Gesture-Based Interaction with Time-of-Flight Cameras
Gesture-Based Interaction with Time-of-Flight Cameras
Gesture-Based Interaction with Time-of-Flight Cameras
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 2. TIME-OF-FLIGHT CAMERAS<br />
back to the detector. This implies that time-<strong>of</strong>-flight systems fall into the category <strong>of</strong><br />
active range imaging techniques.<br />
Like TOF cameras, laser scanners can be used to implement this approach. A<br />
major disadvantage <strong>of</strong> laser scanners is, however, that they can only measure the<br />
distance to a single point in the scene at a time. Thus, they sweep the laser beam<br />
across the scene to obtain an entire range image, which reduces the temporal <strong>of</strong> res-<br />
olution <strong>of</strong> the imager.<br />
2.3.5 Summary<br />
In contrast to the above mentioned procedures to measuring range, a number <strong>of</strong><br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> the TOF sensor technology can be highlighted. These advantages can<br />
roughly be divided into three categories: the robustness <strong>of</strong> the measurement, the<br />
reliability <strong>of</strong> the hardware, and the cost <strong>of</strong> production.<br />
As mentioned above, the most competitive alternative to TOF cameras are stereo<br />
systems. However, one has to note that stereo systems only work under very restric-<br />
tive constraints on the scene, i.e. the surfaces <strong>of</strong> the measured objects have to provide<br />
sufficient texture for a robust estimate <strong>of</strong> the point-to-point correspondences. Here,<br />
TOF cameras are less dependent on the scene and their main limitations in this con-<br />
text are objects <strong>with</strong> specular surfaces. At the same time TOF cameras are widely<br />
independent <strong>of</strong> the ambient light conditions as they rely on their own active illumi-<br />
nation.<br />
Although TOF cameras cannot match the accuracy <strong>of</strong> laser scanners they <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
the advantage that they use solid state sensor technology, i.e. the cameras are not<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> moving parts which makes them very reliable and reduces maintenance<br />
costs. Furthermore, they can achieve a higher temporal resolution as the range mea-<br />
surement is computed in hardware in each pixel for an entire image and instead <strong>of</strong><br />
scanning the scene.<br />
Finally, TOF cameras can be mass-produced at a very low cost because they are<br />
based on standard CMOS technology. Thus, the sensor itself lies in the same price<br />
range as regular 2D image sensors. Although, additional costs arise due to the illumi-<br />
nation and control units, TOF systems are still cheaper than stereo cameras, which<br />
generally involve two high quality imagers. Here, they also have the advantage <strong>of</strong><br />
being smaller in size.<br />
14