1 A Study of Logo Form, Tone and Attribute Preferences ... - ANZMAC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

transactions. Future research should test logo preference without any selected attributes to obtain less biased feedback. This is particularly important for the business stakeholders, possibly a more rational stakeholder group than other groups such as employees or PWDs (Lynch & De Chernatony, 2004). As a very important aspect of brand identity elements for organisations struggling to communicate effectively to their different stakeholder groups, we recommend SEAs embrace consultative logo design and carefully consider the ratings of attributes stakeholders attach to a logo design in addition to logo form and tone. In so doing, SEAs could more consistently affect local employer inclusivity of PWDs in the workplaces. References Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Corporate Identity and the Advent of Corporate Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management 14, 963-99. Bennett, P.D. (1995). Dictionary of Marketing Terms. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books. Bird, L. (1992). Eye-Catching Logos All Too Often Leave Fuzzy Images in Minds of Consumers. The Wall Street Journal. (December 5), B-1. Brandt, M. and Johnson, G. (1997) Power Branding: Building Technology Brands for Competitive Advantage, International Data Group Thought Leadership Series, San Francisco, CA. Durgee, J.F. and Stuart, R.W. (1987). Advertising Symbols and Brand Names that Best Represent Key Products Meanings. Journal of Consumer Marketing 4 (Summer), 16-23. Edell, J.A. and Staelin, R. (1983). The information processing of pictures in print advertisements, Journal of Consumer Research 10, 45-61. Fraser, T. and Banks, A. (2004) The Complete Guide to Colour: The Ultimate Book for the Colour Conscious, Ilex Press, London. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK ;New York, Cambridge University Press. Giberson, R. and Hulland, J. (1994). Using Logos as Cues to Recognition: A Preliminary Study. Working Paper Series 94-24. Western Business School. University of Western Ontario. Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2003). Bringing the Corporation into Corporate Branding, European Journal of Marketing 37, 1041-1064. Henderson, P.W. and Cote, J.A. (1998). Guidelines for Selecting Modifying Logos. Journal of Marketing 62 (April 1998), 14-30. Hergenrather, K.C., Turner, A.P., Rhodes, S.D. and Barlow, J. (2008). Persons with disabilities and employment: Application of the self-efficacy of job-seeking skills scale. Journal of Rehabilitation 74, 34-44. Hynes, N. (2009). Color and meaning in corporate logos: An Empirical study, The Journal of Brand Management 11, 261-64. Horsky, D. and Swyngedouw, P. (1987). Does it Pay to Change Your Company’s Name? A Stock Market Perspective. Marketing Science 6 (Fall), 320-35. Hynes, N. (2009). Colour and meaning in corporate logos: An empirical study. Brand Management 16, 545-555. Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing Measuring and Managing Customer –Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing 57 (January), 1-22. Kropp, H.R., French, W.A. and Hillard, J.E. (1990). Trademark Management- Not Brand Management. Business 40 (October-December), 17-24. Luecking, R.G. (2008). Emerging employer views of people with disabilities and the future of job development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 29, 3-13. Lynch, J. and De Cherantony, L. (2004) The power of emotion: Brand communication in business-to-business markets. Brand Management 11, 403-419. 6
McVicar, D. (2006). Why do disability benefit rolls vary between regions? A review of the evidence from the USA and the UK. Regional Studies 40, 519-533. Mitchell, A. (2003). Customers aren’t fooled by fake brand emotions, Marketing Week 3 rd April, 32-33. Morgan, H. (1986). Symbols in America. 6 th Ed, New York: USA Viking Morgenson, G. (1992). Is Your Product Your Advocate? Forbes 150, 468-74. Muzellec, L., Doogan, M. and Lambkin, M. (2003). Irish Marketing Review 16, 31-40. Neville, B. A. and Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 66, 377-391. Olney, M. F. and Lyle, C. (2011). The benefits trap: Barriers to employment experienced by SSA beneficiaries. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 54, 197-208. Perussia, F. (1988). Semiotic Frame: A Method for the Experimental Analysis of Images. Psychological Reports 63, 524-26. Peter, J. (1989) Designing Logos. Folio 18 (July), 139-41. Romaniuk J., and Hartnett. N. (2010). Understanding, Identifying and Building Distinctive, Brand Assets, Report 52 for Corporate Sponsors. Adelaide: Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science. Romaniuk, J., and Nenycz-Thiel, M. (forthcoming, 2012). Measuring the strength of colourbrand name links, Journal of Advertising Research. Romaniuk, J., Sharp, B., and Ehrenberg, A. (2007). Evidence concerning the importance of perceived brand differentiation. Australasian Marketing Journal 15, 42-54. Roper, S., and Davies, G. (2007). The corporate brand: dealing with multi-stakeholders. Journal of Marketing Management 1, 75-90 Sharp, B. (2010), How brands grow, South Melbourne, Oxford University Press. Siegel, L.B. (1989). Planning for a Long-Life Logo. Marketing Communications 14 (March), 44-49. Snyder, A. (1993). Branding: Coming Up for More Air. Brandweek 34 (December 6), 24-28. Spaeth, T. (1994). Do Logos Really Matter? Across the Board 31 (March), 51-53. Teasdale, S. (2010). How can social enterprises address disadvantage? Evidence from an inner city community. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 22, 89-107. Van Riel, C. and Van den Ban, A. (2001). The added value of corporate logos: An empirical study, European Journal of Marketing, 35, 428-440. Vartorella, W. (1990). Doing the Bright Thing with Your Company Logo. Advertising Age 61 (February 26), 31. Wathen, M. (1986). Logomotion: Corporate Identity Makes Its Move into the Realm of Strategic Planning. Public Relations Journal 42, 24-29. Whetten, D.A. and Godfrey, P.C. (1998). Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications. Woodside, A.G. (2010). Case Study Research, UK, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Yang, S., & Raghubir, P. (2005). Can bottles speak volumes? The effect of package shape on how much to buy. Journal of Retailing 81, 269-81. Zakia, R.D., & Nadin. M. (1987). Semiotics, Advertising, and Marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 4, 5-12. 7
Page 1 and 2: A Study of Logo Form, Tone and Attr
Page 3 and 4: professiional, frienddly) and emmot
Page 5: Variant (PMS Purple (P) & PMS Green

1 A Study of Logo Form, Tone and Attribute Preferences ... - ANZMAC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?