Res.Update9
Res.Update9
Res.Update9
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proposed changes to the <strong>Res</strong>trictive Covenant<br />
The Council has given us constant assurances<br />
that they need “less than 300 sqm” to expand<br />
the school and the rest of the Rec will continue<br />
to be protected. The Council’s application to<br />
the Upper Tribunal shows these assurances to<br />
be worthless.<br />
The application documents refer to an area<br />
“coloured green” but do not specify its size.<br />
The accompanying maps show a “green” area<br />
of some 2,422 sqm (including the new school<br />
playground, the school building and the<br />
MUGA). But the Council insists it refers to the<br />
296 sqm which is to be a school playground.<br />
Why has the Council not applied for the piece<br />
of land on which they intend to build the<br />
school? Council Official Tom Proctor has said<br />
that the application is “in principle”: the new<br />
wording of the Covenant proposed by the<br />
Council says:<br />
“ …no building or other erection not reasonably<br />
required for use in connection with<br />
a pleasure ground and/or the adjoining<br />
Dundonald Primary School shall at any<br />
time be erected or made upon the said<br />
piece or parcel of land …”<br />
Other “public benefit” open space at risk too<br />
The Rec is “public benefit” but the Council is trying<br />
to stifle opposition at the Upper Tribunal by<br />
claiming that objectors have failed to identify an<br />
enforceable legal entitlement to the benefit of the<br />
restrictive covenant. Are they saying the Rec is<br />
NOT for public benefit, or are they saying local<br />
people are not the “public”?<br />
winc hes ter white<br />
E S T A T E A G E N T S<br />
Page 6<br />
If Merton residents are prevented from defending<br />
a public benefit covenant then ALL other open<br />
spaces “protected” by such agreements are at risk.<br />
John Innes Park and Church Fields in Merton Park<br />
have similar agreements. Will they be in<br />
jeopardy when the Council decides to expand<br />
Rutlish School or Merton Park Primary?<br />
Wimbledon’s Award Winning<br />
Lettings Specialist<br />
T: 020 3195 0768 • E: alexw@winchester-white.co.uk • W: www.winchester-white.co.uk<br />
Landlords: We are a young and exciting company with a hyper-talented team who<br />
will achieve you the very best results for your rental property. Alex Winchester has<br />
over 10 years experience in the Wimbledon lettings market so please call him<br />
directly on 07919 055 001 if you would like to<br />
discuss the possibility of renting your property<br />
Proposed new<br />
wording puts<br />
entire Rec at risk<br />
This amendment would allow the school<br />
to be built anywhere on the Rec, subject<br />
only to planning permission which as we<br />
know is easily forced through. So much for<br />
“principles”.