06.06.2013 Views

PDF (for b&w printout) - Living Reviews in Solar Physics

PDF (for b&w printout) - Living Reviews in Solar Physics

PDF (for b&w printout) - Living Reviews in Solar Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Sun <strong>in</strong> Time: Activity and Environment 35<br />

5.5 The extreme-ultraviolet and X-ray Sun <strong>in</strong> time<br />

The present-day Sun’s corona can be characterized by its total radiative output (mostly <strong>in</strong> the soft-<br />

X-ray regime) of a few times 10 26 erg s −1 at m<strong>in</strong>imum activity level to a few times 10 27 erg s −1<br />

at maximum activity level outside very strong flares; its electron temperature of about 1 – 5 MK,<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on the magnetic coronal structure under consideration; and its fill<strong>in</strong>g factor. The latter<br />

is difficult to def<strong>in</strong>e as a large variety of (partly expand<strong>in</strong>g) structures conf<strong>in</strong>ed by closed or open<br />

magnetic fields def<strong>in</strong>e the magnetic corona. Suffice it to say that the strongest magnetic active<br />

regions are conf<strong>in</strong>ed the volumes closely attached to photospheric sunspot complexes, and the latter<br />

cover less than 1% of the solar surface even at activity maximum. Clearly, the solar corona is far<br />

from be<strong>in</strong>g filled by lum<strong>in</strong>ous active regions.<br />

5.5.1 The solar X-ray corona <strong>in</strong> time<br />

Although coronae radiate across the electromagnetic spectrum, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant losses occur <strong>in</strong> the<br />

soft-X-ray range; the radio regime provides complementary diagnostics on non-thermal processes.<br />

I concentrate on these two aspects (see Section 5.7 <strong>for</strong> details on radio emission).<br />

The total X-ray output of a stellar corona depends on the available magnetic energy and is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e a consequence of the dynamo operation. Younger and more rapidly rotat<strong>in</strong>g stars are<br />

more X-ray lum<strong>in</strong>ous; as is the case <strong>for</strong> UV and FUV radiation, the X-ray output decreases as the<br />

star ages and its rotation period <strong>in</strong>creases. For solar analogs, the decay law is,<br />

LX ≈ (3 ± 1) × 10 28 t −1.5±0.3<br />

9 [erg s −1 ] , (12)<br />

(where t9 is the stellar age <strong>in</strong> Gyr) as derived from small but well-characterized samples (Maggio<br />

et al., 1987; Güdel et al., 1997b). This decay law holds <strong>for</strong> MS stars back <strong>in</strong> time as long as<br />

• Equation 12 predicts a lum<strong>in</strong>osity at or below saturation <strong>for</strong> a solar analog, i.e., LX/Lbol ∼ < 10 −3 ,<br />

or LX ∼ < 4 × 10 30 erg s −1 ;<br />

• the rotation period is a function of age <strong>for</strong> a star of given mass.<br />

The second condition is fulfilled only <strong>for</strong> ages higher than (at least) 100 Myr (Soderblom et al.<br />

1993, see Section 5.2). Consequently, the X-ray lum<strong>in</strong>osity of a solar analog is nearly only a<br />

function of rotation period <strong>for</strong> stars older than ≈ 100 – 200 Myr, and this dependence is given by<br />

LX = 10 31.05±0.12 P −2.64±0.12 [erg s −1 ] (13)<br />

as derived from a sample of nearby solar analogs (Güdel et al. 1997b; see Figure 14; a very<br />

similar decay law is found from measurements conducted with broadband spectrometers on board<br />

XMM-Newton: LX ∝ 4.04 × 10 30 P −2.03±0.35 [erg s −1 ], see Telleschi et al. 2005). The rotationactivity<br />

law (Equation 13) is confirmed by broader studies, also with regard to Rossby number<br />

Ro that is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the ratio between the two time scales of rotation and convection driv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

dynamo (Ro = P/τc, where τc is the convective turnover time; Noyes et al. 1984; Mangeney and<br />

Praderie 1984). All studies f<strong>in</strong>d roughly LX/Lbol ∝ P −2 <strong>for</strong> late-type stars (e.g., Randich 2000).<br />

Also, other activity <strong>in</strong>dicators such as the surface X-ray flux follow an equivalent law.<br />

Alternatively, the X-ray output roughly scales with the square of the equatorial velocity,<br />

LX ≈ 10 27 (v s<strong>in</strong> i) 2<br />

[erg s −1 ] (14)<br />

(Pallavic<strong>in</strong>i et al., 1981; Ayres and L<strong>in</strong>sky, 1980; Maggio et al., 1987; Wood et al., 1994). The Xray<br />

output is an excellent <strong>in</strong>dicator of dynamo activity. The coronal output is strongly determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by parameters that control the magnetic dynamo.<br />

<strong>Liv<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Reviews</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Solar</strong> <strong>Physics</strong><br />

http://www.liv<strong>in</strong>greviews.org/lrsp-2007-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!