budgetary implementation
budgetary implementation
budgetary implementation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANNEX 4: HISTORICAL TREND IN COMMITMENTS AND PAYMENTS<br />
Charts 1 and 2 illustrate the evolution of the budget and its execution from 1994 to 2012. As<br />
mentioned above, the EAGGF-G and the FIFG are included in the data, while from 2007<br />
onwards their successors, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the<br />
European Fisheries Fund, are not. On the other hand, the data now include the Cohesion Fund<br />
programmes of the 2007-2013 period, as its regulatory framework and financial management<br />
have become the same as for the Structural Funds. As before, the pre-2007 projects funded by<br />
the Cohesion Fund are excluded. Comparisons between pre-2007 years and the years from<br />
2007 onwards should therefore be treated with caution.<br />
Since the accession of ten new Member States (EU-10) in 2004, followed by Bulgaria and<br />
Romania in 2007 (EU-2), the commitments budget for the Structural Funds has increased<br />
considerably. Although the medium-term trend for payments also points upwards, the short<br />
term evolution is more irregular due to variations in payment execution especially during the<br />
start-up phase of new programmes (see also Chart 2 years 2000 until 2003).<br />
Chart 1: Commitment and payment appropriations entered in the budget from 1994 to 2012 (EUR<br />
million, including all transfers during the year but excluding amounts carried over.)<br />
- 47 -