Res.Update9
Res.Update9
Res.Update9
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Save Our Rec<br />
PROTECT<br />
DUNDONALD<br />
REC<br />
Sport England against the loss of sport facilities<br />
just days after the Olympics<br />
Merton closes<br />
Sports facilities<br />
Sport England, the Government’s<br />
statutory body for sport, is opposing<br />
the loss of sports facilities at<br />
Dundonald Recreation Ground. Merton<br />
Council promised “new improved sports facilities<br />
offered to the local community with the expansion<br />
of the school”, but the published plans show the<br />
Rec will lose 50% of sport/community space.<br />
The reduction of the changing rooms, from six to<br />
four, breaches Sport England guidelines and could<br />
lead to the loss of one football pitch. The<br />
Tennis Courts will be transferred to the<br />
school and the closure of the bowling green<br />
has already been officially announced.<br />
Passionate<br />
about<br />
Dundonald<br />
Rec<br />
Wimbledon Guardian reported<br />
the celebrations by the<br />
entire local community of<br />
the prestigious Green Flag Award for our Recreation Ground.<br />
The judging panel were welcomed at the Rec by Members of<br />
the Friends of Dundonald Park, Protect Dundonald Rec, the<br />
Dundonald Tennis Club and local residents determined to keep<br />
the Rec open and green. (continue p 3)<br />
RESIDENTS UPDATE<br />
number 9 - September 27 th 2012<br />
r e c r e a t i o n • s p o r t • l e i s u r e<br />
f o r t h e c o m m u n i t y<br />
Let’s Save Our Rec<br />
for the present and future generations<br />
This could be one of the biggest<br />
Sport facility losses suffered in<br />
t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e B o r o u g h<br />
W e b s i t e : w w w . p r o t e c t d u n d o n a l d r e c . o r g<br />
E - m a i l : p r o t e c t d u n d o n a l d r e c @ h o t m a i l . c o . u k<br />
INSIDE THIS<br />
EDITION<br />
Green Flag awarded to<br />
Dundonald Rec<br />
page 3<br />
Merton Council’s Olympic<br />
legacy page 3<br />
Planning Consultation<br />
page 4<br />
The Real cost: Money<br />
down the drain<br />
page 5<br />
Planning application<br />
delayed page 5<br />
Other Open Space<br />
at risk page 6<br />
Merton Council may have to face a Judicial Review if the plans are forced through (continued p 2)<br />
MODIFICATION OF THE<br />
COVENANT PUTS THE<br />
ENTIRE REC AT RISK<br />
Upper Tribunal<br />
UPDATE<br />
Details of the application to the Lands<br />
Tribunal revealed: The proposed modification<br />
of the Covenant that has protected the Rec for 119<br />
years will expose the entire Recreation ground to the risk<br />
of future development. Other parks in Merton could be<br />
also at risk (continued p 6)
What happens<br />
Since being elected as your MP I have consistently supported moves to stop building on our green<br />
spaces in Wimbledon. The need for green spaces is immeasurable; be it for children to play, residents to<br />
exercise their pets as I do, a home for local sports teams, the place for exercise or just for local residents<br />
to enjoy; our quality of life is enhanced by green fields, parks and Commons. We endanger them at our<br />
peril and I shall always support and protect them.<br />
Wimbledon MP<br />
Mr Stephen Hammond<br />
P l a n n i n g U p d a t e :<br />
The diagram below shows the next stages:<br />
C o u n c i l<br />
P l a n n i n g<br />
A p p l i c a t i o n<br />
1<br />
What can I<br />
do now?<br />
What if the<br />
Council<br />
approve the<br />
application?<br />
280 objections<br />
were submitted<br />
by locals<br />
2<br />
Page 2<br />
N E X T<br />
November 2012<br />
The Mayor of London<br />
& Secretary of State<br />
will be Notified<br />
As this is a project which requires building on public Open Space, in breach of the<br />
Core Planning Strategy and has been objected by Sport England, it has to be<br />
referred up to the Secretary of State for decision.<br />
3<br />
Planning<br />
DECISION 4<br />
• Action group: We are currently organising a series of protest events aiming to make clear<br />
to members of the Planning Committee, who may consider this application in November, that<br />
the majority of residents who objected to the planning application will not allow any breach or<br />
bending of the planning rules that prevent building on Open Space or the loss of sport facilities.<br />
If you wish to become actively involved please let us know by email or letter. We need as many<br />
local people as possible to join us, to show the local strength of feeling.<br />
• Get involved and support any organisation that uses the Rec, for instance: the Tennis<br />
Club, football clubs, The Friends of Dundonald Park. All these groups of local people, from all<br />
walks of life, are against the loss of Open Space and sports facilities.<br />
• Join our mailing list to receive updates, if you haven’t already done so.<br />
• Make a donation, (see attached information). The organisation ‘Protect Dundonald Rec’ is<br />
run entirely by local people on a voluntary basis, giving their time and skills to the community,<br />
but we have to pay for expert legal advice to fight the Council’s lawyers.<br />
• If Sport England were to uphold their objection and Merton Council were<br />
minded to approve the application despite this, then the application may be<br />
CALLED IN by the Secretary of State. This would be far from ideal for Merton<br />
Council as they would not have full control of the outcome. Is this perhaps the reason<br />
why the date of the consideration by the Planning Committee has been postponed, for<br />
second time?<br />
• If Sport England were to withdraw their objection and the application<br />
was subsequently approved by Merton’s Planning Committee, in violation of<br />
all regulations against building on Open Space, this would lead to a Judicial<br />
Review – a process which could take years. This Review would fully scrutinise<br />
step-by step the role of every single official and councillor who participated during the<br />
whole process. Our solicitor Richard Buxton is a specialist in Planning Issues and<br />
Judicial Reviews and will be assisting us in this legal challenge.
Passionate about<br />
Dundonald Rec<br />
Anne Dawson, Secretary of the Friends of Dundonald Park, told the panel of ‘Green Flag’ Judges:<br />
“This park is at the very heart of the local community, it deserves a Green Flag and this would doubtless help in its protection. We all share a<br />
strong love for this park and a deep conviction that it must stay green”.<br />
M e r t o n C o u n c i l ’ s O l y m p i c l e g a c y :<br />
Tennis Courts to be<br />
transferred to the School<br />
Football Pitch<br />
potentially at risk<br />
B E C O M E A<br />
S P O N S O R<br />
Bowling Green<br />
Closing down<br />
Page 3<br />
Communities Minister<br />
Andrew Stunell said:<br />
“Great parks and green spaces<br />
have a huge impact on local communities,<br />
providing places to play<br />
and relax as well as bringing generations<br />
together in a variety of<br />
ways. They are fundamental to our<br />
quality of life, whether in cities,<br />
towns or villages, and the Green<br />
Flag Award scheme seeks to help<br />
raise the standards of them all.”<br />
50% less space<br />
for sports teams<br />
Sport England will oppose<br />
any loss of sports Facilities<br />
Members of the many Football teams have expressed deep<br />
concern about the loss of sports facilities in the pavilion<br />
and the risk of a substantial reduction of football at the Rec.<br />
David Archer from Dundonald Chase FC said:<br />
“It’s unbelievable and shows contempt for the sporting<br />
community. It is the year of the Olympics and what are they doing<br />
for us? Cutting the number of toilets and changing rooms, putting the<br />
use of one of the pitch’s at risk and shutting the bowling green used<br />
by local senior citizens, it’s a disgrace! “<br />
We need YOU now more than ever. We are currently consulting solicitors<br />
and other experts (In preparation for the Court Hearing at the<br />
Upper Tribunal) and the potential Judicial Review. Please DONATE<br />
ONLINE on our website or by cheque (see attached information sheet)
The Planning consultation - Here is what they said:<br />
The Design Review Panel met on<br />
24th January 2012 and reported:<br />
“The Panel noted that there had been some improvements<br />
to the scheme since it was reviewed in<br />
December 2011. Notwithstanding this, the Panel<br />
still felt that the applicant had not provided<br />
a clear and understandable explanation for<br />
why the new building had to encroach onto<br />
the open space setting.<br />
This was following a further explanation by the<br />
applicant, which related to the internal configuration<br />
of an on-site extension not working efficiently internally<br />
and issues to do with tree retention. The<br />
Panel felt that the material provided simply<br />
did not show an attempt to provide all the<br />
new building on the existing site, nor did it<br />
show how this could not be made to work.<br />
Hence the Panel’s strong scepticism that this<br />
issue had not been properly addressed.”<br />
Page 4<br />
The Friends of Dundonald Park objected<br />
to the application on the following grounds:<br />
“(i) The Loss of Public Open Space<br />
(ii) The Adverse Effects of Development on the Park<br />
(iii) The Effect on Recreational Facilities and Access.”<br />
“Whilst sympathetic to the council’s need to provide<br />
school places, in our view the case has not been<br />
made for these proposals which are an unacceptable<br />
departure from local, London and national planning<br />
policies. There should be no loss of public<br />
open space in our much valued local park.<br />
The proposals will continue the current uncertainty<br />
which is holding back improvements, make the<br />
park highly unattractive during a lengthy<br />
construction phase, and bring long-term<br />
harm to the park.”<br />
Over 280 local residents objected to the proposals (95% of the representations<br />
received by the planning department). Here is what some of them had to say:<br />
“In educational terms, the Council has identified the<br />
problem of an increased need for school places, but<br />
does not seem to have seriously considered other<br />
viable options to solve it. Such a problem could in<br />
all possibility cease to be a problem in a few years,<br />
but the proposed solution will endure into the foreseeable<br />
future and probably beyond, long after the<br />
problem it was designed to solve is forgotten.”<br />
INT, Wilton Grove<br />
“Astonishingly the Pavilion facilities will be even<br />
smaller than they are currently … users will be<br />
dependent on the goodwill of the school and not<br />
vice versa as it should be.”<br />
JW, Hartfield Crescent<br />
“I believe that even people who are pro the development<br />
will come to realise the high price the local community<br />
will be paying for these 200 extra spaces. A<br />
high price that the Council is trying to brush under the<br />
carpet with the propaganda that there is ‘no other<br />
choice’. There is. A new school.”<br />
PN, The Quadrant<br />
“Merton owns a great deal of brown field sites which<br />
can be developed to make a new school…The residents<br />
of Merton cannot be expected to pay for the<br />
past mistakes of the council, selling off Victorian<br />
school buildings, such as Pelham School in Southey<br />
Road, for private development…Do I trust Merton<br />
Council to do the best for my community? No, I do<br />
not.”<br />
ABD, Herbert Road<br />
Some of the trees which provide a harmonious green backdrop<br />
to the Rec and soften the impact of the school buildings<br />
All would NEED TO BE REMOVED for the new development or are threatened by construction traffic<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1. Tree of Heaven, 2. Field Maple 3. Hedge around the tennis courts. 4. Mature ash The freestanding mature ash tree is a fine<br />
specimen, of good shape, and prominent in views across the Rec. 5. Silver Birch. 6. Drummond's Norway Maple. 7. Sargent's Cherry<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7
The REAL cost of the cheapest option<br />
Council tax and other money down the drain<br />
In the last few years the Council has spent almost £160,000 on<br />
improvements to the children’s play area<br />
£94,048 for the major upgrading when much of the play<br />
apparatus was installed<br />
£65,557 on the further additions, made only two years ago,<br />
including the sand pit, using Play Pathfinder money.<br />
A further £13,171 has been spent on upgrading<br />
the pavilion in the last 3 years.<br />
The Council is unwilling to divulge even a ballpark figure<br />
for the budget for the rebuildiing of the pavilion or the<br />
extensive construction and landscaping works required for relocating<br />
facilities and extending the school playground on to the<br />
Rec.<br />
It says that this will not be available until after late autumn<br />
2012, when tendering is completed.<br />
PLANNING APPLICATION DELAYED:<br />
IS THE COUNCIL THINKING AGAIN?<br />
On 21st August the London Borough of Merton has announced that the planning application for<br />
the expansion of Dundonald School is expected to go to the Planning Committee in November, a further<br />
delay of two months after the previous postponement from July to September.<br />
According to the Council….. The Truth is<br />
……..”the delay is to allow the Council to<br />
undertake more work and provide more information<br />
following comments by Merton Council’s<br />
Design Review Panel* and respondents to the<br />
consultations “that more work needs to be done<br />
to ensure all the different options for expanding<br />
Dundonald school have been fully explored”, as<br />
well as Sport England’s** request for further<br />
information on the current use of MUGA<br />
* Merton Council's Design Review Panel comprises a<br />
group of architects and independent professionals and<br />
advises the Council on design issues in relation to both<br />
major planning applications and pre-application development<br />
proposals.<br />
** Sport England have a role protecting sports provision<br />
and must be formally consulted on any English planning<br />
applications that affect playing fields.<br />
Page 5<br />
The school expansion proposals<br />
include digging up the existing,<br />
very popular, play area and<br />
constructing a new one where the<br />
bowling green is<br />
currently, close to<br />
Fairlawn Road.<br />
It will now be demolished<br />
and much reduced<br />
facilities provided.<br />
This means that councillors will be<br />
asked, at a time of acute austerity,<br />
to vote through a<br />
totally uncosted<br />
proposal.<br />
WASTE<br />
of money<br />
WASTE<br />
of money<br />
BLANK<br />
cheque?<br />
• Sport England have expressed serious<br />
concerns for the loss of sporting facilities in<br />
Dundonald Recreation Ground and are intending<br />
to object to the proposals.<br />
• Over 280 local residents, as well as local<br />
sport organisations and the Friends of Dundonald<br />
Park, have forwarded their strong objections<br />
to the planning department (95% of all<br />
representations received opposed the plans).<br />
• The National Planning Casework Unit, on<br />
behalf of the Secretary of State for<br />
Communities and Local Government, is presently<br />
monitoring this application and have informed<br />
us that they will intervene if Merton Council was<br />
minded to approve this application.<br />
• Merton Council’s Design Review Panel have<br />
expressed concern about the encroachment on<br />
open space.<br />
GIVEN THE COUNCIL’S CLAIM OF THE ABSOLUTE URGENCY TO DELIVER THIS AND<br />
OTHER SCHOOL EXPANSIONS: WHY THE DELAY?
Proposed changes to the <strong>Res</strong>trictive Covenant<br />
The Council has given us constant assurances<br />
that they need “less than 300 sqm” to expand<br />
the school and the rest of the Rec will continue<br />
to be protected. The Council’s application to<br />
the Upper Tribunal shows these assurances to<br />
be worthless.<br />
The application documents refer to an area<br />
“coloured green” but do not specify its size.<br />
The accompanying maps show a “green” area<br />
of some 2,422 sqm (including the new school<br />
playground, the school building and the<br />
MUGA). But the Council insists it refers to the<br />
296 sqm which is to be a school playground.<br />
Why has the Council not applied for the piece<br />
of land on which they intend to build the<br />
school? Council Official Tom Proctor has said<br />
that the application is “in principle”: the new<br />
wording of the Covenant proposed by the<br />
Council says:<br />
“ …no building or other erection not reasonably<br />
required for use in connection with<br />
a pleasure ground and/or the adjoining<br />
Dundonald Primary School shall at any<br />
time be erected or made upon the said<br />
piece or parcel of land …”<br />
Other “public benefit” open space at risk too<br />
The Rec is “public benefit” but the Council is trying<br />
to stifle opposition at the Upper Tribunal by<br />
claiming that objectors have failed to identify an<br />
enforceable legal entitlement to the benefit of the<br />
restrictive covenant. Are they saying the Rec is<br />
NOT for public benefit, or are they saying local<br />
people are not the “public”?<br />
winc hes ter white<br />
E S T A T E A G E N T S<br />
Page 6<br />
If Merton residents are prevented from defending<br />
a public benefit covenant then ALL other open<br />
spaces “protected” by such agreements are at risk.<br />
John Innes Park and Church Fields in Merton Park<br />
have similar agreements. Will they be in<br />
jeopardy when the Council decides to expand<br />
Rutlish School or Merton Park Primary?<br />
Wimbledon’s Award Winning<br />
Lettings Specialist<br />
T: 020 3195 0768 • E: alexw@winchester-white.co.uk • W: www.winchester-white.co.uk<br />
Landlords: We are a young and exciting company with a hyper-talented team who<br />
will achieve you the very best results for your rental property. Alex Winchester has<br />
over 10 years experience in the Wimbledon lettings market so please call him<br />
directly on 07919 055 001 if you would like to<br />
discuss the possibility of renting your property<br />
Proposed new<br />
wording puts<br />
entire Rec at risk<br />
This amendment would allow the school<br />
to be built anywhere on the Rec, subject<br />
only to planning permission which as we<br />
know is easily forced through. So much for<br />
“principles”.
Dundonald Rec<br />
Tennis Courts<br />
destined to be closed<br />
to the public?<br />
Our local Tennis Courts<br />
by Toby H<br />
I've been involved for many years with Racquets Sports representing England<br />
and winning several international championships. Sport is a key element of<br />
my life and for other people’s lives, it is essential to keep fit (both physically<br />
and mentally). It is also an excellent way of meeting other people and<br />
integrate with the local community.<br />
I joined Dundonald Tennis Club last year chiefly to stay fit and have people to play tennis with, however<br />
the best benefit is that I now feel part of the local Dundonald community. I was already making<br />
use of the tennis courts, whenever I could find an opponent, but joining the club has made finding<br />
someone to play with much easier. I’ve met people of all ages and backgrounds, good players, not<br />
so-good players (not sure which classification I fit into!), househusbands, retired people, part-time<br />
workers, home-workers, parents and their children.<br />
There are many levels of play going on at the Dundonald Courts. From knock-arounds to five setters.<br />
It’s a friendly, welcoming club, why don’t you join us?<br />
www.dundonalrectennisclub.org<br />
League and friendly matches<br />
All levels (from total beginner to advanced)<br />
Dundonald Rec Tennis Club<br />
W I M B L E D O N<br />
Page 7<br />
Join your local<br />
Tennis Club it’s<br />
FREE ...<br />
info@dundonaldrectennisclub.org
Bike Maintenance<br />
For details call-<br />
07940 517 422<br />
or email<br />
ben@opusmagnum.co.uk<br />
Michael Wray Hairdressing<br />
154 Merton Hall Road<br />
Wimbledon SW19 3PZ<br />
Tel: 020 8540 1632<br />
Email:michael@michaelwray.co.uk<br />
De Freitas Interiors<br />
HOME STYLIST<br />
Innovative and imaginative solutions to your interior design<br />
needs. Whether it be an entire house, room revamp or rearranging<br />
your own personal belongings with the assistance<br />
of an expert to create a clutter-free new-look for your home.<br />
ricardocentral@aol.com<br />
Would you like to advertise<br />
your services here?<br />
Reaching a readership of 3500<br />
whilst helping to keep Dundonald Rec<br />
unchanged for us and future generations.<br />
Able & Ryan<br />
French polishers, Furniture <strong>Res</strong>torers<br />
& Upholsterers<br />
4 Merton Park Parade, Kingston Road, Merton Park,<br />
London SW19 3NT<br />
Tel: 020 8545 0655, Fax: 020 8395 4566<br />
www.ableandryan.co.uk<br />
WE URGE YOU TO KEEP THE<br />
POSTERS<br />
DISPLAYED IN YOUR WINDOWS<br />
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.<br />
If yours is faded or beginning to look tatty,<br />
we have more copies, please contact us.<br />
Visit our website:<br />
W e b s i t e : w w w . p r o t e c t d u n d o n a l d r e c . o r g<br />
in-between editions of <strong>Res</strong>idents Update to keep up-to-date on the news and legal issues<br />
Page 8<br />
www.staysafedriving.co.uk<br />
Melissa Okker DSA ADI (car)<br />
Head office: 0800 999 2500 Mobile: 07754 053038<br />
melissa.okker@staysafedriving.co.uk