29.06.2013 Views

Obstetric dimensions of the true pelvis in a Medieval ... - Anthropology

Obstetric dimensions of the true pelvis in a Medieval ... - Anthropology

Obstetric dimensions of the true pelvis in a Medieval ... - Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

426<br />

a. dolicopellic (long oval)-<strong>the</strong> anteropos-<br />

terior diameter exceeds <strong>the</strong> transverse di-<br />

ameter.<br />

b. mesatipellic (roundt<strong>the</strong> anteroposte-<br />

rior and transverse diameters are <strong>of</strong> equal<br />

length, or <strong>the</strong> former exceeds <strong>the</strong> latter by<br />

not more than 1 cm.<br />

c. brachypellic (transverse ovalt<strong>the</strong><br />

transverse diameter exceeds <strong>the</strong> anteropos-<br />

terior diameter by more than 1 cm but less<br />

than 3 cm.<br />

d. platypellic (flatr<strong>the</strong> transverse diam-<br />

eter exceeds <strong>the</strong> anteroposterior diameter<br />

by 3 cm or more.<br />

In addition, certa<strong>in</strong> obstetrically impor-<br />

tant morphologic features, not associated<br />

with measurement, were observed. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded l<strong>in</strong>earity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pelvic sidewalls;<br />

breadth, curvature, and <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sacrum; shape and breadth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sacrosci-<br />

atic notch; prom<strong>in</strong>ence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ischial sp<strong>in</strong>es;<br />

and curvature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pubic rami.<br />

Statistics<br />

Age at death and <strong>dimensions</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>pelvis</strong><br />

were described <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> means, standard<br />

deviations, and range values. In order to de-<br />

term<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r a differential size effect<br />

was operat<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample, all pelvic<br />

<strong>dimensions</strong> were correlated with femur<br />

length. No correlations were significant at<br />

P < 0.05 and, <strong>the</strong>refore, no fur<strong>the</strong>r attempt<br />

to statistically remove a body size effect was<br />

made. Comparison to o<strong>the</strong>r archaeological<br />

populations were made us<strong>in</strong>g Student's t<br />

test.<br />

RESULTS<br />

General description<br />

From <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> shape, 58% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pelves were classifiable as brachypellic<br />

(transverse oval), 28% mesatipellic (round),<br />

11% dolichopellic (long oval), and 3% as<br />

platypellic (flat). Shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid<strong>pelvis</strong> is<br />

most <strong>of</strong>ten characterized by slightly conver-<br />

gent sidewalls (<strong>in</strong>dicated by greater <strong>in</strong>let<br />

than outlet transverse dimension) associ-<br />

ated with well-rounded anterior and poste-<br />

rior segments; well-curved neutrally <strong>in</strong>-<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ed sacra; and well-rounded and wide<br />

sacrosciatic notches associated with ischial<br />

L. M. SIBLEY ET AL.<br />

TABLE I. <strong>Obstetric</strong> dzmensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kulubnarti Delves<br />

Pelvic Inlet<br />

Anteroposterior<br />

Transverse<br />

Oblique Left<br />

Oblique Right<br />

Pelvic Midplane<br />

Anteroposterior<br />

Transverse<br />

Posterior Sagittal<br />

Pelvic Outlet<br />

Anteroposterior<br />

Transverse<br />

Subpubic Angle'<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

36<br />

10.3<br />

11.6<br />

11.3<br />

11.1<br />

11.5<br />

9.1<br />

4.3<br />

11.1<br />

9.7<br />

82.0<br />

0.75<br />

0.74<br />

0.55<br />

0.52<br />

0.70<br />

0.73<br />

0.70<br />

0.71<br />

0.87<br />

7.80<br />

8.6-1 2.0<br />

10.5-14.1<br />

10.2-12.9<br />

10.1-12.2<br />

10.4-13.2<br />

7.8-1 0.5<br />

3.1-5.9<br />

9.8-12.1<br />

8.4-12.1<br />

64.0-97.0<br />

TABLE 2. Kulubnarti pelves compared with American<br />

obstetric standard.s<br />

%<br />

US US Kulubnarti<br />

<strong>Obstetric</strong> Dimensions Normal Contracted Contracted<br />

Pelvic Inlet<br />

Anteroposterior 10.5 40.0 33%<br />

Transverse 13.5 42.0 67%<br />

Oblique Left 12.5 - -<br />

Oblique Right<br />

Pelvic Midplane<br />

12.5 - -<br />

Anteroposterior 11.5 - -<br />

Transverse (a) 10.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!