Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
23<br />
As the Law makes a distinction in Manslaughter, Viz. Voluntary Manslaughter in heat of<br />
Passion, and Manslaughter Se defendendo. Under which of these Predicaments does he fall?<br />
The Court is of Opinion the Prisoner Lieut. Col. Jno. BAYARD is Guilty of Voluntary<br />
Manslaughter in heat of Passion. Therefore do Adjudge the Prisoner Lieut. Col. Jno. BAYARD<br />
to be suspended for three Months.<br />
The court reconvened on April 28 th to revise their proceedings, adjourned until the 29 th and then<br />
delivered a revised sentence to wit:<br />
The Judge Advocate General by Command of his sic Majesty, has Signifyed sic to his Excelly.<br />
The Commander in Chief, that Altho the Prisoner Lt. Colo. Bayard, was not expressly arraigned,<br />
upon a Charge of murder, yet as the Court martial, appears Throughout the Tryal, to have had that<br />
Point Particularly in view, and has actually Declared him not Guilty of Murder, but of<br />
Manslaughter Only, the King Considers this Declaration of the Court as a Compleat sic Acquittal,<br />
of the Prisoner from the Crime of Murder, and His Majesty is pleased to Confirm the Said<br />
Acquittal, which Seams sic to be warrented sic by evidences, but His Majesty does not think fit to<br />
ratify the Opinion of the Court, by which the Prisoner is found guilty of manslaughter, (a<br />
Distinction Peculiar to the Common Law of England) nor the Judgement of the Court whereby the<br />
Prisoner is Sentenced to be Cashiered, but is Graciously pleased Absolutely to Remit the Same<br />
and to order the Prisoner Lt. Colo. Bayard be released from his arrest. 56<br />
Thus ended the sorry saga of the murder of Lieutenant Bird by his own commanding officer. We<br />
do not know the nature of the relationship between Bird and Bayard. They were both young men<br />
and clearly knew each other prior to Bird’s joining the regiment. For indeterminate reasons,<br />
Bayard badgered Bird into buying a commission in the King’s <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>Rangers</strong>. Their<br />
relationship gives every appearance of being adversarial from the beginning. It is indeed nothing<br />
short of enigmatic.<br />
The consequences of this incident went far beyond the court martial and had several impacts on<br />
the King’s <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>Rangers</strong>. In the first instant, it surely dragged morale to even greater depths.<br />
As a further consequence, it lead to a rupture between Bayard and Coffin, each blaming the other<br />
in large measure for allowing the altercation to evolve to its violent end. Certainly it was the<br />
primary factor in causing Coffin to begin seeking opportunities outside the regiment. It may also<br />
have been one of the factors which soured Captain Lewis Burgess so terribly as evidenced by his<br />
actions relating to the posting of the regiment to Nova Scotia later in the year. However<br />
unintentional, this sordid affair further poisoned the regiment’s chalice.<br />
At Head Quarters in New York, on March 15th, Lieutenant Alexander McDonald was tried for<br />
sending Lieutenant Hamilton a challenge defaming his character. He is found not guilty of<br />
sending a challenge, but is guilty of defaming Lieutenant Hamilton’s character and suspended<br />
from duty and pay for two months. 57 An advertisement was placed in the Royal Gazette on<br />
September 23rd by Lieutenant Bazil Rorison for a sorrel mare lost on the road from New York to<br />
56 Kemble Orderly Book, New York Historical Society<br />
57 Delancey’s Order Book pp.53-54.<br />
King’s <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>Rangers</strong>