Prime Implicant

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Petrick’s Petrick Method Example (cont.): Use to delete redundant terms from P P = PP P + PP P P + P PP P + P PP P 1 1 1 4 4 3 5 + PP P P = PP P 5 4 6 1 1 2 2 3implicants Two minimum solutions: F F = = X + XY = P 1 P 2 1 5 5 2 4 6 + P P PP + PP P P + + P 4 P 3 + + 6 P P 3 X 6 2 2 3 3 2 4 4 4 3 5 + P PP + P PP P 5 6 5 4 P 6 2 1 3 3 5 2 4 4 3 6 + P PP + PP P P = a′ b′ + bc′ + ac = a′ c′ + b′ c + 6 ab 6 + P PP 2 3 6 3 Unit 06 26
Simplification of Incompletely Specified Functions Modify the Quine-McCluskey Quine McCluskey procedure Finding the Prime Implicants Treat Treat the don’t don t care terms as if they were required minterms. minterms Forming the Prime Implicant Table The The don’t don t cares are not list at the top of the table. Unit 06 27
Page 1 and 2: Unit 6 Quine-McCluskey Quine McClus
Page 3 and 4: Quine-McCluskey Quine McCluskey Met
Page 9 and 10: Determination of Prime Implicants F
Page 11 and 12: Determination of Prime Implicants E
Page 13 and 14: Determination of Prime Implicants
Page 15 and 16: The Prime Implicant Chart (2) Make
Page 17 and 18: The Prime Implicant Chart Example:
Page 19 and 20: The Prime Implicant Chart Sol(cont
Page 21 and 22: Petrick’s Petrick Method A techn
Page 23 and 24: Petrick’s Petrick Method Example
Page 25: Petrick’s Petrick Method Example
Page 29 and 30: Simplification of Incompletely Spec
Page 31 and 32: Simplification Using Map-Entered Ma

Prime Implicant

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?