dispersal of ticks and tick borne diseases by birds - Lista fuglestasjon
dispersal of ticks and tick borne diseases by birds - Lista fuglestasjon
dispersal of ticks and tick borne diseases by birds - Lista fuglestasjon
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
small fraction <strong>of</strong> these would be<br />
transported from TBE-endemic areas.<br />
TBE is maintained in nature <strong>by</strong> a fragile<br />
enzootic transmission cycle (R<strong>and</strong>olph<br />
<strong>and</strong> Rogers, 2000), when larvae contract<br />
the virus <strong>by</strong> co-feeding with TBEinfected<br />
nymphs on small rodents. The<br />
transovarial transmission <strong>of</strong> TBEV is<br />
low: only about 2.4-7.8% <strong>of</strong> larvae born<br />
from an infected female are themselves<br />
infected (Danielová <strong>and</strong> Holubová,<br />
1991; R<strong>and</strong>olph, 2008). Therefore,<br />
questing larvae <strong>of</strong> I. ricinus rarely carry<br />
TBEV. Considering the large number <strong>of</strong><br />
larvae imported, there is a possibility<br />
that <strong>birds</strong> can import TBEV-infected <strong>tick</strong><br />
larvae, which, after moulting to nymphs,<br />
could spread the virus further to local<br />
larva. Furthermore, infected nymphs<br />
imported to Norway could mature to the<br />
adult stage, <strong>and</strong> <strong>by</strong> transovarial<br />
transmission give birth to TBEVinfected<br />
larvae. Therefore, it is a small<br />
possibility that <strong>birds</strong> could spread<br />
TBEV, <strong>and</strong> it is difficult to imagine any<br />
other way the virus could have reached<br />
the southern Norwegian coast. Although<br />
the enzootic transmission cyclus is<br />
fragile, a climate model predicting the<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> TBE (R<strong>and</strong>olph 2001)<br />
indicated favourable conditions at the<br />
Agder coast. Therefore, in principle, one<br />
single TBEV-infected <strong>tick</strong> could<br />
introduce the disease. The next question<br />
would be: why has this not happened<br />
before? TBE may well have been<br />
unrecognised in Norway for many years,<br />
<strong>and</strong> it may have died out because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fragile enzootic transmission cyclus <strong>and</strong><br />
been reintroduced <strong>by</strong> <strong>birds</strong>, or it may<br />
have been introduced during the last<br />
decades because TBEV is increasing in<br />
Europe. Traavik et al. (1978) reported<br />
TBEV in <strong><strong>tick</strong>s</strong> from Western Norway,<br />
but this may have been LIV, as the<br />
identification was made <strong>by</strong><br />
immunological methods. Traavik (1979)<br />
also found TBEV-antibodies in 19.6% <strong>of</strong><br />
humans living in areas where I. ricinus<br />
occurs in Western Norway, but this may<br />
be due to cross-reacting antibodies. One<br />
Norwegian woman (a patient <strong>of</strong> Gunnar<br />
Hasle) had serous meningitis when she<br />
39<br />
lived in Risør (at the coast <strong>of</strong> East Agder,<br />
Norway) in 1987. At the time she had not<br />
been in any known area where TBE occurs,<br />
but Risør is at the coast <strong>of</strong> Aust Agder, near<br />
areas where TBE has later been found, <strong>and</strong><br />
where LI has not been reported. She was<br />
examined at Ullevål University hospital for<br />
sequelae <strong>and</strong> was tested for TBE-antibodies<br />
in 2001. TBEV IgG was strongly positive.<br />
She had not had any other meningitis or<br />
encephalitis since 1987, <strong>and</strong> had not been in<br />
any area where TBE is known to occur. This<br />
may be the first case <strong>of</strong> TBE in Norway,<br />
although the first <strong>of</strong>ficially notified case was<br />
in 1998. The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>birds</strong> in the<br />
epidemiology <strong>of</strong> TBE is still unknown. It has<br />
been isolated from I. uriae <strong>and</strong> tissue from<br />
guillemot (Uria aalge) in the Murmansk area<br />
(Chastel 1988). LI, which is closely related to<br />
TBE <strong>and</strong> may cause disease in humans<br />
(Davidson et al., 1991), has been found in<br />
Western Norway (Stuen 1996). Nucleotide<br />
sequence analyses indicate that LIV has been<br />
recently transported to Norway from the<br />
British Isles (Gao et al., 11993).)<br />
An alternative explanation to transport <strong>by</strong><br />
<strong>birds</strong> is that TBEV has existed in the<br />
Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian peninsula since Sweden <strong>and</strong><br />
Denmark were connected 8-9,000 years ago<br />
(Björck, 1995) <strong>and</strong> that the virus has lived<br />
unrecognised in a zoonotic cycle.<br />
Phylogenetic analyses indicate time points <strong>of</strong><br />
divergence <strong>of</strong> W-TBEV <strong>and</strong> FE-TBEV <strong>of</strong><br />
400 <strong>and</strong> 600 years before present (Zanotto,<br />
1996; Haglund, 2000), which indicates a<br />
much more recent exchange <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
material across the sea. The TBEV strain<br />
found in Norway is phylogenetically closely<br />
related to the strains found in northern<br />
continental Europe (Skarpaas et al., 2006).<br />
This study has not proven that <strong>birds</strong> have<br />
introduced TBEV to Norway, but it can be<br />
concluded that it is possible that such<br />
transport has happened <strong>and</strong> that this is the<br />
most parsimonious explanation for the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> TBEV north <strong>of</strong> the Skagerrak<br />
Sea.<br />
Originally, the blood sampling from dairy<br />
cows (Paper IV) was intended to be a study<br />
<strong>of</strong> mapping the distribution <strong>of</strong> TBEV <strong>by</strong>