19.06.2013 Views

Download PDF version of article - UCL

Download PDF version of article - UCL

Download PDF version of article - UCL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 KAREN RADNER<br />

Shalmaneser III <strong>of</strong> Assyria (858-824 BC) deemed a visit to worship at the ‘Tigris source’ so important that he<br />

had his army take a detour on its march back from inner Anatolia to Assyria in 852 BC; he and his predecessor<br />

Tiglath-pileser I (1114-1076 BC) are known to have sacrificed at the ‘Tigris source’ and both had inscriptions<br />

and images fashioned at the site. 175 Furthermore his visit was illustrated in an exceptional double register<br />

depiction on the Balawat Gates (Fig. 17.09).<br />

Fig. 17.09. The Tigris Grotto depicted on Band X <strong>of</strong> the Balawat Gates <strong>of</strong> Shalmaneser III.<br />

Drawn by Cornelie Wolff.<br />

Assyrian practice and the fact that the Tigris was considered a major deity in the Hurrian world lead us<br />

to conclude that the ‘Tigris source’ was as famous and important a sanctuary as the temples <strong>of</strong> Haldi at Musasir<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the storm god at Kumme. It may be significant, then, that Esarhaddon composed a Letter to Assur,<br />

detailing the invasion <strong>of</strong> Subria, just as Sargon had done after the capture <strong>of</strong> Musasir and the looting <strong>of</strong> Haldi’s<br />

temple, the only other well-known example <strong>of</strong> this text genre. Esarhaddon’s text is broken where we expect<br />

the account <strong>of</strong> the invasion <strong>of</strong> Subria, but the spoils taken from that country are later given to the gods <strong>of</strong><br />

Assyria, and at least part <strong>of</strong> these riches must have originated from Subrian sanctuaries.<br />

Is it coincidence that both the sack <strong>of</strong> Musasir and the invasion <strong>of</strong> Subria are reported to Assyria’s divine<br />

overlord in a Letter to Assur, or is this the direct result <strong>of</strong> the underlying similarities between the cases – an<br />

existing alliance with Assyria, secured by a treaty, broken; a sanctuary sacred to and frequented by the Assyrians<br />

violated – that may have required the composition <strong>of</strong> such an account which one might then interpret<br />

as a defence statement forwarded to the divine court <strong>of</strong> law which decided the fate <strong>of</strong> all according to the<br />

Mesopotamian world view? How we see this matter influences how we judge the significance <strong>of</strong> Sargon’s and<br />

Esarhaddon’s actions in Musasir and Subria – and the importance <strong>of</strong> the ancient Hurrian cult centres in the<br />

wider world.<br />

175 For the Assyrian reliefs and inscriptions from the ‘Tigris source’ see the contributions <strong>of</strong> Radner and Schachner in Schachner (Hrsg.)<br />

2009.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!