Issue 4 - August 2010 - Pacini Editore
Issue 4 - August 2010 - Pacini Editore
Issue 4 - August 2010 - Pacini Editore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
146<br />
38 Martignoni G, Pea M, Gobbo S, et al. Cathepsin-K immunoreactivity<br />
distinguishes MiTF/TFE family renal translocation carcinomas from<br />
other renal carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2009;22:1016-22.<br />
39 Tickoo SK, dePeralta-Venturina MN, Harik LR, et al. Spectrum of<br />
epithelial neoplasms in end-stage renal disease: an experience from<br />
66 tumor-bearing kidneys with emphasis on histologic patterns distinct<br />
from those in sporadic adult renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol<br />
2006;30:141-53.<br />
40 Gobbo S, Eble JN, Grignon DJ, et al. Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell<br />
Carcinoma: A Distinct Histopathologic and Molecular Genetic Entity.<br />
Am J Surg Pathol 2008 (in press).<br />
41 Kuhn E, De Anda J, Manoni S, et al. Renal cell carcinoma associated<br />
with prominent angioleiomyoma-like proliferation: Report of 5 cases<br />
and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1372-81.<br />
42 Zigeuner R, Ratschek M, Rehak P, et al. Value of p53 as a prognostic<br />
marker in histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic<br />
analysis of primary and metastatic tumor tissue. Urology 2004;63:651-<br />
5.<br />
43 Shvarts O, Seligson D, Lam J, et al. p53 is an independent predictor of<br />
tumor recurrence and progression after nephrectomy in patients with<br />
localized renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2005;173:725-8.<br />
44 Rioux-Leclercq N, Turlin B, Bansard J, et al. Value of immunohistochemical<br />
Ki-67 and p53 determinations as predictive factors of<br />
outcome in renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2000;55:501-5.<br />
45 Visapaa H, Bui M, Huang Y, et al. Correlation of Ki-67 and gelsolin<br />
expression to clinical outcome in renal clear cell carcinoma. Urology<br />
2003;61:845-50.<br />
46 Dudderidge TJ, Stoeber K, Loddo M, et al. Mcm2, Geminin,<br />
and KI67 define proliferative state and are prognostic markers<br />
5 th triennial congress of the italian society of anatomic Pathology and diagnostic cytoPathology<br />
in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2510-7.<br />
47 Miyata Y, Koga S, Kanda S, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2<br />
in renal cell carcinoma: correlation with tumor cell proliferation,<br />
apoptosis, angiogenesis, expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2,<br />
and survival. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:1741-9.<br />
48 Hashimoto Y, Kondo Y, Kimura G, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression<br />
and relationship to tumour progression in human renal cell<br />
carcinoma. Histopathology 2004;44:353-9.<br />
49 Yao M, Tabuchi H, Nagashima Y, et al. Gene expression analysis of<br />
renal carcinoma: adipose differentiation-related protein as a potential<br />
diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for clear-cell renal carcinoma. J<br />
Pathol 2005;205:377-87.<br />
50 Bui MH, Seligson D, Han KR, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent<br />
predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma:<br />
implications for prognosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:802-<br />
11.<br />
51 Moch H, Sauter G, Buchholz N, Gasser TC, et al. Epidermal growth<br />
factor receptor expression is associated with rapid tumor cell proliferation<br />
in renal cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1997;28:1255-9.<br />
52 Uhlman DL, Nguyen P, Manivel JC, et al. Epidermal growth factor<br />
receptor and transforming growth factor alpha expression in papillary<br />
and nonpapillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation with metastatic<br />
behavior and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 1995;1:913-20.<br />
53 Jacobsen J, Grankvist K, Rasmuson T, et al. Expression of vascular<br />
endothelial growth factor protein in human renal cell carcinoma. BJU<br />
Int 2004;93:297-302.<br />
54 Went P, Dirnhofer S, Salvisberg T, et al. Expression of epithelial cell<br />
adhesion molecule (EpCam) in renal epithelial tumors. Am J Surg<br />
Pathol 2005;29:83-8.<br />
Molecular diagnosis of solid tumours.<br />
A practical approach for organ pathologies<br />
Molecular diagnosis in solid tumor: the breast<br />
A. Sapino, C. Marchiò<br />
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Oncologia Umana. Torino.<br />
Italy<br />
Molecular techniques are, nowadays, in common use in pathology<br />
laboratories, especially in the field of cancer diagnosis.<br />
In breast pathology, molecular testing continues to expand<br />
as requests by the oncologists of more precise prediction on<br />
response to treatment and risk of recurrence increase.<br />
In situ hybridization techniques, such ad FISH/CISH, SISH<br />
to test HER2 gene status, are the basic and most widely used<br />
molecular tests applied to breast cancer diagnosis. However,<br />
following the results of the first studies of microarrays used<br />
as prognostic/ predictive tools, countless prognostic and/or<br />
predictive signatures have been developed. Two of these<br />
signatures, the MammaPrint ® (Agendia BV, Amsterdam,<br />
Netherlands) and the Oncotype DX ® (Genomic Health Inc.,<br />
Redwood City, CA, USA) have achieved the FDA approval.<br />
In Italy, both of them are commercially available only for<br />
patients’ use. In particular, the first assay is based upon a<br />
multi-gene prognostic predictive score comprising 70 genes<br />
and works on mRNA extracted form fresh cancer tissues.<br />
This signature segregates patients in two categories: one of<br />
good prognosis (“low-risk” group), and one of poor prognosis<br />
(“high-risk” group). The Oncotype DX ® is an RT-PCR based<br />
test that is based on the mRNA expression levels of only 21<br />
genes (16 cancer related genes and 5 reference genes) and is<br />
presented as single Recurrence Score, which is a continuous<br />
variable ranging between 0 and 100 divided into three risk<br />
Moderators: G. Tallini (Bologna), G. Stanta (Trieste)<br />
groups: low (< 18), intermediate (18-31) and high (RS ≥31),<br />
for clinical decision-making. The main goal of both signatures<br />
is to safely spare patients at “low molecular risk” with border<br />
line biological risk from chemotherapy. However extensive<br />
validation of MammaPrint ® and of Oncotype DX ® represents<br />
the main challenge in integrating them in the standard of<br />
breast patients care. Combining molecular assay results with<br />
the pathological and clinical features will pave the way to a<br />
new era in breast oncology.<br />
Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer<br />
A. Marchetti<br />
Sezione di Diagnostica Molecolare, Dipartimento di Oncologia e<br />
Medicina Sperimentale, Università “G. D’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italia<br />
Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related<br />
morbidity and mortality in industrialised countries, and about<br />
80% of primary lung cancers are non-small cell lung carcinomas<br />
(NSCLCs). The two most common subtypes of NSCLC,<br />
squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC)<br />
derive from different compartments in the lung. The main<br />
molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of NSCLC<br />
include: a) growth promoting pathways (EGFR, KRAS PI3K,<br />
ALK), b) growth inhibitory pathways (p53, Rb, P14ARF,<br />
STK11), c) apoptotic pathways (Bcl-2, Bax, Fas/FasL), d)<br />
pathways involved in DNA repair and immortalisation processes.<br />
A number of epigenetic changes, including DNA<br />
methylation, histone/chromatin protein modification, and<br />
micro-RNA expression can also contribute to tumour develop-