05.06.2013 Views

Theory and Practice in Language Studies Contents - Academy ...

Theory and Practice in Language Studies Contents - Academy ...

Theory and Practice in Language Studies Contents - Academy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

662<br />

© 2012 ACADEMY PUBLISHER<br />

THEORY AND PRACTICE IN LANGUAGE STUDIES<br />

cognitive load process <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g comprehension which Weir et al. (2009b) found that there is a high correlation<br />

between the construct measured by IELTS <strong>and</strong> that of academic read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the target space.<br />

Given that I found many studies (Ellis, 1994; Nunan, 2003; Richards, 2005) show<strong>in</strong>g the multiple <strong>in</strong>fluences of<br />

listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> primary <strong>and</strong> secondary language learn<strong>in</strong>g, the outcome of this study po<strong>in</strong>ts out that listen<strong>in</strong>g performance<br />

have a large correlation with EFL proficiency. Emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g the relationship between listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g skill – one<br />

starts acquir<strong>in</strong>g listen<strong>in</strong>g at birth but writ<strong>in</strong>g acquisition starts at school age <strong>in</strong> first language, the EFL test result<br />

confirms the core of Shanahan‟s (2006) discussion about the impact of listen<strong>in</strong>g skill <strong>in</strong>struction on writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development. The multiple correlations <strong>in</strong> the current study focused on one dependent variable – listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> three<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent variables – speak<strong>in</strong>g, read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g as well as overall performance account<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>terrelationship of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dependent variables. The analysis produced multiple coefficient of 0.887 (p≤ .000). This result is remarkably high<br />

to consider the importance of listen<strong>in</strong>g skill <strong>in</strong> EFL classrooms. In the end, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g – the higher the listen<strong>in</strong>g score,<br />

the better the speak<strong>in</strong>g also supports James (1985) <strong>and</strong> Rost‟s (1994) research suggest<strong>in</strong>g three essential roles listen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

plays to improve speak<strong>in</strong>g skill. Rost ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed that spoken language provides a means of <strong>in</strong>teraction for the learner.<br />

This is because learners must <strong>in</strong>teract to achieve underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> access to speakers of the language is essential.<br />

Return<strong>in</strong>g to a high correlation between listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g, Dörnyei (2001) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed that focus<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

situation contributes significantly to the motivation of a particular task. This op<strong>in</strong>ion aligns with participants <strong>in</strong> this<br />

study who benefit from read<strong>in</strong>g skill <strong>in</strong> English at middle, high schools <strong>and</strong> college as a subject. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of this<br />

study supports the fact that the situational environment is an important element <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g language learn<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />

could not be seen as a surpris<strong>in</strong>g result show<strong>in</strong>g that participants, due to devoid of English language exposure <strong>in</strong> Iran,<br />

participants score aural/oral skill less than orthographic <strong>and</strong> expressive skills <strong>in</strong> this study. Similarly, the result of this<br />

study confirms Hulstijn (2001) argument <strong>in</strong> psychol<strong>in</strong>guistic perspectives <strong>in</strong> that hav<strong>in</strong>g access to basic knowledge of<br />

vocabulary stored <strong>in</strong> long – term memory contributes learners to the systematic rehearsal <strong>and</strong> other cognitive strategies.<br />

Further, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of this study demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the close relationship between listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g performance is<br />

consistent with the results of Badian (1999) <strong>and</strong> Bergman‟s (1999) research. Thus, participants‟ background knowledge<br />

of read<strong>in</strong>g assisted them to score the highest <strong>in</strong> the read<strong>in</strong>g b<strong>and</strong>.<br />

VII. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTION<br />

This study exam<strong>in</strong>ed the relationship between listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> other EFL skills – speak<strong>in</strong>g, read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g as well<br />

as overall performance <strong>in</strong> the International English <strong>Language</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g System. The data collected for the purpose of this<br />

study were the results announced on the IELTS centre site <strong>in</strong> Iran. The significant positive correlations I found between<br />

listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> other language skills are particularly strong with<strong>in</strong> the context of EFL provid<strong>in</strong>g evidence that listen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

skill matters even <strong>in</strong> situation where English is not the primary language. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is important because there are<br />

few studies report<strong>in</strong>g the significant correlation between listen<strong>in</strong>g skill <strong>and</strong> EFL language proficiency. Closely aligned<br />

with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, there is a very strong body of support for syllabus designers <strong>and</strong> English language <strong>in</strong>structors to frame<br />

the doma<strong>in</strong> of listen<strong>in</strong>g skill attention <strong>in</strong> the classroom <strong>in</strong>struction. Even though this study provided a focus on EFL<br />

listen<strong>in</strong>g relationship with other language skills without exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the impact of EFL listen<strong>in</strong>g skill <strong>in</strong>struction, the<br />

results are strong enough to guarantee further research look<strong>in</strong>g at the impact of learn<strong>in</strong>g strategy on EFL language<br />

proficiency.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Asher, J. J. (1977). Learn<strong>in</strong>g another language through actions: The complete teacher's guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks.<br />

[2] Badger, R., & Yan, X. (2009). The use of tactics <strong>and</strong> strategies by Ch<strong>in</strong>ese students <strong>in</strong> the listen<strong>in</strong>g component of IELTS.<br />

IELTS Research Reports SiLT 4, 67-95.<br />

[3] Badian, N. A. (1999). Read<strong>in</strong>g disability def<strong>in</strong>ed as a discrepancy between listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g comprehension. Journal of<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g Disabilities, 32, 138-148.<br />

[4] Bergman, O. (1999). Wait for me! Reader control of narration rate <strong>in</strong> talk<strong>in</strong>g books. International Read<strong>in</strong>g Association's<br />

Read<strong>in</strong>g Onl<strong>in</strong>e. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from www.read<strong>in</strong>gord<strong>in</strong>e.arg /articles /art<br />

_<strong>in</strong>dex.asp?HREF=bergman/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

[5] Bern<strong>in</strong>ger, V. (2000). Development of language by h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> its connections to language by ear, mouth <strong>and</strong> eye. Topics <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Language</strong> Disorders, 20, 65-84.<br />

[6] Brown, G. (2008). Selective listen<strong>in</strong>g. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology <strong>and</strong> Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics<br />

36(1), 10-21.<br />

[7] Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies <strong>in</strong> the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

[8] Colman, G., & Heap, S. (1998). The mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation of directions for the questions <strong>in</strong> the American read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> listen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sub-Test of the IELTS test. IELTS Research Reports SiLT, 4, 38-71.<br />

[9] Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

[10] Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension <strong>in</strong> second language learn<strong>in</strong>g. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 7, 257-274.<br />

[11] Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listen<strong>in</strong>g ability: An overlooked dimension <strong>in</strong> language acquisition. The Modern <strong>Language</strong><br />

Journal, 75(2), 173-180.<br />

[12] Field, J. (2009). The cognitive validity of the lecture-based question <strong>in</strong> the IELTS listen<strong>in</strong>g paper. IELTS Research Reports, 9,<br />

17-65.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!