05.06.2013 Views

OsseoTite Surface - Biomet 3i

OsseoTite Surface - Biomet 3i

OsseoTite Surface - Biomet 3i

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5<br />

Greater Bone Healing Confirmed<br />

Rate: Early Loading Clinical Studies<br />

Historically, the recommended time between<br />

placement and functional loading of dental implants<br />

has been four months for the mandible and six<br />

months for the maxilla. With the development of<br />

the OSSEOTITE ® Implant, patients are now being<br />

restored and returned to function sooner than<br />

previously thought possible.<br />

In an ongoing multicenter clinical investigation,<br />

a total of 429 OSSEOTITE Implants were placed in<br />

155 patients at 10 study centers and subsequently<br />

loaded two months following placement. 4 The<br />

cumulative implant survival rate was 98.5% at<br />

12.6 months.<br />

OSSEOTITE Provides<br />

2-Month Loading And<br />

A 215% Increase In Mean<br />

Bone Contact.<br />

Extent: Increased Bone/Implant<br />

Contact Human Histology<br />

In a study of the effect of implant surface<br />

features on bone healing, human histologic<br />

data confirmed the increase in Osteoconduction<br />

and Contact Osteogenesis the OSSEOTITE<br />

<strong>Surface</strong> provides. 2mm diameter screws,<br />

each having one side OSSEOTITE and<br />

one side machined surface, were placed in<br />

the posterior maxilla and removed after<br />

six months of healing. The thirty-nine histologic<br />

sections prepared showed a mean percent<br />

bone/implant contact for OSSEOTITE of 72.96%<br />

compared to 33.98% for the machined surface. 5<br />

Equally impressive was the fact that in thirteen<br />

of the histologic sections the machined surface<br />

showed no bone/implant contact while the<br />

OSSEOTITE <strong>Surface</strong> on the same implants<br />

had up to 92% bone contact.<br />

% Bone/Implant Contact (BIC)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Stuart L. Graves, D.D.S., M.S. comments,<br />

“With 98% success rate following a 2 month<br />

loading protocol, you can almost guarantee your<br />

implant is going to work better than other<br />

conventional dental procedures.”<br />

In a follow up analysis recently submitted for<br />

publication, cumulative implant survival rate was<br />

98% at up to 43 months of observation.<br />

Human Histology<br />

Matched Machined and OSSEOTITE <strong>Surface</strong> Pairs<br />

OSSEOTITE <strong>Surface</strong><br />

Machine <strong>Surface</strong><br />

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39<br />

Dense Specimens Soft<br />

4. Lazarra et al “A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Loading Of OSSEOTITE Implants 2 Months After Placement: One Year Results”,<br />

Journal Of Esthetic Dentistry:, 1998:6:280-289.<br />

5. Lazarra et al “A Human Histologic Analysis Of OSSEOTITE And Machined <strong>Surface</strong>s Using Implants With 2 Opposing <strong>Surface</strong>s”, International<br />

Journal Of Periodontics And Restorative Dentistry:, 1999:19:117-129.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!