The Phoenix Project 930413 - CONTACT Phoenix Journal Review

Page 23
property rights, that laid the groundwork ing their full lawful powers, Jury Nullifica- ways!
for the "viability" of such a jury system. tion, and with respect to reviewing all The single purpose of our study is to
This system was so fair and equitable availableevidence, witnesses, etc. Hisvery show that, regardless of who or what is
that a Nineteenth century scholar by the stern and short reply to me was: "THE to blame, we are at a point where the
name of Lysander Spooner wrote extolling JURY (PUBLIC) IS NOT INTELLIGENT intended, all-important jury has been
the great virtue of this system in these ENOUGHTOBEENTRUSTED WITH SUCH rendered powerless and is just sitting
terms: POWERS." there as "eyewash" for public consump-
"If the Jury does not judge the law, the Needless to say, our relationship went tion.
facts, and all of the evidence, then they are downhill from there. I11 say this though, We need to fully concentrate our enmerely
the tools, rather than a barrier with that attitude he's perfect material for ergies on removing unlawful powers from
against the tyranny and oppression of the a "political judgeship" under our present the judiciary and restoring them to the
government." corrupt judicial system! People, in their capacity as Jurors.
Can you believe our present govern- One can get a definite feeling for the Rational people everywhere recognize
ment Aristocracy today trusting the Ameri- depth of our problems in our U.S. judiciary that indeed our Nation under God is
can people that much? NOT ON YOUR TIN from such exchanges. However, let's re- gone; in addition it is recognized that
BADGE! turn to further quotes from our 19th Cen- our freedom and independence are
We have discussed this before-that if tury scholar, Lysander C. Spooner. He almost gone. However, on a very posiany
of you "Johnny Laws" have ever continues: "It is not only the right and tive note, we CAN give thanks that the
dreamed of being a part of a martial Law duty of juries to judge what are the facts, few freedoms we have left (the vote of an
action, just wait a short while till these what is the law, and what is the moral independent jury being one) are quite
same power crazed Elitists trick the rest of intent of the accused but it is also their enough to restore what has been lost.
our fellow foolish Americans into turning right and their primaq and paramount So, let's get on with it!
in their guns for a more "KINDER AND duty to judge of the justice of the law, and
GENTLER NATION"! to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their JURY NULLIFICATION IS
However, keeping on point, the above opinion, unjust or oppmssive, and all A RIGHT
writings of the Honorable Mr. Spooner is persons guiltless in violating, or resisting
the way it used to be in our nation before the execution of such laws." It is interesting to note that in 1895
the Elitists decided that they them- Think about it. Occasionally police one single corrupt judge on the U.S.
selves were far more wise and could officers are accused of crimes and find Supreme Court usurped the right of the
better decide who would go free and who themselves facing a jury. Would not you American Jury to be told that they do
should be convicted of crimes against yourself prefer that a truly independent have the right to nullify bad law, or to be
"society" ("thestate" or more correctly jury of your peers decide your case rather careful as to the method in which a
the "ARISTOCRACY"). than a facade of jury-craftily selected specific law is applied to a particular
and secretly controlled by a single Aristo- case.
STOP QUOTING. To be Continued. crat Government Agent / Judge? He did this by bestowing the decisio.2
As for this writer, give me a jury of my of whether or not to tell the jury of their
*** peers--theirnamesrandomlyDRAWN OUT power to his brother Club Members in
OF A HAT, NO other question, no other the lower courts. This was done because
Further discussion at this time would screening, no other qualification, AND no the juries kept deciding in favor of what
be superfluous so we will simply leave off at secret judicial controls!! the majority of the American People
this point until we have opportunity to That is the only way to have a jury of wanted instead of what the government
finish the subject article. IF YOU HAVE peers. Elitists of that time wanted. Wasn't that
NOT YET BEEN THE "VICTIM" OF ONE Since space is always a consideration I nice? Question: Does the Supreme Court
OF THE FARCES IN COURT-HOLD have purposely focused mainlyon the jury's have the right to purposely strip, or hide
YOUR BREATH BECAUSE BEFORE IT'S right to decide both the law and the fact of away, the People's inalienable rights????
OVER-YOU WILL BE. SALU. the case before it. This is called "Jury As we have already discussed, it is
Ceres to clear. Nullification" by the honest, and "Jury through this kind of illicit judicial activ-
Lawlessness" bv members of the Evil Em- ism that these power-hungry Elitists
41 8/93 82 CERES 'ATONN pire ... protect certain individuals and promote
certain ~olitical goals and, at the same
CONTINUATION: JURY TAMPERING NOT ALL JUDGES ARE "BAD" time, p;nish otfier selected people or
(by Police Officer, Ret., Jack McLamb) groups, and crush any opposition to
Please remember that as hard-hitting their Elitist agenda.
THOSE WHO WOULD BE KINGS as this article may seem, the intention is president-King George the Bush, told
not to label all iudges as "bad oeo~le". us recently several times what the
A case in point: In 1982 I was inter- While it is all ioowtrue that ieariy all AGENDA is: his utopian 'New World
viewed on public television in Arizona. 1 judges use some secret illicit controls Order" (One World Government). Of
was an active duty police oficer at the time much of the time, we recognize that this course, it will be installed with him and
and also the Executive Director of a na- "power grab" has resulted from long his international cronies in complete
tional police organization. decades of well planned, gradual, piece- control of the world's people under the
Before the interview the moderator (an meal encroachments. United Nations. [C: And so it has come
attorney) and I had a moment to talk. We In fact the whole current, aberrant to pass for it no longer matter. WHO
were discussing the present problems with system has been so entrenched for so semes the Elite gods through the ofthe
criminal justice system. long, and gained such a high degree of fices of you-the-people; it works out
I had presented to him the "outland- acceptability that some offenders may the very same in the final tally.]
ish* idea that the jury (People), rather than even need to be somewhat excused, on We should believe them completely
the judge, should actually be allowed to grounds of ignorance. But excused ONLY when they tell us: "You won't need Condecide
the outcome of a jury trial by utiliz- until they are taught the errors of their stitutional protections in this new world