DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NEW YORK ... - Gudavadze
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NEW YORK ... - Gudavadze
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NEW YORK ... - Gudavadze
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>DISTRICT</strong> <strong>ATTORNEY'S</strong> <strong>OFFICE</strong><br />
<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> COUNTY<br />
IN RE: INVESTIGATIVE REFERRAL<br />
ORDER OF HONORABLE BERNARD<br />
J. FRIED, JSC<br />
Honorable Cyrus R. Vance Jr.<br />
District Attorney for New York County<br />
BRIEF PURSUANT TO REFERRAL ORDER<br />
This Brief is respectfully submitted pursuant to an Order of Hon. Bernard J. Fried, Justice<br />
of the Supreme Court of New York County, entered on April 2, 2010 (See: Appendix, p. 1), referring<br />
alleged criminal conduct of Martin Paul Russo (“RUSSO”), a New York attorney, and his client<br />
Jean-Yves Haouzi (“HAOUZI”), to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for investigation.<br />
SUMMARY<br />
As alleged in the annexed affidavits, on March 31, 2010, RUSSO and HAOUZI,<br />
accompanied by approximately twenty to thirty armed men invaded the premises of Ajna Bar<br />
(“AJNA”); threatened AJNA’s employees; broke into the safe and removed over $50,000 in cash;<br />
locked out AJNA’s legitimate management; intentionally and/or recklessly created a substantial risk<br />
of physical injury to persons present during the RUSSO/HAOUZI raid; unlawfully detained AJNA’s<br />
employees, took possession of AJNA’s property and confidential and proprietary documents;<br />
without authorization gained access to AJNA’s computers and servers containing private data; and<br />
engaged in other conduct proscribed by New York Penal Law, alleged hereinafter.<br />
AJNA (formerly Buddha Bar NYC), is an internationally acclaimed dining and entertainment<br />
establishment, regularly featured in major international media, including New York Times, New<br />
York Post, USA Today, Bloomberg News, Newsday; and many others. AJNA is operated by Little<br />
Rest Twelve, Inc., a New York Corporation (“LRT”). (LRT and AJNA are collectively referred to<br />
as “AJNA”)<br />
HAOUZI, a French National and non-resident alien is a former officer of LRT, fired in 2007<br />
for theft and fraud, and named defendant in a civil action Little Rest Twelve v. Visan, Haouzi, et al.
Index No. 600676/2007 (Justice Fried).<br />
RUSSO, a New York attorney, with the law firm of Gusrae Kaplan Bruno & Nusbaum<br />
PLLC. (“GUSRAE KAPLAN.”) appears as attorney in the Little Rest Twelve action and several<br />
related actions pending before Justice Fried.<br />
Another attorney appearing in these actions, who, together with RUSSO and HAOUZI,<br />
commanded the raid on AJNA’s premises is Sarah Khurana (“KHURANA”), also is with the law<br />
firm of GUSRAE KAPLAN.<br />
On April 1, 2010, AJNA brought the conduct of RUSSO, HAOUZI and their accomplices<br />
to the attention of Justice Fried. Upon reading the Affidavit of Nina Zajic, AJNA’s CEO, and<br />
preliminary hearing on the matter, the Court entered the Referral Order and directed the undersigned<br />
attorneys for AJNA to present this Referral to the District Attorney for New York County for<br />
investigation.<br />
RAID UPON AJNA’S PREMISES BY RUSSO, HAOUZI, ET AL.<br />
As stated in the affidavits of eyewitnesses, reproduced in the annexed Appendix, on March<br />
31, 2010, at approximately 9:00 AM, HAOUZI, RUSSO and KHURANA, accompanied by a force<br />
of twenty to thirty men armed with collapsing steel batons (collectively, the “Intruders”) broke into<br />
the premises of AJNA, at the time when AJNA was closed for business. Intruders declared that<br />
RUSSO was the “new owner” and KHURANA was of AJNA’s “new office manager”. RUSSO<br />
falsely declared to AJNA’s financial controller that he had “a Court Order and full authority to<br />
request all corp[orate] documents and access to everything on the premises.” KHURANA likewise<br />
falsely represented that “she had a signed court order” and described the armed intruders as “city<br />
marshals”.<br />
One of the employees summoned the police. However, when police arrived at the scene,<br />
RUSSO, falsely holding himself out to be the lawyer for AJNA, misrepresented to the police that<br />
he had “authority from the Court” to enter the premises and to remove its management. Based on<br />
2
RUSSO’s misrepresentations and relying on his status as New York attorney, police declined to<br />
intervene.<br />
After Police left the scene, RUSSO’s and other intruders’ conduct had become emboldened<br />
and more outrageous. Intruders threatened employees of AJNA by flashing their steel batons and<br />
intentionally moving aside the flaps of their jackets displaying what appeared to be holstered<br />
handguns. Intruders verbally assaulted and threatened employees of AJNA, removed AJNA’s CEO,<br />
Nina Zajic (“ZAJIC”), and AJNA’s controller, Joseph Gill by physical force. At RUSSO’s and<br />
KHURANA’s directions, armed men unlawfully detained several AJNA’s employees restraining<br />
their movement by physical force, demanded that employees provide AJNA’s confidential and<br />
proprietary financial records, combination to AJNA’s safe and passkey to AJNA’s computers.<br />
RUSSO stated to employees that he “is running the show now” and, pointing at the armed men<br />
accompanying him, repeatedly threatened the employees that the “big guys surrounding the premises<br />
don't mess around”.<br />
After being unable to obtain the combination to AJNA’s safe, at RUSSO’s directions, his<br />
accomplices broke into the safe using a special drill, which the intruders brought with them.<br />
Intruders cracked the safe and removed over $50,000 in cash and also removed confidential and<br />
proprietary AJNA’s documents located in the safe. One of the intruders, appearing to be a “computer<br />
engineer” accessed AJNA’s computers and servers and copied data on disks, which he brought with<br />
him.<br />
Notably, prior to the raid, HAOUZI, on numerous occasions, during the pendency of Little<br />
Rest Twelve action, telephoned ZAJIC and David Kay, AJNA’s vice-president, in a threatening<br />
manner, expressed his “displeasure” that the Court was “taking too long” to decide his claim to the<br />
ownership of 15% of LRT. HAOUZI made threats that he would “expedite” this matter “in his own<br />
way.”<br />
3
RUSSO, KHURANA, HAOUZI, AND THEIR ACCOMPLICES ENGAGED<br />
IN CRIMINAL CONDUCT PROSCRIBED BY <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> PENAL LAW<br />
AJNA respectfully alleges that RUSSO, KHURANA, HAOUZI and their accomplices,<br />
whose names are not presently known to AJNA, engaged in conduct violative of New York Penal<br />
Law, including: § 120.14 - menacing in the second degree; § 120.15 - menacing in the third degree;<br />
§ 120.20 - reckless endangerment in the second degree; § 135.05 - unlawful imprisonment in the<br />
second degree; § 135.65 - coercion in the first degree; § 140.05 trespass; § 140.10 criminal trespass<br />
in the third degree; § 140.17 - criminal trespass in the first degree; § 140.20 - burglary in the third<br />
degree; § 140.25 - burglary in the second degree; § 140.35 - possession of burglar's tools; § 145.10 -<br />
criminal mischief in the second degree; § 155.25 - petit larceny; § 155.30 - grand Larceny in the<br />
fourth degree; § 155.35 - grand larceny in the third degree; § 155.40 Grand larceny in the second<br />
degree; §156.10 Computer Trespass; § 156.05 Unauthorized use of a computer; § 156.30 Unlawful<br />
duplication of computer related material in the first degree; § 160.05 Robbery in the third degree;<br />
§ 160.10 Robbery in the second degree; § 160.15 Robbery in the first degree; § 165.40 Criminal<br />
possession of stolen property in the fifth degree; § 165.45 Criminal possession of stolen property<br />
in the fourth degree; § 165.50 - criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree; § 165.52 -<br />
criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree; § 20.00 - criminal liability for conduct<br />
of another; 190.26 - criminal impersonation in the first degree.<br />
In addition RUSSO made false statements to police that he had an authority from the Court<br />
to engage in the above described conduct.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Based upon the aforesaid, and the Referral Order AJNA respectfully requests that the<br />
Manhattan District Attorney investigate this matter.<br />
4<br />
Respectfully submitted,
STERNIK & ZELTSER<br />
by: Emanuel Zeltser<br />
Emanuel Zeltser, Esq.<br />
119 West 72 nd Street<br />
New York, NY 10023<br />
t/f 212-656-1810<br />
email: lawmail@rambler.ru<br />
DATED: April 15, 2010<br />
VERIFICATION<br />
by David Kay<br />
DAVID KAY, declares under the penalty of perjury:<br />
5<br />
DAVIDOFF MALITO &<br />
HUTCHER LLP<br />
by: ____________________<br />
William P. Walzer, Esq<br />
200 Garden City Plaza, Suite 315<br />
Garden City, New York 11530<br />
tel.516.248.6400<br />
fax: 516 -248-6422<br />
wpw@dmlegal.com<br />
1. I am vice president of Little Rest Twelve, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates<br />
AJNA Bar.<br />
2. I have read the Brief submitted to the Manhattan District Attorney pursuant to Referral Order<br />
of the Court.<br />
3. I personally witnessed many of the events described in the Brief.<br />
4. I certify that all factual assertions in the Brief are true and correct to the best of my<br />
knowledge and belief.<br />
April 12, 2010<br />
New York, NY<br />
_______________________<br />
David Kay