12.10.2012 Views

Res.Update9

Res.Update9

Res.Update9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Save Our Rec<br />

PROTECT<br />

DUNDONALD<br />

REC<br />

Sport England against the loss of sport facilities<br />

just days after the Olympics<br />

Merton closes<br />

Sports facilities<br />

Sport England, the Government’s<br />

statutory body for sport, is opposing<br />

the loss of sports facilities at<br />

Dundonald Recreation Ground. Merton<br />

Council promised “new improved sports facilities<br />

offered to the local community with the expansion<br />

of the school”, but the published plans show the<br />

Rec will lose 50% of sport/community space.<br />

The reduction of the changing rooms, from six to<br />

four, breaches Sport England guidelines and could<br />

lead to the loss of one football pitch. The<br />

Tennis Courts will be transferred to the<br />

school and the closure of the bowling green<br />

has already been officially announced.<br />

Passionate<br />

about<br />

Dundonald<br />

Rec<br />

Wimbledon Guardian reported<br />

the celebrations by the<br />

entire local community of<br />

the prestigious Green Flag Award for our Recreation Ground.<br />

The judging panel were welcomed at the Rec by Members of<br />

the Friends of Dundonald Park, Protect Dundonald Rec, the<br />

Dundonald Tennis Club and local residents determined to keep<br />

the Rec open and green. (continue p 3)<br />

RESIDENTS UPDATE<br />

number 9 - September 27 th 2012<br />

r e c r e a t i o n • s p o r t • l e i s u r e<br />

f o r t h e c o m m u n i t y<br />

Let’s Save Our Rec<br />

for the present and future generations<br />

This could be one of the biggest<br />

Sport facility losses suffered in<br />

t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e B o r o u g h<br />

W e b s i t e : w w w . p r o t e c t d u n d o n a l d r e c . o r g<br />

E - m a i l : p r o t e c t d u n d o n a l d r e c @ h o t m a i l . c o . u k<br />

INSIDE THIS<br />

EDITION<br />

Green Flag awarded to<br />

Dundonald Rec<br />

page 3<br />

Merton Council’s Olympic<br />

legacy page 3<br />

Planning Consultation<br />

page 4<br />

The Real cost: Money<br />

down the drain<br />

page 5<br />

Planning application<br />

delayed page 5<br />

Other Open Space<br />

at risk page 6<br />

Merton Council may have to face a Judicial Review if the plans are forced through (continued p 2)<br />

MODIFICATION OF THE<br />

COVENANT PUTS THE<br />

ENTIRE REC AT RISK<br />

Upper Tribunal<br />

UPDATE<br />

Details of the application to the Lands<br />

Tribunal revealed: The proposed modification<br />

of the Covenant that has protected the Rec for 119<br />

years will expose the entire Recreation ground to the risk<br />

of future development. Other parks in Merton could be<br />

also at risk (continued p 6)


What happens<br />

Since being elected as your MP I have consistently supported moves to stop building on our green<br />

spaces in Wimbledon. The need for green spaces is immeasurable; be it for children to play, residents to<br />

exercise their pets as I do, a home for local sports teams, the place for exercise or just for local residents<br />

to enjoy; our quality of life is enhanced by green fields, parks and Commons. We endanger them at our<br />

peril and I shall always support and protect them.<br />

Wimbledon MP<br />

Mr Stephen Hammond<br />

P l a n n i n g U p d a t e :<br />

The diagram below shows the next stages:<br />

C o u n c i l<br />

P l a n n i n g<br />

A p p l i c a t i o n<br />

1<br />

What can I<br />

do now?<br />

What if the<br />

Council<br />

approve the<br />

application?<br />

280 objections<br />

were submitted<br />

by locals<br />

2<br />

Page 2<br />

N E X T<br />

November 2012<br />

The Mayor of London<br />

& Secretary of State<br />

will be Notified<br />

As this is a project which requires building on public Open Space, in breach of the<br />

Core Planning Strategy and has been objected by Sport England, it has to be<br />

referred up to the Secretary of State for decision.<br />

3<br />

Planning<br />

DECISION 4<br />

• Action group: We are currently organising a series of protest events aiming to make clear<br />

to members of the Planning Committee, who may consider this application in November, that<br />

the majority of residents who objected to the planning application will not allow any breach or<br />

bending of the planning rules that prevent building on Open Space or the loss of sport facilities.<br />

If you wish to become actively involved please let us know by email or letter. We need as many<br />

local people as possible to join us, to show the local strength of feeling.<br />

• Get involved and support any organisation that uses the Rec, for instance: the Tennis<br />

Club, football clubs, The Friends of Dundonald Park. All these groups of local people, from all<br />

walks of life, are against the loss of Open Space and sports facilities.<br />

• Join our mailing list to receive updates, if you haven’t already done so.<br />

• Make a donation, (see attached information). The organisation ‘Protect Dundonald Rec’ is<br />

run entirely by local people on a voluntary basis, giving their time and skills to the community,<br />

but we have to pay for expert legal advice to fight the Council’s lawyers.<br />

• If Sport England were to uphold their objection and Merton Council were<br />

minded to approve the application despite this, then the application may be<br />

CALLED IN by the Secretary of State. This would be far from ideal for Merton<br />

Council as they would not have full control of the outcome. Is this perhaps the reason<br />

why the date of the consideration by the Planning Committee has been postponed, for<br />

second time?<br />

• If Sport England were to withdraw their objection and the application<br />

was subsequently approved by Merton’s Planning Committee, in violation of<br />

all regulations against building on Open Space, this would lead to a Judicial<br />

Review – a process which could take years. This Review would fully scrutinise<br />

step-by step the role of every single official and councillor who participated during the<br />

whole process. Our solicitor Richard Buxton is a specialist in Planning Issues and<br />

Judicial Reviews and will be assisting us in this legal challenge.


Passionate about<br />

Dundonald Rec<br />

Anne Dawson, Secretary of the Friends of Dundonald Park, told the panel of ‘Green Flag’ Judges:<br />

“This park is at the very heart of the local community, it deserves a Green Flag and this would doubtless help in its protection. We all share a<br />

strong love for this park and a deep conviction that it must stay green”.<br />

M e r t o n C o u n c i l ’ s O l y m p i c l e g a c y :<br />

Tennis Courts to be<br />

transferred to the School<br />

Football Pitch<br />

potentially at risk<br />

B E C O M E A<br />

S P O N S O R<br />

Bowling Green<br />

Closing down<br />

Page 3<br />

Communities Minister<br />

Andrew Stunell said:<br />

“Great parks and green spaces<br />

have a huge impact on local communities,<br />

providing places to play<br />

and relax as well as bringing generations<br />

together in a variety of<br />

ways. They are fundamental to our<br />

quality of life, whether in cities,<br />

towns or villages, and the Green<br />

Flag Award scheme seeks to help<br />

raise the standards of them all.”<br />

50% less space<br />

for sports teams<br />

Sport England will oppose<br />

any loss of sports Facilities<br />

Members of the many Football teams have expressed deep<br />

concern about the loss of sports facilities in the pavilion<br />

and the risk of a substantial reduction of football at the Rec.<br />

David Archer from Dundonald Chase FC said:<br />

“It’s unbelievable and shows contempt for the sporting<br />

community. It is the year of the Olympics and what are they doing<br />

for us? Cutting the number of toilets and changing rooms, putting the<br />

use of one of the pitch’s at risk and shutting the bowling green used<br />

by local senior citizens, it’s a disgrace! “<br />

We need YOU now more than ever. We are currently consulting solicitors<br />

and other experts (In preparation for the Court Hearing at the<br />

Upper Tribunal) and the potential Judicial Review. Please DONATE<br />

ONLINE on our website or by cheque (see attached information sheet)


The Planning consultation - Here is what they said:<br />

The Design Review Panel met on<br />

24th January 2012 and reported:<br />

“The Panel noted that there had been some improvements<br />

to the scheme since it was reviewed in<br />

December 2011. Notwithstanding this, the Panel<br />

still felt that the applicant had not provided<br />

a clear and understandable explanation for<br />

why the new building had to encroach onto<br />

the open space setting.<br />

This was following a further explanation by the<br />

applicant, which related to the internal configuration<br />

of an on-site extension not working efficiently internally<br />

and issues to do with tree retention. The<br />

Panel felt that the material provided simply<br />

did not show an attempt to provide all the<br />

new building on the existing site, nor did it<br />

show how this could not be made to work.<br />

Hence the Panel’s strong scepticism that this<br />

issue had not been properly addressed.”<br />

Page 4<br />

The Friends of Dundonald Park objected<br />

to the application on the following grounds:<br />

“(i) The Loss of Public Open Space<br />

(ii) The Adverse Effects of Development on the Park<br />

(iii) The Effect on Recreational Facilities and Access.”<br />

“Whilst sympathetic to the council’s need to provide<br />

school places, in our view the case has not been<br />

made for these proposals which are an unacceptable<br />

departure from local, London and national planning<br />

policies. There should be no loss of public<br />

open space in our much valued local park.<br />

The proposals will continue the current uncertainty<br />

which is holding back improvements, make the<br />

park highly unattractive during a lengthy<br />

construction phase, and bring long-term<br />

harm to the park.”<br />

Over 280 local residents objected to the proposals (95% of the representations<br />

received by the planning department). Here is what some of them had to say:<br />

“In educational terms, the Council has identified the<br />

problem of an increased need for school places, but<br />

does not seem to have seriously considered other<br />

viable options to solve it. Such a problem could in<br />

all possibility cease to be a problem in a few years,<br />

but the proposed solution will endure into the foreseeable<br />

future and probably beyond, long after the<br />

problem it was designed to solve is forgotten.”<br />

INT, Wilton Grove<br />

“Astonishingly the Pavilion facilities will be even<br />

smaller than they are currently … users will be<br />

dependent on the goodwill of the school and not<br />

vice versa as it should be.”<br />

JW, Hartfield Crescent<br />

“I believe that even people who are pro the development<br />

will come to realise the high price the local community<br />

will be paying for these 200 extra spaces. A<br />

high price that the Council is trying to brush under the<br />

carpet with the propaganda that there is ‘no other<br />

choice’. There is. A new school.”<br />

PN, The Quadrant<br />

“Merton owns a great deal of brown field sites which<br />

can be developed to make a new school…The residents<br />

of Merton cannot be expected to pay for the<br />

past mistakes of the council, selling off Victorian<br />

school buildings, such as Pelham School in Southey<br />

Road, for private development…Do I trust Merton<br />

Council to do the best for my community? No, I do<br />

not.”<br />

ABD, Herbert Road<br />

Some of the trees which provide a harmonious green backdrop<br />

to the Rec and soften the impact of the school buildings<br />

All would NEED TO BE REMOVED for the new development or are threatened by construction traffic<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

1. Tree of Heaven, 2. Field Maple 3. Hedge around the tennis courts. 4. Mature ash The freestanding mature ash tree is a fine<br />

specimen, of good shape, and prominent in views across the Rec. 5. Silver Birch. 6. Drummond's Norway Maple. 7. Sargent's Cherry<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7


The REAL cost of the cheapest option<br />

Council tax and other money down the drain<br />

In the last few years the Council has spent almost £160,000 on<br />

improvements to the children’s play area<br />

£94,048 for the major upgrading when much of the play<br />

apparatus was installed<br />

£65,557 on the further additions, made only two years ago,<br />

including the sand pit, using Play Pathfinder money.<br />

A further £13,171 has been spent on upgrading<br />

the pavilion in the last 3 years.<br />

The Council is unwilling to divulge even a ballpark figure<br />

for the budget for the rebuildiing of the pavilion or the<br />

extensive construction and landscaping works required for relocating<br />

facilities and extending the school playground on to the<br />

Rec.<br />

It says that this will not be available until after late autumn<br />

2012, when tendering is completed.<br />

PLANNING APPLICATION DELAYED:<br />

IS THE COUNCIL THINKING AGAIN?<br />

On 21st August the London Borough of Merton has announced that the planning application for<br />

the expansion of Dundonald School is expected to go to the Planning Committee in November, a further<br />

delay of two months after the previous postponement from July to September.<br />

According to the Council….. The Truth is<br />

……..”the delay is to allow the Council to<br />

undertake more work and provide more information<br />

following comments by Merton Council’s<br />

Design Review Panel* and respondents to the<br />

consultations “that more work needs to be done<br />

to ensure all the different options for expanding<br />

Dundonald school have been fully explored”, as<br />

well as Sport England’s** request for further<br />

information on the current use of MUGA<br />

* Merton Council's Design Review Panel comprises a<br />

group of architects and independent professionals and<br />

advises the Council on design issues in relation to both<br />

major planning applications and pre-application development<br />

proposals.<br />

** Sport England have a role protecting sports provision<br />

and must be formally consulted on any English planning<br />

applications that affect playing fields.<br />

Page 5<br />

The school expansion proposals<br />

include digging up the existing,<br />

very popular, play area and<br />

constructing a new one where the<br />

bowling green is<br />

currently, close to<br />

Fairlawn Road.<br />

It will now be demolished<br />

and much reduced<br />

facilities provided.<br />

This means that councillors will be<br />

asked, at a time of acute austerity,<br />

to vote through a<br />

totally uncosted<br />

proposal.<br />

WASTE<br />

of money<br />

WASTE<br />

of money<br />

BLANK<br />

cheque?<br />

• Sport England have expressed serious<br />

concerns for the loss of sporting facilities in<br />

Dundonald Recreation Ground and are intending<br />

to object to the proposals.<br />

• Over 280 local residents, as well as local<br />

sport organisations and the Friends of Dundonald<br />

Park, have forwarded their strong objections<br />

to the planning department (95% of all<br />

representations received opposed the plans).<br />

• The National Planning Casework Unit, on<br />

behalf of the Secretary of State for<br />

Communities and Local Government, is presently<br />

monitoring this application and have informed<br />

us that they will intervene if Merton Council was<br />

minded to approve this application.<br />

• Merton Council’s Design Review Panel have<br />

expressed concern about the encroachment on<br />

open space.<br />

GIVEN THE COUNCIL’S CLAIM OF THE ABSOLUTE URGENCY TO DELIVER THIS AND<br />

OTHER SCHOOL EXPANSIONS: WHY THE DELAY?


Proposed changes to the <strong>Res</strong>trictive Covenant<br />

The Council has given us constant assurances<br />

that they need “less than 300 sqm” to expand<br />

the school and the rest of the Rec will continue<br />

to be protected. The Council’s application to<br />

the Upper Tribunal shows these assurances to<br />

be worthless.<br />

The application documents refer to an area<br />

“coloured green” but do not specify its size.<br />

The accompanying maps show a “green” area<br />

of some 2,422 sqm (including the new school<br />

playground, the school building and the<br />

MUGA). But the Council insists it refers to the<br />

296 sqm which is to be a school playground.<br />

Why has the Council not applied for the piece<br />

of land on which they intend to build the<br />

school? Council Official Tom Proctor has said<br />

that the application is “in principle”: the new<br />

wording of the Covenant proposed by the<br />

Council says:<br />

“ …no building or other erection not reasonably<br />

required for use in connection with<br />

a pleasure ground and/or the adjoining<br />

Dundonald Primary School shall at any<br />

time be erected or made upon the said<br />

piece or parcel of land …”<br />

Other “public benefit” open space at risk too<br />

The Rec is “public benefit” but the Council is trying<br />

to stifle opposition at the Upper Tribunal by<br />

claiming that objectors have failed to identify an<br />

enforceable legal entitlement to the benefit of the<br />

restrictive covenant. Are they saying the Rec is<br />

NOT for public benefit, or are they saying local<br />

people are not the “public”?<br />

winc hes ter white<br />

E S T A T E A G E N T S<br />

Page 6<br />

If Merton residents are prevented from defending<br />

a public benefit covenant then ALL other open<br />

spaces “protected” by such agreements are at risk.<br />

John Innes Park and Church Fields in Merton Park<br />

have similar agreements. Will they be in<br />

jeopardy when the Council decides to expand<br />

Rutlish School or Merton Park Primary?<br />

Wimbledon’s Award Winning<br />

Lettings Specialist<br />

T: 020 3195 0768 • E: alexw@winchester-white.co.uk • W: www.winchester-white.co.uk<br />

Landlords: We are a young and exciting company with a hyper-talented team who<br />

will achieve you the very best results for your rental property. Alex Winchester has<br />

over 10 years experience in the Wimbledon lettings market so please call him<br />

directly on 07919 055 001 if you would like to<br />

discuss the possibility of renting your property<br />

Proposed new<br />

wording puts<br />

entire Rec at risk<br />

This amendment would allow the school<br />

to be built anywhere on the Rec, subject<br />

only to planning permission which as we<br />

know is easily forced through. So much for<br />

“principles”.


Dundonald Rec<br />

Tennis Courts<br />

destined to be closed<br />

to the public?<br />

Our local Tennis Courts<br />

by Toby H<br />

I've been involved for many years with Racquets Sports representing England<br />

and winning several international championships. Sport is a key element of<br />

my life and for other people’s lives, it is essential to keep fit (both physically<br />

and mentally). It is also an excellent way of meeting other people and<br />

integrate with the local community.<br />

I joined Dundonald Tennis Club last year chiefly to stay fit and have people to play tennis with, however<br />

the best benefit is that I now feel part of the local Dundonald community. I was already making<br />

use of the tennis courts, whenever I could find an opponent, but joining the club has made finding<br />

someone to play with much easier. I’ve met people of all ages and backgrounds, good players, not<br />

so-good players (not sure which classification I fit into!), househusbands, retired people, part-time<br />

workers, home-workers, parents and their children.<br />

There are many levels of play going on at the Dundonald Courts. From knock-arounds to five setters.<br />

It’s a friendly, welcoming club, why don’t you join us?<br />

www.dundonalrectennisclub.org<br />

League and friendly matches<br />

All levels (from total beginner to advanced)<br />

Dundonald Rec Tennis Club<br />

W I M B L E D O N<br />

Page 7<br />

Join your local<br />

Tennis Club it’s<br />

FREE ...<br />

info@dundonaldrectennisclub.org


Bike Maintenance<br />

For details call-<br />

07940 517 422<br />

or email<br />

ben@opusmagnum.co.uk<br />

Michael Wray Hairdressing<br />

154 Merton Hall Road<br />

Wimbledon SW19 3PZ<br />

Tel: 020 8540 1632<br />

Email:michael@michaelwray.co.uk<br />

De Freitas Interiors<br />

HOME STYLIST<br />

Innovative and imaginative solutions to your interior design<br />

needs. Whether it be an entire house, room revamp or rearranging<br />

your own personal belongings with the assistance<br />

of an expert to create a clutter-free new-look for your home.<br />

ricardocentral@aol.com<br />

Would you like to advertise<br />

your services here?<br />

Reaching a readership of 3500<br />

whilst helping to keep Dundonald Rec<br />

unchanged for us and future generations.<br />

Able & Ryan<br />

French polishers, Furniture <strong>Res</strong>torers<br />

& Upholsterers<br />

4 Merton Park Parade, Kingston Road, Merton Park,<br />

London SW19 3NT<br />

Tel: 020 8545 0655, Fax: 020 8395 4566<br />

www.ableandryan.co.uk<br />

WE URGE YOU TO KEEP THE<br />

POSTERS<br />

DISPLAYED IN YOUR WINDOWS<br />

UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.<br />

If yours is faded or beginning to look tatty,<br />

we have more copies, please contact us.<br />

Visit our website:<br />

W e b s i t e : w w w . p r o t e c t d u n d o n a l d r e c . o r g<br />

in-between editions of <strong>Res</strong>idents Update to keep up-to-date on the news and legal issues<br />

Page 8<br />

www.staysafedriving.co.uk<br />

Melissa Okker DSA ADI (car)<br />

Head office: 0800 999 2500 Mobile: 07754 053038<br />

melissa.okker@staysafedriving.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!