The Intercultural cities INDEX
The Intercultural cities INDEX
The Intercultural cities INDEX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Intercultural</strong> <strong>cities</strong> <strong>INDEX</strong>
Why an ICC <strong>INDEX</strong>?<br />
Illustrate the concept<br />
Why an ICC <strong>INDEX</strong>?
Why an ICC <strong>INDEX</strong>?<br />
Facilitate policy review
Why an ICC <strong>INDEX</strong>?<br />
Enable benchlearning
Why an ICC <strong>INDEX</strong>?<br />
Monitor progress and research
<strong>The</strong> process of <strong>INDEX</strong><br />
development
<strong>INDEX</strong> content<br />
Based on the elements of the ICC strategy<br />
<strong>INDEX</strong> content
Normative basis<br />
• European normative texts<br />
• Research findings<br />
• City practice<br />
Normative basis
<strong>INDEX</strong> results<br />
On-line interactive graphs<br />
<strong>INDEX</strong> results
<strong>INDEX</strong> results<br />
An analytical report with recommendations<br />
and good practice examples for each city
<strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities: Indicators<br />
Area Subjects No. of indicators<br />
Commitment Public statement, city strategy, city action plan, budget,<br />
communication (speeches, webpage)<br />
<strong>Intercultural</strong> lens Education system, residential neighbourhoods, public services,<br />
business and labour market, cultural and civil life, public space<br />
Mediation and conflict<br />
resolution<br />
Professional service for mediation, sort of mediation<br />
Organisation inter-religious relations<br />
Language Cities` provision of language courses; Financial support, image<br />
of migrant languages<br />
Relations with the local<br />
media<br />
Open and international<br />
outlook<br />
Intelligence and<br />
competence<br />
Positive image, city’s information service, support for journalists<br />
with minority background, city monitor<br />
Policy for international co-operation,<br />
Financial provision, agency, students & city life, economic<br />
relations with countries of origin of its migrant groups<br />
Information, surveys, intercultural competence of its officials 3<br />
Welcoming new arrivals Agency, city-specific package, different groups, public ceremony<br />
to greet newcomers<br />
Governance and<br />
leadership<br />
Right to vote, elected politicians and voters representing<br />
minorities, representing minorities schools and public services<br />
9<br />
30<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
6<br />
4<br />
4
<strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities: Importance<br />
Area Mean<br />
1. Commitment to being an intercultural city 8.57<br />
2. How intercultural is the education system? 8.00<br />
3. How intercultural are residential neighbourhoods? 6.86<br />
4. How intercultural are the public services? 6.57<br />
5. How intercultural is business and the labour market? 7.14<br />
6. How intercultural is cultural and civil life? 7.71<br />
7. How intercultural is public space? 6.86<br />
8. Mediation and conflict resolution 7.71<br />
9. Language 8.00<br />
10. Relations with local media 6.71<br />
11. International relations 5.14<br />
12. <strong>Intercultural</strong> intelligence and competence 7.71<br />
13. Welcoming new arrivals 7.29<br />
14. Governance, leadership and citizenship 9.00<br />
Note: 10 = most important<br />
Source: <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2010
<strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Index<br />
100 = best value<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Note: Scores<br />
Source: <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
<strong>Intercultural</strong> City Index<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
Oslo<br />
Zürich<br />
Dublin<br />
Barcelona<br />
Sabadell<br />
Copenhagen<br />
Duisburg<br />
Västerås<br />
San Sebastian<br />
München<br />
Turnhout<br />
Turnhout<br />
Amadora<br />
Tilburg<br />
Fuenlabrada<br />
Lisbon<br />
Patras<br />
Cartagena
<strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Index<br />
100 = best value<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
Oslo<br />
Note: Scores<br />
Source: <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2010<br />
Relations with the local media<br />
Patras<br />
Sabadell<br />
Dublin<br />
San Sebastian<br />
Lisbon<br />
Duisburg<br />
Barcelona<br />
Turnhout<br />
Zürich<br />
Västerås<br />
Tilburg<br />
Fuenlabrada<br />
Amadora<br />
Copenhagen<br />
München<br />
Cartagena
Neuchâtel:<br />
Comparison with the network<br />
IX. Welcoming new arrivals<br />
X. Governance<br />
VII./VIII.<br />
Intelligence/competence<br />
VI. An open and<br />
international outlook<br />
Note: Scores: 100 best value<br />
Source: <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
I. Commitment<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Neuchâtel City sample<br />
II. <strong>Intercultural</strong> lens<br />
III. Mediation and conflict<br />
resolution<br />
IV. Language<br />
V. Relations with the local<br />
media
Share of immigrants<br />
Relation of share of immigrants<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
r=0.67<br />
Cartagena<br />
Fuenlabrada<br />
Lisbon<br />
Note: N=19<br />
Source: <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
and ICC-Index<br />
Zurich<br />
München<br />
Oslo<br />
Gothenburg<br />
Dublin<br />
Västeras Barcelona<br />
Copenhagen<br />
Duisburg Sabadell<br />
Turnhout<br />
Amadora<br />
San Sebastian<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
ICC-Index
GDP per capita (in EUR)<br />
Relation of economic success<br />
95'000<br />
85'000<br />
75'000<br />
65'000<br />
55'000<br />
45'000<br />
35'000<br />
25'000<br />
15'000<br />
5'000<br />
r=0.61<br />
Note: N=19<br />
Source: <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
and ICC-Index<br />
München<br />
Gothenburg<br />
Copenhagen<br />
Västeras<br />
Dublin<br />
Tilburg<br />
San Sebastian<br />
Barcelona<br />
Lisbon Turnhout<br />
Cartagena<br />
Duisburg<br />
Patras Amadora<br />
Sabadell<br />
Fuenlabrada<br />
Oslo<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
ICC-Index
Relation of feeling of safety and<br />
Feeling of safety (in %)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
r=0.71<br />
Lisbon<br />
Fuenlabrada<br />
Cartagena<br />
Patras<br />
Note: N=19<br />
Source: ESS 2010; <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
ICC-Index<br />
Tilburg<br />
München<br />
Gothenburg<br />
Copenhagen Zurich<br />
Västeras<br />
Oslo<br />
Turnhout San Sebastian<br />
Duisburg<br />
Amadora<br />
Sabadell<br />
Dublin<br />
Barcelona<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
ICC-Index
Relation of PISA and ICC-Index<br />
PISA scores Maths immigrant children<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
r=0.57<br />
Note: N=19<br />
Source: PISA 2009; <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
Dublin<br />
Tilburg<br />
Zurich<br />
Gothenburg<br />
München Västeras<br />
Copenhagen<br />
Cartagena<br />
Patras<br />
Fuenlabrada<br />
Lisbon<br />
Oslo<br />
Duisburg<br />
Turnhout<br />
Barcelona<br />
San Sebastian<br />
Sabadell<br />
Amadora<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
ICC-Index (in %)
Reported Discrimination<br />
Relation of Discrimination and<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
-2<br />
-4<br />
-6<br />
-8<br />
-10<br />
r=-0.63<br />
Cartagena<br />
München<br />
ICC-Index-Media<br />
Copenhagen<br />
Tilburg<br />
Amadora<br />
Note: N=19<br />
Source: PISA 2009; <strong>Intercultural</strong> Cities Project, CoE 2011<br />
Lisbon<br />
Duisburg Dublin<br />
Sabadell<br />
Neuchâtel<br />
Fuenlabrada Västeras Oslo<br />
Barcelona<br />
San Sebastian<br />
Turnhout<br />
Zurich<br />
Patras<br />
Gothenburg<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120<br />
ICC-Relation w ith m edia-Index
Questions for discussion<br />
Are all indicators relevant? Are there other indicators that are more relevant?<br />
How useful is the <strong>INDEX</strong> for <strong>cities</strong>? How can it be made more useful? Use in<br />
relation to policy analysis, strategy development and communication<br />
Frequency of updates<br />
Beyond measuring policy input: monitoring public opinion
Change language