30.06.2013 Views

ELECTRONIC MEDIA MANAGEMENT - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

ELECTRONIC MEDIA MANAGEMENT - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

ELECTRONIC MEDIA MANAGEMENT - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ELECTRONIC</strong> <strong>MEDIA</strong> <strong>MANAGEMENT</strong><br />

234<br />

owned in a market and on the total number that can be owned in the country<br />

as a whole by a single person or entity.<br />

Another ownership consideration has to do with the length of time a station<br />

must be held by an owner before it can be sold. Cross-ownership rules<br />

exist for newspaper-broadcast combinations.<br />

Deregulation’s largest impact on changing the face of the broadcast industry<br />

has resulted from the relaxation of the ownership rules. The oldest and<br />

best known was the duopoly rule, which was designed to prevent a single person<br />

or entity from owning more than one station in a market providing the<br />

same class of service. Consequently, no individual or company could own<br />

more than one AM, one FM, or one TV station in the same service area. This<br />

media-concentration rule served its purpose for many years. But the decline<br />

of AM’s competitive position in particular, and of radio’s profitability in general,<br />

led to its reexamination.<br />

THE PROGRESSION TO CONSOLIDATION, 1992–1996<br />

On September 16, 1992, a new duopoly rule became effective. The change<br />

allowed a single party to have up to three radio stations in the same market in<br />

markets with fewer than 15 stations. However, the three commonly owned<br />

stations could not exceed 50 percent of the total number of stations in the<br />

market. No more than two of the three stations could be the same class of<br />

service (AM or FM). In markets with 15 or more stations, a single entity could<br />

own up to four stations, no more than two of which could be AM or FM. In<br />

those markets, there was an additional requirement: the combined audience<br />

share of the commonly owned stations could not exceed 25 percent.<br />

Before the implementation of the new local ownership rules, many operators<br />

who were experiencing financial or competitive strain had entered into<br />

local marketing agreements (LMAs). Under an LMA, a station sells all or<br />

some of its weekly broadcast schedule to another station in the market, which<br />

uses the air time to broadcast content, including commercials, over the selling<br />

station. When the new duopoly regulations were adopted, they were<br />

accompanied by a new LMA requirement. It said that if an LMA exceeded 15<br />

percent of the selling station’s weekly broadcast schedule, that station had to<br />

be counted as an owned station for the station buying the time. For example,<br />

if FM station A bought more than 15 percent of the time of FM station B, FM<br />

station A could own no other FM station in the market because two was the<br />

limit in the same class of service.<br />

The ownership rule changes also affected the limits for the number of stations<br />

that could be owned nationwide by a single party. The 1992 multiple<br />

ownership rules increased the radio levels to 18 AM and 18 FM stations, and<br />

a further increase to 20 AM and 20 FM stations was permitted thereafter.<br />

The television multiple-ownership limit of 12 was unaffected by the 1992<br />

changes. However, the television rule depended upon the percentage of TV<br />

households reached nationally by commonly owned stations, with the upper<br />

limit being 25 percent. Therefore, if a company owned five television stations<br />

that covered 25 percent of the television households in the United<br />

States, it could not own any more. Special variations of the rule allowed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!