01.06.2013 Views

Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Damus</strong>-<strong>Kaye</strong>-<strong>Stanzel</strong> <strong>vs</strong><br />

<strong>Bulboventricular</strong> <strong>Foramen</strong><br />

<strong>resection</strong><br />

Emile Bacha, MD<br />

Director, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery<br />

Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York-Presbyterian<br />

Columbia University Medical Center


Frame the problem<br />

• Tricuspid atresia with d-TGA<br />

• DILV (S,L,L)<br />

• Rare forms of single V, unrestricted<br />

pulmonary blood flow and<br />

subaortic systemic obstruction


Lets agree on a few principles<br />

1. Surgical strategy largely determined by:<br />

– BVF<br />

– Semilunar valves<br />

– (aortic arch)


Lets agree on a few principles<br />

1. Surgical strategy largely determined by:<br />

– BVF<br />

– Semilunar valves<br />

– (aortic arch)<br />

2. BVF <strong>resection</strong> is not applicable during neonatal<br />

period (exposure, friable tissue)


Lets agree on a few principles<br />

1. Surgical strategy largely determined by:<br />

– BVF<br />

– Semilunar valves<br />

– (aortic arch)<br />

2. BVF <strong>resection</strong> is not applicable during neonatal<br />

period (exposure, friable tissue)<br />

Therefore, if subAS (restrictive BVF) is severe<br />

enough to warrant <strong>resection</strong>, then DKS/Norwood<br />

is necessary (palliative switch?)


Lets agree on a few principles<br />

1. Surgical strategy largely determined by:<br />

– BVF<br />

– Semilunar valves<br />

– (aortic arch)<br />

2. BVF <strong>resection</strong> is not applicable during neonatal period (exposure, friable<br />

tissue)<br />

Therefore, if subAS (restrictive BVF) is severe enough to warrant <strong>resection</strong>, then<br />

DKS/Norwood is necessary (palliative switch?)<br />

3. If there is aortic arch obstruction, Norwood


Does PA banding really increase the<br />

chances of restriction


How do you determine if a<br />

BVF is restrictive, or will be<br />

restrictive?


• a systemic outflow gradient at the subvalvular<br />

level


• a systemic outflow gradient at the subvalvular<br />

level<br />

or<br />

• a bulboventricular foramen/aortic valve<br />

diameter ratio of 1 or less


You are more likely to end up with obstruction if the BVF is small<br />

to begin with


If the aortic arch is obstructed, the BVF is more likely to be small


Patients WITHOUT aortic arch obstruction: patients who developed<br />

BVF obstruction had sign. smaller BVF index area


Conclusions (Matitiau et al)<br />

• Neonate with a BVF size index of < 2cm 2 /m 2<br />

are at high risk for developing BVF obstruction


What happens to the BVF even if<br />

you DON’T band the PA?


Modified Norwood Operation for Single Left<br />

Ventricle and Ventriculoarterial Discordance: An<br />

Improved Surgical Technique.<br />

Mosca, Bove et al<br />

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1126-1132


• N=20: Although the absolute bulboventricular<br />

foramen size did increase in approximately 50%<br />

of patients, this was not predictable, and when<br />

indexed to body surface area, there was an<br />

overall decrease with time (20%)


Management strategies:<br />

DKS <strong>vs</strong> BVF <strong>resection</strong> (or other non<br />

“arch” procedures)


BVF <strong>resection</strong>


BVF <strong>resection</strong><br />

• Usually in older patients who have been banded<br />

and started out with large BVFs


BVF <strong>resection</strong>:<br />

location of the conduction system<br />

Anderson R. H. et al.; Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:644-648


Technique of DKS (Norwood) in<br />

setting of d-TGA or l-TGA


Mosca et al, ATS 1997


Mosca et al, ATS 1997


Mosca et al, ATS 1997


Conclusion<br />

• For patients with single ventricle, unrestrictive<br />

pulmonary blood flow and an aorta arising from<br />

an outflow chamber connected to the main<br />

ventricle via a BVF (usually DILV/SLL or<br />

Tricuspid Atresia/d-TGA)


Conclusions<br />

• BVF size in the neonate is an important<br />

predictor of late obstruction<br />

• Neonate with a BVF size index of < 2cm2 /m2 • Neonate with a BVF size index of < 2cm2 /m2 are at high risk for developing BVF obstruction<br />

• Although the BVF appears to grow, its growth<br />

does not keep pace with somatic growth in most<br />

patients


Conclusion (management)<br />

• If there is AS or aortic arch hypoplasia:<br />

Norwood


Conclusion (management)<br />

• If there is AS or aortic arch hypoplasia:<br />

Norwood<br />

• If there is any evidence of subAS (restrictive<br />

• If there is any evidence of subAS (restrictive<br />

BVF): Norwood


Conclusion (management)<br />

• If there is AS or aortic arch hypoplasia:<br />

Norwood<br />

• If there is any evidence of subAS (restrictive<br />

BVF): Norwood<br />

• For patients with no AS/ao arch hypoplasia and<br />

large BVF, PAB may be an option (very rare!)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!