01.07.2013 Views

BULLETIN FOR INTERNATIONAL FISCAL DOCUMENTATION 2000

BULLETIN FOR INTERNATIONAL FISCAL DOCUMENTATION 2000

BULLETIN FOR INTERNATIONAL FISCAL DOCUMENTATION 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>BULLETIN</strong><br />

<strong>FOR</strong><br />

<strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong><br />

<strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

<strong>2000</strong>


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

<strong>2000</strong> Vol. 54 Num. 8<br />

ISSN : 0007-4624<br />

Título: MUNICH, A "CAPITAL OF GERMAN TAX LAW"<br />

Autor: Vogel, K. pg - 385-386<br />

Título: SUBJECTS AND SEMINARS OF THE <strong>2000</strong> CONGRESS<br />

Autor: pg - 387-388<br />

Título: DRAFT LEGISLATION ON THE FUTURE TAXATION OF BUSINESS<br />

ENTERPRISES IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Mattausch, H. E. pg - 389-396<br />

Título: THE TAXATION OF GERMAN PARTNERSHIPS<br />

Autor: Lethaus, H. J.; Mohr, A. H. pg - 397-404<br />

Título: VALUE ADDED TAXATION IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Reiss, W. pg - 405-413<br />

Título: <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> ASPECTS OF THE INHERITANCE TAX IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Piltz, D. J. pg - 414-416<br />

Título: THE ARM'S LENGTH PRINCIPLE IN GERMAN TAX LAW<br />

Autor: Wassermeyer, F. pg - 417-424<br />

Título: TRANSFER PRICING IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Baumhoff, H. pg - 425-433<br />

Título: GERMAN ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULES AND TAX PLANNING OF NON-<br />

RESIDENT TAXPAYERS<br />

Autor: Fuger, R.; Rieger, N. pg - 434-441<br />

Título: GERMAN TAX TREATMENT OF HYBRID FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS IN<br />

CROSS-BORDER TRANSACTIONS<br />

Autor: Jacob, F. pg - 442-454<br />

Título: ADVANCE RULINGS IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Eilers, S.; Schiessl, M. pg - 455-460<br />

Título: THE INFLUENCE OF EU LAW ON TAX TREATIES FROM A GERMAN<br />

PERSPECTIVE<br />

Autor: Lehner, M. M. pg - 461-470<br />

Título: GERMANY'S TAX TREATY POLICY


Autor: Krabbe, H. pg - 471-475<br />

Título: PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT IN GERMANY'S TAX TREATIES<br />

Autor: Runge, B. pg - 476-478<br />

Título: THE TAXATION OF INVESTMENT FUNDS IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Dehnen, P. H.; Groning, M.; Rhines, R. pg - 479-485<br />

Título: ECOLOGICAL TAX RE<strong>FOR</strong>M IN GERMANY<br />

Autor: Rodi, M. pg - 486-494


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

<strong>2000</strong> Vol. 54 Num. 10<br />

Título: TAX TREATY NEWS<br />

Autor: Vogel, K. pg - 502<br />

ISSN : 0007-4624<br />

Título: INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 15(2)(b) OF THE OECD MODEL<br />

CONVENTION: "REMUNERATION PAID BY, OR ON BEHALF OF AN<br />

EMPLOYER WHO IS NOT A RESIDENT OF THE OTHER STATE"<br />

Autor: De Broe, L.; Jones, J. A.; Ellis, M.; van Raad, K.; Le Gall, J.-P.; Torrione, H.;<br />

Vann, R.; Miyatake, T.; Roberts, S.; Goldberg, S. pg - 503-521<br />

Título: ARTICLE 26 OF THE OECD MODEL IN LIGHT OF THE RIGHT TO<br />

IN<strong>FOR</strong>MATIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION<br />

Autor: Schaumburg, H.; Schlossmacher, S. pg - 522-528<br />

Título: ENTREPRENEUR PACKAGE BILL IN THE NETHERLANDS: IMPORTANT<br />

CHANGES TO THE CORPORATE INCOME TAX<br />

Autor: Pijl, H.; Groeniger, F. O. pg - 531-536<br />

Título: CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS <strong>FOR</strong> LEVYING<br />

TAX IN ESTONIA<br />

Autor: Lehis, L. pg - 537-544


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

<strong>2000</strong> Vol. 54 Num. 11<br />

ISSN : 0007-4624<br />

Título: GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULES IN THE TAX LEGISLATION OF<br />

HUNGARY<br />

Autor: Foldes, G. pg - 558-564<br />

Título: TRANSFER PRICING IN CHINA<br />

Autor: Li, J. pg - 565-576<br />

Título: THE NEW VALUE ADDED TAX LAW IN LIECHTENSTEIN<br />

Autor: Seeger, N.; Jenny, C. pg - 577-582<br />

Título: REVIEW OF TWO RECENT OECD PUBLICATIONS ON TAX STATISTICS<br />

Autor: Messere, K. pg - 583-594


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

<strong>2000</strong> Vol. 54 Num. 12<br />

ISSN : 0007-4624<br />

Título: TAX TREATY NEWS<br />

Autor: Vogel, K.<br />

pg - 610-611<br />

Título: THE INFLUENCE OF THE OECD COMMENTARIES ON TREATY<br />

INTERPRETATION<br />

Autor: Vogel, K.<br />

pg - 612-616<br />

Título: THE INFLUENCE OF THE OECD COMMENTARIES ON TREATY<br />

INTERPRETATION - RESPONSE TO PROF. DR KLAUS VOGEL<br />

Autor: Ellis, M. J.<br />

pg - 617-618<br />

Título: DO WE STILL NEED TAX TREATIES?<br />

Autor: Easson, A.<br />

pg - 619-625<br />

Título: TAX ASSIGNMENT AND SUBNATIONAL <strong>FISCAL</strong> AUTONOMY<br />

Autor: McLure, C. E.<br />

pg - 626-635<br />

Título: TAX POLICY RE<strong>FOR</strong>MS IN GHANA<br />

Autor: Appiah-Kubi, K.<br />

pg - 636-643<br />

Título: DENMARK'S FAVOURABLE TAX REGIME <strong>FOR</strong> INWARD<br />

EXPATRIATES<br />

Autor: Ottosen, A. M.<br />

pg - 644-648<br />

Título: TAX ASPECTS OF TRUSTS IN ARGENTINA AND THEIR USE AS<br />

VEHICLES <strong>FOR</strong> RAISING CAPITAL<br />

Autor: Meloni, E. O.<br />

pg - 649-654


<strong>BULLETIN</strong><br />

<strong>FOR</strong><br />

<strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong><br />

<strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 1<br />

Título: <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> TAX ISSUES IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING WORLD<br />

Autor: Lodin, S.-O.<br />

pg - 1-7<br />

Título: DIVIDEND FLOWS: TREATY RULES OR THE PARENT-SUBSIDIARY<br />

DIRECTIVE? THE ITALY-UK EXPERIENCE<br />

Autor: Gazzo, M.; Fleming, N.<br />

pg - 8-16<br />

Título: FINLAND'S IMPUTATION SYSTEM UNDER THE PRESSURE OF<br />

GLOBALIZATION<br />

Autor: Helminen, M.<br />

pg - 17-21<br />

Título: FIRST COMPREHENSIVE "REMEDIAL" REVIEW OF NEW ZEALAND'S<br />

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX<br />

Autor: Maples, A. J.<br />

pg - 22-32


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 2<br />

Título: CURRENT ISSUES UNDER EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LAW ON CROSS-<br />

BORDER DIVIDENDS<br />

Autor: Schwarz, J. S.<br />

pg - 46-51<br />

Título: TREATY RELIEF IN SWITZERLAND ON OUTBOUND INVESTMENT<br />

Autor: Hull, H. R.; Teuscher, H.<br />

pg - 52-61<br />

Título: THE <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN-INCOME EXEMPTION IN SPAIN AND THE CANARY<br />

ISLANDS SPECIAL ZONE<br />

Autor: Palao, C.<br />

pg - 62-67<br />

Título: SUBSTANCE VERSUS <strong>FOR</strong>M IN TAX PLANNING: RECENT CASES<br />

INVOLVING THE RAMSAY DOCTRINE<br />

Autor: VanderWolk, J.<br />

pg - 68-73<br />

Título: REVIEW OF PART II OF RUSSIA'S NEW TAX CODE<br />

Autor: Astakhov, E.; Zhestkov, S.<br />

pg - 74-80


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 3<br />

Título: TAX TREATY NEWS<br />

Autor: Vogel, K.<br />

pg - 91-92<br />

Título: INTERPRETING TAX TREATIES - A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE<br />

Autor: Hausman, J. S.<br />

pg - 93-99<br />

Título: TRANS<strong>FOR</strong>MATION OF JAPAN'S CORPORATION TAX: 1988 TO <strong>2000</strong><br />

Autor: Masui, Y.<br />

pg - 100-106<br />

Título: CROSS-BORDER VALUATION <strong>FOR</strong> INCOME TAX, CUSTOMS DUTIES<br />

AND VAT<br />

Autor: Maisto, G.<br />

pg - 107-113<br />

Título: THE WINE-BOX INQUIRY IN NEW ZEALAND: ROUND TWO - A<br />

"GUTTED" REPORT BUT NO "KNOCKOUT PUNCH"<br />

Autor: Sawyer, A. J.<br />

pg - 114-125


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 4<br />

Título: PARTNERSHIP TAXATION IN SWEDEN<br />

Autor: Wiman, B.<br />

pg - 130-137<br />

Título: SOUTH AFRICA CHANGES TO A WORLDWIDE TAX SYSTEM<br />

Autor: Mazansky, E.<br />

pg - 138-146<br />

Título: THE TAX TREATMENT OF STOCK OPTIONS IN AUSTRIA<br />

Autor: Gahleitner, G.; Moritz, H.<br />

pg - 147-151<br />

Título: DID THE ECJ'S DECISION IN SAINT-GOBAIN CHANGE<br />

<strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> TAX LAW?<br />

Autor: van den Hurk, H.<br />

pg - 152-157<br />

Título: DEVELOPING A TAX COMPLIANCE STRATEGY <strong>FOR</strong> REVENUE<br />

SERVICES<br />

Autor: James, S.; Hasseldine, J.; Hite, P.; Toumi, M.<br />

pg - 158-164


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 5<br />

Título: THE NEW TRANSFER PRICING REGULATIONS IN JAPAN<br />

Autor: Okada, Y.<br />

pg - 170-184<br />

Título: THE U.S. TREASURY'S SUBPART F REPORT: PLUS CA CHANGE, PLUS<br />

C'EST LA MEME CHOSE?<br />

Autor: Avi-Yonah, S.<br />

pg - 185-188<br />

Título: THE FRENCH FINANCE BILL <strong>FOR</strong> 2001: SPREADING VARIOUS TAX<br />

CUTS<br />

Autor: Marrer, V.<br />

pg - 189-192<br />

Título: RECENT CHANGES IN CORPORATE TAXATION IN HUNGARY<br />

Autor: Toth, K.; Kurucz-Varadi, K.<br />

pg - 193-199<br />

Título: SINGAPORE'S BUDGET <strong>FOR</strong> 2001: TAX REDUCTIONS AND<br />

MEASURES TO ENCOURAGE INNOVATION<br />

Autor: Hong, L. F.<br />

pg - 200-202<br />

Título: DIVIDEND FLOWS: TREATY RULES OR THE PARENT-SUBSIDIARY<br />

DIRECTIVE? THE ITALY-FRANCE EXPERIENCE<br />

Autor: Gazzo, M.; Girard, J.-M.; Demenge, P.<br />

pg - 203-211


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 6<br />

Título: THE "ONE TRUE MEANING" OF A TAX TREATY<br />

Autor: Jones, J. F. A. pg - 220-224<br />

Título: ARGENTINA'S TAX TREATY NETWORK AND THE<br />

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF ITS TREATIES<br />

Autor: Atchabahian, A. pg - 225-232<br />

Título: WEAK-CURRENCY BORROWINGS AND THE GENERAL<br />

ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULE IN CANADA: FROM SHELL CANADA TO<br />

CANADIAN PACIFIC<br />

Autor: Duff, D. G. pg - 233-240<br />

Título: TRIANGULAR CASES, TAX TREATIES AND EC LAW: THE<br />

SAINT-GOBAIN DECISION OF THE ECJ<br />

Autor: Jimenez, A. J. M.; Prats, F. A. G.; Carrero, J. M. C. pg - 241-253<br />

Título: THE ECJ'S DECISION IN AMID AND ITS IMPLICATIONS<br />

<strong>FOR</strong> BELGIAN COMPANIES<br />

Autor: Dassesse, M. pg - 254-259


<strong>BULLETIN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> <strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2001 Vol. 55 Num. 8<br />

Título: TAX TREATY NEWS<br />

Autor: Vogel, K. pg - 319-320<br />

Título: PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED STATES-GERMANY ESTATE<br />

TAX TREATY<br />

Autor: Shannon, H. A. pg - 321-327<br />

Título: GLOBALIZATION, TAX RULES AND NATIONAL<br />

SOVEREIGNTY<br />

Autor: McLure, C. E. pg - 328-341<br />

Título: SOUTH AFRICA INTRODUCES CAPITAL GAINS TAXATION<br />

Autor: Mazansky, E. pg - 342-353<br />

Título: BELGIUM'S HOLDING COMPANY REGIME - THE<br />

DIVIDENDS-RECEIVED DEDUCTION AND CAPITAL GAINS<br />

EXEMPTION <strong>FOR</strong> SHARES<br />

Autor: Hinnekens, P.; Drijkoningen, P. pg - 354-360<br />

Título: AMENDMENTS TO DENMARK'S HOLDING COMPANY, CFC<br />

AND CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY REGIMES<br />

Autor: Ottosen, A. M.; Hansen, L. C. pg - 361-364<br />

Título: TAX INCENTIVES <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT -<br />

PART II: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Autor: Easson, A. pg - 365-375


2001 Vol. 55 Num. 9<br />

Título: OVERVIEW OF THE U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES OF<br />

DISREGARDED ENTITIES<br />

Autor: Rachofsky, D. J. pp. 388-396<br />

Título: THE U.S. <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN TAX CREDIT <strong>FOR</strong> CORPORATE<br />

TAXPAYERS<br />

Autor: Vacovec, K. J.; James, T. S.; Hoiberg, L. L. pp. 397-406<br />

Título: ADVANCE RULINGS IN THE UNITED STATES<br />

Autor: Triplett, C. S.; Maloney, J. C. pp. 407-416<br />

Título: TRANSFER PRICING IN THE UNITED STATES: RECENT<br />

EVENTS AND EXPECTATIONS <strong>FOR</strong> THE FUTURE<br />

Autor: Wright, D. R. pp. 417-426<br />

Título: SALE OF SHARES TO RELATED COMPANIES: THE<br />

SURPRISING TAX CONSEQUENCES OF U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE<br />

CODE § 304<br />

Autor: Brewer, K. pp. 427-439<br />

Título: <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN ACQUISITION OF A U.S. TARGET GROUP AND<br />

SUBSEQUENT RESTRUCTURING<br />

Autor: Patton, B. L.; Monette, J. pp. 440-453<br />

Título: U.S. INCOME TAXATION OF <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN INVESTMENT IN<br />

U.S. REAL ESTATE<br />

Autor: Streng, W. P. pp. 454-467<br />

Título: TAX AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF PRIVATE EQUITY<br />

INVESTING IN THE UNITED STATES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE <strong>FOR</strong><br />

NON-U.S. INVESTORS AND FUND MANAGERS<br />

Autor: Newberg, J. H. pp. 468-483<br />

Título: <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> JOINT VENTURES: SELECTED<br />

PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Autor: West, P. R. pp. 484-492<br />

Título: MAKING SENSE OF U.S. <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> TAXATION: SIX<br />

STEPS TOWARD SIMPLIFICATION<br />

Autor: Avi-Yonah, R. S. pp. 493-497


Título: U.S. TAXATION OF <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN CORPORATIONS IN THE<br />

DIGITAL AGE<br />

Autor: McIntyre, M. J. pp. 498-506<br />

Título: U.S. TAXATION OF E-COMMERCE UNDER SUBPART F -<br />

MISSING PIECES LEAVE UNCERTAINTY<br />

Autor: Glicklich, P. A.; Leitner, A. pp. 507-512<br />

Título: THE U.S. TAX INCENTIVE <strong>FOR</strong> EXPORTS - TO BE OR NOT<br />

TO BE<br />

Autor: Hammer, R. M.; Green, W. H. pp. 513-522<br />

Título: THE QUIET REVOLUTION IN U.S. SUBNATIONAL<br />

CORPORATE INCOME TAXATION<br />

Autor: Stark, K. J. pp. 523-531<br />

Título: CURRENT ISSUES UNDER THE CANADA-UNITED STATES<br />

INCOME TAX TREATY - A TEN-YEAR PERSPECTIVE<br />

Autor: Boidman, N. pp. 532-544


2001 Vol. 55 Num. 11<br />

Título: KEY ISSUES AND OPTIONS IN <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong><br />

TAXATION: TAXATION IN AN INTERDEPENDENT<br />

WORLD<br />

Autor: Guttentag, J. H. pp. 546-556<br />

Título: FIRST IMPRESSIONS FROM THE UNITED<br />

KINGDOM OF THE NEW UNITED KINGDOM-UNITED<br />

STATES TAX TREATY<br />

Autor: Jones, J. F. A. pp. 557-561<br />

Título: TAX TREATMENT OF STOCK OPTIONS IN<br />

DENMARK<br />

Autor: Pedersen, B. M. pp. 562-570<br />

Título: TAX CONCESSIONS AVAILABLE TO SMALL<br />

BUSINESS IN AUSTRALIA<br />

Autor: Hanegbi, R. pp. 571-579<br />

Título: TAX ASPECTS OF STRUCTURING AND<br />

DISPONSING OF INVESTMENTS IN MEXICO<br />

Autor: Fonseca, M.; Carcamo, L. pp. 580-586


<strong>BULLETIN</strong><br />

<strong>FOR</strong><br />

<strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong><br />

<strong>FISCAL</strong><br />

<strong>DOCUMENTATION</strong><br />

2002


, .<br />

APRIL 2002 <strong>BULLETIN</strong><br />

, CONTENTS<br />

ARTICLES<br />

VOL. 56 NO. 4 APRIL 2<br />

EU ANO US SALES TAXES IN THE OIGITAL AGE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS<br />

Charles E. McLure, Jr.<br />

This article compares the VATs in the Europear Unjan and the state sales taxes in the United States.<br />

The article first describes several key characteristics of an ideal sales tax and notes the inherent difficulty<br />

of satisfactorily implementing sales taxes levied by local governments. The article next explains<br />

the basic operation of the two types of sales taxes, and then describes the structural defects in the<br />

existing US retail sales taxes and the EU VATs, the economic effects of the defects, the inherent difficulty<br />

of taxing digital content, and the proposals for reform made in the European Unjan and the<br />

United States. In an attempt to explain the differences described earlier, the last part compares the<br />

historical development of sales taxes in the United States and the European Unjan.<br />

MAJOR ISSUES ANO CHALLENGES IN <strong>FISCAL</strong> RESTRUCTURING IN ASIA<br />

Or Chia Ngee Choon ,<br />

As Asia becomes more; integratedinto the world economy, the trade-offs between the benefits of integration<br />

and the costs of surrendering fiscal autonomy become important considerations for tax policy<br />

and tax administration. Fiscal restructuring refers to the need to re-examine the revenue-raising<br />

capacity of a country and its spending needs and to make 'the necessary changes. This article examines<br />

the majar issues and challen~s facing policymakers in Asia as they restructure their fiscal systems<br />

in response to ~xternal changes and their domestic fiscal needs.<br />

AUSTRIAN COURT RULES ON THE:TF;:iEATMENT OF CROSS-BOROER LOSSES UNOER TAX TREATIES WITH<br />

EXEMPTION~ErHOO ¡<br />

Geral~Gahleitner and Clemens Nowotny ,<br />

In a recent decision, AuStria's-'¡'ighest court for tax litigation dealt with the treatment of losses of a foreign<br />

permanent establishment\under a tax treaty which provides for the exemption method for avoiding<br />

double taxation. In its decision, which deviates considerably from the court's former rulings and<br />

indicates a new reasoning independent of EC )aw, the court concluded that a loss sustained by a foreign<br />

permanent establishment may be offset against the taxable profits of the head office in Austria.<br />

This article examines the court's d~~.iplJ. and analyses its impacto<br />

OUAL RESIOENCE CONFLlCTS ANO THE ELlMINA~IPN OF <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> OOUBLE TAXATION IN FINLANO<br />

Prof. Or Marjaana Helminen .<br />

A dual residence conflict may arise. 'there a Finnish national who resided in Finland moves abroad,<br />

but does not break all pis substantial Tles with Finland. According to the three-year rule in Finland, the<br />

Finnish national will be treated, for Finnish tax purposes, as a Finnish resident and subject to unlimited<br />

tax liability in Finland in the year of emigration and the three subsequent years. The new state of<br />

, residence will also treat the taxpayer, for its tax purposes, as a resident of that state from the time of<br />

immigration. This article examines the extent to which Finland eliminates international double taxation<br />

in these cases in both non-treaty and treaty situations.<br />

TAXATION OF NON-RESIOENT COMPANIES UNOER KAZAKHSTAN'S NEW TAX COOE ANO TAX TREATIES<br />

Sholpan Isakova<br />

The new Tax Code of Kazakhstan carne into force on 1 January 2002 and replaced the Law on Taxes,<br />

numerous tax instructions and letters of the Ministry of State Revenues which had regulated the interpretation<br />

and application of Kazakhstan's international tax provisions, including tax treaties. This article<br />

reviews the rules in the Tax Code on the taxation of non-resident companies in Kazakhstan, ana-;<br />

Iyses the general approach to interpreting tax treaties, and examines the principal changes made to<br />

interpreting and applying Kazakhstan's tax treaties.<br />

MINING IN ZIMBABWE: INCOME TÁX ANO WITHHOLOING TAX CHANGES "r<br />

D.G. Murphy<br />

This article discusses the significant income tax and withholding tax changes which were made with<br />

respect to mining operations in Zimbabwe by the Finance Act, 2001 and the Finance Act, <strong>2000</strong>. The<br />

changes apply to "mining operations", as defined in the Income Tax Act of Zimbabwe, and include,<br />

,<br />

_:;I~=t,!..."<br />

() @ 2002 International Bureauof Fiscal Documentation


, 'c',,:"'..i\¡~<br />

::.w~~:~t~ <strong>BULLETIN</strong> APRIL 2002<br />

"'.tcC" "<br />

'*"~~"!";r:,~,, -c"<br />

-;;..,t!!;;.¡:among other things, amendments with regard to the ring-fencing of taxable income and assessed<br />

, :\;'~~?SS~eSlrom mining operations, the deductions for capital expenditure, and the new prohibited deduc-<br />

I!I"~ bons.<br />

,"t.,-); ~<br />

"'h~',


v.2002 B~LETIN ""'"";"""" 1<br />

,~ q:c;;:<br />

ITICLES<br />

CONTENTS<br />

VOL. 56 NO. 5 MAY 20(<br />

PLORING CARIBBEAN TAX STRUCTURE ANO HARMONIZATION STRATEGIES 1<br />

Amos C, Peters<br />

This article explores the tax structure and harmonization strategies of the Caribbean Community<br />

(CARICOM). After the introductory remarks, the article summarizes the major elements of the CARI-<br />

COM Single Market and Economy, examines the concept of harmonization, and dlscusses the tax<br />

harmonization eftorts in CARICOM and the European Unión, including the lessons that can be learned<br />

from the European Union. The article al so considers the arguments for and against tax harmonizatlon<br />

in the context of CARICOM, describes the tax structures in CARICOM, and presents a policy framework<br />

and suggested strategies for harmonization.<br />

~Y TAX CORPORATIONS? 1<br />

Richard M. Bird<br />

This article examines the question of why corporations should be taxed -in particular, why taxing<br />

corporations may be desirable, may be necessary, and may be convenient. The artlcle also discusses<br />

how to tax corporations and, in the conclusion, the article identifies some important factors in determining<br />

what can and should be done with respect to reforming corporate taxes.<br />

ITICAL APPRAISAL OF TAX EXPENOITURES ANO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY IN<br />

STRALIA 21<br />

Hope Ashiabor<br />

Concerns about the threat posed to life and property by environmental degradation are increasingly<br />

taking centre stage in both domestic and international forums. The challenges PQsed by this threat<br />

have elicited varying policy responses from the regulatory authorities. This article IQoks at one aspect<br />

of that policy response, namely, the use of fiscal instruments by governments to ~hape the direction<br />

of their environmental policy. This article uses Australia's experience with tax expenditures and the<br />

implementation of environmental policy as a case study to provide a contempor¡jlry context for the<br />

analysis. The articles draws lessons from other OECO countries in suggesting rsfinements to Australia's<br />

tax expenditure rules.<br />

ROPEAN COMMISSION STRATEGY <strong>FOR</strong> COMPANY TAXATION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMtJNITY 2<br />

Jonathan S. Schwarz<br />

The European Commission recently presented formally its strategy for company ta~ation in the Europea<br />

n Union. The strategy was presented in a substantial and well-researched document which develops<br />

the general priorities established by the Commission in May 2001. This article discusses and<br />

comments on the Commission's strategy.<br />

VISEO CONOITIONS <strong>FOR</strong> TREATY REUEF IN SWITZERLANO 2<br />

Howard R. Hull and Hannes Teuscher<br />

This article updates an earlier article in the Bulletin and takes into consideration the favourable developments<br />

in Oecember 2001, when the Swiss Federal Tax Administration significantly revised and si mplified<br />

the Swiss domestic anti-abuse rules which apply when a Swiss resldent company claims relief<br />

from foreign withholdihg taxes on the basis of a tax treaty. The annex to the article serves as a summary<br />

guideline to the practical implementation of the new rules.<br />

IMULATIVE INDEX 2~<br />

o.' -~ 2002In .erna+¡'<br />

~ t lIt"<br />

onal Bureau01Ascal Documen+a.ion cc.."...<br />

,


~_~_~~~3 ,---,-_-<br />

I<br />

\X TREA TY MONITOR<br />

CONTENTS<br />

VOL. 56 NO. 6 JUNE 2002<br />

~X TAEATY NEWS 226<br />

Prof. Dr Dr h.c. Klaus Vogel<br />

JSTAALlA'S CAPITAL GAINS TAX ANO DOUBLE TAXATION AGAEEMENTS 228<br />

Prof. Aobert Deutsch and Nolan Sharkey<br />

On 19 December 2001, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) issued a ruling entitled "Income tax and<br />

capital gains tax: capital gains in pre-CGT tax treaties". In the ruling, the ATO concluded that Australia's<br />

taxation of capital gains under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Is not affected in any way<br />

by Australia's pre-CGT treaties (concluded before 20 September 1985, when capital gains became<br />

taxable in Australia). This article examines the ruling and points out the problems with the ATO's rea-<br />

soning.<br />

JMMAAY OF THE PAOCEEDINGS OF AN INVITATIONAL SEMINAA ON TAX TAEATIES IN THE 21ST CENTUAY 233<br />

Brian J. Arnold, Jacques Sasseville and Eric M. Zolt<br />

On 23-25 October 2001, an invitational seminar on the future of tax treaties wa$ held at the new<br />

offices of the IBFD in Amsterdam. The purpose of the seminar was to encourage t;'road-ranging discussions<br />

of the nature, raje and operation of tax treaties with a view to enhancing ~he understanding<br />

of tax treaties and identifying ways in which they might be improved. This article summarizes the discussions<br />

during the seminar.<br />

=tTICLE<br />

The appendix to the article contains background notes on the major topics discussed:<br />

-Jacques Sasseville, "The Aole of Tax Treaties in the 21 st Century" 246<br />

-Kees van Aaad, "Options for Greater International Coordination and Cooperation in thé Tax Treaty<br />

Area" 248<br />

-Michael J. Mclntyre, "Options for Greater International Coordination and Cooperation in the Tax Treaty<br />

A re a" 250<br />

-Aobert A. Green, "The Interaction of Tax and Non- Tax Treaties" 254<br />

-Eric Zolt, "Alternatives to the Existing Allocation of Tax Aevenues among Countries" 257<br />

-Klaus Vogel, "The Schedular Structure of Tax Treaties" 260<br />

-David Aosenbloom, "Comments on the Schedular Structure of Tax Treaties" 262<br />

-Hugh J. Ault, "Issues Aelated to the Identification and Characteristics of the Taxpayer" 263<br />

-Brian J. Arnold, "Taxing Business Profits" 264<br />

-Aobert Couzin, "Aelief.of Double Taxation" 266<br />

-John F. Avery Jones, "The Aelationship betwéen Domestic Tax Systems and Tax Treaties" 268<br />

-Jacques Sasseville, "Improving the Flexibility ot Tax Treaties: Part 1 -Generallssues" 271<br />

-Guglielmo Maisto, "Improving the Flexibility of Tax Treaties: Part 2 -Cross-Border Tax Issues arlsing<br />

from Corporate Aeorganizations" 272<br />

)ES THE AEACH OF THE EUAOPEAN COUAT OF JUSTICE EXTEND BEYOND THE EUAOPEAN UNjaN? 275<br />

Hans van den Hurk<br />

The recent decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the Jany case, which originated from<br />

the Netherlands, concerned the claim made by East European prostitutes -based on the association<br />

agreements concluded by the European Union with Poland and the Czech Aepubllc -that they should<br />

be able to work and settle in Amsterdam as prostitutes. This article considers, taking into account EC<br />

jurisprudence, the tax aspects of the European Economic Area Treaty in international tax law and discusses<br />

the purpose of association agreements. This article algo examines the tax aspects of association<br />

agreements, based on a case currently pending in the ECJ, which raises the question whether<br />

it is compatible with Commumty law for a Member Sta te (the Netherlands) to deny a tax deduction for<br />

interest paid in the Netherlands in connection with a foreign participation while, in the domestic con- ,<br />

text, the interest is deductible.<br />

lJMULATIVE INDEX 282<br />

~ ~tV\~ !~.~.~~.:~~~! ",. ._~_.. -~ M---! ,",- ~ --~-,-"--


I<br />

--<br />

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2002 ". <strong>BULLETIN</strong>, 345<br />

CONTENTS \<br />

: : VOL. 56 NO. 8/9 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2002<br />

lB F D<br />

ARTICLES<br />

INTROOUCTION TO THE 56TH IFA CONGRESS 348<br />

Jerome B. Libin<br />

SUBJECTS ANO SEMINARS OF THE 2002 CONGRESS 350<br />

OIRECT TAXES IN NORWAY -A BIRO'S-EYE VIEW 352<br />

Prof. Frederik Zimmer<br />

This article gives an overview of the direct taxes in Norway -the income tax, net wealth tax, payroll<br />

tax, inheritance tax and real estate laxo With regard to the income tax, which is the most important single<br />

tax, the article provides a brief historical background and summarizes the salient features of personal<br />

income taxation, including family taxation, the taxation of companies and partnershlps, and<br />

international taxation.<br />

THE TAXATION OF INCOME FROM CAPITAL VERSUS THE TAXATION OF EARNEO INCOME IN NORWAY 359<br />

Hakon L0chen<br />

One of the basic ideas of the 1992 tax reform in Norway was that, beca use capital is mobile, income<br />

from capital should not be taxed more heavily in Norway than in countries with which Norway compeles<br />

for capital. Another idea of the reform was that earned income should be taxed at progressive<br />

rates in arder to promote so me equalization of after-tax income. Complex problems surfaced when<br />

addressing the problem of how to tax enterprises run by the owners and other self-f3mployed taxpayers.<br />

This article sets out Norway's system for taxing capital income and the system for taxing earned<br />

income. The article also describes the allocation model and, in the concluding part, addresses the initiative<br />

taken this year to reform the reformed system.<br />

COMPUTING CAPITAL GAINS ON SHARES: A TEN-YEAR OLO -ANO SUCCESSFUL(?) -EXPERIMENT 364<br />

Prof. Ole Gjems-Onstad<br />

For ten years, Norway has conducted a unique experiment in taxing capital gains on shares. In<br />

English, the technique may be called the "Norwegian opening value adjustment method" or the "RISK<br />

method" (with a Norwegian acronym), which applies a kind of full imputation technique to the capital<br />

gains taxation of shares. The jury is still out concerning the RISK method but, at present, it appears<br />

most likely that the method will be continued. The final conclusion, the technological challenges, and<br />

the administrative costs of the system may warrant considerable interest from the international tax<br />

community and tax legislators in favour of the full imputation system for dividends. This article examines<br />

the RISK method.<br />

THE NOROIC MUL TILATERAL TAX TREATIES -<strong>FOR</strong> THE AVOIOANCE OF OOUBLE TAXATION ANO ON<br />

MUTUAL ASSISTANCE 371<br />

Odd Hengsle<br />

This article considers two Nordic multilateral tax treaties -the income and capital tax treaty for the<br />

avoidance of double taxation and the treaty on mutual assistance in tax matters. The article gives the<br />

historical background to the treaties and outlines their structure. With regard to the double taxation<br />

treaty, the article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of a multilateral tresty and describes<br />

the provisions of the treaty, including those of special interest. The article siso considers Norway's<br />

experience with the mutual assistance treaty.<br />

THE INHERITANCE TAX IN NORWAY 377<br />

Ivar Hobbelhagen<br />

This article summarizes the inheritance tax in Norway. The article discusses the tax model in Norway,<br />

the scope of the liability for the inheritance tax, the date the heir/recipient acquires a right of disposition<br />

ayer the asset, the method of valuation, allowances, international situations, and the expected<br />

changes in the law.<br />

.'. ) ); ¿ ~").c ;;<br />

, ).' @ 2002 Internatlonal Bureau of Fiscal Documentatlon )\!)' , ' !.,


~..,"" ~'1""<br />

This article describes the VAT system in Norway, originally introduced in 1970, and compares it with<br />

the EU V A T system, The article discusses, among other things, the sources and structure of Norway's<br />

VAT legislation, the tax mechanism, territorialscope, definitions, exemptions, taxable persons, tax-<br />

, able transactions, and exemption with credit (place of supply and zero-rating),<br />

'ERMANENT ESTABlISHMENTS AND ALLOCATION QUESTIONS PERTAININGTO THEM -JUDGEMENTS OF<br />

'HE NORWA y SUPREME COURT 392<br />

Eirik Jensen<br />

The Norway Supreme Court has, in a number of cases, been asked to clarify some issues relating to<br />

permanent establishments and the allocation questions pertaining to them, This article reviews the<br />

judgements of the Supreme Court that have addressed these issues, The judgements illustrate the<br />

basic attitudes underlying the Supreme Court's approach to these issues, which is notably characterized<br />

by a strong "substance over form" doctrine and a willingness to disregard the wording of tax<br />

treaties in favour of an interpretation based on other considerations..RANSFER<br />

PRICING IN NORWAY -THE CONCEPT OF ARM'S LENGTH CONDITIONS 401<br />

Einar Harboe<br />

This article looks at transfer pricing in Norway and the concept of arm's length conditions. The article<br />

discusses, a¡¡nong other things, the statutory ba~is for transfer pricing in Norway and the application<br />

of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines which, although not formal.ly introduced into Norwegian law,<br />

are assumed to be in line with Norway's internallaw.<br />

'AX ASPECTS OF NATIONAL AND <strong>INTERNATIONAL</strong> MERGERS IN NORWAY 407<br />

Marianne Iversen<br />

This article considers the tax aspects of national and international mergers in Norway. The article first<br />

describes leQal mergers under Norwegian company law and the tax aspects of such mergers. The article<br />

then loo~s at the different types of international mergers and discusses the Norwegian company<br />

law and tax ~spects relating to them. The article also mentions some of the major accounting aspects<br />

of national aQd international mergers.NCOME<br />

TAX REGIMES IN NORWAY APPLICABLE TO SPECIAL BUSINESS SECTORS 415<br />

Stig Sollund<br />

This article gjves a brief overview of the special tax regimes in Norway applicable to three business<br />

sectors -th~ production and pipeline transport of petrOleum, the production of hydroelectric power,<br />

and shipping companies. The main focus is on how the special rules contrast with the general rules of<br />

business tax~tion in Norway.<br />

"AX lITIGATION IN NORWAY 421<br />

Per Sandvik<br />

The method for resolving tax disputes in Norway involves an appeal system within the tax administration<br />

combined with a right to have the decision reviewed in the courts. This article gives an overview<br />

of the administrative system in Norway and outlines the procedure fol.lowed by the courts, The article<br />

also describes some of the distinctive features of the tax litigation system in Norway and the courts'<br />

way of decidlng tax issues. In the last part, the article points out the main features of Norway's new<br />

system for binding advance rulings in connection with tax issues. e;1,rHE<br />

CONCEPT OF RESIDENCE <strong>FOR</strong> TAX PURPOSES IN NORWAY 427 !<br />

Sverre Hveding and Finn Backer-Gr0ndahl<br />

This article examines the concept of residence for tax purposes in Norway and the interpretation of<br />

"resident" under Norwegian domestic law. The first part of the article outlines the requirements for<br />

establishing tax residence in Norway and for terminating tax liability based on residence (emigration).<br />

The first part al so considers the rules on the cessation of worldwide tax liability in Norway due to a<br />

temporary stay abroad. The second part of the article gives an overview of the proposed amendments<br />

relating to the concept of residence and the recently adopted amendments relating to temporary stays<br />

abroad.<br />

rAX ISSUES REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES IN NORWAY ANDrHEIR<br />

SHAREHOLDERS 437<br />

Sven Rune Greni<br />

This article surveys of some of the main tax principies in Norway which are important when examining<br />

the relationship between joint-stock companies and their shareholders. The article illustrates how<br />

these principies are interpreted in selected areas, with special emphasis on different kinds of transactions<br />

between joint-stock companies and their shareholders. Most, but not all, of the issues discussed<br />

relate in particular to one-person-owned companies, family-owned companies or group transactions.<br />

@ 2002 International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation .'. ..0'.' c.<br />

c


'"!'¡<br />

AUGUST/sEPTEMBER 2002 <strong>BULLETIN</strong> c' 347<br />

=~ ..~--, , , ,-- -.,."'" , c~._"-~ "--~"";',;" ---<br />

t" TAXATION OF SALARY VERSUS CAPITAL GAIN IN NORWAY OF PERSONS IN DUAL RELATIONSHIPS 448<br />

t Kristian Kvamme<br />

There may, at times, be a dual relationship between two or more taxpayers, such as an employer and<br />

an employee, If the employer is a corporation, the employee may both render services to the corporation<br />

and have an ownership interest in it. In these situations, the questlon may arise whether a<br />

payment by the corporation to the employee should be taxed as a salary or as a capital gain. How this<br />

question is answered is important for both the employee and the employer, This article looks at transactions<br />

involving dual relationships and how they are treated for tax purposes in Norway.<br />

DEDUCTIBILlTY OF INTEREST PAID ON PROFIT-PARTICIPATING LOANS IN STOCK COMPANIES 456<br />

Ass. Prof, Hugo p, Matre<br />

Corporate financing may take a number of forms within the bounds of company and contract law in<br />

Norway. The basic forms of finance are equlty and debt, but the company laws also permit hybrid<br />

investment forms with elements of both debt and equlty, one such form being profit-participating<br />

loans. This article examines the nature of profit-participating loans in Norway, the nature of the interest<br />

paid on such loans, and whether the interest is deductible for the payer for tax purposes.<br />

TREATMENT OF INBOUND AND OUTBOUND EXPATRIATES IN NORWAY 463<br />

Johannes Brennhovd<br />

This article considers various aspects of the treatment of inbound and outbound expatriates in Norway.<br />

The article discusses, among other things, the rules pertaining to residence and work permits,<br />

when a person becomes a tax resident in Norway, the income tax aspects, including the impact of tax<br />

treaties, vacation allowances, Norway's National Insurance Scheme, and tax planning for inbound<br />

t and outbound expatriates.<br />

t<br />

c<br />

~ i;i<br />

"<br />

r;[¡<br />

IMPLlCATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>FOR</strong> TAX SURCHARGES AND PENAL TIES IN NORWAY 474<br />

Morten Wishman<br />

In Norway, as in many other countries, surcharges are used as deterrents to tax fraud and evasion.<br />

Until recently, surcharges were not regarded in Norway as a criminal retribution in a legal sense and<br />

were used both as an alternative to criminal prosecution and in addition to it. The application of surcharges,<br />

however, may be contrary to human rights, depending on the legal systen1l in question. This<br />

articie discusses the areas where there has been and perhaps still is a conflict betwfJen Norwegian tax<br />

law and human rights as embodied in the European Convention on Human Rights iand the UN International<br />

Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.<br />

TAX AVOIDANCE RULES IN SCANDINAVIAN AND ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW 485<br />

Bettina Banoun<br />

This article examines the tax avoidance rules in Scandinavian and Anglo-American Law and, in this<br />

context, considers the rules in various countries, including Norway, Sweden and Denmark as well as<br />

the United Kingdom, Ganada, Australia and the United States. The article discuss~s the "substance<br />

over form" doctrine and provides an in-depth discussion of the content of an ami-avoidance ruie.<br />

CUMULATIVE INDEX 493<br />

~<br />

~i<br />

!:: ,~<br />

I"';',;<br />

§f",j',"íi<br />

" ,,"";" c, -."<br />

@2002International Bureau 01 Rscal Documentation ',"..."" "," c, " ""<br />

", " C ',"" "" """, c


I ~. ~ ~!E N T S OCTOBE 200<br />

OCTOBER 2002 '-tr-~,;1 'i"SULtETIN -~i- ~--: 497<br />

.'<br />

TAX TREATY MONITOR<br />

TAX TREATY NEWS 498<br />

Prof. Dr Dr h.c. Klaus Vogel<br />

RENT -A-ST AR -THE PURPOSE OF ARTICLE 17(2) OF THE OECD MODEL 500<br />

Dick Molenaar and Dr Harald Grams<br />

This ar1icle examines the "Iimited" and "unlimited" approaches of Ar1. 17(2) of the OECD Model. Ar1.<br />

17 allocates the right to tax the income of ar1istes and spor1smen to the source country (although not<br />

exclusively). Ar1. 17(2), added in 1977, provides for the limited approach: the source country still has<br />

the right to tax the income when another person (not the ar1iste or spor1sman himself) receives the<br />

remuneration for the performance. The unlimited approach was recommended in the 1987 OECD<br />

Repor1 on ar1istes and spor1smen and was adopted in the 1992 Commentary to the OECD Model.<br />

Under the unlimited approach, Ar1. 17(2) is extended so that it applies to alllegal entities that could<br />

receive fees for ar1istic and spor1s performances, meaning that the profits of the separate legal entity,<br />

as well as the income of the ar1iste or spor1sman, are taxable under Ar1. 17(2). The main question<br />

addressed in this ar1icle is: What is fair and necessary regarding Ar1. 17(2) -the limited approach or<br />

the unlimited approach?<br />

THE STATUS OF DOUBLE TAXATION TREATIES IN MEXICO 510<br />

Pedro Arias<br />

Mexico, currently the only Latin American country that is a member of the OECD, has limited experience<br />

in concluding tax treaties -Mexico's first comprehensive tax treaties date back to only the early<br />

1990s. Never1heless, Mexico has published a Model Tax Convention, which is patterned after the<br />

OECD Model but emphasizes taxation by the source country. This ar1icle considers various aspects<br />

of the tax treaties concluded by Mexico, including whether tax treaties prevail ayer domestic law in<br />

Mexico.<br />

INTERACTION OF ARTICLES 6, 7 AND 21 OF THE <strong>2000</strong> OECD MODEL CONVENTION 516<br />

Raul-Angelo Papotti and Nicola Saccardo<br />

This ar1icle considers the treaty regime applicable under an OECD Model-type treaty to income from<br />

immovable property derived by a resident of a contracting state in the context of an enterprise. The<br />

discussion assumes that the resident carries on his entrepreneurial activity through a permanent<br />

establishment in the other contracting state and that the immovable property forms par1 of that permanent<br />

establishment. The ar1icle examines the treaty ramifications of the treatment of the income in<br />

three situations -when the immovable property is located (a) in the state in whi


.<br />

~ JUL y 2002 <strong>BULLETIN</strong> 285<br />

,<br />

CONTENTS<br />

VOL. 56 NO.7 JULV 2002<br />

T AX TREA TY MONITOR<br />

TAX TREATY NEWS 286 Prof. Dr Dr h.c. Klaus Vogel<br />

CHARACTERIZATION OF OTHER STATES' PARTNERSHIPS <strong>FOR</strong> INCOME TAX 288 John F. Avery Jones (United Kingdom), Luc De Broe<br />

(Belgium), Maarten J. Ellis and Kees van Raad (Netherlands), Jean-Pierre Le Gall (France), Henri Torrione (Switzerland), Toshio Miyatake (Japan),<br />

Sidney l. Roberts and Sanford H. Goldberg (United States), Jürgen Killius (Germany), Guglielmo Maisto and Federico Giuliani (Italy), Richard J. Vann<br />

(Australia), David A. Ward (Canada) and Bertil Wiman (Sweden)<br />

The OECD Partnership Report is a significant contribution to the discussion of how to treat partner- ships for tax treaty purposes when two states<br />

categorize a partnership-like entity differently, either as transparent or as opaque. This article examines why different treatment of other states'<br />

bodies (to use a neutral term) for tax purposes can arise, particularly from the way in which sta te s classify foreign bodies, thus giving rise to part of<br />

the problem addressed in the OECD Partnership Report. This article focuses more on the categorization of partnerships than on the differences in tax<br />

treatment, which is the main focus of the OECD Report.<br />

CANADIAN TAXATION OF <strong>FOR</strong>EIGN SERVICE PROVIDERS: TREATY ISSUES ANO COURT DECISIONS 321 Nathan Boidman<br />

This article discusses some important elements of the taxation of cross-border service providers in light of two recent decisions of Canadian courts,<br />

Cheek and Wolf. The article considers these two judgements separately and in conjunction with Dudney, decided a few years earlier. The article also<br />

reviews the decision in Dudney.<br />

ARTICLES<br />

TAX TREATMENT OF CROSS-BORDER INCOME DERIVED THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP -A FINNISH<br />

PERSPECTIVE 327 Dr Marjaana Helminen<br />

Cross-border investment or business may be carried out through an entity having the legal form of a partnership. The use of partnerships for crossborder<br />

operations involves complex international tax law issues. The tax treatment in the source state, the partnership state and the residence state<br />

of the partners may be unclear and inconsistent. This article examines from a Finnish perspective the tax treatment of cross-border income derived<br />

through a partnership.<br />

PROPOSALS TO REDUCE COMPLIANCE COSTS -A MIXED RESPONSE BY THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT 333 Adrian J. Sawyer<br />

The Ministerial Panel on Business Compliance Costs, established in October <strong>2000</strong> to advise the New Zealand government on ways to reduce the<br />

costs to business of complying with existing legislation, released a report in July 2001 in which the Panel, among other things, made 11<br />

recommendations for the government to consider for reducing tax compliance costs. In December 2001, the government released the discussion<br />

document Striking the Balance: Government Response to the Ministerial Panel on Business Compliance Costs. This article focuses on the taxation<br />

issues raised during the consultation, the recommendations made in the Panel's report, and the government's response to the reconimendations.<br />

BOOK REVIEW 341 CUMULATIVE INDEX 342<br />

@ 2002 Internation~1 ~ure~\i of Fi~g~1 OQg\Jm~ntgtiQn ,.


2002, v. 56, n. 11<br />

• Página 542-553<br />

Autor/es: Jimenez, AJM<br />

Título: DOMESTIC ANTI-ABUSE RULES AND DOUBLE TAXATION<br />

TREATIES: A SPANISH PERSPECTIVE - PART I<br />

• Página 554-562<br />

Autor/es: Pijl, H<br />

Título: THE CONCEPT OF PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT AND<br />

THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE OECD COMMENTARY WITH<br />

SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DUTCH CASE LAW<br />

• Página 563-568<br />

Autor/es: Hong, LF<br />

Título: TAX CHANGES IN CHINA IMPENDING UPON ENTRY INTO<br />

THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION<br />

• Página 569-578<br />

Autor/es: Berkhout, TM<br />

Título: DEPRECIATION AND DOWNWARD VALUE ADJUSTMENTS<br />

OF REAL PROPERTY ACCORDING TO SOUND BUSINESS<br />

PRACTICE IN THE NETHERLANDS


2002, v. 56, n. 12<br />

• Página 586-599<br />

Autor/es: McLure, CE<br />

Título: REPLACING SEPARATE ENTITY ACCOUNTING AND THE<br />

ARM'S LENGTH PRINCIPLE WITH <strong>FOR</strong>MULARY APPORTIONMENT<br />

• Página 600-605<br />

Autor/es: Lapidoth, A<br />

Título: THE 2002 INCOME TAX RE<strong>FOR</strong>M IN ISRAEL<br />

• Página 606-619<br />

Autor/es: Cockfield, AJ<br />

Título: THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF DIGITAL TAXATION:<br />

CHALLENGES TO TRADITIONAL TAX LAWS AND PRINCIPLES<br />

• Página 620-626<br />

Autor/es: MartinJimenez, AJ<br />

Título: DOMESTIC ANTI-ABUSE RULES AND DOUBLE TAXATION<br />

TREATIES: A SPANISH PERSPECTIVE - PART

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!