Development of Anthropogenic Soil Classification - Virginia Tech

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Questions Unresolved - Circular 7 Can HAHT soils be allocated consistently to avoid being grouped together without specificity, and to avoid including soils not pr<strong>of</strong>oundly altered by humans? Should taxa be added at the new order, suborders, or lower levels? Can we standardize what we already have (fill empty taxa or replace them consistently without adding more empty taxa)? Taxa were scattered from suborder to subgroup levels, most empty.
Circular Letter 7 Can HAHT materials be defined as differentiae using field evidence? Can irregular carbon decreases be identified as anthropogenic or natural? Should we survey contaminated and landfill soils? Will we have to split existing series and remap areas?
Page 1 and 2: Dr. John M. Galbraith, Virginia Tec
Page 3 and 4: Thank you, Hari
Page 5 and 6: Introduction Anthropogenic (profou
Page 7 and 8: Mountaintop Removal
Page 9 and 10: L. Wilding and R. Ahrens, Euro. Soi
Page 11 and 12: Amending Soil Taxonomy Hari Eswara
Page 14 and 15: History http://clic.cses.vt.edu/IC
Page 16 and 17: Circular Letters 6 (continued) Hor
Page 20 and 21: Heavy metals in the park Lead
Page 22 and 23: Solutions Proposed - Consistently I
Page 24 and 25: Solutions Proposed - Taxa Levels W
Page 26 and 27: Human-altered and -transported Soil
Page 28 and 29: Contaminated HAHT Soils Should we
Page 30 and 31: Classify Similar to Existing Taxa?
Page 32 and 33: HAHT Material Class Examples Methan
Page 34 and 35: Split Series and Remap? NO. But, s
Page 36 and 37: Pic of mine soils Now we would add
Page 38 and 39: Associated Changes to NSSH Anthrop
Page 40 and 41: Specific Subgroups Extragrade subg
Page 42: Conclusion? Currently, the proposa

Development of Anthropogenic Soil Classification - Virginia Tech

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?