25 July 2012 - East Devon District Council
25 July 2012 - East Devon District Council
25 July 2012 - East Devon District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Arising from consideration of the above minutes:-<br />
23<br />
Meeting of the <strong>Council</strong>, <strong>25</strong> <strong>July</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
a) Localisation of <strong>Council</strong> Tax Benefit for working age customers<br />
(Cabinet Minute 29)<br />
Correction in text to read Portfolio Holder – Corporate Business instead of<br />
Corporate Services.<br />
b) Seaton – Windsor Gardens access (Cabinet Minute 40)<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lor Peter Burrows who had specially attended the Cabinet meeting<br />
to raise concerns about the potential problems of allowing developers<br />
access across Windsor Gardens for a year said that these concerns should<br />
have been more clearly set out in the minutes. He said that traffic<br />
movements were a real issue. The Leader advised that the <strong>Council</strong> had<br />
ensured that the conditions attached to the permission would minimise<br />
disruption and that the Portfolio Holder – Environment and his Deputy<br />
would monitor the works.<br />
c) Cabinet – 11 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong>lor Pauline Stott had not been present and asked for her apologies<br />
to be recorded.<br />
d) Planning Policy – New <strong>East</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> Local Plan 2006 – 2026<br />
Special Meeting of Development Management Committee (Minute 11)<br />
Proposed amendments:<br />
1. <strong>Council</strong>lor Roger Giles proposed an amendment to the minute to reduce<br />
the allocation of 2 hectares of employment land at Ottery St Mary to 0.67<br />
hectares. He said that this would reflect the advice in the Roger Tym<br />
and Partners‟ report which had been commissioned by the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
The amendment was seconded by <strong>Council</strong>lor Claire Wright.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lor Mark Williamson asked the Planning Policy Manager to<br />
respond. Matt Dickins advised that Roger Tym‟s report referred to<br />
Class B Land Use but the 2 hectares included in the draft Local Plan<br />
had wider implications and included educational, retail and residential<br />
care use.<br />
The amendment was put to the vote and lost.<br />
2. <strong>Council</strong>lor Mike Allen proposed that an Extraordinary meeting of the<br />
<strong>Council</strong> be held to enable all <strong>Council</strong>lors to be presented with a full<br />
version of the Local Plan and to contribute to the debate. This would<br />
include further consideration of the proposal in respect of the Sidford<br />
development land and advice from the Environment Agency and<br />
Highways. He said that the meeting could be timetabled without causing<br />
disruption to the Local Plan process and its timelines.