02.06.2013 Views

budgetary implementation

budgetary implementation

budgetary implementation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANNEX 4: HISTORICAL TREND IN COMMITMENTS AND PAYMENTS<br />

Charts 1 and 2 illustrate the evolution of the budget and its execution from 1994 to 2012. As<br />

mentioned above, the EAGGF-G and the FIFG are included in the data, while from 2007<br />

onwards their successors, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the<br />

European Fisheries Fund, are not. On the other hand, the data now include the Cohesion Fund<br />

programmes of the 2007-2013 period, as its regulatory framework and financial management<br />

have become the same as for the Structural Funds. As before, the pre-2007 projects funded by<br />

the Cohesion Fund are excluded. Comparisons between pre-2007 years and the years from<br />

2007 onwards should therefore be treated with caution.<br />

Since the accession of ten new Member States (EU-10) in 2004, followed by Bulgaria and<br />

Romania in 2007 (EU-2), the commitments budget for the Structural Funds has increased<br />

considerably. Although the medium-term trend for payments also points upwards, the short<br />

term evolution is more irregular due to variations in payment execution especially during the<br />

start-up phase of new programmes (see also Chart 2 years 2000 until 2003).<br />

Chart 1: Commitment and payment appropriations entered in the budget from 1994 to 2012 (EUR<br />

million, including all transfers during the year but excluding amounts carried over.)<br />

- 47 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!