OsseoTite Surface - Biomet 3i
OsseoTite Surface - Biomet 3i
OsseoTite Surface - Biomet 3i
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5<br />
Greater Bone Healing Confirmed<br />
Rate: Early Loading Clinical Studies<br />
Historically, the recommended time between<br />
placement and functional loading of dental implants<br />
has been four months for the mandible and six<br />
months for the maxilla. With the development of<br />
the OSSEOTITE ® Implant, patients are now being<br />
restored and returned to function sooner than<br />
previously thought possible.<br />
In an ongoing multicenter clinical investigation,<br />
a total of 429 OSSEOTITE Implants were placed in<br />
155 patients at 10 study centers and subsequently<br />
loaded two months following placement. 4 The<br />
cumulative implant survival rate was 98.5% at<br />
12.6 months.<br />
OSSEOTITE Provides<br />
2-Month Loading And<br />
A 215% Increase In Mean<br />
Bone Contact.<br />
Extent: Increased Bone/Implant<br />
Contact Human Histology<br />
In a study of the effect of implant surface<br />
features on bone healing, human histologic<br />
data confirmed the increase in Osteoconduction<br />
and Contact Osteogenesis the OSSEOTITE<br />
<strong>Surface</strong> provides. 2mm diameter screws,<br />
each having one side OSSEOTITE and<br />
one side machined surface, were placed in<br />
the posterior maxilla and removed after<br />
six months of healing. The thirty-nine histologic<br />
sections prepared showed a mean percent<br />
bone/implant contact for OSSEOTITE of 72.96%<br />
compared to 33.98% for the machined surface. 5<br />
Equally impressive was the fact that in thirteen<br />
of the histologic sections the machined surface<br />
showed no bone/implant contact while the<br />
OSSEOTITE <strong>Surface</strong> on the same implants<br />
had up to 92% bone contact.<br />
% Bone/Implant Contact (BIC)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Stuart L. Graves, D.D.S., M.S. comments,<br />
“With 98% success rate following a 2 month<br />
loading protocol, you can almost guarantee your<br />
implant is going to work better than other<br />
conventional dental procedures.”<br />
In a follow up analysis recently submitted for<br />
publication, cumulative implant survival rate was<br />
98% at up to 43 months of observation.<br />
Human Histology<br />
Matched Machined and OSSEOTITE <strong>Surface</strong> Pairs<br />
OSSEOTITE <strong>Surface</strong><br />
Machine <strong>Surface</strong><br />
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39<br />
Dense Specimens Soft<br />
4. Lazarra et al “A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Loading Of OSSEOTITE Implants 2 Months After Placement: One Year Results”,<br />
Journal Of Esthetic Dentistry:, 1998:6:280-289.<br />
5. Lazarra et al “A Human Histologic Analysis Of OSSEOTITE And Machined <strong>Surface</strong>s Using Implants With 2 Opposing <strong>Surface</strong>s”, International<br />
Journal Of Periodontics And Restorative Dentistry:, 1999:19:117-129.