20 s 24 s 39 s (and 1 2 m<strong>in</strong> 45 s 7 m<strong>in</strong> 35 s 16 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 37 s<br />

probably on the<br />

m<strong>in</strong> 55 s)<br />

ground<br />

11 Suicide Incomplete; feet on the No <strong>in</strong>toxication 8 s 11 s Nd<br />

ground<br />

§<br />

43 s 57 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 25 s 3 m<strong>in</strong> 15 s 32 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 15 s<br />

12 <br />

Homicide <br />

Incomplete, feet on the Ethanol 156 mg/100 mL 9 s Nd 16 s Nd Nd Nd Nd Nd Nd<br />

ground<br />

<strong>in</strong> the femoral<br />

blood**; THC 6.5 ng/<br />

mL <strong>in</strong> the femoral<br />

blood<br />

13 Autoerotic Complete Nd 10 s 15 s 22 s 39 s 50 s (and 1 m<strong>in</strong> 53 s Nd 17 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 43 s<br />

57 s)<br />

<strong>14</strong> Autoerotic Incomplete, feet on the<br />

Nd 8 s 11 s <strong>14</strong> s 35 s 45 s (and 1 m<strong>in</strong> 42 s Nd<br />

ground<br />

53 s)<br />

†<br />

Nd ††<br />

Nd ††<br />

*The film obta<strong>in</strong>ed from a surveillance camera was not of optimal quality and several responses are difficult to assess.<br />

† A few copies of films have been cut to early to allow evaluation of the late responses.<br />

‡ 9 There was no decerebrate or decorticate rigidities <strong>in</strong> this case (the case was published as a case report, ).<br />

§ At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the hang<strong>in</strong>g, both arms are bent with the f<strong>in</strong>gers slide between the ligature and the neck. The decerebrate rigidity is not seen probably because of this restriction limb movement. Later, the right f<strong>in</strong>gers<br />

slip from the ligature and decorticate rigidity is seen.<br />

Several body responses are difficult to assess because the victim is <strong>in</strong> the shadow.<br />

An erotic asphyxia practitioner asked for the help of his spouse <strong>in</strong> his practice. He was hang<strong>in</strong>g himself and <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g her when to stop the process. On a filmed hang<strong>in</strong>g, she was seen to ignore his sign to stop the hang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2 | www.amjforensicmedic<strong>in</strong>e.com © 2010 Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams & Wilk<strong>in</strong>s<br />

and let him die.<br />

**The victim is seen consum<strong>in</strong>g several beers at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the film, before the hang<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

†† The respiratory attempt are seen but the tim<strong>in</strong>g was difficult to assess because of the angle of the camera.<br />

Nd <strong>in</strong>dicates no data; —, not observed.


Am J Forensic Med Pathol Volume XX, Number X, XXX 2010 <strong>Agonal</strong> <strong>Sequences</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>14</strong> <strong>Filmed</strong> Hang<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Loss of consciousness was largely assessed by a close exam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of the victim’s face, voluntary movements, and body tonus.<br />

In 3 cases (cases 2, 4, and 9), loss of consciousness was not possible<br />

to evaluate: <strong>in</strong> case 2, the victim’s face was masked with underwear;<br />

<strong>in</strong> case 4, image quality from the surveillance camera was not<br />

optimal enough to estimate this issue adequately; <strong>in</strong> case 9, the onset<br />

of the loss of consciousness and of convulsions was not clearly<br />

identifiable. In all the other cases, a rapid loss of consciousness was<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> 8 to 18 seconds (average, 10 3 seconds). The loss of<br />

consciousness was closely followed by mild generalized, tonicclonic<br />

convulsions <strong>in</strong> 10 to 19 seconds (average, <strong>14</strong> 3 seconds).<br />

Decerebrate rigidity then followed. This postural attitude of<br />

marked extensor rigidity is characterized by a full extension of the<br />

upper and lower limbs, with extension of the hips and knees,<br />

adduction of the legs, <strong>in</strong>ternal rotation of the shoulders, extension of<br />

the elbows, hyperpronation of the distal parts of the upper limbs with<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ger extension at the metacarpophalangeal jo<strong>in</strong>ts, and flexion at the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terphalangeal jo<strong>in</strong>ts. This extensor postur<strong>in</strong>g was observed <strong>in</strong> 11<br />

seconds to 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 19 seconds (average, 25 19 seconds). If we<br />

exclude the only case <strong>in</strong> which decorticate rigidity preceded<br />

decerebrate rigidity (case 5), the postur<strong>in</strong>g occurred <strong>in</strong> an average of<br />

19 5 seconds.<br />

After the decerebrate rigidity, a decorticate rigidity occurred:<br />

this postural attitude is characterized by marked extensor rigidity of<br />

the legs, identical to the one observed <strong>in</strong> decerebrate rigidity, but<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with rigidity of the flexors of the arms: the arms are flexed<br />

and bent on the chest, with the hands clenched <strong>in</strong>to fists. A first<br />

phase of decorticate rigidity was relatively sudden and quick. It was<br />

generally followed by a second and sometimes a third phases of<br />

decorticate rigidity, these subsequent ones develop<strong>in</strong>g more slowly<br />

and be<strong>in</strong>g more susta<strong>in</strong>ed. The first decorticate rigidity appeared <strong>in</strong><br />

21 seconds to 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 8 seconds (average, 40 16 seconds). If we<br />

exclude case 5, the postur<strong>in</strong>g first beg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> an average of 38 15<br />

seconds.<br />

Between 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 38 seconds and 2 m<strong>in</strong>utes 45 seconds<br />

(average, 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 17 seconds 25 seconds), the body lost its<br />

muscle tone and became progressively flaccid. Subsequently, isolated<br />

body movements were observed from time to time, the last one<br />

occurr<strong>in</strong>g between 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 2 seconds and 7 m<strong>in</strong>utes 35 seconds<br />

(average, 4 m<strong>in</strong>utes 12 seconds 2 m<strong>in</strong>utes 29 seconds).<br />

As for the respiratory responses, deep rhythmic abdom<strong>in</strong>al<br />

respiratory movements were seen These respiratory movements,<br />

with rhythmic rock<strong>in</strong>g of the body by the contraction of the diaphragm,<br />

started between 13 and 32 seconds (average, 19 5<br />

seconds) and stopped between 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 2 seconds and 2 m<strong>in</strong>utes 37<br />

seconds (average, 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute 51 seconds 30 seconds). It is worth<br />

emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g that these respiratory movements were not only seen<br />

but also heard when sound was available, confirm<strong>in</strong>g the passage of<br />

air <strong>in</strong> the airways despite the hang<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Despite the great diversity of hang<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this study,<br />

the similarity between most cases is strik<strong>in</strong>g. The agonic sequence<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> hang<strong>in</strong>g is summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 2. This study provides<br />

a comprehensive portrait of the pathophysiology of human hang<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The Role of the Type of Suspension on the Tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>Agonal</strong> Responses<br />

A comparison of time delay for agonal responses <strong>in</strong> complete<br />

suspension (cases 3 and 13) and <strong>in</strong>complete suspension (cases 1–2,<br />

4–8, 10–12, <strong>14</strong>) do not reveal impressive differences. However, the<br />

small number of cases <strong>in</strong> the complete suspension group precludes<br />

statistical analyses. These prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results suggest that the type of<br />

suspension may not be an important factor <strong>in</strong> the tim<strong>in</strong>g of agonal<br />

TABLE 2. <strong>Agonal</strong> Sequence <strong>in</strong> Hang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Loss of consciousness<br />

Average Time<br />

10 3s<br />

Convulsions <strong>14</strong> 3s<br />

Decerebrate rigidity 19 5s<br />

Stat of deep rhythmic abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory<br />

movements<br />

19 5s<br />

Decorticate rigidity 38 15 s<br />

Loss of muscle tone 1 m<strong>in</strong> 17 s 25 s<br />

End of deep rhythmic abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory<br />

movements<br />

1 m<strong>in</strong> 51 s 30 s<br />

Last muscle movement 4 m<strong>in</strong> 12 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 29 s<br />

TABLE 3. Tim<strong>in</strong>g of the <strong>Agonal</strong> Responses: Comparison of<br />

Autoerotic Hang<strong>in</strong>gs Versus Nonautoerotic Hang<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Autoerotic Hang<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Nonautoerotic<br />

Hang<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Loss of consciousness 11 3s 103s Convulsions 13 3s 154s Decerebrate rigidity 20 6s 182s Stat of deep rhythmic<br />

abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory<br />

movements<br />

17 3s* 256s* Decorticate rigidity 40 16 s 32 16 s<br />

Loss of muscle tone 2 m<strong>in</strong> 5 s 23 s* 1 m<strong>in</strong> 31 s 9s*<br />

End of deep rhythmic<br />

abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory<br />

movements<br />

1 m<strong>in</strong> 56 s 31 s 1 m<strong>in</strong> 38 s 32 s<br />

Last muscle movement 4 m<strong>in</strong> 23 s 2 m<strong>in</strong> 59 s 3 m<strong>in</strong> 42 s 39 s<br />

*Comparisons between both groups us<strong>in</strong>g Mann-Whitney U were significant at P <br />

0.05.<br />

responses and therefore <strong>in</strong> the time to irreversible damage and death.<br />

Further cases are needed to assess the validity of this observation.<br />

In the present study, most cases of <strong>in</strong>complete hang<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>in</strong><br />

an upright position with feet on the ground, with only 1 case of<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete hang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a kneel<strong>in</strong>g position (case 4) and one case of<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete hang<strong>in</strong>g ly<strong>in</strong>g down (case 5). By compar<strong>in</strong>g the tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of responses <strong>in</strong> these cases, there is no evidence that the position of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete suspension <strong>in</strong>terferes with the time delay. Further cases<br />

are needed to assess the validity of this prelim<strong>in</strong>ary statement. It<br />

should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out, however that the only case with an <strong>in</strong>version<br />

of the sequence of decerebrate and decorticate rigidity is the case <strong>in</strong><br />

a ly<strong>in</strong>g down position (case 5). It is unknown at this time if this<br />

position plays a role <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>version of the sequence.<br />

The Role of Ischemic Habituation on the Tim<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>Agonal</strong> Responses<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g that autoerotic practitioners might develop over<br />

time a certa<strong>in</strong> ischemic habituation, it is theoretically possible that these<br />

cases present a deceleration of the sequence. In contrast, as they often<br />

play for a longer period with the hang<strong>in</strong>g process before the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

hang<strong>in</strong>g, it could be argue that on the contrary, their hang<strong>in</strong>g sequence<br />

will be accelerated. A comparison of the tim<strong>in</strong>g of agonal responses <strong>in</strong><br />

autoerotic hang<strong>in</strong>gs versus nonautoerotic hang<strong>in</strong>gs is presented <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

3. Overall, the time delays for the early responses to hang<strong>in</strong>g seem to be<br />

relatively similar between both groups, with the exception of an accelerated<br />

start of deep abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory movements <strong>in</strong> the autoerotic<br />

practitioners. As for the late responses to hang<strong>in</strong>g, they seem to be<br />

© 2010 Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams & Wilk<strong>in</strong>s www.amjforensicmedic<strong>in</strong>e.com | 3


Sauvageau et al Am J Forensic Med Pathol Volume XX, Number X, XXX 2010<br />

decelerated <strong>in</strong> autoerotic practitioners. Statistical analysis confirmed a<br />

significant difference between both groups for 2 variables: the start of<br />

the deep abdom<strong>in</strong>al respiratory abdom<strong>in</strong>al movement occurred significantly<br />

faster <strong>in</strong> autoerotic practitioner whereas the loss of muscle tone<br />

was significantly delayed. Further research is needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

whether and under which circumstances ischemic habituation plays a<br />

role on the agonal sequences.<br />

The Role of Ethanol Intoxication on the Tim<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>Agonal</strong> Responses<br />

An expert-witness recently stated that a victim <strong>in</strong>toxicated by<br />

ethanol will die more quickly from strangulation than a sober victim,<br />

alleg<strong>in</strong>g that ethanol is a respiratory depressant. We could not f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

any animal or human studies to support or refute this theory. In the<br />

present study, 1 victim was <strong>in</strong>toxicated with ethanol (case 12). This<br />

<strong>in</strong>toxication state does not seem to have accelerated the tim<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

agonal responses. It would be <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to further evaluate the<br />

effect of ethanol on the tim<strong>in</strong>g of agonal responses to hang<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

animal model of hang<strong>in</strong>g previously proposed by Boghossian et al. 6<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Sauvageau A, Boghossian E. Classification of asphyxia: the need for standardization.<br />

J Forensic Sci. In press.<br />

2. DiMaio VJ, DiMaio D. Asphyxia Forensic Pathology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL:<br />

CRC Press; 2001:229–277.<br />

3. Spitz WU. Asphyxia. In: Spitz WU, Spitz DJ, eds. Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal<br />

Investigation of Death: Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the Application of Pathology to<br />

Crime Investigation. 4th ed. Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD;<br />

2006:783–845.<br />

4. Saukko P, Knight B. Suffocation and “Asphyxia.” In: Saukko P, Knight B, eds.<br />

Knight’s Forensic Pathology. 3rd ed. London, England: Arnold Publishers;<br />

2004:352–367.<br />

5. Clement R, Redpath M, Sauvageau A. Cause of death <strong>in</strong> hang<strong>in</strong>g: a historical<br />

review of the evolution of pathophysiological hypotheses. J Forensic Sci. In<br />

press.<br />

6. Boghossian E, Clement R, Sauvageau A. Respiratory, circulatory and neurological<br />

responses to asphyxia by hang<strong>in</strong>g: a review of animal models.<br />

J Forensic Sci. In press.<br />

7. Sauvageau A. <strong>Agonal</strong> sequences <strong>in</strong> four filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs: analysis of respiratory<br />

and movement responses to asphyxia by hang<strong>in</strong>g. J Forensic Sci. 2009;<br />

54:192–194.<br />

8. Sauvageau A, LaHarpe R, Geberth VJ; The Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Human<br />

Asphyxia. <strong>Agonal</strong> sequences <strong>in</strong> eight filmed hang<strong>in</strong>gs: analysis of respiratory<br />

and movement responses to asphyxia by hang<strong>in</strong>g. J Forensic Sci. In<br />

press.<br />

9. Sauvageau A, Kelly S, Ambrosi C. A filmed hang<strong>in</strong>g without decerebrate and<br />

decorticate rigidity: a case report and pathophysiological considerations. In<br />

press.<br />

4 | www.amjforensicmedic<strong>in</strong>e.com © 2010 Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams & Wilk<strong>in</strong>s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!