You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
public has of us.<br />
Tuxedo Mask<br />
More importantly, you should be proud that you<br />
stood up fo r your convictions. /t may fe el like shit but<br />
what you did took courage and you 'll feel better in the<br />
end. HopefUlly you 'll inspire others to do the same and<br />
then we may actually get through to some of these thick<br />
heads.<br />
Dear 2600:<br />
I have yet to become a subscriber to 2600 (I buy issues<br />
with saved change') but I do buy every issue and<br />
it's all right. Just recently I was calling a friend and accidentally<br />
dialed the wrong number, so I hung up before<br />
letting it ring, and dialed the right number. I talked to<br />
him for about 30 minutes and had a nice chat. Immediately<br />
after I hung up, the phone rang and I picked it up.<br />
The call was from some paranoid person who has "69<br />
service for the sheer purpose of harassing people like<br />
me (or so I am convinced). She proceeded to be very<br />
rude with me until I told her that I was sorry and<br />
promptly hung up on her. Sure, I might not have fo llowed<br />
proper phone etiquette (because I hung up before<br />
I thought the call had been connected), but I don't think<br />
it was any place of her to try to call me back for 30 minutes<br />
straight until she got through, just to harass me.<br />
My friends and I, who are very moral and law abiding<br />
citizens, have been harassed several times by people<br />
who abuse *69. It seems like these people pay the extra<br />
just to get '69 so that every time the phone rings they<br />
can call back and harass whoever might have called. I<br />
have received several nasty calls from these paranoid<br />
people, and I'm frankly sick of it. I have a question, if I<br />
call someone, accidentally, and then they call me back<br />
and harass me about it, how is that different than if they<br />
just called me and harassed me? In my opinion, it is still<br />
harassment and it is pretty much the same as a prank<br />
call to me. I'm sick of paranoid people who abuse their<br />
'69 to harass me every time my modem accidentally dials<br />
the wrong number because I was in a hurry, etc.<br />
Can't people be a little nicer and maybe before they call<br />
me back accept the idea that maybe I wasn 't trying to do<br />
something "evil?"<br />
Zero_Null<br />
This is exactly the kind of altitude that is fo stered by<br />
promoting these confrontational services. Th ere is no<br />
longer such a thing as an honest mistake - everyone is<br />
out to get you and you have to he prepared with Caller<br />
ID, Call Return, and Call Trace. It 's really pretty sad.<br />
You can always hiock your outgoing calls with "67 if<br />
you can 't get the line itsell blocked. (Incidentally, you<br />
used the word harass (or a la rm ol it) eight times in a<br />
single paragraph. For your records.)<br />
Facts<br />
Dear 2600:<br />
Re your current issue, the editorial mentions a magazine<br />
called Signal. I wondered where I saw that name<br />
before" It was a magazine issued by the German gov-<br />
emment during the Nazi period, featuring pictures of<br />
victorious Gennan soldiers.<br />
bbiggins<br />
Dear 2600:<br />
I recently found this out while looking up the number<br />
for Microcenter to pick up the new issue of 2600. I<br />
looked at the front of the pbone book where they show<br />
pictures of things. They had a Caller ID box on there.<br />
The number on the Caller ID box was 513-555-2600.<br />
What you think? Hackers in the phone company? Or<br />
just a guess at numbers?<br />
Lord Mistieal<br />
Our agents are everywhere .... By the way, we 're<br />
shocked and appalled that you didn 't send us a copy.<br />
Dear 2600:<br />
Is it just me or are the eyes of Janet Reno (15:2) just<br />
like the ones of the orangutan (14:2). Could you be saying<br />
that Reno is nothing but a monkey when it comes to<br />
computers? (The quote on the inside doesn't prove otherwise.)<br />
Louis Blue<br />
Some things are just too frightening to talk about.<br />
Dear 2600:<br />
I recently bought a new "pen and paper Role-Playing<br />
Game" from a company called Eden Studios Inc.<br />
The name of the game is Conspiracy X I must say, it is<br />
an excellent game. But that's not the point. The point is<br />
this: as I was reading the book, I saw a disturbing picture<br />
on page 43. The picture is that of a hacker, sitting at<br />
his computer, with a can of Jolt cola and his mouse pad<br />
has "2600" written clearly on it. The disturbing part is<br />
the fact that the hacker has a bullet hole in his head, and<br />
the bullet went straight through his head and shattered<br />
the computer screen! Is this picture supposed to be antihacker<br />
in meaning? And if it is, why do these pro-government<br />
types write an RPG about conspiracies? If it's<br />
not anti-hacker, then what the hell is it? Did you guys<br />
know about it? It does bear your logo ....<br />
Vex Hardline<br />
And again, we 're shocked and appalled that you<br />
didn 't send us a copy.<br />
Metrocard Fun<br />
Dear 2600:<br />
I know that there has been a lot of curiosity as to<br />
how the MetroCards on the New Yo rk subway system<br />
work. Well, I have what you might call a social hack, although<br />
I haven't had the opportunity to try it yet. Since<br />
the new "unlimited" MetroCards have come out (you<br />
can ride 30 days for $63), the MTA has encouraged people<br />
to share them with family members and friends. But<br />
in order to prevent me from passing back my card to<br />
someone else right after I enter a station, there is a<br />
blackout period, which prevents the card holder from<br />
Fa ll 1998 2600 Magazine Page 51