Archival and recordkeeping research

Recommendations

Info

Research Methods: Information, Systems and Contexts Bunn, J. (2011). Multiple narratives, multiple views. Observing archival description. (Doctoral thesis. University College London, UK.) Burstein, F. (2002). Systems development in information systems research. In Williamson, K. (Ed.), Research methods for students, academics and professionals: Information Management and Systems (2nd ed.) (pp. 147-158). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University. Burton, A. (Ed.). (2005). Archive stories. Facts, fictions and the writing of history. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Campt, T. (2012). Image matters. Archive, photography, and the African diaspora in Europe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Carucci, P. (1992). Archival science today. Principles, methods and results. In Oddo Bucci (Ed.), Archival science on the threshold of the Year 2000: Proceedings of the international conference, Macerata, 3-8 September, 1990 (pp. 55-68). Ancona: University of Macerata. Caswell, M. (2011). Khmer Rouge archives: Accountability, truth, and memory in Cambodia. Archival Science, 11, 25-44. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Subaltern studies and postcolonial historiography. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1(1), 9-32. Charmaz, K., & Mitchell Jr. K. G. (1997). The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance and style in ethnographic writing. In R. Hertz (Ed.) Reflexivity and voice (pp. 193-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Clever Recordkeeping Metadata Project. (n. d). http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/ research/groups/rcrg/crkm/. Cook, T. (1992). Mind over matter. Towards a new theory of archival appraisal. In B. Craig (Ed.) The archival imagination: Essays in honour of Hugh A. Taylor (pp. 38-70). Ottawa: Association of Canadian Archivists Cook, T. (1997). What is past is prologue. A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63 Cook, T. (2001a). Appraisal methodology. Macro-appraisal and functional analysis. Part A. Concepts and theory; and Part B. Guidelines for performing an archival appraisal on government records. Retrieved from www.collectionscanada.ca/ information-management/061101_e.html Cook, T. (2001b). Archival science and postmodernism. New formulations for old concepts. Archival Science, 1(1), 3-24. Cook, T. (2004). Macro-appraisal and functional analysis. Documenting governance rather than government. Journal of the Society of Archivists (UK), 25(1), 5-18. Couture, C., & Ducharme, D. (2005). Research in archival science. A status report. Archivaria, 59, 41-67. Cox, R. J. (Ed.) (2004). Lester J. Cappon and the relationship of history, archives, and scholarship in the golden age of archival theory. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists. Cox, R. J., & Wallace, D. (Eds.). (2002). Archives and the public good. Accountability and records in modern society. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books. 106
Chapter 4 – Archival and recordkeeping research Craig, B. L. (2000). Canadian archivists. What types of people are they? Archivaria, 50, 79-92. Cvetkovich, A. (2003). An archive of feelings. Trauma, sexuality, and lesbian public culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Cumming, K. (2005). Purposeful data. The roles and purposes of recordkeeping metadata. Doctoral thesis. Monash University. Daniels, M., & Yakel, E. (2010). Seek and you may find. Successful search in online finding aid systems. American Archivist, 73(2), 535-568. Day, M. (1999). Metadata for digital preservation: an update. Ariadne, 22. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/metadata/ Derrida, J. (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. E. Prenowitz, trans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Dong, L. (2011). The economics and politics of international preservation collaborations. A Malian case study. Archival Science. Duff, W. M. (1998). Harnessing the power of warrant. American Archivist, 61 (1), 88- 105. Dunbar, A.W. (2006). Introducing critical race theory to the archival discourse. Getting the conversation started. Archival Science, 6(1), 109-129. Duranti, L. (1998). Diplomatics. New uses for an old science. Lanham, MD: Society of American Archivists, Association of Canadian Archivists, and Scarecrow Press. Duranti, L. (2009). From digital diplomatics to digital records forensics. Archivaria, 68, 39-66. Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the integrity of electronic records. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing. Duranti, L., & Preston, R. (Eds.) (2008). International research on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experiential, interactive and dynamic records. Padova, Italy: Associazione Nazionale Archivistica Italiana. Retrieved from http://www.interpares.org/ip2/book.cfm. European Electronic Resource Preservation and Access Network (ERPANET). (n.d). http://www.erpanet.org/ Evans, J., McKemmish, S., & Bhoday, K. (2005). Create once, use many times. The clever use of recordkeeping metadata for multiple archival purposes. Archival Science, 5(1), 17-42. Evans, J., & Rouche, N. (2004). Utilizing systems development methods in archival systems research: Building a metadata schema registry. Archival Science, 4(3-4), 315–334. Faulkhead, S. (2009). Connecting through records: Narratives of Koorie Victoria. Archives and Manuscripts, 37(2), 60-88. Flinn, A. (2010). Independent community archives and community-generated content: Writing, saving and sharing our Hhstories. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 39-51. Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P. H. & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galleta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction 107
Page 1 and 2: Chapter 4 Chapter 4 - Archival and
Page 3 and 4: Chapter 4 - Archival and recordkeep
Page 19 and 20: Table 4.3 Adapted research methods
Page 23 and 24: Table 4.4 Archival and recordkeepin
Page 27: Chapter 4 - Archival and recordkeep

Archival and recordkeeping research

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?