The Phoenix Project 930413 - CONTACT Phoenix Journal Review

APRIL 13, 1993 Page 21
have a special interest.
Many police officers understand that
today it is a fact-unspoken and unholy as
it is! that generally speaking, "his Honor's"
first duty, as a purely political appointee
and government agent, is to protect the
government's philosophies and political
agenda from the Public.
And yet the poor misled Public is kept
uninformed and forever fed the lie that:
"Judges are there to protect the Citizen's
right to a fair trial." Give us a break!
POLICE OFFICERS AS
EXPERT WITNESSES
Police officers have witnessed this be-
havior in the courts regularly for decades.
Some years ago one concerned and rather
outspoken officer put it this way:
"Under present judicial rules and
customs the social or political aims of
any particular sitting judge (or those of
his overseers) can, at the judge's discre-
tion, overpower the free will of the jury.
Due to its illicit nature, this usurpation
of power, the actual control sequence, is
always accomplished without the jury
being made aware of its application."
Officer Jack McLamb (June 1 985)
Although not so labeled, these are "high
crimes" and violations of the very founda-
tion of Constitutional mandates cover-
ing the American jury system. The
Public is never to know this because it is
believed that they would not tolerate such
subversive totalitarian activities.
Another police officer from Texas (a
14-year veteran) in his July 1989 letter
shared with me his own and others'
concerns in this fashion:
"Some of us (officers) have quietly
discussed this activity on several occa-
sions, but must confess that we have
never understood why a judge is allowed
to jury tamper. It is a unanimous con-
science here that, regardless of how
right and legal our protests might be,
any officers involved in bringing public
attention to such powerful, clandestine,
political controls, would probably be the
only ones punished. What we need is
mass support for such changes." Sgt.
M.T. of Texas, July 19, 1989
It is not difficult to relate to the frustra-
tion of our fellow officer as he and others at
his department struggle to resolve this
dilemma. It is hard to regularly witness
such systemic illegal activity, and at the
same time endure a sense of helplessness,
for knowing there is probably not the suf-
ficient support needed to bring corrective
enforcement action.
Sgt. M.T. is probably absolutely right.
Can't we just see one of the totally political
yes men that are appointed today as Police
Chiefs standing up and taking on this one!
Some of the g~od 'ole .Sheriffs who. .are,
elected by the People and feel answerable attorneys and some of their local police
to the People might take a stand, but not officers do) that very gradually, behind
most of today's Police Chiefs.
their backs, their LAWFUL right to a iair
After many years as a Cop, and having trial, as well as their powers as Jurors have
witnessed once again this nefarious usur- been secretly removed.
pation of power by a member of the Judi- Those "in the know" understand clearly
ciary at a murder trial, in Superior Court of that we once again have the "King's Agent/
Maricopa County, AZ, in October of this Judges" back in control of our courts.
past year-believe me, your editor, too, And currently, as some like to joke, it's
knows first hand whereof he speaks! not King George the 3rd but 'King Geotge
the Bush" now on the throne. 1C: At the
OUR SYSTEM REPLACED time of this original writing.i
Let's contrast the five basic judicial
"Before one can evaluate what is wrong, parameters identified aboveand which
he must first know what is right." (Sound were to have guaranteed ajust and honest
logic from your editor!) system in America-with the manner in
For those of us who may have forgotten which today's secret injustice systemworks.
some of what we learned in "Government
10 1" (and todaysupposed to work) it might 'SECRET" SYSTEM ALLOWS
be well to review for a moment the Consti- JUDGES TO CONTROL JURY
tutional system we were given, and then
notice how that system has been sup- Under rules that the American Aristoc-
planted (uprooted) and been replaced by racy has set up for itself Government Agent/
the corruption that is in operation today. Judges are politically appointed.
America's system of justice was built Under this set-up, private political dy-
upon some very sound, basic principles, nasties are protected, and lifelong immu-
several of which are these: nity from prosecution is virtually guaran-
1). The sixth and seventh Amend- teed them, as is also the security of per-
ments of the Bill of Rights guarantee us petual wealth and power.
a trial by jury. (A jury of our peers.) Listen: here are but a few of the changes
2). The Jury is to judge the LAW as that have been implemented which allow
well as the facts in the cases brought these elitists to control the outcome of any
before them. jury trial they wish.
3). The Jury is to hear all witnesses 1). Denying a selected defendant the
and examine all the evidence of the right to a trial by a jury of his peers.
case. How else can informed decision 2). Selectively withholding evidence
be reached? and testimony from the jury.
4). The Jury is to determine the 3). Hiding from the jury their lawful
penalty (sentence) of the guilty party. right and duty to decide if a law is fair
5). The judge is to serve as an unbi- and iust as it applies to each specific
ased resource for the jury, to answer case.
questions on the law, and as unbiased 4). The judge wrongly deciding the
referee on points of contention. punishment of the guilty party.
Although there are more, these five 5). Using despotic "contempt"
basic parameters are viewed as vital for a charges to silence or intimidate any
fair and just system of dispensing justice. who challenge these and other auto-
If observed they would effectively prevent cratic, corrupt and illicit practices.
any and all despots from ever gaining dic- Several other of the judge/agents9 "fa-
tatorial control over America! vorite" oppressive courtroom tactics which
Our forefathers knew the importance of often heavily influence the outcome ofjury
the above controls on government. They trials are listed:
had just come out from under a system The ability of a biased and corrupt judge
where the King, through his agent/judges, to overrule the objectionsof the Defendant's
would get rid of dissenters by holding counsel and sustain the obiection of his
phony trials and then simply eliminating government teammate, the Prosecutor.
the 'guilty' dissenter. In other words, the judge will stop op-
It was no accident, therefore, that our posing counsel from presenting to the jury
nation's founders built safeguards into our all the facts, (some of which may even be
system of government in hopes of prevent- crucial factors in a fair evaluation of the
ing this from ever occurring in the new law. case).
Then he will allow his secret "part-
THE KINGS MEN ARE BACK neF-the government prosecutor, to tell
the jury almost anything he wants.
In the main, today's American public In this manner, we see the governstill
believes, however naively, that these ment a-gent/.ddqe contmZs the idorma-
Constitutional safeguards are still in place tion goiw to the hrrr and therefom
and presently functioning. controls the outcome of the trial.
M.ost do- not lplpw [what AC!, judges, , ., , The subtle .,I. ~d~dqliberate
, A . . . I6 . . destruction of
. -