16.06.2013 Views

Selenology Today # 7 July 2007 - Home

Selenology Today # 7 July 2007 - Home

Selenology Today # 7 July 2007 - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2-4a<br />

GEOLOGIC LUNAR RESEARCH SELENOLOGY TODAY # 7<br />

The derivative matched filter algorithm<br />

is quite similar to the matched filter<br />

algorithm, however, the match is made to<br />

the first derivative of the reflectance<br />

spectrum. As discussed in Part I of this<br />

paper, derivative spectra can be useful in<br />

better distinguishing mixtures of<br />

minerals having overlapping peaks.<br />

Figure 2-5a shows the results of a<br />

derivative matched filter algorithm<br />

applied to the same pixel group on the<br />

floor of Bullialdus that was defined<br />

above. A strong correlation is shown by<br />

darker greyscale values.<br />

Figure 2-5a<br />

page 18<br />

Part 3. Calibration of User<br />

Created Lunar Multiband Images<br />

The Clementine calibrated UVVIS/NIR<br />

images provide tremendous spatial<br />

resolution, but some amateurs may want to<br />

create their own multiband images by<br />

using broadfilters with small telescopes.<br />

This section discusses how to calibrate<br />

such images and use them for the same<br />

types of analyses that were outlined above<br />

for Clementine calibrated images.<br />

This section attempts a relative<br />

calibration of five band spectral images<br />

taken through a small telescope and<br />

compares the results with Clementine<br />

reflectance data. The method used is based<br />

upon use of the Apollo 16 site and Apollo<br />

16 laboratory speciman 62231 as<br />

calibration standards. There is no attempt<br />

to achieve an absolute calibration of the<br />

five filter images by either correcting for<br />

phase angles outside of the 20 to 50<br />

degree range in which reflectance values<br />

agree reasonably well with the standard<br />

geometry used by Clementine, or by<br />

correcting the photometric function for<br />

lunar curvature effects that are present to<br />

some extent in the telescopic five filter<br />

images. The results of the relative<br />

calibration are compared to Clementine<br />

false color and ratio images.<br />

Introduction<br />

The Clementine orbiter took a series of<br />

UVVIS and NIR filter images of the lunar<br />

surface. These images were obtained at<br />

standard geometry (i.e. bidirectional<br />

reflectance with e=30 degrees and i=0<br />

degrees). It took professional astronomers<br />

years to achieve an absolute calibration of<br />

these filter images. The absolute<br />

calibration addressed not only radiometric<br />

and photometric considerations but also

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!