July 27, 2004 - North Orange County Community College District

278 278
BLOCK VOTE APPROVAL: It was moved by Trustee Otto Lacayo and seconded by
Trustee Jeff Brown that the following items be approved by block vote:
Finance & Facilities: 3.a, 3.b, 3.c, 3.d, 3.e, 3.g, 3.h, 3.I, 3.j
Instructional Services: 4.a. 4.b, 4.c, 4.e, 4.f, 4.i
Human Resources: 5.c, 5.d, 5.e, 5.f, 5.g
Motion carried unanimously by those members present, including the Student
Trustees’ advisory votes.
In response to a Trustee inquiry, the Chancellor will obtain a legal opinion regarding the
protocol to be followed in pulling items from block vote approval.
REPORTS:
A. As a part of the Chancellor’s Report, Fred Williams, District Director of Fiscal Affairs,
conducted a presentation on the status of the state budget. Recent news from
Sacramento indicates that the Assembly and Senate will vote on the proposed state
budget by Wednesday or Thursday. Overall, the state budget proposes a 7.4%
increase for the community college system. However, there is a possible Governor’s
veto pending of $27 million of Partnership for Excellence funds. Highlights of the state
budget under consideration include the following: 1) 2.41% cost of living adjustment;
2) 3.65% in growth funds (.65% for those districts with overcap FTES at Second
Principal Apportionment); 3) 1.66% growth funds for specified categorical programs;
4) $80 million for credit equalization; 5) $6 million for noncredit matriculation; 6) $27
million increase for Instructional Equipment and Scheduled Maintenance funding; 7) a
$26 enrollment fee; 8) no differential fee for students with bachelor’s degrees; and 9)
Partnership for Excellence funds to be folded into the base apportionment.
If the preceding is approved by both the Senate and Assembly, including the
Governor’s proposed veto, the District’s 2004-05 proposed budget could include the
following: 1) 2.7% cost of living adjustment; 2) $3 million in growth funds; 3) $3
million in equalization funds; 4) $1.6 million in Instructional Equipment and Scheduled
Maintenance funds; and 5) $6.1 million in Partnership for Excellence funds.
(See Supplemental Minutes #922 for a copy of the presentation.)
B. Chancellor Hunter entertained questions from the Board regarding the recent
monthly facilities executive summary provided by FLCM. In response to trustee
inquiries, Al Schafer clarified the following: 1) the difference between a 10-year and
50-year storm drain; 2) the process to be followed if an amendment to a campus
environmental impact report is deemed necessary; 3) the process to be followed in
obtaining state approval of construction projects; 4) the memorandum of
understanding with NORESCO – specifically with phases 1 and 2 of the cogeneration