01.06.2013 Views

Elisabeth Austin PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Elisabeth Austin PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Elisabeth Austin PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

descendants. It remains the fullest source for Thomas' family<br />

history. The inquest into the temporalities <strong>of</strong> Bayeux commissioned<br />

by Henry I after the death <strong>of</strong> Richard fitz-Samson in 1133<br />

supplements the chapter's records, and like the Livre Noirdocuments<br />

the ineffectual administration <strong>of</strong> Thomas' nephew. 33 Outside <strong>of</strong><br />

Bayeux, the archives hold little information concerning Thomas, with<br />

one striking exception: a charter <strong>of</strong> jumieges testifies to Thomas'<br />

early patronage by William 1. Norman cartularies can tell us little<br />

about Thomas' very occasional presence on the continent in the<br />

company <strong>of</strong> his king.<br />

Written sources tell us a great deal about Thomas' character<br />

and actions, but a more enduring monument to his work exists. The<br />

outline <strong>of</strong> York's Anglo-Norman Minster survives in the undercr<strong>of</strong>t <strong>of</strong><br />

the present church, and the footings Thomas commissioned continue<br />

to support the late-medieval tower. Thirty years <strong>of</strong> excavations, now<br />

complete, reveal the scale <strong>of</strong> Thomas' building campaign and suggest<br />

the aspirations which dictated it.<br />

In the end, then, a biographer <strong>of</strong> Thomas <strong>of</strong> Bayeux may find<br />

ample materials to work with. If much <strong>of</strong> the ground had been<br />

trodden for purposes to which Thomas was incidental, a few sources<br />

remain to be exploited with a new intent. Thomas here will be<br />

33Gleason, pp. 68-9, summarizes the transmission <strong>of</strong> the 1133 returns: the<br />

originals, a copy in a register <strong>of</strong> 1297, and a seventeenth-century transcript<br />

are all lost. A nineteenth-century transcript <strong>of</strong> a second seventeenth-century<br />

transcript <strong>of</strong> the 1297 copy survives, but the version <strong>of</strong> the inquest in the Red<br />

Book <strong>of</strong> the Exchequer ( RS 1896, ii, pp. 645-7) is regarded as more reliable. See<br />

J.H. Round, Family Origins and Other <strong>St</strong>udies, ed. W. Page (London, 1930), pp.<br />

201-16, and Haskins, Norman Institutions, pp. 15-20. H. Navel compares the<br />

versions <strong>of</strong> the inquest and reproduces the text, corrected from Delisle, in<br />

"L'enquete de 1133 sur les fiefs de l'eveche de Bayeux", BSAN 42 (1935), pp. 5-<br />

80. The index alone <strong>of</strong> this painstaking critical edition runs to nine pages.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!