24.06.2013 Views

Orthopedic Coder's Pink Sheet - DecisionHealth Store

Orthopedic Coder's Pink Sheet - DecisionHealth Store

Orthopedic Coder's Pink Sheet - DecisionHealth Store

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Orthopedic</strong><br />

Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

In ThIs Issue<br />

Proposed ICD-9 2011 changes:<br />

Look for new stenosis, nerve tumor and<br />

blood type incompatibility codes .......................... 1<br />

FAI:<br />

UHC joins list of payers covering surgery<br />

to treat condition ................................................ 2<br />

‘Doc fix’ update:<br />

21% Medicare cut now postponed until June ...... 3<br />

CCI 16.1:<br />

Look for new edits for fluoro,<br />

artificial disk implant .......................................... 4<br />

Health reform law:<br />

Here’s a summary list of how it will<br />

impact your practice ........................................... 6<br />

Ask Margie:<br />

Coding a hemi-to-total knee replacement ............ 7<br />

Aspiration and injection in same joint .................. 8<br />

Physician Tip<strong>Sheet</strong>:<br />

List of proposed new, invalid and revised<br />

ICD-9 codes for 2011 .................................. Insert<br />

Ceu APProved<br />

Ortho-Decisions.com<br />

Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> sheet • 9737 Washingtonian Blvd., Ste. 100, Gaithersburg, MD 20878-7364 • 1-877-602-3835<br />

Essential news and guidance to solve your<br />

toughest speciality coding challenges<br />

MAY 2010 | Vol. 11, Issue 5<br />

Proposed ICd-9 2011 changes:<br />

Look for new stenosis, nerve tumor codes<br />

When coding for lumbar spinal stenosis, you could soon be<br />

able to document the presence of neurogenic claudication, according<br />

to new ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes proposed for implementation<br />

on Oct. 1. Among the list of 141 proposed code changes are<br />

a new code for lumbar spinal stenosis that includes neurogenic<br />

claudication and one revised code without claudication.<br />

Proposed ICD-9 changes were introduced in the proposed<br />

hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) rule, which<br />

CMS released April 19. The final list of diagnosis code changes will<br />

be released in July and take effect Oct. 1 this year.<br />

The changes, which include 121 new, 11 invalidated and nine<br />

revised codes, add new diagnoses covering a wide range of conditions,<br />

including nerve tumors and retained fragments of foreign<br />

bodies, as well as blood type incompatibility, multiple pregnancies,<br />

cognitive deficits and extreme obesity (see full list of changes,<br />

included as this month’s Physician Tip<strong>Sheet</strong>).<br />

For the stenosis codes, the proposed changes include:<br />

• revised code 724.02 (spinal stenosis, other than cervical,<br />

lumbar region, without neurogenic claudication [includes<br />

not otherwise specified]); and<br />

• new code 724.03 (spinal stenosis, other than cervical,<br />

lumbar region, with neurogenic claudication).<br />

The change was requested by Andelle Teng, MD, a spine and<br />

orthopedic surgeon in Auburn, Wash., who told the ICD-9-CM<br />

Coordination and Maintenance Committee – which maintains<br />

the code set – that a patient may have lumbar stenosis either with<br />

or without neurogenic claudication. Lumbar stenosis is simply<br />

defined as a narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal, which does<br />

not imply a symptomatic or surgical condition (i.e., neurogenic<br />

claudication), Teng states.<br />

However, if stenosis at a single level becomes severe enough, or<br />

if the nerves are being compressed by multiple levels of stenosis,<br />

a patient may become symptomatic and experience neurogenic<br />

claudication, which is a possible surgical condition, according to


May 2010 <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

Teng’s code request. Symptoms of neurogenic claudication<br />

include buttock and lower extremity cramping, pain and<br />

fatigue, exacerbated by standing erect.<br />

Nerve tumors: You’ll have two new codes in the series<br />

for neurofibromatosis (237.7), a genetic disorder that<br />

causes tumors to grow along various types of nerves and,<br />

in some cases, other tissue such as bone and muscle. In the<br />

past, there have been two classified types of neurofibromatosis,<br />

and ICD-9 codes already exist for these:<br />

• Neurofibromatosis, type 1 (von Recklinghausen’s<br />

disease) – 237.71 – is distinguished by spots and/or<br />

nodules just beneath the skin, which can also lead<br />

to enlargement and deformity of bone and scoliosis;<br />

and<br />

• Neurofibromatosis, type 2 (acoustic neurofibromatosis)<br />

– 237.72 – can lead to multiple tumors on the<br />

brain and/or cranial nerves, and often affects the<br />

auditory nerve, causing hearing loss.<br />

Now, a rare third type of neurofibromatosis has<br />

emerged, called Schwannomatosis, and the ICD-9 Committee<br />

has a proposed new code for it (273.73). The<br />

additional code was requested by the American Academy<br />

of Neurology. Patients with this disorder may have multiple<br />

tumors on cranial, spinal and peripheral nerves, but they<br />

don’t develop vestibular tumors or go deaf, as in Type 2 NF.<br />

The ICD-9 Committee also proposed a new code<br />

(273.78) for “other neurofibromatosis.”<br />

Retained foreign body fragments: A series of proposed<br />

new V-codes allow you to document when a patient<br />

has retained fragments or splinters of substances that may<br />

have become embedded in the body. The codes were<br />

requested by the Department of Defense to identify materials<br />

from bombs retained by injured soldiers; however, they<br />

may be applicable to any injury resulting in embedded fragments.<br />

They are to be used as secondary status codes to<br />

primary injury codes, according to the ICD-9 Coordination<br />

and Maintenance Committee. However, you should not use<br />

these codes to describe implanted medical devices, such<br />

as an artificial joint or pacemaker.<br />

The list of proposed new codes for retained fragments<br />

includes: depleted uranium (V90.01); other radioactive<br />

fragments (V90.09); metal, unspecified (V90.10); magnetic<br />

metal (V90.11); nonmagnetic metal (V90.12); plastic<br />

(V90.2); animal quills or spines (V90.31); retained tooth<br />

(V90.32); wood (V90.33); glass (V90.81); and stone or<br />

crystalline fragments (V90.83), among others.<br />

2<br />

Any embedded object has the potential to cause infection,<br />

the ICD-9 Committee notes. In addition, an embedded<br />

magnetic object would be a relative contraindication for an<br />

MRI exam. Other types of metal, such as lead or tungsten,<br />

can also pose long-term toxicological risks.<br />

In this update, the ICD-9 Committee proposes an additional<br />

code (V15.53), for “personal history of retained<br />

foreign body fully removed.”<br />

Other proposed new diagnosis codes include:<br />

• new V-codes for “personal history of (corrected)<br />

congenital malformations” of various body systems,<br />

including V13.68 (personal history of [corrected]<br />

congenital malformations of integument, limbs and<br />

musculoskeletal system);<br />

• V49.86 (do not resuscitate status);<br />

• three new code series that describe different<br />

blood-type incompatibilities, including ABO incompatibility<br />

(999.60-999.69), Rh incompatibility<br />

(999.70-999.74) and non-ABO incompatibilities<br />

(999.75-999.79);<br />

• new V-codes for multiple pregnancies, including<br />

twins to quads and “other specified multiple gestation,”<br />

that allow you to code for the number of<br />

placenta and amniotic sacs (V91.00-V91.99);<br />

• V-codes that allow you to code body mass index<br />

(BMI) for extremely overweight adults, from a BMI<br />

of 40 to “70 and over” (V85.41-V85.45); and<br />

• new cognitive deficit codes ( 799.50-799.59).<br />

Official rEsOurcEs:<br />

Hospital IPPS proposed rule:<br />

www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2010-09163_PI.pdf<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835<br />

`<br />

`<br />

ICD-9-CM Coordination & Maintenance Committee:<br />

www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm_maintenance.htm<br />

uhC is latest payer covering FAI surgery<br />

An increasing number of private payers are electing to<br />

cover either open or arthroscopic surgery to treat femoroacetabular<br />

impingement (FAI), a painful hip condition<br />

faced by some young, active patients.<br />

Most significantly, UnitedHealthCare this spring announced<br />

it will pay for both open and arthroscopic treatment<br />

of FAI.


<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> May 2010<br />

“We are all dancing around at this office,” reports Kristi<br />

Stumpf, MCS-P, CPC, COSC, ACS-OR, coding and compliance<br />

supervisor, Proliance <strong>Orthopedic</strong>s and Sports Medicine,<br />

Bellevue, Wash.<br />

“We do 10 to 12 of these cases weekly, sometimes more,”<br />

she adds. That has led to a tremendous number of appeals<br />

and an “unbelievable workload surrounding this procedure.<br />

Finally, the tides are turning for us after years and<br />

years of a complete and total nightmare!”<br />

But while orthopedic coders celebrate the new UHC<br />

policy, the battle is not over, Stumpf says. For example,<br />

even if a big insurance company says it will cover FAI, the<br />

patient’s individual plan (e.g., an employer-paid insurance<br />

plan) may decide not to pay for it, Stumpf explains. “We’ve<br />

had that happen in a couple of cases. You really have to dig<br />

all the way down,” sometimes filing two separate pre-authorization<br />

requests to nail down payment, she says.<br />

That can also work to your benefit, however. For example,<br />

even though Aetna formally has a non-coverage policy<br />

for FAI, some of its private, employer-paid plans have opted<br />

to cover it, she says.<br />

The new UHC policy does not list specific indications<br />

or conditions when FAI surgery would be covered. It states<br />

only that “the best surgical outcomes are achieved in patients<br />

who have ALL of the following:<br />

• pain unresponsive to medical management<br />

(e.g., restricted activity, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory<br />

drugs).<br />

• moderate-to-severe persistent hip or groin pain that<br />

limits activity and is worsened by flexion activities<br />

(e.g., squatting or prolonged sitting).<br />

• positive impingement sign (i.e., sudden pain on<br />

90-degree hip flexion with adduction and internal<br />

rotation or extension and external rotation).<br />

• radiographic confirmation of FAI (e.g., pistol-grip<br />

deformity, alpha angle greater than 50 degrees, coax<br />

profunda and/or acetabular retroversion).<br />

• do not have advanced osteoarthritis (i.e., Tönnis<br />

grade 2 or 3) and/or severe cartilage damage (i.e.,<br />

Outerbridge grade III or IV).”<br />

Stumpf says the UHC FAI policy is similar to other<br />

payers’ published policies for the procedure; they are all<br />

vague. She states the condition itself may present differently<br />

in different patients – the problem doesn’t always show up<br />

on X-rays or MRIs, for example.<br />

However most FAI patients fit a distinct pattern of not<br />

being able to sit without pain because of bones abutting<br />

against soft tissue, she says. From her experience, “what<br />

payers really do want to see is that the patient did not<br />

just walk in the door and you took them right to the OR,”<br />

Stumpf explains. “They expect you to have attempted palliative<br />

care at a bare minimum.”<br />

UHC joins a growing list of commercial payers now<br />

covering surgical intervention for FAI. CIGNA, Blue Cross<br />

Blue Shield of North Carolina and Empire Blue Cross Blue<br />

Shield (New York) have recently joined the list of payers<br />

that say they will cover the procedure. Regence Blue Cross/<br />

Blue Shield (Idaho, Oregon, Utah and some counties in<br />

Washington) and First Choice of Washington were among<br />

the first payers to cover FAI surgery (see OCPS, 9/09).<br />

Medicare has no national coverage policy for FAI and<br />

lists no local coverage policies for it. FAI is generally prevalent<br />

among young, active patients, who don’t tend to be<br />

Medicare beneficiaries.<br />

Until CPT ® issues new codes for FAI surgeries (expected<br />

as early as next year), most payers are directing you to<br />

use 27299 for open treatment or 29999 for arthroscopic<br />

FAI. There is no specific diagnosis code, so you’re likely left<br />

with 718.85 (other joint derangement, NEC).<br />

Official rEsOurcEs:<br />

` Carrier FAI policies<br />

` UHC: http://tinyurl.com/UHC-FAI-Policy<br />

` CIGNA: http://tinyurl.com/CIGNA-FAI-Policy<br />

` Empire BCBS: http://tinyurl.com/EmpireBCBS-FAI-Policy<br />

` BCBS of North Carolina: http://tinyurl.com/BCBSofNC-FAI-Policy<br />

` Regence BCBS: http://tinyurl.com/RegenceBCBS-FAI-Policy<br />

President signs ‘doc Fix’ bill;<br />

21% cut averted until June<br />

President Obama signed, late on April 15, an unemployment<br />

benefits extension bill (H.R. 4851), which contained a<br />

measure postponing the sustainable growth rate (SGR) cut<br />

to Medicare reimbursements until May 31. Lawmakers in<br />

Washington must enact another pay-fix bill before June 1 to<br />

again prevent the 21% cut to physician Medicare payments.<br />

Claims with dates of service on or after April 1 had been<br />

frozen by CMS to prevent practices from being paid at the<br />

lower rate. However, that claims hold expired at midnight<br />

on April 14. Medicare contractors had just begun process-<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835 3


May 2010 <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

ing these claims at the lower rate when the president<br />

signed the extension bill, so the 21% cut was in effect for<br />

less than 24 hours before Congressional action reversed it.<br />

It is unclear how many claims were processed at the lower<br />

rate, but CMS previously said these claims would be reprocessed<br />

automatically in the event of a pay fix, without any<br />

need for provider action.<br />

The pay-fix bill previously would have extended the<br />

fee fix until April 30, but this date was pushed back to May<br />

31 in an amendment by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. The<br />

amendment delayed passage of the bill, which had to be<br />

sent back to the House for a second vote. Fortunately, the<br />

House moved quickly to give its approval.<br />

CCI 16.1 tightens your coding<br />

of fluoro, artificial disk implant<br />

You’ll notice quite a few new code pairs bundling<br />

fluoroscopy into injections in version 16.1 of the National<br />

Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), which took effect April 1. In<br />

addition, you’ll see that the artificial disk codes are bundled<br />

into a number of other spinal fusion procedures, as is<br />

Category III code 0195T (presacral arthrodesis).<br />

On the nervous system side, look for new CCI code pairs<br />

involving the codes for injection or destruction of the plantar<br />

common digital nerve, e.g., Morton’s neuroma (64455<br />

and 64632), among other edits.<br />

Note also a new set of edits that will prevent you<br />

from getting paid for newborn care per-day E/M codes<br />

99460-99462 on the same day as a subsequent hospital<br />

care service.<br />

How CCI works: CCI is a form of claims processing<br />

software used by your Medicare carrier – and some private<br />

payers – to keep you from billing certain codes together<br />

(e.g., components of a surgical procedure in addition to the<br />

comprehensive procedure, or two codes that realistically<br />

wouldn’t be performed together).<br />

Correct Code Solutions LLC, Carmel, Ind., a CMS contractor,<br />

maintains the CCI edits and updates them quarterly.<br />

You can also review CCI’s policy manual (updated annually)<br />

for many of the rules behind the edits. The full list of<br />

CCI edits and the policy manual are available on the CMS<br />

website (www.cms.gov).<br />

CCI code pairs, or “edits,” affect codes you report for<br />

the same patient, performed by the same provider on<br />

4<br />

the same day. Within a code pair, Medicare will pay the<br />

“Column 1” (left-most) code. The code in “Column 2” gets<br />

bundled, or denied.<br />

A code pair with a modifier indicator of “1” means you<br />

can use an appropriate modifier (e.g., 50, RT/LT, 78, 58,<br />

59, 57 or 25) to override the edit. Modifier indicator “0”<br />

means you can’t. Many of these edits may be overridden,<br />

but be careful not to routinely override without documentation<br />

of medical necessity. Keep in mind CCI edits represent<br />

Medicare coding policy.<br />

Unless otherwise noted, the CCI edits described<br />

below all have a “1” modifier indicator, meaning the<br />

appropriate modifier may be used to override the edits<br />

when warranted.<br />

Musculoskeletal<br />

` Multiplane external fixation codes 20696 and<br />

20697 have the following imaging codes as Column 2<br />

components:<br />

• 76942 (echo guidance for biopsy).<br />

• 77002 (needle localization by X-ray).<br />

• 77012 (CT scan for needle biopsy).<br />

• 77021 (MR guidance for needle placement).<br />

• 77031 (stereotactic guidance for breast biopsy).<br />

` A number of new edits bundle cervical artificial disc<br />

arthroplasty procedures as column 2 components of spinal<br />

fusion to treat deformity and kyphectomy:<br />

• Posterior fusion of 7-12 segments ( 22802) includes<br />

cervical artificial disc arthroplasty (22856) and<br />

removal (22864).<br />

• Posterior fusion of 13 or more segments ( 22804)<br />

includes 22856, 22861 (artificial disc revision)<br />

and 22864.<br />

• Anterior fusion, 2-3 segments ( 22808)<br />

includes 22856.<br />

• Anterior fusion, 4-7 segments ( 22810) includes<br />

22856 and 22864.<br />

• Anterior fusion, 8 or more segments ( 22812)<br />

includes 22856, 22861 and 22864.<br />

• Kyphectomy codes 22818 and 22819 include artificial<br />

disc codes 22856, 22861 and 22864.<br />

` Artificial disc codes also received their own new<br />

Column 2 components:<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835


<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> May 2010<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Cervical artificial disc arthroplasty (22856) includes<br />

components 22505 (manipulation of spine), 62291<br />

(spinal diskography), 22220 (spinal osteotomy) and<br />

22600 (cervical arthrodesis, single level).<br />

Revision of cervical artificial disc (22861) includes<br />

components 22220, 22505, 62291, cervical fusion<br />

(22554 and 22600) and spinal fusion (22800, 22802,<br />

22808 and 22810), as well as 22856.<br />

Removal of cervical artificial disc (22864) includes<br />

components 22220, 22505, 22554, 22600, 22800,<br />

22808, 22845, instrumentation (22851), 22856, 62291,<br />

and diskectomy (63075).<br />

• Lumbar artificial disc arthroplasty ( 22857), revision<br />

(22862) and removal (22865) all have 0195T (presacral<br />

arthrodesis) as a Column 2 component.<br />

` Injection for elbow arthrography (24220) includes<br />

fluoroscopy codes 76000, 76001 as Column 2 components.<br />

` Buttock fasciotomy (27027) includes hip/thigh fasciotomy<br />

(27025) as a Column 2 component.<br />

` Don’t forget: It is never appropriate for a surgeon to<br />

report an anesthesia code for the surgery he is also performing.<br />

Look for new edits bundling 01400 (anesthesia for<br />

knee surgery) as a Column 2 component of all open knee<br />

procedures, from incision and drainage (27301) to amputation<br />

(27596). Similarly, anesthesia code 01404 is bundled<br />

as a component of lower leg amputation (27598). Also,<br />

anesthesia codes 01250, 01320 and 01400 are all Column<br />

2 components of knee arthroscopy codes 29866-29889.<br />

Note that these edits have a “0” modifier indicator.<br />

` Category III pre-sacral arthrodesis code 0195T is a Column<br />

2 component of lumbar spinal fusion (22630). In turn,<br />

0195T has the following new Column 2 components:<br />

• 22505 (manipulation of spine).<br />

• 22830 (exploration of spinal fusion).<br />

• 49000-49010 (abdominal endoscopy).<br />

• 62290 (injection for spine disk X-ray).<br />

Nervous system<br />

` Percutaneous aspiration of intervertebral nucleus pulposus<br />

(62267) has the following Column 2 components:<br />

• 10021 (fine needle aspiration w/o image).<br />

• 20220,<br />

20240, 20245, 20250 and 20251<br />

(bone biopsy).<br />

• 77002 (fluoroscopic needle guidance).<br />

` Fluoroscopic needle guidance code 77002 is a<br />

Column 2 component of 62268 (aspiration of spinal cord<br />

cyst) and 62269 (spinal cord needle biopsy).<br />

` Percutaneous disk decompression (62287) includes<br />

Category III code 0195T (presacral arthrodesis) as a<br />

Column 2 component.<br />

` Removal of implanted spinal infusion pump<br />

(62365) is a Column 2 component of 62360 (reservoir<br />

implant) and 62361-62362 (pump implant), all with a “0”<br />

modifier indicator.<br />

` Stereotactic spinal cord stimulation (63610)<br />

includes fluoroscopy codes 77002 and 77003 as<br />

Column 2 components.<br />

` Fluoroscopy code 77003 is a Column 2 component of<br />

nerve block codes 64510, 64520 and 64530.<br />

` Fluoro codes 76000, 76001 and 77002 are Column<br />

2 components of neurostimulator electrodes (64555) and<br />

nerve destruction codes 64600, 64605, 64610 and 64620.<br />

` Stimulator implant (64561) includes 76000, 76001,<br />

77002 and 77003 as Column 2 components.<br />

` Plantar common digit nerve destruction (64632)<br />

is a Column 2 component of 64640 (destruction, other<br />

peripheral nerve).<br />

<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Conferences<br />

Train your staff and keep your continuing education credits<br />

up-to-date with these live conferences and webinars.<br />

Bundling Intelligence: Achieving Maximum<br />

reimbursement for orthopedic surgeries<br />

speaker: Margie Scalley Vaught, CPC, CPC-H, PCE, CCS-P, MCS-P,<br />

ACS-EM, ACS-OR<br />

Wed., May 19, 1-2 p.m. ET<br />

www.decisionhealth.com/conferences/A1967<br />

2011 ICd-9 Codes: Learn how Key Changes Will Impact Your<br />

documentation, Coding and Billing – and Your Bottom Line<br />

speaker: Margie Scalley Vaught, CPC, CPC-H, PCE, CCS-P, MCS-P,<br />

ACS-EM, ACS-OR<br />

Thurs., May 20, 1-2:30 p.m. ET<br />

www.decisionhealth.com/conferences/A1957<br />

Advanced orthopedic Coding & reimbursement symposium<br />

Loews Philadephia Hotel, Philadelphia<br />

Sept. 12-15, 2010<br />

www.decisionhealth.com/orthopedic_coding_reimbursement<br />

For more information about all events, visit the websites<br />

listed above or call 1-866-620-5939.<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835 5


May 2010 <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

` Injection into plantar common digital nerve, e.g.,<br />

Morton’s neuroma (64455) includes the following Column<br />

2 components:<br />

• 29515 and 29590 (splint application).<br />

6<br />

• 29540 and 29550 (strapping).<br />

• 29580 (application of paste boot).<br />

• J2001 (injection, lidocaine hcl for intravenous<br />

infusion, 10 mg).<br />

Code 64455 is itself a Column 2 component of:<br />

• 64640 (injection treatment of nerve).<br />

• 64774, 64776, 64782, 64788 (nerve excision).<br />

• 64795 (biopsy of nerve).<br />

• 64820, 64831, 64834 (nerve repair).<br />

• 64890, 64891, 64896, 64895 (nerve graft).<br />

• 64905, 64907 (nerve pedicle transfer).<br />

• 64910 (nerve repair w/allograft).<br />

• 64911 (neurorraphy w/vein autograft).<br />

Evaluation and management<br />

` Subsequent hospital care codes 99231-99233 bundle<br />

newborn care per-day E/M codes 99460-99462 as Column<br />

2 components with a “0” modifier indicator.<br />

` Newborn E/M code 99460 includes 99462 as a<br />

Column 2 component. Also, code 99461 includes 99460<br />

and 99462 as Column 2 components. All edits have a “0”<br />

modifier indicator.<br />

health reform law extends therapy<br />

exemptions, shortens claims filing deadline<br />

CMS is moving to implement provisions in the Patient<br />

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the official<br />

name of the new health care reform law. Here is a brief<br />

summary of actions the agency has taken so far, as well as<br />

some of the other changes practices can expect.<br />

Agency officials estimate that changes affecting physician<br />

fees may take as long as 60 days to implement (even<br />

if they retroactively take effect Jan. 1, 2010), because of<br />

recalculations that will have to take place across all fee<br />

schedules (e.g., hospital outpatient), according to officials<br />

speaking on an April 13 conference call with providers.<br />

Therapy cap exceptions process extended (Sec.<br />

3103): Outpatient therapy service providers may continue<br />

to submit claims with the KX modifier, when an exception<br />

is appropriate, for services furnished on or after Jan.<br />

1, 2010, through Dec. 31, 2010. For physical therapy and<br />

speech language pathology services combined, and occupational<br />

therapy services the limit on incurred expenses<br />

is $1,860. Deductible and coinsurance amounts applied to<br />

therapy services count toward the amount accrued before<br />

a cap is reached.<br />

New timely filing deadline for claims (Sec. 6404):<br />

Providers no longer have 15 to 24 months to file Medicare<br />

claims. PPACA now requires practices to submit claims<br />

within 12 months of the date of service. That means a<br />

claim for any service provided to a Medicare patient in<br />

2010 will need to be submitted one calendar year later.<br />

CMS says it will phase the new law in with the following<br />

interim deadlines:<br />

• Claims for services between Oct. 1, 2009, and Dec.<br />

31, 2009, need to be submitted by Dec. 31, 2010.<br />

• Claims for services rendered before Oct. 1, 2009, will<br />

follow the previous rules for timely Medicare claims.<br />

The change is considered a fraud, waste and abuse<br />

provision, not just a change to make a provider’s life more<br />

difficult. Also, the new timely claims rules are not set in<br />

stone. HHS has the power to alter the timely claims provision<br />

in future rulemaking.<br />

Overpayments must be repaid sooner (Sec. 6402):<br />

Effective immediately, providers have just 60 days to report<br />

and return any overpayments they discover. Practices<br />

could face civil money penalties if the government can<br />

prove they should have known they needed to return<br />

money to their carrier.<br />

The work geographic index floor extended and the<br />

practice expense geographic adjustment revised under<br />

the Medicare physician fee schedule (Sec. 3102):<br />

PPACA extends a floor of 1.00 on geographic price cost<br />

index (GPCI) adjustments to the work portion of the fee<br />

schedule through the end of 2010, with the effect of increasing<br />

practitioner fees in rural areas. The law also provides<br />

immediate relief to areas negatively impacted by the geographic<br />

adjustment for practice expenses and requires the<br />

HHS secretary to improve the methodology for calculating<br />

practice expense adjustments beginning in 2012. Physicians<br />

in more than 50 geographic localities will likely see a small<br />

boost in their fees as a result of the GPCI adjustments.<br />

CMS will continue to review misvalued codes<br />

under the physician fee schedule (Sec. 3134): PPACA<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835


<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> May 2010<br />

directs the HHS secretary to regularly review Medicare<br />

physician fee schedule rates, including services that have<br />

experienced high growth rates. The law also strengthens<br />

the secretary’s authority to adjust fees found to be misvalued<br />

or inaccurate.<br />

Payment for bone density tests (Sec. 3111): PPACA<br />

restores payment for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry<br />

(DXA) services furnished during 2010 and 2011 to 70% of<br />

the Medicare rate paid in 2006. The American College of<br />

Radiology estimates this will increase the fee to about $98.<br />

Presumed utilization rate increases for high-cost<br />

imaging equipment (Sec. 3135): The presumed utilization<br />

rate (PUR) helps Medicare set the technical payment<br />

for imaging services in a non-hospital setting (e.g., physician’s<br />

office). In effect, a higher UAR tends to drive down<br />

the technical fee practices receive. PPACA will phase in a<br />

gradually higher PUR for imaging services, starting at a rate<br />

of 50% to 65% for 2010 through 2012, 70% in 2013 and 75%<br />

thereafter. The law excludes low-tech imaging such as ultrasounds,<br />

x-rays and EKGs from this adjustment. This provision<br />

supercedes the CMS rule requiring the rate to increase<br />

to 90% in 2013.<br />

PQRI changes (Secs. 3002, 3003 and 3007): PPACA<br />

extends the PQRI program through 2014 and allocates $75<br />

million for quality measure development. You’ll continue<br />

to receive bonus payments for quality reporting for another<br />

four years, but bonuses will decrease over time from<br />

current incentives of 2% of your overall Medicare charges<br />

to 0.5% of charges in 2012, 2013 and 2014. Providers who<br />

don’t participate in PQRI will see payments drop by 1.5%<br />

in 2015 and 2% in 2016, according to the bill.<br />

The bill also requires upgrades to PQRI feedback<br />

forms by 2012 and public reporting of participation in the<br />

PQRI program.<br />

In 2015, CMS will start to phase-in a “value-based<br />

payment modifier” to the physician fee schedule. The<br />

modifier will adjust your payments based on the quality<br />

and cost of care physicians deliver. You’ll start to see the<br />

program develop in 2012 and physician fee schedule rulemaking<br />

in 2013.<br />

Limitation on Medicare exception to the prohibition<br />

on certain physician referrals for hospitals (Sec.<br />

6001): PPACA prohibits physician-owned hospitals that do<br />

not have a provider agreement prior to Aug. 1, 2010, from<br />

participation with Medicare. Such hospitals that have a<br />

provider agreement prior to Aug. 1, 2010, could continue<br />

to participate in Medicare under certain requirements addressing<br />

conflict of interest, bona fide investments, patient<br />

safety issues and expansion limitations.<br />

A new independent payment advisory board<br />

(Sec. 3403): The 15-member board will be formed to act<br />

when Medicare costs are projected to be unsustainable,<br />

but it may not ration patient care, raise taxes or change<br />

premiums, eligibility or benefits. The board will look at<br />

trends and can recommend that Congress implement new<br />

payment models, such as pay-for-performance. Reports<br />

from the board will no longer be non-binding, as MedPAC<br />

reports are now. Congress must accept the board’s recommendations<br />

or modify recommendations in a way that<br />

doesn’t reduce their impact. The first of these reports is due<br />

in 2014.<br />

Contiguous body part discount rate to increase<br />

(Sec. 3135): The discount CMS applies to imaging services,<br />

such as X-rays, performed on contiguous body parts will<br />

increase in 2011 to 50% from the current 25%.<br />

Self-referral disclosure (Sec. 6003): PPACA adds an<br />

additional requirement to the Medicare in-office ancillary<br />

exception that requires the referring physician to inform<br />

the patient in writing that the individual may obtain the<br />

specified service from a person other than the referring<br />

physician, a physician who is a member of the same group<br />

practice as the referring physician or an individual who is<br />

directly supervised by the physician or by another physician<br />

in the group practice.<br />

Official rEsOurcEs:<br />

`<br />

PPACA section-by-section summary:<br />

http://dpc.senate.gov/healthreformbill/healthbill53.pdf<br />

` Health reform law timeline: www.kff.org/healthreform/8060.cfm<br />

Coding a hemi-to-total knee revision<br />

Question: Patient underwent a medial unicompartmental<br />

arthroplasty 19 years ago. He now presents with mechanical<br />

symptoms and pain. X-rays demonstrate poly liner<br />

completely dislodged and worn down to be bone on bone.<br />

Surgery is performed to revise the medial unicompartmental<br />

hemiarthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. As there is<br />

not a “conversion of previous knee surgery to a total arthroplasty”<br />

as there is for hips (27132), do we bill for removal of<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835 7


May 2010 <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

the previous prosthesis (27488) AND the total knee arthroplasty<br />

(27447)? What is the most appropriate way to code<br />

the procedures performed?<br />

Answer: This question was posed recently to the AMA,<br />

which checked with the American Academy of Orthopaedic<br />

Surgeons, then responded that 27482-52 (revision of<br />

total knee arthroplasty, with or without allograft, femoral<br />

and entire tibial component) would be the most appropriate<br />

code. You should append the 52 modifier (reduced<br />

services) since the code describes revision of a total knee,<br />

but you are revising only a unicompartmental arthroplasty.<br />

It would not be appropriate to use 27488 (removal<br />

of prosthesis, including total knee prosthesis, methylmethacrylate<br />

with or without insertion of spacer, knee)<br />

if you are putting another prosthesis in, according to<br />

the AMA.<br />

Aspiration and injection in same joint<br />

Question: Can I report 20610 twice in the same joint –<br />

once for aspiration and once for injection?<br />

Answer: No, you can’t. I am starting to see this error<br />

coming up in audits more and more for some reason. The<br />

CPT descriptor for 20610 reads: “Arthrocentesis, aspiration<br />

and/or injection; major joint or bursa (e.g., shoulder,<br />

hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa).” The term “and/or”<br />

in the description tells you the code “includes the performance<br />

of one or all of the procedures described in the same<br />

major joint or bursa,” CPT explains. “Therefore, code 20610<br />

should only be reported one time when both aspiration and<br />

injection are performed in the same major joint or bursa”<br />

(CPT Assistant, March 2001).<br />

Similarly, for knee or hip injections, at least, you also<br />

may not report multiple units of 20610 for multiple injections<br />

into the same joint.<br />

A few years ago, I asked members of the American<br />

Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons’ (AAOS) Coding<br />

Committee about separate reporting of injection codes<br />

to the shoulder during the same treatment session (e.g.,<br />

20610 to the glenohumeral joint and 20605 to the acromioclavicular<br />

joint). In general, they agreed that separate<br />

billing could be warranted if separate needles were<br />

used. In the shoulder, the AC and GH joints are separated<br />

by the joint capsule. By contrast, in the knee, once the<br />

solution is injected it will cover the medial, lateral and<br />

patellofemoral compartments.<br />

8<br />

www.ortho-decisions.com<br />

<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

` SubSCriber ServiCeS<br />

editor: Laura Evans: 1-301-287-2376 or fax 1-301-287-2916;<br />

email: levans@decisionhealth.com<br />

Contributing editor: Steve Brust, 1-301-287-2438 or fax 1-301-287-2749;<br />

email: sbrust@decisionhealth.com<br />

Technical Advisor: Margie Scalley Vaught, CPC, CCS-P, MSC-P, ACS-EM, ACS-OR<br />

vice President of Publishing: Tonya Nevin, 1-301-287-2454<br />

or fax 1-301-287-2151; email: tnevin@decisionhealth.com<br />

subscriptions: Direct questions about newsletter delivery and<br />

account status, toll free, to 1-877-602-3835 or email to:<br />

orthocustomer@decisionhealth.com.<br />

<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> Online – As a subscriber, you can read and<br />

download your newsletter electronically at www.ortho-decisions.com.<br />

extra Benefits: Search back issues by code or keyword, look up CPT ® codes and<br />

Medicare billing rules for CPT ® , HCPCS and ICD-9 diagnosis codes, and create<br />

printable pdfs of key billing and payment information. how to register: Visit<br />

www.ortho-decisions.com/register and fill out the online form. After that, just<br />

visit www.ortho-decisions.com as often as you like. If you have any problems or<br />

questions about registering, please call 1-877-602-3835.<br />

Free Internet Forum: To join Ortho-L, our free Internet forum for orthopedic<br />

practice coders, billers, managers and administrators, set your Internet browser to<br />

www.decisionhealth.com/ortho-l-enroll and fill out the form.<br />

Conferences: <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> holds seminars<br />

to help you meet coding and billing challenges. For program schedules,<br />

call 1-301-287-2684; email: conference@decisionhealth.com; or go to<br />

www.decisionhealth.com.<br />

Ceus: Each <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> has prior approval, through June<br />

2010, of the American Academy of Professional Coders (AAPC) for 0.5 CEUs.<br />

Granting of this approval in no way constitutes endorsement by the Academy of the<br />

program, content or the program sponsor. You can earn your CEUs by passing a<br />

five-question quiz delivered through your <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Decisions website<br />

(www.ortho-decisions.com). Once you have logged in, go to the “Library” page, find<br />

the issue and click the adjacent hyperlink marked “Quiz.” Log in to the Online Quiz<br />

System using your <strong>Orthopedic</strong> Decisions site userID/password.<br />

<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> is also approved for CEUs from the Board of<br />

Medical specialty Coding (BMsC) for up to 6 CEUs each toward the ACS-OR<br />

credential and 3 CEUs toward other ACS credentials. Contact BMSC directly for<br />

information at 1-800-897-4509; www.medicalspecialtycoding.com.<br />

reprints: To request permission to make photocopy or electronic reprints, call<br />

toll-free 1-866-265-0148 or email gbelski@decisionhealth.com and ask about our<br />

copyright waiver, multiple copy and site license programs.<br />

<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> is published monthly by <strong>DecisionHealth</strong>, LLC,<br />

Two Washingtonian Center, 9737 Washingtonian Blvd., Ste. 100, Gaithersburg, MD<br />

20878-7364. The price is: $450 per year. Copyright © 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong>.<br />

CoPYrIGhT WArnInG: Copyright viola tions will be prosecuted. OCPS shares<br />

10% of the net proceeds of settlements or jury awards with individuals who<br />

provide essential evidence of illegal photocopying or electronic redistribution. To<br />

confidentially report suspected copyright violations, call our copyright attorney<br />

Steve McVearry at 1-301-287-2266 or email him at smcvearry@ucg.com.<br />

CPT ® is a trademark of the American Medical Association.<br />

CPT© 2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.


<strong>Orthopedic</strong> Coder’s <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> May 2010<br />

Copyright notice<br />

It is illegal to forward this electronic version of <strong>Orthopedic</strong> <strong>Coder's</strong> <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> to anyone else. It is a free<br />

benefit only for the individual listed by name as the subscriber. It’s illegal to distribute electronically <strong>Orthopedic</strong><br />

<strong>Coder's</strong> <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> to others in your office or other sites affiliated with your organization. If this email has<br />

been forwarded to you and you’re not the named subscriber, that is a violation of federal copyright law.<br />

However, only the party that forwards a copyrighted email is at risk, not you.<br />

To confidentially report suspected copyright violations, call our copyright attorney Steve McVearry at<br />

1-301-287-2266 or email him at smcvearry@ucg.com. Copyright violations will be prosecuted. And<br />

<strong>Orthopedic</strong> <strong>Coder's</strong> <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> shares 10% of the net proceeds of settlements or jury awards with<br />

individuals who provide essential evidence of illegal electronic forwarding of <strong>Orthopedic</strong> <strong>Coder's</strong> <strong>Pink</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

or photocopying of our newsletter.<br />

© 2010 <strong>DecisionHealth</strong> ® • www.ortho-decisions.com • 1-877-602-3835 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!